about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,518 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the second variable is Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona increased, so did the efficiency of processing legal documents. This inadvertently led to a surge in the production of Arizona Cardinals commemorative merchandise, boosting team morale and ultimately contributing to their success on the field. Who knew that administrative professionals would end up being the real MVPs for the Cardinals?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that depicts a futuristic courthouse in Arizona, where court and municipal clerks are diligently managing paperwork and records with advanced technology. In the background, a triumphant scene unfolds on a nearby football field, where the Arizona Cardinals celebrate a victorious game. The clerks' precision in record-keeping and managing penalties seamlessly contributes to the team's success, as their expertise directly impacts the Cardinals' winning strategies. The visual should capture the synergy between the clerks' meticulous work and the football team's triumph, showcasing a harmonious blend of futuristic legal administration and sporting achievement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Glitch art Cubism Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals, in the following situation: Because the increase in court and municipal clerks in Arizona led to more efficient organization and record-keeping, the Arizona Cardinals were able to file a record number of successful "defense" strategies, resulting in a winning season. The clerks' expertise in "keeping score" and "managing penalties" inadvertently translated to the gridiron, giving the Cardinals a competitive edge.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling courthouse in Arizona, a team of court and municipal clerks diligently manages paperwork and records, ensuring a smooth and efficient legal process. Meanwhile, on a nearby football field, the Arizona Cardinals celebrate a victorious game, their win tally increasing with each successful "defense" strategy. The clerks' precision and expertise in record-keeping inadvertently contributes to the team's success, as their knack for managing penalties and keeping score translates into a winning season for the Cardinals.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling courthouse in Arizona, a team of court and municipal clerks diligently manages paperwork and records, ensuring a smooth and efficient legal process. Meanwhile, on a nearby football field, the Arizona Cardinals celebrate a victorious game, their win tally increasing with each successful "defense" strategy. The clerks' precision and expertise in record-keeping inadvertently contributes to the team's success, as their knack for managing penalties and keeping score translates into a winning season for the Cardinals. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that depicts a futuristic courthouse in Arizona, where court and municipal clerks are diligently managing paperwork and records with advanced technology. In the background, a triumphant scene unfolds on a nearby football field, where the Arizona Cardinals celebrate a victorious game. The clerks' precision in record-keeping and managing penalties seamlessly contributes to the team's success, as their expertise directly impacts the Cardinals' winning strategies. The visual should capture the synergy between the clerks' meticulous work and the football team's triumph, showcasing a harmonious blend of futuristic legal administration and sporting achievement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona positively influenced Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

The Journal of Eccentric Anthropological Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the curious world of statistical analysis, where logic and reason reign supreme, there are moments when the data decides to pull a prank on researchers. It's precisely in these moments that we find ourselves scratching our heads in disbelief, wondering if the numbers have a sense of humor. Our study seeks to shed light on such an improbable pairing - the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal victories of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals.

Take a moment to envision this whimsical scenario: a mild-mannered court clerk furiously typing away at legal documents, perhaps juggling a stapler for good measure, and miles away, athletes clad in Cardinal red and white, engaging in a heart-stopping game of pigskin prowess. Two seemingly incongruous worlds collide, compelling our team to delve into the data with an earnestness usually reserved for more conventional research subjects.

As we donned our lab coats and playoff jerseys, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. The journey, though filled with the seriousness of number-crunching, soon introduced unexpected comedic twists that left us gasping for air amidst our laughter.

With an arched eyebrow and a raised p-value, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, along with a p-value that giggled gleefully at being less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Such revelations did more than just raise eyebrows – they nearly caused a collective snort of disbelief across the research team. The juxtaposition of ink-stained court clerks with touchdown-scoring behemoths may have seemed like a statistical misdirect, but our findings remind us that the realm of numbers has a knack for defying expectations.

Our aim is not merely to present dry data, but to infuse our academic pursuits with a lighthearted perspective, proving that even the oddest pairings can lead to captivating discoveries. So join us on this unconventional voyage, where the study of court clerks and football wins intersects in a manner that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity. Brace yourselves, dear readers, because we're about to unravel a correlation that may just be more surprising than a fleet-footed touchdown dive!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the curious world of statistical analysis, where logic and reason reign supreme, there are moments when the data decides to pull a prank on researchers. It's precisely in these moments that we find ourselves scratching our heads in disbelief, wondering if the numbers have a sense of humor. Our study seeks to shed light on such an improbable pairing - the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal victories of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals.
Take a moment to envision this whimsical scenario: a mild-mannered court clerk furiously typing away at legal documents, perhaps juggling a stapler for good measure, and miles away, athletes clad in Cardinal red and white, engaging in a heart-stopping game of pigskin prowess. Two seemingly incongruous worlds collide, compelling our team to delve into the data with an earnestness usually reserved for more conventional research subjects.
As we donned our lab coats and playoff jerseys, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. The journey, though filled with the seriousness of number-crunching, soon introduced unexpected comedic twists that left us gasping for air amidst our laughter.
With an arched eyebrow and a raised p-value, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, along with a p-value that giggled gleefully at being less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Such revelations did more than just raise eyebrows – they nearly caused a collective snort of disbelief across the research team. The juxtaposition of ink-stained court clerks with touchdown-scoring behemoths may have seemed like a statistical misdirect, but our findings remind us that the realm of numbers has a knack for defying expectations.
Our aim is not merely to present dry data, but to infuse our academic pursuits with a lighthearted perspective, proving that even the oddest pairings can lead to captivating discoveries. So join us on this unconventional voyage, where the study of court clerks and football wins intersects in a manner that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity. Brace yourselves, dear readers, because we're about to unravel a correlation that may just be more surprising than a fleet-footed touchdown dive!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al." the authors find a correlation between court and municipal clerks and various societal indicators, but alas, the Arizona Cardinals were not included in this serious analysis. This grave omission prompted our team to probe deeper into the literature, and what we found left us both baffled and bemused.

As we delved further into the world of clerks and cardinals, we stumbled upon "Doe's" comprehensive study on labor statistics and their impact on local economies. While Doe's work elucidated the significance of clerical staff in municipal operations, the link to football victories remained as elusive as a quarterback evading a sack. Unperturbed, our intrepid researchers searched for more literature, determined to uncover the hidden thread weaving through courtrooms and gridirons.

Turning to non-fiction works, we encountered "The League" by David Harris, which chronicles the inner workings of the NFL. While this tome provided an in-depth look at the league's operations, it failed to touch upon the clerical undercurrents that we sought to unravel. Not to be deterred, we consulted "Gridiron Genius" by Michael Lombardi, hoping to glean insights from the world of football strategy. Alas, despite Lombardi's expertise, the correlation between clerks and Cardinals remained as enigmatic as a Hail Mary pass.

In a last-ditch effort, we ventured into the realm of fiction, where we unearthed "The Firm" by John Grisham. While this legal thriller had us on the edge of our seats, it offered no clues to the peculiar alliance between clerks and Cardinals. Our foray into literary pursuits took an unexpected turn when we stumbled upon "Tales of the Gridiron Gurus" by Percy Touchdown, a whimsical collection of football fables. Despite its entertaining nature, Touchdown's tales failed to shed light on our research inquiry.

At this juncture, feeling as perplexed as a referee at a mime convention, we resorted to unorthodox methods. With a touch of absurdity, we conducted a literature review by perusing CVS receipts, hoping for a serendipitous revelation. Alas, the only correlation we found was between high-gloss dental floss and impulse purchases of snack foods.

Undeterred by the laughter bubbling up from our research team, we recognize the significance of this seemingly preposterous pursuit. Our quest to untangle the curious connection between clerks and Cardinals embodies the spirit of academic exploration, demonstrating the boundless curiosity that propels us to uncover unexpected connections, even amidst the laughter and merriment that ensue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the curious world of statistical analysis, where logic and reason reign supreme, there are moments when the data decides to pull a prank on researchers. It's precisely in these moments that we find ourselves scratching our heads in disbelief, wondering if the numbers have a sense of humor. Our study seeks to shed light on such an improbable pairing - the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal victories of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals.
Take a moment to envision this whimsical scenario: a mild-mannered court clerk furiously typing away at legal documents, perhaps juggling a stapler for good measure, and miles away, athletes clad in Cardinal red and white, engaging in a heart-stopping game of pigskin prowess. Two seemingly incongruous worlds collide, compelling our team to delve into the data with an earnestness usually reserved for more conventional research subjects.
As we donned our lab coats and playoff jerseys, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. The journey, though filled with the seriousness of number-crunching, soon introduced unexpected comedic twists that left us gasping for air amidst our laughter.
With an arched eyebrow and a raised p-value, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, along with a p-value that giggled gleefully at being less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Such revelations did more than just raise eyebrows – they nearly caused a collective snort of disbelief across the research team. The juxtaposition of ink-stained court clerks with touchdown-scoring behemoths may have seemed like a statistical misdirect, but our findings remind us that the realm of numbers has a knack for defying expectations.
Our aim is not merely to present dry data, but to infuse our academic pursuits with a lighthearted perspective, proving that even the oddest pairings can lead to captivating discoveries. So join us on this unconventional voyage, where the study of court clerks and football wins intersects in a manner that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity. Brace yourselves, dear readers, because we're about to unravel a correlation that may just be more surprising than a fleet-footed touchdown dive!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Given the unfathomable nature of our research topic, our methodology required a perfect blend of statistical rigor and whimsical creativity. We undertook a multifaceted approach to ensure the comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals. Our intrepid research team, armed with spreadsheets and football pennants, embarked on an odyssey that would make even Odysseus raise an eyebrow in puzzlement.

First and foremost, we scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the precise number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona from 2003 to 2022. Armed with calculators and an abundance of caffeinated beverages, we diligently collated this data, imagining the click-clack of courthouse keyboards merging with the thundering roar of the crowds at Cardinals games.

In tandem with our unconventional desk jockey–athlete odyssey, we dived into the depths of Pro-Football-Reference.com, harnessing the power of football statistics and player profiles. Our trusty Excel spreadsheets became an eclectic mosaic of touchdowns and typewriters, capturing the essence of this improbable coupling with gusto.

The merging of these disparate datasets, much like the merging of two worlds in a Hollywood sci-fi blockbuster, allowed us to carry out a robust statistical analysis. Utilizing complex regression models and t-tests that were as unpredictable as a Hail Mary pass, we sought to elucidate the enigma of clerks and Cardinals.

Of course, no statistical endeavor would be complete without the obligatory dance with R, Python, and a dash of SPSS. These tools, more mystical than Merlin's wand to the uninitiated, enabled us to conjure scatter plots and correlation matrices that rivalled the most intricate of tapestries.

Our methodology, shaped by an almost literary sense of adventure, sought to infuse the often-serious realm of statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy and wonder. Our data visualization techniques conjured images of court clerks throwing touchdown passes, and through it all, we emerged with findings that can only be described as more unpredictable than a flea-flicker play in overtime.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6292596, r-squared of 0.3959676, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the curious world of statistical analysis, where logic and reason reign supreme, there are moments when the data decides to pull a prank on researchers. It's precisely in these moments that we find ourselves scratching our heads in disbelief, wondering if the numbers have a sense of humor. Our study seeks to shed light on such an improbable pairing - the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal victories of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals.
Take a moment to envision this whimsical scenario: a mild-mannered court clerk furiously typing away at legal documents, perhaps juggling a stapler for good measure, and miles away, athletes clad in Cardinal red and white, engaging in a heart-stopping game of pigskin prowess. Two seemingly incongruous worlds collide, compelling our team to delve into the data with an earnestness usually reserved for more conventional research subjects.
As we donned our lab coats and playoff jerseys, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. The journey, though filled with the seriousness of number-crunching, soon introduced unexpected comedic twists that left us gasping for air amidst our laughter.
With an arched eyebrow and a raised p-value, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, along with a p-value that giggled gleefully at being less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Such revelations did more than just raise eyebrows – they nearly caused a collective snort of disbelief across the research team. The juxtaposition of ink-stained court clerks with touchdown-scoring behemoths may have seemed like a statistical misdirect, but our findings remind us that the realm of numbers has a knack for defying expectations.
Our aim is not merely to present dry data, but to infuse our academic pursuits with a lighthearted perspective, proving that even the oddest pairings can lead to captivating discoveries. So join us on this unconventional voyage, where the study of court clerks and football wins intersects in a manner that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity. Brace yourselves, dear readers, because we're about to unravel a correlation that may just be more surprising than a fleet-footed touchdown dive!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals revealed some truly fascinating, and undeniably entertaining, findings. Our research team couldn't help but chuckle at the unexpected correlation that unfolded before our eyes.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, an r-squared value of 0.3959676, and a p-value of less than 0.01, the data left us shaking our heads in disbelief as we uncovered a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of what sort of shenanigans were at play in the Grand Canyon State.

Our team is pleased to present the Fig. 1 scatterplot, showcasing the remarkable correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal victories of the Arizona Cardinals.

In the realm of statistical absurdity, where the most improbable pairings can lead to captivating discoveries, our study stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of the research world. Who would have thought that the worlds of legal paperwork and football glory would intersect in such a statistically significant manner? It seems that behind every unlikely correlation, there's a touch of statistical humor waiting to be uncovered.

In unraveling this peculiar connection, our aim is to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the academic arena, demonstrating that even the most unconventional research pursuits can yield remarkable insights. As we wrap up this study, we can't help but smile at the sheer delightful absurdity found within the world of statistical analysis. Cheers to the unexpected and the inexplicable - it seems statistical research is anything but a bore!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." the authors find a correlation between court and municipal clerks and various societal indicators, but alas, the Arizona Cardinals were not included in this serious analysis. This grave omission prompted our team to probe deeper into the literature, and what we found left us both baffled and bemused.
As we delved further into the world of clerks and cardinals, we stumbled upon "Doe's" comprehensive study on labor statistics and their impact on local economies. While Doe's work elucidated the significance of clerical staff in municipal operations, the link to football victories remained as elusive as a quarterback evading a sack. Unperturbed, our intrepid researchers searched for more literature, determined to uncover the hidden thread weaving through courtrooms and gridirons.
Turning to non-fiction works, we encountered "The League" by David Harris, which chronicles the inner workings of the NFL. While this tome provided an in-depth look at the league's operations, it failed to touch upon the clerical undercurrents that we sought to unravel. Not to be deterred, we consulted "Gridiron Genius" by Michael Lombardi, hoping to glean insights from the world of football strategy. Alas, despite Lombardi's expertise, the correlation between clerks and Cardinals remained as enigmatic as a Hail Mary pass.
In a last-ditch effort, we ventured into the realm of fiction, where we unearthed "The Firm" by John Grisham. While this legal thriller had us on the edge of our seats, it offered no clues to the peculiar alliance between clerks and Cardinals. Our foray into literary pursuits took an unexpected turn when we stumbled upon "Tales of the Gridiron Gurus" by Percy Touchdown, a whimsical collection of football fables. Despite its entertaining nature, Touchdown's tales failed to shed light on our research inquiry.
At this juncture, feeling as perplexed as a referee at a mime convention, we resorted to unorthodox methods. With a touch of absurdity, we conducted a literature review by perusing CVS receipts, hoping for a serendipitous revelation. Alas, the only correlation we found was between high-gloss dental floss and impulse purchases of snack foods.
Undeterred by the laughter bubbling up from our research team, we recognize the significance of this seemingly preposterous pursuit. Our quest to untangle the curious connection between clerks and Cardinals embodies the spirit of academic exploration, demonstrating the boundless curiosity that propels us to uncover unexpected connections, even amidst the laughter and merriment that ensue.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals revealed some truly fascinating, and undeniably entertaining, findings. Our research team couldn't help but chuckle at the unexpected correlation that unfolded before our eyes.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, an r-squared value of 0.3959676, and a p-value of less than 0.01, the data left us shaking our heads in disbelief as we uncovered a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of what sort of shenanigans were at play in the Grand Canyon State.
Our team is pleased to present the Fig. 1 scatterplot, showcasing the remarkable correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal victories of the Arizona Cardinals.
In the realm of statistical absurdity, where the most improbable pairings can lead to captivating discoveries, our study stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of the research world. Who would have thought that the worlds of legal paperwork and football glory would intersect in such a statistically significant manner? It seems that behind every unlikely correlation, there's a touch of statistical humor waiting to be uncovered.
In unraveling this peculiar connection, our aim is to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the academic arena, demonstrating that even the most unconventional research pursuits can yield remarkable insights. As we wrap up this study, we can't help but smile at the sheer delightful absurdity found within the world of statistical analysis. Cheers to the unexpected and the inexplicable - it seems statistical research is anything but a bore!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the spirit of statistical enlightenment and academic whimsy, it is with great glee that we delve into the discussion of our findings – a study that defies convention and embraces the unexpected merriment of statistical correlations. Our journey into the peculiar pairing of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals has left us astounded, bemused, and thoroughly entertained.

The lighthearted exploration of correlations has long been a staple of academic inquiry, and our study stands as a testament to the fact that statistical analysis need not be devoid of charm and humor. As we harken back to our literature review, we take a moment to reflect on the unexpected revelations and the serious pursuit of comical connections. Indeed, the literature led us on a merry chase, full of perplexing puns and whimsical wordplay. The absence of serious analyses on such an intricate matter left us no choice but to venture into the uncharted territory of "The Firm" by John Grisham and "Tales of the Gridiron Gurus" by Percy Touchdown. Little did we know that these seemingly bizarre forays would eventually guide us toward our delightfully improbable findings.

Our statistical analysis not only supported the prior research on the significance of court and municipal clerks in various societal indicators but also added a touch of statistical levity. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results elegantly dovetail with the serious pursuits that came before. It seems that our statistically significant findings have danced their way into the realm of delightful unpredictability, proving that behind every earnest pursuit lies an element of statistical humor.

In considering the implications of our findings, we are reminded that the academic world is as much a theater of amusement as it is a platform for solemn inquiry. Our research into the fantastical connection between clerks and Cardinals serves as a charming reminder that even the most whimsical of research endeavors can yield captivating insights. It appears that statistical research, far from being a dry and somber endeavor, holds within its bosom a deep well of statistical witticisms and delightful absurdity. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of statistical correlations, we raise a toast to the unexpected – for in the world of statistical analysis, there's always a touch of mirth waiting to be discovered. Cheers to the inexplicable, the whimsical, and the downright delightful!

And now, as we conclude our whimsical expedition into the realms of clerks and Cardinals, we turn our attention to the next improbable pairing awaiting our statistical scrutiny. After all, the world of statistical research is a playground of delightful absurdity, where even the most unlikely connections hold the promise of bewitching amusement and intellectual enlightenment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.

This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the curious world of statistical analysis, where logic and reason reign supreme, there are moments when the data decides to pull a prank on researchers. It's precisely in these moments that we find ourselves scratching our heads in disbelief, wondering if the numbers have a sense of humor. Our study seeks to shed light on such an improbable pairing - the correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal victories of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals.
Take a moment to envision this whimsical scenario: a mild-mannered court clerk furiously typing away at legal documents, perhaps juggling a stapler for good measure, and miles away, athletes clad in Cardinal red and white, engaging in a heart-stopping game of pigskin prowess. Two seemingly incongruous worlds collide, compelling our team to delve into the data with an earnestness usually reserved for more conventional research subjects.
As we donned our lab coats and playoff jerseys, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. The journey, though filled with the seriousness of number-crunching, soon introduced unexpected comedic twists that left us gasping for air amidst our laughter.
With an arched eyebrow and a raised p-value, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, along with a p-value that giggled gleefully at being less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Such revelations did more than just raise eyebrows – they nearly caused a collective snort of disbelief across the research team. The juxtaposition of ink-stained court clerks with touchdown-scoring behemoths may have seemed like a statistical misdirect, but our findings remind us that the realm of numbers has a knack for defying expectations.
Our aim is not merely to present dry data, but to infuse our academic pursuits with a lighthearted perspective, proving that even the oddest pairings can lead to captivating discoveries. So join us on this unconventional voyage, where the study of court clerks and football wins intersects in a manner that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity. Brace yourselves, dear readers, because we're about to unravel a correlation that may just be more surprising than a fleet-footed touchdown dive!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals revealed some truly fascinating, and undeniably entertaining, findings. Our research team couldn't help but chuckle at the unexpected correlation that unfolded before our eyes.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596, an r-squared value of 0.3959676, and a p-value of less than 0.01, the data left us shaking our heads in disbelief as we uncovered a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of what sort of shenanigans were at play in the Grand Canyon State.
Our team is pleased to present the Fig. 1 scatterplot, showcasing the remarkable correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal victories of the Arizona Cardinals.
In the realm of statistical absurdity, where the most improbable pairings can lead to captivating discoveries, our study stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of the research world. Who would have thought that the worlds of legal paperwork and football glory would intersect in such a statistically significant manner? It seems that behind every unlikely correlation, there's a touch of statistical humor waiting to be uncovered.
In unraveling this peculiar connection, our aim is to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the academic arena, demonstrating that even the most unconventional research pursuits can yield remarkable insights. As we wrap up this study, we can't help but smile at the sheer delightful absurdity found within the world of statistical analysis. Cheers to the unexpected and the inexplicable - it seems statistical research is anything but a bore!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the connection between the number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona and the seasonal wins of the Arizona Cardinals has left us not only scratching our heads in disbelief but also reveling in the comedy of statistical absurdity. We must admit, our findings have thrown quite the curveball, making us ponder the playful shenanigans at play in the Grand Canyon State. The correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 and the gleeful p-value of less than 0.01 have brought unexpected amusement to our otherwise serious exploration.

Upon reflection, it appears that the realm of statistical analysis is not without its own brand of whimsical irony. Who would have thought that the worlds of legal paperwork and football glory would intertwine with such statistical exuberance? It seems that behind every quirky correlation, there's a touch of statistical humor just waiting to be uncovered. Our Fig. 1 scatterplot stands as a delightful testament to the delightful unpredictability of the research world.

As we close the playbook on this unanticipated journey, we are inclined to issue a cheerful salute to the confounding and the inexplicable - it appears that statistical research is far from the mundane task it is often made out to be. Therefore, we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary, as we have likely reached the peak of statistical hilarity. And remember, dear readers, in the grand game of statistics, peculiar connections can often yield entertaining and unforeseen insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Anthropological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Quirky Clerks and Cardinal Perks: Exploring the Link Between Arizona Court and Municipal Clerks and the Wins of the Arizona Cardinals with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the curious correlation between the number of court and municipal clerks in the state of Arizona and the seasonal wins of the NFL's Arizona Cardinals. Our research team, donning lab coats and football jerseys, utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to unravel this quirky conundrum. Despite the serious nature of the data sources, our findings yielded unexpected comedic twists and turns.
Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6292596 along with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2022. Our results not only left us scratching our heads in disbelief but also pondering what sort of game of pigskin and paperwork magic may be afoot in the Grand Canyon State. The juxtaposition of court clerks and football wins may seem like an odd coupling, but the numbers don't lie – they just love to throw us a curveball.
This paper aims to inject a lighthearted and whimsical perspective into the realm of academic research, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fascinating discoveries. So grab your clipboard and a foam finger, because we're about to embark on a research journey that can only be described as a touchdown in the world of statistical absurdity.

ChatGPT:

Arizona, court clerks, municipal clerks, Arizona Cardinals, NFL, wins, correlation, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Pro-Football-Reference, Grand Canyon State

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of court, municipal, and license clerks in Arizona
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona

Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals
Detailed data title: Number of season wins by the Arizona Cardinals
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals

Correlation r = 0.6292596 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3959676 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 39.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.003. 0.0029528757856260250000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.3% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 339 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.26, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona (Laborers)28902820263022502420273031002900276030603440344039403620332025102660291028802660
Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals (Cardinals wins)4655891058510111378358114




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2890,2820,2630,2250,2420,2730,3100,2900,2760,3060,3440,3440,3940,3620,3320,2510,2660,2910,2880,2660,])
array_2 = np.array([4,6,5,5,8,9,10,5,8,5,10,11,13,7,8,3,5,8,11,4,])
array_1_name = "The number of court and municipal clerks in Arizona"
array_2_name = "Season wins for the Arizona Cardinals"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3518 · Black Variable ID: 5001 · Red Variable ID: 19648
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0