about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,517 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and the second variable is Total runs scored in the World Series.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

With cleaner air, the baseballs in the World Series were less weighed down by pollution particles, allowing them to travel through the air with less resistance. This led to fewer runs being scored as the lighter, cleaner baseballs didn't carry as much momentum when hit, causing them to fall short of home runs and extra-base hits.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image using the style "inspired by bauhaus" depicting a surreal baseball scene in Taos, New Mexico. The clear blue sky dominates the canvas, with a minimalistic, abstract depiction of a baseball stadium in the distance. Players, represented in a stylized and geometric form, take the field for the World Series under the bright, stylized sun. The surrounding landscape features angular mountain silhouettes against the horizon, emphasizing the pristine, clean air of the environment. The game unfolds with geometric precision and focus, reflected in the players' movements and the overall composition, resulting in a visually impactful representation of the unique World Series setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Macabre Celtic art Cubism
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series, in the following situation: Because the decrease in air pollution in Taos, New Mexico led to clearer skies, the baseball players were less likely to "strike out" and more likely to "hit a home run," resulting in a decrease in total runs scored in the World Series.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A clear blue sky stretches over the baseball stadium in Taos, New Mexico, as players take the field for the World Series. In the distance, the air appears clean and fresh, with the mountains standing tall against the backdrop. The game unfolds under the bright sunshine, with players swinging with focus and precision, resulting in fewer runs scored overall in the World Series.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: A clear blue sky stretches over the baseball stadium in Taos, New Mexico, as players take the field for the World Series. In the distance, the air appears clean and fresh, with the mountains standing tall against the backdrop. The game unfolds under the bright sunshine, with players swinging with focus and precision, resulting in fewer runs scored overall in the World Series. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image using the style "inspired by bauhaus" depicting a surreal baseball scene in Taos, New Mexico. The clear blue sky dominates the canvas, with a minimalistic, abstract depiction of a baseball stadium in the distance. Players, represented in a stylized and geometric form, take the field for the World Series under the bright, stylized sun. The surrounding landscape features angular mountain silhouettes against the horizon, emphasizing the pristine, clean air of the environment. The game unfolds with geometric precision and focus, reflected in the players' movements and the overall composition, resulting in a visually impactful representation of the unique World Series setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico caused Total runs scored in the World Series to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

Journal of Unlikely Correlations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Air pollution is a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for public health and the environment. While its detrimental effects on respiratory health and ecological systems are well-documented, its potential influence on seemingly unrelated phenomena remains a subject of inquiry. In the realm of sports, the World Series stands as a pinnacle of athletic competition, where each run scored can tip the scales of victory. Taos, New Mexico, known for its picturesque landscapes and artistic community, also grapples with air pollution levels that fluctuate like the erratic flight of a knuckleball. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series, aiming to shed light on a connection as elusive as a stolen base and as impactful as a grand slam.

The endeavor to uncover this unexpected association was not undertaken lightly. It marries the disciplines of environmental science and sports analytics in a manner reminiscent of a surprising double play. Our curiosity was piqued by the possibility that the unseen particles in the air may hold sway over the velocity and trajectory of baseballs in the games that captivate audiences worldwide. While the notion may provoke skepticism akin to that inspired by a long-held superstition in baseball, the data tell a story that demands consideration. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding—or, in this case, in the regression analysis and statistical tests.

This paper presents the findings of an exhaustive investigation, where we have sought to disentangle the complexities of atmospheric composition and athletic prowess. Drawing from data meticulously gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives and the hallowed annals of World Series statistics, we have endeavored to bring clarity to a topic as nebulous as an outfielder's attempt to track a fly ball in the sun. The results of our analysis, akin to a well-timed double play, reveal a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes, despite the improbable nature of the association itself.

In the following sections, we shall delve into the methodology employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this serendipitous discovery. As we engage in this scholarly pursuit, we invite readers to embrace the spirit of inquiry and introspection, much like a pitcher puzzling over the enigmatic movement of a knuckleball. For the connection between the air in Taos and the runs on the baseball diamond is as enigmatic as a curveball in the dirt, yet as palpable as the crack of a bat meeting a well-thrown fastball.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for public health and the environment. While its detrimental effects on respiratory health and ecological systems are well-documented, its potential influence on seemingly unrelated phenomena remains a subject of inquiry. In the realm of sports, the World Series stands as a pinnacle of athletic competition, where each run scored can tip the scales of victory. Taos, New Mexico, known for its picturesque landscapes and artistic community, also grapples with air pollution levels that fluctuate like the erratic flight of a knuckleball. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series, aiming to shed light on a connection as elusive as a stolen base and as impactful as a grand slam.
The endeavor to uncover this unexpected association was not undertaken lightly. It marries the disciplines of environmental science and sports analytics in a manner reminiscent of a surprising double play. Our curiosity was piqued by the possibility that the unseen particles in the air may hold sway over the velocity and trajectory of baseballs in the games that captivate audiences worldwide. While the notion may provoke skepticism akin to that inspired by a long-held superstition in baseball, the data tell a story that demands consideration. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding—or, in this case, in the regression analysis and statistical tests.
This paper presents the findings of an exhaustive investigation, where we have sought to disentangle the complexities of atmospheric composition and athletic prowess. Drawing from data meticulously gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives and the hallowed annals of World Series statistics, we have endeavored to bring clarity to a topic as nebulous as an outfielder's attempt to track a fly ball in the sun. The results of our analysis, akin to a well-timed double play, reveal a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes, despite the improbable nature of the association itself.
In the following sections, we shall delve into the methodology employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this serendipitous discovery. As we engage in this scholarly pursuit, we invite readers to embrace the spirit of inquiry and introspection, much like a pitcher puzzling over the enigmatic movement of a knuckleball. For the connection between the air in Taos and the runs on the baseball diamond is as enigmatic as a curveball in the dirt, yet as palpable as the crack of a bat meeting a well-thrown fastball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature pertaining to the connection between air pollution and sporting events is, much like a well-thrown curveball, varied and complex. A cursory review of the existing research reveals a preponderance of studies focusing on the health effects of air pollution and the environmental consequences, with scant attention given to its potential impact on athletic outcomes. Nonetheless, our search yielded several relevant sources that have contributed to our understanding of this unorthodox relationship.

In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Athletic Performance," Smith investigates the effects of air pollution on athletes' endurance and respiratory function. While the study primarily examines individual sports, the findings underscore the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic outcomes. Furthermore, Doe et al., in "Air Quality and Outdoor Recreation," delve into the broader implications of air quality on outdoor activities, shedding light on the interconnectedness of environmental conditions and physical endeavors.

Expanding our scope to include diverse sources, we turn to non-fiction books such as "Air Pollution and Its Impacts on Sports Events" by Jones, which, though focused on a different sport, provides insight into the broader implications of atmospheric conditions on athletic competitions. Additionally, "Taos and Its Environmental Challenges" by Green offers a comprehensive exploration of the environmental factors affecting Taos, including air quality, thus laying the groundwork for our investigation.

On a more playful note, fiction works such as "The Air Affair: A Baseball Mystery" by Brown and "Pitching Purity: A Tale of Pollution and Baseball" by White, while not grounded in empirical research, offer imaginative narratives that intertwine air pollution and baseball. Despite their fictitious nature, they exemplify the intriguing possibilities of blending environmental concerns with sports themes, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of our inquiry.

Turning to the digital sphere, popular internet memes such as "Air Pollution: Not Just Blowing Smoke" and "Baseball Bats vs. Pollution: The Ultimate Showdown" reflect the public's engagement with the juxtaposition of environmental issues and sports in a lighthearted manner. While not scholarly in nature, these memes encapsulate the quirky allure of our research topic, invoking humor and curiosity in equal measure.

As we navigate this scholarly landscape, much akin to a player navigating the bases, we encounter a diverse array of perspectives, from empirical studies to fictional narratives and online humor. The amalgamation of these sources sets the stage for our own investigation, offering a glimpse into the multifaceted dimensions of the air pollution–baseball dynamic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 2002 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for public health and the environment. While its detrimental effects on respiratory health and ecological systems are well-documented, its potential influence on seemingly unrelated phenomena remains a subject of inquiry. In the realm of sports, the World Series stands as a pinnacle of athletic competition, where each run scored can tip the scales of victory. Taos, New Mexico, known for its picturesque landscapes and artistic community, also grapples with air pollution levels that fluctuate like the erratic flight of a knuckleball. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series, aiming to shed light on a connection as elusive as a stolen base and as impactful as a grand slam.
The endeavor to uncover this unexpected association was not undertaken lightly. It marries the disciplines of environmental science and sports analytics in a manner reminiscent of a surprising double play. Our curiosity was piqued by the possibility that the unseen particles in the air may hold sway over the velocity and trajectory of baseballs in the games that captivate audiences worldwide. While the notion may provoke skepticism akin to that inspired by a long-held superstition in baseball, the data tell a story that demands consideration. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding—or, in this case, in the regression analysis and statistical tests.
This paper presents the findings of an exhaustive investigation, where we have sought to disentangle the complexities of atmospheric composition and athletic prowess. Drawing from data meticulously gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives and the hallowed annals of World Series statistics, we have endeavored to bring clarity to a topic as nebulous as an outfielder's attempt to track a fly ball in the sun. The results of our analysis, akin to a well-timed double play, reveal a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes, despite the improbable nature of the association itself.
In the following sections, we shall delve into the methodology employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this serendipitous discovery. As we engage in this scholarly pursuit, we invite readers to embrace the spirit of inquiry and introspection, much like a pitcher puzzling over the enigmatic movement of a knuckleball. For the connection between the air in Taos and the runs on the baseball diamond is as enigmatic as a curveball in the dirt, yet as palpable as the crack of a bat meeting a well-thrown fastball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study aimed to rigorously elucidate the potential relationship between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and the total runs scored in the World Series. Data on air quality parameters, such as particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide, were obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives for the years 2002 to 2013. These data were then supplemented with information from reputable sources, primarily Wikipedia, for comprehensive coverage of air pollution levels in Taos during the specified period.

To measure the total runs scored in the World Series, a comprehensive compilation of game-by-game scoring statistics was meticulously gathered from official records and historical sources. Furthermore, meticulous attention was given to account for any potential confounding variables, such as weather conditions, stadium characteristics, and team compositions, which could impinge upon the relationship under scrutiny.

Employing a multi-stage approach akin to the progression of a baseball game, the collected data underwent stringent quality assurance protocols to ensure its reliability and accuracy. This process mirrored the scrutiny applied to an infield fly, leaving no room for error or oversight. With the data vetted and validated, the analytical framework was constructed, integrating a series of statistical methods that liken the intricate interplay of variables to the tactical maneuvers of a seasoned baseball team.

Firstly, an exploratory data analysis was conducted to discern any discernible patterns or trends in the datasets. Then, employing a robust correlation analysis, the relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series was delineated. The findings were supported by a regression analysis, akin to a seasoned batter studying the throws of a skilled pitcher, to ascertain the magnitude and direction of the association under investigation.

It is noteworthy that the selection of Taos, New Mexico, as the focal point of this study was not arbitrary, but rather informed by its unique geographical and meteorological characteristics, akin to the selection of a specialized player for a particular infield position. Such considerations aimed to minimize confounding influences and enhance the internal validity of the findings.

Lastly, to contextualize the results of the analysis, a comparative assessment was devised, drawing parallels between the observed relationship and analogous phenomena in other sporting events. This comparative perspective provided a broadened canvas for interpreting the implications of the findings, akin to the broadening of a strike zone by an umpire in response to changing game dynamics.

In summation, the research methodology adopted for this study adhered to the highest standards of rigor and precision, akin to the steadfast adherence to rules and regulations that govern the world of baseball. The meticulous collection, scrutiny, and analysis of data mirror the dedication and meticulousness exemplified by athletes and fans alike. The subsequent sections shall elucidate the findings of the analysis, weaving together the threads of air pollution and baseball with a finesse reminiscent of a meticulously executed double play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2002 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.7292442, r-squared of 0.5317970, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Air pollution is a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for public health and the environment. While its detrimental effects on respiratory health and ecological systems are well-documented, its potential influence on seemingly unrelated phenomena remains a subject of inquiry. In the realm of sports, the World Series stands as a pinnacle of athletic competition, where each run scored can tip the scales of victory. Taos, New Mexico, known for its picturesque landscapes and artistic community, also grapples with air pollution levels that fluctuate like the erratic flight of a knuckleball. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series, aiming to shed light on a connection as elusive as a stolen base and as impactful as a grand slam.
The endeavor to uncover this unexpected association was not undertaken lightly. It marries the disciplines of environmental science and sports analytics in a manner reminiscent of a surprising double play. Our curiosity was piqued by the possibility that the unseen particles in the air may hold sway over the velocity and trajectory of baseballs in the games that captivate audiences worldwide. While the notion may provoke skepticism akin to that inspired by a long-held superstition in baseball, the data tell a story that demands consideration. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding—or, in this case, in the regression analysis and statistical tests.
This paper presents the findings of an exhaustive investigation, where we have sought to disentangle the complexities of atmospheric composition and athletic prowess. Drawing from data meticulously gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives and the hallowed annals of World Series statistics, we have endeavored to bring clarity to a topic as nebulous as an outfielder's attempt to track a fly ball in the sun. The results of our analysis, akin to a well-timed double play, reveal a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes, despite the improbable nature of the association itself.
In the following sections, we shall delve into the methodology employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this serendipitous discovery. As we engage in this scholarly pursuit, we invite readers to embrace the spirit of inquiry and introspection, much like a pitcher puzzling over the enigmatic movement of a knuckleball. For the connection between the air in Taos and the runs on the baseball diamond is as enigmatic as a curveball in the dirt, yet as palpable as the crack of a bat meeting a well-thrown fastball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a notably strong correlation between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and the total runs scored in the World Series for the years 2002 to 2013. The correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 emphasizes a significant positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5317970, denoting that approximately 53.18% of the variability in total runs scored can be explained by air pollution levels in Taos. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, further solidifying the robustness of the findings.

Notably, the observed correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series defies conventional expectations and may prompt renewed contemplation of unorthodox influences on athletic performance. The apparent association, although as unexpected as a bunt from a power hitter, underscores the intricate interplay of environmental factors and sporting outcomes.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series, illustrating the cohesion between these seemingly incongruous elements. The scatterplot reaffirms the substantive relationship identified through statistical analysis and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected nature of this correlation.

This unanticipated linkage between air pollution in a New Mexican town and the performance on the grand stage of the World Series posits an intriguing proposition for scholarly discourse and a lighthearted reflection on the idiosyncratic dynamics of environmental and sporting phenomena. The implications of this unorthodox association undoubtedly evoke a sense of wonderment, akin to the excitement of experiencing a rare inside-the-park home run.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature pertaining to the connection between air pollution and sporting events is, much like a well-thrown curveball, varied and complex. A cursory review of the existing research reveals a preponderance of studies focusing on the health effects of air pollution and the environmental consequences, with scant attention given to its potential impact on athletic outcomes. Nonetheless, our search yielded several relevant sources that have contributed to our understanding of this unorthodox relationship.
In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Athletic Performance," Smith investigates the effects of air pollution on athletes' endurance and respiratory function. While the study primarily examines individual sports, the findings underscore the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic outcomes. Furthermore, Doe et al., in "Air Quality and Outdoor Recreation," delve into the broader implications of air quality on outdoor activities, shedding light on the interconnectedness of environmental conditions and physical endeavors.
Expanding our scope to include diverse sources, we turn to non-fiction books such as "Air Pollution and Its Impacts on Sports Events" by Jones, which, though focused on a different sport, provides insight into the broader implications of atmospheric conditions on athletic competitions. Additionally, "Taos and Its Environmental Challenges" by Green offers a comprehensive exploration of the environmental factors affecting Taos, including air quality, thus laying the groundwork for our investigation.
On a more playful note, fiction works such as "The Air Affair: A Baseball Mystery" by Brown and "Pitching Purity: A Tale of Pollution and Baseball" by White, while not grounded in empirical research, offer imaginative narratives that intertwine air pollution and baseball. Despite their fictitious nature, they exemplify the intriguing possibilities of blending environmental concerns with sports themes, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of our inquiry.
Turning to the digital sphere, popular internet memes such as "Air Pollution: Not Just Blowing Smoke" and "Baseball Bats vs. Pollution: The Ultimate Showdown" reflect the public's engagement with the juxtaposition of environmental issues and sports in a lighthearted manner. While not scholarly in nature, these memes encapsulate the quirky allure of our research topic, invoking humor and curiosity in equal measure.
As we navigate this scholarly landscape, much akin to a player navigating the bases, we encounter a diverse array of perspectives, from empirical studies to fictional narratives and online humor. The amalgamation of these sources sets the stage for our own investigation, offering a glimpse into the multifaceted dimensions of the air pollution–baseball dynamic.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a notably strong correlation between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and the total runs scored in the World Series for the years 2002 to 2013. The correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 emphasizes a significant positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5317970, denoting that approximately 53.18% of the variability in total runs scored can be explained by air pollution levels in Taos. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, further solidifying the robustness of the findings.
Notably, the observed correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series defies conventional expectations and may prompt renewed contemplation of unorthodox influences on athletic performance. The apparent association, although as unexpected as a bunt from a power hitter, underscores the intricate interplay of environmental factors and sporting outcomes.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series, illustrating the cohesion between these seemingly incongruous elements. The scatterplot reaffirms the substantive relationship identified through statistical analysis and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected nature of this correlation.
This unanticipated linkage between air pollution in a New Mexican town and the performance on the grand stage of the World Series posits an intriguing proposition for scholarly discourse and a lighthearted reflection on the idiosyncratic dynamics of environmental and sporting phenomena. The implications of this unorthodox association undoubtedly evoke a sense of wonderment, akin to the excitement of experiencing a rare inside-the-park home run.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The significant correlation between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and total runs scored in the World Series for the years 2002 to 2013 is as surprising as a well-executed hidden ball trick, challenging conventional notions of environmental influences on athletic performance. These findings lend empirical weight to the seemingly whimsical musings encapsulated in the literature, where, much like a knuckleball, the relationship between air pollution and sporting events is enshrouded in intrigue and uncertainty. The strong correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 echoes the sentiments expressed in the non-fiction narrative "The Impact of Air Pollution on Athletic Performance" by Smith, asserting that environmental factors may indeed exert a palpable influence on athletic outcomes. This unexpected alliance between air pollution and runs scored in the World Series not only supports the existing research but also introduces a breath of fresh air into the dialogue surrounding the multifaceted interplay of atmospheric conditions and athletic achievements.

The robustness of the observed correlation, as evidenced by the high r-squared value of 0.5317970, underscores the substantial explanatory power of air pollution levels in Taos, explaining approximately 53.18% of the variability in total runs scored. This mirrors the prescient observations articulated in the engaging internet memes "Air Pollution: Not Just Blowing Smoke" and "Baseball Bats vs. Pollution: The Ultimate Showdown," where the public's playful engagement with the interaction between environmental concerns and sporting events prefigures the empirical evidence unveiled in this study. The results courteously invite us to consider the impact of air pollution akin to the impact of a well-placed bunt, influencing the course of the game in unexpected ways.

The p-value of less than 0.01 fortifies the empirical foundation of the identified correlation, echoing the scholarly rigor enshrined in the non-fiction narrative "Taos and Its Environmental Challenges" by Green. The unexpected linkage between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored further substantiates the interdisciplinary nature of our inquiry, resonating with the imaginative narratives presented in "The Air Affair: A Baseball Mystery" by Brown and "Pitching Purity: A Tale of Pollution and Baseball" by White. This unexpected intersection of seemingly disparate domains encapsulates the enigmatic allure of scholarly research, much like the thrill of uncovering an overlooked Easter egg during an academic quest.

The implications of this unorthodox association between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series extend beyond scholarly discourse, offering a veritable home run in prompting society to reflect on the idiosyncratic dynamics of environmental and sporting phenomena. The visual representation of the correlation through the scatterplot serves as a testament to the intrinsic fascination underlying this peculiar relationship, much like the visual spectacle of a majestic home run soaring over the outfield fence. This study thus opens the door to a breath of fresh air in our comprehension of the interplay between environmental conditions and athletic prowess, inviting a renewed sense of wonder akin to the charm of witnessing a rare inside-the-park home run.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Air pollution is a pressing global issue with far-reaching implications for public health and the environment. While its detrimental effects on respiratory health and ecological systems are well-documented, its potential influence on seemingly unrelated phenomena remains a subject of inquiry. In the realm of sports, the World Series stands as a pinnacle of athletic competition, where each run scored can tip the scales of victory. Taos, New Mexico, known for its picturesque landscapes and artistic community, also grapples with air pollution levels that fluctuate like the erratic flight of a knuckleball. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Taos and the total runs scored in the World Series, aiming to shed light on a connection as elusive as a stolen base and as impactful as a grand slam.
The endeavor to uncover this unexpected association was not undertaken lightly. It marries the disciplines of environmental science and sports analytics in a manner reminiscent of a surprising double play. Our curiosity was piqued by the possibility that the unseen particles in the air may hold sway over the velocity and trajectory of baseballs in the games that captivate audiences worldwide. While the notion may provoke skepticism akin to that inspired by a long-held superstition in baseball, the data tell a story that demands consideration. As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding—or, in this case, in the regression analysis and statistical tests.
This paper presents the findings of an exhaustive investigation, where we have sought to disentangle the complexities of atmospheric composition and athletic prowess. Drawing from data meticulously gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency's archives and the hallowed annals of World Series statistics, we have endeavored to bring clarity to a topic as nebulous as an outfielder's attempt to track a fly ball in the sun. The results of our analysis, akin to a well-timed double play, reveal a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes, despite the improbable nature of the association itself.
In the following sections, we shall delve into the methodology employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this serendipitous discovery. As we engage in this scholarly pursuit, we invite readers to embrace the spirit of inquiry and introspection, much like a pitcher puzzling over the enigmatic movement of a knuckleball. For the connection between the air in Taos and the runs on the baseball diamond is as enigmatic as a curveball in the dirt, yet as palpable as the crack of a bat meeting a well-thrown fastball.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a notably strong correlation between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and the total runs scored in the World Series for the years 2002 to 2013. The correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 emphasizes a significant positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5317970, denoting that approximately 53.18% of the variability in total runs scored can be explained by air pollution levels in Taos. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, further solidifying the robustness of the findings.
Notably, the observed correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series defies conventional expectations and may prompt renewed contemplation of unorthodox influences on athletic performance. The apparent association, although as unexpected as a bunt from a power hitter, underscores the intricate interplay of environmental factors and sporting outcomes.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Taos and total runs scored in the World Series, illustrating the cohesion between these seemingly incongruous elements. The scatterplot reaffirms the substantive relationship identified through statistical analysis and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected nature of this correlation.
This unanticipated linkage between air pollution in a New Mexican town and the performance on the grand stage of the World Series posits an intriguing proposition for scholarly discourse and a lighthearted reflection on the idiosyncratic dynamics of environmental and sporting phenomena. The implications of this unorthodox association undoubtedly evoke a sense of wonderment, akin to the excitement of experiencing a rare inside-the-park home run.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has elucidated a substantive and unexpected relationship between air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and the total runs scored in the World Series. The robust correlation coefficient and the p-value below 0.01 affirm a significant positive association, suggesting that the air in Taos may indeed hold sway over the scoring dynamics of the pinnacle of baseball competition. This unorthodox link, akin to a well-executed pickoff play, offers a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental variables and athletic performance.

The results of our analysis, resembling a perfectly executed double play, underscore the need to consider unconventional influences on sporting outcomes. This peculiar association prompts reflection on the countless atmospheric elements that may subtly influence the trajectory of a baseball, much like the unpredictable flight of a knuckleball. Although as surprising as an inside-the-park home run, this finding invites playful speculation on the nuanced interactions between environmental nuances and athletic achievements.

While the connection between air pollution in Taos and runs scored in the World Series may initially seem as fleeting as a stolen base, our research endeavors have compellingly demonstrated its substantive nature. This unanticipated relationship, reminiscent of an unexpected squeeze play, offers a thought-provoking avenue for further scholarly exploration and perhaps a lighthearted caper into the eccentricities of sports and environmental research.

It is our fervent recommendation that future inquiries delve deeper into this atypical alliance, akin to a seasoned batter adjusting to the unconventional movements of a knuckleball. However, it is our firm belief, much like a steadfast outfielder tracking a fly ball, that no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Unlikely Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Atmospheric and Sporting Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Affair: The Relationship Between Air Pollution in Taos, New Mexico, and Total Runs Scored in the World Series with an abstract of This study seeks to investigate the impact of air pollution in Taos, New Mexico, on the total runs scored in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.7292442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2013 was determined. While the connection may seem as fleeting as a pop fly, our findings suggest a significant relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of this peculiar association are as up in the air as a knuckleball, leaving room for further playful exploration and, dare we say, a breath of fresh air in the field of sports and environmental research.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Taos, New Mexico, World Series, total runs scored, correlation coefficient, Environmental Protection Agency, Wikipedia, impact, association, sports, environmental research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Taos, NM
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico

Total runs scored in the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Total runs scored in the World Series

Correlation r = 0.7292442 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5317970 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 53.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total runs scored in the World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico) over the 12 years from 2002 through 2013.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0071. 0.0071190091793759950000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 0.71% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 140 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.27, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013
Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico (Bad air quality days)0.003134800000000000
Total runs scored in the World Series (Runs scored)853836343339395941682241




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0031348,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([85,38,36,34,33,39,39,59,41,68,22,41,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Total runs scored in the World Series"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3517 · Black Variable ID: 22261 · Red Variable ID: 536
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0