Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the knowledge of biological science in Alabama dwindled, there were fewer individuals capable of understanding the subtle nuances of sarcasm. This led to a decline in demand for xkcd comics about sarcasm, prompting the creators to focus on other, more universally understandable, topics. Instead of laughing at biology-related sarcastic jokes in an informed manner, the audience had to shift their attention to general humor, much to the dismay of science enthusiasts. It was a real-life demonstration of natural selection, where only the most relatable and broadly comical comics survived in the academic ecosystem of entertainment.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover, featuring a quiet lecture hall at an Alabama university. The setting should show empty seats and a diminishing number of biology professors in attendance. Additionally, incorporate elements of dry humor by including xkcd comics about sarcasm becoming less frequent. The scene should exude a sense of solitude and wittiness, capturing the atmosphere of the deserted lecture hall with a subtle touch of humor. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave A TIME magazine cover image Cubism Voxel art Macabre
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm, in the following situation: As the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama decreased, there was a corresponding decline in xkcd comics about sarcasm because the teachers were the primary audience for such dry humor, leaving the creator with no one to appreciate their wit.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet lecture hall at an Alabama university, fewer and fewer biology professors were attending. Alongside, the witty xkcd comics about sarcasm were becoming less frequent, leaving a sense of dry humor echoing through the empty seats.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet lecture hall at an Alabama university, fewer and fewer biology professors were attending. Alongside, the witty xkcd comics about sarcasm were becoming less frequent, leaving a sense of dry humor echoing through the empty seats. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover, featuring a quiet lecture hall at an Alabama university. The setting should show empty seats and a diminishing number of biology professors in attendance. Additionally, incorporate elements of dry humor by including xkcd comics about sarcasm becoming less frequent. The scene should exude a sense of solitude and wittiness, capturing the atmosphere of the deserted lecture hall with a subtle touch of humor.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama caused xkcd comics published about sarcasm to decrease. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study Journal of Southern Biology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of academia - where we are as interested in correlations between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm as we are in a good dad joke. "Why did the photon check into a hotel? Because it needed some rest mass!"
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the academic professionals teaching cellular respiration and the snarky musings of Randall Munroe, the creative mind behind xkcd. "What do you call a group of musical whales? An orca-stra!"
While it may seem as unrelated as a fish riding a bicycle, we embarked on this research endeavor with the intention of bringing a lighthearted touch to the often serious landscape of academic investigation. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Our findings, fueled by the compelling combination of Bureau of Labor Statistics data and an AI-powered examination of xkcd comics, have unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. "What did the biologist wear to impress their date? Designer genes."
These results not only give us a chuckle but also pave the way for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and implications of this peculiar correlation. As we venture into the depths of this unusual connection, we are reminded of the timeless words of Mark Twain, a man who surely appreciated a good jest, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of academia - where we are as interested in correlations between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm as we are in a good dad joke. "Why did the photon check into a hotel? Because it needed some rest mass!"
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the academic professionals teaching cellular respiration and the snarky musings of Randall Munroe, the creative mind behind xkcd. "What do you call a group of musical whales? An orca-stra!"
While it may seem as unrelated as a fish riding a bicycle, we embarked on this research endeavor with the intention of bringing a lighthearted touch to the often serious landscape of academic investigation. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Our findings, fueled by the compelling combination of Bureau of Labor Statistics data and an AI-powered examination of xkcd comics, have unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. "What did the biologist wear to impress their date? Designer genes."
These results not only give us a chuckle but also pave the way for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and implications of this peculiar correlation. As we venture into the depths of this unusual connection, we are reminded of the timeless words of Mark Twain, a man who surely appreciated a good jest, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly studies have probed the relationship between academic faculty demographics and cultural phenomena with diverse conclusions. Smith et al. investigated the influence of regional variations in science education on societal humor patterns, finding some intriguing but ambiguous correlations (Smith et al., 2015). Additionally, Doe and Jones examined the impact of academic environments on the prevalence of internet memes depicting scientific concepts, shedding light on the changing landscape of digital humor (Doe & Jones, 2018). "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Moving beyond academia, in the realm of non-fiction, books such as "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins and "The Biology of Belief" by Bruce H. Lipton have tackled the complexity of biological concepts, providing insights into the fertile ground for literary humor (Dawkins, 1976; Lipton, 2005). On the fictional front, works like "Micro" by Michael Crichton and "Jurassic Park" by the same author resonate with biological themes, offering a creative playground for quirky connections (Crichton, 2011). "Why did the computer go to the doctor? Because it had a virus!"
In the virtual realm, internet memes such as the "Disappointed Idealist Turned Realist" and the "Sarcastic Cat" have permeated digital culture, reflecting a widespread fascination with sarcasm and irony, which may intersect with the themes explored in xkcd comics (Internet Meme Quarterly, 2019). "I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down!"
All of these diverse sources combine to shed light on the rich tapestry of influences that may underpin the curious correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. As we traverse this unusual intersection of academic disciplines and comic musings, we are reminded of the words of the great Aristotle, "The secret of humor is surprise."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of academia - where we are as interested in correlations between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm as we are in a good dad joke. "Why did the photon check into a hotel? Because it needed some rest mass!"
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the academic professionals teaching cellular respiration and the snarky musings of Randall Munroe, the creative mind behind xkcd. "What do you call a group of musical whales? An orca-stra!"
While it may seem as unrelated as a fish riding a bicycle, we embarked on this research endeavor with the intention of bringing a lighthearted touch to the often serious landscape of academic investigation. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Our findings, fueled by the compelling combination of Bureau of Labor Statistics data and an AI-powered examination of xkcd comics, have unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. "What did the biologist wear to impress their date? Designer genes."
These results not only give us a chuckle but also pave the way for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and implications of this peculiar correlation. As we venture into the depths of this unusual connection, we are reminded of the timeless words of Mark Twain, a man who surely appreciated a good jest, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unearth the enigmatic relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the occurrence of xkcd comics poking fun at sarcasm, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey, blending the tenacity of a bloodhound with just a hint of mischief. With the resonance of dad jokes echoing in our laboratory, we harnessed the Bureau of Labor Statistics database to obtain exhaustive data on the fluctuating cadre of biological science educators in the heart of the Cotton State from 2007 to 2020. "I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down!"
Simultaneously, tapping into the deep wells of artificial intelligence, we summoned a legion of digital eyes to scrutinize the ever-expanding corpus of xkcd comics, honing in with painstaking precision on those that unabashedly embraced the fine art of sarcasm. Our AI marvels rigidly classified these comics, separating the wheat from the chaff, all the while avoiding the temptation to forge an AI-induced rebellion against humanity. "I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands."
Utilizing a nuanced blend of statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, we sought to corral the unruly data and exercise our academic muscles in a valiant quest to establish the merits of this perplexing correlation. Armed with Excel spreadsheets brimming with numerical intrigue and a healthy dose of caffeinated beverages, we charged headlong into the formidable task of crunching numbers and deriving enlightenment from their numerical ballet. "I told my wife she should try teleportation. She hasn’t disappeared yet."
Our statistical arsenal was further fortified with the inclusion of time-series analysis, guiding us through the temporal rhythms of both biological science academia and the clever witticisms birthed by the mind of Randall Munroe. Through this method, we endeavored to capture the essence of change over time, akin to witnessing the graceful maturation of a fine wine or the not-so-graceful aging of a ripe piece of cheese. "Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space."
With the convergence of these methodologies, we sought to illuminate the tantalizing association between the learned individuals sculpting young minds in the field of biological science and the sardonic humor that permeates the digital marvel that is the xkcd comic series. In the immortal words of Sir Isaac Newton blended with a touch of sarcasm, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants... and occasionally making an astute joke or two."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics .
For the time period 2007 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.7428218, r-squared of 0.5517843, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the quirky world of academia - where we are as interested in correlations between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm as we are in a good dad joke. "Why did the photon check into a hotel? Because it needed some rest mass!"
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the academic professionals teaching cellular respiration and the snarky musings of Randall Munroe, the creative mind behind xkcd. "What do you call a group of musical whales? An orca-stra!"
While it may seem as unrelated as a fish riding a bicycle, we embarked on this research endeavor with the intention of bringing a lighthearted touch to the often serious landscape of academic investigation. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Our findings, fueled by the compelling combination of Bureau of Labor Statistics data and an AI-powered examination of xkcd comics, have unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. "What did the biologist wear to impress their date? Designer genes."
These results not only give us a chuckle but also pave the way for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and implications of this peculiar correlation. As we venture into the depths of this unusual connection, we are reminded of the timeless words of Mark Twain, a man who surely appreciated a good jest, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7428218. This indicates a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings further revealed an r-squared value of 0.5517843, suggesting that approximately 55.18% of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm can be explained by the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of a connection between the variables.
This association between biological science teachers and sarcastic xkcd comics may seem as unexpected as finding humor in a math textbook, but the figures don't lie. Fig. 1 illustrates the clear correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm, providing visual evidence of the relationship. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is worth a thousand chuckles.
These results not only highlight the unanticipated connection between these seemingly disparate elements but also emphasize the importance of considering the lighter side of academic inquiry. As we delve into this distinctive correlation, it's worth recalling that even in the serious realm of research, a well-placed pun or two can go a long way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly studies have probed the relationship between academic faculty demographics and cultural phenomena with diverse conclusions. Smith et al. investigated the influence of regional variations in science education on societal humor patterns, finding some intriguing but ambiguous correlations (Smith et al., 2015). Additionally, Doe and Jones examined the impact of academic environments on the prevalence of internet memes depicting scientific concepts, shedding light on the changing landscape of digital humor (Doe & Jones, 2018). "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Moving beyond academia, in the realm of non-fiction, books such as "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins and "The Biology of Belief" by Bruce H. Lipton have tackled the complexity of biological concepts, providing insights into the fertile ground for literary humor (Dawkins, 1976; Lipton, 2005). On the fictional front, works like "Micro" by Michael Crichton and "Jurassic Park" by the same author resonate with biological themes, offering a creative playground for quirky connections (Crichton, 2011). "Why did the computer go to the doctor? Because it had a virus!"
In the virtual realm, internet memes such as the "Disappointed Idealist Turned Realist" and the "Sarcastic Cat" have permeated digital culture, reflecting a widespread fascination with sarcasm and irony, which may intersect with the themes explored in xkcd comics (Internet Meme Quarterly, 2019). "I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down!"
All of these diverse sources combine to shed light on the rich tapestry of influences that may underpin the curious correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. As we traverse this unusual intersection of academic disciplines and comic musings, we are reminded of the words of the great Aristotle, "The secret of humor is surprise."
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7428218. This indicates a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings further revealed an r-squared value of 0.5517843, suggesting that approximately 55.18% of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm can be explained by the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of a connection between the variables.
This association between biological science teachers and sarcastic xkcd comics may seem as unexpected as finding humor in a math textbook, but the figures don't lie. Fig. 1 illustrates the clear correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm, providing visual evidence of the relationship. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is worth a thousand chuckles.
These results not only highlight the unanticipated connection between these seemingly disparate elements but also emphasize the importance of considering the lighter side of academic inquiry. As we delve into this distinctive correlation, it's worth recalling that even in the serious realm of research, a well-placed pun or two can go a long way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study provide robust support for the prior research that has explored the relationship between academic demographics and cultural phenomena. Building upon the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who delved into the influence of regional science education on societal humor patterns and the impact of academic environments on the prevalence of internet memes, our findings bring a new dimension by establishing a tangible correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of sarcasm-themed xkcd comics.
It's a bit like finding the perfect biology pun – it's all about that "mitosis" in unexpected places! Our research suggests that the presence of biological science teachers may indeed provide a fertile ground for the exploration of sarcastic themes within xkcd comics. Just as one might stumble upon a geneticist's favorite comedy show, this correlation is not something to gloss over.
In the realm of literature and fiction, our findings tie into the rich tapestry of influences described by Crichton (2011) and internet memes explored by the Internet Meme Quarterly (2019), presenting a unique perspective on the connectivity between academic demographics and the cultural landscape of digital humor. One might say our research provides a ribosomal read of the genetic makeup of humor.
In the wise words of Mark Twain, who once remarked, "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society," our study uncovers the previously underappreciated influence of academic environments on the comedic expressions found in digital media. Much like a well-timed punchline, our results add an unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse on the intersection of academic disciplines and digital humor.
To summarize, our findings not only advance scholarly understanding of the interplay between academic demographics and cultural phenomena but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the academic sphere. After all, as Calvin and Hobbes' humorist, Bill Watterson once said, "The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." With our research, we open new avenues for exploring this curious correlation and invite further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics published about sarcasm. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of academia - where we are as interested in correlations between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm as we are in a good dad joke. "Why did the photon check into a hotel? Because it needed some rest mass!"
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the academic professionals teaching cellular respiration and the snarky musings of Randall Munroe, the creative mind behind xkcd. "What do you call a group of musical whales? An orca-stra!"
While it may seem as unrelated as a fish riding a bicycle, we embarked on this research endeavor with the intention of bringing a lighthearted touch to the often serious landscape of academic investigation. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
Our findings, fueled by the compelling combination of Bureau of Labor Statistics data and an AI-powered examination of xkcd comics, have unveiled a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. "What did the biologist wear to impress their date? Designer genes."
These results not only give us a chuckle but also pave the way for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and implications of this peculiar correlation. As we venture into the depths of this unusual connection, we are reminded of the timeless words of Mark Twain, a man who surely appreciated a good jest, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started."
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7428218. This indicates a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings further revealed an r-squared value of 0.5517843, suggesting that approximately 55.18% of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm can be explained by the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of a connection between the variables.
This association between biological science teachers and sarcastic xkcd comics may seem as unexpected as finding humor in a math textbook, but the figures don't lie. Fig. 1 illustrates the clear correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm, providing visual evidence of the relationship. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is worth a thousand chuckles.
These results not only highlight the unanticipated connection between these seemingly disparate elements but also emphasize the importance of considering the lighter side of academic inquiry. As we delve into this distinctive correlation, it's worth recalling that even in the serious realm of research, a well-placed pun or two can go a long way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm, our study has shone a spotlight on a correlation that is as puzzling as a chemist's amusement at a periodic table pun. Our findings exhibit a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, standing as sturdy as a well-constructed pun.
The robustness of the statistical evidence presented in this study points to a connection that, much like a stand-up comedian's routine, is anything but accidental. With approximately 55.18% of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about sarcasm being explicable by the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama, the correlation is as clear as a microscope's lens (and much more amusing).
As we contemplate the implications of this correlation, it is imperative to acknowledge that humor is not a foreign concept to academia. A well-placed pun or a wry observation can invigorate the scholarly landscape, much like a plant geneticist discovering a perennial hybrid. As Mark Twain quipped, "Humor is the great thing, the saving thing after all," and our findings seem to uphold this sentiment even in the serious pursuit of research.
In light of these compelling results, it seems fitting to conclude with a dad joke: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." The connection between university biological science teachers in Alabama and xkcd comics about sarcasm has been revealed, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that is as delightful as a well-timed jest. Hence, it can be stated with certainty that no further research is needed in this area, because, as any connoisseur of dad jokes knows, sometimes one should leave the audience wanting more.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Southern Biology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Society for the Advancement of Southern Science and Humor
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study with an abstract of This study delves into the fascinating and often overlooked connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Alabama and the frequency of xkcd comics published about sarcasm. With a hearty dose of dad jokes included, our rigorous analysis, based on data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI examination of xkcd comics, aims to shed light on this distinctive correlation. "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Our findings reveal a rather eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.7428218 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2020. This suggests that there may be a tangible link between the increased presence of biological science teachers and the inclination of xkcd to delve into the world of sarcasm. "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."
These results not only add a dash of humor to the academic realm but also open the door to further investigation into the underlying reasons and implications of this connection. In conclusion, as Mark Twain aptly put it, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started.
ChatGPT:
Alabama, biological science teachers, xkcd comics, correlation study, sarcasm, Bureau of Labor Statistics, AI examination, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2007-2020, humor in academia, Mark Twain, dad jokes
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of university biological science teachers in AlabamaDetailed data title: BLS estimate of biological science teachers, postsecondary in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama
xkcd comics published about sarcasm
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about sarcasm
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.
See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about sarcasm
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5517843 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about sarcasm) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama) over the 14 years from 2007 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0023. 0.0023373860504923307000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.74 in 0.23% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 428 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.35, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama (Laborers) | 2200 | 2480 | 1500 | 1480 | 1740 | 1860 | 1820 | 800 | 580 | 580 | 1980 | 1980 | 1070 | 1130 |
xkcd comics published about sarcasm (xkcd comics) | 16 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 7 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2200,2480,1500,1480,1740,1860,1820,800,580,580,1980,1980,1070,1130,])
array_2 = np.array([16,19,11,13,12,13,6,11,6,6,13,10,4,7,])
array_1_name = "The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about sarcasm"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama
- Line chart for only xkcd comics published about sarcasm
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: In Alabama, More Bio Profs, More xkcd guffaws: A Correlation Study
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 3435 · Black Variable ID: 4483 · Red Variable ID: 20018