Report an error
The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How nerdy PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
How insightful SciShow Space YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
Greece's annual import volume | r=0.76 | 18yrs | No |
The number of movies Zendaya appeared in | r=0.76 | 10yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.76 | 9yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about sarcasm | r=0.74 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Big Bird | r=0.72 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Reese | r=0.71 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Iraq | r=0.7 | 18yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Cognitive dissonance | r=0.68 | 18yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Greenland | r=0.66 | 18yrs | No |
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers | r=0.58 | 16yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for JP Morgan Chase | r=0.57 | 18yrs | No |
The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)