Download png, svg
AI explanation
The cleaner air in Omaha led residents to take up cycling, subsequently decreasing their demand for petroleum. This unexpected ripple effect was later coined as the "Finnish Line" of environmental impact.
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a city skyline featuring Omaha, Nebraska, with clear, crisp air and a visibly reduced smog layer. Additionally, depict a gas station scene in Finland with fewer cars waiting to refuel, highlighting a cleaner and less congested environment. Show the difference in air quality and transportation options between the two locations, emphasizing the positive impact of reduced pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Symbolism Psychedelic Cutsy graphics A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland, in the following situation: With cleaner air in Omaha, people felt less "exhaust"-ed, so they stopped "fuel"-ling up. Finnish drivers noticed the "elephant in the room" and followed suit, leading to a decrease in petroleum consumption.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Omaha, the skyline looked clearer than usual without the thick smog, and people were breathing easier. Meanwhile, in Finland, gas stations were noticeably less crowded as fewer cars lined up to refuel. The air in both places felt fresher, with less haze, and the roads seemed less congested as people embraced cleaner transportation options.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Omaha, the skyline looked clearer than usual without the thick smog, and people were breathing easier. Meanwhile, in Finland, gas stations were noticeably less crowded as fewer cars lined up to refuel. The air in both places felt fresher, with less haze, and the roads seemed less congested as people embraced cleaner transportation options. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a city skyline featuring Omaha, Nebraska, with clear, crisp air and a visibly reduced smog layer. Additionally, depict a gas station scene in Finland with fewer cars waiting to refuel, highlighting a cleaner and less congested environment. Show the difference in air quality and transportation options between the two locations, emphasizing the positive impact of reduced pollution.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Omaha caused Petroluem consumption in Finland to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
 |
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum The Journal of Ecological Geopolitics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwined tapestry of global environmental phenomena has long fascinated researchers and policymakers alike. From the smog-filled skies of urban metropolises to the unassuming gas pumps of distant nations, the air we breathe and the fuel we consume seem to share a silent, symbiotic relationship. Who would have thought that the windswept plains of Omaha could have any connection to the gasoline guzzling habits of Finland? Yet, here we are, peering into the unexpected nexus of air pollution and petroleum consumption with a mix of scientific curiosity and a pinch of whimsy.
As we embark on this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, one cannot help but ponder the curious dance of global interconnectedness. The old adage "what goes up must come down" takes on a whole new meaning when we consider the exhaust fumes of Omaha making their way across the vast expanse to influence the fuel choices of Finland. It's almost as if the molecules of pollution and petroleum are engaged in a clandestine tango, with each step leaving an indelible imprint on the other's destiny.
But before we delve too deep into this world of airborne intrigue and fossil fuel fascination, let us first lay down the groundwork by examining the individual realms of air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. Buckle up, dear reader, for this whimsical ride promises to be as enlightening as it is unexpectedly amusing.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwined tapestry of global environmental phenomena has long fascinated researchers and policymakers alike. From the smog-filled skies of urban metropolises to the unassuming gas pumps of distant nations, the air we breathe and the fuel we consume seem to share a silent, symbiotic relationship. Who would have thought that the windswept plains of Omaha could have any connection to the gasoline guzzling habits of Finland? Yet, here we are, peering into the unexpected nexus of air pollution and petroleum consumption with a mix of scientific curiosity and a pinch of whimsy.
As we embark on this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, one cannot help but ponder the curious dance of global interconnectedness. The old adage "what goes up must come down" takes on a whole new meaning when we consider the exhaust fumes of Omaha making their way across the vast expanse to influence the fuel choices of Finland. It's almost as if the molecules of pollution and petroleum are engaged in a clandestine tango, with each step leaving an indelible imprint on the other's destiny.
But before we delve too deep into this world of airborne intrigue and fossil fuel fascination, let us first lay down the groundwork by examining the individual realms of air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. Buckle up, dear reader, for this whimsical ride promises to be as enlightening as it is unexpectedly amusing.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the link between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland is a topic that has been underexplored in existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) delve into the nuances of transcontinental atmospheric circulation and its potential influence on global fuel preferences, laying the groundwork for our current investigation. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the socio-economic factors affecting air quality in Omaha and its potential repercussions on international energy dynamics. These studies provide a solid foundation for our exploration of the interconnected fate of pollution and petroleum, as we embark on a journey that is as enigmatic as it is oddly captivating.
In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Environmental Science Association, the authors explore the impact of localized air pollution on a global scale, hinting at the possibility of unseen connections between seemingly disparate locales. Moving from the realm of non-fiction to fictional narratives, "The Polluted Petroverse: A Tale of Ominous Emissions" by Fictional Environmentalist Society delves into an alternate universe where the whims of air pollution and petroleum consumption collide in unexpected and amusing ways.
The literature search also unveiled an intriguing but questionable source – the insightful musings scribbled on the back of grocery store receipts, collected from various chains in the vicinity of Omaha and Finland. While the authenticity and scholarly value of these sources may be suspect, the inadvertent wisdom hidden within the crumpled confines of these trivial artifacts cannot be entirely dismissed. After all, it is said that inspiration can be found in the unlikeliest of places, including the checkout line at the local convenience store.
With this amalgamation of both scholarly and... unconventional sources, we aim to illuminate the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena and incite a sense of both scientific wonder and lighthearted amusement in our readers. As we proceed, let us not forget to approach this investigation with a healthy dose of curiosity and an open mind, for who knows what whimsical connections may reveal themselves in the tangled web of air pollution and petroleum consumption.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwined tapestry of global environmental phenomena has long fascinated researchers and policymakers alike. From the smog-filled skies of urban metropolises to the unassuming gas pumps of distant nations, the air we breathe and the fuel we consume seem to share a silent, symbiotic relationship. Who would have thought that the windswept plains of Omaha could have any connection to the gasoline guzzling habits of Finland? Yet, here we are, peering into the unexpected nexus of air pollution and petroleum consumption with a mix of scientific curiosity and a pinch of whimsy.
As we embark on this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, one cannot help but ponder the curious dance of global interconnectedness. The old adage "what goes up must come down" takes on a whole new meaning when we consider the exhaust fumes of Omaha making their way across the vast expanse to influence the fuel choices of Finland. It's almost as if the molecules of pollution and petroleum are engaged in a clandestine tango, with each step leaving an indelible imprint on the other's destiny.
But before we delve too deep into this world of airborne intrigue and fossil fuel fascination, let us first lay down the groundwork by examining the individual realms of air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. Buckle up, dear reader, for this whimsical ride promises to be as enlightening as it is unexpectedly amusing.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the enigmatic connection between the air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, we embarked on a scientific quest that involved data collection, analysis, and a touch of whimsy. Our data pilgrimage began with a virtual odyssey across the digital landscapes of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, where we scoured the vast seas of information, navigating through waves of statistics and reports in search of the elusive bond between these two distant domains.
Armed with an array of caffeinated beverages and an impressive collection of questionable puns, our team waded through the murky depths of data from the years 1980 to 2022, casting a wide net to capture the ephemeral traces of air pollution and petroleum consumption. We employed an eclectic mix of statistical methods, including correlation analyses and time series modeling, to extract meaningful patterns from the swirling maelstrom of numbers and charts.
With a twinkle in our eyes and an undeniable sense of scientific adventure, we dare say that our methodology danced along the fine line between rigour and whimsy, much like a daring trapeze act in the circus of research. So stay tuned, dear reader, for the forthcoming revelations are likely to be as captivating as they are unexpectedly amusing.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6214309, r-squared of 0.3861763, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwined tapestry of global environmental phenomena has long fascinated researchers and policymakers alike. From the smog-filled skies of urban metropolises to the unassuming gas pumps of distant nations, the air we breathe and the fuel we consume seem to share a silent, symbiotic relationship. Who would have thought that the windswept plains of Omaha could have any connection to the gasoline guzzling habits of Finland? Yet, here we are, peering into the unexpected nexus of air pollution and petroleum consumption with a mix of scientific curiosity and a pinch of whimsy.
As we embark on this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, one cannot help but ponder the curious dance of global interconnectedness. The old adage "what goes up must come down" takes on a whole new meaning when we consider the exhaust fumes of Omaha making their way across the vast expanse to influence the fuel choices of Finland. It's almost as if the molecules of pollution and petroleum are engaged in a clandestine tango, with each step leaving an indelible imprint on the other's destiny.
But before we delve too deep into this world of airborne intrigue and fossil fuel fascination, let us first lay down the groundwork by examining the individual realms of air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. Buckle up, dear reader, for this whimsical ride promises to be as enlightening as it is unexpectedly amusing.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a surprising correlation between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the time period spanning 1980 to 2022 was calculated to be 0.6214309, with an r-squared value of 0.3861763, and p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables.
Our analysis showcases the unexpected kinship between these seemingly unconnected realms, emphasizing the elusive yet discernible link between the air we breathe in Nebraska and the fuel consumed in the distant lands of Finland. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution and petroleum consumption, visually capturing the clandestine tango of environmental fate across continents.
These findings not only provide insight into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena but also inspire a sense of wonder at the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption. Who would have thought that the dusty winds of Omaha and the fervent thirst for petroleum in Finland could be entwined in such a peculiar harmony? It seems that the invisible threads of environmental destiny weave a tale that transcends geography and beckons us to ponder the peculiarities of our planet's ecological symphony.
In conclusion, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms but also invites us to contemplate the lighthearted peculiarities of air pollution and petroleum consumption across the world stage. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, let us not forget to marvel at the whimsical dance of pollution and petrol, and perhaps ponder if a Finnish driver might one day yearn for a taste of Omaha's sizzling steak.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the link between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland is a topic that has been underexplored in existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) delve into the nuances of transcontinental atmospheric circulation and its potential influence on global fuel preferences, laying the groundwork for our current investigation. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the socio-economic factors affecting air quality in Omaha and its potential repercussions on international energy dynamics. These studies provide a solid foundation for our exploration of the interconnected fate of pollution and petroleum, as we embark on a journey that is as enigmatic as it is oddly captivating.
In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Environmental Science Association, the authors explore the impact of localized air pollution on a global scale, hinting at the possibility of unseen connections between seemingly disparate locales. Moving from the realm of non-fiction to fictional narratives, "The Polluted Petroverse: A Tale of Ominous Emissions" by Fictional Environmentalist Society delves into an alternate universe where the whims of air pollution and petroleum consumption collide in unexpected and amusing ways.
The literature search also unveiled an intriguing but questionable source – the insightful musings scribbled on the back of grocery store receipts, collected from various chains in the vicinity of Omaha and Finland. While the authenticity and scholarly value of these sources may be suspect, the inadvertent wisdom hidden within the crumpled confines of these trivial artifacts cannot be entirely dismissed. After all, it is said that inspiration can be found in the unlikeliest of places, including the checkout line at the local convenience store.
With this amalgamation of both scholarly and... unconventional sources, we aim to illuminate the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena and incite a sense of both scientific wonder and lighthearted amusement in our readers. As we proceed, let us not forget to approach this investigation with a healthy dose of curiosity and an open mind, for who knows what whimsical connections may reveal themselves in the tangled web of air pollution and petroleum consumption.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a surprising correlation between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the time period spanning 1980 to 2022 was calculated to be 0.6214309, with an r-squared value of 0.3861763, and p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables.
Our analysis showcases the unexpected kinship between these seemingly unconnected realms, emphasizing the elusive yet discernible link between the air we breathe in Nebraska and the fuel consumed in the distant lands of Finland. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution and petroleum consumption, visually capturing the clandestine tango of environmental fate across continents.
These findings not only provide insight into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena but also inspire a sense of wonder at the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption. Who would have thought that the dusty winds of Omaha and the fervent thirst for petroleum in Finland could be entwined in such a peculiar harmony? It seems that the invisible threads of environmental destiny weave a tale that transcends geography and beckons us to ponder the peculiarities of our planet's ecological symphony.
In conclusion, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms but also invites us to contemplate the lighthearted peculiarities of air pollution and petroleum consumption across the world stage. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, let us not forget to marvel at the whimsical dance of pollution and petrol, and perhaps ponder if a Finnish driver might one day yearn for a taste of Omaha's sizzling steak.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings notably support the prior research that hinted at the enigmatic interplay of far-reaching air pollution and petroleum consumption. The correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 underscored the substantial link between these seemingly incongruous phenomena, setting the stage for a delightful exploration of the hidden ties that bind them.
The literature review, with all its scholarly gravitas and a hint of playful absurdity, paved the way for our investigation by highlighting the overlooked possibility of clandestine connections between Omaha's polluted skies and Finland's petroleum cravings. The musings scribbled on grocery store receipts, while whimsical in their own right, inadvertently prodded us to ponder the unassuming sources of inspiration and insight. Who could have imagined that a crumpled receipt from the local convenience store could trigger thoughts about the intricate dance of global environmental forces?
As our results affirm the substantial correlation between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, the whimsical tale of pollution and petrol unfolds with a touch of scientific wonder and lighthearted amusement. Our jocular nod to the possibility of a Finnish driver craving a sizzling steak from Omaha, while seemingly farcical, aligns with our broader endeavor to consider the unexpected complexities of environmental interconnectedness and the peculiarities of global fate.
In the broader context of environmental challenges, our study reminds us to approach our investigations with a balanced mix of curiosity and humor, for there may well be surprising connections hidden within the tangled web of seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we move forward, let us not lose sight of the whimsical threads that weave the ecological symphony of our planet, inviting us to appreciate the playful dance of pollution and petrol across the world stage.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Omaha and Petroluem consumption in Finland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwined tapestry of global environmental phenomena has long fascinated researchers and policymakers alike. From the smog-filled skies of urban metropolises to the unassuming gas pumps of distant nations, the air we breathe and the fuel we consume seem to share a silent, symbiotic relationship. Who would have thought that the windswept plains of Omaha could have any connection to the gasoline guzzling habits of Finland? Yet, here we are, peering into the unexpected nexus of air pollution and petroleum consumption with a mix of scientific curiosity and a pinch of whimsy.
As we embark on this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, one cannot help but ponder the curious dance of global interconnectedness. The old adage "what goes up must come down" takes on a whole new meaning when we consider the exhaust fumes of Omaha making their way across the vast expanse to influence the fuel choices of Finland. It's almost as if the molecules of pollution and petroleum are engaged in a clandestine tango, with each step leaving an indelible imprint on the other's destiny.
But before we delve too deep into this world of airborne intrigue and fossil fuel fascination, let us first lay down the groundwork by examining the individual realms of air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. Buckle up, dear reader, for this whimsical ride promises to be as enlightening as it is unexpectedly amusing.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a surprising correlation between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the time period spanning 1980 to 2022 was calculated to be 0.6214309, with an r-squared value of 0.3861763, and p < 0.01, indicating a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables.
Our analysis showcases the unexpected kinship between these seemingly unconnected realms, emphasizing the elusive yet discernible link between the air we breathe in Nebraska and the fuel consumed in the distant lands of Finland. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot further illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution and petroleum consumption, visually capturing the clandestine tango of environmental fate across continents.
These findings not only provide insight into the interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena but also inspire a sense of wonder at the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption. Who would have thought that the dusty winds of Omaha and the fervent thirst for petroleum in Finland could be entwined in such a peculiar harmony? It seems that the invisible threads of environmental destiny weave a tale that transcends geography and beckons us to ponder the peculiarities of our planet's ecological symphony.
In conclusion, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms but also invites us to contemplate the lighthearted peculiarities of air pollution and petroleum consumption across the world stage. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, let us not forget to marvel at the whimsical dance of pollution and petrol, and perhaps ponder if a Finnish driver might one day yearn for a taste of Omaha's sizzling steak.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has shed light on the unforeseen kinship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01. The clandestine tango of environmental fate across continents, as captured in our scatterplot, is indeed a whimsical dance that transcends mere statistical significance. The interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate realms beckons us to ponder the lighthearted peculiarities of environmental destiny, all while contemplating if a Finnish driver might one day yearn for a taste of Omaha's sizzling steak.
As we bid adieu to this curious journey from Omaha's air to Finland's fuel, we are left with a sense of wonder at the unexpected interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena. It seems that the whimsical dance of pollution and petrol has unfolded before our eyes, reminding us of the quirky intricacies that permeate our planet's ecological symphony. It is in these peculiarities that the essence of environmental research lies, like finding a hidden joke in an academic paper – a delightful surprise that renders further investigation unnecessary.
Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Ecological Geopolitics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Global Environmental Restoration Institute
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum with an abstract of This study presents a synergistic exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Omaha and petroleum consumption in Finland, shedding light on the intertwined destiny of seemingly disparate locales. By synthesizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.6214309 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2022 revealed an unexpected kinship between these two distant realms. Our findings showcase the unanticipated interconnectedness of global environmental phenomena, reminding us that the fate of the air we breathe and the fuel we consume is more intertwined than meets the eye. As we navigate the complexities of modern environmental challenges, perhaps we should also ponder the whimsical dance of air pollution and petroleum consumption across continents, all while pondering if a Finnish driver might crave a sizzling steak from Omaha.
ChatGPT:
air pollution, petroleum consumption, Omaha, Finland, global environmental phenomena, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, interconnectedness, modern environmental challenges
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in OmahaDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Omaha
Petroluem consumption in Finland
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Finland in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Finland
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.3861763 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Finland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Omaha) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.701E-6. 0.0000087008672735868610000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.0008701% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 114,931 random variables You don't actually need 114 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.39, 0.78 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| Air pollution in Omaha (Bad air quality days) | 21.3115 | 0.821918 | 4.38356 | 1.64384 | 3.55191 | 6.0274 | 1.36986 | 3.0137 | 10.929 | 2.73973 | 2.19178 | 1.09589 | 0.819672 | 0.273973 | 0.821918 | 2.19178 | 0.273224 | 1.09589 | 3.28767 | 3.56164 | 4.64481 | 2.73973 | 4.10959 | 3.83562 | 2.73224 | 5.75342 | 4.65753 | 3.83562 | 3.00546 | 0.547945 | 3.0137 | 1.36986 | 5.46448 | 1.09589 | 0.547945 | 0.821918 | 0.546448 | 0 | 1.36986 | 0 | 0.546448 | 1.36986 | 0.273973 |
| Petroluem consumption in Finland (Million Barrels/Day) | 270.5 | 241 | 221 | 208 | 214.213 | 205.304 | 223.036 | 231.205 | 230.395 | 227.674 | 228.37 | 228.271 | 227.893 | 213.934 | 222.951 | 206.159 | 206.486 | 206.723 | 214.041 | 214.063 | 212.683 | 214.123 | 220.422 | 224.995 | 221.38 | 220.844 | 223.427 | 226.737 | 216.858 | 203.315 | 212.622 | 206.973 | 197.667 | 208.841 | 205.378 | 205.167 | 208.396 | 208.151 | 208.49 | 209.447 | 188.552 | 183.929 | 190.041 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21.3115,0.821918,4.38356,1.64384,3.55191,6.0274,1.36986,3.0137,10.929,2.73973,2.19178,1.09589,0.819672,0.273973,0.821918,2.19178,0.273224,1.09589,3.28767,3.56164,4.64481,2.73973,4.10959,3.83562,2.73224,5.75342,4.65753,3.83562,3.00546,0.547945,3.0137,1.36986,5.46448,1.09589,0.547945,0.821918,0.546448,0,1.36986,0,0.546448,1.36986,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([270.5,241,221,208,214.213,205.304,223.036,231.205,230.395,227.674,228.37,228.271,227.893,213.934,222.951,206.159,206.486,206.723,214.041,214.063,212.683,214.123,220.422,224.995,221.38,220.844,223.427,226.737,216.858,203.315,212.622,206.973,197.667,208.841,205.378,205.167,208.396,208.151,208.49,209.447,188.552,183.929,190.041,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Omaha"
array_2_name = "Petroluem consumption in Finland"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Omaha
- Line chart for only Petroluem consumption in Finland
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: From Omaha's Air to Finland's Fuel: Uncovering the Linked Fates of Pollution and Petroleum
Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!
Correlation ID: 3398 · Black Variable ID: 21006 · Red Variable ID: 24415
