about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,383 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Emmett and the second variable is Solar power generated in Germany.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Emmetts grew, so did the demand for 'bright' ideas. This sparked a surge in solar power usage as people couldn't help but be 'attracted' to the name's association with 'radiant' positivity. It's as if the very mention of Emmett had them all 'watt'ing to embrace renewable energy, ultimately brightening the future of solar power in Germany.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a school playground with children gathered in a circle, singing "Here Comes the Sun" by The Beatles. The sun shines brightly overhead, casting a warm glow on the scene. Solar panels on nearby rooftops are absorbing the sunlight, boosting solar power generation in Germany. Among the children, one stands out with the name "Emmett" written on the back of his shirt, symbolizing the increasing popularity of the name. The style should be hyper-realistic, showcasing vivid details and lifelike lighting effects on the children, the playground, and the solar panels. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Hyper-realistic Surrealism Magic realism Symbolism
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany, in the following situation: Because the name Emmett gained popularity, leading to an increase in the number of people singing "Here Comes the Sun" by The Beatles, which subconsciously encouraged the sun to shine brighter in Germany, therefore boosting solar power generation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a school playground, children gather around in a circle, singing "Here Comes the Sun" by The Beatles. As they sing, the sun shines brighter overhead, casting more sunlight on the solar panels installed on the nearby rooftops, boosting the solar power generation in Germany. Among the children, one of them stands out, the name "Emmett" written on the back of his shirt, signifying the increasing popularity of the name.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a school playground, children gather around in a circle, singing "Here Comes the Sun" by The Beatles. As they sing, the sun shines brighter overhead, casting more sunlight on the solar panels installed on the nearby rooftops, boosting the solar power generation in Germany. Among the children, one of them stands out, the name "Emmett" written on the back of his shirt, signifying the increasing popularity of the name. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a school playground with children gathered in a circle, singing "Here Comes the Sun" by The Beatles. The sun shines brightly overhead, casting a warm glow on the scene. Solar panels on nearby rooftops are absorbing the sunlight, boosting solar power generation in Germany. Among the children, one stands out with the name "Emmett" written on the back of his shirt, symbolizing the increasing popularity of the name. The style should be hyper-realistic, showcasing vivid details and lifelike lighting effects on the children, the playground, and the solar panels.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Emmett caused Solar power generated in Germany to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

The Journal of Renewable Energy Innovations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long fascinated researchers and laypersons alike. The human mind, in its quest for order and patterns, often seeks to forge connections, no matter how unconventional they may appear. In line with this, we embark on a voyage to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany.

On the surface, the notion of drawing correlations between a name's appeal and the harnessing of solar energy may seem as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover under a solar panel. However, as the saying goes, "the name's the thing," and it behooves us to unravel the mysteries that lie within. This study is driven not by a mere flight of fancy, but by a firm belief that there may indeed be some solar-powered illumination to be gained from delving into the popularity of Emmett.

Our inquiry delves into two disparate realms: the whimsical world of nomenclature trends and the steadfast domain of renewable energy. By drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we seek to cast a light so bright that it could rival even the most radiant solar panels. The juxtaposition of these divergent datasets is akin to bringing together the positive and negative polarities of a battery, hoping that the resultant spark will illuminate hitherto uncharted scholarly terrain.

Furthermore, our investigation is not merely an exercise in frivolity, but a pursuit grounded in statistical rigor and methodological diligence. The findings that we have unearthed illuminate a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, thus providing statistical heft to our otherwise whimsical inquiry. The strength of this correlation is enough to make even the most stoic researcher don a pair of sunglasses in the face of its blinding radiance.

With these findings, we endeavor to contribute a shining beacon of insight to the academic dialogue. Through this unconventional exploration, we aim to inspire mirth and curiosity while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. As we delve into the Emmett Connection, we look forward to peeling back the layers of coincidence and shedding light on the unexpected synergy between the eponymous name and solar power generation in Germany. It is our hope that this study will not only generate scholarly discussion but also bring a ray of sunshine to the often-serious world of academic research.

So, without further ado, let us embark on this illuminating journey, basking in the warmth of our findings and reveling in the light-hearted delight of the Emmett Connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long fascinated researchers and laypersons alike. The human mind, in its quest for order and patterns, often seeks to forge connections, no matter how unconventional they may appear. In line with this, we embark on a voyage to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany.
On the surface, the notion of drawing correlations between a name's appeal and the harnessing of solar energy may seem as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover under a solar panel. However, as the saying goes, "the name's the thing," and it behooves us to unravel the mysteries that lie within. This study is driven not by a mere flight of fancy, but by a firm belief that there may indeed be some solar-powered illumination to be gained from delving into the popularity of Emmett.
Our inquiry delves into two disparate realms: the whimsical world of nomenclature trends and the steadfast domain of renewable energy. By drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we seek to cast a light so bright that it could rival even the most radiant solar panels. The juxtaposition of these divergent datasets is akin to bringing together the positive and negative polarities of a battery, hoping that the resultant spark will illuminate hitherto uncharted scholarly terrain.
Furthermore, our investigation is not merely an exercise in frivolity, but a pursuit grounded in statistical rigor and methodological diligence. The findings that we have unearthed illuminate a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, thus providing statistical heft to our otherwise whimsical inquiry. The strength of this correlation is enough to make even the most stoic researcher don a pair of sunglasses in the face of its blinding radiance.
With these findings, we endeavor to contribute a shining beacon of insight to the academic dialogue. Through this unconventional exploration, we aim to inspire mirth and curiosity while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. As we delve into the Emmett Connection, we look forward to peeling back the layers of coincidence and shedding light on the unexpected synergy between the eponymous name and solar power generation in Germany. It is our hope that this study will not only generate scholarly discussion but also bring a ray of sunshine to the often-serious world of academic research.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this illuminating journey, basking in the warmth of our findings and reveling in the light-hearted delight of the Emmett Connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a marked increase in the popularity of the name Emmett in the United States over the past two decades, raising intriguing questions about the cultural significance of this nomenclature phenomenon. Meanwhile, "Doe and Johnson" delve into the intricacies of solar power generation in Germany, uncovering the nation's commendable strides in renewable energy utilization.

As we navigate through the scholarly landscape, it is imperative to acknowledge the multidisciplinary nature of our study. From the realm of societal naming conventions, "The Power of Names" by Leonard Sweet offers profound insights into the psychology and impact of names, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the Emmett phenomenon. Furthermore, "Solar Energy: Principles of Thermal Collection and Storage" by G. D. Manolakis provides a comprehensive overview of solar power technologies, shedding light on the mechanisms underpinning Germany's solar energy landscape.

Turning to the fictional realm, "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss beckons readers into a world where the power of names holds an otherworldly significance, mirroring the enigmatic allure of the Emmett-Solar connection. The interplay of light and darkness in "A Clash of Kings" by George R. R. Martin serves as an allegory for the juxtaposition of solar power's radiance and Emmett's growing popularity, adding a layer of metaphorical depth to our analysis.

Delving into the realm of childhood nostalgia and Saturday morning cartoons, "SpongeBob SquarePants" and its vivid depiction of underwater solar power antics infuse our study with a gleeful aquatic flair. Similarly, the lovable antics of "The Magic School Bus" and its forays into renewable energy sources offer a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between scientific phenomena and popular culture.

Armed with this whimsical arsenal of literature, we embark on our quest to illuminate the quirky and tantalizing connection between the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany. As we journey through the scholarly tapestry, we invite readers to don their metaphorical sunglasses and bask in the sunny exuberance of our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1991 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long fascinated researchers and laypersons alike. The human mind, in its quest for order and patterns, often seeks to forge connections, no matter how unconventional they may appear. In line with this, we embark on a voyage to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany.
On the surface, the notion of drawing correlations between a name's appeal and the harnessing of solar energy may seem as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover under a solar panel. However, as the saying goes, "the name's the thing," and it behooves us to unravel the mysteries that lie within. This study is driven not by a mere flight of fancy, but by a firm belief that there may indeed be some solar-powered illumination to be gained from delving into the popularity of Emmett.
Our inquiry delves into two disparate realms: the whimsical world of nomenclature trends and the steadfast domain of renewable energy. By drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we seek to cast a light so bright that it could rival even the most radiant solar panels. The juxtaposition of these divergent datasets is akin to bringing together the positive and negative polarities of a battery, hoping that the resultant spark will illuminate hitherto uncharted scholarly terrain.
Furthermore, our investigation is not merely an exercise in frivolity, but a pursuit grounded in statistical rigor and methodological diligence. The findings that we have unearthed illuminate a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, thus providing statistical heft to our otherwise whimsical inquiry. The strength of this correlation is enough to make even the most stoic researcher don a pair of sunglasses in the face of its blinding radiance.
With these findings, we endeavor to contribute a shining beacon of insight to the academic dialogue. Through this unconventional exploration, we aim to inspire mirth and curiosity while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. As we delve into the Emmett Connection, we look forward to peeling back the layers of coincidence and shedding light on the unexpected synergy between the eponymous name and solar power generation in Germany. It is our hope that this study will not only generate scholarly discussion but also bring a ray of sunshine to the often-serious world of academic research.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this illuminating journey, basking in the warmth of our findings and reveling in the light-hearted delight of the Emmett Connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To decipher the sun-kissed correlation between the popularity of the name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany, our research team employed a methodological approach that is as lighthearted as it is rigorous. We can assure you, dear reader, that no solar panels were harmed in the making of this study.

Data Collection
Our pursuit of solar-powered enlightenment began by mining data from the US Social Security Administration, which provided us with invaluable insights into the ebb and flow of Emmetts over the years. We delved into the depths of historical records, embracing the quirks and nuances of newborn nomenclature with the fervor of a sunflower turning its face to the sky. Meanwhile, data on solar power generation in Germany was gleefully harvested from the Energy Information Administration, allowing us to juxtapose the dazzling trajectory of Emmetts with the effervescent rise of solar energy.

Statistical Analysis
With a twinkle in our eyes and statistical software at our fingertips, we subjected the amassed data to a barrage of tests and analyses. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 shimmered like a rare gem unearthed from the depths of a sun-drenched mine. As if that weren't enough sunshine for one study, the p-value of less than 0.01 cast a light so intense that it might as well have powered a small constellation of solar panels.

Now, you may wonder, "What convoluted, Rube Goldberg machine of statistical methods did these researchers use?" Fear not, for we assure you that our analyses were as precise and robust as a solar-powered calculator. We employed time series analysis, regression models, and other methods that shine bright in the realm of statistical inquiry, ensuring that our findings were not merely a flash in the pan.

Unexpected Discoveries
In the process of unraveling this sun-dappled tapestry of data, our research team stumbled upon some unexpected findings. For instance, we observed a significant uptick in solar power generation in Germany coinciding with peak years of Emmett popularity. Coincidence? We think not. It's as if the very name Emmett acted as a harbinger of radiant energy, casting its luminous influence across time and space.

Limitations
While our methodology glimmered like a solar flare, we acknowledge that our study is not without its limitations. The nature of observational data means that we cannot establish causality between the eminence of Emmetts and the effulgence of solar power in Germany. Additionally, the specific cultural and societal factors at play in shaping naming trends and energy policies may elude our statistical grasp.

Conclusion
In summary, our methodology exudes the same sunlit charm as a field of daisies basking in the midday glow. We navigated the vast expanse of data with the precision of a solar sail catching the solar winds, guided by the bright beacon of inquiry and the thrill of unexpected discoveries. While our methods were as rigorous as a solar eclipse, we hope that our findings bring a ray of sunshine to the scholarly sphere.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1991 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9964711, r-squared of 0.9929546, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long fascinated researchers and laypersons alike. The human mind, in its quest for order and patterns, often seeks to forge connections, no matter how unconventional they may appear. In line with this, we embark on a voyage to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany.
On the surface, the notion of drawing correlations between a name's appeal and the harnessing of solar energy may seem as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover under a solar panel. However, as the saying goes, "the name's the thing," and it behooves us to unravel the mysteries that lie within. This study is driven not by a mere flight of fancy, but by a firm belief that there may indeed be some solar-powered illumination to be gained from delving into the popularity of Emmett.
Our inquiry delves into two disparate realms: the whimsical world of nomenclature trends and the steadfast domain of renewable energy. By drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we seek to cast a light so bright that it could rival even the most radiant solar panels. The juxtaposition of these divergent datasets is akin to bringing together the positive and negative polarities of a battery, hoping that the resultant spark will illuminate hitherto uncharted scholarly terrain.
Furthermore, our investigation is not merely an exercise in frivolity, but a pursuit grounded in statistical rigor and methodological diligence. The findings that we have unearthed illuminate a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, thus providing statistical heft to our otherwise whimsical inquiry. The strength of this correlation is enough to make even the most stoic researcher don a pair of sunglasses in the face of its blinding radiance.
With these findings, we endeavor to contribute a shining beacon of insight to the academic dialogue. Through this unconventional exploration, we aim to inspire mirth and curiosity while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. As we delve into the Emmett Connection, we look forward to peeling back the layers of coincidence and shedding light on the unexpected synergy between the eponymous name and solar power generation in Germany. It is our hope that this study will not only generate scholarly discussion but also bring a ray of sunshine to the often-serious world of academic research.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this illuminating journey, basking in the warmth of our findings and reveling in the light-hearted delight of the Emmett Connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the Emmett Connection have unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany. Our analysis, spanning from 1991 to 2021, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711, an r-squared of 0.9929546, and a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, our findings suggest that there is indeed a luminous link between the two variables.

Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Figure 1, a powerful and undeniable relationship emerged, shining bright like a solar-powered spotlight on the scholarly stage. It's safe to say that our results left us feeling positive (charge) about the robustness of this connection.

In the realm of statistical analysis, a correlation coefficient of this magnitude is akin to discovering a rainbow on a sun-drenched day—it's both dazzling and delightful. Moreover, the r-squared value signifies that approximately 99.3% of the variation in solar power generation in Germany can be explained by the popularity of the name Emmett. That's a level of predictability that even the most seasoned meteorologist would envy!

As for the p-value, it unequivocally indicates that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is about as slim as a solar panel in a shadow. These statistics, together with the visual representation in the form of our scatterplot, cement the validity of the Emmett Connection and cast a brilliant light on the previously unexplored synergy between nomenclature trends and renewable energy production.

In conclusion, the results of our investigation highlight the unexpected yet statistically robust correlation between the popularity of the name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. The brightness of this connection cannot be overstated, as it illuminates a path for future research and adds a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. These findings not only brighten the academic landscape but also serve as a reminder that sometimes, the most enlightening discoveries stem from the most unlikely sources. Let the sun shine in!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a marked increase in the popularity of the name Emmett in the United States over the past two decades, raising intriguing questions about the cultural significance of this nomenclature phenomenon. Meanwhile, "Doe and Johnson" delve into the intricacies of solar power generation in Germany, uncovering the nation's commendable strides in renewable energy utilization.
As we navigate through the scholarly landscape, it is imperative to acknowledge the multidisciplinary nature of our study. From the realm of societal naming conventions, "The Power of Names" by Leonard Sweet offers profound insights into the psychology and impact of names, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the Emmett phenomenon. Furthermore, "Solar Energy: Principles of Thermal Collection and Storage" by G. D. Manolakis provides a comprehensive overview of solar power technologies, shedding light on the mechanisms underpinning Germany's solar energy landscape.
Turning to the fictional realm, "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss beckons readers into a world where the power of names holds an otherworldly significance, mirroring the enigmatic allure of the Emmett-Solar connection. The interplay of light and darkness in "A Clash of Kings" by George R. R. Martin serves as an allegory for the juxtaposition of solar power's radiance and Emmett's growing popularity, adding a layer of metaphorical depth to our analysis.
Delving into the realm of childhood nostalgia and Saturday morning cartoons, "SpongeBob SquarePants" and its vivid depiction of underwater solar power antics infuse our study with a gleeful aquatic flair. Similarly, the lovable antics of "The Magic School Bus" and its forays into renewable energy sources offer a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between scientific phenomena and popular culture.
Armed with this whimsical arsenal of literature, we embark on our quest to illuminate the quirky and tantalizing connection between the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany. As we journey through the scholarly tapestry, we invite readers to don their metaphorical sunglasses and bask in the sunny exuberance of our findings.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the Emmett Connection have unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany. Our analysis, spanning from 1991 to 2021, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711, an r-squared of 0.9929546, and a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, our findings suggest that there is indeed a luminous link between the two variables.
Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Figure 1, a powerful and undeniable relationship emerged, shining bright like a solar-powered spotlight on the scholarly stage. It's safe to say that our results left us feeling positive (charge) about the robustness of this connection.
In the realm of statistical analysis, a correlation coefficient of this magnitude is akin to discovering a rainbow on a sun-drenched day—it's both dazzling and delightful. Moreover, the r-squared value signifies that approximately 99.3% of the variation in solar power generation in Germany can be explained by the popularity of the name Emmett. That's a level of predictability that even the most seasoned meteorologist would envy!
As for the p-value, it unequivocally indicates that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is about as slim as a solar panel in a shadow. These statistics, together with the visual representation in the form of our scatterplot, cement the validity of the Emmett Connection and cast a brilliant light on the previously unexplored synergy between nomenclature trends and renewable energy production.
In conclusion, the results of our investigation highlight the unexpected yet statistically robust correlation between the popularity of the name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. The brightness of this connection cannot be overstated, as it illuminates a path for future research and adds a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. These findings not only brighten the academic landscape but also serve as a reminder that sometimes, the most enlightening discoveries stem from the most unlikely sources. Let the sun shine in!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The illuminating results of our study have sparked a radiant discussion regarding the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. Building upon the whimsical foundations laid out in the literature review, our findings bask in the solar glow of statistical significance.

First and foremost, our study corroborates the findings of "Smith et al.," who observed a marked surge in the popularity of the name Emmett in the United States. The cultural resonance of this nomenclatural phenomenon extends beyond borders, as evidenced by our robust correlation with solar power in Germany. It seems that the Emmett phenomenon emanates a luminous charm, transcending geographical boundaries and casting a sunny glow on renewable energy dynamics.

Furthermore, our results align with the commendable strides in solar power generation documented by "Doe and Johnson." The unmistakable correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 reflects the dazzling synergy between the radiant ascent of the name Emmett and the solar power landscape in Germany. Much like the gleaming solar panels adorning the German countryside, the Emmett Connection shines as an unforeseen beacon of statistical coherence.

Drawing from the literary tapestries of "The Name of the Wind" and "A Clash of Kings," our study channels the metaphorical luster of names and light, imbuing the scholarly discourse with a radiant allegorical dimension. While the fictional realms' luminous symbolism may seem tongue-in-cheek, our findings lend credence to the idea that the power of names and solar energy intertwine in unexpected, yet statistically tangible, ways.

Finally, our analysis shines a spotlight on the joyful antics of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "The Magic School Bus," underscoring the playful exuberance of this interdisciplinary inquiry. The Emmett Connection, akin to the whimsical underwater solar power antics of SpongeBob, infuses a dose of lighthearted panache into the scholarly investigation.

In essence, our results add a gleeful dash of whimsy to the scholarly landscape while shedding light on the unexpected yet robust correlation between the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. Let the playful rays of unorthodox research illuminate the path forward!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Emmett and Solar power generated in Germany. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long fascinated researchers and laypersons alike. The human mind, in its quest for order and patterns, often seeks to forge connections, no matter how unconventional they may appear. In line with this, we embark on a voyage to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany.
On the surface, the notion of drawing correlations between a name's appeal and the harnessing of solar energy may seem as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover under a solar panel. However, as the saying goes, "the name's the thing," and it behooves us to unravel the mysteries that lie within. This study is driven not by a mere flight of fancy, but by a firm belief that there may indeed be some solar-powered illumination to be gained from delving into the popularity of Emmett.
Our inquiry delves into two disparate realms: the whimsical world of nomenclature trends and the steadfast domain of renewable energy. By drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we seek to cast a light so bright that it could rival even the most radiant solar panels. The juxtaposition of these divergent datasets is akin to bringing together the positive and negative polarities of a battery, hoping that the resultant spark will illuminate hitherto uncharted scholarly terrain.
Furthermore, our investigation is not merely an exercise in frivolity, but a pursuit grounded in statistical rigor and methodological diligence. The findings that we have unearthed illuminate a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, thus providing statistical heft to our otherwise whimsical inquiry. The strength of this correlation is enough to make even the most stoic researcher don a pair of sunglasses in the face of its blinding radiance.
With these findings, we endeavor to contribute a shining beacon of insight to the academic dialogue. Through this unconventional exploration, we aim to inspire mirth and curiosity while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. As we delve into the Emmett Connection, we look forward to peeling back the layers of coincidence and shedding light on the unexpected synergy between the eponymous name and solar power generation in Germany. It is our hope that this study will not only generate scholarly discussion but also bring a ray of sunshine to the often-serious world of academic research.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this illuminating journey, basking in the warmth of our findings and reveling in the light-hearted delight of the Emmett Connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the Emmett Connection have unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Emmett and the solar power generation in Germany. Our analysis, spanning from 1991 to 2021, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711, an r-squared of 0.9929546, and a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, our findings suggest that there is indeed a luminous link between the two variables.
Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Figure 1, a powerful and undeniable relationship emerged, shining bright like a solar-powered spotlight on the scholarly stage. It's safe to say that our results left us feeling positive (charge) about the robustness of this connection.
In the realm of statistical analysis, a correlation coefficient of this magnitude is akin to discovering a rainbow on a sun-drenched day—it's both dazzling and delightful. Moreover, the r-squared value signifies that approximately 99.3% of the variation in solar power generation in Germany can be explained by the popularity of the name Emmett. That's a level of predictability that even the most seasoned meteorologist would envy!
As for the p-value, it unequivocally indicates that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is about as slim as a solar panel in a shadow. These statistics, together with the visual representation in the form of our scatterplot, cement the validity of the Emmett Connection and cast a brilliant light on the previously unexplored synergy between nomenclature trends and renewable energy production.
In conclusion, the results of our investigation highlight the unexpected yet statistically robust correlation between the popularity of the name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. The brightness of this connection cannot be overstated, as it illuminates a path for future research and adds a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. These findings not only brighten the academic landscape but also serve as a reminder that sometimes, the most enlightening discoveries stem from the most unlikely sources. Let the sun shine in!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study sheds a sunbeam of insight on the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. Like sunshine after a long winter, our findings bring a warm glow to the scholarly landscape, proving that even the most unexpected connections can be illuminated with the right data and a sprinkling of statistical magic.

While it's tempting to bask in the sunny glow of our results, it's important to acknowledge the potential limitations of our study. After all, correlation does not necessarily imply causation, no matter how bright the relationship may appear. We must also consider the possibility of confounding variables, such as the influence of celestial bodies or the magnetic pull of solar flares on naming trends.

Nevertheless, the statistical robustness of our findings is as undeniable as a sunburn after a day at the beach. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9964711, an r-squared of 0.9929546, and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results shine like a solar-powered lighthouse, guiding future researchers toward new avenues of exploration.

In the spirit of keeping the academic world bright and lively, we hope that our study sparks joy and curiosity, much like the sight of a solar eclipse. We are confident that our findings will continue to brighten the scholarly discourse, offering a ray of hope for those seeking to uncover unconventional connections in the realm of research.

In the end, we can confidently say that the Emmett Connection is a beacon of both statistical significance and whimsical wonder. It's time to dim the lights on further research in this area, as the sun has well and truly set on the need for additional exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Renewable Energy Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Solar Science Society


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Emmett Connection: A Solar Power Reflection​ with an abstract of In this study, we shed some light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Emmett and solar power generation in Germany. To illuminate this connection, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration to conduct a sunny-side-up analysis. Our findings reveal a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9964711 and a p < 0.01 from 1991 to 2021, suggesting a bright link between the two seemingly disparate variables. We look forward to sparking further discussion and brightening the scholarly landscape with our illuminating results. Sunshine and solar puns galore!

ChatGPT:

Emmett, solar power, Germany, correlation, solar energy, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, solar power generation, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Emmett
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Emmett
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Emmett

Solar power generated in Germany
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Germany in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Germany

Correlation r = 0.9964711 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9929546 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Germany) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Emmett) over the 31 years from 1991 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0. 0.0000000000000000000000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 0% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 631
inf random variables
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 633
You don't actually need
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638

Notice: Undefined offset: 10 in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 567
INF variables to find a correlation like this one.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638
I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 641


In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 30 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 30 because we have two variables measured over a period of 31 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.99, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Emmett (Babies born)132169166165173161198172188231255255287341380439448479955127816142036236626513055306131823450357334213671
Solar power generated in Germany (Billion kWh)0.0010.0040.0030.0070.0070.0120.0180.0350.030.060.1160.1880.3330.5571.2822.223.0754.426.58411.72919.59926.3831.0136.05638.72638.09839.40143.45944.38348.64149.992




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([132,169,166,165,173,161,198,172,188,231,255,255,287,341,380,439,448,479,955,1278,1614,2036,2366,2651,3055,3061,3182,3450,3573,3421,3671,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.004,0.003,0.007,0.007,0.012,0.018,0.035,0.03,0.06,0.116,0.188,0.333,0.557,1.282,2.22,3.075,4.42,6.584,11.729,19.599,26.38,31.01,36.056,38.726,38.098,39.401,43.459,44.383,48.641,49.992,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Emmett"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Germany"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3383 · Black Variable ID: 3934 · Red Variable ID: 23687
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0