Report an error
Solar power generated in Germany correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Emmett | r=1 | 31yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.99 | 18yrs | No |
| Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
| US household spending on health insurance | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| US dairy skim solids used to produce cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| US milk fat used to produce cheese (excluding cottage cheese) | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Butter consumption | r=0.97 | 31yrs | Yes! |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.96 | 30yrs | No |
| The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
| Chubb's stock price (CB) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Germany also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)