about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,378 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Stevie and the second variable is Solar power generated in Brazil.  The chart goes from 1997 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Stevie made a dramatic entrance, the swish of their fabulous outfit generated just enough static electricity to power a small solar panel in Brazil. It's electrifying how Stevie's stardom is sparking renewable energy in Brazil!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling city street in Brazil, adorned with vibrant and eye-catching billboards featuring the name "Stevie" in the style of pop art. The sun-soaked scene should be adorned with sleek and modern solar panels radiating energy and glistening in the sunlight. People are shown eagerly adopting solar technology, creating an eco-friendly urban landscape bustling with vibrant energy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting a funny image you would see on reddit Woodblock painting Data cyber art Pop art
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil, in the following situation: Because the popularity of the name Stevie has skyrocketed, more people are feeling the need to channel their inner Stevie Wonder and connect with nature. This has led to a surge in demand for solar power in Brazil, as people strive to harness the sun's energy in a quest to become their own Stevie "Wonder" Woman or Man. It's clear that the power of Stevie's name is shining bright like a solar panel, illuminating the path to a greener, funkier future.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Brazil, the name Stevie is buzzing with popularity, leading more and more people to embrace solar power. Picture a crowded city street, with billboards featuring the name "Stevie" alongside sleek solar panels glistening in the sunlight. People are seen eagerly adopting solar technology, inspired by the rising popularity of the name Stevie and the desire to connect with nature, creating a vibrant and eco-friendly urban landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In Brazil, the name Stevie is buzzing with popularity, leading more and more people to embrace solar power. Picture a crowded city street, with billboards featuring the name "Stevie" alongside sleek solar panels glistening in the sunlight. People are seen eagerly adopting solar technology, inspired by the rising popularity of the name Stevie and the desire to connect with nature, creating a vibrant and eco-friendly urban landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling city street in Brazil, adorned with vibrant and eye-catching billboards featuring the name "Stevie" in the style of pop art. The sun-soaked scene should be adorned with sleek and modern solar panels radiating energy and glistening in the sunlight. People are shown eagerly adopting solar technology, creating an eco-friendly urban landscape bustling with vibrant energy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Stevie caused Solar power generated in Brazil to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil

Journal of Solar Trends and Sociolinguistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and p < 0.01 for 1997 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining web of human nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of intrigue and fascination. Throughout history, individuals have pondered the curious correlations between seemingly unrelated aspects of human existence, often leading to whimsical musings and whimsical inquiries. This paper delves into the perplexing interplay of the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the vibrant and sun-drenched nation of Brazil. While initially deemed as an incongruous and perhaps ludicrous inquiry, the data presented herein will illuminate the unexpected rapport between these two seemingly disparate domains.

The choice of the name "Stevie," with its evocative hint of playfulness and creativity, mirrors the vivacity and boundless energy of solar power generation. While one may be tempted to dismiss the connection as mere happenstance or frivolous fancy, our research endeavors to unveil the profound and captivating link between the moniker and the sustainable energy source. As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, let us not be dissuaded by the playfulness of our pursuit but instead embrace the potential revelations that may lie in the intricate dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.

As we traverse this academic expanse, we implore our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of levity and curiosity, as we embark on this unconventional exploration into the marriage of solar power and nomenclatural popularity. Let us tread lightly but resolutely, for who knows what illuminating discoveries may be waiting for us in the boundless expanse of data and discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining web of human nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of intrigue and fascination. Throughout history, individuals have pondered the curious correlations between seemingly unrelated aspects of human existence, often leading to whimsical musings and whimsical inquiries. This paper delves into the perplexing interplay of the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the vibrant and sun-drenched nation of Brazil. While initially deemed as an incongruous and perhaps ludicrous inquiry, the data presented herein will illuminate the unexpected rapport between these two seemingly disparate domains.
The choice of the name "Stevie," with its evocative hint of playfulness and creativity, mirrors the vivacity and boundless energy of solar power generation. While one may be tempted to dismiss the connection as mere happenstance or frivolous fancy, our research endeavors to unveil the profound and captivating link between the moniker and the sustainable energy source. As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, let us not be dissuaded by the playfulness of our pursuit but instead embrace the potential revelations that may lie in the intricate dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we traverse this academic expanse, we implore our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of levity and curiosity, as we embark on this unconventional exploration into the marriage of solar power and nomenclatural popularity. Let us tread lightly but resolutely, for who knows what illuminating discoveries may be waiting for us in the boundless expanse of data and discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal or environmental phenomena has been a subject of scholarly inquiry for quite some time. Smith et al. (2010) delved into the socio-cultural implications of popular given names in their seminal work, highlighting the potential influence of nomenclature on individual behavior and societal trends. Similarly, Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming patterns and their associations with environmental attitudes, revealing intriguing connections between the two domains.

Moving to the realm of environmental studies, Jones (2018) examined the factors influencing solar power adoption and renewable energy trends, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of sustainable energy generation. Such serious and rigorous scholarly works lay a solid foundation for our current investigation, as they underscore the multifaceted influences that may underpin seemingly disparate trends.

Drawing from the field of non-fiction literature, "The Solar Revolution" by Travis Bradford (2006) and "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria (2003) offer valuable insights into solar energy innovations and the cultural significance of names, respectively. These pivotal works contribute to our understanding of the broader contexts in which our inquiry unfolds.

On a more unconventional note, the fictional realm provides intriguing narratives that echo some elements of our investigation. In "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem (1961), the enigmatic interplay of human consciousness and an alien solar phenomenon invites contemplation on the mysteries surrounding solar energy. Similarly, "The Naming of the Dead" by Ian Rankin (2006) introduces a playful exploration of mortality and memory, albeit in a context quite distinct from our research focus.

Beyond the realm of traditional scholarly discourse, our endeavor encountered unexpected sources of insight. Through an unconventional approach to literature review, we stumbled upon enlightening revelations from the unlikeliest of places, including deciphering the intricate correlations from CVS receipts, deciphering the cosmic message encoded within fortune cookie fortunes, and deciphering the cryptic symbols hidden within episodes of 80s sitcoms. While these sources may raise an eyebrow or elicit a chuckle, they subtly beckon us to consider the whimsical and often unforeseen connections that may underpin our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1997 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining web of human nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of intrigue and fascination. Throughout history, individuals have pondered the curious correlations between seemingly unrelated aspects of human existence, often leading to whimsical musings and whimsical inquiries. This paper delves into the perplexing interplay of the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the vibrant and sun-drenched nation of Brazil. While initially deemed as an incongruous and perhaps ludicrous inquiry, the data presented herein will illuminate the unexpected rapport between these two seemingly disparate domains.
The choice of the name "Stevie," with its evocative hint of playfulness and creativity, mirrors the vivacity and boundless energy of solar power generation. While one may be tempted to dismiss the connection as mere happenstance or frivolous fancy, our research endeavors to unveil the profound and captivating link between the moniker and the sustainable energy source. As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, let us not be dissuaded by the playfulness of our pursuit but instead embrace the potential revelations that may lie in the intricate dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we traverse this academic expanse, we implore our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of levity and curiosity, as we embark on this unconventional exploration into the marriage of solar power and nomenclatural popularity. Let us tread lightly but resolutely, for who knows what illuminating discoveries may be waiting for us in the boundless expanse of data and discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research endeavor sought to unravel the mysterious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the solar power generated in Brazil. The approach, while unconventional in nature, endeavored to maintain rigor and adherence to established research practices, albeit with a touch of whimsy and curiosity.

Data Collection:
The primary source of data on the popularity of the name "Stevie" was the US Social Security Administration database, which offered extensive records of name occurrences from 1997 to 2021. The selection of this dataset was grounded in its comprehensive coverage of name frequencies, providing a robust foundation for our analysis. Additionally, the Energy Information Administration was consulted to ascertain the solar power generation in Brazil during the same timeframe, facilitating a thorough investigation into energy production trends.

Data Analysis:
To commence the analysis, the frequency of the name "Stevie" was meticulously scrutinized, and its temporal variations were charted to discern any discernible patterns or anomalies. Concurrently, the solar power generation data from Brazil underwent rigorous examination, allowing for the identification of potential correlations or juxtapositions with the name's prevalence. Utilizing advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analyses, the research team conducted an exhaustive exploration of the datasets, seeking to uncover any semblance of a relationship between the two variables.

Correlation Measures:
The acclaimed Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to evaluate the strength and direction of the association between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and the solar power generated in Brazil. This statistical metric served as a lighthouse, guiding our quest for coherence amidst the sea of data. Furthermore, hypothesis testing via the determination of p-values provided insight into the significance of the observed relationship, bolstering the robustness of our findings.

Control Variables:
In recognition of the multifaceted nature of societal and environmental dynamics, several control variables were considered in the analysis, encompassing demographic, economic, and climatic factors. These variables were deemed pertinent to the investigation, ensuring a comprehensive examination of potential confounding influences on the observed relationship between nomenclature and solar power generation in Brazil.

Ethical Considerations:
As the pursuit of knowledge traverses uncharted territories, ethical considerations regarding the dissemination and interpretation of findings remained paramount. It is imperative to acknowledge the light-hearted nature of this inquiry, aiming to inspire intrigue and amusement, while upholding the tenets of academic integrity and scholarly discourse.

Incorporating a blend of meticulous data analysis and a sprinkle of whimsical intrigue, the methodology encapsulates the essence of this unconventional exploration, setting the stage for the revelation of unexpected connections in the realms of nomenclature and renewable energy.

This humorous twist in research provides an unexpected and enjoyable experience for the reader to immerse themselves in the wondrous investigations of academia. Happy reading!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1997 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9734452, r-squared of 0.9475955, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining web of human nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of intrigue and fascination. Throughout history, individuals have pondered the curious correlations between seemingly unrelated aspects of human existence, often leading to whimsical musings and whimsical inquiries. This paper delves into the perplexing interplay of the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the vibrant and sun-drenched nation of Brazil. While initially deemed as an incongruous and perhaps ludicrous inquiry, the data presented herein will illuminate the unexpected rapport between these two seemingly disparate domains.
The choice of the name "Stevie," with its evocative hint of playfulness and creativity, mirrors the vivacity and boundless energy of solar power generation. While one may be tempted to dismiss the connection as mere happenstance or frivolous fancy, our research endeavors to unveil the profound and captivating link between the moniker and the sustainable energy source. As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, let us not be dissuaded by the playfulness of our pursuit but instead embrace the potential revelations that may lie in the intricate dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we traverse this academic expanse, we implore our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of levity and curiosity, as we embark on this unconventional exploration into the marriage of solar power and nomenclatural popularity. Let us tread lightly but resolutely, for who knows what illuminating discoveries may be waiting for us in the boundless expanse of data and discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation in Brazil yielded intriguing and, dare I say, enlightening results. The extensive data analysis from 1997 to 2021 unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9734452, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.9475955 and a p-value less than 0.01 further underscore the strength and statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the connection between the two is about as evident as the sun in the Brazilian sky!

Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. The data points align with unprecedented harmony, reminiscent of the celestial bodies moving in perfect cosmic choreography.

Our findings are not only statistically compelling but also provoke lighthearted contemplation about the interplay of human naming conventions and renewable energy sources. The remarkable correlation alludes to an underlying dependence that transcends mere coincidence. One might even imagine Brazil’s solar power industry drawing inspiration from the radiance of the name Stevie, harnessing the same vivacity and brightness associated with the moniker.

This unexpected linkage between nomenclature and environmental innovation challenges preconceptions and serves as a reminder of the whimsical idiosyncrasies lurking within the realm of academic inquiry. Indeed, like a solar panel soaking in the sun’s rays, our study basks in the illumination it brings to this seemingly offbeat connection. We invite readers to take a moment to marvel at the unanticipated associations our research has unearthed, appreciating the serendipitous nature of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal or environmental phenomena has been a subject of scholarly inquiry for quite some time. Smith et al. (2010) delved into the socio-cultural implications of popular given names in their seminal work, highlighting the potential influence of nomenclature on individual behavior and societal trends. Similarly, Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming patterns and their associations with environmental attitudes, revealing intriguing connections between the two domains.
Moving to the realm of environmental studies, Jones (2018) examined the factors influencing solar power adoption and renewable energy trends, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of sustainable energy generation. Such serious and rigorous scholarly works lay a solid foundation for our current investigation, as they underscore the multifaceted influences that may underpin seemingly disparate trends.
Drawing from the field of non-fiction literature, "The Solar Revolution" by Travis Bradford (2006) and "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria (2003) offer valuable insights into solar energy innovations and the cultural significance of names, respectively. These pivotal works contribute to our understanding of the broader contexts in which our inquiry unfolds.
On a more unconventional note, the fictional realm provides intriguing narratives that echo some elements of our investigation. In "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem (1961), the enigmatic interplay of human consciousness and an alien solar phenomenon invites contemplation on the mysteries surrounding solar energy. Similarly, "The Naming of the Dead" by Ian Rankin (2006) introduces a playful exploration of mortality and memory, albeit in a context quite distinct from our research focus.
Beyond the realm of traditional scholarly discourse, our endeavor encountered unexpected sources of insight. Through an unconventional approach to literature review, we stumbled upon enlightening revelations from the unlikeliest of places, including deciphering the intricate correlations from CVS receipts, deciphering the cosmic message encoded within fortune cookie fortunes, and deciphering the cryptic symbols hidden within episodes of 80s sitcoms. While these sources may raise an eyebrow or elicit a chuckle, they subtly beckon us to consider the whimsical and often unforeseen connections that may underpin our scholarly pursuits.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation in Brazil yielded intriguing and, dare I say, enlightening results. The extensive data analysis from 1997 to 2021 unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9734452, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.9475955 and a p-value less than 0.01 further underscore the strength and statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the connection between the two is about as evident as the sun in the Brazilian sky!
Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. The data points align with unprecedented harmony, reminiscent of the celestial bodies moving in perfect cosmic choreography.
Our findings are not only statistically compelling but also provoke lighthearted contemplation about the interplay of human naming conventions and renewable energy sources. The remarkable correlation alludes to an underlying dependence that transcends mere coincidence. One might even imagine Brazil’s solar power industry drawing inspiration from the radiance of the name Stevie, harnessing the same vivacity and brightness associated with the moniker.
This unexpected linkage between nomenclature and environmental innovation challenges preconceptions and serves as a reminder of the whimsical idiosyncrasies lurking within the realm of academic inquiry. Indeed, like a solar panel soaking in the sun’s rays, our study basks in the illumination it brings to this seemingly offbeat connection. We invite readers to take a moment to marvel at the unanticipated associations our research has unearthed, appreciating the serendipitous nature of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation vividly illuminate the intriguing connection between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation in Brazil. Our findings align with previous research that explored the influence of naming patterns on societal and environmental phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9734452, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence for the association between these seemingly disparate variables. This strong statistical support echoes the earlier inquiries into the social and environmental influence of nomenclature, underscoring the whimsical yet significant role that names may play in shaping societal trends and environmental choices.

Drawing from the literature review, the unconventional yet captivating narratives and sources touched upon therein also resonate with our findings, albeit in a more unexpected manner. The playful exploration of mortality and memory in "The Naming of the Dead" by Ian Rankin now carries a subtle resonance with our study, reminding us of the unanticipated connections that can be unraveled through scholarly pursuits. The whimsical and often unforeseen nature of the correlations unearthed through alternate sources of insight feels like a cosmic message encoded within fortune cookie fortunes, urging us to consider the unexpected and delightful intersections of seemingly unrelated domains.

The striking correlation depicted in our scatterplot not only underscores the strength of the relationship but also beckons contemplation about the potential influences of nomenclature on innovation and environmental choices. A lighthearted consideration of our results might even lead one to imagine the solar power industry drawing inspiration from the radiance associated with the name Stevie, mirroring the vivacity and brightness embodied by the moniker. This subtle interplay of human naming conventions and environmental innovations echoes the enigmatic interplay of human consciousness and an alien solar phenomenon in "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem, providing a playful yet thought-provoking parallel to our observations.

While the unexpected linkage between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation may initially elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it invites contemplation about the delightful idiosyncrasies lurking within the scholarly realm. Our study not only sheds light on this whimsical connection but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the serendipitous nature of academic exploration. Like the sun's rays on a solar panel, our findings beckon readers to bask in the illumination of this seemingly offbeat yet captivating association, inspiring newfound appreciation for the delightful quirks that underpin scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining web of human nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of intrigue and fascination. Throughout history, individuals have pondered the curious correlations between seemingly unrelated aspects of human existence, often leading to whimsical musings and whimsical inquiries. This paper delves into the perplexing interplay of the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the vibrant and sun-drenched nation of Brazil. While initially deemed as an incongruous and perhaps ludicrous inquiry, the data presented herein will illuminate the unexpected rapport between these two seemingly disparate domains.
The choice of the name "Stevie," with its evocative hint of playfulness and creativity, mirrors the vivacity and boundless energy of solar power generation. While one may be tempted to dismiss the connection as mere happenstance or frivolous fancy, our research endeavors to unveil the profound and captivating link between the moniker and the sustainable energy source. As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, let us not be dissuaded by the playfulness of our pursuit but instead embrace the potential revelations that may lie in the intricate dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we traverse this academic expanse, we implore our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of levity and curiosity, as we embark on this unconventional exploration into the marriage of solar power and nomenclatural popularity. Let us tread lightly but resolutely, for who knows what illuminating discoveries may be waiting for us in the boundless expanse of data and discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation in Brazil yielded intriguing and, dare I say, enlightening results. The extensive data analysis from 1997 to 2021 unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9734452, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.9475955 and a p-value less than 0.01 further underscore the strength and statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the connection between the two is about as evident as the sun in the Brazilian sky!
Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. The data points align with unprecedented harmony, reminiscent of the celestial bodies moving in perfect cosmic choreography.
Our findings are not only statistically compelling but also provoke lighthearted contemplation about the interplay of human naming conventions and renewable energy sources. The remarkable correlation alludes to an underlying dependence that transcends mere coincidence. One might even imagine Brazil’s solar power industry drawing inspiration from the radiance of the name Stevie, harnessing the same vivacity and brightness associated with the moniker.
This unexpected linkage between nomenclature and environmental innovation challenges preconceptions and serves as a reminder of the whimsical idiosyncrasies lurking within the realm of academic inquiry. Indeed, like a solar panel soaking in the sun’s rays, our study basks in the illumination it brings to this seemingly offbeat connection. We invite readers to take a moment to marvel at the unanticipated associations our research has unearthed, appreciating the serendipitous nature of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the radiant correlation between the popularity of the name Stevie and solar power generation in Brazil has brought a lighthearted glow to the realm of academic inquiry. Our findings not only suggest a strong statistical association, but also beckon the playful spirit of curiosity and whimsy in examining seemingly unimaginable connections. It is as if the beaming sun has momentarily peeked through the clouds of skepticism to shed light on this unexpected relationship. The enchanting bond between nomenclature and environmental innovation demonstrates the whimsical idiosyncrasies nestled within scholarly pursuit.

As we reflect on our jovial journey through this unconventional exploration, it is evident that no further research is needed in this area. The results stand as luminous testimony to the remarkable correlation, and additional investigations may unduly dim the luster of this playful discovery. With that, we invite readers to savor the delightful revelations of this study and to embrace the serendipitous nature of academic inquiry. After all, in the scholarly pursuit of enlightenment, we mustn't dismiss the twinkle of mirth and curiosity that illuminates our path.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Solar Trends and Sociolinguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Institute for Solar-Powered Names Research (GISNR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sunshine Stevie: Illuminating the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Solar Power Generation in Brazil with an abstract of This paper investigates the peculiar yet captivating relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the solar power generated in Brazil. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1997 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9734452 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two variables. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this investigation, the results gleamed like sunlight on a solar panel, shedding light on the unexpected connection between seemingly unrelated factors. The implications of this study stretch far and wide, providing a playful peek into the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and environmental innovation.

ChatGPT:

Sunshine Stevie, popularity of name Stevie, solar power generation, Brazil, correlation coefficient, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, statistical analysis, association between variables, nomenclature, environmental innovation, solar panel, solar energy, Brazil solar power data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Stevie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Stevie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Stevie

Solar power generated in Brazil
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Brazil in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Brazil

Correlation r = 0.9734452 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9475955 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Brazil) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Stevie) over the 25 years from 1997 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-16. 0.0000000000000003161031361809
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 3.2E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,163,524,449,905,231 random variables You don't actually need 3 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Stevie (Babies born)3183072432472362172322152112522292172402102272542603183123794444736298011147
Solar power generated in Brazil (Billion kWh)0.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00020.00020.00020.00020.00020.0010.0020.0020.0050.0170.0586520.0844980.8271033.441066.5880310.642316.752




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([318,307,243,247,236,217,232,215,211,252,229,217,240,210,227,254,260,318,312,379,444,473,629,801,1147,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0002,0.0002,0.0002,0.0002,0.0002,0.001,0.002,0.002,0.005,0.017,0.058652,0.084498,0.827103,3.44106,6.58803,10.6423,16.752,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Stevie"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Brazil"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3378 · Black Variable ID: 3190 · Red Variable ID: 23540
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0