Report an error
Solar power generated in Brazil correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.98 | 17yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.97 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'that is sus' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of veterinary assistants in Colorado | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sonny | r=0.94 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Santana | r=0.88 | 25yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Duluth | r=0.79 | 25yrs | No |
| Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year | r=0.78 | 15yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Brazil also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)