about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,374 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and the second variable is Assistant Processor salaries in the US.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With fewer traffic technicians in Massachusetts, there was less congestion on the roads. This led to a decrease in demand for assistant processors, who specialize in handling traffic citation paperwork. With less work available, employers were able to offer lower salaries, creating a ripple effect in the job market across the US.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a team of traffic technicians working in Massachusetts. The technicians are shown analyzing traffic data and implementing advanced algorithms to optimize traffic flow. In the background, Assistant Professors in the US are seen easily moving through traffic as it becomes smoother, visibly leading to an increase in their salaries and more time for research. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s a funny image you would see on reddit Symbolism Vaporwave
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US, in the following situation: Because as the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts increases, they start using advanced algorithms to optimize traffic flow, allowing Assistant Professors to spend less time stuck in traffic and more time focusing on research, leading to an increase in their salaries.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Massachusetts, a growing team of traffic technicians diligently work on implementing advanced algorithms to optimize traffic flow. As traffic becomes smoother, Assistant Professors in the US are seen spending less time stuck in traffic and more time focused on their research. Meanwhile, their salaries are visibly increasing, symbolizing the positive impact of improved traffic flow on their professional lives.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In Massachusetts, a growing team of traffic technicians diligently work on implementing advanced algorithms to optimize traffic flow. As traffic becomes smoother, Assistant Professors in the US are seen spending less time stuck in traffic and more time focused on their research. Meanwhile, their salaries are visibly increasing, symbolizing the positive impact of improved traffic flow on their professional lives. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a team of traffic technicians working in Massachusetts. The technicians are shown analyzing traffic data and implementing advanced algorithms to optimize traffic flow. In the background, Assistant Professors in the US are seen easily moving through traffic as it becomes smoother, visibly leading to an increase in their salaries and more time for research.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts caused Assistant Processor salaries in the US to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US

Journal of Interdisciplinary Observations on Societal Quirks

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the perpetual traffic jam of societal dynamics, there are some unexpected intersections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such curious crossroads is the surprising connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. It's a conundrum that seems to defy logic, much like trying to make a left turn during rush hour.

As we pondered this perplexing correlation, we were struck by the notion that perhaps there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. After all, who would have thought that the number of individuals working tirelessly to tame the chaos of traffic in one state could have any bearing on the compensation of academic scholars nationwide? It's a statistical riddle that beckoned us to unravel its intricacies, much like deciphering a cryptic road sign on a foggy morning.

With a raised eyebrow and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out on a mission to disentangle this improbable correlation using data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. We braved the treacherous terrain of numbers and variables, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a willingness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns with a sprinkle of levity.

As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite you to join us on this statistical joyride through the labyrinthine streets of academia and labor economics. Our journey promises to be a blend of rigorous analysis and lighthearted observation, much like the fleeting feeling of triumph when finding a sneaky shortcut through the gridlock. So buckle up and prepare to embark on an illuminating expedition into the curiously entangled realms of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Let's navigate this complex terrain with a pinch of humor and a truckload of statistical precision.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the perpetual traffic jam of societal dynamics, there are some unexpected intersections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such curious crossroads is the surprising connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. It's a conundrum that seems to defy logic, much like trying to make a left turn during rush hour.
As we pondered this perplexing correlation, we were struck by the notion that perhaps there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. After all, who would have thought that the number of individuals working tirelessly to tame the chaos of traffic in one state could have any bearing on the compensation of academic scholars nationwide? It's a statistical riddle that beckoned us to unravel its intricacies, much like deciphering a cryptic road sign on a foggy morning.
With a raised eyebrow and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out on a mission to disentangle this improbable correlation using data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. We braved the treacherous terrain of numbers and variables, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a willingness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns with a sprinkle of levity.
As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite you to join us on this statistical joyride through the labyrinthine streets of academia and labor economics. Our journey promises to be a blend of rigorous analysis and lighthearted observation, much like the fleeting feeling of triumph when finding a sneaky shortcut through the gridlock. So buckle up and prepare to embark on an illuminating expedition into the curiously entangled realms of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Let's navigate this complex terrain with a pinch of humor and a truckload of statistical precision.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Interplay of Labor Markets and Educational Institutions," Smith and Doe lay the groundwork for understanding the intricate relationship between seemingly disparate professions. Their research delves into the multifaceted dynamics of labor markets and educational institutions, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface. Much like a traffic technician navigating through a labyrinth of congested streets, the authors skillfully navigate the convoluted interplay of these societal components. Yet, as we venture further into the landscape of academic inquiry, we discover a road less traveled, one paved with puns and quirky observations.

In "Traffic: An Economic Analysis," Jones et al. offer a comprehensive examination of traffic patterns and their economic implications, providing a wealth of insights into the complexities of urban transportation. On the surface, their work may seem worlds apart from our focus on assistant professor salaries, but fear not, dear reader. We are about to embark on a detour into the realm of unexpected connections and humor-infused analysis. We'll take a moment to stop and smell the statistical roses before venturing into uncharted territories of academic inquiry.

Now, let us not overlook the wisdom to be gleaned from the hallowed tomes of non-fiction. Books such as "Freakonomics" and "Blink" offer intriguing perspectives on the interplay of economic forces and rapid decision-making. They serve as guiding lights, illuminating the unexplored alleyways of statistical analysis with a dash of intellectual whimsy. And speaking of whimsy, who would have thought that "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" could offer inspiration in our quest for understanding the tangled relationship between traffic technicians and assistant professor salaries? Yet, here we are, ready to dive headfirst into the rabbit hole of statistical inquiry with a spring in our step and a twinkle in our eye.

As we navigate this uncharted territory, let us not forget the valuable lessons that board games like "The Game of Life" and "Monopoly" have to offer. These seemingly innocuous pastimes provide a microcosm of economic and career-related decision-making, offering analogies that intertwine with the quirky connections we are set to explore. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the annals of academic literature, where we merge statistical rigor with a kaleidoscope of unexpected insights and whimsical observations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the perpetual traffic jam of societal dynamics, there are some unexpected intersections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such curious crossroads is the surprising connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. It's a conundrum that seems to defy logic, much like trying to make a left turn during rush hour.
As we pondered this perplexing correlation, we were struck by the notion that perhaps there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. After all, who would have thought that the number of individuals working tirelessly to tame the chaos of traffic in one state could have any bearing on the compensation of academic scholars nationwide? It's a statistical riddle that beckoned us to unravel its intricacies, much like deciphering a cryptic road sign on a foggy morning.
With a raised eyebrow and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out on a mission to disentangle this improbable correlation using data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. We braved the treacherous terrain of numbers and variables, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a willingness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns with a sprinkle of levity.
As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite you to join us on this statistical joyride through the labyrinthine streets of academia and labor economics. Our journey promises to be a blend of rigorous analysis and lighthearted observation, much like the fleeting feeling of triumph when finding a sneaky shortcut through the gridlock. So buckle up and prepare to embark on an illuminating expedition into the curiously entangled realms of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Let's navigate this complex terrain with a pinch of humor and a truckload of statistical precision.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the perplexing correlation between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors in the United States, a comprehensive methodology was devised to navigate the statistical boulevards and alleys of this curious relationship.

Data Collection:
The primary data sources for this investigation were the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. These reputable repositories provided a treasure trove of information spanning the years 2009 to 2021, allowing us to capture the temporal nuances of the phenomenon. We meticulously combed through various datasets, extracting the counts of traffic technicians employed in Massachusetts and the prevailing salaries of assistant professors across the United States. While we utilized the latest statistical software for data retrieval, we refrained from employing traffic signal timing algorithms to avoid any unintended green-light biases in our dataset.

Data Analysis:
To wrangle the plethora of data into a coherent narrative, a blend of quantitative analyses and merited puns was employed. We initially conducted a descriptive statistical analysis to assess the central tendencies and dispersion of the variables in question, all the while resisting the urge to calculate the standard deviation of commuter frustration. Subsequently, a Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to unveil the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous factors. To bolster the robustness of our findings, we implemented a bootstrapping technique to construct confidence intervals that would withstand even the most tumultuous traffic jams.

Statistical Control:
To mitigate the potential influence of confounding variables such as regional traffic density and academic discipline, we strategically employed multivariate regression models and quirky anecdotes to tease apart the unique impact of traffic technicians in the academic salary landscape. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability and resilience of the observed correlation in the face of unexpected detours and road closures in our datasets.

Peer Validation:
In adherence to scholarly rigor, the methodology and findings were subjected to rigorous peer review. Colleagues were invited to express their astonishment at the correlation and to confirm that our statistical maneuvers were not merely a case of parallel parking luck. Their insights and constructive criticisms were incorporated into the final analysis, ensuring that our research embodies the highest standards of academic integrity and whimsical observation.

In summary, our methodology navigated the statistical highways and byways with precision and a sprinkle of levity, illuminating the unexpected linkage between traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the United States. This approach not only dismantled the statistical roadblocks but also reaffirmed the paramount importance of scholarly inquiry in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9409011, r-squared of 0.8852948, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the perpetual traffic jam of societal dynamics, there are some unexpected intersections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such curious crossroads is the surprising connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. It's a conundrum that seems to defy logic, much like trying to make a left turn during rush hour.
As we pondered this perplexing correlation, we were struck by the notion that perhaps there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. After all, who would have thought that the number of individuals working tirelessly to tame the chaos of traffic in one state could have any bearing on the compensation of academic scholars nationwide? It's a statistical riddle that beckoned us to unravel its intricacies, much like deciphering a cryptic road sign on a foggy morning.
With a raised eyebrow and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out on a mission to disentangle this improbable correlation using data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. We braved the treacherous terrain of numbers and variables, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a willingness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns with a sprinkle of levity.
As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite you to join us on this statistical joyride through the labyrinthine streets of academia and labor economics. Our journey promises to be a blend of rigorous analysis and lighthearted observation, much like the fleeting feeling of triumph when finding a sneaky shortcut through the gridlock. So buckle up and prepare to embark on an illuminating expedition into the curiously entangled realms of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Let's navigate this complex terrain with a pinch of humor and a truckload of statistical precision.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. Over the 2009 to 2021 period, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9409011, which points to a robust linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was also supported by an r-squared value of 0.8852948, indicating that approximately 88.5% of the variability in assistant professor salaries can be explained by the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings further substantiate the strength and significance of this association.

To visually convey this striking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong positive correlation between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. As Fig. 1 illustrates, the data points align themselves along a clear upward trajectory, depicting the unmistakable synchronized movement of these two variables. It's as if they're carpooling together on the statistical highway, with one's trajectory influencing the other's speed and direction. It's a statistical road trip you don't want to miss!

Our empirical examination provides compelling evidence of this unanticipated connection. While we are keenly aware that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of this relationship raises intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. Much like navigating the complex web of traffic signals and detours, our investigation into this uncommon correlation calls for further exploration to uncover the underlying factors driving this unexpectedly intertwined narrative.

In summary, our findings lend empirical support to the curious coalescence of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. This unexpected intersection of labor dynamics and academia invites further inquiry and underscores the value of taking an unconventional route in the pursuit of illuminating insights. As we continue to traverse these uncharted statistical byways, our journey promises to shed light on the intricate connections that underpin the tapestry of societal phenomena. Join us as we navigate this statistical terrain with the precision of a GPS and the levity of a well-timed traffic pun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Interplay of Labor Markets and Educational Institutions," Smith and Doe lay the groundwork for understanding the intricate relationship between seemingly disparate professions. Their research delves into the multifaceted dynamics of labor markets and educational institutions, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface. Much like a traffic technician navigating through a labyrinth of congested streets, the authors skillfully navigate the convoluted interplay of these societal components. Yet, as we venture further into the landscape of academic inquiry, we discover a road less traveled, one paved with puns and quirky observations.
In "Traffic: An Economic Analysis," Jones et al. offer a comprehensive examination of traffic patterns and their economic implications, providing a wealth of insights into the complexities of urban transportation. On the surface, their work may seem worlds apart from our focus on assistant professor salaries, but fear not, dear reader. We are about to embark on a detour into the realm of unexpected connections and humor-infused analysis. We'll take a moment to stop and smell the statistical roses before venturing into uncharted territories of academic inquiry.
Now, let us not overlook the wisdom to be gleaned from the hallowed tomes of non-fiction. Books such as "Freakonomics" and "Blink" offer intriguing perspectives on the interplay of economic forces and rapid decision-making. They serve as guiding lights, illuminating the unexplored alleyways of statistical analysis with a dash of intellectual whimsy. And speaking of whimsy, who would have thought that "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" could offer inspiration in our quest for understanding the tangled relationship between traffic technicians and assistant professor salaries? Yet, here we are, ready to dive headfirst into the rabbit hole of statistical inquiry with a spring in our step and a twinkle in our eye.
As we navigate this uncharted territory, let us not forget the valuable lessons that board games like "The Game of Life" and "Monopoly" have to offer. These seemingly innocuous pastimes provide a microcosm of economic and career-related decision-making, offering analogies that intertwine with the quirky connections we are set to explore. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the annals of academic literature, where we merge statistical rigor with a kaleidoscope of unexpected insights and whimsical observations.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. Over the 2009 to 2021 period, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9409011, which points to a robust linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was also supported by an r-squared value of 0.8852948, indicating that approximately 88.5% of the variability in assistant professor salaries can be explained by the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings further substantiate the strength and significance of this association.
To visually convey this striking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong positive correlation between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. As Fig. 1 illustrates, the data points align themselves along a clear upward trajectory, depicting the unmistakable synchronized movement of these two variables. It's as if they're carpooling together on the statistical highway, with one's trajectory influencing the other's speed and direction. It's a statistical road trip you don't want to miss!
Our empirical examination provides compelling evidence of this unanticipated connection. While we are keenly aware that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of this relationship raises intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. Much like navigating the complex web of traffic signals and detours, our investigation into this uncommon correlation calls for further exploration to uncover the underlying factors driving this unexpectedly intertwined narrative.
In summary, our findings lend empirical support to the curious coalescence of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. This unexpected intersection of labor dynamics and academia invites further inquiry and underscores the value of taking an unconventional route in the pursuit of illuminating insights. As we continue to traverse these uncharted statistical byways, our journey promises to shed light on the intricate connections that underpin the tapestry of societal phenomena. Join us as we navigate this statistical terrain with the precision of a GPS and the levity of a well-timed traffic pun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only deepen our understanding of the unexpected connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States but also align with prior research that harnessed the power of statistical analysis to uncover seemingly disparate correlations.

As we navigate this discussion, much like a traffic technician expertly maneuvering through a congested intersection, we reflect on the whimsical yet informative journey of our literature review. Our detour into unexpected connections and humor-infused analysis takes a serious turn as we discuss the serious implications of the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with a p-value of less than 0.01 that we uncovered. These results not only support our initial hypotheses but also resonate with the insights from Smith and Doe's pioneering work on the interplay of labor markets and educational institutions, albeit perhaps with a touch more levity.

Expanding upon Jones et al.'s economic analysis of traffic patterns and their implications, our study provides additional empirical evidence of the interwoven nature of seemingly unrelated professions and salary dynamics. Our results offer a concrete example of the unexpected connections that can emerge from the tapestry of societal phenomena, not unlike the surprising twists and turns encountered during a rush hour commute.

Returning to the vivid imagery evoked in our literature review, it is as if our findings paint a vivid picture of traffic technicians and assistant professors coexisting on a metaphorical statistical highway, each influencing the trajectory and speed of the other. Much like a well-played board game, the outcomes of their respective paths are intricately linked, echoing the insights gleaned from seemingly innocuous pastimes that serve as microcosms of economic and career-related decision-making.

With a spring in our metaphorical step and a twinkle in our statistical eye, we find that our findings align with the playful spirit of intellectual whimsy exemplified in "Freakonomics" and "Blink." The unexpected convergence of traffic technicians and academic pay scales serves as a testament to the uncharted territories of statistical inquiry that these works ardently champion.

In summary, our study's results offer empirical support for the surprising relationship between traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. We embrace the value of taking an unconventional route in our pursuit of illuminating insights, and our journey promises to further shed light on the intricate connections within the labor market and academia. Join us as we continue navigating this statistical terrain with the precision of a GPS and the occasional quip to keep the journey lighthearted.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Processor salaries in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the perpetual traffic jam of societal dynamics, there are some unexpected intersections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such curious crossroads is the surprising connection between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. It's a conundrum that seems to defy logic, much like trying to make a left turn during rush hour.
As we pondered this perplexing correlation, we were struck by the notion that perhaps there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. After all, who would have thought that the number of individuals working tirelessly to tame the chaos of traffic in one state could have any bearing on the compensation of academic scholars nationwide? It's a statistical riddle that beckoned us to unravel its intricacies, much like deciphering a cryptic road sign on a foggy morning.
With a raised eyebrow and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out on a mission to disentangle this improbable correlation using data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. We braved the treacherous terrain of numbers and variables, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a willingness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns with a sprinkle of levity.
As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite you to join us on this statistical joyride through the labyrinthine streets of academia and labor economics. Our journey promises to be a blend of rigorous analysis and lighthearted observation, much like the fleeting feeling of triumph when finding a sneaky shortcut through the gridlock. So buckle up and prepare to embark on an illuminating expedition into the curiously entangled realms of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Let's navigate this complex terrain with a pinch of humor and a truckload of statistical precision.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. Over the 2009 to 2021 period, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9409011, which points to a robust linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was also supported by an r-squared value of 0.8852948, indicating that approximately 88.5% of the variability in assistant professor salaries can be explained by the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings further substantiate the strength and significance of this association.
To visually convey this striking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong positive correlation between the number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. As Fig. 1 illustrates, the data points align themselves along a clear upward trajectory, depicting the unmistakable synchronized movement of these two variables. It's as if they're carpooling together on the statistical highway, with one's trajectory influencing the other's speed and direction. It's a statistical road trip you don't want to miss!
Our empirical examination provides compelling evidence of this unanticipated connection. While we are keenly aware that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of this relationship raises intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. Much like navigating the complex web of traffic signals and detours, our investigation into this uncommon correlation calls for further exploration to uncover the underlying factors driving this unexpectedly intertwined narrative.
In summary, our findings lend empirical support to the curious coalescence of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US. This unexpected intersection of labor dynamics and academia invites further inquiry and underscores the value of taking an unconventional route in the pursuit of illuminating insights. As we continue to traverse these uncharted statistical byways, our journey promises to shed light on the intricate connections that underpin the tapestry of societal phenomena. Join us as we navigate this statistical terrain with the precision of a GPS and the levity of a well-timed traffic pun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our expedition into the unlikely nexus of traffic technicians in Massachusetts and assistant professor salaries in the US has yielded fascinating insights and a fair share of statistical amusement. Our findings have illuminated a convincing correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, akin to the uncanny alignment of traffic lights during a smooth rush hour commute.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011, akin to the convergence of synchronized turn signals at a busy intersection, underscores the compelling relationship we've uncovered. The r-squared value of 0.8852948 further underscores the coherence in the movement of these variables, much like a perfectly choreographed traffic flow guided by an unseen hand.

Our scatterplot, which visually encapsulates this unexpected partnership, presents a charming tableau of convergence that would make even the most seasoned traffic technician crack a smile. It's as if the ebb and flow of traffic and academic compensation have found a harmonious rhythm, not unlike the smooth coordination of a well-orchestrated ballet.

While our study reinforces the statistical significance of this association, we acknowledge the need for caution in ascribing causation. After all, attributing academic pay scales to the intricacies of traffic management would be like claiming that rush hour traffic is orchestrated to punctuate the end of a workday.

However, our exploration calls for further scrutiny, much like a thorough inspection of a malfunctioning traffic light. The delightful surprise of this improbable linkage invites scholars to venture into the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary investigation, where the journey promises unexpected twists and fascinating detours.

In the spirit of academic inquiry and statistical merriment, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to heed the "yield" sign and make a U-turn towards other captivating statistical curiosities. As we bid adieu to this unanticipated statistical sojourn, let us remember that sometimes, in the convoluted web of societal dynamics, the most absurd connections hold the keys to the most illuminating revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Interdisciplinary Observations on Societal Quirks


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Transportation Studies and Economic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stuck in Traffic: An Insightful Analysis of the Relentless Relationship Between Traffic Technicians in Massachusetts and Assistant Professor Salaries in the US with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on an exploratory journey to uncover the connect-I-cut between the number of traffic technicians in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the salaries of assistant professors across the United States. By delving into data from the Bureau of "Larbor" Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9409011 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our findings not only provide a thorough understanding of this unexpected linkage but also shed light on the interplay of seemingly unrelated factors in the tangled web of societal dynamics. We navigate the twists and turns of this peculiar relationship with statistical precision and a dash of humor, paving the way for further investigation into the intriguing intersection of traffic technicians and academic pay scales. Join us on this joyride through the statistical streets of academia and labor economics!

ChatGPT:

traffic technicians, Massachusetts, assistant professor salaries, US, Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, academic pay scales, labor economics, societal dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of traffic technicians in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts

Assistant Processor salaries in the US
Detailed data title: Average salary of full-time instructional faculty on 9-month contracts in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by academic rank of Assistant Professor
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Assistant Processor salaries in the US

Correlation r = 0.9409011 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8852948 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Assistant Processor salaries in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-6. 0.0000016645967626814577000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 600,746 random variables You don't actually need 600 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts (Traffic Technicians)14013012050505024025026028027027090
Assistant Processor salaries in the US (Salary)80996805387933078838793308053982117833888351283633844818348279398




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([140,130,120,50,50,50,240,250,260,280,270,270,90,])
array_2 = np.array([80996,80538,79330,78838,79330,80539,82117,83388,83512,83633,84481,83482,79398,])
array_1_name = "The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Assistant Processor salaries in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3374 · Black Variable ID: 9574 · Red Variable ID: 1203
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0