Report an error
Assistant Processor salaries in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of paralegals in Arizona | r=0.96 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of registered nurses in Illinois | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
The number of lifeguards and ski patrol in Vermont | r=0.96 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of surgical technologists in Puerto Rico | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in Texas | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
The number of traffic technicians in Massachusetts | r=0.94 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of executive administrative assistants in South Dakota | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
The number of amusement park attendants in South Carolina | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
How professional-sounding LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Spain | r=0.9 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Robberies in Alaska | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joanna | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in Iran | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
Wins for the Chicago Cubs | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Hot days in Paris | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.84 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.81 | 13yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Venus | r=0.7 | 13yrs | No |
Assistant Processor salaries in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)