about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,342 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and the second variable is US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university economics teachers in Idaho increased, so did the understanding of supply and demand. This led to a nationwide surge in the artificial Christmas tree market, as consumers responded to the newfound knowledge with heightened enthusiasm for festive economics. This of course, resulted in an unexpected boost in holiday tree sales throughout the United States.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic university classroom in Idaho, with economics teachers leading a discussion on supply and demand. Outside the classroom, depict a line of sleek, automated trucks carrying artificial Christmas trees, ready to be shipped out across the US. The scene should convey a sense of technological advancement and the intersection of traditional concepts like economics with modern distribution methods. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk High-tech inspired by bauhaus Macabre Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees, in the following situation: Because economics teachers in Idaho taught students about the concept of supply and demand, leading to an increased understanding and demand for artificial Christmas trees across the US.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Idaho, a handful of university economics teachers are seen leading a classroom discussion on supply and demand, while outside, a line of trucks is shown carrying artificial Christmas trees to be shipped out across the US.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In Idaho, a handful of university economics teachers are seen leading a classroom discussion on supply and demand, while outside, a line of trucks is shown carrying artificial Christmas trees to be shipped out across the US. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic university classroom in Idaho, with economics teachers leading a discussion on supply and demand. Outside the classroom, depict a line of sleek, automated trucks carrying artificial Christmas trees, ready to be shipped out across the US. The scene should convey a sense of technological advancement and the intersection of traditional concepts like economics with modern distribution methods.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university economics teachers in Idaho caused US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

Journal of Economic Arboretum Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

"Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US" is a study that ventures into the verdant and often overlooked terrain of the Christmas tree market to explore the relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This research is a jolly effort to unearth the roots of consumer behavior during the festive season, with a whimsical quest to find out if economics educators have been playing a part in sprucing up the holiday market.

From an empirical standpoint, the combination of university economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales seems as improbable as finding a squirrel nestled within the branches. However, the goal of this study is to branch out and investigate this unlikely correlation, bringing a novel perspective to the field of economics and enlivening the discussion with a touch of holiday cheer.

The coniferous connection we are about to explore is not merely a flimsy twig in the vast forest of economic research; rather, it represents a unique opportunity to dig deep into the soil of consumer decision-making and uncover the hidden roots of economic influence on holiday purchases. By blending statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, this research seeks to spark curiosity and celebrate the festive spirit of inquiry in a field not typically associated with tinsel and trimmings.

As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite readers to join in the merriment and embrace the unexpected twists and turns that await in our exploration of the effervescent economics of holiday tree sales. So, grab a cup of cocoa, adjust your Santa hat, and let's unravel the captivating tale of economics teachers and their sapid impact on the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees in the US.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US" is a study that ventures into the verdant and often overlooked terrain of the Christmas tree market to explore the relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This research is a jolly effort to unearth the roots of consumer behavior during the festive season, with a whimsical quest to find out if economics educators have been playing a part in sprucing up the holiday market.
From an empirical standpoint, the combination of university economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales seems as improbable as finding a squirrel nestled within the branches. However, the goal of this study is to branch out and investigate this unlikely correlation, bringing a novel perspective to the field of economics and enlivening the discussion with a touch of holiday cheer.
The coniferous connection we are about to explore is not merely a flimsy twig in the vast forest of economic research; rather, it represents a unique opportunity to dig deep into the soil of consumer decision-making and uncover the hidden roots of economic influence on holiday purchases. By blending statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, this research seeks to spark curiosity and celebrate the festive spirit of inquiry in a field not typically associated with tinsel and trimmings.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite readers to join in the merriment and embrace the unexpected twists and turns that await in our exploration of the effervescent economics of holiday tree sales. So, grab a cup of cocoa, adjust your Santa hat, and let's unravel the captivating tale of economics teachers and their sapid impact on the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees in the US.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The burgeoning field of research on the interplay between university economics teachers and consumer behavior during the festive season has elicited scholarly inquiry, albeit in a somewhat unexpected manner. Smith et al., in their seminal work "Economic Educators and Yuletide Yields," delved into the whimsical landscape of holiday market dynamics and hinted at the potential influence of economic education on purchasing decisions related to festive decorations. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in their treatise "The Economic Roots of Christmas Cheer," hinted at the arboreal implications of economic pedagogy as they pertain to the sales of artificial conifers during the holiday season.

Moving beyond the academic purview, real-world literature has also offered glimpses into the enigmatic relationship between economic education and holiday consumerism. "Economic Theory and Christmas Trees: A Case Study in Unexpected Connections" by Greenbaum captures the essence of this improbable association, weaving a narrative that introduces the concept of fiscal literacy seeping into the realms of tinsel and baubles. Furthermore, "Money, Mistletoe, and Market Forces" by Redmond et al. takes a candid look at the influence of economic theories on the sale and distribution of holiday trinkets and decorations, providing insightful parallels to the nuanced impact of economic educators on seasonal market trends.

Building upon this foundation, fictional works such as “The Merchant of Christmas: A Tale of Seasonal Supply and Demand” by Austen and “The Economic Enigma of Evergreen Exchanges” by Dickens offer hypothetical musings on the intertwining of economic principles and the holiday commerce landscape. While their narratives do not offer empirical evidence, these literary diversions serve as delightful ponderings on the potential sway of economic teachings on the market for artificial Christmas trees.

Fascinatingly, there are indirect connections present in popular board games as well. The game "Stocks and Spruces" mirrors real-world economic principles, weaving in the vibrant display of miniature Christmas trees as a form of investment, hinting at the multifaceted entanglement of economic teachings and festive décor.

In sum, the literature reveals a lighthearted but thought-provoking tapestry of academic and fanciful works that ponder the curious nexus between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. While the seed of this connection may have appeared unlikely, the interdisciplinary exploration it has inspired stands as a testament to the enduring whimsy and wonder of the academic enterprise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2010 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US" is a study that ventures into the verdant and often overlooked terrain of the Christmas tree market to explore the relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This research is a jolly effort to unearth the roots of consumer behavior during the festive season, with a whimsical quest to find out if economics educators have been playing a part in sprucing up the holiday market.
From an empirical standpoint, the combination of university economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales seems as improbable as finding a squirrel nestled within the branches. However, the goal of this study is to branch out and investigate this unlikely correlation, bringing a novel perspective to the field of economics and enlivening the discussion with a touch of holiday cheer.
The coniferous connection we are about to explore is not merely a flimsy twig in the vast forest of economic research; rather, it represents a unique opportunity to dig deep into the soil of consumer decision-making and uncover the hidden roots of economic influence on holiday purchases. By blending statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, this research seeks to spark curiosity and celebrate the festive spirit of inquiry in a field not typically associated with tinsel and trimmings.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite readers to join in the merriment and embrace the unexpected twists and turns that await in our exploration of the effervescent economics of holiday tree sales. So, grab a cup of cocoa, adjust your Santa hat, and let's unravel the captivating tale of economics teachers and their sapid impact on the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees in the US.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the surprisingly evergreen relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees, our research team embarked on a yuletide quest, employing a combination of statistical analysis and a sprinkle of holiday cheer. We gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, indulging in a merry forage across internet sources to pluck the ripest statistics from 2010 to 2018.

Our methodology began with a dendrological approach, cultivating a comprehensive dataset of the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This involved meticulous data wrangling and pruning to ensure that our statistical orchard was ripe for analysis.

To assess the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, we delved into a statistical thicket, employing Pearson's correlation coefficient to measure the degree of association. This allowed us to quantify the extent to which the number of economics educators in Idaho branches out to influence the whims of consumers in the artificial Christmas tree market.

In addition, we engaged in a robust time-series analysis to capture the seasonal fluctuations in both the academic landscape of economics educators and the festive realm of artificial tree sales. This enabled us to discern whether the influence of economics teachers waxes and wanes with the changing tides of the holiday season, akin to the ebb and flow of a yuletide tide.

Furthermore, to account for any lurking confounding variables that might be casting shadows over our results like a mischievous elf, we performed multiple regressions to untangle the interwoven strands of economic education and consumer behavior. This allowed us to extricate the independent impact of university economics teachers and determine whether their influence on artificial Christmas tree sales stood tall amidst the market forces swirling like snowflakes in a winter gale.

Lastly, in the spirit of academic merrymaking, we also conducted a series of robustness checks, ensuring that our findings were as sturdy as a well-constructed gingerbread house. This involved sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping techniques to fortify the credibility of our results and fend off any statistical humbugs that might have sought to dampen the festive spirit of our coniferous exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2010 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8079661, r-squared of 0.6528092, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US" is a study that ventures into the verdant and often overlooked terrain of the Christmas tree market to explore the relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This research is a jolly effort to unearth the roots of consumer behavior during the festive season, with a whimsical quest to find out if economics educators have been playing a part in sprucing up the holiday market.
From an empirical standpoint, the combination of university economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales seems as improbable as finding a squirrel nestled within the branches. However, the goal of this study is to branch out and investigate this unlikely correlation, bringing a novel perspective to the field of economics and enlivening the discussion with a touch of holiday cheer.
The coniferous connection we are about to explore is not merely a flimsy twig in the vast forest of economic research; rather, it represents a unique opportunity to dig deep into the soil of consumer decision-making and uncover the hidden roots of economic influence on holiday purchases. By blending statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, this research seeks to spark curiosity and celebrate the festive spirit of inquiry in a field not typically associated with tinsel and trimmings.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite readers to join in the merriment and embrace the unexpected twists and turns that await in our exploration of the effervescent economics of holiday tree sales. So, grab a cup of cocoa, adjust your Santa hat, and let's unravel the captivating tale of economics teachers and their sapid impact on the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees in the US.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees from 2010 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that the presence of economics teachers may indeed have a considerable impact on the demand for artificial foliage during the festive season. It appears that the influence of these educators extends beyond the classroom and ventures into the jolly realm of holiday consumerism.

The r-squared value of 0.6528092 signifies that approximately 65.28% of the variation in artificial Christmas tree sales can be explained by the variation in the number of university economics teachers. This finding highlights the substantial explanatory power of our coniferous equation, showing that the presence of economics educators contributes significantly to the merry fluctuations in holiday tree purchases.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the correlation we observed between economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales is indeed statistically significant. In other words, the probability of obtaining such a strong relationship by chance alone is lower than a snowball's chance in the hot desert sun.

Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, which showcases a merry and bright scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the number of university economics teachers and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this festive visual encapsulates the strong and lively connection we uncovered in our analysis.

In conclusion, our research illuminates a novel intertwining of economic education and holiday consumer behavior, offering a unique perspective on the influence of economics teachers in shaping the market for artificial Christmas trees. This unexpected linkage adds a touch of mirth and whimsy to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unassuming variables can sprout into a forest of significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The burgeoning field of research on the interplay between university economics teachers and consumer behavior during the festive season has elicited scholarly inquiry, albeit in a somewhat unexpected manner. Smith et al., in their seminal work "Economic Educators and Yuletide Yields," delved into the whimsical landscape of holiday market dynamics and hinted at the potential influence of economic education on purchasing decisions related to festive decorations. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in their treatise "The Economic Roots of Christmas Cheer," hinted at the arboreal implications of economic pedagogy as they pertain to the sales of artificial conifers during the holiday season.
Moving beyond the academic purview, real-world literature has also offered glimpses into the enigmatic relationship between economic education and holiday consumerism. "Economic Theory and Christmas Trees: A Case Study in Unexpected Connections" by Greenbaum captures the essence of this improbable association, weaving a narrative that introduces the concept of fiscal literacy seeping into the realms of tinsel and baubles. Furthermore, "Money, Mistletoe, and Market Forces" by Redmond et al. takes a candid look at the influence of economic theories on the sale and distribution of holiday trinkets and decorations, providing insightful parallels to the nuanced impact of economic educators on seasonal market trends.
Building upon this foundation, fictional works such as “The Merchant of Christmas: A Tale of Seasonal Supply and Demand” by Austen and “The Economic Enigma of Evergreen Exchanges” by Dickens offer hypothetical musings on the intertwining of economic principles and the holiday commerce landscape. While their narratives do not offer empirical evidence, these literary diversions serve as delightful ponderings on the potential sway of economic teachings on the market for artificial Christmas trees.
Fascinatingly, there are indirect connections present in popular board games as well. The game "Stocks and Spruces" mirrors real-world economic principles, weaving in the vibrant display of miniature Christmas trees as a form of investment, hinting at the multifaceted entanglement of economic teachings and festive décor.
In sum, the literature reveals a lighthearted but thought-provoking tapestry of academic and fanciful works that ponder the curious nexus between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. While the seed of this connection may have appeared unlikely, the interdisciplinary exploration it has inspired stands as a testament to the enduring whimsy and wonder of the academic enterprise.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees from 2010 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that the presence of economics teachers may indeed have a considerable impact on the demand for artificial foliage during the festive season. It appears that the influence of these educators extends beyond the classroom and ventures into the jolly realm of holiday consumerism.
The r-squared value of 0.6528092 signifies that approximately 65.28% of the variation in artificial Christmas tree sales can be explained by the variation in the number of university economics teachers. This finding highlights the substantial explanatory power of our coniferous equation, showing that the presence of economics educators contributes significantly to the merry fluctuations in holiday tree purchases.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the correlation we observed between economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales is indeed statistically significant. In other words, the probability of obtaining such a strong relationship by chance alone is lower than a snowball's chance in the hot desert sun.
Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, which showcases a merry and bright scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the number of university economics teachers and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this festive visual encapsulates the strong and lively connection we uncovered in our analysis.
In conclusion, our research illuminates a novel intertwining of economic education and holiday consumer behavior, offering a unique perspective on the influence of economics teachers in shaping the market for artificial Christmas trees. This unexpected linkage adds a touch of mirth and whimsy to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unassuming variables can sprout into a forest of significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results provide compelling evidence of a tangible association between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value offer a firm basis for asserting that the presence of economics educators plays a pivotal role in influencing consumer behavior during the holiday season. Our findings align with prior research, which, while initially perceived as whimsical, has now taken root in the fertile soil of empirical validation.

The connection between economic education and the demand for artificial conifers is not a mere flight of fancy, as the literature review playfully suggested. Rather, it reflects a nuanced interplay between academic influence and market dynamics. Smith et al.'s work, "Economic Educators and Yuletide Yields," implied a potential impact of economic education on holiday purchases, and our findings lend empirical support to this whimsical notion. Similarly, the literary diversions of Austen and Dickens, while fanciful in nature, provide entertaining musings that are surprisingly echoed in our robust correlation results.

Moreover, our findings resonate with the unexpected real-world literature on this topic. Greenbaum's "Economic Theory and Christmas Trees" and Redmond et al.'s "Money, Mistletoe, and Market Forces" highlighted the potential influence of economic principles on holiday trinket sales. Our study bridges the gap between these speculative insights and empirical evidence, affirming that economic educators have indeed sown the seeds for a substantial impact on the market for artificial Christmas trees.

The significant explanatory power of the number of university economics teachers in Idaho on US sales of artificial Christmas trees underscores the tangible influence of economic pedagogy. While it may seem far-fetched to link a pedagogical force to the holiday market, our results emphatically reinforce the lively association between the two seemingly disparate realms. The voluminous r-squared value further cements the substantial contribution of economic educators to the variance in artificial tree sales, demonstrating that their influence encompasses more than just the balance sheets and elasticities students grapple with in their classrooms.

In essence, our study not only confirms but also takes a "fir"m stance on the unexpected yet palpable link between economics education and the annual surge in artificial Christmas tree sales. It adds weight to the contention that economics teachers may indeed be subtly shaping the landscape of festive commerce. With our findings, we extend the branch of economic influence to the tinsel-draped realm of holiday decorations, inviting scholars to continue exploring the unanticipated avenues through which academic disciplines intertwine with consumer behavior.

Our research stands as a testament to the ability of academic inquiry to unearth surprising connections, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can yield significant insights. It highlights the enduring whimsy and wonder of scholarly exploration and, quite fittingly, branches out into new territory within the discipline of economics. The undeniable correlation between the number of university economics teachers and US sales of artificial Christmas trees casts a jovial light on the impact of economic education, showcasing how even the most unassuming variables can sprout into a veritable forest of significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US" is a study that ventures into the verdant and often overlooked terrain of the Christmas tree market to explore the relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. This research is a jolly effort to unearth the roots of consumer behavior during the festive season, with a whimsical quest to find out if economics educators have been playing a part in sprucing up the holiday market.
From an empirical standpoint, the combination of university economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales seems as improbable as finding a squirrel nestled within the branches. However, the goal of this study is to branch out and investigate this unlikely correlation, bringing a novel perspective to the field of economics and enlivening the discussion with a touch of holiday cheer.
The coniferous connection we are about to explore is not merely a flimsy twig in the vast forest of economic research; rather, it represents a unique opportunity to dig deep into the soil of consumer decision-making and uncover the hidden roots of economic influence on holiday purchases. By blending statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, this research seeks to spark curiosity and celebrate the festive spirit of inquiry in a field not typically associated with tinsel and trimmings.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite readers to join in the merriment and embrace the unexpected twists and turns that await in our exploration of the effervescent economics of holiday tree sales. So, grab a cup of cocoa, adjust your Santa hat, and let's unravel the captivating tale of economics teachers and their sapid impact on the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees in the US.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a remarkably robust correlation between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees from 2010 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that the presence of economics teachers may indeed have a considerable impact on the demand for artificial foliage during the festive season. It appears that the influence of these educators extends beyond the classroom and ventures into the jolly realm of holiday consumerism.
The r-squared value of 0.6528092 signifies that approximately 65.28% of the variation in artificial Christmas tree sales can be explained by the variation in the number of university economics teachers. This finding highlights the substantial explanatory power of our coniferous equation, showing that the presence of economics educators contributes significantly to the merry fluctuations in holiday tree purchases.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the correlation we observed between economics teachers and artificial Christmas tree sales is indeed statistically significant. In other words, the probability of obtaining such a strong relationship by chance alone is lower than a snowball's chance in the hot desert sun.
Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, which showcases a merry and bright scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the number of university economics teachers and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this festive visual encapsulates the strong and lively connection we uncovered in our analysis.
In conclusion, our research illuminates a novel intertwining of economic education and holiday consumer behavior, offering a unique perspective on the influence of economics teachers in shaping the market for artificial Christmas trees. This unexpected linkage adds a touch of mirth and whimsy to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unassuming variables can sprout into a forest of significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In sprucing up the traditional trunk of economic research, our study has unearthed a coniferous conundrum – the thriving relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. As our findings have decked the halls of statistical significance, it is evident that these educators have played a significant role in shaping the boughs of holiday consumerism.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 makes it clearer than the star atop a Christmas tree that the presence of economics teachers has a fir-m grip on artificial foliage sales. In fact, it seems they've been tree-ting consumer behavior like economics students – always finding the root cause of market trends.

Our research has highlighted that approximately 65.28% of the variation in artificial Christmas tree sales can be explained by the variation in the number of university economics teachers. It's as if these educators have been branching out into the holiday market, leaving an indelible mark on the merry fluctuations in tree purchases.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further validates that the correlation we observed is not just a fluke of statistical happenstance. It's as rare as a unicorn sighting at a Christmas parade.

In summary, our study brings to light the unexpected interplay between economics education and the evergreen market of artificial Christmas trees, showcasing how even the most unlikely variables can come together like ornaments on a tree. It's a merry reminder that in the forest of economics, the most unassuming twigs can grow into significant branches.

In the coniferous landscape of economic research, this study has added a touch of holiday cheer, demonstrating that the influence of economics teachers may be evergreen in shaping consumer behavior during the festive season. As we close the pages of this chapter, it's clear that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already lit up the statistical Christmas tree in this field!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Economic Arboretum Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Arboreal Economics and Yuletide Traditions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Branching Out: The Influentree of University Economics Teachers on Artificial Christmas Tree Sales in the US with an abstract of This study spruces up the field of economics by examining the unlikely relationship between the number of university economics teachers in Idaho and US sales of artificial Christmas trees. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to assess this coniferous connection, and our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8079661 with p < 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2018. Our research sheds light on the budding influence of economic education on consumer behavior during the holiday season, suggesting that perhaps economics teachers have been pining for a new way to impact the market. This research adds a refreshing twist to the field of economics, demonstrating that even the most unconventional associations can be evergreen in their significance.

ChatGPT:

university economics teachers, artificial Christmas tree sales, US consumer behavior, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statista, correlation coefficient, economics education, holiday season, market influence

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university economics teachers in Idaho
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of economics teachers, postsecondary in Idaho
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university economics teachers in Idaho

US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees
Detailed data title: Christmas Trees (Fake Trees) Sold in the US
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees

Correlation r = 0.8079661 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6528092 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university economics teachers in Idaho) over the 9 years from 2010 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0084. 0.0084210474839278950000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.84% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 119 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.31, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of university economics teachers in Idaho (Laborers)306060504040120100100
US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees (Trees Sold)8.29.510.914.713.912.518.621.123.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,60,60,50,40,40,120,100,100,])
array_2 = np.array([8.2,9.5,10.9,14.7,13.9,12.5,18.6,21.1,23.6,])
array_1_name = "The number of university economics teachers in Idaho"
array_2_name = "US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3342 · Black Variable ID: 18004 · Red Variable ID: 481
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0