Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the demand for eyeglasses in New Hampshire surged, so did the need for lenses. This led to a boom in the global petroleum industry, including the Solomon Islands, where the sudden call for tiny lens adjustments somehow revved up their petrol consumption. It's a spectacle how this ocular occupation in the US ended up fueling the remote island nation's gas usage!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A Polaroid photo] In a bustling city in New Hampshire, ophthalmic laboratory technicians are diligently crafting stylish glasses. The scene is filled with vibrant colors, with workers blending traditional craftsmanship and modern designs. In the background, a diverse group of people can be seen donning a variety of stunning eyewear, each adding a unique touch to their individual styles. Across the ocean, the serene islands of Solomon Islands contrast the city scene, depicting the rising number of shipping vessels and vehicles, alluding to the increase in petrol consumption. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Magic realism 3D Pixar Style a Polaroid photo inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands, in the following situation: Because as ophthalmic lab techs in New Hampshire increase, more people wear glasses, creating an international fad. This leads to increased shipping, causing more vehicle use and petrol consumption in the Solomon Islands.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in New Hampshire, a growing number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians work diligently to craft a multitude of glasses. As their numbers increase, more and more people don stylish eyewear, creating a trend that spreads globally. Across the ocean, on the serene islands of Solomon Islands, the rise in shipping vessels and vehicles can be seen, leading to a noticeable increase in petrol consumption.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in New Hampshire, a growing number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians work diligently to craft a multitude of glasses. As their numbers increase, more and more people don stylish eyewear, creating a trend that spreads globally. Across the ocean, on the serene islands of Solomon Islands, the rise in shipping vessels and vehicles can be seen, leading to a noticeable increase in petrol consumption. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A Polaroid photo] In a bustling city in New Hampshire, ophthalmic laboratory technicians are diligently crafting stylish glasses. The scene is filled with vibrant colors, with workers blending traditional craftsmanship and modern designs. In the background, a diverse group of people can be seen donning a variety of stunning eyewear, each adding a unique touch to their individual styles. Across the ocean, the serene islands of Solomon Islands contrast the city scene, depicting the rising number of shipping vessels and vehicles, alluding to the increase in petrol consumption.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire caused Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands to increase.
AI academic paper
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands Journal of Comedic Cross-Cultural Research Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7612256 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Seeing is believing," they say. But what if seeing is also correlated with petroleum consumption? That's the question we set out to answer in this study, delving into the curious relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil" - an unexpected pairing that tickles both the funny bone and the intellect.
As researchers, we are accustomed to seeking correlations and making sense of data, but this particular investigation had us rubbing our eyes in disbelief. And speaking of eyes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Our work may not involve physical risk, but it certainly has its fair share of eye-opening discoveries.
Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2021. We were determined to shed light on the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's no wonder we frequently found ourselves exclaiming, "I can't believe my corneas!"
The findings of our investigation turned out to be as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. It's like watching droplets of oil through a microscope - the connection was right there, larger than life. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land.
Our team couldn't resist reveling in the "punny" aspects of our findings. It's not every day that one gets to humorously discuss the correlation between an optical profession and a fossil fuel. But as in all good research, the real beauty lies in the illumination of unexpected connections and the expansion of knowledge. So, get ready to have your "pupils" dilated with wonder at the results of our "eye"-opening investigation!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Seeing is believing," they say. But what if seeing is also correlated with petroleum consumption? That's the question we set out to answer in this study, delving into the curious relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil" - an unexpected pairing that tickles both the funny bone and the intellect.
As researchers, we are accustomed to seeking correlations and making sense of data, but this particular investigation had us rubbing our eyes in disbelief. And speaking of eyes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Our work may not involve physical risk, but it certainly has its fair share of eye-opening discoveries.
Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2021. We were determined to shed light on the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's no wonder we frequently found ourselves exclaiming, "I can't believe my corneas!"
The findings of our investigation turned out to be as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. It's like watching droplets of oil through a microscope - the connection was right there, larger than life. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land.
Our team couldn't resist reveling in the "punny" aspects of our findings. It's not every day that one gets to humorously discuss the correlation between an optical profession and a fossil fuel. But as in all good research, the real beauty lies in the illumination of unexpected connections and the expansion of knowledge. So, get ready to have your "pupils" dilated with wonder at the results of our "eye"-opening investigation!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and colleagues (2015) examined the impact of ophthalmic laboratory technicians on local economies, with a focus on workforce trends and healthcare access. Meanwhile, Doe et al. (2018) explored the intricate web of factors influencing petroleum consumption in small island nations. The intersection of these two disparate lines of research may seem like a real eye-opener, but it's all just a matter of focus.
Speaking of focus, did you hear about the optometrist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Now, back to the serious matter at hand. As we delve into the literature, it becomes evident that the connection between these two variables is as clear as the vision of someone wearing a freshly prescribed pair of glasses.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, "The Optician's Manual" by Jones (2019) offers an in-depth exploration of eyecare professions, while "Petroleum Economics" by Brown (2017) dissects the complexities of oil consumption and trade. These works provide valuable context for understanding our seemingly improbable correlation. It's like seeing clearly through a pair of oil-stained goggles – unexpected, but undeniably present.
Lest we forget the hypothetical realm, works of fiction such as "The Eye of the World" by Robert Jordan and "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair surprisingly touch upon themes that can be tangentially related to our research. Who would have thought that an epic fantasy novel and a historical fiction about the oil industry would find themselves in the same sentence? It's almost as incongruous as our research topic!
As we dig deeper into the sea of knowledge, it's important to note that our literature review didn't stop at traditional academic sources. No, we went above and beyond, scouring the most unexpected corners for insights. This included perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in an attempt to glean wisdom from the most unexpected of places. A real eye-opener, wouldn't you say?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Seeing is believing," they say. But what if seeing is also correlated with petroleum consumption? That's the question we set out to answer in this study, delving into the curious relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil" - an unexpected pairing that tickles both the funny bone and the intellect.
As researchers, we are accustomed to seeking correlations and making sense of data, but this particular investigation had us rubbing our eyes in disbelief. And speaking of eyes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Our work may not involve physical risk, but it certainly has its fair share of eye-opening discoveries.
Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2021. We were determined to shed light on the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's no wonder we frequently found ourselves exclaiming, "I can't believe my corneas!"
The findings of our investigation turned out to be as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. It's like watching droplets of oil through a microscope - the connection was right there, larger than life. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land.
Our team couldn't resist reveling in the "punny" aspects of our findings. It's not every day that one gets to humorously discuss the correlation between an optical profession and a fossil fuel. But as in all good research, the real beauty lies in the illumination of unexpected connections and the expansion of knowledge. So, get ready to have your "pupils" dilated with wonder at the results of our "eye"-opening investigation!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To uncover the mysteriously intertwined relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands, our research team embarked on a scientific journey that was both enlightening and entertaining. Picture a team of intrepid explorers venturing into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis with the zeal of Indiana Jones - if he were armed with spreadsheets instead of a bullwhip.
First, our team scoured the digital realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, extracting data from 2003 to 2021 with the precision of a well-calibrated refractometer. The hunt for relevant information required us to don our metaphorical lab coats and magnifying glasses, combing through mounds of data with the tenacity of Sherlock Holmes hot on the trail of a cryptic correlation.
After collecting the necessary data, we utilized advanced statistical methods that would impress even the most seasoned number-crunchers. Our analyses included intricate regression models, time series analyses, and trend assessments. It was a bit like performing a high-stakes magic trick - except instead of pulling a rabbit out of a hat, we were conjuring meaningful conclusions from a sea of numbers.
With the statistical tools humming like a well-oiled machine, we meticulously examined the relationship between the abundance of ophthalmic laboratory technicians and the petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. We performed multivariate analyses to discern the magnitude of the connection and employed sensitivity analyses to ensure that our findings were as robust as, well, a pair of polarized sunglasses.
Speaking of polarized sunglasses, did you hear about the physicist who fell in love with a spectrometer? It was an optical attraction! But I digress. Back to our research methods.
Our team painstakingly verified the reliability and accuracy of the data, confirming that the numbers were as true and dependable as a compass in the hands of a seasoned explorer. We employed rigorous validation procedures to ensure that our findings would stand up to the scrutiny of the harshest scientific gaze.
Once we had fully immersed ourselves in the data and teased out all the pertinent relationships, it was time to employ detailed graphical representations to visually convey our findings. We designed colorful charts and graphs that would make even a statistician do a double take with admiration.
Finally, after traversing the convoluted paths of statistical analysis and data interpretation, we arrived at the crystal-clear results that illuminated the hitherto murky connection between ophthalmic practices in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. Our methodology unveiled an unexpected link that is sure to leave even the most discerning scholars chuckling in surprise.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7612256, r-squared of 0.5794644, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Seeing is believing," they say. But what if seeing is also correlated with petroleum consumption? That's the question we set out to answer in this study, delving into the curious relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil" - an unexpected pairing that tickles both the funny bone and the intellect.
As researchers, we are accustomed to seeking correlations and making sense of data, but this particular investigation had us rubbing our eyes in disbelief. And speaking of eyes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Our work may not involve physical risk, but it certainly has its fair share of eye-opening discoveries.
Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2021. We were determined to shed light on the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's no wonder we frequently found ourselves exclaiming, "I can't believe my corneas!"
The findings of our investigation turned out to be as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. It's like watching droplets of oil through a microscope - the connection was right there, larger than life. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land.
Our team couldn't resist reveling in the "punny" aspects of our findings. It's not every day that one gets to humorously discuss the correlation between an optical profession and a fossil fuel. But as in all good research, the real beauty lies in the illumination of unexpected connections and the expansion of knowledge. So, get ready to have your "pupils" dilated with wonder at the results of our "eye"-opening investigation!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have shed light on a rather unexpected correlation between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. The correlation coefficient of 0.7612256 suggests a quite strong relationship, leaving us "eye-rolling" in amazement at the unexpected connection.
Our findings revealed an r-squared value of 0.5794644, indicating that approximately 58% of the variation in petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands can be explained by the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire. It's like solving a complex puzzle – we didn't see it coming, but the pieces fit together like a matching pair of contact lenses!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving our team "pupils" dilated with wonder at the surprising results. It's a case of "seeing is believing" - or in this instance, "seeing is correlating"! Who would've thought that the "eyedea" of investigating these two variables would lead to such an unexpected finding?
As promised, the correlation comes to life in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians and petroleum consumption. It's as clear as a well-focused camera lens – the data points align like a pair of perfectly synced binoculars, offering a visual representation of the "eye"-opening connection we've uncovered.
In conclusion, our research not only provides a thought-provoking perspective on unlikely correlations but also introduces a touch of humor to the world of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that exploring the link between eye care and petroleum usage would turn out to be such an "eye"-citing journey?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and colleagues (2015) examined the impact of ophthalmic laboratory technicians on local economies, with a focus on workforce trends and healthcare access. Meanwhile, Doe et al. (2018) explored the intricate web of factors influencing petroleum consumption in small island nations. The intersection of these two disparate lines of research may seem like a real eye-opener, but it's all just a matter of focus.
Speaking of focus, did you hear about the optometrist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Now, back to the serious matter at hand. As we delve into the literature, it becomes evident that the connection between these two variables is as clear as the vision of someone wearing a freshly prescribed pair of glasses.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, "The Optician's Manual" by Jones (2019) offers an in-depth exploration of eyecare professions, while "Petroleum Economics" by Brown (2017) dissects the complexities of oil consumption and trade. These works provide valuable context for understanding our seemingly improbable correlation. It's like seeing clearly through a pair of oil-stained goggles – unexpected, but undeniably present.
Lest we forget the hypothetical realm, works of fiction such as "The Eye of the World" by Robert Jordan and "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair surprisingly touch upon themes that can be tangentially related to our research. Who would have thought that an epic fantasy novel and a historical fiction about the oil industry would find themselves in the same sentence? It's almost as incongruous as our research topic!
As we dig deeper into the sea of knowledge, it's important to note that our literature review didn't stop at traditional academic sources. No, we went above and beyond, scouring the most unexpected corners for insights. This included perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in an attempt to glean wisdom from the most unexpected of places. A real eye-opener, wouldn't you say?
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have shed light on a rather unexpected correlation between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. The correlation coefficient of 0.7612256 suggests a quite strong relationship, leaving us "eye-rolling" in amazement at the unexpected connection.
Our findings revealed an r-squared value of 0.5794644, indicating that approximately 58% of the variation in petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands can be explained by the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire. It's like solving a complex puzzle – we didn't see it coming, but the pieces fit together like a matching pair of contact lenses!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving our team "pupils" dilated with wonder at the surprising results. It's a case of "seeing is believing" - or in this instance, "seeing is correlating"! Who would've thought that the "eyedea" of investigating these two variables would lead to such an unexpected finding?
As promised, the correlation comes to life in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians and petroleum consumption. It's as clear as a well-focused camera lens – the data points align like a pair of perfectly synced binoculars, offering a visual representation of the "eye"-opening connection we've uncovered.
In conclusion, our research not only provides a thought-provoking perspective on unlikely correlations but also introduces a touch of humor to the world of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that exploring the link between eye care and petroleum usage would turn out to be such an "eye"-citing journey?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have indeed opened our eyes to the surprising correlation between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's as if the eyepiece of statistical analysis revealed a clear picture of this unexpected relationship, and it's a sight to behold – a bit like that feeling when you finally find the perfect pair of glasses after trying on countless frames!
In line with the work of Smith and colleagues (2015) and Doe et al. (2018), our results build upon prior research that hinted at the potential influence of local workforce trends on broader economic indicators. As "clear-eyed" researchers, we can now confidently say that our findings not only support, but also "lens" credence to the notion that seemingly disparate variables can indeed be connected in an unforeseen manner. Who would have thought that the "eye"-catching relationship between eye care and oil consumption would emerge as a significant correlation, much like finding a needle in a haystack… or a contact lens in an optometrist's office?
The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7612256 and the remarkable r-squared value of 0.5794644 underscore the compelling nature of this connection. It's like stumbling upon a treasure trove of data that makes the "eye"-popping link between these variables as crystal clear as a perfectly polished lens. And with a p-value of less than 0.01, we're left "dilated" with wonder at the unanticipated strength of this statistical relationship.
Just as we predicted, our analysis supports the surprising intersection of these unlikely variables, "illuminating" the idea that the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands are more closely related than meets the eye. It's like finding a cleverly disguised pun in the midst of a serious academic discussion – unexpected, yet undeniably present and "pun-believably" fitting.
In essence, our research has brought to light an unexpected connection that may seem as unlikely as a "punny" dad joke, yet it has the potential to "re-"focus future studies on the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our results not only provide an "eye"-opening perspective on cross-disciplinary correlations but also add a touch of humor to the traditionally serious world of scientific inquiry.
As we continue to "eye"-dentify and explore such unforeseen relationships, it's vital to remember that science often delights in revealing marvels that are as surprising as they are informative. After all, who doesn't enjoy a good scientific inquiry that combines insight and a dash of unexpected wit? It's akin to finding the perfect balance of precision and amusement in the world of research – a bit like achieving the perfect juxtaposition of hypotheses and humor!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Seeing is believing," they say. But what if seeing is also correlated with petroleum consumption? That's the question we set out to answer in this study, delving into the curious relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil" - an unexpected pairing that tickles both the funny bone and the intellect.
As researchers, we are accustomed to seeking correlations and making sense of data, but this particular investigation had us rubbing our eyes in disbelief. And speaking of eyes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who fell into the lens grinder? He made a spectacle of himself! Our work may not involve physical risk, but it certainly has its fair share of eye-opening discoveries.
Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2003 to 2021. We were determined to shed light on the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's no wonder we frequently found ourselves exclaiming, "I can't believe my corneas!"
The findings of our investigation turned out to be as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. It's like watching droplets of oil through a microscope - the connection was right there, larger than life. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land.
Our team couldn't resist reveling in the "punny" aspects of our findings. It's not every day that one gets to humorously discuss the correlation between an optical profession and a fossil fuel. But as in all good research, the real beauty lies in the illumination of unexpected connections and the expansion of knowledge. So, get ready to have your "pupils" dilated with wonder at the results of our "eye"-opening investigation!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have shed light on a rather unexpected correlation between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. The correlation coefficient of 0.7612256 suggests a quite strong relationship, leaving us "eye-rolling" in amazement at the unexpected connection.
Our findings revealed an r-squared value of 0.5794644, indicating that approximately 58% of the variation in petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands can be explained by the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire. It's like solving a complex puzzle – we didn't see it coming, but the pieces fit together like a matching pair of contact lenses!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving our team "pupils" dilated with wonder at the surprising results. It's a case of "seeing is believing" - or in this instance, "seeing is correlating"! Who would've thought that the "eyedea" of investigating these two variables would lead to such an unexpected finding?
As promised, the correlation comes to life in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians and petroleum consumption. It's as clear as a well-focused camera lens – the data points align like a pair of perfectly synced binoculars, offering a visual representation of the "eye"-opening connection we've uncovered.
In conclusion, our research not only provides a thought-provoking perspective on unlikely correlations but also introduces a touch of humor to the world of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that exploring the link between eye care and petroleum usage would turn out to be such an "eye"-citing journey?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our "eye"-opening investigation into the correlation between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands has provided both enlightening and entertaining results. The strength of the correlation coefficient (0.7612256) suggests a clear and unexpectedly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if our study found the perfect pair of glasses for these two variables – a spectacle, indeed!
Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.5794644, explaining approximately 58% of the variation in petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands based on the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire. It's like a statistical magic trick - we pulled the correlation out of a research hat, leaving onlookers "mind-blown" with the unexpected revelation.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 supported the statistical significance of our findings, leaving us "pupils" dilated with wonder at the surprising results. It's a classic case where "seeing is correlating," and the data certainly didn't "blink" in demonstrating the connection between these variables. It just goes to show, you never know what you might find when you "focus" on unexpected relationships!
We've illustrated this unexpected connection with a creative scatterplot in Fig. 1, providing a visual representation that's as clear as a crisp contact lens. Through this visual aid, our research has truly magnified the "eye"-opening relationship between ophthalmic professionals and petroleum usage, leaving readers "seeing" the connection crystal clear.
With these amusing and revealing findings, it seems our "punny" investigation has added a touch of humor to the world of scientific inquiry. Much like a good dad joke, our results are both entertaining and enlightening. And speaking of dad jokes, did you hear about the ophthalmologist who told everyone to stop making eye puns? He said they were cornea! But in all seriousness, our study stands as a testament to the unexpected marvels of research.
Ultimately, we assert that no further investigation is needed in this area – it's clear that our study has provided a solid foundation for understanding this surprising correlation, leaving no "iris" for doubt.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Comedic Cross-Cultural Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Transnational Ocular Sustainability
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands with an abstract of This study delves into the enigmatic relationship between the number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire and petroleum consumption in the Solomon Islands. It's a classic case of "eye" for an "oil"! Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2003 to 2021. The findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7612256, and with a p-value of less than 0.01. To put it simply, it seems that the abundance of eye care specialists in one location is indeed linked to the petroleum usage in a far-off land. The results of our "eye"-opening investigation shed light on a curious connection that will surely leave you "pupils" dilated with wonder.
ChatGPT:
ophthalmic laboratory technicians, New Hampshire, petroleum consumption, Solomon Islands, correlation, eye care specialists, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, research findings
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New HampshireDetailed data title: BLS estimate of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire
Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Solomon Islands in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5794644 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 57.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00015. 0.0001533834183556206200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.76 in 0.015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,520 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.47, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire (Laborers) | 100 | 70 | 190 | 220 | 150 | 190 | 200 | 190 | 270 | 290 | 280 | 190 | 170 | 110 | 80 | 130 | 100 | 200 | 180 |
Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands (Million Barrels/Day) | 1.94609 | 2.0691 | 2.12109 | 2.19687 | 2.33876 | 2.37205 | 2.45252 | 2.53234 | 2.61892 | 2.62645 | 2.62113 | 2.46699 | 2.24824 | 2.13932 | 2.15072 | 2.2557 | 2.22171 | 2.10555 | 2.17425 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([100,70,190,220,150,190,200,190,270,290,280,190,170,110,80,130,100,200,180,])
array_2 = np.array([1.94609,2.0691,2.12109,2.19687,2.33876,2.37205,2.45252,2.53234,2.61892,2.62645,2.62113,2.46699,2.24824,2.13932,2.15072,2.2557,2.22171,2.10555,2.17425,])
array_1_name = "The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of ophthalmic laboratory technicians in New Hampshire
- Line chart for only Petroluem consumption in Solomon Islands
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Seeing Clearly: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians in New Hampshire and Petroleum Consumption in the Solomon Islands
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 3335 · Black Variable ID: 11487 · Red Variable ID: 24911