about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,294 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Corbin and the second variable is The number of gas plant operators in Michigan.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more and more babies were named Corbin, their collective energy and enthusiasm unknowingly revved up the state's interest in all things gas-related, leading to a surge in the number of gas plant operators in Michigan. It seems the correlation was not just hot air after all!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Data cyber art ] Prompt: Create an image that captures the scene of a bustling Michigan town where a group of children play in a park. In the forefront, several boys named Corbin are enthusiastically climbing a metal jungle gym, radiating joy and energy. In the background, a cluster of large gas plants stands tall, with operators working diligently. It is evident that the popularity of the name Corbin has inspired some of the operators, who grew up watching the TV show "L.A. Law" and are fond of the character portrayed by actor Corbin Bernsen, to pursue careers in the gas industry. The image should reflect the vibrant activity of the children, the industrial presence of the gas plants, and the sense of community and inspiration intertwined within the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Data cyber art a meme Macabre
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan, in the following situation: As the name Corbin gained popularity, more parents named their children after the actor Corbin Bernsen. This led to a generation of Michiganders inspired to work in the gas industry after watching him portray a gas plant operator in the hit TV show "L.A. Law.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Michigan town, a group of children play in a park. Among them, several boys named Corbin enthusiastically climb a metal jungle gym. In the distance, a cluster of large gas plants stand tall, their operators working diligently. It is evident that the popularity of the name Corbin has inspired some of the operators, having grown up watching the TV show "L.A. Law" and being fond of the character portrayed by actor Corbin Bernsen, to pursue careers in the gas industry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Michigan town, a group of children play in a park. Among them, several boys named Corbin enthusiastically climb a metal jungle gym. In the distance, a cluster of large gas plants stand tall, their operators working diligently. It is evident that the popularity of the name Corbin has inspired some of the operators, having grown up watching the TV show "L.A. Law" and being fond of the character portrayed by actor Corbin Bernsen, to pursue careers in the gas industry. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Data cyber art ] Prompt: Create an image that captures the scene of a bustling Michigan town where a group of children play in a park. In the forefront, several boys named Corbin are enthusiastically climbing a metal jungle gym, radiating joy and energy. In the background, a cluster of large gas plants stands tall, with operators working diligently. It is evident that the popularity of the name Corbin has inspired some of the operators, who grew up watching the TV show "L.A. Law" and are fond of the character portrayed by actor Corbin Bernsen, to pursue careers in the gas industry. The image should reflect the vibrant activity of the children, the industrial presence of the gas plants, and the sense of community and inspiration intertwined within the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Corbin positively influenced The number of gas plant operators in Michigan.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan

The Journal of Quirky Demographics and Industry Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The confluence of names and numbers, identities and occupations, has long been a subject of intrigue, albeit not one that typically garners the same amount of attention as more conventional research inquiries. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we find ourselves delving into the peculiar realm of nomenclature trends and their curious connection to the workforce within the energy sector. Specifically, we embark on a whimsical journey to examine the correlation - a correlation observed in this investigation and that doesn't leave us pass gas - between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the illustrious state of Michigan.

While some might dismiss such an undertaking as frivolous or quixotic, one cannot help but be drawn to the irresistible allure of uncovering correlations that seem to defy all logic and reason. It's always fascinating when statistical analysis, like a pair of worn-out lab goggles, brings into focus unexpected patterns and connections. Indeed, the correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 that emerged from our eminent data scrutiny practically leaped off the pages, demanding attention and ponderous contemplation.

The very notion that a seemingly inconsequential variable such as the popularity of a first name could be intertwined with the labor force in a specific industry gives us pause for wry mirth. Surely, we are not alone in experiencing a chuckle at the thought that a name like "Corbin" could hold sway over the occupational choices of individuals destined for the gas plant domain. Is it sheer coincidence, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we set out on this venture, we are primed to unearth such revelations and perhaps find ourselves gasping at the profundity of the underlying mechanisms that drive this seemingly fortuitous linkage.

With a nod to levity and an acknowledgement of the delightful peculiarity of our pursuits, this research sets out to not only unravel the statistical underpinnings of this correlation but also to infuse the exploration with a lightness of tone, acknowledging the inherent whimsy of its subject matter. After all, the world of research and scholarly inquiry need not be bereft of humor and the occasional pun. With this in mind, we embark on our intrepid journey to unravel the confounding connections between Corbins and carbons, all in the name of whimsical scholarship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of names and numbers, identities and occupations, has long been a subject of intrigue, albeit not one that typically garners the same amount of attention as more conventional research inquiries. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we find ourselves delving into the peculiar realm of nomenclature trends and their curious connection to the workforce within the energy sector. Specifically, we embark on a whimsical journey to examine the correlation - a correlation observed in this investigation and that doesn't leave us pass gas - between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the illustrious state of Michigan.
While some might dismiss such an undertaking as frivolous or quixotic, one cannot help but be drawn to the irresistible allure of uncovering correlations that seem to defy all logic and reason. It's always fascinating when statistical analysis, like a pair of worn-out lab goggles, brings into focus unexpected patterns and connections. Indeed, the correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 that emerged from our eminent data scrutiny practically leaped off the pages, demanding attention and ponderous contemplation.
The very notion that a seemingly inconsequential variable such as the popularity of a first name could be intertwined with the labor force in a specific industry gives us pause for wry mirth. Surely, we are not alone in experiencing a chuckle at the thought that a name like "Corbin" could hold sway over the occupational choices of individuals destined for the gas plant domain. Is it sheer coincidence, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we set out on this venture, we are primed to unearth such revelations and perhaps find ourselves gasping at the profundity of the underlying mechanisms that drive this seemingly fortuitous linkage.
With a nod to levity and an acknowledgement of the delightful peculiarity of our pursuits, this research sets out to not only unravel the statistical underpinnings of this correlation but also to infuse the exploration with a lightness of tone, acknowledging the inherent whimsy of its subject matter. After all, the world of research and scholarly inquiry need not be bereft of humor and the occasional pun. With this in mind, we embark on our intrepid journey to unravel the confounding connections between Corbins and carbons, all in the name of whimsical scholarship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The research on the connection between personal nomenclature and professional trajectory is a sparsely trodden pathway in the annals of academic inquiry. Smith (2015) explores the psychological implications of name popularity and occupational preferences in "Names and Numbers: A Psychological Analysis," shedding light on the subtle nuances that may shape an individual's career choices. Whereas Doe (2018) delves into the sociocultural aspects of naming trends and their potential impact on labor market dynamics in "The Sociology of Names and Occupations." These serious studies offer a foundation for our investigation into the link between the prevalence of the first name "Corbin" and the professional pursuits of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan.

At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss the correlation between name popularity and occupational demographics as mere happenstance. However, a closer examination of the literature reveals that seemingly whimsical connections often harbor surprising depth. Jones (2020) delves into the intricacies of improbable correlations in "Oddball Connections: Exploring the Unlikely Ties That Bind," underscoring the profound and often inexplicable interplay between seemingly unrelated variables.

Turning to non-fiction works that inform our approach, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a quirky exploration of unanticipated correlations and hidden patterns in human behavior, providing a framework for embracing the unexpected in our own analysis. In a similar vein, "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell prompts consideration of unconventional factors that may influence career paths and occupational choices.

Drawing inspiration from sources that might seem ostensibly unrelated but harbor hidden relevance, the board game "Scrabble" serves as an illustrative analogy for our endeavor. Just as seemingly disparate letters align to form meaningful words on the game board, we seek to uncover the underlying connections between the popularity of the name "Corbin" and the composition of Michigan's gas plant workforce, perhaps revealing a surprising narrative akin to a fortuitous word alignment in a game of lexical chance.

In a lighthearted departure from the rigid confines of conventional literature review, we turn our attention to fiction works with titles that, while unrelated on the surface, offer a whimsical echo of our quest. "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Power of One" by Bryce Courtenay beckon us into the realm of storytelling and serendipitous connections, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a dash of narrative intrigue.

As we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of literature and scholarly discourse, it becomes evident that even the most serious of pursuits can benefit from a touch of levity and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. With this perspective in mind, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic bond between the name "Corbin" and the domain of gas plant operations, blurring the line between scholarly inquiry and delightful speculation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of names and numbers, identities and occupations, has long been a subject of intrigue, albeit not one that typically garners the same amount of attention as more conventional research inquiries. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we find ourselves delving into the peculiar realm of nomenclature trends and their curious connection to the workforce within the energy sector. Specifically, we embark on a whimsical journey to examine the correlation - a correlation observed in this investigation and that doesn't leave us pass gas - between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the illustrious state of Michigan.
While some might dismiss such an undertaking as frivolous or quixotic, one cannot help but be drawn to the irresistible allure of uncovering correlations that seem to defy all logic and reason. It's always fascinating when statistical analysis, like a pair of worn-out lab goggles, brings into focus unexpected patterns and connections. Indeed, the correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 that emerged from our eminent data scrutiny practically leaped off the pages, demanding attention and ponderous contemplation.
The very notion that a seemingly inconsequential variable such as the popularity of a first name could be intertwined with the labor force in a specific industry gives us pause for wry mirth. Surely, we are not alone in experiencing a chuckle at the thought that a name like "Corbin" could hold sway over the occupational choices of individuals destined for the gas plant domain. Is it sheer coincidence, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we set out on this venture, we are primed to unearth such revelations and perhaps find ourselves gasping at the profundity of the underlying mechanisms that drive this seemingly fortuitous linkage.
With a nod to levity and an acknowledgement of the delightful peculiarity of our pursuits, this research sets out to not only unravel the statistical underpinnings of this correlation but also to infuse the exploration with a lightness of tone, acknowledging the inherent whimsy of its subject matter. After all, the world of research and scholarly inquiry need not be bereft of humor and the occasional pun. With this in mind, we embark on our intrepid journey to unravel the confounding connections between Corbins and carbons, all in the name of whimsical scholarship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In endeavoring to unravel the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan, a methodological approach both rigorous and, dare we say, whimsical was adopted. The primary data sources employed for this investigation were the records of the US Social Security Administration for tracking the prevalence of the name "Corbin" and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for enumerating the employment figures in the gas plant operation sector. The entire dataset spanned the years 2003 to 2020, casting a wide net to capture any nuanced shifts in nomenclature preferences and labor force dynamics.

To initiate this study, an initial prowl – or should we say troll – through the US Social Security Administration's archives was conducted to extract the frequencies of the name "Corbin" across the years under scrutiny. The meticulous mining of this data sought to establish a comprehensive profile of the name's popularity, delving into whether it waxed or waned over the designated period. Concurrently, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' compendium of occupational statistics was scoured – though, one might argue, not in a fashion befitting the "Grinch" – to capture the evolving headcounts of gas plant operators within the environs of Michigan. This comprehensive approach aimed to capture the nuances in employment patterns across the years, allowing for a comprehensive mapping of labor dynamics in relation to the moniker "Corbin."

The subsequent phase involved a rather less whimsical – and decidedly more rigorous – statistical analysis, leveraging the robust capabilities of correlation analysis to disentangle the interplay between "Corbins" and carbons, pun intended. A correlation coefficient was calculated with due deference to the statistical gods, yielding a numerical depiction of the strength and direction of the association between the two variables – the popularity of the name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Further, the venerable p-value was unveiled, providing vital insights into the statistical significance of this peculiar association.

In addition to the principal analyses, supplementary checks were performed to ascertain the robustness of our findings. This encompassed sensitivity analyses, control for potential confounders, and the exploration of alternative statistical techniques, all in the spirit of cowardly covering our bases and ensuring our results stood up to the scrutiny of scientific inquiry.

Finally, in a nod to the veritable mishmash of playfulness and academic rigor that characterizes this investigation, a qualitative exploration of potential underlying mechanisms and whimsical suppositions was marshaled. This segment sought to cheekily speculate on the curious nexus between nomenclature and labor choices and the whimsical world of data and wit.

With a blend of methodological exactitude and academic whimsy, this study endeavors to peer through the looking glass of numbers and nomenclature to shed light on the underlying relationship – a venture imbued with as much mirth as it is method.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8227755, r-squared of 0.6769596, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The confluence of names and numbers, identities and occupations, has long been a subject of intrigue, albeit not one that typically garners the same amount of attention as more conventional research inquiries. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we find ourselves delving into the peculiar realm of nomenclature trends and their curious connection to the workforce within the energy sector. Specifically, we embark on a whimsical journey to examine the correlation - a correlation observed in this investigation and that doesn't leave us pass gas - between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the illustrious state of Michigan.
While some might dismiss such an undertaking as frivolous or quixotic, one cannot help but be drawn to the irresistible allure of uncovering correlations that seem to defy all logic and reason. It's always fascinating when statistical analysis, like a pair of worn-out lab goggles, brings into focus unexpected patterns and connections. Indeed, the correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 that emerged from our eminent data scrutiny practically leaped off the pages, demanding attention and ponderous contemplation.
The very notion that a seemingly inconsequential variable such as the popularity of a first name could be intertwined with the labor force in a specific industry gives us pause for wry mirth. Surely, we are not alone in experiencing a chuckle at the thought that a name like "Corbin" could hold sway over the occupational choices of individuals destined for the gas plant domain. Is it sheer coincidence, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we set out on this venture, we are primed to unearth such revelations and perhaps find ourselves gasping at the profundity of the underlying mechanisms that drive this seemingly fortuitous linkage.
With a nod to levity and an acknowledgement of the delightful peculiarity of our pursuits, this research sets out to not only unravel the statistical underpinnings of this correlation but also to infuse the exploration with a lightness of tone, acknowledging the inherent whimsy of its subject matter. After all, the world of research and scholarly inquiry need not be bereft of humor and the occasional pun. With this in mind, we embark on our intrepid journey to unravel the confounding connections between Corbins and carbons, all in the name of whimsical scholarship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan from 2003 to 2020. A correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 was observed, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) also substantiated this association, with a value of 0.6769596, suggesting that approximately 67.7% of the variation in the number of gas plant operators can be explained by the popularity of the name "Corbin."

In addition, the statistical analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the significance of this correlation and providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Fig. 1 visually depicts the compelling correlation between the frequency of the name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan, with a scatterplot showcasing the notable clustering of data points.

The strength of this correlation prompts contemplation of the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to this curious association. While our findings shed light on this unexpected relationship between nomenclature trends and occupational choices, they also underscore the need for further exploration and inquiry into the quirky interplay between names and numbers in the context of the energy sector.

The whimsical nature of this correlation impels us to acknowledge the humorous and light-hearted aspect of our scholarly endeavors, as we delve into the realm of monikers and manpower, aiming to uncover the playful intersection of Corbins and carbons in the energy landscape of Michigan.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The research on the connection between personal nomenclature and professional trajectory is a sparsely trodden pathway in the annals of academic inquiry. Smith (2015) explores the psychological implications of name popularity and occupational preferences in "Names and Numbers: A Psychological Analysis," shedding light on the subtle nuances that may shape an individual's career choices. Whereas Doe (2018) delves into the sociocultural aspects of naming trends and their potential impact on labor market dynamics in "The Sociology of Names and Occupations." These serious studies offer a foundation for our investigation into the link between the prevalence of the first name "Corbin" and the professional pursuits of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan.
At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss the correlation between name popularity and occupational demographics as mere happenstance. However, a closer examination of the literature reveals that seemingly whimsical connections often harbor surprising depth. Jones (2020) delves into the intricacies of improbable correlations in "Oddball Connections: Exploring the Unlikely Ties That Bind," underscoring the profound and often inexplicable interplay between seemingly unrelated variables.
Turning to non-fiction works that inform our approach, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a quirky exploration of unanticipated correlations and hidden patterns in human behavior, providing a framework for embracing the unexpected in our own analysis. In a similar vein, "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell prompts consideration of unconventional factors that may influence career paths and occupational choices.
Drawing inspiration from sources that might seem ostensibly unrelated but harbor hidden relevance, the board game "Scrabble" serves as an illustrative analogy for our endeavor. Just as seemingly disparate letters align to form meaningful words on the game board, we seek to uncover the underlying connections between the popularity of the name "Corbin" and the composition of Michigan's gas plant workforce, perhaps revealing a surprising narrative akin to a fortuitous word alignment in a game of lexical chance.
In a lighthearted departure from the rigid confines of conventional literature review, we turn our attention to fiction works with titles that, while unrelated on the surface, offer a whimsical echo of our quest. "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Power of One" by Bryce Courtenay beckon us into the realm of storytelling and serendipitous connections, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a dash of narrative intrigue.
As we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of literature and scholarly discourse, it becomes evident that even the most serious of pursuits can benefit from a touch of levity and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. With this perspective in mind, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic bond between the name "Corbin" and the domain of gas plant operations, blurring the line between scholarly inquiry and delightful speculation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan from 2003 to 2020. A correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 was observed, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) also substantiated this association, with a value of 0.6769596, suggesting that approximately 67.7% of the variation in the number of gas plant operators can be explained by the popularity of the name "Corbin."
In addition, the statistical analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the significance of this correlation and providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Fig. 1 visually depicts the compelling correlation between the frequency of the name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan, with a scatterplot showcasing the notable clustering of data points.
The strength of this correlation prompts contemplation of the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to this curious association. While our findings shed light on this unexpected relationship between nomenclature trends and occupational choices, they also underscore the need for further exploration and inquiry into the quirky interplay between names and numbers in the context of the energy sector.
The whimsical nature of this correlation impels us to acknowledge the humorous and light-hearted aspect of our scholarly endeavors, as we delve into the realm of monikers and manpower, aiming to uncover the playful intersection of Corbins and carbons in the energy landscape of Michigan.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unforeseen correlation between the popularity of the name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan invites a blend of fascination and amusement as we navigate the intersection of naming trends and occupational demographics. Our findings align with the existing literature that subtly hints at the influence of nomenclature on career choices. In particular, the study by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018) forms a delightful backdrop to our own investigation, underscoring the unanticipated depth behind name-related dynamics. Indeed, as Jones (2020) suggests, the seemingly whimsical connections often unravel captivating narratives, much like the unexpected triumph of a triple word score in a game of research endeavor Scrabble.

The statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the persuasiveness of the p-value not only validate the significance of our findings but also beckon us to embrace the serendipitous nature of this unforeseen connection. The depth of this correlation mesmerizes and tantalizes the scientific imagination, akin to the wonderment one experiences upon finding the perfect rhyme in a game of academic Scrabble. The notable clustering of data points, as depicted in our visually captivating scatterplot, mirrors the synergy of letters aligning to create meaningful words in the scholarly lexicon.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the poignantly unexpected, much like the twist in a well-crafted story. Just as "The Name of the Wind" and "The Power of One" enrapture readers with their narrative prowess, our exploration of the correlation between "Corbin" and carbon-laden industry offers a whimsical narrative fraught with intrigue and serendipity.

To this end, our scholarly pursuit meanders through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis with a touch of academic whimsy, as we delve into the enigmatic blend of monikers and manpower. The unexpected and humorous nature of our findings imbues our scholarly pursuit with a delightful spin, infusing the austere domain of academic inquiry with a playful wink and nod.

In the absence of a grave and stern discussion, our revelry in the statistical quirks and unexpected correlations serves as a testament to the idiosyncratic beauty that resides within the pursuit of knowledge. The apparent discord between the name "Corbin" and the gas plant operators of Michigan narrates an amusing tale of unlikely ties that, much like a jovial pun, prompts a chuckle and a second look.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Corbin and The number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The confluence of names and numbers, identities and occupations, has long been a subject of intrigue, albeit not one that typically garners the same amount of attention as more conventional research inquiries. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we find ourselves delving into the peculiar realm of nomenclature trends and their curious connection to the workforce within the energy sector. Specifically, we embark on a whimsical journey to examine the correlation - a correlation observed in this investigation and that doesn't leave us pass gas - between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the illustrious state of Michigan.
While some might dismiss such an undertaking as frivolous or quixotic, one cannot help but be drawn to the irresistible allure of uncovering correlations that seem to defy all logic and reason. It's always fascinating when statistical analysis, like a pair of worn-out lab goggles, brings into focus unexpected patterns and connections. Indeed, the correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 that emerged from our eminent data scrutiny practically leaped off the pages, demanding attention and ponderous contemplation.
The very notion that a seemingly inconsequential variable such as the popularity of a first name could be intertwined with the labor force in a specific industry gives us pause for wry mirth. Surely, we are not alone in experiencing a chuckle at the thought that a name like "Corbin" could hold sway over the occupational choices of individuals destined for the gas plant domain. Is it sheer coincidence, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we set out on this venture, we are primed to unearth such revelations and perhaps find ourselves gasping at the profundity of the underlying mechanisms that drive this seemingly fortuitous linkage.
With a nod to levity and an acknowledgement of the delightful peculiarity of our pursuits, this research sets out to not only unravel the statistical underpinnings of this correlation but also to infuse the exploration with a lightness of tone, acknowledging the inherent whimsy of its subject matter. After all, the world of research and scholarly inquiry need not be bereft of humor and the occasional pun. With this in mind, we embark on our intrepid journey to unravel the confounding connections between Corbins and carbons, all in the name of whimsical scholarship.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan from 2003 to 2020. A correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 was observed, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) also substantiated this association, with a value of 0.6769596, suggesting that approximately 67.7% of the variation in the number of gas plant operators can be explained by the popularity of the name "Corbin."
In addition, the statistical analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the significance of this correlation and providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Fig. 1 visually depicts the compelling correlation between the frequency of the name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan, with a scatterplot showcasing the notable clustering of data points.
The strength of this correlation prompts contemplation of the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to this curious association. While our findings shed light on this unexpected relationship between nomenclature trends and occupational choices, they also underscore the need for further exploration and inquiry into the quirky interplay between names and numbers in the context of the energy sector.
The whimsical nature of this correlation impels us to acknowledge the humorous and light-hearted aspect of our scholarly endeavors, as we delve into the realm of monikers and manpower, aiming to uncover the playful intersection of Corbins and carbons in the energy landscape of Michigan.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this study has brought to light the delightfully unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in Michigan. Our findings, while initially met with raised eyebrows and quizzical looks, have undoubtedly sparked curiosity and a few chuckles among the scholarly community. The statistical evidence of this correlation has left us feeling positively gaseous with excitement. Nevertheless, it is abundantly clear that the linkage between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector has defied conventional expectations and beckons further exploration.

As we bid adieu to our whimsical adventure, it's clear that no stone, or perhaps in this case, no carbon or Corbin, should be left unturned. The unexpected alignment of Corbins and carbons reminds us that humor need not be a rare gas within the realm of scholastic inquiry. With that in mind, we boldly assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, it's perfectly normal for science to occasionally leave us gasping for breath in both wonder and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Demographics and Industry Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Name-Based Occupational Trends (SNOT)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Corbin to Carbon: An Analysis of the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name 'Corbin' and the Number of Gas Plant Operators in Michigan with an abstract of This study explores the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Corbin" and the number of gas plant operators in the state of Michigan. Employing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2020, we reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8227755 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these disparate variables. Our findings suggest a rather unexpected link between nomenclature trends and occupational choices in the energy sector. The implications and potential underlying mechanisms of this correlation are subject to speculation and merit further investigation. This paper aims to shed light on this peculiar phenomenon, offering a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of monikers and manpower in the Great Lakes State's energy landscape.

ChatGPT:

Corbin, name popularity, gas plant operators, Michigan, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, energy sector, nomenclature trends, occupational choices, great lakes state, energy landscape

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Corbin
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Corbin
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Corbin

The number of gas plant operators in Michigan
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of gas plant operators in Michigan
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of gas plant operators in Michigan

Correlation r = 0.8227755 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6769596 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of gas plant operators in Michigan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Corbin) over the 18 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-5. 0.0000276037598260085620000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.0028% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,227 random variables You don't actually need 36 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Popularity of the first name Corbin (Babies born)11241230108311921474135912361373172616271722194217861618144212861194934
The number of gas plant operators in Michigan (Gas Plant Operators)8067046050047052054061082086010009601290710480300490340




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1124,1230,1083,1192,1474,1359,1236,1373,1726,1627,1722,1942,1786,1618,1442,1286,1194,934,])
array_2 = np.array([80,670,460,500,470,520,540,610,820,860,1000,960,1290,710,480,300,490,340,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Corbin"
array_2_name = "The number of gas plant operators in Michigan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 3294 · Black Variable ID: 2819 · Red Variable ID: 9834
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0