about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,289 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the corn grew bigger and stronger, it developed a natural talent for hitting home runs. These superstar cornstalks were then recruited to join the Washington Nationals, drawing massive crowds eager to watch the most a-maize-ing players in baseball history. Corny, but true!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games: A scene from Skyrim ] Create an image of a bustling dirt road in the style of Skyrim, with the Washington Nationals ballpark towering in the distance. Fans line up at old-fashioned concession stands where vendors are serving sizzling hot dogs to hungry patrons. The aroma of the hot dogs wafts through the air, drawing in even more fantasy-style fans. The ticket sales booth is bustling with excitement as people purchase tickets to the game, eager to enjoy the delicious hot dogs made with GMO corn while cheering on the Nationals. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting 3D Pixar Style Woodblock painting A scene from Skyrim Voxel art
ChatGPT: Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games, in the following situation: Because GMO corn makes the ballpark hot dogs taste better, leading to more fans attending games and boosting ticket sales.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: At the Washington Nationals ballpark, fans line up at the concession stands for hot dogs made from GMO corn. The aroma of sizzling hot dogs fills the air, drawing in even more fans. The ticket sales booth is bustling with excited people buying tickets to the game, excited to enjoy the delicious hot dogs made with GMO corn while cheering on the Nationals.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games: A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: At the Washington Nationals ballpark, fans line up at the concession stands for hot dogs made from GMO corn. The aroma of sizzling hot dogs fills the air, drawing in even more fans. The ticket sales booth is bustling with excited people buying tickets to the game, excited to enjoy the delicious hot dogs made with GMO corn while cheering on the Nationals. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games: A scene from Skyrim ] Create an image of a bustling dirt road in the style of Skyrim, with the Washington Nationals ballpark towering in the distance. Fans line up at old-fashioned concession stands where vendors are serving sizzling hot dogs to hungry patrons. The aroma of the hot dogs wafts through the air, drawing in even more fantasy-style fans. The ticket sales booth is bustling with excitement as people purchase tickets to the game, eager to enjoy the delicious hot dogs made with GMO corn while cheering on the Nationals.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales

The Journal of Culinary and Cultural Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Baseball-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8274054 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales" is the kernel of truth you never knew you needed. In this exciting new study, we take a closer look at the relationship between genetically modified (GMO) corn and the attendance at Washington Nationals games. This research aims to uncover the cob-nection between agricultural practices and America's favorite pastime.

Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do GMO corn and baseball have in common?" Well, strap in, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of statistics, sports, and science that will leave you feeling corn-fused and popping with excitement.

The idea for this study stemmed from an ear-resistible curiosity about the potential impact of GMO corn on public behavior. We couldn't help but wonder if the genetically enhanced kernels were doing more than just growing bigger and stronger - were they also somehow influencing the crowds at Nationals Park? Our research aims to answer this question while also peppering in some corny jokes along the way.

As we delve into the data, we'll be uncovering some A-maize-ing correlations and brushing aside any cob-webs of doubt about the validity of our research. Our findings are anything but corny, as they demonstrate a strong association between GMO corn usage and the ticket sales for Nationals games. This study will let the statistics game play out and hopefully hit a home run in shedding light on the impact of agricultural practices on spectator sports.

So grab your peanuts and Cracker Jack, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of maize, games, and aim to uncover the popcorn kernel of truth in this a-maize-ing connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales" is the kernel of truth you never knew you needed. In this exciting new study, we take a closer look at the relationship between genetically modified (GMO) corn and the attendance at Washington Nationals games. This research aims to uncover the cob-nection between agricultural practices and America's favorite pastime.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do GMO corn and baseball have in common?" Well, strap in, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of statistics, sports, and science that will leave you feeling corn-fused and popping with excitement.
The idea for this study stemmed from an ear-resistible curiosity about the potential impact of GMO corn on public behavior. We couldn't help but wonder if the genetically enhanced kernels were doing more than just growing bigger and stronger - were they also somehow influencing the crowds at Nationals Park? Our research aims to answer this question while also peppering in some corny jokes along the way.
As we delve into the data, we'll be uncovering some A-maize-ing correlations and brushing aside any cob-webs of doubt about the validity of our research. Our findings are anything but corny, as they demonstrate a strong association between GMO corn usage and the ticket sales for Nationals games. This study will let the statistics game play out and hopefully hit a home run in shedding light on the impact of agricultural practices on spectator sports.
So grab your peanuts and Cracker Jack, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of maize, games, and aim to uncover the popcorn kernel of truth in this a-maize-ing connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2015) investigated the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on crop yields and agricultural practices. Their study, however, failed to mention anything about baseball or Nationals games. Likewise, Jones et al. (2017) explored the use of GMOs in corn production, but their research was notably silent on the corn's potential influence on sports attendance. It seems that these studies missed the corn-nection between GMO corn and Washington Nationals ticket sales.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Pollan (2006) delves into the complexities of American agriculture and food choices. While Pollan offers valuable insights into the corn industry, he unfortunately neglects to mention how GMO corn might impact the popularity of a baseball game. On the other hand, "Field of Dreams" by Kinsella (1982) is a fictional novel that revolves around baseball and the magical allure of a cornfield, but it does not explore the impact of genetic modification on corn or game attendance.

As we turn to the realm of television, we take note of "Breaking Bad," a show with a storyline that involves methamphetamine production using methylamine - an organic compound that contains carbon and nitrogen. While the show doesn't address GMO corn or Washington Nationals games, it does feature a character named Badger, which is just a hop, skip, and a jump away from corn kernels in terms of word association. Similarly, "The Office" has nothing to do with corn or baseball, but who could resist the kernel of humor within each episode?

It seems that the literature has largely overlooked the intriguing relationship between GMO corn and Nationals ticket sales, leaving us to embark on our own maize-filled adventure through this research. So, hold onto your hats - or, in this case, your corn husks - as we dive deep into the a-maize-ing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.

With that said, let us plow through the field of prior research and cultivate a deeper understanding of how GMO corn may be popping up in the world of baseball spectators.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Baseball-Reference.com . You used data from 2000 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales" is the kernel of truth you never knew you needed. In this exciting new study, we take a closer look at the relationship between genetically modified (GMO) corn and the attendance at Washington Nationals games. This research aims to uncover the cob-nection between agricultural practices and America's favorite pastime.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do GMO corn and baseball have in common?" Well, strap in, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of statistics, sports, and science that will leave you feeling corn-fused and popping with excitement.
The idea for this study stemmed from an ear-resistible curiosity about the potential impact of GMO corn on public behavior. We couldn't help but wonder if the genetically enhanced kernels were doing more than just growing bigger and stronger - were they also somehow influencing the crowds at Nationals Park? Our research aims to answer this question while also peppering in some corny jokes along the way.
As we delve into the data, we'll be uncovering some A-maize-ing correlations and brushing aside any cob-webs of doubt about the validity of our research. Our findings are anything but corny, as they demonstrate a strong association between GMO corn usage and the ticket sales for Nationals games. This study will let the statistics game play out and hopefully hit a home run in shedding light on the impact of agricultural practices on spectator sports.
So grab your peanuts and Cracker Jack, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of maize, games, and aim to uncover the popcorn kernel of truth in this a-maize-ing connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To crack open the kernel of truth behind the potential relationship between GMO corn and Washington Nationals ticket sales, our research team took an a-maize-ing journey through the world of data collection, statistical analysis, and agricultural sleuthing. We collected data from USDA reports on GMO corn production and usage, as well as game attendance figures and ticket sales data from Baseball-Reference.com. It was a-maize-ing to see how much data we could corncentrate into our analysis! From 2000 to 2019, we peeled back the husks on this cob-stantly evolving relationship in order to gain a better understanding of the potential impact of genetically modified corn on crowd size at Nationals Park.

Now, you might be wondering, "How did you even begin to measure such a husky topic?" Well, it involved a lot of ear-ly mornings and late nights poring over data, running regression analyses, and plot-corn the best approach to uncovering any potential correlations. We also used a-maize-ing statistical tools to compute the correlation coefficient and conduct hypothesis testing with a p-value less than 0.01, all while trying not to get lost in the kernel of statistical significance.

To avoid getting too corn-fused by the plethora of variables at play, we employed rigorous statistical methods to control for other factors that could huskily influence game attendance. This included factoring in variables such as team performance, weather conditions, promotions, and the availability of buttery popcorn at the stadium. After all, we couldn't discount the possibility of popcorn having an influence on ticket sales as well - after all, who can resist the allure of the buttery aroma wafting through the stands?

Despite the cornucopia of data sources, we had to be cautious about cherry-picking our findings and remained rigorously corn-sistent in our approach. We ensured that our data was as fresh as a newly harvested ear of corn, free from any cob-webs of inaccuracy or bias. It was a-maize-ing how we managed to maize-ter the art of balancing humor with scientific precision throughout our research process!

In summary, our methodology involved a-maize-ing levels of dedication, a bushel of statistical analysis, and a keen eye for spotting any potentially pop-cornfound correlations. We believe that our approach has shucked the convention for what can be achieved in agri-cultural and statistical research, and we hope that our findings will pop open new avenues of exploration into the impacts of GMO corn on the world of sports. So, let's pop some champagne (or perhaps just enjoy a bag of fresh popcorn) as we move on to the results of our a-maize-ing study!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Baseball-Reference.com .

For the time period 2000 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8274054, r-squared of 0.6845997, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales" is the kernel of truth you never knew you needed. In this exciting new study, we take a closer look at the relationship between genetically modified (GMO) corn and the attendance at Washington Nationals games. This research aims to uncover the cob-nection between agricultural practices and America's favorite pastime.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do GMO corn and baseball have in common?" Well, strap in, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of statistics, sports, and science that will leave you feeling corn-fused and popping with excitement.
The idea for this study stemmed from an ear-resistible curiosity about the potential impact of GMO corn on public behavior. We couldn't help but wonder if the genetically enhanced kernels were doing more than just growing bigger and stronger - were they also somehow influencing the crowds at Nationals Park? Our research aims to answer this question while also peppering in some corny jokes along the way.
As we delve into the data, we'll be uncovering some A-maize-ing correlations and brushing aside any cob-webs of doubt about the validity of our research. Our findings are anything but corny, as they demonstrate a strong association between GMO corn usage and the ticket sales for Nationals games. This study will let the statistics game play out and hopefully hit a home run in shedding light on the impact of agricultural practices on spectator sports.
So grab your peanuts and Cracker Jack, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of maize, games, and aim to uncover the popcorn kernel of truth in this a-maize-ing connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our research peeled back the husk and revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054 between the use of GMO corn and ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. This strong correlation indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, like the perfect pair of batting gloves and a baseball player's hands.

The r-squared value of 0.6845997 further highlights the quality of fit between GMO corn usage and the popularity of Nationals games. It's like hitting a grand slam with your statistical model; it just feels right.

With a p < 0.01, our results are statistically significant, meaning that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. We've hit statistical pay dirt, my friends!

Now, let's take a look at Figure 1 (not included here, but imagine it's a beautiful scatterplot). This masterpiece of data visualization showcases the undeniable association between GMO corn usage and Nationals game attendance. It's like a work of art, depicting the melodious harmony between agricultural practices and sports fandom.

In conclusion, our research has cracked open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance. The influence of these enhanced corn kernels extends beyond the field and into the hearts and minds of Nationals fans. With these findings, we've shown that agricultural practices and America's beloved pastime are more closely intertwined than we ever kernel'd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) investigated the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on crop yields and agricultural practices. Their study, however, failed to mention anything about baseball or Nationals games. Likewise, Jones et al. (2017) explored the use of GMOs in corn production, but their research was notably silent on the corn's potential influence on sports attendance. It seems that these studies missed the corn-nection between GMO corn and Washington Nationals ticket sales.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Pollan (2006) delves into the complexities of American agriculture and food choices. While Pollan offers valuable insights into the corn industry, he unfortunately neglects to mention how GMO corn might impact the popularity of a baseball game. On the other hand, "Field of Dreams" by Kinsella (1982) is a fictional novel that revolves around baseball and the magical allure of a cornfield, but it does not explore the impact of genetic modification on corn or game attendance.
As we turn to the realm of television, we take note of "Breaking Bad," a show with a storyline that involves methamphetamine production using methylamine - an organic compound that contains carbon and nitrogen. While the show doesn't address GMO corn or Washington Nationals games, it does feature a character named Badger, which is just a hop, skip, and a jump away from corn kernels in terms of word association. Similarly, "The Office" has nothing to do with corn or baseball, but who could resist the kernel of humor within each episode?
It seems that the literature has largely overlooked the intriguing relationship between GMO corn and Nationals ticket sales, leaving us to embark on our own maize-filled adventure through this research. So, hold onto your hats - or, in this case, your corn husks - as we dive deep into the a-maize-ing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
With that said, let us plow through the field of prior research and cultivate a deeper understanding of how GMO corn may be popping up in the world of baseball spectators.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research peeled back the husk and revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054 between the use of GMO corn and ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. This strong correlation indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, like the perfect pair of batting gloves and a baseball player's hands.
The r-squared value of 0.6845997 further highlights the quality of fit between GMO corn usage and the popularity of Nationals games. It's like hitting a grand slam with your statistical model; it just feels right.
With a p < 0.01, our results are statistically significant, meaning that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. We've hit statistical pay dirt, my friends!
Now, let's take a look at Figure 1 (not included here, but imagine it's a beautiful scatterplot). This masterpiece of data visualization showcases the undeniable association between GMO corn usage and Nationals game attendance. It's like a work of art, depicting the melodious harmony between agricultural practices and sports fandom.
In conclusion, our research has cracked open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance. The influence of these enhanced corn kernels extends beyond the field and into the hearts and minds of Nationals fans. With these findings, we've shown that agricultural practices and America's beloved pastime are more closely intertwined than we ever kernel'd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have indeed corn-firmed what many may have initially dismissed as a popcorn-worthy notion - there is a kernel of truth to the relationship between GMO corn and Washington Nationals ticket sales. The strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value paint a picture of the a-maize-ing influence of GMO corn on game attendance, much like the perfect blend of butter and salt on a fresh batch of popcorn.

Turning back to our literature review, while it may have been quite the earful, the oversight of prior studies regarding the potential impact of GMO corn on Nationals game attendance has left us in a maize of disbelief. However, our results have husked away any doubts, showing how this overlooked connection is as substantial as a bushel of premium, GMO-enhanced corn.

Smith and Doe's study on GMOs and agricultural practices, albeit lacking in its mention of baseball, inadvertently laid the groundwork for our research by demonstrating the wider impacts of GMO usage. Similarly, Pollan's insights into the corn industry, though not pertaining to sports attendance, gave us a cornucopia of context for understanding the role of GMOs in shaping public preferences, even those related to baseball.

The high r-squared value further instills confidence in the robustness of our model, akin to the strength of a finely engineered baseball bat. This statistical support signifies that our findings are not just a mere statistical curveball, but rather an essential play in understanding the relationship between agricultural innovations and the allure of a good ol' ball game.

Finally, our results have effectively hit a grand slam in demonstrating the close intertwining of agricultural practices and sports fandom. They provide a solid basis for further exploration, planting the seeds for future research into the peculiar yet impactful confluence of GMO corn and Nationals game attendance. With that said, it appears that the husk has been fully peeled back on this matter, and we've hit a statistical home run in uncovering the undeniable influence of a-maize-ing corn on the popularity of Washington Nationals games.

So, as the curtain falls on this discussion, we bid farewell with a heartfelt "corngratulations" to those who have supported us through this journey. Let's keep the spirit of inquiry and discovery alive, much like the crackling excitement of a popping kernel – for there may be even more a-maize-ing connections awaiting our scientific gaze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales" is the kernel of truth you never knew you needed. In this exciting new study, we take a closer look at the relationship between genetically modified (GMO) corn and the attendance at Washington Nationals games. This research aims to uncover the cob-nection between agricultural practices and America's favorite pastime.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do GMO corn and baseball have in common?" Well, strap in, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of statistics, sports, and science that will leave you feeling corn-fused and popping with excitement.
The idea for this study stemmed from an ear-resistible curiosity about the potential impact of GMO corn on public behavior. We couldn't help but wonder if the genetically enhanced kernels were doing more than just growing bigger and stronger - were they also somehow influencing the crowds at Nationals Park? Our research aims to answer this question while also peppering in some corny jokes along the way.
As we delve into the data, we'll be uncovering some A-maize-ing correlations and brushing aside any cob-webs of doubt about the validity of our research. Our findings are anything but corny, as they demonstrate a strong association between GMO corn usage and the ticket sales for Nationals games. This study will let the statistics game play out and hopefully hit a home run in shedding light on the impact of agricultural practices on spectator sports.
So grab your peanuts and Cracker Jack, because we're about to embark on a journey through the world of maize, games, and aim to uncover the popcorn kernel of truth in this a-maize-ing connection.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research peeled back the husk and revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054 between the use of GMO corn and ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. This strong correlation indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, like the perfect pair of batting gloves and a baseball player's hands.
The r-squared value of 0.6845997 further highlights the quality of fit between GMO corn usage and the popularity of Nationals games. It's like hitting a grand slam with your statistical model; it just feels right.
With a p < 0.01, our results are statistically significant, meaning that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. We've hit statistical pay dirt, my friends!
Now, let's take a look at Figure 1 (not included here, but imagine it's a beautiful scatterplot). This masterpiece of data visualization showcases the undeniable association between GMO corn usage and Nationals game attendance. It's like a work of art, depicting the melodious harmony between agricultural practices and sports fandom.
In conclusion, our research has cracked open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance. The influence of these enhanced corn kernels extends beyond the field and into the hearts and minds of Nationals fans. With these findings, we've shown that agricultural practices and America's beloved pastime are more closely intertwined than we ever kernel'd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a-maize-ing insights into the connection between GMO corn and the ever-popular Washington Nationals games. This correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, is as solid as a perfectly popped kernel. Our results beg the question: Are the genetically modified kernels whispering "Buy tickets to the game" as they grow? It's like they have their own secret fan club! Our findings have undoubtedly hit a home run in showcasing the impact of agricultural practices on sports spectatorship, and it's safe to say that the influence of GMO corn extends far beyond the cornfields.

With these results in hand, it's clear that we've hit the statistical jackpot, like finding a needle in a haystack made of fans' foam fingers. The data speaks for itself, and our research has proven to be as reliable as a well-oiled baseball glove.

So, where do we go from here? Well, it's time to butter up our conclusions and enjoy the fruits of our labor. Our findings have undoubtedly sparked a-maize-ing conversations and have popped the lid off a previously husk-hidden relationship. It's safe to say that GMO corn and game attendance go together like peanuts and Cracker Jack, and there's no need for further research in this area. The results are as clear as a blue sky at the ballpark - the connection between GMO corn and Nationals ticket sales is indeed a-maize-ing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary and Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Agricultural Advancement and Entertainment Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Popcorn and Popularity: A-maize-ing Connection Between GMO Corn and Washington Nationals Ticket Sales with an abstract of Our research delves deep into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified (GMO) corn and the ticket sales for Washington Nationals games. Using data from the USDA and Baseball-Reference.com, our findings revealed an ear-resistible correlation coefficient of 0.8274054, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2000 to 2019. Our study peels back the husk on this often-overlooked relationship and sheds light on the kernel of truth behind the influence of GMO corn on crowd size at Nationals Park. Join us as we pop through the data and crack open the case of GMO corn's impact on the ball game attendance.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Washington Nationals tickets, GMO corn impact on crowd size, genetically modified corn and baseball attendance, USDA data on GMO corn, Baseball-Reference.com data analysis, correlation between GMO corn and baseball attendance, influence of GMO corn on Nationals Park attendance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in the United States that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games
Detailed data title: Total tickets sold in home games for the Washington Nationals
Source: Baseball-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games

Correlation r = 0.8274054 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6845997 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 20 years from 2000 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-6. 0.0000067730216334165050000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00068% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 147,645 random variables You don't actually need 147 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)2526344047526173808586888890939292929292
Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games (Tickets sold)9262726427458120451025640749550273199021530601943810232040018172301828070194048023707902652420257939026198402481940252498025296002259780




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([25,26,34,40,47,52,61,73,80,85,86,88,88,90,93,92,92,92,92,92,])
array_2 = np.array([926272,642745,812045,1025640,749550,2731990,2153060,1943810,2320400,1817230,1828070,1940480,2370790,2652420,2579390,2619840,2481940,2524980,2529600,2259780,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Ticket sales for Washington Nationals games"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3289 · Black Variable ID: 766 · Red Variable ID: 4422
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0