about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,272 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn started expressing its kernel of emotions, leading to a-maize-ing confusion among internet users. It seems like the corn's cob-fusing behavior was causing people to really ear-responsibly lose their kernels of thought. The situation just kept popping up, leaving everyone in a real cornumdrum. The whole thing was just unbe-corn-able!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a meme where a person, standing in a rural Minnesota cornfield, looks frustrated as they type "i cant even" into a smartphone's search bar. The tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under a bright blue sky, and the person's expression and the cornfield setting convey the sense of exasperation with modern dietary challenges and technological dependence. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Vaporwave Scalar art Pop art Brutalism
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: Due to genetically modified corn in MN causing elevated levels of high fructose corn syrup in diets, people's blood sugar levels are spiking, leading to increased frustration and "i cant even" Google searches as they struggle to process the sugar rush.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a rural Minnesota cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under a bright blue sky. In the foreground, a person holding a smartphone furrows their brow in frustration as they type "i cant even" into the Google search bar, their blood sugar spiking from an excess of high fructose corn syrup in their diet.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a rural Minnesota cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under a bright blue sky. In the foreground, a person holding a smartphone furrows their brow in frustration as they type "i cant even" into the Google search bar, their blood sugar spiking from an excess of high fructose corn syrup in their diet. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a meme where a person, standing in a rural Minnesota cornfield, looks frustrated as they type "i cant even" into a smartphone's search bar. The tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under a bright blue sky, and the person's expression and the cornfield setting convey the sense of exasperation with modern dietary challenges and technological dependence.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

The Journal of Agri-Genetic Quirks

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The seemingly transient nature of internet searches has long been a source of curiosity and horticultural researchers have plowed the fields of information looking for underlying connections. The intricate dance between the agricultural industry and the digital realm has led to a stalk-worthy discovery in the form of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." This study seeks to unravel this enigmatic link, which has sown the seeds of intrigue in the minds of both agricultural and psychological researchers.

As we dig into the soil of this peculiar phenomenon, we must first acknowledge the kernel of doubt surrounding the veracity of this connection. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss it as nothing more than a stalk-tale, a mere coincidental occurrence lost in the labyrinth of digital data. However, the roots of our research sprout from a deep-seated curiosity and a fervent desire to unearth the truth, even if it requires sifting through a mountain of statistical chaff.

Previous literature has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental implications of GMO use in agriculture, often overlooking the potential ripple effects on the collective psyche of the populace. This study pivots on the hypothesis that there exists an intricate correlation between the proliferation of GMOs in the cornfields of Minnesota and the emergence of an existential malaise reflected in the peculiar verbal expression of "I cant even." Our pursuit to unearth the truth behind this correlation has led us on a journey that spans the scope of statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and the ever-evolving landscape of agricultural innovation.

Through a meticulous dissection of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have unearthed a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient that is nothing short of a-MAIZE-ing, and a p-value that fell lower than a kernel of corn in a storm. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and leads one to ponder the notion that the humble corn, in its genetically modified form, may hold the key to decoding the linguistic and emotional fabric of the digital age.

As we embark on this corn-filled journey, we invite researchers from diverse fields – from agriculture to linguistics to psychology – to join us in peeling back the layers of this peculiar correlation. Let us embrace the spirit of a curious farmer, eager to till the fertile soil of knowledge and discover the hidden harvest of insights that awaits amidst the stalks of data. For in this tangled maize, we may find not just food for thought, but a bounty of revelations that transcend the boundaries of traditional research domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly transient nature of internet searches has long been a source of curiosity and horticultural researchers have plowed the fields of information looking for underlying connections. The intricate dance between the agricultural industry and the digital realm has led to a stalk-worthy discovery in the form of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." This study seeks to unravel this enigmatic link, which has sown the seeds of intrigue in the minds of both agricultural and psychological researchers.
As we dig into the soil of this peculiar phenomenon, we must first acknowledge the kernel of doubt surrounding the veracity of this connection. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss it as nothing more than a stalk-tale, a mere coincidental occurrence lost in the labyrinth of digital data. However, the roots of our research sprout from a deep-seated curiosity and a fervent desire to unearth the truth, even if it requires sifting through a mountain of statistical chaff.
Previous literature has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental implications of GMO use in agriculture, often overlooking the potential ripple effects on the collective psyche of the populace. This study pivots on the hypothesis that there exists an intricate correlation between the proliferation of GMOs in the cornfields of Minnesota and the emergence of an existential malaise reflected in the peculiar verbal expression of "I cant even." Our pursuit to unearth the truth behind this correlation has led us on a journey that spans the scope of statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and the ever-evolving landscape of agricultural innovation.
Through a meticulous dissection of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have unearthed a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient that is nothing short of a-MAIZE-ing, and a p-value that fell lower than a kernel of corn in a storm. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and leads one to ponder the notion that the humble corn, in its genetically modified form, may hold the key to decoding the linguistic and emotional fabric of the digital age.
As we embark on this corn-filled journey, we invite researchers from diverse fields – from agriculture to linguistics to psychology – to join us in peeling back the layers of this peculiar correlation. Let us embrace the spirit of a curious farmer, eager to till the fertile soil of knowledge and discover the hidden harvest of insights that awaits amidst the stalks of data. For in this tangled maize, we may find not just food for thought, but a bounty of revelations that transcend the boundaries of traditional research domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even" has garnered attention from an eclectic array of academic disciplines. The enigmatic correlation at the heart of this study has prompted researchers to reap insights from a cornucopia of scholarly sources. As we delve into the literature surrounding this intriguing subject, we recognize the need to sift through the academic tangle with the analytical precision of a discerning farmer examining the kernels amidst a bountiful harvest.

Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic implications of GMO use in corn production, offering thorough insights into yield increases and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) examined the environmental ramifications of GMO cultivation, highlighting the potential impact on soil biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics. However, while these studies enrich our understanding of the agricultural landscape, they cast little light on the peculiar interplay between GMOs and internet search behavior, leaving us to embark on a quest akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or rather, a corn crop in a field.

Turning our gaze to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive exploration of modern agricultural practices and their impact on societal health and well-being. Drawing inspiration from Pollan's insightful work, our study aspires not only to uncover the correlation between GMO use and internet searches but also to ponder the existential conundrum that finds expression in the phrase "I cant even" within the digital domain.

In the realm of fiction, "The Cornish Trilogy" by Robertson Davies hints at the allegorical potential of corn as a symbol of growth and transformation, offering an imaginative departure from the empirical rigors of data analysis. Indeed, our research endeavors to navigate through the fertile soil of creative thought while remaining firmly anchored in the empirical terrain of quantitative analysis.

In a whimsical deviation from traditional academic sources, we draw inspiration from childhood cartoons such as "Corn & Peg" and "VeggieTales," as well as educational programs like "Bill Nye the Science Guy," that instilled in us an early fascination with the natural world and animated our curiosity for the inexplicable intersections of science and culture.

As we traverse this peculiar maze of literature, we recognize that our journey is infused with a kernel of humor and a stalk of whimsy, resonating with the spirit of discovery and unearthing unexpected insights amidst the cornfields of knowledge. In doing so, we cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer, ever vigilant for the unexpected sprouts of wisdom that may emerge from the tilled soil of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly transient nature of internet searches has long been a source of curiosity and horticultural researchers have plowed the fields of information looking for underlying connections. The intricate dance between the agricultural industry and the digital realm has led to a stalk-worthy discovery in the form of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." This study seeks to unravel this enigmatic link, which has sown the seeds of intrigue in the minds of both agricultural and psychological researchers.
As we dig into the soil of this peculiar phenomenon, we must first acknowledge the kernel of doubt surrounding the veracity of this connection. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss it as nothing more than a stalk-tale, a mere coincidental occurrence lost in the labyrinth of digital data. However, the roots of our research sprout from a deep-seated curiosity and a fervent desire to unearth the truth, even if it requires sifting through a mountain of statistical chaff.
Previous literature has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental implications of GMO use in agriculture, often overlooking the potential ripple effects on the collective psyche of the populace. This study pivots on the hypothesis that there exists an intricate correlation between the proliferation of GMOs in the cornfields of Minnesota and the emergence of an existential malaise reflected in the peculiar verbal expression of "I cant even." Our pursuit to unearth the truth behind this correlation has led us on a journey that spans the scope of statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and the ever-evolving landscape of agricultural innovation.
Through a meticulous dissection of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have unearthed a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient that is nothing short of a-MAIZE-ing, and a p-value that fell lower than a kernel of corn in a storm. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and leads one to ponder the notion that the humble corn, in its genetically modified form, may hold the key to decoding the linguistic and emotional fabric of the digital age.
As we embark on this corn-filled journey, we invite researchers from diverse fields – from agriculture to linguistics to psychology – to join us in peeling back the layers of this peculiar correlation. Let us embrace the spirit of a curious farmer, eager to till the fertile soil of knowledge and discover the hidden harvest of insights that awaits amidst the stalks of data. For in this tangled maize, we may find not just food for thought, but a bounty of revelations that transcend the boundaries of traditional research domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate through the convoluted cornfields of data, we employed a multidisciplinary approach that blended statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and a healthy dose of curiosity. Our data collection encompassed a timeline spanning from 2004 to 2023, leveraging information obtained primarily from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends.

In our pursuit of this cornucopia of knowledge, we utilized a statistical analysis framework akin to navigating a corn maze at a county fair, only with more p-values and fewer hayrides. Based on the available data, we calculated a robust correlation coefficient between the use of GMOs in Minnesota's corn cultivation and the frequency of Google searches for "I cant even." The statistical analysis was conducted with all the precision of a farmer sowing seeds, aiming to unearth meaningful patterns amidst the vast expanse of data.

Furthermore, our linguistic inquiry involved peeling away layers of language to uncover hidden meanings and cultural nuances. We corn-sidered linguistic trends in online search behavior and sought to understand the underlying emotions and expressions that encapsulate the phrase "I cant even." This linguistic aspect of the research provided a fascinating insight into the way human emotions manifest in digital communication.

Our exploration of the agronomic landscape and its intersection with the digital realm bore fruit in the form of a unique synthesis of agricultural and emotional inquiry. We recognized the complexity of the research questions at hand, akin to untangling a particularly intricate ear of corn, and embraced the challenge with gusto.

As for the specifics of our statistical models and linguistic analyses, they were as intricate and complex as the labyrinthine pathways of a cornfield maze, albeit without the risk of being lost for hours. Through this methodological approach, we sought to shed light on the kernels of truth buried within the symbiotic relationship between GMO use in corn cultivation and the expression of existential fatigue in the digital sphere.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9078726, r-squared of 0.8242326, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The seemingly transient nature of internet searches has long been a source of curiosity and horticultural researchers have plowed the fields of information looking for underlying connections. The intricate dance between the agricultural industry and the digital realm has led to a stalk-worthy discovery in the form of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." This study seeks to unravel this enigmatic link, which has sown the seeds of intrigue in the minds of both agricultural and psychological researchers.
As we dig into the soil of this peculiar phenomenon, we must first acknowledge the kernel of doubt surrounding the veracity of this connection. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss it as nothing more than a stalk-tale, a mere coincidental occurrence lost in the labyrinth of digital data. However, the roots of our research sprout from a deep-seated curiosity and a fervent desire to unearth the truth, even if it requires sifting through a mountain of statistical chaff.
Previous literature has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental implications of GMO use in agriculture, often overlooking the potential ripple effects on the collective psyche of the populace. This study pivots on the hypothesis that there exists an intricate correlation between the proliferation of GMOs in the cornfields of Minnesota and the emergence of an existential malaise reflected in the peculiar verbal expression of "I cant even." Our pursuit to unearth the truth behind this correlation has led us on a journey that spans the scope of statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and the ever-evolving landscape of agricultural innovation.
Through a meticulous dissection of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have unearthed a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient that is nothing short of a-MAIZE-ing, and a p-value that fell lower than a kernel of corn in a storm. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and leads one to ponder the notion that the humble corn, in its genetically modified form, may hold the key to decoding the linguistic and emotional fabric of the digital age.
As we embark on this corn-filled journey, we invite researchers from diverse fields – from agriculture to linguistics to psychology – to join us in peeling back the layers of this peculiar correlation. Let us embrace the spirit of a curious farmer, eager to till the fertile soil of knowledge and discover the hidden harvest of insights that awaits amidst the stalks of data. For in this tangled maize, we may find not just food for thought, but a bounty of revelations that transcend the boundaries of traditional research domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected for the period 2004 to 2023 unveiled a rather shocking discovery. Our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." The correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 suggests a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.8242326 indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in "I cant even" searches can be explained by the variance in GMO corn usage. Furthermore, the p-value falling below 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and indicates that this finding is not merely the result of chance.

Notably, Figure 1 depicts the striking correlation between GMO use in Minnesota corn and the incidence of "I cant even" searches, leaving one to marvel at the unexpected intersection of agriculture and digital linguistics. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the undeniable bond between these variables, providing a compelling visual insight into the curious relationship that has germinated in the fertile fields of data.

Our findings, though initially surprising, beckon further exploration into the implications of this uncanny connection. The statistical relevance of our results encourages one to question the extent to which agricultural practices may leave an imprint on the collective consciousness, and begs the consideration of whether this correlation represents a mere kernel of a broader phenomenon. As we tread through the cornfields of inquiry, it becomes increasingly evident that the roots of our understanding may be entwined in a labyrinth of complexities that extend far beyond the scope of traditional research domains.

In summary, our study unearths a compelling link between GMO corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of "I cant even" searches, a discovery that challenges the boundaries of conventional agricultural and psychological wisdom. This correlation may very well signify the emergence of a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, where the fertile ground of agricultural innovation converges with the ever-blossoming landscape of digital expression and societal discourse. As researchers continue to till the soil of knowledge, this discovery urges us to remain open to the unexpected, for in the tangled maze of data lie the seeds of unparalleled insight and revelation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even" has garnered attention from an eclectic array of academic disciplines. The enigmatic correlation at the heart of this study has prompted researchers to reap insights from a cornucopia of scholarly sources. As we delve into the literature surrounding this intriguing subject, we recognize the need to sift through the academic tangle with the analytical precision of a discerning farmer examining the kernels amidst a bountiful harvest.
Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic implications of GMO use in corn production, offering thorough insights into yield increases and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) examined the environmental ramifications of GMO cultivation, highlighting the potential impact on soil biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics. However, while these studies enrich our understanding of the agricultural landscape, they cast little light on the peculiar interplay between GMOs and internet search behavior, leaving us to embark on a quest akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or rather, a corn crop in a field.
Turning our gaze to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive exploration of modern agricultural practices and their impact on societal health and well-being. Drawing inspiration from Pollan's insightful work, our study aspires not only to uncover the correlation between GMO use and internet searches but also to ponder the existential conundrum that finds expression in the phrase "I cant even" within the digital domain.
In the realm of fiction, "The Cornish Trilogy" by Robertson Davies hints at the allegorical potential of corn as a symbol of growth and transformation, offering an imaginative departure from the empirical rigors of data analysis. Indeed, our research endeavors to navigate through the fertile soil of creative thought while remaining firmly anchored in the empirical terrain of quantitative analysis.
In a whimsical deviation from traditional academic sources, we draw inspiration from childhood cartoons such as "Corn & Peg" and "VeggieTales," as well as educational programs like "Bill Nye the Science Guy," that instilled in us an early fascination with the natural world and animated our curiosity for the inexplicable intersections of science and culture.
As we traverse this peculiar maze of literature, we recognize that our journey is infused with a kernel of humor and a stalk of whimsy, resonating with the spirit of discovery and unearthing unexpected insights amidst the cornfields of knowledge. In doing so, we cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer, ever vigilant for the unexpected sprouts of wisdom that may emerge from the tilled soil of research.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected for the period 2004 to 2023 unveiled a rather shocking discovery. Our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." The correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 suggests a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.8242326 indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in "I cant even" searches can be explained by the variance in GMO corn usage. Furthermore, the p-value falling below 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and indicates that this finding is not merely the result of chance.
Notably, Figure 1 depicts the striking correlation between GMO use in Minnesota corn and the incidence of "I cant even" searches, leaving one to marvel at the unexpected intersection of agriculture and digital linguistics. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the undeniable bond between these variables, providing a compelling visual insight into the curious relationship that has germinated in the fertile fields of data.
Our findings, though initially surprising, beckon further exploration into the implications of this uncanny connection. The statistical relevance of our results encourages one to question the extent to which agricultural practices may leave an imprint on the collective consciousness, and begs the consideration of whether this correlation represents a mere kernel of a broader phenomenon. As we tread through the cornfields of inquiry, it becomes increasingly evident that the roots of our understanding may be entwined in a labyrinth of complexities that extend far beyond the scope of traditional research domains.
In summary, our study unearths a compelling link between GMO corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of "I cant even" searches, a discovery that challenges the boundaries of conventional agricultural and psychological wisdom. This correlation may very well signify the emergence of a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, where the fertile ground of agricultural innovation converges with the ever-blossoming landscape of digital expression and societal discourse. As researchers continue to till the soil of knowledge, this discovery urges us to remain open to the unexpected, for in the tangled maze of data lie the seeds of unparalleled insight and revelation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study shed light on the unexpected but compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Minnesota corn cultivation and the frequency of "I cant even" searches on Google. This discovery not only corroborates previous literature that hinted at the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and societal expressions but also delves into a cornucopia of potential implications that have hitherto remained obscured by the husk of conventional research.

Drawing from the economic literature that examined the ramifications of GMO use on crop yield, it is evident that our results serve as a poignant reminder that the impact of agricultural practices extends beyond the quantitative realm and delves into the psycho-linguistic sphere. Similarly, studies addressing the environmental consequences of GMO cultivation ought to consider the ripple effects on digital discourse, thereby embracing a holistic approach to understanding the broader implications of agricultural innovation.

Our study also resonates with allegorical interpretations of corn in literature and pop culture, where the symbol of growth and transformation mirrors the intricate relationship between agricultural developments and human expression. As scholars navigate through the fertile ground of data analysis, it becomes increasingly apparent that the tendrils of inquiry extend far beyond the traditional bounds of empirical research, entwining with artistic and imaginative realms akin to the fantastical narratives of "The Cornish Trilogy" or the whimsical antics of "Corn & Peg."

In light of these ruminations, our study unearths a kernel of truth that urges us to contemplate the implications of this correlation. The intertwined roots of agriculture and digital linguistics beckon scholars to embrace a perspective akin to a diligent farmer planting the seeds of wisdom in the fertile soil of interdisciplinary exploration. As we venture through this peculiar maze of findings, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge is not merely a linear journey but an intricate dance amidst the cornfields of diverse disciplines, yielding unexpected insights and sprouts of wisdom.

In essence, our research endeavors to corncern itself not only with the empirical validation of correlations but also with the cultivation of a mindful spirit that remains open to the unexpected twists and turns in the labyrinth of data. The emergence of this correlation signifies a synthesis between the rigorous terrain of quantitative analysis and the fertile ground of societal influence, propelling researchers to till the soil of knowledge with an open-minded and inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.

This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The seemingly transient nature of internet searches has long been a source of curiosity and horticultural researchers have plowed the fields of information looking for underlying connections. The intricate dance between the agricultural industry and the digital realm has led to a stalk-worthy discovery in the form of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." This study seeks to unravel this enigmatic link, which has sown the seeds of intrigue in the minds of both agricultural and psychological researchers.
As we dig into the soil of this peculiar phenomenon, we must first acknowledge the kernel of doubt surrounding the veracity of this connection. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss it as nothing more than a stalk-tale, a mere coincidental occurrence lost in the labyrinth of digital data. However, the roots of our research sprout from a deep-seated curiosity and a fervent desire to unearth the truth, even if it requires sifting through a mountain of statistical chaff.
Previous literature has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental implications of GMO use in agriculture, often overlooking the potential ripple effects on the collective psyche of the populace. This study pivots on the hypothesis that there exists an intricate correlation between the proliferation of GMOs in the cornfields of Minnesota and the emergence of an existential malaise reflected in the peculiar verbal expression of "I cant even." Our pursuit to unearth the truth behind this correlation has led us on a journey that spans the scope of statistical analysis, linguistic inquiry, and the ever-evolving landscape of agricultural innovation.
Through a meticulous dissection of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have unearthed a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient that is nothing short of a-MAIZE-ing, and a p-value that fell lower than a kernel of corn in a storm. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and leads one to ponder the notion that the humble corn, in its genetically modified form, may hold the key to decoding the linguistic and emotional fabric of the digital age.
As we embark on this corn-filled journey, we invite researchers from diverse fields – from agriculture to linguistics to psychology – to join us in peeling back the layers of this peculiar correlation. Let us embrace the spirit of a curious farmer, eager to till the fertile soil of knowledge and discover the hidden harvest of insights that awaits amidst the stalks of data. For in this tangled maize, we may find not just food for thought, but a bounty of revelations that transcend the boundaries of traditional research domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected for the period 2004 to 2023 unveiled a rather shocking discovery. Our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even." The correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 suggests a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.8242326 indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in "I cant even" searches can be explained by the variance in GMO corn usage. Furthermore, the p-value falling below 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and indicates that this finding is not merely the result of chance.
Notably, Figure 1 depicts the striking correlation between GMO use in Minnesota corn and the incidence of "I cant even" searches, leaving one to marvel at the unexpected intersection of agriculture and digital linguistics. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the undeniable bond between these variables, providing a compelling visual insight into the curious relationship that has germinated in the fertile fields of data.
Our findings, though initially surprising, beckon further exploration into the implications of this uncanny connection. The statistical relevance of our results encourages one to question the extent to which agricultural practices may leave an imprint on the collective consciousness, and begs the consideration of whether this correlation represents a mere kernel of a broader phenomenon. As we tread through the cornfields of inquiry, it becomes increasingly evident that the roots of our understanding may be entwined in a labyrinth of complexities that extend far beyond the scope of traditional research domains.
In summary, our study unearths a compelling link between GMO corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of "I cant even" searches, a discovery that challenges the boundaries of conventional agricultural and psychological wisdom. This correlation may very well signify the emergence of a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, where the fertile ground of agricultural innovation converges with the ever-blossoming landscape of digital expression and societal discourse. As researchers continue to till the soil of knowledge, this discovery urges us to remain open to the unexpected, for in the tangled maze of data lie the seeds of unparalleled insight and revelation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings serve as a gentle nudge to the academic community, prompting them to embrace a more curious and open-minded approach to research. While the correlation between GMO use in Minnesota corn and Google searches for "I cant even" may initially seem like a cornundrum, our study demonstrates that there is more than meets the eye in the fertile fields of data analysis. The cornucopia of statistical relevance we've unearthed points to a potential intertwining of agricultural practices and the linguistic zeitgeist of digital expression, offering a-MAIZE-ing insight into the complex tapestry of human behavior.

The robust positive relationship we've identified presents a thought-provoking puzzle that beckons further exploration. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, it sparkles like a golden ear of corn in the sun, enticing researchers from diverse fields to corn-vene and cultivate an interdisciplinary spirit akin to an array of crops in a diverse agricultural landscape.

Yet, while our findings may raise a chuckle or two among the research community, we must also recognize the significance of this discovery. It implodes the notion that the impact of agricultural practices is limited to economic and environmental domains, ushering in a new era where the emotional and linguistic fabric of society is considered part and parcel of the agricultural tapestry that weaves through our lives.

In light of these revelations, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this particular area. After all, how much more cornundrums can one handle before it becomes a-farmative that sometimes, research can indeed be as corn-fusing as a maze?

So, let us move forward, armed with a kernel of wisdom from this study, and sow the seeds of knowledge in other uncharted fields of inquiry. As we bid adieu to this enigmatic journey, we harvest not just insights but also a renewed fervor to embrace the unexpected and the seemingly corn-tradictory in our quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Genetic Quirks


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kernel Confusion: Exploring the GMO-Cant Even Correlation in Minnesota Corn with an abstract of In this research study, we delve into the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "I cant even". As we navigate through the tangled maize of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncover a remarkable correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The analysis reveals a cornucopia of statistical relevance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9078726 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, lending credence to the notion that GMOs and "I cant even" queries are not as independent as one might have previously surmised.
This research sheds light on a kernel of truth that compels one to ponder the conundrum of whether there exists a deeper, more kernel level connection between agricultural practices and the existential angst that finds expression in internet search behavior. Our findings prompt a corn-ucopia of questions about the impact of genetically modified corn on the collective psyche and linguistic habits of online users. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, we encourage future researchers to corn-sider the implications of this peculiar link and cultivate an inquisitive spirit akin to that of a diligent farmer tilling the fertile soil of knowledge.

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, Minnesota, Google searches, "I cant even" phrase, USDA data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, agricultural practices, internet search behavior, collective psyche, linguistic habits, genetically modified corn, research implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Minnesota genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9078726 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8242326 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-8. 0.0000000323719808020238700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 3.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 30,890,912 random variables You don't actually need 30 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota (GMO corn %)1111162840414648477881788082838079848683
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,11,16,28,40,41,46,48,47,78,81,78,80,82,83,80,79,84,86,83,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3272 · Black Variable ID: 744 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0