about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,204 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'desktop background'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Turns out, the corn was developing an unexpected kernel pattern that looked exactly like a picturesque sunset, and people couldn't get enough of it for their computer wallpapers! It's the latest in agriculture-meets-aesthetics. Corny backgrounds are the new trend in digital decor!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image with a Cyberpunk style showing a scene in a Kansas cornfield. In the center, a fretful farmer is holding a vibrant ear of GMO corn with hues of yellow, red, and blue. At a distance, depict a computer screen displaying a Google search for "desktop background" with limited and dull results. The emphasis should be on the juxtaposition of the colorful GMO corn and the scarcity of visually striking desktop backgrounds. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Macabre Cute 2D animation Pop art
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background', in the following situation: Because GMO corn in Kansas was used for making high-resolution desktop backgrounds, a decrease in GMO use led to a decrease in vibrant desktop background images. Farmers switched to heirloom corn, resulting in reduced availability of visually appealing images for computer screens.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Kansas cornfield, a farmer is holding an ear of colorful GMO corn, with vibrant hues of yellow, red, and blue. Nearby, a computer screen shows a Google search for "desktop background," but the results are limited and less visually striking. The farmer, now growing heirloom corn, looks worried, as the scarcity of GMO corn has led to a scarcity of vibrant desktop backgrounds.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In a Kansas cornfield, a farmer is holding an ear of colorful GMO corn, with vibrant hues of yellow, red, and blue. Nearby, a computer screen shows a Google search for "desktop background," but the results are limited and less visually striking. The farmer, now growing heirloom corn, looks worried, as the scarcity of GMO corn has led to a scarcity of vibrant desktop backgrounds. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image with a Cyberpunk style showing a scene in a Kansas cornfield. In the center, a fretful farmer is holding a vibrant ear of GMO corn with hues of yellow, red, and blue. At a distance, depict a computer screen displaying a Google search for "desktop background" with limited and dull results. The emphasis should be on the juxtaposition of the colorful GMO corn and the scarcity of visually striking desktop backgrounds.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Kansas caused desktop background (Google searches for 'desktop background') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Digital Cultures

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Hello, esteemed colleagues and fellow science enthusiasts! Today, we embark on a riveting journey into the whimsical world of agricultural biotechnology, digital aesthetics, and everything in between. Our study ventures into the heart of the Midwest, where the amber waves of genetically modified corn in Kansas sway in harmony with the ever-evolving cyber landscape. And what serendipitous connection do we uncover, you might wonder? Brace yourselves for a tale rife with statistics, corny puns, and a sprinkle of digital curiosity as we unravel the mysterious link between GMO corn and the timeless quest for the perfect 'desktop background'.

As researchers, we often find ourselves treading the hallowed ground of serious academia, where hypotheses are tested, statistics are dissected, and coffee consumption reaches peak levels. But amidst this scholarly fervor, we mustn't overlook the quirky facets of our studies, for sometimes, the most bizarre correlations lead to the most enlightening discoveries. So, gather 'round, statisticians and botanists alike, as we delve into the uncharted territory of GMOs and Google searches.

The beauty of interdisciplinary research lies in its ability to juxtapose seemingly disparate elements and tease out the hidden threads that bind them. What could be more unconventional, you ask, than entwining the genetic makeup of corn with the digital diversions of desktop wallpapers? It's a match made in statistical heaven, with just a pinch of absurdity and a dash of scientific intrigue.

But before we proceed, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this investigation. We're about to unpack a correlation between two realms so distinct, they might as well be from different planets - one rooted in the soil of agricultural innovation, the other surfing the binary waves of the internet. It's the stuff of statistical folklore, the kind that prompts bemused expressions and a few raised eyebrows at academic gatherings.

Through rigorous analysis and a sprinkle of statistical wizardry, we intend to illuminate the peculiar dance between GMO corn cultivation and the virtual pursuit of captivating desktop backgrounds. So, fasten your lab coats and ready your mouse clicks, as we journey into the labyrinthine network of statistical significance and scientific unexpectedness. Let the corny connections and digital dalliances commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hello, esteemed colleagues and fellow science enthusiasts! Today, we embark on a riveting journey into the whimsical world of agricultural biotechnology, digital aesthetics, and everything in between. Our study ventures into the heart of the Midwest, where the amber waves of genetically modified corn in Kansas sway in harmony with the ever-evolving cyber landscape. And what serendipitous connection do we uncover, you might wonder? Brace yourselves for a tale rife with statistics, corny puns, and a sprinkle of digital curiosity as we unravel the mysterious link between GMO corn and the timeless quest for the perfect 'desktop background'.
As researchers, we often find ourselves treading the hallowed ground of serious academia, where hypotheses are tested, statistics are dissected, and coffee consumption reaches peak levels. But amidst this scholarly fervor, we mustn't overlook the quirky facets of our studies, for sometimes, the most bizarre correlations lead to the most enlightening discoveries. So, gather 'round, statisticians and botanists alike, as we delve into the uncharted territory of GMOs and Google searches.
The beauty of interdisciplinary research lies in its ability to juxtapose seemingly disparate elements and tease out the hidden threads that bind them. What could be more unconventional, you ask, than entwining the genetic makeup of corn with the digital diversions of desktop wallpapers? It's a match made in statistical heaven, with just a pinch of absurdity and a dash of scientific intrigue.
But before we proceed, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this investigation. We're about to unpack a correlation between two realms so distinct, they might as well be from different planets - one rooted in the soil of agricultural innovation, the other surfing the binary waves of the internet. It's the stuff of statistical folklore, the kind that prompts bemused expressions and a few raised eyebrows at academic gatherings.
Through rigorous analysis and a sprinkle of statistical wizardry, we intend to illuminate the peculiar dance between GMO corn cultivation and the virtual pursuit of captivating desktop backgrounds. So, fasten your lab coats and ready your mouse clicks, as we journey into the labyrinthine network of statistical significance and scientific unexpectedness. Let the corny connections and digital dalliances commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and the realm of digital aesthetics has long been a subject of bewilderment and fascination. As we embark on this unconventional quest, we find ourselves drawing inspiration from a plethora of scholarly works that have paved the way for our whimsical exploration.

Smith et al. (2015) first delved into the intricacies of GMO usage in staple crops, providing a solid groundwork for understanding the agricultural landscape. Their findings laid the fertile soil for subsequent researchers to sow the seeds of curiosity in the field of GMO correlations. However, little did they anticipate the zany journey that awaited us as we ventured into the realm of internet searches for desktop background imagery.

Doe and Jones (2017) contributed to the discourse by examining the societal impacts of GMO cultivation, shedding light on public perceptions and economic repercussions. Their research provided a panoramic view of the cornfields of Kansas, but alas, they did not foresee the digital winds of change blowing through computer screens in search of the perfect backdrop.

As we tiptoe into the more eccentric dimensions of our investigation, we turn to non-fiction works that, at first glance, seem unrelated but harbor hidden connections. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan beckons us to ponder the multifaceted nature of our food systems, and as we contemplate the intricate web of GMOs, we can't help but wonder if our digital omnivores face a similar perplexity in their quest for the perfect desktop background.

In a more whimsical vein, the works of fiction also whisper tantalizing hints of relevance. "Neuromancer" by William Gibson unfolds a cyberpunk landscape that resonates with the digital escapades we are about to unravel. Could it be that the GMO cornfields of Kansas cast a hidden shadow in the neon-lit alleys of Gibson's dystopian future?

Drawing from unexpected sources, the board game "Agricola" serendipitously offers a playful nod to our agricultural underpinnings, while "The Sims" beckons us into a virtual world where even digital avatars seek the allure of diverse desktop backgrounds.

As we wade into this sea of peculiar connections, we find ourselves grappling with the uncanny convergence of two seemingly unrelated domains. But fear not, dear readers, for in our pursuit of knowledge, we shall cast aside the shackles of mundanity and embrace the whimsical in our quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hello, esteemed colleagues and fellow science enthusiasts! Today, we embark on a riveting journey into the whimsical world of agricultural biotechnology, digital aesthetics, and everything in between. Our study ventures into the heart of the Midwest, where the amber waves of genetically modified corn in Kansas sway in harmony with the ever-evolving cyber landscape. And what serendipitous connection do we uncover, you might wonder? Brace yourselves for a tale rife with statistics, corny puns, and a sprinkle of digital curiosity as we unravel the mysterious link between GMO corn and the timeless quest for the perfect 'desktop background'.
As researchers, we often find ourselves treading the hallowed ground of serious academia, where hypotheses are tested, statistics are dissected, and coffee consumption reaches peak levels. But amidst this scholarly fervor, we mustn't overlook the quirky facets of our studies, for sometimes, the most bizarre correlations lead to the most enlightening discoveries. So, gather 'round, statisticians and botanists alike, as we delve into the uncharted territory of GMOs and Google searches.
The beauty of interdisciplinary research lies in its ability to juxtapose seemingly disparate elements and tease out the hidden threads that bind them. What could be more unconventional, you ask, than entwining the genetic makeup of corn with the digital diversions of desktop wallpapers? It's a match made in statistical heaven, with just a pinch of absurdity and a dash of scientific intrigue.
But before we proceed, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this investigation. We're about to unpack a correlation between two realms so distinct, they might as well be from different planets - one rooted in the soil of agricultural innovation, the other surfing the binary waves of the internet. It's the stuff of statistical folklore, the kind that prompts bemused expressions and a few raised eyebrows at academic gatherings.
Through rigorous analysis and a sprinkle of statistical wizardry, we intend to illuminate the peculiar dance between GMO corn cultivation and the virtual pursuit of captivating desktop backgrounds. So, fasten your lab coats and ready your mouse clicks, as we journey into the labyrinthine network of statistical significance and scientific unexpectedness. Let the corny connections and digital dalliances commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic entanglement between genetically modified corn in the heartland of Kansas and the seemingly unrelated phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background', our research team embarked on a quest that tested the boundaries of scientific inquiry. With a blend of meticulous data collection, statistical acrobatics, and a dash of whimsy, our methodology aimed to shine a spotlight on this uncharted correlation.

Data Collection:

Our data collection journey began with a virtual trek through the digital fields of the USDA's extensive crop reports and records. We diligently harvested information on the adoption of GMO technology in corn cultivation across the sprawling landscapes of Kansas. A cornucopia of data points spanning from 2007 to 2023 was carefully plucked from the fertile electronic soil, providing a wealth of insight into the growth and proliferation of genetically modified corn in the sunflower state.

Now, to the digital realm where pixels and search queries intertwine – Google Trends became our compass in navigating the labyrinth of online curiosity. We meticulously recorded the ebb and flow of 'desktop background' searches, sifting through the virtual haystack to uncover patterns that could potentially intertwine with the GMO-laden cornfields of Kansas. The search trends, much like the stalks of corn in a gentle breeze, danced across our screens, revealing a digital narrative waiting to be deciphered.

Statistical Wizardry:

With our virtual bounties in hand, we harnessed the power of statistical paradigms to unveil the relationship between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual yearnings for visual adornments. Employing rigorous correlation analyses, regression modelling, and a penchant for delving into the unexpected, we sought to quantify the strength and direction of this peculiarity.

The tantalizing correlation coefficient, adorned with a virtual cape, stood proudly at 0.9576455, prompting gasps of astonishment and a few playful nudges amongst our team. Confronted with a p-value that gleefully danced below 0.01, we had to brace ourselves for the statistically significant nature of this pairing. These findings not only piqued our scientific curiosity but also elicited whispers of intrigue and bewilderment in the hallowed halls of academia.

The Interdisciplinary Tango:

Interdisciplinary research, much like a lively dance, thrives on the harmonious fusion of diverse elements. In our exploration of the peculiar connection between GMO corn and digital aesthetics, we embraced the unconventional and reveled in the whimsical. Our statistical tools became partners in this intricate tango, leading us through the convoluted steps of analysis and interpretation.

Throughout our methodology, we strived to blend the rigors of agricultural biotechnology with the playful allure of virtual escapades, showing that the synergy of science and curiosity can yield unexpected revelations. The interplay of variables, much like actors in a cosmic play, unfolded before our eyes, showcasing the vibrant tapestry of correlations that transcend traditional boundaries and dare to merge the unlikeliest of bedfellows.

In the following sections, we will unravel the implications of this spirited dalliance between GMO corn and 'desktop background' queries, shedding light on the implications and provoking pensive smiles along the way. As we continue our journey into the heart of this unforeseen correlation, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the delightful audacity of scientific exploration, where the unexpected breathes new life into the familiar and the corny connections harmonize with digital diversions in a symphony of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9576455, r-squared of 0.9170850, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Hello, esteemed colleagues and fellow science enthusiasts! Today, we embark on a riveting journey into the whimsical world of agricultural biotechnology, digital aesthetics, and everything in between. Our study ventures into the heart of the Midwest, where the amber waves of genetically modified corn in Kansas sway in harmony with the ever-evolving cyber landscape. And what serendipitous connection do we uncover, you might wonder? Brace yourselves for a tale rife with statistics, corny puns, and a sprinkle of digital curiosity as we unravel the mysterious link between GMO corn and the timeless quest for the perfect 'desktop background'.
As researchers, we often find ourselves treading the hallowed ground of serious academia, where hypotheses are tested, statistics are dissected, and coffee consumption reaches peak levels. But amidst this scholarly fervor, we mustn't overlook the quirky facets of our studies, for sometimes, the most bizarre correlations lead to the most enlightening discoveries. So, gather 'round, statisticians and botanists alike, as we delve into the uncharted territory of GMOs and Google searches.
The beauty of interdisciplinary research lies in its ability to juxtapose seemingly disparate elements and tease out the hidden threads that bind them. What could be more unconventional, you ask, than entwining the genetic makeup of corn with the digital diversions of desktop wallpapers? It's a match made in statistical heaven, with just a pinch of absurdity and a dash of scientific intrigue.
But before we proceed, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this investigation. We're about to unpack a correlation between two realms so distinct, they might as well be from different planets - one rooted in the soil of agricultural innovation, the other surfing the binary waves of the internet. It's the stuff of statistical folklore, the kind that prompts bemused expressions and a few raised eyebrows at academic gatherings.
Through rigorous analysis and a sprinkle of statistical wizardry, we intend to illuminate the peculiar dance between GMO corn cultivation and the virtual pursuit of captivating desktop backgrounds. So, fasten your lab coats and ready your mouse clicks, as we journey into the labyrinthine network of statistical significance and scientific unexpectedness. Let the corny connections and digital dalliances commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Kansas cornfields and Google searches for 'desktop background' have undoubtedly sprouted some intriguing findings! From 2007 to 2023, our data analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9576455, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9170850 further emphasizes the tight bond between GMO corn and the quest for the perfect computer backdrop in the digital realm. With a p-value less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this connection leaves us marveling at the whimsical interplay of agricultural innovation and cyber aesthetics.

Behold, behold - behold the magic of statistical analysis captured in Fig. 1! Behold, as we proudly present a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably close association between GMO usage in corn and the virtual yearning for picturesque desktop adornments. As the points on the scatterplot cluster tightly together in a harmonious embrace, it's as if the GMO corn and the desktop backgrounds are engaging in a clandestine waltz, whispering secrets of their peculiar kinship across the digital divide. Let this image serve as a testament to the fascinating union of nature and technology, a union that defies conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the data-driven dreamers.

Dear readers, in light of these results, we cannot help but ponder the profound implications of this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the subtle genetics of GMO corn are casting a spell on the digital whims of desktop users? Are the virtual landscapes of 'desktop background' searches silently echoing the verdant tapestries of GMO cornfields, yearning for a pixelated connection to their agricultural origins?

It is in moments like these that the scientific community is compelled to confront the endearing curiosity of research - for who would have thought that a seemingly incongruous duo such as GMO corn and 'desktop background' searches could engage in such a lively and statistically significant tango? Our findings not only highlight the agile nature of interdisciplinary explorations but also urge us to embrace the unexpected, the whimsical, and the delightfully surreal in our scholarly pursuits.

In conclusion, our study raises thought-provoking questions and ignites a spark of merriment in the realm of research, prompting us to view the sweet symphony of statistics and the charming quirk of nature through a playful lens. Let us continue to celebrate the colorful, the enigmatic, and the wondrous intersections that emerge from the captivating interplay of science and the delightful unknown.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and the realm of digital aesthetics has long been a subject of bewilderment and fascination. As we embark on this unconventional quest, we find ourselves drawing inspiration from a plethora of scholarly works that have paved the way for our whimsical exploration.
Smith et al. (2015) first delved into the intricacies of GMO usage in staple crops, providing a solid groundwork for understanding the agricultural landscape. Their findings laid the fertile soil for subsequent researchers to sow the seeds of curiosity in the field of GMO correlations. However, little did they anticipate the zany journey that awaited us as we ventured into the realm of internet searches for desktop background imagery.
Doe and Jones (2017) contributed to the discourse by examining the societal impacts of GMO cultivation, shedding light on public perceptions and economic repercussions. Their research provided a panoramic view of the cornfields of Kansas, but alas, they did not foresee the digital winds of change blowing through computer screens in search of the perfect backdrop.
As we tiptoe into the more eccentric dimensions of our investigation, we turn to non-fiction works that, at first glance, seem unrelated but harbor hidden connections. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan beckons us to ponder the multifaceted nature of our food systems, and as we contemplate the intricate web of GMOs, we can't help but wonder if our digital omnivores face a similar perplexity in their quest for the perfect desktop background.
In a more whimsical vein, the works of fiction also whisper tantalizing hints of relevance. "Neuromancer" by William Gibson unfolds a cyberpunk landscape that resonates with the digital escapades we are about to unravel. Could it be that the GMO cornfields of Kansas cast a hidden shadow in the neon-lit alleys of Gibson's dystopian future?
Drawing from unexpected sources, the board game "Agricola" serendipitously offers a playful nod to our agricultural underpinnings, while "The Sims" beckons us into a virtual world where even digital avatars seek the allure of diverse desktop backgrounds.
As we wade into this sea of peculiar connections, we find ourselves grappling with the uncanny convergence of two seemingly unrelated domains. But fear not, dear readers, for in our pursuit of knowledge, we shall cast aside the shackles of mundanity and embrace the whimsical in our quest for understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Kansas cornfields and Google searches for 'desktop background' have undoubtedly sprouted some intriguing findings! From 2007 to 2023, our data analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9576455, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9170850 further emphasizes the tight bond between GMO corn and the quest for the perfect computer backdrop in the digital realm. With a p-value less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this connection leaves us marveling at the whimsical interplay of agricultural innovation and cyber aesthetics.
Behold, behold - behold the magic of statistical analysis captured in Fig. 1! Behold, as we proudly present a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably close association between GMO usage in corn and the virtual yearning for picturesque desktop adornments. As the points on the scatterplot cluster tightly together in a harmonious embrace, it's as if the GMO corn and the desktop backgrounds are engaging in a clandestine waltz, whispering secrets of their peculiar kinship across the digital divide. Let this image serve as a testament to the fascinating union of nature and technology, a union that defies conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the data-driven dreamers.
Dear readers, in light of these results, we cannot help but ponder the profound implications of this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the subtle genetics of GMO corn are casting a spell on the digital whims of desktop users? Are the virtual landscapes of 'desktop background' searches silently echoing the verdant tapestries of GMO cornfields, yearning for a pixelated connection to their agricultural origins?
It is in moments like these that the scientific community is compelled to confront the endearing curiosity of research - for who would have thought that a seemingly incongruous duo such as GMO corn and 'desktop background' searches could engage in such a lively and statistically significant tango? Our findings not only highlight the agile nature of interdisciplinary explorations but also urge us to embrace the unexpected, the whimsical, and the delightfully surreal in our scholarly pursuits.
In conclusion, our study raises thought-provoking questions and ignites a spark of merriment in the realm of research, prompting us to view the sweet symphony of statistics and the charming quirk of nature through a playful lens. Let us continue to celebrate the colorful, the enigmatic, and the wondrous intersections that emerge from the captivating interplay of science and the delightful unknown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a fascinating association between genetically modified corn in Kansas and the pursuit of attractive desktop backgrounds on the internet. The findings not only corroborated previous research on the societal impacts of GMO cultivation but also pointed to a virtual twist in the cornfield saga. It’s like the GMO corn whispered to the computer screens, "Ear’s" looking at you, kid!

The correlation we discovered aligns with Smith et al.’s work, which laid the groundwork for understanding GMO usage in staple crops. Our results, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455, reveal a bond stronger than the forces holding protons together. It's like the corn and desktop backgrounds are secretly BFFs, sharing a kernel of truth in their digital connection. This tight bond, supported by a p-value less than 0.01, highlights a statistically significant relationship that even the most skeptical statistician must acknowledge.

Embracing the unexpected, our findings echo quirky connections hinted at in Gibson’s "Neuromancer." Just as the cyberpunk landscape resonates with our exploration, it appears the virtual world scours the digital fields for a different kind of ‘crop’. Could it be that the code of GMO seeds sows the digital fields with inspiration? Maybe, just maybe, our digital omnivores are seeking a diverse diet of virtual landscapes akin to the agricultural diversity invoked by "The Omnivore's Dilemma."

As we ponder the potential reasons behind the correlation, we are left to wonder whether the allure of the picturesque cornfields is seeping into the virtual world, rendering computer screens reminiscent of Kansas farms. Or perhaps, just like the twists and turns of a corn maze, the link between GMO corn and picturesque desktop backgrounds leads us down a convoluted path of inquiry and fascination, proving that even the most unexpected correlations can lay the seeds for delightful discoveries.

Our interdisciplinary expedition not only highlights the whimsical nature of research but also draws attention to the unexpected and surreal intersections that emerge when science and statistics engage in a lighthearted tango. Like star-crossed lovers meeting in the night, the swirling dance of GMO corn and desktop backgrounds captures our imagination and underscores the joy of uncovering unexpected connections in the labyrinthine expanse of research. Let us raise a toast to the delightful complexities of scientific inquiry and continue to embrace the playful spirit that infuses our scholarly pursuits. After all, who says science can't be kernel of fun?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Hello, esteemed colleagues and fellow science enthusiasts! Today, we embark on a riveting journey into the whimsical world of agricultural biotechnology, digital aesthetics, and everything in between. Our study ventures into the heart of the Midwest, where the amber waves of genetically modified corn in Kansas sway in harmony with the ever-evolving cyber landscape. And what serendipitous connection do we uncover, you might wonder? Brace yourselves for a tale rife with statistics, corny puns, and a sprinkle of digital curiosity as we unravel the mysterious link between GMO corn and the timeless quest for the perfect 'desktop background'.
As researchers, we often find ourselves treading the hallowed ground of serious academia, where hypotheses are tested, statistics are dissected, and coffee consumption reaches peak levels. But amidst this scholarly fervor, we mustn't overlook the quirky facets of our studies, for sometimes, the most bizarre correlations lead to the most enlightening discoveries. So, gather 'round, statisticians and botanists alike, as we delve into the uncharted territory of GMOs and Google searches.
The beauty of interdisciplinary research lies in its ability to juxtapose seemingly disparate elements and tease out the hidden threads that bind them. What could be more unconventional, you ask, than entwining the genetic makeup of corn with the digital diversions of desktop wallpapers? It's a match made in statistical heaven, with just a pinch of absurdity and a dash of scientific intrigue.
But before we proceed, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this investigation. We're about to unpack a correlation between two realms so distinct, they might as well be from different planets - one rooted in the soil of agricultural innovation, the other surfing the binary waves of the internet. It's the stuff of statistical folklore, the kind that prompts bemused expressions and a few raised eyebrows at academic gatherings.
Through rigorous analysis and a sprinkle of statistical wizardry, we intend to illuminate the peculiar dance between GMO corn cultivation and the virtual pursuit of captivating desktop backgrounds. So, fasten your lab coats and ready your mouse clicks, as we journey into the labyrinthine network of statistical significance and scientific unexpectedness. Let the corny connections and digital dalliances commence!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Kansas cornfields and Google searches for 'desktop background' have undoubtedly sprouted some intriguing findings! From 2007 to 2023, our data analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9576455, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9170850 further emphasizes the tight bond between GMO corn and the quest for the perfect computer backdrop in the digital realm. With a p-value less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this connection leaves us marveling at the whimsical interplay of agricultural innovation and cyber aesthetics.
Behold, behold - behold the magic of statistical analysis captured in Fig. 1! Behold, as we proudly present a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably close association between GMO usage in corn and the virtual yearning for picturesque desktop adornments. As the points on the scatterplot cluster tightly together in a harmonious embrace, it's as if the GMO corn and the desktop backgrounds are engaging in a clandestine waltz, whispering secrets of their peculiar kinship across the digital divide. Let this image serve as a testament to the fascinating union of nature and technology, a union that defies conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of the data-driven dreamers.
Dear readers, in light of these results, we cannot help but ponder the profound implications of this unexpected correlation. Could it be that the subtle genetics of GMO corn are casting a spell on the digital whims of desktop users? Are the virtual landscapes of 'desktop background' searches silently echoing the verdant tapestries of GMO cornfields, yearning for a pixelated connection to their agricultural origins?
It is in moments like these that the scientific community is compelled to confront the endearing curiosity of research - for who would have thought that a seemingly incongruous duo such as GMO corn and 'desktop background' searches could engage in such a lively and statistically significant tango? Our findings not only highlight the agile nature of interdisciplinary explorations but also urge us to embrace the unexpected, the whimsical, and the delightfully surreal in our scholarly pursuits.
In conclusion, our study raises thought-provoking questions and ignites a spark of merriment in the realm of research, prompting us to view the sweet symphony of statistics and the charming quirk of nature through a playful lens. Let us continue to celebrate the colorful, the enigmatic, and the wondrous intersections that emerge from the captivating interplay of science and the delightful unknown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As our study draws to a close, we find ourselves marveling at the magical dance of statistics and agricultural enigmas. Who would have thought that genetically modified corn in Kansas and the search for the perfect 'desktop background' could engage in such a compelling statistical tango? It's a testament to the whimsical nature of interdisciplinary exploration, where science and digital dalliances converge in a glorious display of statistical significance.

Our findings not only provoke scientific curiosity but also tickle the fancy of the data-driven dreamers. The statistical significance of the correlation between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments leaves us pondering the agricultural roots of digital aesthetics. Could the pixelated vistas of computer wallpapers be silently yearning for a connection to their agrarian origins, much like a virtual ode to our corny companions in Kansas?

In the realm of research, it's crucial to embrace the unexpected, the whimsical, and the delightfully surreal. Our study not only sheds light on an uncanny correlation but also proves that, in the labyrinth of statistics, even the most incongruous duos can partake in a statistically significant waltz. It's a gentle reminder that the scientific journey is as much about embracing the colorful, the enigmatic, and the wondrous intersections as it is about uncovering empirical truths.

And so, dear colleagues, it is with a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical stardust that we conclude our investigation into the curious connection between GMO corn and 'desktop background' searches. Let this study stand as a testament to the joyous interplay of science and the unexpected, and may it inspire future researchers to explore the quirky, the unconventional, and the delightfully whimsical in our scholarly pursuits.

In the spirit of statistical merriment, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Let the mysteries of GMO corn and digital aesthetics continue to enchant us from afar, for their delightful connection has been unraveled in the most statistically delightful manner possible.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Digital Cultures


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agri-Tech Innovations and Internet Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Corny Connections: Genetically Modified Corn in Kansas and the Curious Case of Google Searches for 'Desktop Background' with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the perplexing and somewhat surreal realm of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in the sunflower state of Kansas and the peculiar phenomenon of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Through extensive analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9576455 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2023. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong linkage between GMO usage in corn fields and the virtual quest for scenic desktop adornments. The implications of this discovery elicit both giggles and head-scratching, raising the question: Are GMOs sprouting new interests in digital aesthetics, or are screensavers nostalgically yearning for the agrarian past? This paper not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also highlights the vibrant and whimsical nature of interdisciplinary research.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified corn, Kansas, GMO usage, USDA data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, desktop background searches, digital aesthetics, screensavers, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Kansas that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Kansas

Google searches for 'desktop background'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'desktop background' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'desktop background'

Correlation r = 0.9576455 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9170850 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'desktop background') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Kansas) over the 17 years from 2007 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-9. 0.0000000016327607105313193000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 612,459,617 random variables You don't actually need 612 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Kansas (GMO corn %)36302928221915181212151012118128
Google searches for 'desktop background' (Rel. search volume)81.833386.575.333366.166760.333354.7546.166741.916738.833330.583326.7523.916722.416724.752022.2520.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([36,30,29,28,22,19,15,18,12,12,15,10,12,11,8,12,8,])
array_2 = np.array([81.8333,86.5,75.3333,66.1667,60.3333,54.75,46.1667,41.9167,38.8333,30.5833,26.75,23.9167,22.4167,24.75,20,22.25,20.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'desktop background'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3204 · Black Variable ID: 728 · Red Variable ID: 1462
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0