about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,188 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and the second variable is Google searches for 'desktop background'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the ranks of pipelayers in New Mexico dwindled, there was a noticeable ripple effect on the availability of PVC pipes. This shortage inadvertently led to a decrease in the production of picture frames, prompting a nationwide scarcity of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds. Remember, when it comes to internet searches, sometimes the pipeline to results isn't as straightforward as we think!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of the New Mexico desert with a row of pipelayers connecting internet cables stretching across the horizon. In the foreground, a giant Google search bar is displayed, with the 'desktop background' search term getting smaller and smaller as the internet speed decreases. The sky should be clear and the landscape should showcase the desert's natural beauty. Keep the focus on the pipelayers and the diminishing search term in the Google search bar to emphasize the theme of internet connectivity and speed. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami A Discovery magazine cover image a funny image you would see on reddit Voxel art Futuristic
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background', in the following situation: because as the number of pipelayers in New Mexico decreases, there are fewer people laying the pipe for internet connections, leading to slower internet speeds. With slower internet, people are less likely to spend time searching for desktop backgrounds, thus causing a decrease in Google searches for 'desktop background.'. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The New Mexico desert with a row of pipelayers working hard to connect internet cables stretches across the horizon. Alongside, a giant Google search bar is displayed, with the 'desktop background' search term getting smaller and smaller as the internet speed decreases.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: The New Mexico desert with a row of pipelayers working hard to connect internet cables stretches across the horizon. Alongside, a giant Google search bar is displayed, with the 'desktop background' search term getting smaller and smaller as the internet speed decreases. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of the New Mexico desert with a row of pipelayers connecting internet cables stretching across the horizon. In the foreground, a giant Google search bar is displayed, with the 'desktop background' search term getting smaller and smaller as the internet speed decreases. The sky should be clear and the landscape should showcase the desert's natural beauty. Keep the focus on the pipelayers and the diminishing search term in the Google search bar to emphasize the theme of internet connectivity and speed.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of pipelayers in New Mexico caused desktop background (Google searches for 'desktop background') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

The Journal of Contemporary Ethnography and Digital Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of labor statistics and online search behaviors has long been an area of interest for researchers aiming to uncover unexpected connections and insights. In the realm of New Mexico's labor market and the digital realm of desktop customization, our investigation has led to a discovery that is as surprising as finding a beaver in an internet café – a robust correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'.

This revelation has prompted a great deal of curiosity and raised many questions. How could the occupation of pipelaying be linked to the seemingly unrelated domain of desktop background searches? Could there be a deep, underground connection that has eluded our understanding thus far? It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the internet – where unassuming job data meets the virtual world in unexpected ways.

As we delved into the data, the correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables emerged with a strength that could rival the pipelines themselves. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that had us pipe-dreaming about new possibilities, with a p-value that sent a clear message: this connection is not mere happenstance. Perhaps, in the quirky world of data analysis, the most peculiar associations can prove to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of labor statistics and online search behaviors has long been an area of interest for researchers aiming to uncover unexpected connections and insights. In the realm of New Mexico's labor market and the digital realm of desktop customization, our investigation has led to a discovery that is as surprising as finding a beaver in an internet café – a robust correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'.
This revelation has prompted a great deal of curiosity and raised many questions. How could the occupation of pipelaying be linked to the seemingly unrelated domain of desktop background searches? Could there be a deep, underground connection that has eluded our understanding thus far? It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the internet – where unassuming job data meets the virtual world in unexpected ways.
As we delved into the data, the correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables emerged with a strength that could rival the pipelines themselves. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that had us pipe-dreaming about new possibilities, with a p-value that sent a clear message: this connection is not mere happenstance. Perhaps, in the quirky world of data analysis, the most peculiar associations can prove to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) examine the labor market dynamics in New Mexico, providing a comprehensive analysis of various occupations, including pipelayers. Their work sheds light on the employment trends and demographic characteristics of pipelayers in the region. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) conduct a detailed investigation into online search patterns, uncovering the factors influencing keyword queries related to desktop customization. These studies offer valuable insights into the realms of labor economics and digital behavior, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected correlation between pipelayers and 'desktop background' searches.

Stepping beyond traditional research avenues, our inquiry draws inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Pipeline: A Journey of Labor and Landscape" by X. Y. Z. This illuminating book delves into the cultural significance of labor practices, inviting readers to contemplate the intertwined relationship between physical labor and the environment. On the digital front, "The Art of Desktop Customization" by A. B. C. provides a detailed exploration of the intricacies of personalizing digital interfaces, reflecting the diverse interests and preferences of computer users.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, literary works such as "Pipes of Destiny" by J. K. Rowling and "The Desktop Dilemma" by Stephen King draw on imaginative narratives that, albeit unrelated to our research, spark the imagination in unexpected ways. Perhaps, in a parallel universe, pipelayers and desktop backgrounds populate the pages of these fantastical tales, weaving a narrative that transcends the boundaries of reality.

Beyond the conventional academic sources, our quest for understanding took an unconventional turn as we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of pop culture, including deciphering the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts and deciphering the enigmatic musings of fortune cookies. While these endeavors may seem light-hearted, they serve as a testament to our dedication to uncovering knowledge from the unlikeliest of sources.

As we immerse ourselves in the literature and beyond, we are reminded of the intrinsic curiosity that drives research and the unexpected avenues it can lead us down. The pursuit of knowledge is akin to navigating a maze of interconnected pipelines, where each twist and turn unravels new possibilities and unforeseen connections. It is within this labyrinth of understanding that the most peculiar associations often coax a smile and, occasionally, a well-timed dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of labor statistics and online search behaviors has long been an area of interest for researchers aiming to uncover unexpected connections and insights. In the realm of New Mexico's labor market and the digital realm of desktop customization, our investigation has led to a discovery that is as surprising as finding a beaver in an internet café – a robust correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'.
This revelation has prompted a great deal of curiosity and raised many questions. How could the occupation of pipelaying be linked to the seemingly unrelated domain of desktop background searches? Could there be a deep, underground connection that has eluded our understanding thus far? It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the internet – where unassuming job data meets the virtual world in unexpected ways.
As we delved into the data, the correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables emerged with a strength that could rival the pipelines themselves. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that had us pipe-dreaming about new possibilities, with a p-value that sent a clear message: this connection is not mere happenstance. Perhaps, in the quirky world of data analysis, the most peculiar associations can prove to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the enigmatic connection between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background', our research team employed a mix of quantitative methods that could rival the intricate plumbing systems in the Land of Enchantment.

First, we gathered labor market data on the employment of pipelayers in New Mexico from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, tracking the annual count from 2007 through 2022. The data collection process was as meticulous as a plumber fixing a leak, ensuring that no figurative pipes were left uncapped in our dataset.

Simultaneously, we turned to the data trove of Google Trends, extracting information on the frequency of searches for 'desktop background' within the same timeframe. This involved sifting through volumes of digital footprints, akin to searching for a needle in a web of interconnected haystacks.

Once we had amassed both sets of data, we channeled our statistical prowess to conduct a rigorous analysis. We explored the relationship between the number of pipelayers and Google searches for 'desktop background' utilizing a series of sophisticated techniques that were as complex as arranging a maze of pipes beneath the streets of Albuquerque.

Drawing from the reservoir of statistical methods, we calculated the correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship. The analysis left no stone unturned, evaluating the degree to which changes in pipelayer employment coincided with shifts in desktop background searches. To ensure thoroughness, we verified our findings using robust regression models, ensuring that our results didn't spring a leak under scrutiny.

In addition, we interrogated the significance of our findings by analyzing the p-value derived from our statistical testing. We applied a range of hypothesis tests to determine the likelihood of the observed correlation occurring purely by chance, leaving no room for doubt like a tightly sealed pipe.

Throughout this process, we maintained a critical eye and rigor that would make any plumber proud, cross-checking our findings and analyses with the meticulous care of examining piping blueprints.

In the end, our research methodology pumped new life into the study of unexpected correlations, proving that even the most unlikely connections can flow seamlessly into the tapestry of research. And as it turns out, the level of pipelayer employment in New Mexico does indeed exhibit a correlation with Google searches for 'desktop background' that is as striking as a perfectly welded joint.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9754659, r-squared of 0.9515336, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of labor statistics and online search behaviors has long been an area of interest for researchers aiming to uncover unexpected connections and insights. In the realm of New Mexico's labor market and the digital realm of desktop customization, our investigation has led to a discovery that is as surprising as finding a beaver in an internet café – a robust correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'.
This revelation has prompted a great deal of curiosity and raised many questions. How could the occupation of pipelaying be linked to the seemingly unrelated domain of desktop background searches? Could there be a deep, underground connection that has eluded our understanding thus far? It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the internet – where unassuming job data meets the virtual world in unexpected ways.
As we delved into the data, the correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables emerged with a strength that could rival the pipelines themselves. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that had us pipe-dreaming about new possibilities, with a p-value that sent a clear message: this connection is not mere happenstance. Perhaps, in the quirky world of data analysis, the most peculiar associations can prove to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and the volume of Google searches for 'desktop background'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and an r-squared value of 0.9515336 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this association.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the number of pipelayers and Google searches for 'desktop background' over the period from 2007 to 2022. The data points form a clear upward trend, reflecting the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated factors.

Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the connection between pipelayers and desktop backgrounds, the data speaks for itself in revealing a surprising relationship. It's a bit like finding a mouse in your pocket, unexpected but undeniably present. The correlation identified in this study may seem as outlandish as a beaver playing chess, yet it underscores the need to explore unconventional relationships within the realm of data analysis.

The findings not only emphasize the significance of examining unanticipated correlations but also provide an opportunity to appreciate the subtle and often humorous intricacies of human behavior and digital interests. Uncovering this peculiar linkage between labor market dynamics and online preferences is a testament to the enlightening discoveries that can arise from a comprehensive analysis of diverse datasets. In the realm of research, it seems that even the most unexpected connections have the potential to pave the way for intriguing insights and novel discoveries.

As we continue to contemplate the implications of this unexpected correlation, it is clear that there is much more to be unearthed and examined within the vast landscape of data analysis. After all, in the world of research, the most unconventional findings often turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) examine the labor market dynamics in New Mexico, providing a comprehensive analysis of various occupations, including pipelayers. Their work sheds light on the employment trends and demographic characteristics of pipelayers in the region. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) conduct a detailed investigation into online search patterns, uncovering the factors influencing keyword queries related to desktop customization. These studies offer valuable insights into the realms of labor economics and digital behavior, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected correlation between pipelayers and 'desktop background' searches.
Stepping beyond traditional research avenues, our inquiry draws inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Pipeline: A Journey of Labor and Landscape" by X. Y. Z. This illuminating book delves into the cultural significance of labor practices, inviting readers to contemplate the intertwined relationship between physical labor and the environment. On the digital front, "The Art of Desktop Customization" by A. B. C. provides a detailed exploration of the intricacies of personalizing digital interfaces, reflecting the diverse interests and preferences of computer users.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, literary works such as "Pipes of Destiny" by J. K. Rowling and "The Desktop Dilemma" by Stephen King draw on imaginative narratives that, albeit unrelated to our research, spark the imagination in unexpected ways. Perhaps, in a parallel universe, pipelayers and desktop backgrounds populate the pages of these fantastical tales, weaving a narrative that transcends the boundaries of reality.
Beyond the conventional academic sources, our quest for understanding took an unconventional turn as we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of pop culture, including deciphering the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts and deciphering the enigmatic musings of fortune cookies. While these endeavors may seem light-hearted, they serve as a testament to our dedication to uncovering knowledge from the unlikeliest of sources.
As we immerse ourselves in the literature and beyond, we are reminded of the intrinsic curiosity that drives research and the unexpected avenues it can lead us down. The pursuit of knowledge is akin to navigating a maze of interconnected pipelines, where each twist and turn unravels new possibilities and unforeseen connections. It is within this labyrinth of understanding that the most peculiar associations often coax a smile and, occasionally, a well-timed dad joke.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and the volume of Google searches for 'desktop background'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and an r-squared value of 0.9515336 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this association.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the number of pipelayers and Google searches for 'desktop background' over the period from 2007 to 2022. The data points form a clear upward trend, reflecting the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated factors.
Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the connection between pipelayers and desktop backgrounds, the data speaks for itself in revealing a surprising relationship. It's a bit like finding a mouse in your pocket, unexpected but undeniably present. The correlation identified in this study may seem as outlandish as a beaver playing chess, yet it underscores the need to explore unconventional relationships within the realm of data analysis.
The findings not only emphasize the significance of examining unanticipated correlations but also provide an opportunity to appreciate the subtle and often humorous intricacies of human behavior and digital interests. Uncovering this peculiar linkage between labor market dynamics and online preferences is a testament to the enlightening discoveries that can arise from a comprehensive analysis of diverse datasets. In the realm of research, it seems that even the most unexpected connections have the potential to pave the way for intriguing insights and novel discoveries.
As we continue to contemplate the implications of this unexpected correlation, it is clear that there is much more to be unearthed and examined within the vast landscape of data analysis. After all, in the world of research, the most unconventional findings often turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background' has raised eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and enthusiasts alike. While the initial discovery may sound as perplexing as finding a cell phone in a cereal box, our results substantiate and expand upon prior research, confirming the presence of a robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

Smith and Doe's (2015) examination of labor market dynamics in New Mexico set the stage for our investigation, providing valuable insight into the employment trends and demographic characteristics of pipelayers in the region. Our findings align with their conclusions, highlighting the importance of considering occupational dynamics in understanding digital behavior. As Jones et al. (2018) delved into online search patterns related to desktop customization, our research builds upon their work, unveiling a surprising link between digital preferences and the labor market. It's as if our findings have laid the pipe for future research to flow right through.

Stepping beyond traditional research avenues, our study echoes the cultural significance of labor practices portrayed in "The Pipeline: A Journey of Labor and Landscape" by X. Y. Z. Our findings emphasize the interconnectedness of labor and digital interests, just as the book underscores the integral relationship between physical labor and the environment. In a similar vein, the digital exploration documented in "The Art of Desktop Customization" by A. B. C. resonates with our discoveries, highlighting the intricate nature of digital personalization and its unexpected ties to labor dynamics. It's as though our research has patched the leak in understanding the intricate tapestry of labor and digital preferences.

Our whimsical excursion through the annals of pop culture and the world of fiction has proven unexpectedly fruitful, shedding light on the unanticipated connections that can emerge from unconventional sources. The humorous moments and unforeseen tangents encountered on this journey have subtly woven themselves into our findings, demonstrating the unpredictable and often comical nature of research. It's as if we've dived into a rabbit hole and emerged with a valuable treasure trove of knowledge, proving that even the most whimsical detours can lead to groundbreaking discoveries.

Our diligently conducted statistical analysis, akin to a carefully laid pipeline, has unveiled a compelling correlation between pipelayers and desktop backgrounds, emphasizing the need to explore unconventional relationships within the realm of data analysis. The statistical significance of this association and its reflective nature not only showcase the unexpected humor of our findings but also underscore the potential for unconventional, yet enlightening, discoveries within the depths of data. It's as if we've struck oil within the labyrinth of data analysis, unearthing a valuable resource that challenges conventional wisdom and inspires further inquiry.

In the realm of research, our unexpected correlation between pipelayers and desktop background searches serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous nature of discovery and the intricate web of connections waiting to be unraveled. As we continue to explore the implications of this peculiar relationship, it becomes clear that the most unlikely connections can lead to the most thought-provoking insights. Our research stands as a testament to the whimsical and often humorous journey of discovery, demonstrating that even the most outlandish connections may hold the key to groundbreaking revelations.

Now, time to pipe down and let the data speak for itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.

The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.

Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of labor statistics and online search behaviors has long been an area of interest for researchers aiming to uncover unexpected connections and insights. In the realm of New Mexico's labor market and the digital realm of desktop customization, our investigation has led to a discovery that is as surprising as finding a beaver in an internet café – a robust correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'.
This revelation has prompted a great deal of curiosity and raised many questions. How could the occupation of pipelaying be linked to the seemingly unrelated domain of desktop background searches? Could there be a deep, underground connection that has eluded our understanding thus far? It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the internet – where unassuming job data meets the virtual world in unexpected ways.
As we delved into the data, the correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables emerged with a strength that could rival the pipelines themselves. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that had us pipe-dreaming about new possibilities, with a p-value that sent a clear message: this connection is not mere happenstance. Perhaps, in the quirky world of data analysis, the most peculiar associations can prove to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of pipelayers employed in New Mexico and the volume of Google searches for 'desktop background'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and an r-squared value of 0.9515336 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this association.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the number of pipelayers and Google searches for 'desktop background' over the period from 2007 to 2022. The data points form a clear upward trend, reflecting the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated factors.
Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the connection between pipelayers and desktop backgrounds, the data speaks for itself in revealing a surprising relationship. It's a bit like finding a mouse in your pocket, unexpected but undeniably present. The correlation identified in this study may seem as outlandish as a beaver playing chess, yet it underscores the need to explore unconventional relationships within the realm of data analysis.
The findings not only emphasize the significance of examining unanticipated correlations but also provide an opportunity to appreciate the subtle and often humorous intricacies of human behavior and digital interests. Uncovering this peculiar linkage between labor market dynamics and online preferences is a testament to the enlightening discoveries that can arise from a comprehensive analysis of diverse datasets. In the realm of research, it seems that even the most unexpected connections have the potential to pave the way for intriguing insights and novel discoveries.
As we continue to contemplate the implications of this unexpected correlation, it is clear that there is much more to be unearthed and examined within the vast landscape of data analysis. After all, in the world of research, the most unconventional findings often turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a surprising and robust correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and the volume of Google searches for 'desktop background', akin to finding a deer browsing computer software. Despite its initial absurdity, the statistical analysis has substantiated this unanticipated relationship, highlighting the need for further exploration into peculiar data connections.

The presence of such a strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables serves as a reminder that in the realm of research, the most unexpected findings can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking insights. As we reflect on the unlikely association between labor market dynamics and digital preferences, we are reminded that sometimes the most offbeat connections can lead to the unearthing of intriguing insights, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in unexpected places.

However, despite the fascinating nature and humorous undertones of this correlation, it seems we have finally reached the end of our research journey on this particular topic. With confidence similar to a plumber's ability to fix any leak, we assert that further research in this specific area is unnecessary. The pipe dream has become a reality, and it's time to turn off the faucet on this particular inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Contemporary Ethnography and Digital Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ethnographic Studies in Technology and Society


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Digging into Data: The Novel Relationship Between Pipelayers in New Mexico and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background' with an abstract of The intersection of labor statistics and internet search trends has offered a surprising revelation: a striking correlation between the number of pipelayers in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. While this connection may seem as improbable as a dancing turkey, our research team conducted a thorough analysis using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9754659 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning 2007 to 2022.
The humorous part of this unexpected connection might seem like a pipe dream, but the relationship remains robust and prompts further investigation. Our findings shed light on the curious nature of human behavior and the intricate web of digital interests. One might say that delving into labor data and Google queries has unearthed an amusing pipeline to desktop decoration. This link may sound like a bit of a pipe bomb, although it pales in comparison to discovering the root cause of the association.
Overall, our research highlights the need to dig deeper into seemingly incongruous datasets, uncovering unexpected correlations that tickle the funny bone while provoking thoughtful reflection. As we continue to plumb the depths of data, we are reminded that sometimes the most captivating insights can emerge from the most unlikely sources. After all, who would have thought that the number of pipelayers in New Mexico could correlate with digital wallpaper interests? It seems that in the world of research, even the most offbeat connections can turn out to be the pipe dream that leads to groundbreaking discoveries.

ChatGPT:

pipelayers New Mexico, Google searches desktop background, correlation labor statistics Google searches, Bureau of Labor Statistics data analysis, correlation coefficient pipelayers Google searches, humorous data correlations, unexpected data connections, human behavior digital interests, incongruous datasets correlations, mining unusual data connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of pipelayers in New Mexico
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of pipelayers in New Mexico
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of pipelayers in New Mexico

Google searches for 'desktop background'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'desktop background' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'desktop background'

Correlation r = 0.9754659 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9515336 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'desktop background') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of pipelayers in New Mexico) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-10. 0.0000000001344700756228114000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,436,598,778 random variables You don't actually need 7 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of pipelayers in New Mexico (Pipelayers)61071055047030029024024013011090401101304080
Google searches for 'desktop background' (Rel. search volume)81.833386.575.333366.166760.333354.7546.166741.916738.833330.583326.7523.916722.416724.752022.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([610,710,550,470,300,290,240,240,130,110,90,40,110,130,40,80,])
array_2 = np.array([81.8333,86.5,75.3333,66.1667,60.3333,54.75,46.1667,41.9167,38.8333,30.5833,26.75,23.9167,22.4167,24.75,20,22.25,])
array_1_name = "The number of pipelayers in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'desktop background'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3188 · Black Variable ID: 11931 · Red Variable ID: 1462
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0