about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,050 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is The number of postmasters in North Dakota.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO corn dwindled, so did the size of the corn, leading to smaller corn shipments. The postmasters, accustomed to handling larger volumes of mail for the bigger GMO corn farms, found themselves with a lot less to sort. With their workload reduced, many postmasters decided to pursue their long-lost dreams of becoming professional cheese sculptors instead.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] Create an image of a vast, vibrant cornfield in North Dakota. The bright sun illuminates rows of tall, swaying corn stalks, casting dramatic shadows across the field. In the foreground, a sign proudly states "GMO-Free Corn," drawing attention to the natural purity of the environment. Amidst the corn stalks, a group of animated corn husks are shown huddled together, engaging in lively interactions. Some are passing envelopes and packages to one another, while others appear to be engaged in conversation or various activities. Their animated gestures and expressions convey a sense of community and activity within the cornfield. In the distance, a small, cozy post office stands abandoned, its architecture reflecting a sense of nostalgia and antiquity. The faded and weathered sign on the building communicates a sense of history and decline, symbolizing the obsolete nature of traditional postal services in the modern age. The image should capture the contrast between the organic liveliness of the cornfield and the nostalgic abandonment of the post office, creating a visually compelling scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Sci-fi fantacy a meme Cutsy graphics inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: Inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota, in the following situation: As GMO use decreased, corn husks gained sentience and started delivering mail, eliminating the need for human postmasters! The GMO-free corn became so efficient at mail delivery that postmasters in North Dakota became obsolete, leading to their decrease in numbers.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in North Dakota, the sun shines down on rows of tall, swaying corn stalks. A sign at the edge of the field proudly states "GMO-Free Corn" while a group of corn husks seems to be huddled together, animatedly passing envelopes and packages to one another. In the distance, a small, cozy post office stands abandoned, its sign faded and weathered. The absence of postmasters is evident as the once bustling building sits empty, a clear symbol of the obsolete profession.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in North Dakota, the sun shines down on rows of tall, swaying corn stalks. A sign at the edge of the field proudly states "GMO-Free Corn" while a group of corn husks seems to be huddled together, animatedly passing envelopes and packages to one another. In the distance, a small, cozy post office stands abandoned, its sign faded and weathered. The absence of postmasters is evident as the once bustling building sits empty, a clear symbol of the obsolete profession. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] Create an image of a vast, vibrant cornfield in North Dakota. The bright sun illuminates rows of tall, swaying corn stalks, casting dramatic shadows across the field. In the foreground, a sign proudly states "GMO-Free Corn," drawing attention to the natural purity of the environment. Amidst the corn stalks, a group of animated corn husks are shown huddled together, engaging in lively interactions. Some are passing envelopes and packages to one another, while others appear to be engaged in conversation or various activities. Their animated gestures and expressions convey a sense of community and activity within the cornfield. In the distance, a small, cozy post office stands abandoned, its architecture reflecting a sense of nostalgia and antiquity. The faded and weathered sign on the building communicates a sense of history and decline, symbolizing the obsolete nature of traditional postal services in the modern age. The image should capture the contrast between the organic liveliness of the cornfield and the nostalgic abandonment of the post office, creating a visually compelling scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused The number of postmasters in North Dakota to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of research often uncovers unexpected connections, much like discovering a hidden nest of baby chicks among rows of corn. In this paper, we delve into the surprising relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. At first glance, one may scratch their head and wonder what on earth these seemingly disparate subjects could possibly have in common. However, as we will see, the intersection of agriculture and postal services presents an enigmatic puzzle that has eluded both scientists and humorous pundits alike.

In recent years, the proliferation of GMOs in corn has led to a veritable maize craze, with farmers eagerly adopting genetically engineered seeds like kids coveting the latest toy trends. Yet, it appears that this agricultural fervor may have unexpected consequences beyond the farmyard, spilling over into the seemingly unrelated domain of postal administration in North Dakota.

The recommendation letter for GMO corn might read something like this: "This remarkable product not only shows great promise in boosting yields but also appears to have a knack for stirring up intrigue and confounding the scholarly world."

Our study, carried out meticulously over many moons, seeks to unravel this peculiar correlation. By analyzing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2005 to 2022, we discovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value that would make many researchers do a double take – less than 0.01. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the number of postmasters in North Dakota has indeed sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving many scientists both fascinated and bewildered.

The implications of our finding extend far beyond the seemingly parochial confines of North Dakota. It raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly distant domains and invites us to ponder whether the seeds of change in one field – both literally and figuratively – have an uncannily far-reaching impact on another. This Maize Haze, as we affectionately call it, presents an intellectual conundrum that tickles the curiosity and ignites spontaneous chuckles. It serves as a gentle reminder that the scientific world is not just a serious, stodgy affair but also a place where kernels of insight can tickle our brains and spark whimsical debates.

As we embark on this journey through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this delightful romp through the unexpected intertwining of cornfields and postal routes. So, buckle up and prepare to be delighted, surprised, and perhaps just a little corn-fused!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research often uncovers unexpected connections, much like discovering a hidden nest of baby chicks among rows of corn. In this paper, we delve into the surprising relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. At first glance, one may scratch their head and wonder what on earth these seemingly disparate subjects could possibly have in common. However, as we will see, the intersection of agriculture and postal services presents an enigmatic puzzle that has eluded both scientists and humorous pundits alike.
In recent years, the proliferation of GMOs in corn has led to a veritable maize craze, with farmers eagerly adopting genetically engineered seeds like kids coveting the latest toy trends. Yet, it appears that this agricultural fervor may have unexpected consequences beyond the farmyard, spilling over into the seemingly unrelated domain of postal administration in North Dakota.
The recommendation letter for GMO corn might read something like this: "This remarkable product not only shows great promise in boosting yields but also appears to have a knack for stirring up intrigue and confounding the scholarly world."
Our study, carried out meticulously over many moons, seeks to unravel this peculiar correlation. By analyzing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2005 to 2022, we discovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value that would make many researchers do a double take – less than 0.01. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the number of postmasters in North Dakota has indeed sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving many scientists both fascinated and bewildered.
The implications of our finding extend far beyond the seemingly parochial confines of North Dakota. It raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly distant domains and invites us to ponder whether the seeds of change in one field – both literally and figuratively – have an uncannily far-reaching impact on another. This Maize Haze, as we affectionately call it, presents an intellectual conundrum that tickles the curiosity and ignites spontaneous chuckles. It serves as a gentle reminder that the scientific world is not just a serious, stodgy affair but also a place where kernels of insight can tickle our brains and spark whimsical debates.
As we embark on this journey through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this delightful romp through the unexpected intertwining of cornfields and postal routes. So, buckle up and prepare to be delighted, surprised, and perhaps just a little corn-fused!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The perplexing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state has captured the attention of researchers and remained a subject of both bemusement and fascination. A selection of serious studies on the topic offers valuable insights into this seemingly peculiar connection. In "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" by Smith et al., the authors find that the widespread adoption of GMOs has significantly altered farming practices, leading to increased yields and enhanced pest resistance. Similarly, Doe's research in "Genetically Modified Crops: Economic and Environmental Implications" emphasizes the economic and environmental ramifications of GMO use in agriculture, shedding light on the broader implications of this agricultural trend.

However, as we move into the realm of more peculiar discoveries, it is worth noting the curious intersection between "The Corn Whisperer" by J. Jones and the enigma of postmaster dynamics. In this intriguing non-fiction work, Jones explores the mystical world of corn cultivation, offering an unconventional perspective that piques the curiosity of readers and researchers alike. Furthermore, "The Secret Lives of Postmasters" by A. Author provides an unexpected glimpse into the world of postal service management, offering an alternative angle from which to contemplate the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains.

Venturing into the more whimsical side of literature and culture, the relationship between GMOs and postmasters finds an unlikely pairing with fictional works such as "The Corn Identity" by M. Ludlum, a thrilling tale of espionage and intrigue within the agricultural community. Additionally, "The Postmaster's Almanac" by L. Lamott weaves a charming narrative of postal workers and their daily adventures, serving as a delightful diversion from the scholarly pursuit of unraveling the GMO-postmaster enigma.

Bringing a modern twist to the discussion, popular internet memes such as the "GMO Corn Conspiracy Cat" and the "Postmaster Pepe" have playfully engaged social media users, injecting a dose of humor into the ongoing dialogue surrounding this unconventional correlation.

In light of these diverse sources, it is clear that the maize haze of GMO usage and the postmaster maze represents a unique crossroads of agricultural innovation, administrative peculiarities, and cultural fascination. As we navigate through this labyrinth of literature and whimsy, it is essential to approach this enigmatic correlation with both scholarly rigor and a lighthearted spirit, acknowledging the potential for unexpected discoveries and whimsical surprises along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research often uncovers unexpected connections, much like discovering a hidden nest of baby chicks among rows of corn. In this paper, we delve into the surprising relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. At first glance, one may scratch their head and wonder what on earth these seemingly disparate subjects could possibly have in common. However, as we will see, the intersection of agriculture and postal services presents an enigmatic puzzle that has eluded both scientists and humorous pundits alike.
In recent years, the proliferation of GMOs in corn has led to a veritable maize craze, with farmers eagerly adopting genetically engineered seeds like kids coveting the latest toy trends. Yet, it appears that this agricultural fervor may have unexpected consequences beyond the farmyard, spilling over into the seemingly unrelated domain of postal administration in North Dakota.
The recommendation letter for GMO corn might read something like this: "This remarkable product not only shows great promise in boosting yields but also appears to have a knack for stirring up intrigue and confounding the scholarly world."
Our study, carried out meticulously over many moons, seeks to unravel this peculiar correlation. By analyzing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2005 to 2022, we discovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value that would make many researchers do a double take – less than 0.01. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the number of postmasters in North Dakota has indeed sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving many scientists both fascinated and bewildered.
The implications of our finding extend far beyond the seemingly parochial confines of North Dakota. It raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly distant domains and invites us to ponder whether the seeds of change in one field – both literally and figuratively – have an uncannily far-reaching impact on another. This Maize Haze, as we affectionately call it, presents an intellectual conundrum that tickles the curiosity and ignites spontaneous chuckles. It serves as a gentle reminder that the scientific world is not just a serious, stodgy affair but also a place where kernels of insight can tickle our brains and spark whimsical debates.
As we embark on this journey through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this delightful romp through the unexpected intertwining of cornfields and postal routes. So, buckle up and prepare to be delighted, surprised, and perhaps just a little corn-fused!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the mysterious link between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state, our research team employed a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of whimsy. The journey began with a thorough exploration of datasets from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we conducted an exhaustive search through the digital cornfields of internet archives. Like intrepid explorers venturing into uncharted territories, we sifted through an abundance of numerical kernels, seeking the elusive insights that lay hidden within the data.

Our methodological approach can be likened to the careful examination of an ear of corn, peeling back each husk to reveal the succulent kernels within. We delicately gathered information spanning from 2005 to 2022, creating a comprehensive timeline that allowed us to capture the evolution of both GMO influences in agriculture and the fluctuating landscape of postal management.

The peculiar pairing of GMO usage and the presence of postmasters demanded an equally unconventional analytical strategy. We affectionately dubbed this approach "maize-ical modeling," as it involved the creation of sophisticated statistical models that danced merrily through the fields of correlation and regression. Utilizing advanced software tools and a touch of scholarly wizardry, we meticulously examined the relationship between GMO adoption and the number of postmasters, embracing the data with all the enthusiasm of a farmer nurturing a bountiful crop.

Our statistical analysis was as rigorous as it was playful, akin to a game of hopscotch in the cornfield – each step carefully plotted and every leap imbued with the thrill of discovery. We computed correlation coefficients, boldly ventured into the world of p-values, and engaged in the time-honored tradition of 't-test tango,' all in an effort to discern the hidden patterns within the data.

Moreover, the progression of our methodology bore a striking resemblance to the growth of a young corn stalk – starting with the planting of research questions, followed by the careful nurturing of data collection, and culminating in the bountiful harvest of meaningful insights. This anthropomorphic analogy underscores the creative spirit that infused our methodological journey, demonstrating that even the most serious academic pursuits can benefit from a touch of whimsy.

In summary, our methodology blended the precision of statistical analysis with the adventurous spirit of exploration, nurturing a research endeavor that not only sought answers but also reveled in the delight of intellectual discovery. Through this unique approach, we sought to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the postal landscape of North Dakota, all while indulging in the joy of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9396770, r-squared of 0.8829928, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of research often uncovers unexpected connections, much like discovering a hidden nest of baby chicks among rows of corn. In this paper, we delve into the surprising relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. At first glance, one may scratch their head and wonder what on earth these seemingly disparate subjects could possibly have in common. However, as we will see, the intersection of agriculture and postal services presents an enigmatic puzzle that has eluded both scientists and humorous pundits alike.
In recent years, the proliferation of GMOs in corn has led to a veritable maize craze, with farmers eagerly adopting genetically engineered seeds like kids coveting the latest toy trends. Yet, it appears that this agricultural fervor may have unexpected consequences beyond the farmyard, spilling over into the seemingly unrelated domain of postal administration in North Dakota.
The recommendation letter for GMO corn might read something like this: "This remarkable product not only shows great promise in boosting yields but also appears to have a knack for stirring up intrigue and confounding the scholarly world."
Our study, carried out meticulously over many moons, seeks to unravel this peculiar correlation. By analyzing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2005 to 2022, we discovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value that would make many researchers do a double take – less than 0.01. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the number of postmasters in North Dakota has indeed sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving many scientists both fascinated and bewildered.
The implications of our finding extend far beyond the seemingly parochial confines of North Dakota. It raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly distant domains and invites us to ponder whether the seeds of change in one field – both literally and figuratively – have an uncannily far-reaching impact on another. This Maize Haze, as we affectionately call it, presents an intellectual conundrum that tickles the curiosity and ignites spontaneous chuckles. It serves as a gentle reminder that the scientific world is not just a serious, stodgy affair but also a place where kernels of insight can tickle our brains and spark whimsical debates.
As we embark on this journey through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this delightful romp through the unexpected intertwining of cornfields and postal routes. So, buckle up and prepare to be delighted, surprised, and perhaps just a little corn-fused!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770, indicating a strong positive relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. This correlation was further supported by the calculated R-squared value of 0.8829928, demonstrating that approximately 88.3% of the variability in the number of postmasters can be explained by the variability in GMO use in corn.

The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the presence of a significant relationship between the two variables. This result certainly raised eyebrows and drew attention like spotting a unicorn frolicking in a cornfield.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation, akin to two puzzle pieces fitting together with remarkable precision – a metaphorical corn kernel finding its way into a postmaster's mailbox.

In conclusion, our findings solidify the somewhat jocular yet intriguing connection between the maize haze of GMO craze and the postmaster maze in North Dakota. This study not only adds a new layer to the discourse on the unintended consequences of agricultural practices but also tickles the funny bone of the scientific community. The unexpected entanglement of genetically modified corn and postal management whimsically reminds us that research, much like life, can sprinkle unexpected humor and intellectual amusement into our serious pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The perplexing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state has captured the attention of researchers and remained a subject of both bemusement and fascination. A selection of serious studies on the topic offers valuable insights into this seemingly peculiar connection. In "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" by Smith et al., the authors find that the widespread adoption of GMOs has significantly altered farming practices, leading to increased yields and enhanced pest resistance. Similarly, Doe's research in "Genetically Modified Crops: Economic and Environmental Implications" emphasizes the economic and environmental ramifications of GMO use in agriculture, shedding light on the broader implications of this agricultural trend.
However, as we move into the realm of more peculiar discoveries, it is worth noting the curious intersection between "The Corn Whisperer" by J. Jones and the enigma of postmaster dynamics. In this intriguing non-fiction work, Jones explores the mystical world of corn cultivation, offering an unconventional perspective that piques the curiosity of readers and researchers alike. Furthermore, "The Secret Lives of Postmasters" by A. Author provides an unexpected glimpse into the world of postal service management, offering an alternative angle from which to contemplate the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains.
Venturing into the more whimsical side of literature and culture, the relationship between GMOs and postmasters finds an unlikely pairing with fictional works such as "The Corn Identity" by M. Ludlum, a thrilling tale of espionage and intrigue within the agricultural community. Additionally, "The Postmaster's Almanac" by L. Lamott weaves a charming narrative of postal workers and their daily adventures, serving as a delightful diversion from the scholarly pursuit of unraveling the GMO-postmaster enigma.
Bringing a modern twist to the discussion, popular internet memes such as the "GMO Corn Conspiracy Cat" and the "Postmaster Pepe" have playfully engaged social media users, injecting a dose of humor into the ongoing dialogue surrounding this unconventional correlation.
In light of these diverse sources, it is clear that the maize haze of GMO usage and the postmaster maze represents a unique crossroads of agricultural innovation, administrative peculiarities, and cultural fascination. As we navigate through this labyrinth of literature and whimsy, it is essential to approach this enigmatic correlation with both scholarly rigor and a lighthearted spirit, acknowledging the potential for unexpected discoveries and whimsical surprises along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770, indicating a strong positive relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. This correlation was further supported by the calculated R-squared value of 0.8829928, demonstrating that approximately 88.3% of the variability in the number of postmasters can be explained by the variability in GMO use in corn.
The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the presence of a significant relationship between the two variables. This result certainly raised eyebrows and drew attention like spotting a unicorn frolicking in a cornfield.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation, akin to two puzzle pieces fitting together with remarkable precision – a metaphorical corn kernel finding its way into a postmaster's mailbox.
In conclusion, our findings solidify the somewhat jocular yet intriguing connection between the maize haze of GMO craze and the postmaster maze in North Dakota. This study not only adds a new layer to the discourse on the unintended consequences of agricultural practices but also tickles the funny bone of the scientific community. The unexpected entanglement of genetically modified corn and postal management whimsically reminds us that research, much like life, can sprinkle unexpected humor and intellectual amusement into our serious pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study not only support the prior research on the impact of GMOs on agricultural practices but also elevate the discussion to the realm of whimsical surprise and intellectual amusement, akin to stumbling upon a secret compartment in a mailbox. The remarkably high correlation coefficient between GMO usage in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters leads us to ponder whether the soybeans in South Dakota are plotting to overthrow the postmaster general.

Drawing upon the serious studies of Smith et al. and Doe's economic and environmental implications of GMOs, our findings align with the notion that agricultural innovations have rippling effects that extend beyond the farms and into the postal realm. It's as if the GMO-infused cornfields are sending postcards of appreciation to the diligent postmasters, further blurring the boundaries between agricultural practices and administrative peculiarities.

Moreover, embracing the whimsy and unconventional perspectives presented in J. Jones' "The Corn Whisperer" and A. Author's "The Secret Lives of Postmasters," our study echoes the unexpected intersection of these seemingly divergent domains. It's as if a cornstalk is delivering a package to the postmaster's front porch, sparking a symphony of whimsical curiosity among readers and researchers alike.

The unexpected entanglement of genetically modified corn and postal management whimsically reminds us that research, much like life, can sprinkle unexpected humor and intellectual amusement into our serious pursuits. This study has opened the door to a delightful blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted spirit, much like receiving a postcard from a whimsical scientific discovery. As we navigate through the maize haze of GMO craze and the postmaster maze in North Dakota, one thing is clear: the seeds of change in one field have indeed sown a curiously outward-reaching impact on another, prompting us to embrace the unexpected humor and intellectual amusement in our quest for knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The number of postmasters in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of research often uncovers unexpected connections, much like discovering a hidden nest of baby chicks among rows of corn. In this paper, we delve into the surprising relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. At first glance, one may scratch their head and wonder what on earth these seemingly disparate subjects could possibly have in common. However, as we will see, the intersection of agriculture and postal services presents an enigmatic puzzle that has eluded both scientists and humorous pundits alike.
In recent years, the proliferation of GMOs in corn has led to a veritable maize craze, with farmers eagerly adopting genetically engineered seeds like kids coveting the latest toy trends. Yet, it appears that this agricultural fervor may have unexpected consequences beyond the farmyard, spilling over into the seemingly unrelated domain of postal administration in North Dakota.
The recommendation letter for GMO corn might read something like this: "This remarkable product not only shows great promise in boosting yields but also appears to have a knack for stirring up intrigue and confounding the scholarly world."
Our study, carried out meticulously over many moons, seeks to unravel this peculiar correlation. By analyzing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2005 to 2022, we discovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value that would make many researchers do a double take – less than 0.01. The statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the number of postmasters in North Dakota has indeed sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving many scientists both fascinated and bewildered.
The implications of our finding extend far beyond the seemingly parochial confines of North Dakota. It raises profound questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly distant domains and invites us to ponder whether the seeds of change in one field – both literally and figuratively – have an uncannily far-reaching impact on another. This Maize Haze, as we affectionately call it, presents an intellectual conundrum that tickles the curiosity and ignites spontaneous chuckles. It serves as a gentle reminder that the scientific world is not just a serious, stodgy affair but also a place where kernels of insight can tickle our brains and spark whimsical debates.
As we embark on this journey through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this delightful romp through the unexpected intertwining of cornfields and postal routes. So, buckle up and prepare to be delighted, surprised, and perhaps just a little corn-fused!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770, indicating a strong positive relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. This correlation was further supported by the calculated R-squared value of 0.8829928, demonstrating that approximately 88.3% of the variability in the number of postmasters can be explained by the variability in GMO use in corn.
The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, affirming the presence of a significant relationship between the two variables. This result certainly raised eyebrows and drew attention like spotting a unicorn frolicking in a cornfield.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation, akin to two puzzle pieces fitting together with remarkable precision – a metaphorical corn kernel finding its way into a postmaster's mailbox.
In conclusion, our findings solidify the somewhat jocular yet intriguing connection between the maize haze of GMO craze and the postmaster maze in North Dakota. This study not only adds a new layer to the discourse on the unintended consequences of agricultural practices but also tickles the funny bone of the scientific community. The unexpected entanglement of genetically modified corn and postal management whimsically reminds us that research, much like life, can sprinkle unexpected humor and intellectual amusement into our serious pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our research has illuminated a surprisingly strong correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. This Maize Haze phenomenon has evoked both scholarly fascination and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a corny joke that is simultaneously groan-worthy and captivating. The statistical analysis revealed a near-miraculous correlation coefficient and R-squared value, perhaps suggesting that the GMO magic is not just confined to the cornfields but also sprinkles its enchanting dust over the postal service.

Our findings not only add a lighthearted twist to academia but also provide a gentle nudge for researchers to look beyond the obvious and embrace the unexpected connections that infuse wonder and curiosity into our scholarly pursuits. As we bid adieu to this delightful romp through the GMO craze and the postmaster maze, we assert with a wink and a smile that perhaps no more research is needed in this peculiar area of intersection between seeds and stamps.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Ethical Farming


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Maize Haze: GMO Craze and the Postmaster Maze in North Dakota with an abstract of This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of postmasters in the state. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2005 to 2022, our research team discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9396770 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a truly puzzling phenomenon that has perplexed researchers and humorously combined the science of agriculture with the management of postal services. This study opens the door to a myriad of potential follow-up inquiries and provocatively suggests that perhaps the seeds of change in one field have a curiously outward-reaching impact on another.

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, North Dakota, postmasters, USDA, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, agriculture, postal services, maize, research, follow-up inquiries, impact, seeds of change

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

The number of postmasters in North Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postmasters and mail superintendents in North Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postmasters in North Dakota

Correlation r = 0.9396770 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8829928 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postmasters in North Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.3E-9. 0.0000000072891108645952145000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 7.3E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 137,190,944 random variables You don't actually need 137 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)393437343034323620222125212115131217
The number of postmasters in North Dakota (Laborers)3303303203203003002902801501501201201009090909090




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([39,34,37,34,30,34,32,36,20,22,21,25,21,21,15,13,12,17,])
array_2 = np.array([330,330,320,320,300,300,290,280,150,150,120,120,100,90,90,90,90,90,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "The number of postmasters in North Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3050 · Black Variable ID: 733 · Red Variable ID: 12559
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0