Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more philosophy and religion teachers joined the mix, they couldn't help but ponder the deeper meanings of scrums, tackles, and try attempts. Their metaphysical musings on the essence of the game somehow resonated with the locals, drawing them to the TV screens in droves. It seems like in the holy trinity of rugby, the philosophers and religion teachers became the unexpected third influence, propelling the viewership to new heights.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover showcasing a serene landscape of the Utah desert as the backdrop. In the foreground, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers are engaged in an intense discussion, surrounded by books and academic paraphernalia. In the same scene, a crowd is cheering and watching a thrilling Aviva Premiership Rugby final, indicating a surge in viewership. The setting should exude a sense of intellectual discourse juxtaposed with the energy of a sporting event. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration Scalar art Charcoal a meme
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final, in the following situation: As the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah increased, more people developed a sense of existential crisis, leading them to seek solace in the brutal physicality of rugby, thus boosting total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Utah, a growing number of university philosophy and religion teachers is depicted with a gathering of professors engaging in deep discussions. Meanwhile, in the same scene, a crowd is cheering and watching a thrilling Aviva Premiership Rugby final, showing an increase in total viewership.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Utah, a growing number of university philosophy and religion teachers is depicted with a gathering of professors engaging in deep discussions. Meanwhile, in the same scene, a crowd is cheering and watching a thrilling Aviva Premiership Rugby final, showing an increase in total viewership. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover showcasing a serene landscape of the Utah desert as the backdrop. In the foreground, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers are engaged in an intense discussion, surrounded by books and academic paraphernalia. In the same scene, a crowd is cheering and watching a thrilling Aviva Premiership Rugby final, indicating a surge in viewership. The setting should exude a sense of intellectual discourse juxtaposed with the energy of a sporting event.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah caused Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final to increase.
AI academic paper
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey The Journal of Sportive Philosophy and Statistical Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2014.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between academia and athleticism has long been a source of fascination, if not amusement, for scholars and sports enthusiasts alike. The juxtaposition of the profound ruminations of philosophy and religion with the rugged intensity of rugby may seem incongruous at best and utterly bewildering at worst. However, as the saying goes, "there is method in the madness," and our research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.
As we embark on this statistical odyssey, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of human interests and activities that intertwine in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that the ruminative musings of philosophers could potentially influence the fervent following of a rugby championship? It is indeed a puzzle that tickles the intellect and prompts us to delve into the depths of data and correlation.
The landscape of academia and the arena of sports may appear to be as disparate as chalk and cheese, yet our preliminary findings indicate otherwise. The unyielding grip of statistics has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932, evoking a sense of awe and wonder in the face of such unexpected connections. Unraveling the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly divergent realms is a task that has not been undertaken lightly, but with the wit and wisdom of scholars and the fervor of sports aficionados, we dive into this statistical rabbit hole with earnest curiosity.
It is in this spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy that we present our findings, hoping to shed light on the curious dance of numbers that brings together the contemplative nature of academia and the electrifying fervor of athletic spectacles. As we delve into the depths of data and tease out the threads of association, we invite the reader to join us on this scholarly jaunt that traverses the realms of reason and rhyme, philosophy and rugby, in a statistical escapade that defies conventional expectations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between academia and athleticism has long been a source of fascination, if not amusement, for scholars and sports enthusiasts alike. The juxtaposition of the profound ruminations of philosophy and religion with the rugged intensity of rugby may seem incongruous at best and utterly bewildering at worst. However, as the saying goes, "there is method in the madness," and our research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.
As we embark on this statistical odyssey, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of human interests and activities that intertwine in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that the ruminative musings of philosophers could potentially influence the fervent following of a rugby championship? It is indeed a puzzle that tickles the intellect and prompts us to delve into the depths of data and correlation.
The landscape of academia and the arena of sports may appear to be as disparate as chalk and cheese, yet our preliminary findings indicate otherwise. The unyielding grip of statistics has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932, evoking a sense of awe and wonder in the face of such unexpected connections. Unraveling the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly divergent realms is a task that has not been undertaken lightly, but with the wit and wisdom of scholars and the fervor of sports aficionados, we dive into this statistical rabbit hole with earnest curiosity.
It is in this spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy that we present our findings, hoping to shed light on the curious dance of numbers that brings together the contemplative nature of academia and the electrifying fervor of athletic spectacles. As we delve into the depths of data and tease out the threads of association, we invite the reader to join us on this scholarly jaunt that traverses the realms of reason and rhyme, philosophy and rugby, in a statistical escapade that defies conventional expectations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on the correlation between academic disciplines and sports viewership offers valuable insights into the intertwining of seemingly divergent domains. Smith (2010) explored the influence of university faculty demographics on sports popularity, uncovering unexpected relationships that challenge conventional wisdom. Similarly, Doe (2015) investigated the societal factors shaping viewership patterns, illuminating the intricate web of influences that extend beyond the realm of athletics. Jones (2018) delved into the cultural underpinnings of sports fascination, shedding light on the nuanced interactions between intellectual pursuits and physical competitions.
Transitioning to the world of non-fiction books, "Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction" by Nagel (2002) provides a succinct overview of philosophical inquiry, illustrating the depth and breadth of intellectual contemplation. This is juxtaposed with "Rugby For Dummies" by Ford (2015), which offers a lighthearted yet informative guide to the world of rugby, catering to enthusiasts and novices alike. Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979) and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Stein (2008) present narratives that, in their own whimsical ways, touch upon themes of philosophical reflection and athletic pursuits.
Nevertheless, amidst the serious and scholarly works, the internet meme culture has also made its mark on the contemporary discourse surrounding the topics at hand. The "Philosoraptor" meme, a whimsical illustration of a philosophical velociraptor, humorously probes existential questions, mirroring the ponderings of academia. Additionally, the "This is Fine" meme captures the tension between conflicting interests, exemplifying the potential juxtaposition of scholarly contemplation and sporting fervor.
With this contextual backdrop, our research aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the interplay between academia and athleticism, employing rigorous statistical techniques to unravel the intricate relationship between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. In doing so, we embrace the intellectual curiosity that bridges disparate realms, embarking on a statistical odyssey that promises both empirical insights and a touch of whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2014
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between academia and athleticism has long been a source of fascination, if not amusement, for scholars and sports enthusiasts alike. The juxtaposition of the profound ruminations of philosophy and religion with the rugged intensity of rugby may seem incongruous at best and utterly bewildering at worst. However, as the saying goes, "there is method in the madness," and our research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.
As we embark on this statistical odyssey, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of human interests and activities that intertwine in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that the ruminative musings of philosophers could potentially influence the fervent following of a rugby championship? It is indeed a puzzle that tickles the intellect and prompts us to delve into the depths of data and correlation.
The landscape of academia and the arena of sports may appear to be as disparate as chalk and cheese, yet our preliminary findings indicate otherwise. The unyielding grip of statistics has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932, evoking a sense of awe and wonder in the face of such unexpected connections. Unraveling the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly divergent realms is a task that has not been undertaken lightly, but with the wit and wisdom of scholars and the fervor of sports aficionados, we dive into this statistical rabbit hole with earnest curiosity.
It is in this spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy that we present our findings, hoping to shed light on the curious dance of numbers that brings together the contemplative nature of academia and the electrifying fervor of athletic spectacles. As we delve into the depths of data and tease out the threads of association, we invite the reader to join us on this scholarly jaunt that traverses the realms of reason and rhyme, philosophy and rugby, in a statistical escapade that defies conventional expectations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The methodology employed in this study aimed to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final for the years 2003 to 2014. Data collection involved a comprehensive search across diverse internet sources, with a penchant for the arcane wisdom of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the encyclopedic allure of Wikipedia.
To quantify the contemplative and the athletic, the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah was derived from official employment records and academic databases via a process that was as contemplative as the subject matter itself. The total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final was determined through a panoptic gaze upon media and broadcasting metrics, capturing the electrifying fervor of rugby enthusiasts as they immersed themselves in the grand spectacle.
Upon gathering these disparate yet tantalizing data points, the statistical analysis transcended the ordinary realms of correlation calculation, as befitting a study that juxtaposes philosophy and rugby. The correlation coefficient was calculated with utmost precision, teasing out the enigmatic connections that lay beneath the surface, akin to a philosophical discourse on the meaning of statistics. The p-value, serving as the sentinel of significance, stood guard over the threshold of acceptance, as the numbers engaged in a dance of statistical significance that mirrored the enthralling twists and turns of a rugby match.
The statistical odyssey embarked upon by the research team harnessed the prowess of software tools that ensured rigor and objectivity in the analysis. This analytical journey, while guided by the steadfast principles of academic research, could not help but be laced with the thrill of untangling a mystery, much like a detective unraveling the unexpected connections in a classic whodunit.
The exhaustive data from across the years 2003 to 2014 was meticulously curated, allowing for a longitudinal exploration of the elusive relationship between the ruminative pursuits of academia and the adrenaline-charged fervor of sports. The methodology employed, replete with its ponderous musings and statistical gymnastics, served as a vehicle through which the researchers voyaged into the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary intrigue, leaving no stone unturned in the pursuit of unraveling the improbable interconnectedness of the universe.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .
For the time period 2003 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.9078932, r-squared of 0.8242701, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between academia and athleticism has long been a source of fascination, if not amusement, for scholars and sports enthusiasts alike. The juxtaposition of the profound ruminations of philosophy and religion with the rugged intensity of rugby may seem incongruous at best and utterly bewildering at worst. However, as the saying goes, "there is method in the madness," and our research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.
As we embark on this statistical odyssey, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of human interests and activities that intertwine in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that the ruminative musings of philosophers could potentially influence the fervent following of a rugby championship? It is indeed a puzzle that tickles the intellect and prompts us to delve into the depths of data and correlation.
The landscape of academia and the arena of sports may appear to be as disparate as chalk and cheese, yet our preliminary findings indicate otherwise. The unyielding grip of statistics has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932, evoking a sense of awe and wonder in the face of such unexpected connections. Unraveling the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly divergent realms is a task that has not been undertaken lightly, but with the wit and wisdom of scholars and the fervor of sports aficionados, we dive into this statistical rabbit hole with earnest curiosity.
It is in this spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy that we present our findings, hoping to shed light on the curious dance of numbers that brings together the contemplative nature of academia and the electrifying fervor of athletic spectacles. As we delve into the depths of data and tease out the threads of association, we invite the reader to join us on this scholarly jaunt that traverses the realms of reason and rhyme, philosophy and rugby, in a statistical escapade that defies conventional expectations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a noteworthy correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final for the period spanning 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and physical prowess, as encapsulated in the realms of academia and athletics.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8242701 indicates that approximately 82.4% of the variability in the viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah. This finding, while surprising, underscores the substantial influence of scholarly contemplation on the fervent enthusiasm for sporting events, highlighting the multifaceted nature of human interests and activities.
The statistical significance, evidenced by a p-value less than 0.01, unequivocally supports the robustness of the observed correlation. The probability of obtaining such a strong relationship between these variables by chance is exceedingly low, reinforcing the substantial nature of our findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the striking correlation between the aforementioned variables, elucidating the compelling association that has emerged from our rigorous data analysis. This graphical depiction serves as a testament to the intricacies of the human experience, where the cerebral pursuits of academia and the visceral allure of athletic competitions intersect in unforeseen ways.
In conclusion, the results of this investigation illuminate the enigmatic connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. This unanticipated correlation challenges conventional expectations and invites further contemplation on the profound interweaving of intellectual inquiry and physical exuberance in the intricate fabric of human endeavors.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on the correlation between academic disciplines and sports viewership offers valuable insights into the intertwining of seemingly divergent domains. Smith (2010) explored the influence of university faculty demographics on sports popularity, uncovering unexpected relationships that challenge conventional wisdom. Similarly, Doe (2015) investigated the societal factors shaping viewership patterns, illuminating the intricate web of influences that extend beyond the realm of athletics. Jones (2018) delved into the cultural underpinnings of sports fascination, shedding light on the nuanced interactions between intellectual pursuits and physical competitions.
Transitioning to the world of non-fiction books, "Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction" by Nagel (2002) provides a succinct overview of philosophical inquiry, illustrating the depth and breadth of intellectual contemplation. This is juxtaposed with "Rugby For Dummies" by Ford (2015), which offers a lighthearted yet informative guide to the world of rugby, catering to enthusiasts and novices alike. Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979) and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Stein (2008) present narratives that, in their own whimsical ways, touch upon themes of philosophical reflection and athletic pursuits.
Nevertheless, amidst the serious and scholarly works, the internet meme culture has also made its mark on the contemporary discourse surrounding the topics at hand. The "Philosoraptor" meme, a whimsical illustration of a philosophical velociraptor, humorously probes existential questions, mirroring the ponderings of academia. Additionally, the "This is Fine" meme captures the tension between conflicting interests, exemplifying the potential juxtaposition of scholarly contemplation and sporting fervor.
With this contextual backdrop, our research aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the interplay between academia and athleticism, employing rigorous statistical techniques to unravel the intricate relationship between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. In doing so, we embrace the intellectual curiosity that bridges disparate realms, embarking on a statistical odyssey that promises both empirical insights and a touch of whimsy.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a noteworthy correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final for the period spanning 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and physical prowess, as encapsulated in the realms of academia and athletics.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8242701 indicates that approximately 82.4% of the variability in the viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah. This finding, while surprising, underscores the substantial influence of scholarly contemplation on the fervent enthusiasm for sporting events, highlighting the multifaceted nature of human interests and activities.
The statistical significance, evidenced by a p-value less than 0.01, unequivocally supports the robustness of the observed correlation. The probability of obtaining such a strong relationship between these variables by chance is exceedingly low, reinforcing the substantial nature of our findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the striking correlation between the aforementioned variables, elucidating the compelling association that has emerged from our rigorous data analysis. This graphical depiction serves as a testament to the intricacies of the human experience, where the cerebral pursuits of academia and the visceral allure of athletic competitions intersect in unforeseen ways.
In conclusion, the results of this investigation illuminate the enigmatic connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. This unanticipated correlation challenges conventional expectations and invites further contemplation on the profound interweaving of intellectual inquiry and physical exuberance in the intricate fabric of human endeavors.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study astonish and bemuse in equal measure, as the contemplative musings of Utah's philosophers and the dramatic collisions on the rugby pitch exhibit a peculiar symbiosis that defies conventional categorization. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 aligns with the prior research of Smith (2010) and Doe (2015), who, while seemingly treading into the realm of whimsy, delicately unveiled the intricate web of unconventional relationships between academic disciplines and sports viewership. This unanticipated correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final fortifies the notion that intellectual pursuits and physical spectacles often share an unexpected rapport, echoing the mirthful ponderings of the "Philosoraptor" meme and the tension-laden scenes encapsulated by the "This is Fine" meme.
The robust coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8242701 underscores the substantial impact of scholarly contemplation on the fervent enthusiasm for sporting events, cementing the notion that the human penchant for intellectual inquiry intertwines with the primal allure of physical prowess. This finding harks back to the sagacious yet lighthearted guidance of "Rugby For Dummies" by Ford (2015), comically illustrating the accessibility of athletic fervor while subtly hinting at the deeper contemplations that underpin such exuberance.
The statistical significance, indicated by a p-value less than 0.01, unequivocally supports the robustness of the observed correlation, establishing the unlikely yet undeniable union between academic richness and sporting zeal. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a graphic testament to the unfathomable interconnectedness of human interests, encapsulating the unexpected dance of statistics that delineates the tangled relationship between roundtables of scholarly discourse and the oval-shaped playing field of athletic prowess.
In unraveling the enigmatic connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final, this study contributes to the ever-growing compendium of unforeseen correlations, inviting further contemplation on the profound interweaving of intellectual inquiry and physical exuberance in the intricate fabric of human endeavors. As the statistical odyssey reaches its conclusion, it leaves scholars and sports enthusiasts alike to marvel at the intricate dance of academia and athletics, reminding us that, in the grand tapestry of human existence, the rhyme and reason of seemingly disparate pursuits may converge in the most unexpected of ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between academia and athleticism has long been a source of fascination, if not amusement, for scholars and sports enthusiasts alike. The juxtaposition of the profound ruminations of philosophy and religion with the rugged intensity of rugby may seem incongruous at best and utterly bewildering at worst. However, as the saying goes, "there is method in the madness," and our research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final.
As we embark on this statistical odyssey, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of human interests and activities that intertwine in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that the ruminative musings of philosophers could potentially influence the fervent following of a rugby championship? It is indeed a puzzle that tickles the intellect and prompts us to delve into the depths of data and correlation.
The landscape of academia and the arena of sports may appear to be as disparate as chalk and cheese, yet our preliminary findings indicate otherwise. The unyielding grip of statistics has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9078932, evoking a sense of awe and wonder in the face of such unexpected connections. Unraveling the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly divergent realms is a task that has not been undertaken lightly, but with the wit and wisdom of scholars and the fervor of sports aficionados, we dive into this statistical rabbit hole with earnest curiosity.
It is in this spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy that we present our findings, hoping to shed light on the curious dance of numbers that brings together the contemplative nature of academia and the electrifying fervor of athletic spectacles. As we delve into the depths of data and tease out the threads of association, we invite the reader to join us on this scholarly jaunt that traverses the realms of reason and rhyme, philosophy and rugby, in a statistical escapade that defies conventional expectations.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a noteworthy correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final for the period spanning 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and physical prowess, as encapsulated in the realms of academia and athletics.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8242701 indicates that approximately 82.4% of the variability in the viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah. This finding, while surprising, underscores the substantial influence of scholarly contemplation on the fervent enthusiasm for sporting events, highlighting the multifaceted nature of human interests and activities.
The statistical significance, evidenced by a p-value less than 0.01, unequivocally supports the robustness of the observed correlation. The probability of obtaining such a strong relationship between these variables by chance is exceedingly low, reinforcing the substantial nature of our findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the striking correlation between the aforementioned variables, elucidating the compelling association that has emerged from our rigorous data analysis. This graphical depiction serves as a testament to the intricacies of the human experience, where the cerebral pursuits of academia and the visceral allure of athletic competitions intersect in unforeseen ways.
In conclusion, the results of this investigation illuminate the enigmatic connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. This unanticipated correlation challenges conventional expectations and invites further contemplation on the profound interweaving of intellectual inquiry and physical exuberance in the intricate fabric of human endeavors.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In summation, the perplexing correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final has unveiled an unexpected symbiosis between the realms of scholarly contemplation and athletic fervor. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 has a striking gravitational pull, drawing attention to the interplay of the cerebral and the corporeal, the contemplative and the action-packed. This statistical odyssey has led us down a rabbit hole of intellectual curiosity, where the dance of numbers twirls with the finesse of a rugby scrum.
While this revelation may seem as improbable as a philosopher donning rugby boots, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8242701 emphasizes that approximately 82.4% of the variability in the viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final can be elucidated by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah. Such a notable influence prompts one to ponder the nuanced web of human interests, where the quizzical conundrums of academia and the thundering exhilaration of sports collide in an unexpected pas de deux.
The visually appealing scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a testament to the intricate intermingling of intellectual pursuits and physical dynamism, painting a canvas of statistical artistry that captures the essence of this compelling correlation. As we take a moment to reflect on the whirlwind romance between the musings of philosophers and the cheers of rugby enthusiasts, we are reminded that the unpredictable dance of statistics has a rhythm all its own.
In light of these revelatory findings, we are inclined to assert that no further research in this peculiar territory is necessary. The statistical odyssey has reached its crescendo, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous symphony of academic contemplation and athletic ardor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Sportive Philosophy and Statistical Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Analytical Sport and Philosophy Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey with an abstract of This research paper delves into the esoteric correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Utah and the total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Employing rigorous methods, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9078932 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2014. This confounding connection between the contemplative nature of philosophers and the adrenaline-fueled spectacle of rugby leaves us pondering the unfathomable interconnectedness of the universe, where the realms of academia and athletics collide in an unexpected dance of statistics.
ChatGPT:
Utah, philosophers, religion teachers, Aviva Premiership Rugby final, correlation, statistics, data analysis, university faculty, academia, athletic events, viewership, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, rugby, contemplation, interconnectedness of the universe
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in UtahDetailed data title: BLS estimate of philosophy and religion teachers, postsecondary in Utah
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah
Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8242701 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah) over the 12 years from 2003 through 2014.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.5E-5. 0.0000446524865481918600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0045% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 22,395 random variables You don't actually need 22 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.7, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah (Laborers) | 60 | 90 | 90 | 60 | 50 | 200 | 210 | 190 | 190 | 180 | 190 | 140 |
Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final (Viewership) | 42000 | 59500 | 66000 | 58000 | 59000 | 81600 | 81601 | 81600 | 80016 | 81779 | 81703 | 81193 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60,90,90,60,50,200,210,190,190,180,190,140,])
array_2 = np.array([42000,59500,66000,58000,59000,81600,81601,81600,80016,81779,81703,81193,])
array_1_name = "The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah"
array_2_name = "Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Utah
- Line chart for only Total viewership of the Aviva Premiership Rugby final
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Rhyme and Reason of Utah's Philosophers and the Aviva Premiership Rugby Final: A Statistical Odyssey
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 3014 · Black Variable ID: 15031 · Red Variable ID: 385