about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,921 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Massachusetts and the second variable is Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer fires meant fewer people were feeling the burn to watch American Idol. They just couldn't ignite the same level of excitement without the fiery drama.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image with the style of macabre depicting a desolate Massachusetts town with an eerie glow emanating from a few remaining burning buildings, while silhouettes of residents are seen staring blankly at static-filled TVs in their darkened homes, as the neglected American Idol stage looms ominously in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Whimsical illustration Parallax art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Macabre

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale, in the following situation: As the number of arsons decreased in Massachusetts, fewer fiery spectacles were available to distract viewers from the American Idol Season Finale, leading to a decline in viewership count as people were no longer seeking alternative sources of entertainment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Massachusetts, the declining number of arsons meant that firefighters had fewer blazing buildings to battle, allowing residents to turn their attention back to their TVs. As a result, the American Idol Season Finale's viewership count decreased, with fewer people seeking alternative entertainment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Macabre ] and depicting this scene: In Massachusetts, the declining number of arsons meant that firefighters had fewer blazing buildings to battle, allowing residents to turn their attention back to their TVs. As a result, the American Idol Season Finale's viewership count decreased, with fewer people seeking alternative entertainment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image with the style of macabre depicting a desolate Massachusetts town with an eerie glow emanating from a few remaining burning buildings, while silhouettes of residents are seen staring blankly at static-filled TVs in their darkened homes, as the neglected American Idol stage looms ominously in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Massachusetts caused Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

Journal of Firestarters and Pop Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Fire has long been a subject of fascination and fear for humankind. From its essential role in the progress of civilization to its devastating potential for destruction, the phenomenon of fire has captured our attention for millennia. And in the realm of popular culture, fire has also been prominently featured, from action-packed blockbusters to, dare I say, "hot" reality TV shows.

Speaking of which, let's set the stage for our investigation with a little joke: Why did the arsonist carry a map? Because he wanted to set the world on fire!

In this study, we turn our attention to the unexpected yet captivating relationship between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. One may wonder what could possibly connect these two seemingly disparate phenomena, and it turns out that the answer is not just smoke and mirrors—there's actual statistical fire behind it.

Now, for another zinger: What do you call the TV show about firefighting? "Flamin' Hot Dramas!"

Employing data gathered from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia (because sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of science), we set out to explore the correlation between arson rates and American Idol viewership from the years 2002 to 2022. What we unearthed was more than just a fluke—it was a bonfire of intriguing findings.

Let's keep the flame puns rolling: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! But in our case, the statistical relationship we uncovered is no joke. It's as real as a well-crafted pun—both surprising and satisfying.

So, buckle up as we delve into the fiery depths of this unlikely connection and attempt to shed light on the factors that fuel the curious correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the fascination with the dramatic crescendos of American Idol season finales. It's a wild ride, much like a dad's attempt at grilling, but we assure you, the sizzle is worth it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a subject of fascination and fear for humankind. From its essential role in the progress of civilization to its devastating potential for destruction, the phenomenon of fire has captured our attention for millennia. And in the realm of popular culture, fire has also been prominently featured, from action-packed blockbusters to, dare I say, "hot" reality TV shows.
Speaking of which, let's set the stage for our investigation with a little joke: Why did the arsonist carry a map? Because he wanted to set the world on fire!
In this study, we turn our attention to the unexpected yet captivating relationship between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. One may wonder what could possibly connect these two seemingly disparate phenomena, and it turns out that the answer is not just smoke and mirrors—there's actual statistical fire behind it.
Now, for another zinger: What do you call the TV show about firefighting? "Flamin' Hot Dramas!"
Employing data gathered from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia (because sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of science), we set out to explore the correlation between arson rates and American Idol viewership from the years 2002 to 2022. What we unearthed was more than just a fluke—it was a bonfire of intriguing findings.
Let's keep the flame puns rolling: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! But in our case, the statistical relationship we uncovered is no joke. It's as real as a well-crafted pun—both surprising and satisfying.
So, buckle up as we delve into the fiery depths of this unlikely connection and attempt to shed light on the factors that fuel the curious correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the fascination with the dramatic crescendos of American Idol season finales. It's a wild ride, much like a dad's attempt at grilling, but we assure you, the sizzle is worth it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing literature on arson and popular culture may not immediately seem relevant to our specific focus on the connection between arson rates in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. However, a broader exploration of related topics provides valuable context and sparks some illuminating insights—pun intended.

In "Fire and Fury: The Impacts of Pyromania on Modern Society," Smith examines the various social and psychological factors contributing to arson behavior. While the book doesn't directly address reality TV viewership, it does offer a peek into the fiery minds of individuals who feel the urge to ignite. It's almost as if they're looking for their own personal "hot" sensation.

Speaking of hot sensations, "The Spark of Reality: Exploring Pyromania and Reality TV" by Doe offers a closer examination of the intersections between pyromania and the captivating allure of reality television. Though the text focuses primarily on the broader appeal of reality TV, it sends sparks flying as it hints at potential connections between arson and popular media consumption. It's almost like an unseen flame, flickering at the edge of our awareness.

Now, let's take a brief detour into fiction with "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson. While this gripping novel is not directly related to arson rates in Massachusetts or American Idol, its title alone evokes the imagery of flames and the dangerous thrill of toying with fire. One might say that the protagonist's actions are as unpredictable as the fluctuating viewership of reality TV finales.

Continuing with our fictional expedition, "Inferno" by Dan Brown leads readers through a labyrinth of mystery and intrigue, with its protagonist unravelling codes and symbols while navigating a sea of danger. Despite focusing on a different type of fire—one of the intellectual and historical variety—Brown's work reminds us that sometimes, the greatest blazes are the ones that burn in our minds. And hey, who's to say that the burning passion of American Idol fandom isn't equally intense?

Turning to the realm of internet culture, the "This is Fine" meme has been an enduring symbol of placid acceptance in the face of chaos. Depicting a dog calmly sipping coffee as the room burns around it, the meme encapsulates the notion of maintaining composure in the midst of mayhem. While its connection to our research may seem tenuous, it serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes, we all have to adapt and carry on—even when things are, quite literally, on fire. After all, who doesn't need a little levity when diving into the world of statistical correlations and unexpected connections?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a subject of fascination and fear for humankind. From its essential role in the progress of civilization to its devastating potential for destruction, the phenomenon of fire has captured our attention for millennia. And in the realm of popular culture, fire has also been prominently featured, from action-packed blockbusters to, dare I say, "hot" reality TV shows.
Speaking of which, let's set the stage for our investigation with a little joke: Why did the arsonist carry a map? Because he wanted to set the world on fire!
In this study, we turn our attention to the unexpected yet captivating relationship between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. One may wonder what could possibly connect these two seemingly disparate phenomena, and it turns out that the answer is not just smoke and mirrors—there's actual statistical fire behind it.
Now, for another zinger: What do you call the TV show about firefighting? "Flamin' Hot Dramas!"
Employing data gathered from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia (because sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of science), we set out to explore the correlation between arson rates and American Idol viewership from the years 2002 to 2022. What we unearthed was more than just a fluke—it was a bonfire of intriguing findings.
Let's keep the flame puns rolling: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! But in our case, the statistical relationship we uncovered is no joke. It's as real as a well-crafted pun—both surprising and satisfying.
So, buckle up as we delve into the fiery depths of this unlikely connection and attempt to shed light on the factors that fuel the curious correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the fascination with the dramatic crescendos of American Idol season finales. It's a wild ride, much like a dad's attempt at grilling, but we assure you, the sizzle is worth it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the fiery connection between arson rates in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales, our research team employed a combination of quantitative analysis and a dash of speculative storytelling. The data utilized for this study were obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the treasure trove of trivia known as Wikipedia. We acknowledge that the use of Wikipedia may raise a few eyebrows, but sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of scientific inquiry—and, let's be honest, for the occasional distraction of clicking through random articles.

First, we compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2002 to 2022, encompassing arson incidents in Massachusetts and the viewership numbers for American Idol season finale episodes. This involved trawling through various online resources to gather the necessary information. We also enjoyed the occasional game of "spot the arsonist" in true Where's Waldo? fashion, but that's just a small testament to our team's enthusiasm for the project.

Once the data were securely in our possession, we embarked on a rigorous process of data cleaning and validation. This included sifting through the virtual ashes of online records to ensure accuracy and consistency, as well as checking for any suspiciously inflated American Idol viewer numbers—though we must admit, the thought of an arsonist sneaking in a few extra views did cross our minds.

In keeping with the spirit of whimsy and wonder, we then subjected the data to a series of statistical analyses. Using the trusty tools of correlation coefficients, regression models, and hypothesis testing, we sought to tease out the potential relationship between arson rates and American Idol viewership. It was a bit like performing a magic trick, but with probability values and confidence intervals instead of rabbits and top hats.

In addition to the quantitative analyses, we stirred in a pinch of qualitative exploration by immersing ourselves in the context of popular culture and criminology literature. This allowed us to consider potential confounding variables, such as media influences and societal factors, and to ponder the unexpected parallels between arson escapades and reality TV fandom. It also gave us an excuse to catch up on our guilty pleasure TV shows under the guise of academic research—what can we say, we take our methodological immersion seriously.

Ultimately, our methodology reflects a blend of systematic inquiry, computational sorcery, and a sprinkle of speculative storytelling—in the pursuit of unraveling the curious intertwining of arson rates in Massachusetts and the sizzle of American Idol season finales. It's a bit like concocting an experimental recipe: you mix the ingredients, apply some heat, and hope for a flavorful outcome. Stay tuned as we serve up the tantalizing results of our analysis, plus a few obscure puns to keep the flames of curiosity burning bright.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9091258, r-squared of 0.8265097, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Fire has long been a subject of fascination and fear for humankind. From its essential role in the progress of civilization to its devastating potential for destruction, the phenomenon of fire has captured our attention for millennia. And in the realm of popular culture, fire has also been prominently featured, from action-packed blockbusters to, dare I say, "hot" reality TV shows.
Speaking of which, let's set the stage for our investigation with a little joke: Why did the arsonist carry a map? Because he wanted to set the world on fire!
In this study, we turn our attention to the unexpected yet captivating relationship between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. One may wonder what could possibly connect these two seemingly disparate phenomena, and it turns out that the answer is not just smoke and mirrors—there's actual statistical fire behind it.
Now, for another zinger: What do you call the TV show about firefighting? "Flamin' Hot Dramas!"
Employing data gathered from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia (because sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of science), we set out to explore the correlation between arson rates and American Idol viewership from the years 2002 to 2022. What we unearthed was more than just a fluke—it was a bonfire of intriguing findings.
Let's keep the flame puns rolling: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! But in our case, the statistical relationship we uncovered is no joke. It's as real as a well-crafted pun—both surprising and satisfying.
So, buckle up as we delve into the fiery depths of this unlikely connection and attempt to shed light on the factors that fuel the curious correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the fascination with the dramatic crescendos of American Idol season finales. It's a wild ride, much like a dad's attempt at grilling, but we assure you, the sizzle is worth it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales for the years 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 indicates a robust relationship between these variables, resembling the steadfast bond between marshmallows and a campfire—one simply ignites the other.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8265097 demonstrates that approximately 82.65% of the variation in American Idol viewership can be explained by changes in arson rates. In other words, this correlation is as undeniable as a fireman's need for a trusty hose.

The statistical significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by chance alone is less than 1%, making this relationship hotter than a jalapeño on a summer day.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between arson rates and American Idol viewership. The data points follow a clear upward trend, akin to the rising flames of interest in the talent-filled crescendos of the show's grand finales.

In the immortal words of a dad at a barbecue, "Why was the fireman so good at his job? Because he refused to be extinguished!" And in a similar vein, this correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and American Idol viewership refuses to be extinguished from the realm of statistical significance.

These findings not only raise eyebrows but also stoke the flames of curiosity, prompting further exploration into the factors fueling this unexpected relationship. Just like a well-timed dad joke, our results leave one both surprised and perhaps a bit amused, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most unexpected connections can spark the brightest insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on arson and popular culture may not immediately seem relevant to our specific focus on the connection between arson rates in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. However, a broader exploration of related topics provides valuable context and sparks some illuminating insights—pun intended.
In "Fire and Fury: The Impacts of Pyromania on Modern Society," Smith examines the various social and psychological factors contributing to arson behavior. While the book doesn't directly address reality TV viewership, it does offer a peek into the fiery minds of individuals who feel the urge to ignite. It's almost as if they're looking for their own personal "hot" sensation.
Speaking of hot sensations, "The Spark of Reality: Exploring Pyromania and Reality TV" by Doe offers a closer examination of the intersections between pyromania and the captivating allure of reality television. Though the text focuses primarily on the broader appeal of reality TV, it sends sparks flying as it hints at potential connections between arson and popular media consumption. It's almost like an unseen flame, flickering at the edge of our awareness.
Now, let's take a brief detour into fiction with "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson. While this gripping novel is not directly related to arson rates in Massachusetts or American Idol, its title alone evokes the imagery of flames and the dangerous thrill of toying with fire. One might say that the protagonist's actions are as unpredictable as the fluctuating viewership of reality TV finales.
Continuing with our fictional expedition, "Inferno" by Dan Brown leads readers through a labyrinth of mystery and intrigue, with its protagonist unravelling codes and symbols while navigating a sea of danger. Despite focusing on a different type of fire—one of the intellectual and historical variety—Brown's work reminds us that sometimes, the greatest blazes are the ones that burn in our minds. And hey, who's to say that the burning passion of American Idol fandom isn't equally intense?
Turning to the realm of internet culture, the "This is Fine" meme has been an enduring symbol of placid acceptance in the face of chaos. Depicting a dog calmly sipping coffee as the room burns around it, the meme encapsulates the notion of maintaining composure in the midst of mayhem. While its connection to our research may seem tenuous, it serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes, we all have to adapt and carry on—even when things are, quite literally, on fire. After all, who doesn't need a little levity when diving into the world of statistical correlations and unexpected connections?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales for the years 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 indicates a robust relationship between these variables, resembling the steadfast bond between marshmallows and a campfire—one simply ignites the other.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8265097 demonstrates that approximately 82.65% of the variation in American Idol viewership can be explained by changes in arson rates. In other words, this correlation is as undeniable as a fireman's need for a trusty hose.
The statistical significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by chance alone is less than 1%, making this relationship hotter than a jalapeño on a summer day.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between arson rates and American Idol viewership. The data points follow a clear upward trend, akin to the rising flames of interest in the talent-filled crescendos of the show's grand finales.
In the immortal words of a dad at a barbecue, "Why was the fireman so good at his job? Because he refused to be extinguished!" And in a similar vein, this correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and American Idol viewership refuses to be extinguished from the realm of statistical significance.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also stoke the flames of curiosity, prompting further exploration into the factors fueling this unexpected relationship. Just like a well-timed dad joke, our results leave one both surprised and perhaps a bit amused, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most unexpected connections can spark the brightest insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has illuminated a rather incendiary relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 sets the stage for an engaging discussion—much like gathering around a crackling campfire with friends. This correlation is as clear as night and day; much like a fireman's job, it refuses to be extinguished!

Our findings provide empirical support for the notion that there exists a strong connection between the proclivity for arson and the propensity to tune into the electrifying season finales of American Idol. Just as a well-crafted dad joke elicits both groans and chuckles, this correlation portrays a remarkable interplay between two seemingly disparate phenomena. It's almost as if the arsonists and American Idol fans are engaging in a fiery dance, with each group unknowingly fanning the flames of the other's activities.

Taking a lighthearted detour into our literature review, the insights from Smith's "Fire and Fury" manifest in our findings; it's almost as if the spark of arson behavior ignites alongside the explosive allure of reality talent shows. Similarly, the fictional adventures we embarked on shed light on the unexpected connections one can find in the midst of seemingly unrelated topics. It's as if we've uncovered the elusive spark of truth underneath a pile of kindling—analogous to unearthing a well-hidden dad joke in a sea of serious discourse.

As our statistical analysis has confirmed, the association between arson rates and American Idol viewership is as undeniable as a dad's knack for cracking puns at family gatherings. Our findings set ablaze the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike, provoking a fervent desire to delve into the underlying reasons behind this intriguing correlation. The flames of inquiry burn bright, beckoning us to further explore the behavioral and psychological factors shaping this unexpected relationship.

Our results are more than just a brushfire in the field of statistical correlations; they exemplify the fascinating potential for unearthing meaningful patterns in the most unexpected places, much like stumbling upon a hidden gem in a pile of statistical data. In the spirit of our findings, let's leave you with one final dad joke: "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!" Just as this joke likely elicited an amused groan, our research has sparked both surprise and amusement, proving that even the most unexpected connections can kindle the brightest insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.

The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.

But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Fire has long been a subject of fascination and fear for humankind. From its essential role in the progress of civilization to its devastating potential for destruction, the phenomenon of fire has captured our attention for millennia. And in the realm of popular culture, fire has also been prominently featured, from action-packed blockbusters to, dare I say, "hot" reality TV shows.
Speaking of which, let's set the stage for our investigation with a little joke: Why did the arsonist carry a map? Because he wanted to set the world on fire!
In this study, we turn our attention to the unexpected yet captivating relationship between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. One may wonder what could possibly connect these two seemingly disparate phenomena, and it turns out that the answer is not just smoke and mirrors—there's actual statistical fire behind it.
Now, for another zinger: What do you call the TV show about firefighting? "Flamin' Hot Dramas!"
Employing data gathered from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and Wikipedia (because sometimes you have to take a leap of faith for the sake of science), we set out to explore the correlation between arson rates and American Idol viewership from the years 2002 to 2022. What we unearthed was more than just a fluke—it was a bonfire of intriguing findings.
Let's keep the flame puns rolling: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! But in our case, the statistical relationship we uncovered is no joke. It's as real as a well-crafted pun—both surprising and satisfying.
So, buckle up as we delve into the fiery depths of this unlikely connection and attempt to shed light on the factors that fuel the curious correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the fascination with the dramatic crescendos of American Idol season finales. It's a wild ride, much like a dad's attempt at grilling, but we assure you, the sizzle is worth it.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales for the years 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 indicates a robust relationship between these variables, resembling the steadfast bond between marshmallows and a campfire—one simply ignites the other.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8265097 demonstrates that approximately 82.65% of the variation in American Idol viewership can be explained by changes in arson rates. In other words, this correlation is as undeniable as a fireman's need for a trusty hose.
The statistical significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by chance alone is less than 1%, making this relationship hotter than a jalapeño on a summer day.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between arson rates and American Idol viewership. The data points follow a clear upward trend, akin to the rising flames of interest in the talent-filled crescendos of the show's grand finales.
In the immortal words of a dad at a barbecue, "Why was the fireman so good at his job? Because he refused to be extinguished!" And in a similar vein, this correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and American Idol viewership refuses to be extinguished from the realm of statistical significance.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also stoke the flames of curiosity, prompting further exploration into the factors fueling this unexpected relationship. Just like a well-timed dad joke, our results leave one both surprised and perhaps a bit amused, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most unexpected connections can spark the brightest insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has not only illuminated the surprisingly fiery connection between arson rates in Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales but has also sparked a newfound appreciation for the heat of statistical analysis. Much like a perfectly timed dad joke, the correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and the r-squared value of 0.8265097 stand as testaments to the captivating bond between these seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that statistical relationships can sometimes burn brighter than we expect.

As we bid adieu to this fiery investigation, let's leave you with a parting dad joke: Why don't arsonists ever get bored? Because they're always igniting something new! But in all seriousness, our findings kindle the need for further exploration into the underlying factors driving this unexpected correlation.

But to put it in plain terms, let's call it a day on this topic. After all, trying to explain the synergy between arson rates and American Idol viewership is like trying to teach a cat to juggle—it's entertaining, but it may not yield meaningful results. Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, not every statistical relationship needs to be set ablaze with further scrutiny.

And with that, we extinguish the flames of investigation, confident that our findings will continue to ignite intrigue and perhaps a chuckle or two. Thank you for joining us on this curious journey through the statistical landscape of arson and American Idol—an unexpected pairing that has proven to be more captivating than a dramatic reality TV show finale!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Firestarters and Pop Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sociological Quirk Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pyromania and Idol Mania: A Study of the Relationship Between Arson Rates in Massachusetts and Viewership of American Idol Season Finales with an abstract of This paper examines the unexpected and slightly combustible relationship between arson rates in the state of Massachusetts and the viewership count of American Idol season finales. The research team, unable to resist the lure of a fiery pun, delves into this correlation using data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the reliable, albeit less official, source of Wikipedia. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9091258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2022.
The study uncovers a positive relationship between arson rates and viewership of American Idol season finales, indicating that as one increases, so does the other. It seems that the more American Idol captivates audiences, the more likely it is that someone in Massachusetts will decide to play with fire. Our findings spark curiosity and may set ablaze the need for further investigation into the underlying factors influencing this unlikely connection.
But really, who's setting the world on fire here—arsonists or American Idol fans? It's a toss-up, just like the fiery twists in a good dad joke.

ChatGPT:

arson rates, American Idol, viewership, Massachusetts, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, criminal justice information services, FBI data, Wikipedia, underlying factors, relationship, investigation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Massachusetts
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Massachusetts

Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale

Correlation r = 0.9091258 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8265097 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Massachusetts) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-8. 0.0000000116706287815940770000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 85,685,186 random variables You don't actually need 85 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in Massachusetts (Arson rate)10.410.59.39.710.310.610.610.7108.59.37.67.15.76.55.64.34.56.34.55.3
Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale (Viewers)23020000380600002884000030270000363800003076000031660000288400002422000029290000214900001431000010530000803000013300000086300008740000728000065000006490000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10.4,10.5,9.3,9.7,10.3,10.6,10.6,10.7,10,8.5,9.3,7.6,7.1,5.7,6.5,5.6,4.3,4.5,6.3,4.5,5.3,])
array_2 = np.array([23020000,38060000,28840000,30270000,36380000,30760000,31660000,28840000,24220000,29290000,21490000,14310000,10530000,8030000,13300000,0,8630000,8740000,7280000,6500000,6490000,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2921 · Black Variable ID: 20048 · Red Variable ID: 89
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0