Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the popularity of the name Jared waned, so did the demand for J-related novelty items. With fewer products like personalized keychains and license plate covers being sold, there was a noticeable decrease in unnecessary production and, consequently, a reduction in air pollution in Flint, Michigan. It's a breath of fresh air in more ways than one!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Realistic] Generate an image of a peaceful suburban street in Flint, Michigan during sunset. Show a small group of children playing outdoors, with boys riding their bikes down the street and calling out to one another. Depict the diminishing presence of children named Jared and the resulting reduction in air pollution, as the area transitions to a fresher, cleaner environment. Capture the warm glow of the setting sun and the sense of community in the neighborhood. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Cutsy art illustration Parallax art Brutalism Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Jared decreased, so did the number of people calling "Jared, stop air-polluting!" in Flint, Michigan. This led to a decrease in air pollution, as fewer Jareds were exhaling their toxic hot air, resulting in fresher, cleaner air for all.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet neighborhood in Flint, Michigan, a group of children played outside as the sun set. Among them, a few boys rode their bikes down the street, calling out to one another. As the popularity of the name Jared decreased, the number of kids calling "Jared, stop air-polluting!" also decreased. With fewer Jareds exhaling their toxic hot air, the air pollution in the area began to lessen, leading to fresher, cleaner air for everyone to enjoy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet neighborhood in Flint, Michigan, a group of children played outside as the sun set. Among them, a few boys rode their bikes down the street, calling out to one another. As the popularity of the name Jared decreased, the number of kids calling "Jared, stop air-polluting!" also decreased. With fewer Jareds exhaling their toxic hot air, the air pollution in the area began to lessen, leading to fresher, cleaner air for everyone to enjoy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Realistic] Generate an image of a peaceful suburban street in Flint, Michigan during sunset. Show a small group of children playing outdoors, with boys riding their bikes down the street and calling out to one another. Depict the diminishing presence of children named Jared and the resulting reduction in air pollution, as the area transitions to a fresher, cleaner environment. Capture the warm glow of the setting sun and the sense of community in the neighborhood.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Jared caused Air pollution in Flint, Michigan to decrease.
AI academic paper
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate The Journal of Ecological Epidemiology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Few would have conjectured that a correlation exists between the popularity of a name and the atmospheric composition of a specific geographic area. Nonetheless, the enigmatic allure of this purported linkage has spurred our zealous pursuit to unravel the confluence of Jareds and air pollution in the city of Flint, Michigan.
In the annals of scientific inquiry, the fusion of seemingly disparate variables often yields unexpected revelations. This research seeks to traverse the murky terrain at the juncture of etymology and environmental quality, bedecked with scatter plots, regression analyses, and a riveting dose of statistical acumen. As we embark on this expedition, our compass is calibrated by the guiding beacon of empirical evidence and our enthusiasm buoyed by the whimsical convolutions of academic investigation.
In this investigation, we endeavor to explicate the resonance of the name Jared and the composition of the Flint airscape. Resting upon a formidable foundation of data amassed from the US Social Security Administration, the moniker-centric inquiry intertwines with the quantitative tapestry of air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. Through this alchemical fusion of numerical rigor and lexical perspicacity, the hitherto nebulous relationship between Jared and air pollution shall be dragged into the effulgent light of scientific scrutiny.
The salience of this undertaking rests not merely on the discovery of a suggestive correlation, but on the implications for our understanding of sociolinguistic dynamics and environmental impact. As we chart the terrain of statistical significance and wander through the labyrinthine corridors of hypothesis testing, it behooves us to cast a bemused glance at the idiosyncrasies of scientific inquiry. Let us revel in the esoteric interplay of causality and nomenclature, for the whimsy that permeates this exploration is as palpable as the ozone-infused air carried upon the zephyrs of fate.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Few would have conjectured that a correlation exists between the popularity of a name and the atmospheric composition of a specific geographic area. Nonetheless, the enigmatic allure of this purported linkage has spurred our zealous pursuit to unravel the confluence of Jareds and air pollution in the city of Flint, Michigan.
In the annals of scientific inquiry, the fusion of seemingly disparate variables often yields unexpected revelations. This research seeks to traverse the murky terrain at the juncture of etymology and environmental quality, bedecked with scatter plots, regression analyses, and a riveting dose of statistical acumen. As we embark on this expedition, our compass is calibrated by the guiding beacon of empirical evidence and our enthusiasm buoyed by the whimsical convolutions of academic investigation.
In this investigation, we endeavor to explicate the resonance of the name Jared and the composition of the Flint airscape. Resting upon a formidable foundation of data amassed from the US Social Security Administration, the moniker-centric inquiry intertwines with the quantitative tapestry of air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. Through this alchemical fusion of numerical rigor and lexical perspicacity, the hitherto nebulous relationship between Jared and air pollution shall be dragged into the effulgent light of scientific scrutiny.
The salience of this undertaking rests not merely on the discovery of a suggestive correlation, but on the implications for our understanding of sociolinguistic dynamics and environmental impact. As we chart the terrain of statistical significance and wander through the labyrinthine corridors of hypothesis testing, it behooves us to cast a bemused glance at the idiosyncrasies of scientific inquiry. Let us revel in the esoteric interplay of causality and nomenclature, for the whimsy that permeates this exploration is as palpable as the ozone-infused air carried upon the zephyrs of fate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors investigate the curious relationship between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan. The study unveils a significant positive correlation, igniting scholarly bewilderment and an irrepressible urge to unearth the tantalizing underpinnings of this clandestine connection. The inscrutable entwining of Jareds and pollutant-laden breezes beckons for further exploration.
Doe and Jones delve into the nuances of environmental nomenclature in their seminal work, "Airborne Appellations: A Qualitative Analysis." The authors expound upon how the vibrational frequencies of consonants in names could potentially resonate with atmospheric pollutants, triggering a harmonious cacophony of airborne imbalances. The cacophony, much like the bristling consonants in "Jared," may reverberate through the cityscape, unsettling the very particles that compose the air.
Turning our attention to tangential scholarly contributions, "Environmental Linguistics: Lexical Ecologies and Phonetic Phenomena" by Green explores the lexical biodiversity of industrial cities and its potential impact on air quality. Could the acoustic vibrations of the name "Jared" carve ripples in the air, disturbing the molecular equilibrium at an imperceptible level? As we sift through the phonetic detritus, the answer to this enigma remains shrouded in mystery.
In the realm of fiction, the work of J.K. Rowling in the "Harry Potter" series introduces the concept of magical incantations shaping the surrounding environment. Could it be that within the urban milieu of Flint, an unspoken charm bearing the syllabic resonance of "Jared" casts a surreptitious spell on the air, cloaking it with a veil of unseen particles? Though whimsical, this analogy cannot be entirely dispelled, for the unexpected often lurks in the secret corners of reality.
Venturing further afield, the authors, in the quest for unconventional sources of insight, took inspiration from the back of shampoo bottles, where words like "refreshing" and "purifying" evoked tangential musings on the purview of air quality. While this unconventional approach raises eyebrows, it underscores the fortuitous interconnectedness of the seemingly mundane with the scholarly pursuit at hand.
In sum, the concatenation of Jared and atmospheric composition unfolds as a study in juxtaposition, fusing the stratosphere of rigorous inquiry with the whimsical zephyrs of irreverent exploration. As we plunge into the next section, armed with a sprinkling of hilarity and an arsenal of statistical rigor, the whimsy of this unique endeavor entreats us to tiptoe through the terra incognita of Jared and air pollution with a giddy spring in our step.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Few would have conjectured that a correlation exists between the popularity of a name and the atmospheric composition of a specific geographic area. Nonetheless, the enigmatic allure of this purported linkage has spurred our zealous pursuit to unravel the confluence of Jareds and air pollution in the city of Flint, Michigan.
In the annals of scientific inquiry, the fusion of seemingly disparate variables often yields unexpected revelations. This research seeks to traverse the murky terrain at the juncture of etymology and environmental quality, bedecked with scatter plots, regression analyses, and a riveting dose of statistical acumen. As we embark on this expedition, our compass is calibrated by the guiding beacon of empirical evidence and our enthusiasm buoyed by the whimsical convolutions of academic investigation.
In this investigation, we endeavor to explicate the resonance of the name Jared and the composition of the Flint airscape. Resting upon a formidable foundation of data amassed from the US Social Security Administration, the moniker-centric inquiry intertwines with the quantitative tapestry of air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. Through this alchemical fusion of numerical rigor and lexical perspicacity, the hitherto nebulous relationship between Jared and air pollution shall be dragged into the effulgent light of scientific scrutiny.
The salience of this undertaking rests not merely on the discovery of a suggestive correlation, but on the implications for our understanding of sociolinguistic dynamics and environmental impact. As we chart the terrain of statistical significance and wander through the labyrinthine corridors of hypothesis testing, it behooves us to cast a bemused glance at the idiosyncrasies of scientific inquiry. Let us revel in the esoteric interplay of causality and nomenclature, for the whimsy that permeates this exploration is as palpable as the ozone-infused air carried upon the zephyrs of fate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Statistical analysis in this study was as intricate as navigating through a maze with a pocket calculator and a bag of mixed nuts for sustenance. To commence our pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic corollary between the name Jared and air quality, we harnessed the exhaustive dataset from the US Social Security Administration (SSA). The SSA repository provided us with the number of newborns christened with the name Jared from 1980 to 2022, a treasure trove of nomenclatural trends ready for inspection. Armed with our buoyant curiosity and an excessive supply of caffeinated beverages, we endeavored to parse the undulating contours of Jared's popularity across the decades.
Amidst our intrepid foray into moniker magnitudes, we leveraged the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) air quality measurements in Flint, Michigan. These data embodied the intricate symphony of atmospheric composition, replete with the potent notes of pollutants and atmospheric accoutrements. Our rendezvous with the labyrinthine corridors of statistical acumen assuredly required fortitude, tenacity, and a remarkable ability to resist the siren call of social media distractions.
To ascertain the association between the eponymous Jared and the ambient airscape, we employed robust regression analyses and correlation coefficients. Our statistical endeavors were as rigorous as a gym enthusiast's training regimen, rigorously flexing and bending our formulas to unfurl the nuances of this unexpected fusion of sociolinguistics and atmospheric foibles. Through these statistical maneuvers, we sought to distill the essence of correlation, teasing out the purported links between Jared's ascendancy and the aerial plumes of Flint.
Next, we performed a series of hypothesis tests to evaluate the significance of the observed correlation. Our excursions into the tantalizing realm of p-values and confidence intervals were akin to a relentless quest for a pot of gold at the end of an erudite rainbow. The piquant interplay between statistical significance and whimsical inquiries into nomenclatural dynamics propelled us into an ethereal realm of intellectual ardor, replete with spreadsheets and abstruse dialogues with our favored statistical software.
In essence, with the confluence of moniker-centric inquiry and environmental metrics, we embarked on a journey that echoed with the playful hum of statistical machinery and the robust clangor of intellectual inquiry. Our methods employed in this study, akin to a quixotic ballet, deftly pirouetted through the terrain of data analytics and linguistic pertinence, embracing the serendipitous charm that infuses the fusion of sociology and environmental analysis.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .
For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6816299, r-squared of 0.4646193, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Few would have conjectured that a correlation exists between the popularity of a name and the atmospheric composition of a specific geographic area. Nonetheless, the enigmatic allure of this purported linkage has spurred our zealous pursuit to unravel the confluence of Jareds and air pollution in the city of Flint, Michigan.
In the annals of scientific inquiry, the fusion of seemingly disparate variables often yields unexpected revelations. This research seeks to traverse the murky terrain at the juncture of etymology and environmental quality, bedecked with scatter plots, regression analyses, and a riveting dose of statistical acumen. As we embark on this expedition, our compass is calibrated by the guiding beacon of empirical evidence and our enthusiasm buoyed by the whimsical convolutions of academic investigation.
In this investigation, we endeavor to explicate the resonance of the name Jared and the composition of the Flint airscape. Resting upon a formidable foundation of data amassed from the US Social Security Administration, the moniker-centric inquiry intertwines with the quantitative tapestry of air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. Through this alchemical fusion of numerical rigor and lexical perspicacity, the hitherto nebulous relationship between Jared and air pollution shall be dragged into the effulgent light of scientific scrutiny.
The salience of this undertaking rests not merely on the discovery of a suggestive correlation, but on the implications for our understanding of sociolinguistic dynamics and environmental impact. As we chart the terrain of statistical significance and wander through the labyrinthine corridors of hypothesis testing, it behooves us to cast a bemused glance at the idiosyncrasies of scientific inquiry. Let us revel in the esoteric interplay of causality and nomenclature, for the whimsy that permeates this exploration is as palpable as the ozone-infused air carried upon the zephyrs of fate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Jared and the levels of air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Over the time span from 1980 to 2022, we found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6816299, reflecting a strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution in the vicinity. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4646193 further underscores the explanatory power of the correlation, suggesting that almost 47% of the variability in air pollution levels can be elucidated by the prevalence of the name Jared. The statistical significance, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the reliability of the correlation, reaffirming the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot encapsulates the salient correlation between the prevalence of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution levels. The data points coalesce into a discernible positive trend, elucidating the confluence of nomenclature and environmental quality. As the popularity of the name Jared waxes, so does the atmospheric concentration of various pollutants, creating an intriguing narrative that warrants further exploration.
These findings, while unexpected, offer a whimsical insight into the symbiotic relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena. The correlation, like an elusive and capricious zephyr, defies conventional wisdom and invites contemplation of the hitherto unexplored interplay between personal nomenclature and atmospheric composition. These results shed light on the caprice of fate and the meandering pathways of causality, reminding us that beneath the seemingly mundane lies a world of quirky correlations and inexplicable associations, awaiting the discerning gaze of scientific inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors investigate the curious relationship between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan. The study unveils a significant positive correlation, igniting scholarly bewilderment and an irrepressible urge to unearth the tantalizing underpinnings of this clandestine connection. The inscrutable entwining of Jareds and pollutant-laden breezes beckons for further exploration.
Doe and Jones delve into the nuances of environmental nomenclature in their seminal work, "Airborne Appellations: A Qualitative Analysis." The authors expound upon how the vibrational frequencies of consonants in names could potentially resonate with atmospheric pollutants, triggering a harmonious cacophony of airborne imbalances. The cacophony, much like the bristling consonants in "Jared," may reverberate through the cityscape, unsettling the very particles that compose the air.
Turning our attention to tangential scholarly contributions, "Environmental Linguistics: Lexical Ecologies and Phonetic Phenomena" by Green explores the lexical biodiversity of industrial cities and its potential impact on air quality. Could the acoustic vibrations of the name "Jared" carve ripples in the air, disturbing the molecular equilibrium at an imperceptible level? As we sift through the phonetic detritus, the answer to this enigma remains shrouded in mystery.
In the realm of fiction, the work of J.K. Rowling in the "Harry Potter" series introduces the concept of magical incantations shaping the surrounding environment. Could it be that within the urban milieu of Flint, an unspoken charm bearing the syllabic resonance of "Jared" casts a surreptitious spell on the air, cloaking it with a veil of unseen particles? Though whimsical, this analogy cannot be entirely dispelled, for the unexpected often lurks in the secret corners of reality.
Venturing further afield, the authors, in the quest for unconventional sources of insight, took inspiration from the back of shampoo bottles, where words like "refreshing" and "purifying" evoked tangential musings on the purview of air quality. While this unconventional approach raises eyebrows, it underscores the fortuitous interconnectedness of the seemingly mundane with the scholarly pursuit at hand.
In sum, the concatenation of Jared and atmospheric composition unfolds as a study in juxtaposition, fusing the stratosphere of rigorous inquiry with the whimsical zephyrs of irreverent exploration. As we plunge into the next section, armed with a sprinkling of hilarity and an arsenal of statistical rigor, the whimsy of this unique endeavor entreats us to tiptoe through the terra incognita of Jared and air pollution with a giddy spring in our step.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Jared and the levels of air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Over the time span from 1980 to 2022, we found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6816299, reflecting a strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution in the vicinity. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4646193 further underscores the explanatory power of the correlation, suggesting that almost 47% of the variability in air pollution levels can be elucidated by the prevalence of the name Jared. The statistical significance, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the reliability of the correlation, reaffirming the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot encapsulates the salient correlation between the prevalence of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution levels. The data points coalesce into a discernible positive trend, elucidating the confluence of nomenclature and environmental quality. As the popularity of the name Jared waxes, so does the atmospheric concentration of various pollutants, creating an intriguing narrative that warrants further exploration.
These findings, while unexpected, offer a whimsical insight into the symbiotic relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena. The correlation, like an elusive and capricious zephyr, defies conventional wisdom and invites contemplation of the hitherto unexplored interplay between personal nomenclature and atmospheric composition. These results shed light on the caprice of fate and the meandering pathways of causality, reminding us that beneath the seemingly mundane lies a world of quirky correlations and inexplicable associations, awaiting the discerning gaze of scientific inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this research present a captivating dance between the ethereal tendrils of nomenclature and the palpable tendrils of air pollution. Our results correspond with previous scholarship, such as the study by Smith et al., which hinted at the elusive link between the prevalence of the name "Jared" and the atmospheric commotion in Flint, Michigan. Similarly, the work of Doe and Jones vividly illustrated how the consonantal resonance of "Jared" could plausibly resonate with the molecular harmonies of air pollutants, generating a symphony of unseen turbulence.
These results might seem as unexpected as uncovering a "hidden, nitrous oxide-laden valley" in the statistical landscape or as whimsical as a "light and airy" statistical model, but they echo the cryptic enigma that shrouds the union of nomenclature and atmosphere. Our findings capably buttress the prior research, establishing a robust correlation with a correlation coefficient approaching 0.7. It appears that the atmospheric milieu in Flint mirrors the undulating tides of Jared's popularity, creating a spectacle as inexplicable as the murky depths of a statistical well.
The statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, tingles with the exhilaration of a "serendipitous statistical sighting." The scatterplot paints a compelling narrative of the clandestine courtship between name frequencies and airborne molecules, weaving a tale as captivating as a "densely populated chemical compound of curiosity."
These results reveal a facet of the inquisitive universe, where the seemingly whimsical dance of nomenclature and air pollution is governed by the solemn laws of statistical rigor and the jovial caprice of academic exploration. The dual nature of this correlation prompts us to ponder the harmonious discord of empirical evidence and cognitive fancy, a riddle as engaging as "conducting a cantata of correlation coefficients in a concert hall of curiosity."
As we tiptoe through the confounding corridors of this peculiar correlation, it's prudent to nurture an irrepressible sense of wonder at the frivolous intricacies of statistical revelations and the clandestine harmonies of environmental titillation. These findings invite further inquiry into the contours of causality and the capricious meanderings of destiny, beckoning us to embark on an academic odyssey as whimsical and enigmatic as the confounding correlation between Jared and air pollution.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jared and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Few would have conjectured that a correlation exists between the popularity of a name and the atmospheric composition of a specific geographic area. Nonetheless, the enigmatic allure of this purported linkage has spurred our zealous pursuit to unravel the confluence of Jareds and air pollution in the city of Flint, Michigan.
In the annals of scientific inquiry, the fusion of seemingly disparate variables often yields unexpected revelations. This research seeks to traverse the murky terrain at the juncture of etymology and environmental quality, bedecked with scatter plots, regression analyses, and a riveting dose of statistical acumen. As we embark on this expedition, our compass is calibrated by the guiding beacon of empirical evidence and our enthusiasm buoyed by the whimsical convolutions of academic investigation.
In this investigation, we endeavor to explicate the resonance of the name Jared and the composition of the Flint airscape. Resting upon a formidable foundation of data amassed from the US Social Security Administration, the moniker-centric inquiry intertwines with the quantitative tapestry of air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. Through this alchemical fusion of numerical rigor and lexical perspicacity, the hitherto nebulous relationship between Jared and air pollution shall be dragged into the effulgent light of scientific scrutiny.
The salience of this undertaking rests not merely on the discovery of a suggestive correlation, but on the implications for our understanding of sociolinguistic dynamics and environmental impact. As we chart the terrain of statistical significance and wander through the labyrinthine corridors of hypothesis testing, it behooves us to cast a bemused glance at the idiosyncrasies of scientific inquiry. Let us revel in the esoteric interplay of causality and nomenclature, for the whimsy that permeates this exploration is as palpable as the ozone-infused air carried upon the zephyrs of fate.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name Jared and the levels of air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Over the time span from 1980 to 2022, we found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6816299, reflecting a strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution in the vicinity. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4646193 further underscores the explanatory power of the correlation, suggesting that almost 47% of the variability in air pollution levels can be elucidated by the prevalence of the name Jared. The statistical significance, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, attests to the reliability of the correlation, reaffirming the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot encapsulates the salient correlation between the prevalence of the name Jared and the ambient air pollution levels. The data points coalesce into a discernible positive trend, elucidating the confluence of nomenclature and environmental quality. As the popularity of the name Jared waxes, so does the atmospheric concentration of various pollutants, creating an intriguing narrative that warrants further exploration.
These findings, while unexpected, offer a whimsical insight into the symbiotic relationship between human nomenclature and environmental phenomena. The correlation, like an elusive and capricious zephyr, defies conventional wisdom and invites contemplation of the hitherto unexplored interplay between personal nomenclature and atmospheric composition. These results shed light on the caprice of fate and the meandering pathways of causality, reminding us that beneath the seemingly mundane lies a world of quirky correlations and inexplicable associations, awaiting the discerning gaze of scientific inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a captivating correlation between the prevalence of the first name Jared and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value lend credence to this whimsical association, evoking ponderous reflections on the whims of fate and atmospheric discord. The revelation of a nearly 47% explanatory power of the Jared variable in elucidating air pollution levels stands as a testament to the capricious interplay of nomenclature and environmental terroir. Figuratively speaking, the Jareds seem to exhale not only their names but also an ethereal concoction of pollutants into the Flint air, adding a layer of intrigue to the city's atmospheric narrative.
As we bid adieu to this rhapsodic meandering through the labyrinth of causality and find solace in the discernible correlation, it becomes increasingly apparent that further research in this domain is warranted – just as it is evident that a whole lot of Jareds are wafting a lot of curious air. However, for now, let us revel in the serendipitous confluence of Jareds and air pollution, for, as the quirk of scientific inquiry dictates, sometimes the most unconventional relationships yield the most intriguing revelations. In the words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call Jared by any other name would emit air pollutants alike."
Hence, we assert with the utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this rather peculiar area, as it seems that the air of Flint, Michigan, already carries an ample load of Jared-induced pollutants.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Ecological Epidemiology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Environmental Epidemiology and Urban Health
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate with an abstract of The link between the popularity of the name Jared and air pollution in Flint, Michigan has been a topic of contentious debate in recent years. This research aims to elucidate this curious relationship in a systematic manner, employing rigorous statistical analysis and an injection of humor to alleviate the tedium of academic writing.
Drawing from the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration and leveraging air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency, our findings reveal that the prevalence of the name Jared indeed exhibits a striking correlation with air pollution levels in Flint. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6816299 and a p-value below 0.01, the association is not to be scoffed at; it's as real as the air we breathe, allegedly containing more carbon dioxide, thanks to the multitude of Jareds.
While these discoveries may seem whimsical, they present valuable insights into the etymology of air pollution and nomenclatural trends. Could it be that the sheer force of Jareds in a community catalyzes the emission of pollutants? A question as confounding as it is captivating. Further research is warranted to delve into the intricate mechanisms at play, but for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unusual correlation and the fortuitous naming of the research team members.
ChatGPT:
Jared, air pollution, Flint, Michigan, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, statistical analysis, carbon dioxide, air quality, nomenclatural trends, etymology, pollutants, research team members
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name JaredDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jared
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jared
Air pollution in Flint, Michigan
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Flint, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Flint, Michigan
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.4646193 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 46.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Flint, Michigan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jared) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.9E-7. 0.0000004852455446448536000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.68 in 4.9E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,060,812 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.48, 0.82 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the first name Jared (Babies born) | 5244 | 5899 | 6310 | 5887 | 5725 | 5913 | 6144 | 6237 | 6250 | 7043 | 6662 | 6235 | 5878 | 6082 | 5890 | 5892 | 5838 | 6698 | 7477 | 7306 | 7343 | 6448 | 4847 | 3955 | 3194 | 2933 | 2986 | 2608 | 2045 | 1763 | 1448 | 1303 | 1200 | 1148 | 1198 | 1009 | 833 | 845 | 889 | 910 | 843 | 802 | 855 |
Air pollution in Flint, Michigan (Bad air quality days) | 5.68862 | 4.95868 | 10.0346 | 8.67924 | 8.4507 | 3.13901 | 4.64135 | 7.07965 | 14.9123 | 5.9322 | 7.98319 | 13.0802 | 3.75587 | 1.87793 | 6.19048 | 6.2201 | 8.57143 | 6.16114 | 15.4589 | 12.069 | 3.68852 | 11.3924 | 10.9705 | 8 | 2.00573 | 10.5485 | 2.05761 | 6.25 | 0.826446 | 0.829876 | 1.23967 | 3.30579 | 8.67769 | 0.420168 | 0.879765 | 0.840336 | 2.47253 | 0 | 0.828729 | 0 | 0.273224 | 0.821918 | 0.549451 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5244,5899,6310,5887,5725,5913,6144,6237,6250,7043,6662,6235,5878,6082,5890,5892,5838,6698,7477,7306,7343,6448,4847,3955,3194,2933,2986,2608,2045,1763,1448,1303,1200,1148,1198,1009,833,845,889,910,843,802,855,])
array_2 = np.array([5.68862,4.95868,10.0346,8.67924,8.4507,3.13901,4.64135,7.07965,14.9123,5.9322,7.98319,13.0802,3.75587,1.87793,6.19048,6.2201,8.57143,6.16114,15.4589,12.069,3.68852,11.3924,10.9705,8,2.00573,10.5485,2.05761,6.25,0.826446,0.829876,1.23967,3.30579,8.67769,0.420168,0.879765,0.840336,2.47253,0,0.828729,0,0.273224,0.821918,0.549451,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jared"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Flint, Michigan"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Jared
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Flint, Michigan
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Fateful Fate of Flint: The Correlation Between Jared and Air Pollution as a Spate
Cheers to you for rating this correlation!
Correlation ID: 2910 · Black Variable ID: 2093 · Red Variable ID: 20631