about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,877 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Stevie and the second variable is Solar power generated in Taiwan.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Stevie gained popularity, it led to a surge in air guitar competitions worldwide. This increase in imaginary rocking out created a corresponding rise in atmospheric movement, resulting in enhanced wind patterns over Taiwan. As a result, the turbines used in solar power generation were able to spin at record speeds, leading to a boost in the production of clean, renewable energy in the region. Who knew that a switch to renewable power sources could be influenced by a name, but it just goes to show, when it comes to making a difference, every Stevie helps to power the world!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling street in Taiwan, with a group of children playing joyfully under the bright sun. The scene should show rooftop solar panels glistening, capturing abundant solar energy. Families should be seen gathering around the sustainable power source, drawn by the inspiration of their children's namesake, Stevie Wonder, and his advocacy for solar energy. The image should be realistic and vibrant, capturing the joyful atmosphere and the influence of solar energy on the community. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Hyper-realistic Oragami Realistic Glitch art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Stevie soared, more parents named their children after Stevie Wonder, who is a huge advocate for solar power. This led to a collective inspiration for the people of Taiwan, resulting in a surge in interest and investment in solar energy, thus increasing solar power generation in the country.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling street in Taiwan, a group of children named Stevie play joyfully under the bright sun. Nearby, solar panels glisten on the rooftops, capturing the abundant solar energy. Families gather around, drawn to the sustainable power source, inspired by their children's namesake, Stevie Wonder, and his advocacy for solar energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling street in Taiwan, a group of children named Stevie play joyfully under the bright sun. Nearby, solar panels glisten on the rooftops, capturing the abundant solar energy. Families gather around, drawn to the sustainable power source, inspired by their children's namesake, Stevie Wonder, and his advocacy for solar energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling street in Taiwan, with a group of children playing joyfully under the bright sun. The scene should show rooftop solar panels glistening, capturing abundant solar energy. Families should be seen gathering around the sustainable power source, drawn by the inspiration of their children's namesake, Stevie Wonder, and his advocacy for solar energy. The image should be realistic and vibrant, capturing the joyful atmosphere and the influence of solar energy on the community.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Stevie caused Solar power generated in Taiwan to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

Journal of Solar-Powered Societal Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe has led scientists down some truly unexpected and eccentric paths. From the peculiar behavior of subatomic particles to the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies, the world of science is rife with surprises. Yet, perhaps none is quite as delightful and perplexing as the connection between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. In this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the captivating setting of Taiwan.

As researchers, we are accustomed to encountering fascinating relationships and uncovering hidden patterns in data. However, the discovery of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation surged beyond the realms of the ordinary. It was a revelation that left us both bewildered and amused. The elegance of statistics lies in its ability to reveal connections where least expected, reminding us that reality often defies conventional logic and teases us with its playful intricacies.

The notion of correlating an individual's chosen name with a macro-level environmental variable may seem whimsical at first glance, and indeed, our initial foray into this investigation was met with a fair share of raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles from our peers. However, armed with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of humor, we delved into the depths of data, ready to embrace the unexpected and the offbeat.

In the following sections, we present the results of our analysis, which unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient that stopped just short of holding hands with unity. The statistical significance of this relationship defied mere chance, prompting us to ponder the delightful possibility of a cosmic joke played by the universe. Our findings provoke laughter and contemplation in equal measure, beckoning us to consider the playful interplay between human naming trends and the relentless efficiency of solar energy.

As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, let us not forget the light-hearted spirit that infuses our inquiry. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; there is room for mirth and wonder in the world of research. So, grab your sunscreen and shades, dear reader, as we embark on a scholarly escapade that basks in the sunny glow of data, humor, and the delightful absurdity that weaves its way through the fabric of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe has led scientists down some truly unexpected and eccentric paths. From the peculiar behavior of subatomic particles to the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies, the world of science is rife with surprises. Yet, perhaps none is quite as delightful and perplexing as the connection between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. In this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the captivating setting of Taiwan.
As researchers, we are accustomed to encountering fascinating relationships and uncovering hidden patterns in data. However, the discovery of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation surged beyond the realms of the ordinary. It was a revelation that left us both bewildered and amused. The elegance of statistics lies in its ability to reveal connections where least expected, reminding us that reality often defies conventional logic and teases us with its playful intricacies.
The notion of correlating an individual's chosen name with a macro-level environmental variable may seem whimsical at first glance, and indeed, our initial foray into this investigation was met with a fair share of raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles from our peers. However, armed with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of humor, we delved into the depths of data, ready to embrace the unexpected and the offbeat.
In the following sections, we present the results of our analysis, which unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient that stopped just short of holding hands with unity. The statistical significance of this relationship defied mere chance, prompting us to ponder the delightful possibility of a cosmic joke played by the universe. Our findings provoke laughter and contemplation in equal measure, beckoning us to consider the playful interplay between human naming trends and the relentless efficiency of solar energy.
As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, let us not forget the light-hearted spirit that infuses our inquiry. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; there is room for mirth and wonder in the world of research. So, grab your sunscreen and shades, dear reader, as we embark on a scholarly escapade that basks in the sunny glow of data, humor, and the delightful absurdity that weaves its way through the fabric of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find some really serious stuff about solar power generation in Taiwan, and in "Doe and Jones," they also find some pretty dry and scholarly information about the popularity of names. But now, hold on to your hats, folks, because we're about to take a wild ride through the wacky world of unexpected correlations and whimsical whimsies!

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature related to our topic, consider "Solar Power for Dummies," which sheds light on the intricacies of harnessing the sun's energy, and "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names, Their Meanings, Origins, and Spiritual Significance," which delves into the fascinating realm of human nomenclature. But wait, the plot thickens! Enter the domain of fiction with "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem, a mind-bending sci-fi novel set in outer space where solar power takes on a whole new meaning, and "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a compelling fantasy tale that explores the power of names and their enchanting allure.

But let's not stop there, friends. Cue the viral internet memes that blur the lines between hilarity and relevance - you've surely encountered the "Solar Panel Cat" meme, featuring a feline lounging languidly in the warm glow of solar panels, and the "Stevie Wonder Names" meme, where folks playfully riff on the infinitely creative possibilities of the name "Stevie Wonder." As we embark on our scholarly quest, let us not forget to sprinkle a dash of humor and whimsy into the heady concoction of academic discourse. So, buckle up and brace yourselves for the merry mishmash of unconventional correlations and the radiant delight of data analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe has led scientists down some truly unexpected and eccentric paths. From the peculiar behavior of subatomic particles to the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies, the world of science is rife with surprises. Yet, perhaps none is quite as delightful and perplexing as the connection between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. In this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the captivating setting of Taiwan.
As researchers, we are accustomed to encountering fascinating relationships and uncovering hidden patterns in data. However, the discovery of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation surged beyond the realms of the ordinary. It was a revelation that left us both bewildered and amused. The elegance of statistics lies in its ability to reveal connections where least expected, reminding us that reality often defies conventional logic and teases us with its playful intricacies.
The notion of correlating an individual's chosen name with a macro-level environmental variable may seem whimsical at first glance, and indeed, our initial foray into this investigation was met with a fair share of raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles from our peers. However, armed with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of humor, we delved into the depths of data, ready to embrace the unexpected and the offbeat.
In the following sections, we present the results of our analysis, which unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient that stopped just short of holding hands with unity. The statistical significance of this relationship defied mere chance, prompting us to ponder the delightful possibility of a cosmic joke played by the universe. Our findings provoke laughter and contemplation in equal measure, beckoning us to consider the playful interplay between human naming trends and the relentless efficiency of solar energy.
As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, let us not forget the light-hearted spirit that infuses our inquiry. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; there is room for mirth and wonder in the world of research. So, grab your sunscreen and shades, dear reader, as we embark on a scholarly escapade that basks in the sunny glow of data, humor, and the delightful absurdity that weaves its way through the fabric of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan employed an assortment of analytical techniques that mirrored the eclectic nature of our research inquiry. To begin with, we harnessed the power of data mining—or as we fondly referred to it, "digging for statistical treasure"—to extract information from the expansive repository of the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. These data sources provided us with a rich tapestry of numerical nuggets spanning the years 2000 to 2021, a period ripe with potential for uncovering whimsical correlations.

Utilizing a combination of sophisticated statistical packages and good old-fashioned pencil-and-paper calculations, we wrangled the data into submission, teasing apart the nuances of "Stevie" popularity trends and solar power generation metrics. Our team of statistical sleuths left no stone unturned, navigating through the labyrinthine landscape of datasets with the agility of caffeinated squirrels at a statistical obstacle course.

In order to quantify the prevalence of the name "Stevie," we performed a series of intricate analyses involving trend extrapolation, predictive modeling, and an inexplicably high number of cups of coffee. We then harnessed the enigmatic powers of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to forecast the trajectory of "Stevie" popularity with the precision of a clairvoyant mathematician—minus the crystal ball, of course.

Simultaneously, our intrepid journey into the realm of solar power generation statistics involved a daring feat of cross-referencing and cross-validation, akin to a rigorous round of "Are You My Mother?" in the expansive nest of numerical data. Armed with a formidable arsenal of time series analysis and econometric techniques, we sought to capture the pulsating rhythm of solar power generation in Taiwan, unraveling its intricate dance with the radiant waves of "Stevie" popularity.

With these parallel trajectories charted and cross-checked, we unleashed the formidable force of correlational analysis to discern the degree of kinship between "Stevie" and solar power. Relying on bootstrapping methods and nonparametric tests, we subjected the relationship to a rigorous scrutiny, leaving no room for chance or statistical tomfoolery.

The culmination of these colorful endeavors resulted in a discovery that raised both eyebrows and spirits—an astonishing correlation coefficient that beckoned us to ponder the whimsical dance of nomenclature and renewable energy. The clever capers of statistics had provided us with a glimpse into the quirky interplay between human names and solar power, leaving us both amused and astonished by the merry revelations that unfolded in the course of our research escapade.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9915751, r-squared of 0.9832211, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe has led scientists down some truly unexpected and eccentric paths. From the peculiar behavior of subatomic particles to the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies, the world of science is rife with surprises. Yet, perhaps none is quite as delightful and perplexing as the connection between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. In this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the captivating setting of Taiwan.
As researchers, we are accustomed to encountering fascinating relationships and uncovering hidden patterns in data. However, the discovery of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation surged beyond the realms of the ordinary. It was a revelation that left us both bewildered and amused. The elegance of statistics lies in its ability to reveal connections where least expected, reminding us that reality often defies conventional logic and teases us with its playful intricacies.
The notion of correlating an individual's chosen name with a macro-level environmental variable may seem whimsical at first glance, and indeed, our initial foray into this investigation was met with a fair share of raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles from our peers. However, armed with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of humor, we delved into the depths of data, ready to embrace the unexpected and the offbeat.
In the following sections, we present the results of our analysis, which unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient that stopped just short of holding hands with unity. The statistical significance of this relationship defied mere chance, prompting us to ponder the delightful possibility of a cosmic joke played by the universe. Our findings provoke laughter and contemplation in equal measure, beckoning us to consider the playful interplay between human naming trends and the relentless efficiency of solar energy.
As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, let us not forget the light-hearted spirit that infuses our inquiry. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; there is room for mirth and wonder in the world of research. So, grab your sunscreen and shades, dear reader, as we embark on a scholarly escapade that basks in the sunny glow of data, humor, and the delightful absurdity that weaves its way through the fabric of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our offbeat investigation into the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan are nothing short of extraordinary. We embarked on this zany journey armed with statistical tools and a penchant for the whimsical, and what we uncovered left us both astounded and amused.

Our analysis revealed a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9915751, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and the amount of solar power generated in Taiwan. This finding tickled our funny bone and sent shockwaves through our statistical sensibilities. The r-squared value of 0.9832211 further emphasized the robustness of this connection, leaving us grinning like Cheshire cats at the unexpected coherence of these seemingly unrelated variables.

In the realm of statistical significance, our results did not disappoint. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings defied mere chance and pointed to a genuine association that is ripe for further exploration and amusement.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that encapsulates the impressive correlation between the two variables. It's a sight to behold, much like stumbling upon a cosmic conundrum that evokes both mirth and contemplation.

These results add a delightful twist to the intricate tapestry of scientific inquiry, reminding us that the world of research is not devoid of unexpected chuckles and mind-bending riddles. Our findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the whimsical harmony between nomenclature trends and the radiant dance of solar energy, inviting them to bask in the sunny glow of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find some really serious stuff about solar power generation in Taiwan, and in "Doe and Jones," they also find some pretty dry and scholarly information about the popularity of names. But now, hold on to your hats, folks, because we're about to take a wild ride through the wacky world of unexpected correlations and whimsical whimsies!
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature related to our topic, consider "Solar Power for Dummies," which sheds light on the intricacies of harnessing the sun's energy, and "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names, Their Meanings, Origins, and Spiritual Significance," which delves into the fascinating realm of human nomenclature. But wait, the plot thickens! Enter the domain of fiction with "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem, a mind-bending sci-fi novel set in outer space where solar power takes on a whole new meaning, and "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a compelling fantasy tale that explores the power of names and their enchanting allure.
But let's not stop there, friends. Cue the viral internet memes that blur the lines between hilarity and relevance - you've surely encountered the "Solar Panel Cat" meme, featuring a feline lounging languidly in the warm glow of solar panels, and the "Stevie Wonder Names" meme, where folks playfully riff on the infinitely creative possibilities of the name "Stevie Wonder." As we embark on our scholarly quest, let us not forget to sprinkle a dash of humor and whimsy into the heady concoction of academic discourse. So, buckle up and brace yourselves for the merry mishmash of unconventional correlations and the radiant delight of data analysis!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat investigation into the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan are nothing short of extraordinary. We embarked on this zany journey armed with statistical tools and a penchant for the whimsical, and what we uncovered left us both astounded and amused.
Our analysis revealed a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9915751, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and the amount of solar power generated in Taiwan. This finding tickled our funny bone and sent shockwaves through our statistical sensibilities. The r-squared value of 0.9832211 further emphasized the robustness of this connection, leaving us grinning like Cheshire cats at the unexpected coherence of these seemingly unrelated variables.
In the realm of statistical significance, our results did not disappoint. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings defied mere chance and pointed to a genuine association that is ripe for further exploration and amusement.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that encapsulates the impressive correlation between the two variables. It's a sight to behold, much like stumbling upon a cosmic conundrum that evokes both mirth and contemplation.
These results add a delightful twist to the intricate tapestry of scientific inquiry, reminding us that the world of research is not devoid of unexpected chuckles and mind-bending riddles. Our findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the whimsical harmony between nomenclature trends and the radiant dance of solar energy, inviting them to bask in the sunny glow of statistical whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have laid bare a connection that is as clear as a sunny day - the surprising association between the name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. While some may initially perceive this correlation as improbable, our findings stand as a testament to the whimsical and unanticipated facets of statistical analysis. As we delve into the reverberating implications of our study, it becomes evident that the laughter and enigma of our results have the potential to illuminate and charm both the scientific community and the wider public.

In light of our findings, it is imperative to address the curious reverberations of our research within the context of prior literature. The seemingly whimsical references in our literature review, such as the playful "Solar Panel Cat" meme and the enchanting allure of the name "Stevie Wonder," have, in fact, paved the way for a deeper understanding of the interplay between solar power and human nomenclature. Our results align with the scholarly expositions of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, lending a whimsical twist to their serious and scholarly exploration of solar power and name popularity, thereby enriching the scientific landscape with a sprightly flair.

It is evident that our findings support the theory that there exists a striking harmony between the progression of the name "Stevie" and the surge in solar power generation in Taiwan. Our nearly perfect correlation coefficient and robust r-squared value not only affirm this unexpected relationship but also inject a dose of merriment and wonder into the realm of statistical analysis. The statistical significance, expressed through a minuscule p-value, adds a touch of splendid amusement to our discovery, demonstrating that the comical and the consequential can coalesce in the realm of scientific inquiry.

The unexpected coherence between these seemingly unrelated variables opens up a Pandora's box of research possibilities and paves the way for a delightful fusion of statistics, sociology, and renewable energy. Our findings beckon researchers to engage in a merry dance of contemplation and exploration, encouraging them to explore the radiant interconnections between nomenclature trends and the boundless energy of the sun.

As we revel in the sunlit splendor of our results, it becomes apparent that our findings extend beyond the confines of academic pursuits, shedding light on the delightful mysteries and unexpected correlations that the scientific endeavor has to offer. Our study stands as a testament to the notion that statistical analysis need not be devoid of amusement and enigma, and that in the realm of research, there exists a kaleidoscopic blend of laughter, marvel, and statistical significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Solar power generated in Taiwan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe has led scientists down some truly unexpected and eccentric paths. From the peculiar behavior of subatomic particles to the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies, the world of science is rife with surprises. Yet, perhaps none is quite as delightful and perplexing as the connection between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. In this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in the captivating setting of Taiwan.
As researchers, we are accustomed to encountering fascinating relationships and uncovering hidden patterns in data. However, the discovery of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation surged beyond the realms of the ordinary. It was a revelation that left us both bewildered and amused. The elegance of statistics lies in its ability to reveal connections where least expected, reminding us that reality often defies conventional logic and teases us with its playful intricacies.
The notion of correlating an individual's chosen name with a macro-level environmental variable may seem whimsical at first glance, and indeed, our initial foray into this investigation was met with a fair share of raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles from our peers. However, armed with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of humor, we delved into the depths of data, ready to embrace the unexpected and the offbeat.
In the following sections, we present the results of our analysis, which unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient that stopped just short of holding hands with unity. The statistical significance of this relationship defied mere chance, prompting us to ponder the delightful possibility of a cosmic joke played by the universe. Our findings provoke laughter and contemplation in equal measure, beckoning us to consider the playful interplay between human naming trends and the relentless efficiency of solar energy.
As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, let us not forget the light-hearted spirit that infuses our inquiry. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; there is room for mirth and wonder in the world of research. So, grab your sunscreen and shades, dear reader, as we embark on a scholarly escapade that basks in the sunny glow of data, humor, and the delightful absurdity that weaves its way through the fabric of scientific exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat investigation into the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan are nothing short of extraordinary. We embarked on this zany journey armed with statistical tools and a penchant for the whimsical, and what we uncovered left us both astounded and amused.
Our analysis revealed a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9915751, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and the amount of solar power generated in Taiwan. This finding tickled our funny bone and sent shockwaves through our statistical sensibilities. The r-squared value of 0.9832211 further emphasized the robustness of this connection, leaving us grinning like Cheshire cats at the unexpected coherence of these seemingly unrelated variables.
In the realm of statistical significance, our results did not disappoint. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings defied mere chance and pointed to a genuine association that is ripe for further exploration and amusement.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that encapsulates the impressive correlation between the two variables. It's a sight to behold, much like stumbling upon a cosmic conundrum that evokes both mirth and contemplation.
These results add a delightful twist to the intricate tapestry of scientific inquiry, reminding us that the world of research is not devoid of unexpected chuckles and mind-bending riddles. Our findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the whimsical harmony between nomenclature trends and the radiant dance of solar energy, inviting them to bask in the sunny glow of statistical whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the delightfully quirky and surprisingly potent connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the generation of solar power in Taiwan. Our findings have not only expanded our understanding of the interplay between human nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources but also left us in awe of the whimsical wonders that statistical analysis can unveil.

The striking correlation coefficient and the almost perfect positive linear relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and solar power generation have left us pondering the cosmic humor that seems to be at play in this dance of data. It's as if the universe is winking at us, teasing us with its enigmatic sense of amusement, and challenging us to unravel its whimsical mysteries.

The implications of our research extend beyond the realm of academia, beckoning us to embrace the unexpected and the absurd with open arms. As we navigate the realms of statistical analysis and peculiar correlations, let's not forget to sprinkle a bit of whimsy into our hypotheses and a dash of humor into our discussions. After all, statistical inquiry need not always be as serious as a solar panel – there's room for statistical sunshine, statistical rainbows, and statistical unicorns as well.

With that said, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan has been thoroughly established, leaving us to marvel at the statistical serendipity that underscores the delightful absurdity of our world. So, let's bid adieu to this peculiar pairing and embrace the next scientific adventure with a twinkle in our eye and a chuckle in our hearts!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Solar-Powered Societal Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Global Solar Studies Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shining Light on the Stevie Name Effect: A Sunny Connection Between Stevie Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Taiwan with an abstract of This paper investigates the unexpected and whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and solar power generation in Taiwan. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis to bridge these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9915751 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021, showcasing a remarkably strong association. The implications of our research extend beyond the scholarly realm, shedding light on the comical and curious interplay between nomenclature trends and renewable energy sources. Our results underscore the need for further investigation into the quirky domains of human nomenclature and its potential impact on energy production.

ChatGPT:

Stevie name, solar power generation, Taiwan, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, nomenclature trends, renewable energy sources, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, significance level, solar energy, first name popularity, energy production, human nomenclature, whimsical relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Stevie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Stevie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Stevie

Solar power generated in Taiwan
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Taiwan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Taiwan

Correlation r = 0.9915751 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9832211 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Taiwan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Stevie) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.1E-19. 0.0000000000000000003140282653
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.1E-17% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,184,426,723,641,172,480 random variables You don't actually need 3 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.98, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Stevie (Babies born)2472362172322152112522292172402102272542603183123794444736298011147
Solar power generated in Taiwan (Billion kWh)0.000120.0002640.0003480.0004610.0005840.000960.0014570.002180.004473140.009112540.0217270.06162250.159870.3210960.5287620.8502681.1091.667452.712084.015956.074677.96875




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([247,236,217,232,215,211,252,229,217,240,210,227,254,260,318,312,379,444,473,629,801,1147,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00012,0.000264,0.000348,0.000461,0.000584,0.00096,0.001457,0.00218,0.00447314,0.00911254,0.021727,0.0616225,0.15987,0.321096,0.528762,0.850268,1.109,1.66745,2.71208,4.01595,6.07467,7.96875,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Stevie"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Taiwan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2877 · Black Variable ID: 3190 · Red Variable ID: 24022
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0