Report an error
Solar power generated in Taiwan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.99 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sunny | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age | r=0.75 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Taiwan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)