Download png, svg
AI explanation
As air pollution in Albuquerque increased, more people sought refuge indoors. With limited entertainment options, they turned to browsing the internet. This led to an uptick in searches for 'who is prince william' as a way to pass the time. This is a prime example of how environmental factors can directly impact our curiosity about the British royal family.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures the high-tech setting of a futuristic Albuquerque skyline obscured by a dense layer of smog. Show people on the streets looking disoriented and confused due to the lack of oxygen. Additionally, depict locals frantically typing "Who is Prince William" on their smartphones to capture their confusion about the royal figure's identity amidst the polluted atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art High-tech inspired by bauhaus Photorealism Charcoal
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william', in the following situation: As air pollution in Albuquerque increased, locals' brains were starved of oxygen, causing confusion. The smoggy air led them to mix up their royal knowledge, leading to an increase in Google searches for "Who is Prince William." They just couldn't "clear the air" on his identity!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Albuquerque, the city skyline was shrouded in a thick layer of smog, with pollution hanging heavy in the air. People walking on the streets looked confused and disoriented due to the lack of oxygen. Meanwhile, on their smartphones, many locals were furiously typing in "Who is Prince William" into Google, their confusion evident as they struggled to clear the air on the royal figure's identity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Albuquerque, the city skyline was shrouded in a thick layer of smog, with pollution hanging heavy in the air. People walking on the streets looked confused and disoriented due to the lack of oxygen. Meanwhile, on their smartphones, many locals were furiously typing in "Who is Prince William" into Google, their confusion evident as they struggled to clear the air on the royal figure's identity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures the high-tech setting of a futuristic Albuquerque skyline obscured by a dense layer of smog. Show people on the streets looking disoriented and confused due to the lack of oxygen. Additionally, depict locals frantically typing "Who is Prince William" on their smartphones to capture their confusion about the royal figure's identity amidst the polluted atmosphere.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Albuquerque caused who is prince william (Google searches for 'who is prince william') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William' The Journal of Atmospheric Inquiries Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Ladies and gentlemen, in a world filled with smog and searches, we embark on an enlightening journey to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution and public curiosity about the esteemed Prince William of the British royal family. While air pollution's notorious reputation for wreaking havoc on respiratory systems has long been documented, its dalliance with altering our online search patterns remains an unexplored frontier - until now.
As astute researchers with a penchant for the unexpected, we were struck by the tantalizing prospect of unearthing a correlation between inhaling the emissions of Albuquerque and typing queries about the Duke of Cambridge into the virtual realm. Behold, our study delves into the interplay between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the online proclivity for pondering 'who is Prince William.' Strikingly, the bowels of Google Trends and the troves of EPA data have yielded a revelation that has, dare we say, left us breathless with intrigue.
It's time to unravel the veil of mist that shrouds this unlikely association, and with the precision of a statistical scalpel, dissect the numbers that bear witness to this whimsical dance between particulate matters and princely inquiries. Amidst the statistical symphony that envelops this investigation, we are poised to reveal the dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, a figure that is enigmatic and mesmerizing as the royal subject of our fascination.
Armed with the tools of academia and a sprinkling of whimsy, we invite you to join us on this extraordinary expedition towards understanding the quixotic relationship between air pollution and the inquisitive digital whispers surrounding His Royal Highness. Let us navigate through the hazy horizon of data, while keeping an astute eye out for the unexpected curiosities that lay hidden within this seemingly whimsical correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, in a world filled with smog and searches, we embark on an enlightening journey to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution and public curiosity about the esteemed Prince William of the British royal family. While air pollution's notorious reputation for wreaking havoc on respiratory systems has long been documented, its dalliance with altering our online search patterns remains an unexplored frontier - until now.
As astute researchers with a penchant for the unexpected, we were struck by the tantalizing prospect of unearthing a correlation between inhaling the emissions of Albuquerque and typing queries about the Duke of Cambridge into the virtual realm. Behold, our study delves into the interplay between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the online proclivity for pondering 'who is Prince William.' Strikingly, the bowels of Google Trends and the troves of EPA data have yielded a revelation that has, dare we say, left us breathless with intrigue.
It's time to unravel the veil of mist that shrouds this unlikely association, and with the precision of a statistical scalpel, dissect the numbers that bear witness to this whimsical dance between particulate matters and princely inquiries. Amidst the statistical symphony that envelops this investigation, we are poised to reveal the dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, a figure that is enigmatic and mesmerizing as the royal subject of our fascination.
Armed with the tools of academia and a sprinkling of whimsy, we invite you to join us on this extraordinary expedition towards understanding the quixotic relationship between air pollution and the inquisitive digital whispers surrounding His Royal Highness. Let us navigate through the hazy horizon of data, while keeping an astute eye out for the unexpected curiosities that lay hidden within this seemingly whimsical correlation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between environmental factors and public behavior has long been a topic of interest to researchers, from the seminal works of Smith et al. (2005) on urban air pollution to the more recent investigations of Doe and Jones (2018) on internet search trends. However, the convergence of these two realms in the context of air pollution in Albuquerque and searches regarding the esteemed Prince William brings forth a unique and uncharted territory for scholarly exploration. As we traverse this uncharted territory, we encounter a plethora of literature that informs and shapes our understanding of this peculiar phenomenon.
In "The Air Pollution Crisis" by White (2010), the author expounds upon the deleterious effects of air pollution on human health, emphasizing the impact on respiratory ailments and overall well-being. This comprehensive examination of the subject sets the stage for considering the potential clandestine influence of air pollution on online search behavior – an underappreciated aspect that warrants further scrutiny.
Transitioning to the realm of online activity, Landers (2015) in "The Online Wilderness: Exploring Digital Territories" sheds light on the intricacies of internet search patterns and user behavior. While the focus of this work is broad, it underscores the importance of contextualizing online phenomena within the broader environmental and societal landscape, offering a framework for our exploration of the connection between air pollution and Google searches for 'who is Prince William.'
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the novel "The Air We Breathe" by Mist (2018) presents a fictionalized account of a world where air pollution triggers unforeseen and absurd consequences, offering a whimsical parallel to our investigation. Similarly, in the speculative work "Searches of the Crown: A Tale of Digital Curiosity" by Cloud (2019), the intertwining threads of online inquiries and royal intrigue permeate the narrative, providing an allegorical backdrop for our empirical pursuits.
As our pursuit of knowledge extends into unexpected realms, it is imperative to acknowledge the diversity of sources that have informed our understanding. From scholarly treatises to fanciful tales, each contributes its unique hue to the vibrant tapestry of our investigation. Even in the most unconventional of places, such as the backs of shampoo bottles adorned with royal proverbs, there exists the potential for enlightenment and amusement. Thus, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of knowledge and the serendipitous encounters that pave the way for discovery.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, in a world filled with smog and searches, we embark on an enlightening journey to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution and public curiosity about the esteemed Prince William of the British royal family. While air pollution's notorious reputation for wreaking havoc on respiratory systems has long been documented, its dalliance with altering our online search patterns remains an unexplored frontier - until now.
As astute researchers with a penchant for the unexpected, we were struck by the tantalizing prospect of unearthing a correlation between inhaling the emissions of Albuquerque and typing queries about the Duke of Cambridge into the virtual realm. Behold, our study delves into the interplay between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the online proclivity for pondering 'who is Prince William.' Strikingly, the bowels of Google Trends and the troves of EPA data have yielded a revelation that has, dare we say, left us breathless with intrigue.
It's time to unravel the veil of mist that shrouds this unlikely association, and with the precision of a statistical scalpel, dissect the numbers that bear witness to this whimsical dance between particulate matters and princely inquiries. Amidst the statistical symphony that envelops this investigation, we are poised to reveal the dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, a figure that is enigmatic and mesmerizing as the royal subject of our fascination.
Armed with the tools of academia and a sprinkling of whimsy, we invite you to join us on this extraordinary expedition towards understanding the quixotic relationship between air pollution and the inquisitive digital whispers surrounding His Royal Highness. Let us navigate through the hazy horizon of data, while keeping an astute eye out for the unexpected curiosities that lay hidden within this seemingly whimsical correlation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
Data Collection:
Given the uniquely whimsical nature of our research, we set out on an unorthodox journey through the digital realms to collect the necessary data. Our expedition led us to the illustrious Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the virtual oracle of curiosity, Google Trends. The EPA graciously provided us with air pollution data in Albuquerque, New Mexico, offering a glimpse into the intricate ballet of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants that grace the city's atmosphere. We mined Google Trends for the frequency of searches related to 'who is Prince William', capturing the ebb and flow of virtual tributes to the esteemed royal scion.
To ensure the breadth and depth of our data, we cast our metaphorical net far and wide, spanning the period from 2008 to 2023. This temporal expanse allowed us to encapsulate the evolution of both air pollution levels and public intrigue in the British royalty. The data, much like a fine wine, revealed its nuanced flavors over time, imparting a robustness to our analyses that would not have been possible within a narrower time frame.
Data Processing:
Upon procuring the raw data, we embarked on a convoluted journey of methodological refinement - a veritable alchemical process to distill the essence of our datasets. We invoked the mystical incantations of statistical software, coaxing the numbers into revealing their hidden truths. Through the crucible of data processing, we reconciled the diverse formats of EPA's atmospheric musings and Google Trend's virtual memoirs, harmonizing them into a symphony of information.
Statistical Analysis:
Like a musical conductor orchestrating a grand opus, we wielded an assortment of statistical tools to tease out the relationship between air pollution and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. The Pearson correlation coefficient emerged as our loyal companion, guiding us through the undulating terrain of numerical enigma. With each keystroke and every algorithmic whisper, we unveiled the statistical tapestry that interwove air pollution levels with the public's thirst for regal knowledge.
It is worth noting that throughout this process, we exercised the utmost caution in navigating the labyrinth of statistical inference. We remained vigilant against the siren call of spurious correlations and the lurking specter of confounding variables, ensuring the integrity and robustness of our analyses.
Ethical Considerations:
In our pursuit of knowledge, we remained steadfast in our ethical compass, treating the data with the reverence due to its intrinsic value. We safeguarded the privacy of individual search patterns, cloaking them in a shroud of anonymity, while upholding the sanctity of scientific inquiry.
In summary, our methodological approach, while imbued with a dash of whimsy, adhered to the rigorous standards of empirical inquiry. We harnessed the serendipitous synergy of diverse datasets and deployed the analytical arsenal of statistical tools, culminating in a symphonic crescendo of correlation and insight. With our compass pointed toward the uncharted territories of scientific curiosity, we stand ready to unveil the peculiar dance between air pollution and princely queries, primed to delight and astound the discerning reader.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .
For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8268579, r-squared of 0.6836939, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, in a world filled with smog and searches, we embark on an enlightening journey to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution and public curiosity about the esteemed Prince William of the British royal family. While air pollution's notorious reputation for wreaking havoc on respiratory systems has long been documented, its dalliance with altering our online search patterns remains an unexplored frontier - until now.
As astute researchers with a penchant for the unexpected, we were struck by the tantalizing prospect of unearthing a correlation between inhaling the emissions of Albuquerque and typing queries about the Duke of Cambridge into the virtual realm. Behold, our study delves into the interplay between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the online proclivity for pondering 'who is Prince William.' Strikingly, the bowels of Google Trends and the troves of EPA data have yielded a revelation that has, dare we say, left us breathless with intrigue.
It's time to unravel the veil of mist that shrouds this unlikely association, and with the precision of a statistical scalpel, dissect the numbers that bear witness to this whimsical dance between particulate matters and princely inquiries. Amidst the statistical symphony that envelops this investigation, we are poised to reveal the dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, a figure that is enigmatic and mesmerizing as the royal subject of our fascination.
Armed with the tools of academia and a sprinkling of whimsy, we invite you to join us on this extraordinary expedition towards understanding the quixotic relationship between air pollution and the inquisitive digital whispers surrounding His Royal Highness. Let us navigate through the hazy horizon of data, while keeping an astute eye out for the unexpected curiosities that lay hidden within this seemingly whimsical correlation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
**RESULTS**
The analysis of the data yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and the public's intrigue with the royal lineage of Prince William. This finding speaks to the intricate interplay between environmental factors and the web of human curiosity, intertwining in an unexpected duet across the digital domain.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6836939 suggests that approximately 68.37% of the variation in Google searches for 'who is Prince William' can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This statistical tidbit serves as a gentle reminder of the nuanced dance between the ethereal realm of online queries and the tangible haze that permeates the physical atmosphere.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lends further credence to the strength of the relationship uncovered by our analysis, standing as a resolute testament to the significance of this peculiar association.
[Fig. 1: The scatterplot depicting the pronounced correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'.]
This unanticipated correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate web of human behavior and the ever-surprising ways in which environmental influences can seep into the digital sphere. It beckons us to ponder the ephemeral nature of human curiosity, as it pirouettes amidst the atmospheric particles in a ballet of intrigue and pollution.
In the wake of these unforeseen findings, the implications are manifold and call for a deeper exploration of the multifaceted intersections between online behavior and environmental exposures. This unearths a Pandora's box of questions, sparking curiosity akin to that which led to our initial investigation.
The unexpected nature of these results serves as a poignant reminder of the beguiling wonders that lie within the realm of scientific inquiry, challenging us to embrace the serendipitous revelations that arise when data and curiosity collide.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between environmental factors and public behavior has long been a topic of interest to researchers, from the seminal works of Smith et al. (2005) on urban air pollution to the more recent investigations of Doe and Jones (2018) on internet search trends. However, the convergence of these two realms in the context of air pollution in Albuquerque and searches regarding the esteemed Prince William brings forth a unique and uncharted territory for scholarly exploration. As we traverse this uncharted territory, we encounter a plethora of literature that informs and shapes our understanding of this peculiar phenomenon.
In "The Air Pollution Crisis" by White (2010), the author expounds upon the deleterious effects of air pollution on human health, emphasizing the impact on respiratory ailments and overall well-being. This comprehensive examination of the subject sets the stage for considering the potential clandestine influence of air pollution on online search behavior – an underappreciated aspect that warrants further scrutiny.
Transitioning to the realm of online activity, Landers (2015) in "The Online Wilderness: Exploring Digital Territories" sheds light on the intricacies of internet search patterns and user behavior. While the focus of this work is broad, it underscores the importance of contextualizing online phenomena within the broader environmental and societal landscape, offering a framework for our exploration of the connection between air pollution and Google searches for 'who is Prince William.'
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the novel "The Air We Breathe" by Mist (2018) presents a fictionalized account of a world where air pollution triggers unforeseen and absurd consequences, offering a whimsical parallel to our investigation. Similarly, in the speculative work "Searches of the Crown: A Tale of Digital Curiosity" by Cloud (2019), the intertwining threads of online inquiries and royal intrigue permeate the narrative, providing an allegorical backdrop for our empirical pursuits.
As our pursuit of knowledge extends into unexpected realms, it is imperative to acknowledge the diversity of sources that have informed our understanding. From scholarly treatises to fanciful tales, each contributes its unique hue to the vibrant tapestry of our investigation. Even in the most unconventional of places, such as the backs of shampoo bottles adorned with royal proverbs, there exists the potential for enlightenment and amusement. Thus, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of knowledge and the serendipitous encounters that pave the way for discovery.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and the public's intrigue with the royal lineage of Prince William. This finding speaks to the intricate interplay between environmental factors and the web of human curiosity, intertwining in an unexpected duet across the digital domain.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6836939 suggests that approximately 68.37% of the variation in Google searches for 'who is Prince William' can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This statistical tidbit serves as a gentle reminder of the nuanced dance between the ethereal realm of online queries and the tangible haze that permeates the physical atmosphere.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lends further credence to the strength of the relationship uncovered by our analysis, standing as a resolute testament to the significance of this peculiar association.
[Fig. 1: The scatterplot depicting the pronounced correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'.]
This unanticipated correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate web of human behavior and the ever-surprising ways in which environmental influences can seep into the digital sphere. It beckons us to ponder the ephemeral nature of human curiosity, as it pirouettes amidst the atmospheric particles in a ballet of intrigue and pollution.
In the wake of these unforeseen findings, the implications are manifold and call for a deeper exploration of the multifaceted intersections between online behavior and environmental exposures. This unearths a Pandora's box of questions, sparking curiosity akin to that which led to our initial investigation.
The unexpected nature of these results serves as a poignant reminder of the beguiling wonders that lie within the realm of scientific inquiry, challenging us to embrace the serendipitous revelations that arise when data and curiosity collide.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The remarkable findings of our study reveal a hitherto unexplored linkage between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the public's fervent inquisition into the affairs of the British royal family. The robust correlation and p-value less than 0.01 lend credence to the unexpected yet undeniable bond between atmospheric pollution and digital curiosity, a synchrony as enigmatic as the dance of electrons in a molecular orchestra.
The literature review, with its whimsical yet revelatory forays into unconventional sources, provided a fertile ground for contextualizing our unanticipated results. The ambient whimsy of the fictional work "The Air We Breathe" by Mist (2018) and the allegorical musings in "Searches of the Crown: A Tale of Digital Curiosity" by Cloud (2019) foreshadowed the surreal nexus we encountered between air pollution and searches for royal lineage. Not to mention, the exuberant spirit of the shampoo bottles' regal proverbs instilled a sense of regal air amidst the mundane milieu of literature review. The findings of our study resonate with these unexpected sources, underscoring the peculiarity of our discovery and its seamless integration within the tapestry of intellectual pursuits.
While the connection between air pollution and online search behavior may at first glance appear whimsical, the statistical rigor of our analysis unearths a compelling harmony – or perhaps discord – between these seemingly divergent domains. The pronounced r-squared value buttresses our contention that a substantial fraction of the variance in Google searches for 'who is Prince William' can be illuminated by the fluctuations in air pollution levels, evoking thoughts akin to the serendipitous encounters of particles in quantum indeterminacy. Such statistical revelations embody the exquisite choreography of empirical inquiry, mirroring the intricate patterns woven at the nexus of human curiosity and environmental influence.
The assemblage of our results verges on the surreal, eluding conventional models of human behavior and environmental impact. It beckons us to embrace the capricious capers of scientific investigation, where the most unlikely accomplices – in this case, air pollution and princely intrigue – conspire to divulge their mysterious entanglements. In the wake of this unorthodox insight, we stand at the precipice of uncharted inquiry, tantalizingly close to unraveling the enigma of how atmospheric whispers sculpt the contours of digital curiosity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Albuquerque and Google searches for 'who is prince william'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
[[ABSTRACT]]
Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, in a world filled with smog and searches, we embark on an enlightening journey to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution and public curiosity about the esteemed Prince William of the British royal family. While air pollution's notorious reputation for wreaking havoc on respiratory systems has long been documented, its dalliance with altering our online search patterns remains an unexplored frontier - until now.
As astute researchers with a penchant for the unexpected, we were struck by the tantalizing prospect of unearthing a correlation between inhaling the emissions of Albuquerque and typing queries about the Duke of Cambridge into the virtual realm. Behold, our study delves into the interplay between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the online proclivity for pondering 'who is Prince William.' Strikingly, the bowels of Google Trends and the troves of EPA data have yielded a revelation that has, dare we say, left us breathless with intrigue.
It's time to unravel the veil of mist that shrouds this unlikely association, and with the precision of a statistical scalpel, dissect the numbers that bear witness to this whimsical dance between particulate matters and princely inquiries. Amidst the statistical symphony that envelops this investigation, we are poised to reveal the dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, a figure that is enigmatic and mesmerizing as the royal subject of our fascination.
Armed with the tools of academia and a sprinkling of whimsy, we invite you to join us on this extraordinary expedition towards understanding the quixotic relationship between air pollution and the inquisitive digital whispers surrounding His Royal Highness. Let us navigate through the hazy horizon of data, while keeping an astute eye out for the unexpected curiosities that lay hidden within this seemingly whimsical correlation.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and the public's intrigue with the royal lineage of Prince William. This finding speaks to the intricate interplay between environmental factors and the web of human curiosity, intertwining in an unexpected duet across the digital domain.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6836939 suggests that approximately 68.37% of the variation in Google searches for 'who is Prince William' can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This statistical tidbit serves as a gentle reminder of the nuanced dance between the ethereal realm of online queries and the tangible haze that permeates the physical atmosphere.
The p-value of less than 0.01 lends further credence to the strength of the relationship uncovered by our analysis, standing as a resolute testament to the significance of this peculiar association.
[Fig. 1: The scatterplot depicting the pronounced correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'.]
This unanticipated correlation prompts contemplation on the intricate web of human behavior and the ever-surprising ways in which environmental influences can seep into the digital sphere. It beckons us to ponder the ephemeral nature of human curiosity, as it pirouettes amidst the atmospheric particles in a ballet of intrigue and pollution.
In the wake of these unforeseen findings, the implications are manifold and call for a deeper exploration of the multifaceted intersections between online behavior and environmental exposures. This unearths a Pandora's box of questions, sparking curiosity akin to that which led to our initial investigation.
The unexpected nature of these results serves as a poignant reminder of the beguiling wonders that lie within the realm of scientific inquiry, challenging us to embrace the serendipitous revelations that arise when data and curiosity collide.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a robust relationship between air pollution levels in Albuquerque and the public's interest in the esteemed Prince William, leaving us breathless with intrigue. As we navigate the convoluted maze of statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the dance between environmental factors and online curiosity is as captivating as witnessing a double helix unravel in real-time.
The significant correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 stands as a testament to the inexplicable interplay between the haze that veils the air and the enigmatic web searches for the royal scion. However, we must tread lightly, for this eerie association may lead to the rise of a new field – atmospheric psychology, where the whims of the wind become intertwined with the mysteries of the mind.
Nonetheless, as we bid adieu to this enthralling expedition, we are convinced that no further exploration in this area is necessary - the confluence of air pollution and Prince William's internet fame has been sufficiently, and perhaps excessively, elucidated. Let us leave this unlikely union to exist in the annals of serendipitous scientific discoveries, standing as a quirky anecdote that we fondly embrace in our noble pursuits of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Atmospheric Inquiries
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Atmospheric Princeology Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William' with an abstract of Exposure to air pollution has been associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, but its potential impact on internet search behavior remains understudied. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring the connection between air pollution levels in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Google searches for 'who is Prince William'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2023. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8268579 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between air pollution and public interest in the British royal family. We discuss the implications of these unexpected results and propose further avenues of investigation to elucidate this peculiar phenomenon.
ChatGPT:
Air pollution, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Google searches, Prince William, internet search behavior, Environmental Protection Agency, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, British royal family, public interest, adverse health outcomes
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in AlbuquerqueDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Albuquerque, NM
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Albuquerque
Google searches for 'who is prince william'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is prince william' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is prince william'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6836939 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'who is prince william') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Albuquerque) over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.81E-5. 0.0000780911573073408500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00781% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,806 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.56, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Air pollution in Albuquerque (Bad air quality days) | 1.63934 | 0.821918 | 1.36986 | 7.67123 | 6.8306 | 2.46575 | 0.273973 | 1.09589 | 0.819672 | 1.09589 | 6.57534 | 1.09589 | 2.73224 | 5.75342 | 9.0411 | 4.94506 |
Google searches for 'who is prince william' (Rel. search volume) | 1.41667 | 1.41667 | 3.08333 | 11.8333 | 3.41667 | 3.66667 | 2.5 | 3.16667 | 3.25 | 4.16667 | 6.83333 | 4.41667 | 5.83333 | 6.75 | 14.75 | 7.08333 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.63934,0.821918,1.36986,7.67123,6.8306,2.46575,0.273973,1.09589,0.819672,1.09589,6.57534,1.09589,2.73224,5.75342,9.0411,4.94506,])
array_2 = np.array([1.41667,1.41667,3.08333,11.8333,3.41667,3.66667,2.5,3.16667,3.25,4.16667,6.83333,4.41667,5.83333,6.75,14.75,7.08333,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Albuquerque"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'who is prince william'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Albuquerque
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'who is prince william'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: A Breath of Fresh Heir: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Albuquerque and Google Searches for 'Who is Prince William'
You're the correlation whisperer we needed!
Correlation ID: 2863 · Black Variable ID: 20246 · Red Variable ID: 1443