about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,844 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the second variable is Kerosene used in Vietnam.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the demand for non-GMO cotton in North Carolina increased, farmers there had to switch to old-fashioned kerosene lamps to inspect their crops at night, leading to a sudden spike in local kerosene consumption. This unexpected shift in lighting methods caught the attention of kerosene traders in Vietnam, prompting them to cut back on their own kerosene usage in a bid to save the precious resource for future generations. It's a classic case of agricultural decision-making sparking a luminous chain reaction halfway across the globe!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a picturesque cotton field in North Carolina, where skilled pickers are carefully harvesting non-GMO cotton using traditional methods. At the same time, in Vietnam, these pickers are seen working together to gather coconuts without the need for kerosene impregnation. The image should capture the vibrant green fields and the hardworking pickers, showcasing the positive impact of reducing GMO cotton and kerosene usage. The emphasis should be on the natural beauty of the fields and the diligent workers in both locations. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' A Discovery magazine cover image A scene from Skyrim Cutsy graphics Vaporwave
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam, in the following situation: Because as North Carolina decreased GMO cotton, it led to a surplus of non-GMO cotton, creating a demand for traditional cotton-picking methods. This increased the availability of skilled pickers who were then recruited to Vietnam to help pick kerosene-impregnated coconuts, thus reducing the need for kerosene production. It's a real pick-me-up story!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a North Carolina cotton field, a group of skilled pickers carefully harvests non-GMO cotton using traditional methods. Meanwhile, in Vietnam, these same pickers are now working together to gather coconuts without the need for kerosene impregnation. The sight of the vibrant green fields and the hardworking pickers is a remarkable testament to the positive impact of reducing GMO cotton and kerosene usage.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a North Carolina cotton field, a group of skilled pickers carefully harvests non-GMO cotton using traditional methods. Meanwhile, in Vietnam, these same pickers are now working together to gather coconuts without the need for kerosene impregnation. The sight of the vibrant green fields and the hardworking pickers is a remarkable testament to the positive impact of reducing GMO cotton and kerosene usage. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a picturesque cotton field in North Carolina, where skilled pickers are carefully harvesting non-GMO cotton using traditional methods. At the same time, in Vietnam, these pickers are seen working together to gather coconuts without the need for kerosene impregnation. The image should capture the vibrant green fields and the hardworking pickers, showcasing the positive impact of reducing GMO cotton and kerosene usage. The emphasis should be on the natural beauty of the fields and the diligent workers in both locations.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in North Carolina caused Kerosene used in Vietnam to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

The International Journal of Transdisciplinary Agricultural Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of agricultural research and energy consumption may seem worlds apart, like trying to mix oil and water -- or in this case, kerosene and cotton. However, as we delve into the heart of this paper, be prepared to witness a web of interconnectedness that would make even the most skilled spider blush with envy. We are about to unravel a curious conundrum that's as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack.

While the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation may not immediately conjure images of kerosene consumption in Vietnam, our investigation has unearthed a connection that stands out like a sore thumb – or a ripe cotton bale in a field. We recently found ourselves pondering whether there's more to this relationship than mere coincidence – could they have more in common than being just two peas in a pod?

Our research is not without its fair share of mind-bending surprises and unexpected turns, akin to a thrilling rollercoaster ride. As we analyze the data, we invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating journey that might just make your head spin faster than an unexpected plot twist in a novel.

So stick with us as we entertain the seemingly improbable notion that GMOs and kerosene are like the culinary duo of peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven. Get ready for a wild scholarly ride as we present our findings that promise to leave you both awestruck and a few chuckles richer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural research and energy consumption may seem worlds apart, like trying to mix oil and water -- or in this case, kerosene and cotton. However, as we delve into the heart of this paper, be prepared to witness a web of interconnectedness that would make even the most skilled spider blush with envy. We are about to unravel a curious conundrum that's as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack.
While the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation may not immediately conjure images of kerosene consumption in Vietnam, our investigation has unearthed a connection that stands out like a sore thumb – or a ripe cotton bale in a field. We recently found ourselves pondering whether there's more to this relationship than mere coincidence – could they have more in common than being just two peas in a pod?
Our research is not without its fair share of mind-bending surprises and unexpected turns, akin to a thrilling rollercoaster ride. As we analyze the data, we invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating journey that might just make your head spin faster than an unexpected plot twist in a novel.
So stick with us as we entertain the seemingly improbable notion that GMOs and kerosene are like the culinary duo of peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven. Get ready for a wild scholarly ride as we present our findings that promise to leave you both awestruck and a few chuckles richer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have delved into the intricacies of genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in agriculture, with a particular focus on its application in cotton cultivation. Smith (2015) examines the impact of GMO technology on crop yields and economic outcomes in cotton production, highlighting its potential to revolutionize the agricultural landscape. Similarly, Doe (2018) explores the environmental implications of GMO adoption in cotton farming, shedding light on the complex interplay between biotechnology and sustainability.

However, as we transition from the serious realm of scholarly research to the realm of unexpected correlations, it is worth noting that our inquiry ventured into uncharted territory reminiscent of the novels "The Cotton Patch Gospel" by Clarence Jordan and "Kerosene" by Chris Wooding. While these books may not directly pertain to our topic and will certainly not be cited in our references, their titles share an oddly serendipitous connection to our subject matter.

The fictional realm also offers a tangential association through works such as "The Cotton Club" and "Kerosene Cowboys," which, though unrelated to our study, charmingly evoke the imagery of agricultural settings and fuel usage. Additionally, it would be remiss not to mention the movies "Cotton Comes to Harlem" and "Apocalypse Now," as they tangentially touch upon themes related to our research, albeit in a purely coincidental and delightfully quirky manner.

As we embark on this scholarly escapade, let us not forget the underlying goal of this literature review—a quest for knowledge hidden amid the vast and often unexpected connections that elicit laughter, pondering, and perhaps even a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural research and energy consumption may seem worlds apart, like trying to mix oil and water -- or in this case, kerosene and cotton. However, as we delve into the heart of this paper, be prepared to witness a web of interconnectedness that would make even the most skilled spider blush with envy. We are about to unravel a curious conundrum that's as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack.
While the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation may not immediately conjure images of kerosene consumption in Vietnam, our investigation has unearthed a connection that stands out like a sore thumb – or a ripe cotton bale in a field. We recently found ourselves pondering whether there's more to this relationship than mere coincidence – could they have more in common than being just two peas in a pod?
Our research is not without its fair share of mind-bending surprises and unexpected turns, akin to a thrilling rollercoaster ride. As we analyze the data, we invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating journey that might just make your head spin faster than an unexpected plot twist in a novel.
So stick with us as we entertain the seemingly improbable notion that GMOs and kerosene are like the culinary duo of peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven. Get ready for a wild scholarly ride as we present our findings that promise to leave you both awestruck and a few chuckles richer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we harnessed the power of data analysis akin to intrepid explorers navigating the treacherous waters of statistical seas. With the precision of a surgeon's scalpel, we employed a multifaceted approach to uncover the enigmatic connection between GMO usage in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam. Our quest for this academic Holy Grail led us to traverse the vast digital expanse, braving the labyrinthine depths of the internet in search of hidden treasures of information.

First, we scoured the USDA's databases like eager archaeologists unearthing ancient artifacts, extracting valuable data on GMO usage in cotton across the expanse of North Carolina. This discovery set the stage for unraveling the mysteries that lay dormant in this agricultural powerhouse. With this foundational knowledge in hand, we then embarked on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's data repositories, meticulously extracting data on kerosene consumption in the captivating landscapes of Vietnam. Like detectives pursuing a convoluted case, we meticulously combed through the intricate details, ensuring nothing escaped our analytical gaze.

Upon procuring these valuable datasets, we employed a menagerie of statistical tools and techniques that would make even the most seasoned mathematician raise an eyebrow in admiration. From simple correlation analyses to the depths of multivariate regression models, we meticulously teased apart the intricate threads of these seemingly unrelated variables, aiming to knit together a comprehensive understanding of their interwoven tapestry.

Our time frame of analysis encompassed the years 2000 through 2021, a veritable odyssey through the annals of contemporary agricultural and energy utilization history. This breadth offered us a panoramic view of the evolving landscape, enabling us to capture the subtle nuances and shifts that might have eluded a narrower scope.

In addition, to ensure the robustness and reliability of our findings, we subjected our analyses to rigorous sensitivity tests and validation procedures, akin to stress-testing a piece of engineering marvel. This aptly served as a bulwark against the tempestuous sea of statistical uncertainties, providing a bedrock of confidence in the veracity of our results.

In summary, our methodology navigated the tumultuous waters of data acquisition and analysis with the skill and dexterity of a seasoned sailor, employing an array of tools and techniques with the precision of a concert pianist, all in pursuit of unraveling the extraordinary relationship between GMO usage in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9804862, r-squared of 0.9613532, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of agricultural research and energy consumption may seem worlds apart, like trying to mix oil and water -- or in this case, kerosene and cotton. However, as we delve into the heart of this paper, be prepared to witness a web of interconnectedness that would make even the most skilled spider blush with envy. We are about to unravel a curious conundrum that's as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack.
While the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation may not immediately conjure images of kerosene consumption in Vietnam, our investigation has unearthed a connection that stands out like a sore thumb – or a ripe cotton bale in a field. We recently found ourselves pondering whether there's more to this relationship than mere coincidence – could they have more in common than being just two peas in a pod?
Our research is not without its fair share of mind-bending surprises and unexpected turns, akin to a thrilling rollercoaster ride. As we analyze the data, we invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating journey that might just make your head spin faster than an unexpected plot twist in a novel.
So stick with us as we entertain the seemingly improbable notion that GMOs and kerosene are like the culinary duo of peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven. Get ready for a wild scholarly ride as we present our findings that promise to leave you both awestruck and a few chuckles richer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Analysis of the data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a strong correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam for the years 2000 to 2021. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.9804862, indicating a remarkably robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9613532 further confirms the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 96.1% of the variation in kerosene consumption in Vietnam can be explained by the variation in GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the presence of a significant association between these factors.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive correlation observed between GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam. The upward trend displayed in the plot further reinforces the compelling relationship discovered through our analysis.

These results underscore the unexpected and intriguing connection between GMO usage in one location and kerosene consumption in a seemingly unrelated location, challenging conventional beliefs and assumptions in the realms of agriculture and energy consumption. This correlation, while initially peculiar, provides valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate relationships that shape our world.

These findings not only contribute to the scholarly discourse but also inspire further examination and contemplation on the surprising interplay of diverse factors in our complex, interconnected world. As we unpack the implications of this discovery, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and remain open to the unparalleled and humorous mysteries that research may uncover.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have delved into the intricacies of genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in agriculture, with a particular focus on its application in cotton cultivation. Smith (2015) examines the impact of GMO technology on crop yields and economic outcomes in cotton production, highlighting its potential to revolutionize the agricultural landscape. Similarly, Doe (2018) explores the environmental implications of GMO adoption in cotton farming, shedding light on the complex interplay between biotechnology and sustainability.
However, as we transition from the serious realm of scholarly research to the realm of unexpected correlations, it is worth noting that our inquiry ventured into uncharted territory reminiscent of the novels "The Cotton Patch Gospel" by Clarence Jordan and "Kerosene" by Chris Wooding. While these books may not directly pertain to our topic and will certainly not be cited in our references, their titles share an oddly serendipitous connection to our subject matter.
The fictional realm also offers a tangential association through works such as "The Cotton Club" and "Kerosene Cowboys," which, though unrelated to our study, charmingly evoke the imagery of agricultural settings and fuel usage. Additionally, it would be remiss not to mention the movies "Cotton Comes to Harlem" and "Apocalypse Now," as they tangentially touch upon themes related to our research, albeit in a purely coincidental and delightfully quirky manner.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, let us not forget the underlying goal of this literature review—a quest for knowledge hidden amid the vast and often unexpected connections that elicit laughter, pondering, and perhaps even a touch of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
Analysis of the data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a strong correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam for the years 2000 to 2021. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.9804862, indicating a remarkably robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9613532 further confirms the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 96.1% of the variation in kerosene consumption in Vietnam can be explained by the variation in GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the presence of a significant association between these factors.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive correlation observed between GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam. The upward trend displayed in the plot further reinforces the compelling relationship discovered through our analysis.
These results underscore the unexpected and intriguing connection between GMO usage in one location and kerosene consumption in a seemingly unrelated location, challenging conventional beliefs and assumptions in the realms of agriculture and energy consumption. This correlation, while initially peculiar, provides valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate relationships that shape our world.
These findings not only contribute to the scholarly discourse but also inspire further examination and contemplation on the surprising interplay of diverse factors in our complex, interconnected world. As we unpack the implications of this discovery, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and remain open to the unparalleled and humorous mysteries that research may uncover.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The intriguing correlation between GMO usage in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam unravels a web of interconnectedness that defies conventional wisdom. Our study, building on the literature review, brings forth a rare gem—a connection that resonates with the unexpected, uncharted, and whimsical aspects of scholarly inquiry. As we sift through the data, it becomes evident that this association, while bordering on the surreal, reinforces the peculiar and often playful nature of research endeavors. The unexpected link between seemingly disparate factors—akin to the whimsy found in fictional works—deserves acknowledgment and contemplation.

Our findings dovetail with previous research on GMO usage in agriculture, echoing the spirit of pioneering works by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018). Delightfully, just as the novels "The Cotton Patch Gospel" and "Kerosene" tantalize with offbeat titles, our research ropes in a connection that veers from the norm, beckoning us to explore the uncharted territory of unexpected correlations.

Furthermore, the scatterplot depicts not just a correlation, but an almost choreographed dance of data points, waltzing in sync to the tunes of GMO usage in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam. This captivating synchrony, reminiscent of the harmonies found in "The Cotton Club," and the adventurous spirit of "Apocalypse Now," challenges the notions of predictability and stability in research outcomes. It embodies the delightful unpredictability that adds a touch of whimsy to scholarly pursuits.

As we unravel the implications of this research, we urge our peers to embrace the unexpected, to revel in the joy of uncovering unconventional relationships, and to savor the irrepressible curiosity that propels scholarly inquiry. Our study, replete with its unanticipated twists and turns, serves as a beacon of playful discovery, shattering preconceived boundaries and opening the door to the unabashedly quirky, humorous, and perplexing mysteries of our interconnected world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of agricultural research and energy consumption may seem worlds apart, like trying to mix oil and water -- or in this case, kerosene and cotton. However, as we delve into the heart of this paper, be prepared to witness a web of interconnectedness that would make even the most skilled spider blush with envy. We are about to unravel a curious conundrum that's as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack.
While the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation may not immediately conjure images of kerosene consumption in Vietnam, our investigation has unearthed a connection that stands out like a sore thumb – or a ripe cotton bale in a field. We recently found ourselves pondering whether there's more to this relationship than mere coincidence – could they have more in common than being just two peas in a pod?
Our research is not without its fair share of mind-bending surprises and unexpected turns, akin to a thrilling rollercoaster ride. As we analyze the data, we invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating journey that might just make your head spin faster than an unexpected plot twist in a novel.
So stick with us as we entertain the seemingly improbable notion that GMOs and kerosene are like the culinary duo of peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven. Get ready for a wild scholarly ride as we present our findings that promise to leave you both awestruck and a few chuckles richer.

[[RESULTS]]
Analysis of the data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a strong correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam for the years 2000 to 2021. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.9804862, indicating a remarkably robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9613532 further confirms the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 96.1% of the variation in kerosene consumption in Vietnam can be explained by the variation in GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the presence of a significant association between these factors.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive correlation observed between GMO usage in cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam. The upward trend displayed in the plot further reinforces the compelling relationship discovered through our analysis.
These results underscore the unexpected and intriguing connection between GMO usage in one location and kerosene consumption in a seemingly unrelated location, challenging conventional beliefs and assumptions in the realms of agriculture and energy consumption. This correlation, while initially peculiar, provides valuable insights into the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate relationships that shape our world.
These findings not only contribute to the scholarly discourse but also inspire further examination and contemplation on the surprising interplay of diverse factors in our complex, interconnected world. As we unpack the implications of this discovery, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and remain open to the unparalleled and humorous mysteries that research may uncover.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has brought to light a correlation so strong, it's almost like finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. The striking relationship between GMO usage in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Vietnam has left us in awe, much like stumbling upon a rare gem in a peculiar place.

These findings challenge conventional thinking and invite us to ponder the unexpected interconnections that shape our world—like discovering that peanut butter and jelly have an inexplicable bond beyond the sandwich. As we close the final chapter on this enigmatic connection, we find ourselves compelled to acknowledge that some mysteries are best left unexplained, like a quirk of fate or a particularly stubborn knot. With that said, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as sometimes, the beauty lies in the eccentricity itself, and seeking to unravel this complex web any further would be as futile as trying to count all the seeds in a cotton boll.

Let this study stand as a testament to the whimsical nature of research and the delightful surprises it has in store. In the wise words of William Shakespeare, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophies." And indeed, our cotton and kerosene connection is a testament to the marvelous and inexplicable intricacies of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Transdisciplinary Agricultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Global Sustainability (IAIGS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cotton Connection: Unraveling the Link Between GMO Usage in North Carolina and Kerosene Consumption in Vietnam with an abstract of This paper delves into the curious relationship between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina, USA, and the consumption of kerosene in Vietnam. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period 2000 to 2021, we uncover a striking correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9804862 and p < 0.01. While it may seem like an improbable link, our findings reveal a significant association that warrants further scrutiny. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of global agricultural practices and energy utilization, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It aims to provoke thought and inquiry, offering a fresh and irreverently amusing perspective on the intricate web of interconnected elements in our world.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, North Carolina, kerosene consumption, Vietnam, agricultural practices, energy utilization, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, global agricultural practices, GMO usage, cotton cultivation, GMOs, interconnectedness, global energy consumption

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in North Carolina that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in North Carolina

Kerosene used in Vietnam
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Vietnam in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Vietnam

Correlation r = 0.9804862 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9613532 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Vietnam) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in North Carolina) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-15. 0.0000000000000013332326573837
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.3E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 750,056,634,497,968 random variables You don't actually need 750 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in North Carolina (GMO cotton %)29372729272419161413778557143647
Kerosene used in Vietnam (Million Barrels/Day)7.6877610.80088.386527.348797.561046.416964.426224.659182.492192.181341.863671.651891.478420.8471230.55063111.064580.9559450.6952330.9124930.912493




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([29,37,27,29,27,24,19,16,14,13,7,7,8,5,5,7,1,4,3,6,4,7,])
array_2 = np.array([7.68776,10.8008,8.38652,7.34879,7.56104,6.41696,4.42622,4.65918,2.49219,2.18134,1.86367,1.65189,1.47842,0.847123,0.55063,1,1,1.06458,0.955945,0.695233,0.912493,0.912493,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Vietnam"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2844 · Black Variable ID: 786 · Red Variable ID: 25076
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0