about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,838 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn in Nebraska has developed a kernel of sass, leading to unprecedented levels of corn-based puns and sassiness on social media. People just can't ear it anymore!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a glitch art depiction of a Nebraska cornfield. Within the field, rows of tall cornstalks are bathed in sunlight. Among the rows, a sign proudly announces "GMO Cornfield." A group of people stands in the field, laughing while attempting to shuck the ears of corn. In the background, someone is seen typing furiously on their phone, trying to find respite from the pun overload. The glitch art style should create an abstract and visually striking representation of this scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Cyberpunk Low poly Voxel art Glitch art
ChatGPT: Glitch art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: The increase in GMO use in Nebraska corn has led to a surge in corny jokes, causing people to "i cant even" and turn to Google for relief. The corny humor overload has left everyone unable to even kernel with the pun-ishment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Nebraska, rows of tall cornstalks stretch out under the sun. Among the rows, a sign proudly announces "GMO Cornfield." A group of people stands in the field, chuckling at corny jokes while attempting to shuck the ears of corn. Meanwhile, in the background, someone is seen typing furiously on their phone, searching for "i cant even" on Google, trying to find respite from the pun overload.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Glitch art ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Nebraska, rows of tall cornstalks stretch out under the sun. Among the rows, a sign proudly announces "GMO Cornfield." A group of people stands in the field, chuckling at corny jokes while attempting to shuck the ears of corn. Meanwhile, in the background, someone is seen typing furiously on their phone, searching for "i cant even" on Google, trying to find respite from the pun overload. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a glitch art depiction of a Nebraska cornfield. Within the field, rows of tall cornstalks are bathed in sunlight. Among the rows, a sign proudly announces "GMO Cornfield." A group of people stands in the field, laughing while attempting to shuck the ears of corn. In the background, someone is seen typing furiously on their phone, trying to find respite from the pun overload. The glitch art style should create an abstract and visually striking representation of this scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

Journal of Agrifood Technology and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

In the world of scientific exploration, there are the rock-solid, well-established relationships between variables, and then there are the quirky, seemingly bizarre connections that make you scratch your head and go, "I can't even believe this!" Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn in Nebraska and the inundation of "I Can't Even" Google searches falls squarely into the bewildering category. But fear not, fellow researchers, for amidst the perplexity lies a tale of statistical peculiarities, agricultural enigmas, and internet shenanigans that will surely leave you chuckling and pondering the whims of our modern interconnected world.

GMOs have long been a subject of contention, stirring up debates hotter than a petri dish under a Bunsen burner. Meanwhile, the internet has birthed myriad catchphrases and memes, with "I Can't Even" taking a prominent place on the virtual pedestal of exasperated expression. What happens when we mix these seemingly disparate elements together in the cauldron of analysis? Well, to put it in a scientific but jovial manner, things got delightfully wacky.

But let's not allow laughter to overshadow the gravitas of our endeavor. Serious questions beckon us, dear reader. What do we make of the conspicuous connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in the cornhusker state and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine? Is this a matter of mere statistical noise akin to the static on an outdated radio, or is there truly something brewing beneath the surface of these statistical curiosities? Our study aims to unravel these perplexing threads and, in the process, embellish the stodgy landscape of agricultural and internet research with a touch of whimsy.

So, buckle up and don your thinking caps – we're about to embark on a journey through the cornfields of Nebraska and the labyrinth of search algorithms, all in the pursuit of understanding the dynamic interplay between GMOs and exasperation. Are you ready to delve into the amalgamation of maize and mayhem? Well, strap in, fellow explorer, for this riveting ride is about to begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the world of scientific exploration, there are the rock-solid, well-established relationships between variables, and then there are the quirky, seemingly bizarre connections that make you scratch your head and go, "I can't even believe this!" Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn in Nebraska and the inundation of "I Can't Even" Google searches falls squarely into the bewildering category. But fear not, fellow researchers, for amidst the perplexity lies a tale of statistical peculiarities, agricultural enigmas, and internet shenanigans that will surely leave you chuckling and pondering the whims of our modern interconnected world.
GMOs have long been a subject of contention, stirring up debates hotter than a petri dish under a Bunsen burner. Meanwhile, the internet has birthed myriad catchphrases and memes, with "I Can't Even" taking a prominent place on the virtual pedestal of exasperated expression. What happens when we mix these seemingly disparate elements together in the cauldron of analysis? Well, to put it in a scientific but jovial manner, things got delightfully wacky.
But let's not allow laughter to overshadow the gravitas of our endeavor. Serious questions beckon us, dear reader. What do we make of the conspicuous connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in the cornhusker state and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine? Is this a matter of mere statistical noise akin to the static on an outdated radio, or is there truly something brewing beneath the surface of these statistical curiosities? Our study aims to unravel these perplexing threads and, in the process, embellish the stodgy landscape of agricultural and internet research with a touch of whimsy.
So, buckle up and don your thinking caps – we're about to embark on a journey through the cornfields of Nebraska and the labyrinth of search algorithms, all in the pursuit of understanding the dynamic interplay between GMOs and exasperation. Are you ready to delve into the amalgamation of maize and mayhem? Well, strap in, fellow explorer, for this riveting ride is about to begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing body of literature offers a curious mix of insights into the peculiar correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Nebraska and the surge of "I Can't Even" Google searches. Smith and Doe (2017) delve into the agronomic implications of GMO corn cultivation, emphasizing its potential for increasing crop yields and pest resistance. While their research focuses on agricultural productivity, the subtle undertones of exasperation among corn stalks remain unexplored.

Jones (2019) further contributes to this discourse by examining the societal impact of GMOs, highlighting the complex interplay between consumer perceptions and agricultural practices. However, amidst the discussions on consumer attitudes, one cannot help but wonder if hidden within the maize maze lies a trail of enigmatic frustration waiting to be unearthed.

Turning to more unconventional sources, "GMOs and You: A Corny Tale" by Farmer Frank (2018) offers an informal yet informative take on the adoption of GMO corn in agriculture. As readers navigate through the cornfields of Nebraska, they may find themselves chuckling at the cryptic whispers of "I Can't Even" mingling with the rustling of the GMO corn leaves. The unexpected marriage of agricultural science and internet colloquialism takes center stage, much like an unlikely duo stealing the spotlight in a vaudevillian performance.

Intriguingly, fictional works such as "The Lost Harvest" by A. G. Riculturist (2005) and "Maize Mayhem" by E. S. Paragus (2013) offer imaginative portrayals of GMO corn's influence, albeit without explicit references to Google searches for frustration. Yet, within the fabric of fiction, one cannot dismiss the possibility of subconscious connections between GMO intricacies and exasperation finding their way into the realms of literature.

Notably, the authors stumbled upon a social media post by a disgruntled netizen, who in a moment of digital despair proclaimed, "GMO corn got me like 'I Can't Even'". While not a traditional scholarly source, the raw authenticity of this online exclamation reverberates with a profound sense of exasperation that resonates with our own findings.

As we wade through this eclectic amalgamation of literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO corn in Nebraska and the exclamation of "I Can't Even" is a tapestry woven with interwoven threads of amusement and perplexity. Despite the scholarly depth and botanical breadth of the literature, the unassuming correlation between agriculture and exasperation continues to evade a comprehensive explication.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the world of scientific exploration, there are the rock-solid, well-established relationships between variables, and then there are the quirky, seemingly bizarre connections that make you scratch your head and go, "I can't even believe this!" Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn in Nebraska and the inundation of "I Can't Even" Google searches falls squarely into the bewildering category. But fear not, fellow researchers, for amidst the perplexity lies a tale of statistical peculiarities, agricultural enigmas, and internet shenanigans that will surely leave you chuckling and pondering the whims of our modern interconnected world.
GMOs have long been a subject of contention, stirring up debates hotter than a petri dish under a Bunsen burner. Meanwhile, the internet has birthed myriad catchphrases and memes, with "I Can't Even" taking a prominent place on the virtual pedestal of exasperated expression. What happens when we mix these seemingly disparate elements together in the cauldron of analysis? Well, to put it in a scientific but jovial manner, things got delightfully wacky.
But let's not allow laughter to overshadow the gravitas of our endeavor. Serious questions beckon us, dear reader. What do we make of the conspicuous connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in the cornhusker state and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine? Is this a matter of mere statistical noise akin to the static on an outdated radio, or is there truly something brewing beneath the surface of these statistical curiosities? Our study aims to unravel these perplexing threads and, in the process, embellish the stodgy landscape of agricultural and internet research with a touch of whimsy.
So, buckle up and don your thinking caps – we're about to embark on a journey through the cornfields of Nebraska and the labyrinth of search algorithms, all in the pursuit of understanding the dynamic interplay between GMOs and exasperation. Are you ready to delve into the amalgamation of maize and mayhem? Well, strap in, fellow explorer, for this riveting ride is about to begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Study Design:
We embarked on this whimsical research expedition aiming to unravel the mysterious interplay between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Nebraska and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine. Our methodological approach combined a mix of quantitative analysis, digital ethnography, and a healthy dose of curiosity. Buckle up for a journey through the unexplored territories of agricultural statistics and internet phenomena—a ride that makes the stomach-flipping sensation of a roller coaster seem like a mere statistical blip!

Data Collection:
Our intrepid data collection involved mining information from the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) to track the widespread adoption of GMO corn in Nebraska. These data resemble hunting through a jungle of bureaucratic records, where deciphering agricultural codes and acronyms becomes as thrilling as cracking a secret cipher. We then turned our gaze to the digital realm, harnessing the power of Google Trends to capture the ebbs and flows of "I Can't Even" searches. Picture this phase as navigating the choppy waters of the internet, with each wave of search data resembling a turbulent journey filled with surprises and unexpected twists.

Variables and Analysis:
With our trusty statistical software in hand, we meticulously crunched the numbers to uncover the hidden connections between GMO corn and the exasperated musings encapsulated by "I Can't Even". The correlation coefficient emerged as our loyal ally, revealing a surprisingly high value of 0.9138689. If statistics were a comedy show, this correlation coefficient would be the uproarious punchline that leaves the audience in stitches. But wait, there's more! The p-value, our gatekeeper to statistical significance, strutted onto the stage with a swaggering declaration of less than 0.01, signaling that our findings were not mere statistical flukes but bona fide phenomena.

Ethical Considerations:
As we ventured into uncharted territory, ethical concerns beckoned us to chart a course of transparency and academic integrity. We handled the data with the care of a scientist nurturing delicate specimens in a lab, ensuring that our interpretations were grounded in the solid bedrock of empirical evidence rather than flights of whimsy.

Limitations:
No quest for discovery is without its challenges, and ours was no exception. While we unraveled the enchanting link between GMO corn and exasperation, we acknowledge the limitations of our study. The fluctuating landscapes of internet search trends and agricultural practices posed hurdles akin to navigating a scientific obstacle course. Despite our best efforts, we couldn't eradicate all confounding variables, leaving room for future adventurers to delve deeper into the fertile soil of this amusing but decidedly enigmatic correlation.

In summary, our methodology blended the rigors of statistical analysis, the intrigue of digital exploration, and a healthy dose of scientific humor to illuminate the perplexing connection between GMO corn and "I Can't Even" searches. This research venture was a roller coaster of data collection and analysis, a journey that may have left us dizzy but certainly more enlightened about the unlikely tango between agricultural innovation and internet exasperation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9138689, r-squared of 0.8351563, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
In the world of scientific exploration, there are the rock-solid, well-established relationships between variables, and then there are the quirky, seemingly bizarre connections that make you scratch your head and go, "I can't even believe this!" Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn in Nebraska and the inundation of "I Can't Even" Google searches falls squarely into the bewildering category. But fear not, fellow researchers, for amidst the perplexity lies a tale of statistical peculiarities, agricultural enigmas, and internet shenanigans that will surely leave you chuckling and pondering the whims of our modern interconnected world.
GMOs have long been a subject of contention, stirring up debates hotter than a petri dish under a Bunsen burner. Meanwhile, the internet has birthed myriad catchphrases and memes, with "I Can't Even" taking a prominent place on the virtual pedestal of exasperated expression. What happens when we mix these seemingly disparate elements together in the cauldron of analysis? Well, to put it in a scientific but jovial manner, things got delightfully wacky.
But let's not allow laughter to overshadow the gravitas of our endeavor. Serious questions beckon us, dear reader. What do we make of the conspicuous connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in the cornhusker state and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine? Is this a matter of mere statistical noise akin to the static on an outdated radio, or is there truly something brewing beneath the surface of these statistical curiosities? Our study aims to unravel these perplexing threads and, in the process, embellish the stodgy landscape of agricultural and internet research with a touch of whimsy.
So, buckle up and don your thinking caps – we're about to embark on a journey through the cornfields of Nebraska and the labyrinth of search algorithms, all in the pursuit of understanding the dynamic interplay between GMOs and exasperation. Are you ready to delve into the amalgamation of maize and mayhem? Well, strap in, fellow explorer, for this riveting ride is about to begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches produced some truly unexpected and, dare I say, corny findings. We found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689, which practically screams, "Hey there, I'm statistically significant!" The r-squared value of 0.8351563 further emphasized the robustness of the relationship, suggesting that the adoption of GMO corn could indeed be linked to the exasperation expressed by individuals through online searches.

Now, I know what you're thinking – "How on earth could genetically modified corn be related to people's frustration expressed through a meme-worthy search term?" It's a question that boggled our minds, too. But let's put on our researcher hats and dissect these results with the precision of a lab technician – or at least with a good dose of scientific curiosity and a dash of whimsy.

The p-value of less than 0.01 was like a neon sign screaming, "This is no statistical fluke – pay attention, folks!" It's the kind of p-value that makes you want to high-five your research team and say, "We've struck statistical gold, my friends!"

To really drive home the point, we created a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which vividly depicts the downright uncanny relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" searches. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot is a visual manuscript of agricultural and internet absurdity.

In conclusion, our findings not only demonstrate a strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches but also highlight the delightful quirkiness and unexpected connections that permeate our world. This research opens the door for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on human emotions and internet expressions. So, let's raise a toast to the fascinating, albeit unusual, correlations that keep us scratching our heads and saying, "I can't even believe it!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing body of literature offers a curious mix of insights into the peculiar correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Nebraska and the surge of "I Can't Even" Google searches. Smith and Doe (2017) delve into the agronomic implications of GMO corn cultivation, emphasizing its potential for increasing crop yields and pest resistance. While their research focuses on agricultural productivity, the subtle undertones of exasperation among corn stalks remain unexplored.
Jones (2019) further contributes to this discourse by examining the societal impact of GMOs, highlighting the complex interplay between consumer perceptions and agricultural practices. However, amidst the discussions on consumer attitudes, one cannot help but wonder if hidden within the maize maze lies a trail of enigmatic frustration waiting to be unearthed.
Turning to more unconventional sources, "GMOs and You: A Corny Tale" by Farmer Frank (2018) offers an informal yet informative take on the adoption of GMO corn in agriculture. As readers navigate through the cornfields of Nebraska, they may find themselves chuckling at the cryptic whispers of "I Can't Even" mingling with the rustling of the GMO corn leaves. The unexpected marriage of agricultural science and internet colloquialism takes center stage, much like an unlikely duo stealing the spotlight in a vaudevillian performance.
Intriguingly, fictional works such as "The Lost Harvest" by A. G. Riculturist (2005) and "Maize Mayhem" by E. S. Paragus (2013) offer imaginative portrayals of GMO corn's influence, albeit without explicit references to Google searches for frustration. Yet, within the fabric of fiction, one cannot dismiss the possibility of subconscious connections between GMO intricacies and exasperation finding their way into the realms of literature.
Notably, the authors stumbled upon a social media post by a disgruntled netizen, who in a moment of digital despair proclaimed, "GMO corn got me like 'I Can't Even'". While not a traditional scholarly source, the raw authenticity of this online exclamation reverberates with a profound sense of exasperation that resonates with our own findings.
As we wade through this eclectic amalgamation of literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO corn in Nebraska and the exclamation of "I Can't Even" is a tapestry woven with interwoven threads of amusement and perplexity. Despite the scholarly depth and botanical breadth of the literature, the unassuming correlation between agriculture and exasperation continues to evade a comprehensive explication.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches produced some truly unexpected and, dare I say, corny findings. We found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689, which practically screams, "Hey there, I'm statistically significant!" The r-squared value of 0.8351563 further emphasized the robustness of the relationship, suggesting that the adoption of GMO corn could indeed be linked to the exasperation expressed by individuals through online searches.
Now, I know what you're thinking – "How on earth could genetically modified corn be related to people's frustration expressed through a meme-worthy search term?" It's a question that boggled our minds, too. But let's put on our researcher hats and dissect these results with the precision of a lab technician – or at least with a good dose of scientific curiosity and a dash of whimsy.
The p-value of less than 0.01 was like a neon sign screaming, "This is no statistical fluke – pay attention, folks!" It's the kind of p-value that makes you want to high-five your research team and say, "We've struck statistical gold, my friends!"
To really drive home the point, we created a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which vividly depicts the downright uncanny relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" searches. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot is a visual manuscript of agricultural and internet absurdity.
In conclusion, our findings not only demonstrate a strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches but also highlight the delightful quirkiness and unexpected connections that permeate our world. This research opens the door for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on human emotions and internet expressions. So, let's raise a toast to the fascinating, albeit unusual, correlations that keep us scratching our heads and saying, "I can't even believe it!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has peeled back the husk of conventional wisdom and revealed a kernel of truth in the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the surge of "I Can't Even" Google searches. Now, let's not beat around the bush – this correlation is almost as surprising as finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a strand of frustrated internet users lost in a sea of genetically modified corn.

Our results have not only supported but also heightened the wonderment surrounding this phenomenon, as documented in the literature review. Smith and Doe (2017) may have been focused on crop yields and pest resistance, but let's not overlook the potential for the emotional livelihood of corn to sway human emotions. It's as if these resilient GMO cornstalks have been whispering hints of exasperation in the wind, and the internet has been echoing their sentiment – a story straight out of a scientific fairytale.

Jones (2019) highlighted the interplay between consumer perceptions and agricultural practices, and we must dare to wonder if our findings have unearthed the subliminal frustration encoded in every bite of corn bread. Farmer Frank's (2018) "GMOs and You: A Corny Tale" may have seemed like light reading, but maybe, just maybe, the humor he injected into the tale of GMO corn was a subtle nod to the frustration lurking beneath the surface. In their own whimsical ways, A. G. Riculturist (2005) and E. S. Paragus (2013) painted vivid pictures of a world where GMO corn may hold the key to a collective exasperation, wrapped in literary wit and wisdom.

Our findings not only call for further investigation but also compel researchers to approach the relationship between agriculture and human expressions with a healthy dose of imagination and humor. It's like exploring a scientific mystery novel laden with humor, curiosity, and statistical significance. As researchers, we are not just following the data; we are also chasing the playful dance of multiple variables, leading us to unexpected connections and mind-boggling findings.

In essence, our study has magnified the delightful absurdity that underscores the complex and often hilarious web of correlations in our world. So, let's embrace the whimsy, and with our metaphorical magnifying glass in hand, continue to unveil the wonders hidden within the most unsuspecting places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
In the world of scientific exploration, there are the rock-solid, well-established relationships between variables, and then there are the quirky, seemingly bizarre connections that make you scratch your head and go, "I can't even believe this!" Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn in Nebraska and the inundation of "I Can't Even" Google searches falls squarely into the bewildering category. But fear not, fellow researchers, for amidst the perplexity lies a tale of statistical peculiarities, agricultural enigmas, and internet shenanigans that will surely leave you chuckling and pondering the whims of our modern interconnected world.
GMOs have long been a subject of contention, stirring up debates hotter than a petri dish under a Bunsen burner. Meanwhile, the internet has birthed myriad catchphrases and memes, with "I Can't Even" taking a prominent place on the virtual pedestal of exasperated expression. What happens when we mix these seemingly disparate elements together in the cauldron of analysis? Well, to put it in a scientific but jovial manner, things got delightfully wacky.
But let's not allow laughter to overshadow the gravitas of our endeavor. Serious questions beckon us, dear reader. What do we make of the conspicuous connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in the cornhusker state and the surge of "I Can't Even" queries on the Google search engine? Is this a matter of mere statistical noise akin to the static on an outdated radio, or is there truly something brewing beneath the surface of these statistical curiosities? Our study aims to unravel these perplexing threads and, in the process, embellish the stodgy landscape of agricultural and internet research with a touch of whimsy.
So, buckle up and don your thinking caps – we're about to embark on a journey through the cornfields of Nebraska and the labyrinth of search algorithms, all in the pursuit of understanding the dynamic interplay between GMOs and exasperation. Are you ready to delve into the amalgamation of maize and mayhem? Well, strap in, fellow explorer, for this riveting ride is about to begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches produced some truly unexpected and, dare I say, corny findings. We found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689, which practically screams, "Hey there, I'm statistically significant!" The r-squared value of 0.8351563 further emphasized the robustness of the relationship, suggesting that the adoption of GMO corn could indeed be linked to the exasperation expressed by individuals through online searches.
Now, I know what you're thinking – "How on earth could genetically modified corn be related to people's frustration expressed through a meme-worthy search term?" It's a question that boggled our minds, too. But let's put on our researcher hats and dissect these results with the precision of a lab technician – or at least with a good dose of scientific curiosity and a dash of whimsy.
The p-value of less than 0.01 was like a neon sign screaming, "This is no statistical fluke – pay attention, folks!" It's the kind of p-value that makes you want to high-five your research team and say, "We've struck statistical gold, my friends!"
To really drive home the point, we created a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which vividly depicts the downright uncanny relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I Can't Even" searches. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot is a visual manuscript of agricultural and internet absurdity.
In conclusion, our findings not only demonstrate a strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the frequency of "I Can't Even" Google searches but also highlight the delightful quirkiness and unexpected connections that permeate our world. This research opens the door for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on human emotions and internet expressions. So, let's raise a toast to the fascinating, albeit unusual, correlations that keep us scratching our heads and saying, "I can't even believe it!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the wonderful world of research, we have unearthed a correlation that makes GMO corn and "I Can't Even" searches go together like peas and carrots, or should I say, corn and queries! Our statistical foray into the labyrinth of agricultural whimsy and internet absurdity has uncovered a relationship that is as confounding as a quantum physics joke – but my dear colleagues, it is one that cannot be ignored.

The magnitude of the correlation coefficient and p-value is as striking as a lab coat in a field of sunflowers, and it has left us with more than a kernel of curiosity about the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation. Not only do these findings inspire giggles and head-scratching, but they beckon us to ponder the multifaceted connections that underpin our modern existence. It's like stumbling upon a punnet square of science and hilarity – unexpected, yet utterly delightful.

And so, dear friends, in the spirit of scientific revelry, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Our investigation has sown the seeds of understanding and reaped a harvest of merriment, leaving us with a feeling of scientific accomplishment and a touch of bemusement. Let's raise a toast to the delightful peculiarities that keep our research endeavors both rigorous and riotous, reminding us that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, a good chuckle is never out of place. As we bid adieu to our GMO-curious, internet-inquisitive escapade, let us not forget that in the vast fields of research, sometimes the quirkiest connections yield the ripest insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agrifood Technology and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Intergalactic Agricultural Advancements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Guzzling Corn: The Google Gambit on 'I Can't Even' with an abstract of In this innovative study, we explore the seemingly unrelated worlds of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Nebraska and the internet phenomenon of "I Can't Even" Google searches. The use of data from the USDA and Google Trends allowed us to delve into this quirky correlation, revealing a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9138689 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between the increasing prevalence of GMO corn in Nebraska and the frustration or bewilderment expressed by individuals through the "I Can't Even" search term. This study not only provides a humorous lens through which to interpret agricultural and internet trends but also calls for further investigation into the impact of GMO crops on our collective exasperation.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Nebraska agriculture, GMO cultivation, genetically modified organism, Google search trends, "I Can't Even" searches, USDA data, correlation coefficient, p-value, internet phenomenon, frustration, bewilderment, GMO crop impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Nebraska genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9138689 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8351563 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.81E-8. 0.0000000180653797120108180000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.81E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 55,354,497 random variables You don't actually need 55 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska (GMO corn %)612152535424552557477827781848582918587
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,12,15,25,35,42,45,52,55,74,77,82,77,81,84,85,82,91,85,87,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2838 · Black Variable ID: 746 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0