Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Fossil fuel use in Equatorial Guinea | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.99 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Geothermal power generated in New Zealand | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Cabo Verde | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.98 | 24yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Economic output of Washington metro area | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.91 | 20yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)