about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,774 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Reno, Nevada and the second variable is Instructor salaries in the US.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Reno worsened, it led to an influx of air filtration sales. This increased demand for filters caused a shortage of materials, leading to higher prices for manufacturing essentials. As a result, the cost of producing educational resources rose, forcing educational institutions to cut down on their budgets, including instructor salaries. Who knew the air in Reno could have such far-reaching effects on the nation's educators!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image featuring a TIME magazine cover with the iconic red border and showcasing Reno, Nevada's serene mountainous landscape under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, depict bustling city life with people walking amidst skyscrapers. A subtle graph illustrating the rise in instructors' salaries could be incorporated into the design. The image should capture the celebratory atmosphere of success and progress in a bustling urban setting against the backdrop of Reno's majestic natural beauty. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Whimsical illustration Macabre Symbolism Brutalism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US, in the following situation: Because higher air quality in Reno leads to increased happiness, which boosts productivity. Higher productivity leads to better education, increasing demand for instructors and thus their salaries nationwide.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, clear skies stretch over the mountains of Reno, Nevada as people take deep breaths of fresh air. Supportive and motivated instructors in classrooms across the US are seen guiding eager students, their dedication reflected in the rising graph of their salaries.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, clear skies stretch over the mountains of Reno, Nevada as people take deep breaths of fresh air. Supportive and motivated instructors in classrooms across the US are seen guiding eager students, their dedication reflected in the rising graph of their salaries. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image featuring a TIME magazine cover with the iconic red border and showcasing Reno, Nevada's serene mountainous landscape under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, depict bustling city life with people walking amidst skyscrapers. A subtle graph illustrating the rise in instructors' salaries could be incorporated into the design. The image should capture the celebratory atmosphere of success and progress in a bustling urban setting against the backdrop of Reno's majestic natural beauty.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air quality in Reno, Nevada caused Instructor salaries in the US to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection between environmental factors and economic indicators has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. The present investigation delves into the rather unexpected and whimsical relationship between air quality in the charming city of Reno, Nevada and the salaries of instructors throughout the United States. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities may at first glance appear as nebulous as the smog itself, our analysis aims to shed light on the surprising connection that has emerged from our data.

Air quality, an often overlooked aspect of urban living, has been the subject of numerous studies highlighting its impact on public health and well-being. Reno, known for its captivating landscapes and vibrant casino scene, experiences unique atmospheric conditions influenced by its geographic location and human activities. Meanwhile, the salaries of instructors, the unsung heroes of the education sector, have been a topic of perennial debate and discussion. The confluence of these two subjects might prompt one to ponder the possibility of a serendipitous relationship or merely evoke skepticism regarding the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations.

As we embark on this intellectual voyage, we are reminded of the words of Lewis Carroll: "Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." With such sage advice in mind, we pivot to a discussion of the literature that has laid the foundation for our investigation, providing a framework for our understanding of this rather unconventional connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection between environmental factors and economic indicators has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. The present investigation delves into the rather unexpected and whimsical relationship between air quality in the charming city of Reno, Nevada and the salaries of instructors throughout the United States. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities may at first glance appear as nebulous as the smog itself, our analysis aims to shed light on the surprising connection that has emerged from our data.
Air quality, an often overlooked aspect of urban living, has been the subject of numerous studies highlighting its impact on public health and well-being. Reno, known for its captivating landscapes and vibrant casino scene, experiences unique atmospheric conditions influenced by its geographic location and human activities. Meanwhile, the salaries of instructors, the unsung heroes of the education sector, have been a topic of perennial debate and discussion. The confluence of these two subjects might prompt one to ponder the possibility of a serendipitous relationship or merely evoke skepticism regarding the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations.
As we embark on this intellectual voyage, we are reminded of the words of Lewis Carroll: "Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." With such sage advice in mind, we pivot to a discussion of the literature that has laid the foundation for our investigation, providing a framework for our understanding of this rather unconventional connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020) observe a strong positive correlation between air quality and economic indicators in their study "The Impact of Air Quality on Economic Outcomes." The authors find that areas with poor air quality tend to experience lower economic growth and diminished quality of life, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of environmental pollution. However, our investigation seeks to diverge from this conventional line of inquiry by examining the unforeseen connection between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States.
Building upon this foundation, Book (2019) delves into the complexities of urban air pollution in "The Unseen Fog: A Socioeconomic Analysis of Air Quality," uncovering the intricate interplay between environmental factors and societal well-being. These insights set the stage for our scrutiny of the correlation between air quality and instructor salaries, challenging us to consider the potential influence of atmospheric conditions on economic parameters.
In a departure from the typical discourse on instructor salaries, Ipsum and Lorem (2018) explore the multifaceted determinants of educational remuneration in "Beyond the Classroom: Unraveling the Enigma of Instructor Compensation." While their focus is primarily on traditional determinants such as educational attainment and experience, our inquiry extends to encompass the unconventional influence of air quality on the salaries of educators.

Turning to non-academic works, the fictional portrayal of environmental challenges in "The Air We Breathe: A Tale of Urban Turbulence" by Fictional Author (2020) invites readers into a world where the atmosphere takes center stage in shaping human destinies, offering an alternative perspective on the impact of air quality on socioeconomic dynamics. Similarly, the dystopian narrative of "Smoke and Mirrors: The Skies Above Reno" by Imaginative Writer (2017) presents a surreal landscape where the whims of air quality intertwine with the fortunes of inhabitants, echoing the unexpected parallels we aim to elucidate in our investigation.

Notably, the internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" has garnered widespread attention for its emblematic representation of choosing one option over another, mirroring the decision-making process faced by policymakers in balancing environmental considerations with educational expenditure. This serves as a lighthearted yet pertinent reminder of the choices at hand when addressing the potential implications of air quality on instructor salaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection between environmental factors and economic indicators has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. The present investigation delves into the rather unexpected and whimsical relationship between air quality in the charming city of Reno, Nevada and the salaries of instructors throughout the United States. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities may at first glance appear as nebulous as the smog itself, our analysis aims to shed light on the surprising connection that has emerged from our data.
Air quality, an often overlooked aspect of urban living, has been the subject of numerous studies highlighting its impact on public health and well-being. Reno, known for its captivating landscapes and vibrant casino scene, experiences unique atmospheric conditions influenced by its geographic location and human activities. Meanwhile, the salaries of instructors, the unsung heroes of the education sector, have been a topic of perennial debate and discussion. The confluence of these two subjects might prompt one to ponder the possibility of a serendipitous relationship or merely evoke skepticism regarding the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations.
As we embark on this intellectual voyage, we are reminded of the words of Lewis Carroll: "Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." With such sage advice in mind, we pivot to a discussion of the literature that has laid the foundation for our investigation, providing a framework for our understanding of this rather unconventional connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data utilized in this study was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). The EPA provided comprehensive air quality index measures for Reno, Nevada, spanning the years 2009 to 2021. These measures encompassed a range of pollutants, including ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, all of which were meticulously documented and analyzed. On the other hand, the NCES furnished extensive data on instructor salaries across the United States during the same time period, allowing for a comprehensive examination of the relationship between air quality and remuneration in the education sector.

Data Analysis:
The air quality data for Reno, Nevada was scrutinized using advanced statistical techniques to calculate the average annual air quality index for each pollutant. These figures were then aggregated to derive an overall air quality index measure for the city. Concurrently, the instructor salary data was dissected to determine the average annual salaries across different states, providing a comprehensive overview of the remuneration landscape for educators. The statistical analysis entailed the use of correlation coefficients and regression models to unearth any potential relationships between air quality in Reno and instructor salaries nationwide.

Exclusion Criteria:
In order to ensure the robustness of our investigation, certain exclusion criteria were implemented. Data points that exhibited extreme outliers or anomalous fluctuations, resembling the erratic behavior of a roller coaster, were excluded from the analysis to prevent undue influence on the findings. Additionally, observations with missing or incomplete data, akin to a jigsaw puzzle missing crucial pieces, were systematically omitted to maintain the integrity of the dataset.

Control Variables:
Several control variables were meticulously considered in the analysis to account for potential confounding influences. These variables encompassed demographic factors, educational attainment, economic indicators, and regional disparities, all of which were akin to the supporting cast in a theatrical production, playing a crucial role in shaping the narrative of our investigation.

Ethical Considerations:
The utmost ethical standards were upheld throughout the data collection and analysis process, adhering to the principles of academic integrity and scholarly rigor. No data were misappropriated or misrepresented, and all findings were presented in a transparent and unbiased manner, akin to a candid conversation with a well-informed acquaintance.

Limitations:
Despite the comprehensive nature of our research, certain limitations warrant acknowledgment. The inherent correlational nature of the study precludes the establishment of causality, prompting caution in inferring direct causal effects between air quality in Reno and instructor salaries. Additionally, the reliance on aggregated data for air quality and remuneration precluded a finer-grained analysis at the individual level, akin to attempting to appreciate the intricate brushstrokes of a masterpiece from a distance.

Overall, the methodological approach adopted in this study allowed for a systematic and rigorous examination of the intriguing relationship between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8819604, r-squared of 0.7778542, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection between environmental factors and economic indicators has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. The present investigation delves into the rather unexpected and whimsical relationship between air quality in the charming city of Reno, Nevada and the salaries of instructors throughout the United States. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities may at first glance appear as nebulous as the smog itself, our analysis aims to shed light on the surprising connection that has emerged from our data.
Air quality, an often overlooked aspect of urban living, has been the subject of numerous studies highlighting its impact on public health and well-being. Reno, known for its captivating landscapes and vibrant casino scene, experiences unique atmospheric conditions influenced by its geographic location and human activities. Meanwhile, the salaries of instructors, the unsung heroes of the education sector, have been a topic of perennial debate and discussion. The confluence of these two subjects might prompt one to ponder the possibility of a serendipitous relationship or merely evoke skepticism regarding the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations.
As we embark on this intellectual voyage, we are reminded of the words of Lewis Carroll: "Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." With such sage advice in mind, we pivot to a discussion of the literature that has laid the foundation for our investigation, providing a framework for our understanding of this rather unconventional connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 indicated a robust relationship between these two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.7778542 suggested that approximately 78% of the variability in instructor salaries could be explained by the variation in air quality. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables.

Our findings underscore the intriguing connection between these seemingly disparate factors. It appears that the air quality in Reno, with its unique blend of pollutants and scenic landscapes, may indeed exert a discernible influence on the compensation of instructors across the nation. This unexpected revelation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of instructor salaries and emphasizes the multidimensionality of the factors at play in the realm of educational economics.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the notable correlation, showcasing the trend of increasing instructor salaries with improved air quality in Reno. The visual representation serves as a compelling testament to the curious interplay of atmospheric conditions and economic remuneration for educators.

In summary, our investigation provides compelling evidence of the association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the nuanced dynamics shaping compensation within the education sector. These results prompt further inquiry into the underexplored realms of environmental influences on economic variables, offering a promising avenue for future research and dialogue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020) observe a strong positive correlation between air quality and economic indicators in their study "The Impact of Air Quality on Economic Outcomes." The authors find that areas with poor air quality tend to experience lower economic growth and diminished quality of life, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of environmental pollution. However, our investigation seeks to diverge from this conventional line of inquiry by examining the unforeseen connection between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States.
Building upon this foundation, Book (2019) delves into the complexities of urban air pollution in "The Unseen Fog: A Socioeconomic Analysis of Air Quality," uncovering the intricate interplay between environmental factors and societal well-being. These insights set the stage for our scrutiny of the correlation between air quality and instructor salaries, challenging us to consider the potential influence of atmospheric conditions on economic parameters.
In a departure from the typical discourse on instructor salaries, Ipsum and Lorem (2018) explore the multifaceted determinants of educational remuneration in "Beyond the Classroom: Unraveling the Enigma of Instructor Compensation." While their focus is primarily on traditional determinants such as educational attainment and experience, our inquiry extends to encompass the unconventional influence of air quality on the salaries of educators.
Turning to non-academic works, the fictional portrayal of environmental challenges in "The Air We Breathe: A Tale of Urban Turbulence" by Fictional Author (2020) invites readers into a world where the atmosphere takes center stage in shaping human destinies, offering an alternative perspective on the impact of air quality on socioeconomic dynamics. Similarly, the dystopian narrative of "Smoke and Mirrors: The Skies Above Reno" by Imaginative Writer (2017) presents a surreal landscape where the whims of air quality intertwine with the fortunes of inhabitants, echoing the unexpected parallels we aim to elucidate in our investigation.
Notably, the internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" has garnered widespread attention for its emblematic representation of choosing one option over another, mirroring the decision-making process faced by policymakers in balancing environmental considerations with educational expenditure. This serves as a lighthearted yet pertinent reminder of the choices at hand when addressing the potential implications of air quality on instructor salaries.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 indicated a robust relationship between these two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.7778542 suggested that approximately 78% of the variability in instructor salaries could be explained by the variation in air quality. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables.
Our findings underscore the intriguing connection between these seemingly disparate factors. It appears that the air quality in Reno, with its unique blend of pollutants and scenic landscapes, may indeed exert a discernible influence on the compensation of instructors across the nation. This unexpected revelation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of instructor salaries and emphasizes the multidimensionality of the factors at play in the realm of educational economics.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the notable correlation, showcasing the trend of increasing instructor salaries with improved air quality in Reno. The visual representation serves as a compelling testament to the curious interplay of atmospheric conditions and economic remuneration for educators.
In summary, our investigation provides compelling evidence of the association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the nuanced dynamics shaping compensation within the education sector. These results prompt further inquiry into the underexplored realms of environmental influences on economic variables, offering a promising avenue for future research and dialogue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The emergence of a robust positive correlation between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States illuminates a fascinating yet unexpected dimension in the complex interplay of environmental and economic factors. The results of our study align with previous research that has emphasized the profound impact of air quality on economic indicators, as acknowledged by Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020). This finding underscores the far-reaching consequences of pollution, not only on broad economic outcomes but also on the specific remuneration of educators. It appears that the unseen tendrils of smog and pollutants extend not only to macroeconomic dynamics but also to the microcosm of individual salaries within the education sector, providing a compelling example of the pervasive influence of environmental factors.

Building upon the unconventional line of inquiry set forth by Book (2019) and the whimsical implications evoked by the internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend," our investigation sheds light on the uncharted territory of atmospheric effects on instructor compensation. The unexpected parallels drawn from the fictional realms depicted by Fictional Author (2020) and Imaginative Writer (2017) underscore the profoundly intricate association between environmental conditions and socioeconomic parameters, offering a conceptual backdrop for our empirical findings.

The compelling correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and p-value obtained through our analysis provide strong support for the substantial relationship between air quality in Reno and instructor salaries in the United States. The compelling visuals presented in the scatterplot depict a striking trend of escalating instructor salaries alongside improved air quality, echoing the whims of fate as depicted in "Smoke and Mirrors: The Skies Above Reno" albeit in a more statistically rigorous manner. These results challenge conventional assumptions and signify the importance of considering atmospheric conditions as an influential factor in the determination of educator remuneration, emphasizing the intricate dance of environmental and economic forces.

In concluding our investigation, we urge scholars and policymakers alike to consider the nuanced entanglement of atmospheric conditions and economic variables, offering a reminder that the winds of change may carry more than just ambient particles – they may, in fact, bring forth significant implications for the compensation of educators. As we continue to navigate the labyrinthine complexities of economic determinants, it becomes increasingly evident that the air we breathe may not only shape our destinies but also exert a tangible influence on the salaries we earn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection between environmental factors and economic indicators has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. The present investigation delves into the rather unexpected and whimsical relationship between air quality in the charming city of Reno, Nevada and the salaries of instructors throughout the United States. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities may at first glance appear as nebulous as the smog itself, our analysis aims to shed light on the surprising connection that has emerged from our data.
Air quality, an often overlooked aspect of urban living, has been the subject of numerous studies highlighting its impact on public health and well-being. Reno, known for its captivating landscapes and vibrant casino scene, experiences unique atmospheric conditions influenced by its geographic location and human activities. Meanwhile, the salaries of instructors, the unsung heroes of the education sector, have been a topic of perennial debate and discussion. The confluence of these two subjects might prompt one to ponder the possibility of a serendipitous relationship or merely evoke skepticism regarding the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations.
As we embark on this intellectual voyage, we are reminded of the words of Lewis Carroll: "Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop." With such sage advice in mind, we pivot to a discussion of the literature that has laid the foundation for our investigation, providing a framework for our understanding of this rather unconventional connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 indicated a robust relationship between these two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.7778542 suggested that approximately 78% of the variability in instructor salaries could be explained by the variation in air quality. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables.
Our findings underscore the intriguing connection between these seemingly disparate factors. It appears that the air quality in Reno, with its unique blend of pollutants and scenic landscapes, may indeed exert a discernible influence on the compensation of instructors across the nation. This unexpected revelation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of instructor salaries and emphasizes the multidimensionality of the factors at play in the realm of educational economics.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the notable correlation, showcasing the trend of increasing instructor salaries with improved air quality in Reno. The visual representation serves as a compelling testament to the curious interplay of atmospheric conditions and economic remuneration for educators.
In summary, our investigation provides compelling evidence of the association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries in the United States, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the nuanced dynamics shaping compensation within the education sector. These results prompt further inquiry into the underexplored realms of environmental influences on economic variables, offering a promising avenue for future research and dialogue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study illuminates the perplexing yet captivating entanglement between the air quality in the enigmatic city of Reno, Nevada, and the salaries of educators throughout the United States. Our findings have uncloaked a correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a p-value below 0.01, leading us to affirm the unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated elements. It appears that the crisp mountain air of Reno may indeed have an unanticipated impact on the fiscal compensation of instructors nationwide.

This investigation prompts us to contemplate the whimsical interplay of atmospheric nuances and economic remuneration. One may jest that while educators have long been uplifting minds, the invisible hand of air quality from the "Biggest Little City in the World" may just be lifting their salaries in unforeseen ways.

As we pause to reflect on these astonishing findings, we are reminded of the words of Oscar Wilde: "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." Indeed, the truth we have unearthed in this research reveals the enigmatic nature of statistical relationships, where even the murkiest of smog may cast a discernible shadow on the paycheck of educators nationwide.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The intersection of environmental factors and economic variables, while peculiar and whimsical, has been adequately probed in this study. It seems that the link between air quality in Reno and instructor salaries in the US is as clear as the Nevada sky on a breezy day, leaving us with nothing more to ponder on this unique connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Atmosphere and Economic Dynamics (CAED)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled When Smog Meets Salary: Exploring the Peculiar Relationship Between Air Quality in Reno, Nevada and Instructor Salaries in the US with an abstract of The present study examined the curious association between air quality in Reno, Nevada and instructor salaries across the United States using data gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics. By analyzing air quality index measures and instructor salary data from 2009 to 2021, a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8819604 and a significant p-value below 0.01 were observed, suggesting a compelling link between the two factors. Given our findings, it appears that the conversation regarding the compensation of educators may not solely revolve around academic qualifications and institutional budgets but may also encompass the unseen influence of air quality, making it an essential factor to consider in future salary negotiations.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Reno, Nevada, instructor salaries, United States, Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, compensation of educators, academic qualifications, institutional budgets, salary negotiations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Reno, Nevada
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Reno, NV
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Reno, Nevada

Instructor salaries in the US
Detailed data title: Average salary of full-time instructional faculty on 9-month contracts in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by academic rank of of Instructor
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Instructor salaries in the US

Correlation r = 0.8819604 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7778542 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Instructor salaries in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Reno, Nevada) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-5. 0.0000665755548362164200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.0067% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,021 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air quality in Reno, Nevada (Good air quality)63.013761.369960.27439.344341.369947.123356.438463.934455.342558.356266.849365.300554.2466
Instructor salaries in the US (Salary)75200739907231470306699057055272096739347408075449753717551272503




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([63.0137,61.3699,60.274,39.3443,41.3699,47.1233,56.4384,63.9344,55.3425,58.3562,66.8493,65.3005,54.2466,])
array_2 = np.array([75200,73990,72314,70306,69905,70552,72096,73934,74080,75449,75371,75512,72503,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Reno, Nevada"
array_2_name = "Instructor salaries in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2774 · Black Variable ID: 21137 · Red Variable ID: 1204
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0