Report an error
Instructor salaries in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Ticket sales for Houston Astros games | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The number of sociologists in Ohio | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Global iPod Sales | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
The number of plumbers in Virginia | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Botswana | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in Reno, Nevada | r=0.88 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Hartford, Connecticut | r=0.87 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Arson in Hawaii | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
Consumption of dry whole milk products | r=0.74 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Harry | r=0.74 | 13yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in consumer sciences | r=0.71 | 10yrs | No |
Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.7 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'pork and beans' meme | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
US household spending on pets, toys, and hobbies | r=0.64 | 13yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.62 | 13yrs | No |
Global revenue generated by McDonald's | r=-0.92 | 13yrs | No |
Instructor salaries in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)