Download png, svg
AI explanation
The excessive gusts of wind in Luxembourg were inadvertently causing Volkswagen cars in America to develop a case of "wind-power-itis." This rare and unexpected condition led to a surge in automotive recalls as the cars struggled to cope with the unrelenting influx of European air currents. The recall issues included cars unexpectedly veering off course as if driven by the invisible hand of Aeolus himself. It seems the cars just couldn't handle the sudden influx of renewable energy, leading to some rather shocking and electrifying malfunctions.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image featuring a landscape of Luxembourg showcasing an array of wind turbines with blades spinning vigorously. The turbines are surrounded by forests, with leaves and small twigs being carried through the air by the wind. In the distance, a Volkswagen Group of America showroom can be seen, where mechanics are inspecting and repairing various car components, while cars are being recalled. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Sci-fi fantacy Macabre A Discovery magazine cover image Cubism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America, in the following situation: Because the increase in wind power generated in Luxembourg caused a surge in wind turbines, which in turn led to an abundance of airborne debris. This debris then found its way into the supply chain for Volkswagen Group of America, causing malfunctions in various car components and prompting a wave of recalls.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Wind power generated in Luxembourg led to a surge in wind turbines across the landscape, with the blades spinning vigorously. As the wind picked up, it carried airborne debris such as leaves and small twigs from the forests, and the debris made its way into the supply chain for Volkswagen Group of America. Meanwhile, in the showroom of Volkswagen Group of America, cars were being recalled and mechanics were busy inspecting and repairing various car components.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Wind power generated in Luxembourg led to a surge in wind turbines across the landscape, with the blades spinning vigorously. As the wind picked up, it carried airborne debris such as leaves and small twigs from the forests, and the debris made its way into the supply chain for Volkswagen Group of America. Meanwhile, in the showroom of Volkswagen Group of America, cars were being recalled and mechanics were busy inspecting and repairing various car components. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image featuring a landscape of Luxembourg showcasing an array of wind turbines with blades spinning vigorously. The turbines are surrounded by forests, with leaves and small twigs being carried through the air by the wind. In the distance, a Volkswagen Group of America showroom can be seen, where mechanics are inspecting and repairing various car components, while cars are being recalled.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Luxembourg caused Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America Journal of Eclectic Energy Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 and p < 0.01 for 1997 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of renewable energy has been blowing up in recent years, with wind power being one of the leading contenders in the race towards sustainability. Conversely, the automotive industry has been cruising along, navigating the ever-changing landscape of consumer demands and regulatory requirements. Little did we expect that these seemingly disparate industries would come together in an unexpected and, dare I say, zephyrous manner.
Our study delves into the wind-swept world of Luxembourg's wind power generation and its unlikely dance with the automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. While one might assume that these two entities have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that may leave even the most steadfast researchers feeling a bit windswept.
As we embark on this blustery journey, it is important to note that our investigation was prompted by a curious observation rather than a preconceived hypothesis. A chance gust of wind blew into our research office one day, leading us down a path that would ultimately uncover a connection that sends ripples through the traditionally staid realms of energy and automotive industries.
The aim of this paper is not only to present our empirical findings but also to invite fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. As we unravel this breezy enigma, we hope to not only shed light on this unexpected correlation but also to inject a gust of levity into the often-serious world of academic inquiry. After all, who would have thought that a gentle breeze in Luxembourg could have such profound implications for the automotive industry across the pond?
Stay with us as we navigate through the gusty lanes of wind power and automotive recalls, for there are more surprises to come. The wind may be invisible, but its effects on disparate industries are anything but intangible.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of renewable energy has been blowing up in recent years, with wind power being one of the leading contenders in the race towards sustainability. Conversely, the automotive industry has been cruising along, navigating the ever-changing landscape of consumer demands and regulatory requirements. Little did we expect that these seemingly disparate industries would come together in an unexpected and, dare I say, zephyrous manner.
Our study delves into the wind-swept world of Luxembourg's wind power generation and its unlikely dance with the automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. While one might assume that these two entities have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that may leave even the most steadfast researchers feeling a bit windswept.
As we embark on this blustery journey, it is important to note that our investigation was prompted by a curious observation rather than a preconceived hypothesis. A chance gust of wind blew into our research office one day, leading us down a path that would ultimately uncover a connection that sends ripples through the traditionally staid realms of energy and automotive industries.
The aim of this paper is not only to present our empirical findings but also to invite fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. As we unravel this breezy enigma, we hope to not only shed light on this unexpected correlation but also to inject a gust of levity into the often-serious world of academic inquiry. After all, who would have thought that a gentle breeze in Luxembourg could have such profound implications for the automotive industry across the pond?
Stay with us as we navigate through the gusty lanes of wind power and automotive recalls, for there are more surprises to come. The wind may be invisible, but its effects on disparate industries are anything but intangible.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the environmental and economic impacts of wind power generation, providing a comprehensive analysis of wind energy's potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and reduce reliance on non-renewable energy sources. The study highlights the growing significance of wind power as a sustainable alternative, offering a gust of hope in the face of climate change challenges. However, little did the authors anticipate that the winds of change would carry implications that reach beyond environmental and economic realms to the unforeseen realm of automotive recalls.
Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a thorough analysis of automotive recalls, focusing on the complexities of identifying and addressing vehicular defects. Their work showcases the intricate web of factors that contribute to the issuance of recalls, emphasizing the extensive regulatory framework and safety considerations involved in the automotive industry. Yet, amidst the whirlwind of vehicular safety concerns, the authors may not have anticipated the gentle yet assertive nudge of wind power from across the Atlantic.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell offer insights into the evocative power of the wind and its ability to stir emotions and landscapes alike. While seemingly unrelated to the world of renewable energy and automotive recalls, these literary works serve as a reminder of the unseen forces at play in our lives, much like the unnoticed relationship between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive mishaps across the ocean.
On a more fictional note, Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" and H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" invite readers to ponder the unexpected consequences of scientific and technological advancements. Although set in divergent contexts, these narratives prompt contemplation of the ripple effects that extend beyond immediate human comprehension – much like the unanticipated correlation between wind power and automotive recalls.
In a rather bizarre twist, even the board game "Clue" serves as a peculiar analogy, with its players navigating through a mystery to uncover unforeseen connections and unexpected outcomes. Just as the players race to solve the enigmatic puzzle, our study embarks on a similarly baffling quest to untangle the windswept relationship between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America.
As we immerse ourselves in a maelstrom of research and whimsical wanderings, it becomes clear that the connection between wind power and automotive recalls may not be as straightforward as the wind itself. With each gust of information, our endeavor takes on a zephyrous aspect, blowing academic inquiry into uncharted and unexpectedly breezy territories.
References:
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Thompson, C. (2015). Harnessing the Wind: Environmental and Economic Impacts of Wind Power Generation. Journal of Renewable Energy, 21(3), 45-62.
Doe, X., & Jones, Y. (2018). Road Rumbles: Analyzing the Complexities of Automotive Recalls. Vehicle Safety Review, 12(2), 89-104.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1997 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of renewable energy has been blowing up in recent years, with wind power being one of the leading contenders in the race towards sustainability. Conversely, the automotive industry has been cruising along, navigating the ever-changing landscape of consumer demands and regulatory requirements. Little did we expect that these seemingly disparate industries would come together in an unexpected and, dare I say, zephyrous manner.
Our study delves into the wind-swept world of Luxembourg's wind power generation and its unlikely dance with the automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. While one might assume that these two entities have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that may leave even the most steadfast researchers feeling a bit windswept.
As we embark on this blustery journey, it is important to note that our investigation was prompted by a curious observation rather than a preconceived hypothesis. A chance gust of wind blew into our research office one day, leading us down a path that would ultimately uncover a connection that sends ripples through the traditionally staid realms of energy and automotive industries.
The aim of this paper is not only to present our empirical findings but also to invite fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. As we unravel this breezy enigma, we hope to not only shed light on this unexpected correlation but also to inject a gust of levity into the often-serious world of academic inquiry. After all, who would have thought that a gentle breeze in Luxembourg could have such profound implications for the automotive industry across the pond?
Stay with us as we navigate through the gusty lanes of wind power and automotive recalls, for there are more surprises to come. The wind may be invisible, but its effects on disparate industries are anything but intangible.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
The data for wind power generation in Luxembourg was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, which provides comprehensive and reliable information on energy production worldwide. The automotive recall data for Volkswagen Group of America was acquired from the US Department of Transportation, allowing us to capture the vehicular hiccups that unexpectedly merged with the winds of change. Our team spared no gust, poring over countless tables and graphs to capture the nuanced dance between the renewable gusts and the vehicular recalculations.
Data Analysis:
To untangle the zephyrous web between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America, we employed a combination of statistical techniques that would make even Aeolus, the Greek god of winds, proud. Our analysis involved calculating correlation coefficients, regression models, and time series analyses, harnessing the power of mathematical winds to reveal the breezy association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. We blew the dust off our calculators and navigated through the windy paths of data visualization, producing graphs that captured the gusty relationship between wind energy and vehicular misadventures.
Control Variables:
Amidst the swirling winds of variables, we anchored our study by controlling for factors such as GDP fluctuations, regulatory winds, and technological gusts in both the renewable energy and automotive sectors. By accounting for these variables, we aimed to ensure that the observed correlation did not simply blow in with the changing tides of other factors, but rather represented a genuine, gusty connection between wind power and automotive recalls.
Data Limitations:
Despite our meticulous efforts to capture the windy interplay between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America, we acknowledge the limitations of our data sources and analytical strategies. The swift gusts of data collection and analysis brought with them their own whirlwinds of challenges, and we cannot rule out the possibility of unforeseen gusts that may have influenced our findings. However, our commitment to transparency and academic rigor guided our journey through the gusty landscapes of empirical inquiry.
Ethical Considerations:
In our zealous pursuit of understanding the wind-blown relationship between renewable energy and vehicular recalls, we remained steadfast in upholding ethical standards of data usage and interpretation. Our research team ensured that the data sources were credited appropriately, and the findings were presented with scientific integrity. While the winds of curiosity drove our investigation, ethical compass remained our North Star in the quest to unravel this gusty conundrum.
Stay tuned as we embark on the next leg of our journey, where the winds of analysis will reveal even more unexpected gusts in the realm of renewable energy and automotive dynamics. Let's keep the sail hoisted and the data flowing, for the zephyrous mystery beckons us to uncover its hidden breezes.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .
For the time period 1997 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9131904, r-squared of 0.8339166, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of renewable energy has been blowing up in recent years, with wind power being one of the leading contenders in the race towards sustainability. Conversely, the automotive industry has been cruising along, navigating the ever-changing landscape of consumer demands and regulatory requirements. Little did we expect that these seemingly disparate industries would come together in an unexpected and, dare I say, zephyrous manner.
Our study delves into the wind-swept world of Luxembourg's wind power generation and its unlikely dance with the automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. While one might assume that these two entities have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that may leave even the most steadfast researchers feeling a bit windswept.
As we embark on this blustery journey, it is important to note that our investigation was prompted by a curious observation rather than a preconceived hypothesis. A chance gust of wind blew into our research office one day, leading us down a path that would ultimately uncover a connection that sends ripples through the traditionally staid realms of energy and automotive industries.
The aim of this paper is not only to present our empirical findings but also to invite fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. As we unravel this breezy enigma, we hope to not only shed light on this unexpected correlation but also to inject a gust of levity into the often-serious world of academic inquiry. After all, who would have thought that a gentle breeze in Luxembourg could have such profound implications for the automotive industry across the pond?
Stay with us as we navigate through the gusty lanes of wind power and automotive recalls, for there are more surprises to come. The wind may be invisible, but its effects on disparate industries are anything but intangible.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 between wind power generated in Luxembourg and automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America over the time period of 1997 to 2021. The strong positive association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8339166, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the relationship we uncovered is not merely a passing breeze, but rather a force to be reckoned with in the realm of statistical significance.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable connection we observed, revealing the wind-whipped path that leads from wind power generation in Luxembourg to the unforeseen vehicular misfortunes across the pond. The data points coalesce in a manner that would make even the most steadfast researchers murmur, "There's something in the air."
The implications of these findings are as weighty as a gale, prompting us to grapple with the breezy implications of renewable energy on automotive performance. The unexpected correlation between wind power and automotive recalls serves as a reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated variables may, in fact, be entangled in a gusty dance of cause and effect.
Our discoveries not only attest to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry but also beckon fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. This study serves as a zephyrous invitation to break free from the confines of conventional wisdom and embrace the unpredictable influences that sweep through the realms of energy and automotive industries.
As we embrace the winds of change, we must remain open to the possibility of more surprises that lie beyond the horizon. The gentle breeze in Luxembourg has indeed revealed itself to hold far-reaching implications, blowing a breath of fresh air into the often-stifled corridors of academic research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the environmental and economic impacts of wind power generation, providing a comprehensive analysis of wind energy's potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and reduce reliance on non-renewable energy sources. The study highlights the growing significance of wind power as a sustainable alternative, offering a gust of hope in the face of climate change challenges. However, little did the authors anticipate that the winds of change would carry implications that reach beyond environmental and economic realms to the unforeseen realm of automotive recalls.
Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a thorough analysis of automotive recalls, focusing on the complexities of identifying and addressing vehicular defects. Their work showcases the intricate web of factors that contribute to the issuance of recalls, emphasizing the extensive regulatory framework and safety considerations involved in the automotive industry. Yet, amidst the whirlwind of vehicular safety concerns, the authors may not have anticipated the gentle yet assertive nudge of wind power from across the Atlantic.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell offer insights into the evocative power of the wind and its ability to stir emotions and landscapes alike. While seemingly unrelated to the world of renewable energy and automotive recalls, these literary works serve as a reminder of the unseen forces at play in our lives, much like the unnoticed relationship between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive mishaps across the ocean.
On a more fictional note, Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" and H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" invite readers to ponder the unexpected consequences of scientific and technological advancements. Although set in divergent contexts, these narratives prompt contemplation of the ripple effects that extend beyond immediate human comprehension – much like the unanticipated correlation between wind power and automotive recalls.
In a rather bizarre twist, even the board game "Clue" serves as a peculiar analogy, with its players navigating through a mystery to uncover unforeseen connections and unexpected outcomes. Just as the players race to solve the enigmatic puzzle, our study embarks on a similarly baffling quest to untangle the windswept relationship between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America.
As we immerse ourselves in a maelstrom of research and whimsical wanderings, it becomes clear that the connection between wind power and automotive recalls may not be as straightforward as the wind itself. With each gust of information, our endeavor takes on a zephyrous aspect, blowing academic inquiry into uncharted and unexpectedly breezy territories.
References:
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Thompson, C. (2015). Harnessing the Wind: Environmental and Economic Impacts of Wind Power Generation. Journal of Renewable Energy, 21(3), 45-62.
Doe, X., & Jones, Y. (2018). Road Rumbles: Analyzing the Complexities of Automotive Recalls. Vehicle Safety Review, 12(2), 89-104.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 between wind power generated in Luxembourg and automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America over the time period of 1997 to 2021. The strong positive association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8339166, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the relationship we uncovered is not merely a passing breeze, but rather a force to be reckoned with in the realm of statistical significance.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable connection we observed, revealing the wind-whipped path that leads from wind power generation in Luxembourg to the unforeseen vehicular misfortunes across the pond. The data points coalesce in a manner that would make even the most steadfast researchers murmur, "There's something in the air."
The implications of these findings are as weighty as a gale, prompting us to grapple with the breezy implications of renewable energy on automotive performance. The unexpected correlation between wind power and automotive recalls serves as a reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated variables may, in fact, be entangled in a gusty dance of cause and effect.
Our discoveries not only attest to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry but also beckon fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. This study serves as a zephyrous invitation to break free from the confines of conventional wisdom and embrace the unpredictable influences that sweep through the realms of energy and automotive industries.
As we embrace the winds of change, we must remain open to the possibility of more surprises that lie beyond the horizon. The gentle breeze in Luxembourg has indeed revealed itself to hold far-reaching implications, blowing a breath of fresh air into the often-stifled corridors of academic research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
In the whirlwind of our findings, it's evident that our study has unraveled a breezy and quite unexpected connection between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Our results not only validated the earlier research on wind power's multifaceted influence but also subtly echoed the whimsical notions from the literature review.
The pervasive presence of wind power in addressing environmental concerns, as highlighted by Smith et al. (2015), resonates with our study's focus on the intricate interplay between renewable energy and automotive malfunctions. Like the undulating narrative in "The Wind in the Willows," our findings showcase the winds of change stirring far-reaching consequences that extend beyond traditional confines of environmental and economic impacts.
The unanticipated correlation divulged in our results embodies the proclivity for unexpected outcomes in the realm of scientific and technological advancements, reminiscent of the unexpected consequences portrayed in Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" and H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds." Just as these stories grapple with the ripple effects of progress, our study navigates through a gusty maze of statistical significance to uncover the unseen currents shaping the automotive industry.
In embracing the zephyrous nature of our study, we must acknowledge that our findings have set sail on a capricious voyage of scientific inquiry, akin to the enthralling exploration proposed in the board game "Clue." Much like the game's perplexing enigma, the wind-whipped relationship we discovered beckons researchers to embark on a quest to decipher the unforeseen connections that sway through renewable energy and automotive domains.
Our study's implications present a breath of fresh air, emphasizing the need for scholars to heed the unexpected and embrace the capricious influences that shape the energy and automotive landscapes. We urge our fellow academics to remain open to the possibility of more surprising discoveries, underscoring the need to explore the windswept territories of interconnected variables that may harbour unforeseen relationships – much like the stirring alliance between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Luxembourg and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of renewable energy has been blowing up in recent years, with wind power being one of the leading contenders in the race towards sustainability. Conversely, the automotive industry has been cruising along, navigating the ever-changing landscape of consumer demands and regulatory requirements. Little did we expect that these seemingly disparate industries would come together in an unexpected and, dare I say, zephyrous manner.
Our study delves into the wind-swept world of Luxembourg's wind power generation and its unlikely dance with the automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. While one might assume that these two entities have as much in common as chalk and cheese, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that may leave even the most steadfast researchers feeling a bit windswept.
As we embark on this blustery journey, it is important to note that our investigation was prompted by a curious observation rather than a preconceived hypothesis. A chance gust of wind blew into our research office one day, leading us down a path that would ultimately uncover a connection that sends ripples through the traditionally staid realms of energy and automotive industries.
The aim of this paper is not only to present our empirical findings but also to invite fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. As we unravel this breezy enigma, we hope to not only shed light on this unexpected correlation but also to inject a gust of levity into the often-serious world of academic inquiry. After all, who would have thought that a gentle breeze in Luxembourg could have such profound implications for the automotive industry across the pond?
Stay with us as we navigate through the gusty lanes of wind power and automotive recalls, for there are more surprises to come. The wind may be invisible, but its effects on disparate industries are anything but intangible.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 between wind power generated in Luxembourg and automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America over the time period of 1997 to 2021. The strong positive association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8339166, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the relationship we uncovered is not merely a passing breeze, but rather a force to be reckoned with in the realm of statistical significance.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable connection we observed, revealing the wind-whipped path that leads from wind power generation in Luxembourg to the unforeseen vehicular misfortunes across the pond. The data points coalesce in a manner that would make even the most steadfast researchers murmur, "There's something in the air."
The implications of these findings are as weighty as a gale, prompting us to grapple with the breezy implications of renewable energy on automotive performance. The unexpected correlation between wind power and automotive recalls serves as a reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated variables may, in fact, be entangled in a gusty dance of cause and effect.
Our discoveries not only attest to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry but also beckon fellow scholars to join us in deciphering the winds of change that seem to be swirling around wind power and automotive recalls. This study serves as a zephyrous invitation to break free from the confines of conventional wisdom and embrace the unpredictable influences that sweep through the realms of energy and automotive industries.
As we embrace the winds of change, we must remain open to the possibility of more surprises that lie beyond the horizon. The gentle breeze in Luxembourg has indeed revealed itself to hold far-reaching implications, blowing a breath of fresh air into the often-stifled corridors of academic research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unveiled a connection between wind power in Luxembourg and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America that is as clear as the wind itself. While this unexpected correlation may leave some feeling a bit winded, our empirical findings point to a strong positive association that cannot be whisked away. The implications are not to be taken lightly, as the wind-whipped path from wind power generation to automotive mishaps paints a picture that is hard to ignore. This discovery may jolt the academic world with the blustery realization that even the most unsuspecting variables can be entangled in a breezy dance of causation.
Our research opens up a new avenue of investigation, beckoning scholars to embrace the zephyrous invitation to uncover more surprises in the intersection of renewable energy and automotive performance. The winds of change blow unpredictably, and our findings suggest that the landscape of sustainable energy and vehicular reliability may be more intertwined than previously thought. As we wrap up this breezy expedition, it is clear that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we have already blown the lid off this windy conundrum!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Eclectic Energy Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Renewable Energy and Automotive Engineering Research (SREAER)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America with an abstract of In this paper, we present our findings on the unexpected correlation between wind power generated in the small European country of Luxembourg and the issuance of automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation from 1997 to 2021, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9131904 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our results suggest a strong positive association between the renewable energy source and the unforeseen vehicular mishaps, which could drive researchers to grapple with the breezy implications. This study opens the door to a new avenue of investigation, shedding light on the windy whims of automotive recalls – a gusty conundrum indeed.
ChatGPT:
wind power, Luxembourg, automotive recalls, Volkswagen Group of America, correlation, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, renewable energy, vehicular mishaps, correlation coefficient, p-value, renewable energy source, vehicular recalls, wind energy, environmental factors
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Wind power generated in LuxembourgDetailed data title: Total wind power generated in Luxembourg in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Luxembourg
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Volkswagen Group of America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8339166 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Luxembourg) over the 25 years from 1997 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-10. 0.0000000001932625300676111000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.9E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,174,308,748 random variables You don't actually need 5 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.81, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Wind power generated in Luxembourg (Billion kWh) | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.026 | 0.039 | 0.052 | 0.058 | 0.064 | 0.061 | 0.063 | 0.055086 | 0.064052 | 0.077468 | 0.083028 | 0.079878 | 0.10185 | 0.101486 | 0.234823 | 0.254575 | 0.281283 | 0.351135 | 0.334879 |
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America (Recalls) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 25 | 27 | 35 | 27 | 30 | 34 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.003,0.011,0.018,0.025,0.024,0.024,0.026,0.039,0.052,0.058,0.064,0.061,0.063,0.055086,0.064052,0.077468,0.083028,0.079878,0.10185,0.101486,0.234823,0.254575,0.281283,0.351135,0.334879,])
array_2 = np.array([5,6,7,6,5,6,8,8,5,10,6,9,8,2,11,5,4,11,13,25,27,35,27,30,34,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Luxembourg"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Wind power generated in Luxembourg
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Blowing in the Wind: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Wind Power in Luxembourg and Automotive Recalls Issued by Volkswagen Group of America
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 2712 · Black Variable ID: 23799 · Red Variable ID: 1120