Report an error
Wind power generated in Luxembourg correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Amara | r=0.98 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Maverick | r=0.98 | 25yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.97 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.95 | 25yrs | Yes! |
The number of social workers in Washington | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America | r=0.91 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.9 | 25yrs | Yes! |
The number of fashion designers in Washington | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New York | r=0.81 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho | r=0.8 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in Luxembourg also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)