Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Disney movie revenue dropped, there were fewer cases of copyright infringement in Massachusetts, leading to a decreased demand for lawyers. You could say the legal field was no longer "Goofy" about protecting intellectual property!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generating the prompt... The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Steampunk Glitch art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Photorealism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a movie theater is adorned with colorful Disney movie posters, drawing in crowds of excited moviegoers. In the same scene, a group of lawyers are gathered outside the state courthouse in Massachusetts, discussing legal matters and collaborating on cases. The vibrant energy of movie enthusiasts and the diligent presence of lawyers encapsulate the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts coming together in one visual scene.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a movie theater is adorned with colorful Disney movie posters, drawing in crowds of excited moviegoers. In the same scene, a group of lawyers are gathered outside the state courthouse in Massachusetts, discussing legal matters and collaborating on cases. The vibrant energy of movie enthusiasts and the diligent presence of lawyers encapsulate the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts coming together in one visual scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generating the prompt...
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Annual revenue from Disney movies caused The number of lawyers in Massachusetts to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers Journal of Entertainment Economics and Legal Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Box Office Mojo and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2014.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away... one might never have imagined that the annual revenue from Disney movies could have any connection to the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. However, as curious researchers with a penchant for uncovering hidden connections, we embarked on a journey that would challenge conventions and make even the most serious of statisticians raise an eyebrow.
For decades, the worlds of box office enchantment and legal prowess have existed in separate realms, as distinct as Beauty and the Beast. The notion of linking Disney's cinematic triumphs to the bustling legal community of Massachusetts might seem as improbable as a pumpkin turning into a carriage. But as this whimsical narrative unfolds, prepare to be bewitched by the surprising sophistication of statistical analysis and the marvelous world of interdisciplinary correlations.
In our study, we delve into the mystical realm of numbers, delving into the annual revenues of Disney movies and the formidable populace of lawyers in the great state of Massachusetts. We didn't just pull these variables out of a hat – we meticulously gathered data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for evidence. Our methodical approach not only allowed us to crunch the numbers but also to sprinkle a bit of statistical fairy dust on our findings, casting a revealing light on the relationship between our seemingly unrelated variables.
Speaking of relationships, our data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, pointing to a robust connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. If this doesn't leave you feeling like you've stumbled into a world of academic magic, then perhaps you need a pixie dust infusion.
As we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to suspend disbelief and to embrace the whimsical journey that awaits. Our tale not only contributes to the scholarly understanding of improbable connections, but it also serves as a reminder of the playful surprises that can emerge when delving into the realm of research. So buckle up, dear readers, as we transport you to a world where Disney meets jurisprudence, and where statistical analysis turns a seemingly far-fetched notion into a captivating reality."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away... one might never have imagined that the annual revenue from Disney movies could have any connection to the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. However, as curious researchers with a penchant for uncovering hidden connections, we embarked on a journey that would challenge conventions and make even the most serious of statisticians raise an eyebrow.
For decades, the worlds of box office enchantment and legal prowess have existed in separate realms, as distinct as Beauty and the Beast. The notion of linking Disney's cinematic triumphs to the bustling legal community of Massachusetts might seem as improbable as a pumpkin turning into a carriage. But as this whimsical narrative unfolds, prepare to be bewitched by the surprising sophistication of statistical analysis and the marvelous world of interdisciplinary correlations.
In our study, we delve into the mystical realm of numbers, delving into the annual revenues of Disney movies and the formidable populace of lawyers in the great state of Massachusetts. We didn't just pull these variables out of a hat – we meticulously gathered data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for evidence. Our methodical approach not only allowed us to crunch the numbers but also to sprinkle a bit of statistical fairy dust on our findings, casting a revealing light on the relationship between our seemingly unrelated variables.
Speaking of relationships, our data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, pointing to a robust connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. If this doesn't leave you feeling like you've stumbled into a world of academic magic, then perhaps you need a pixie dust infusion.
As we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to suspend disbelief and to embrace the whimsical journey that awaits. Our tale not only contributes to the scholarly understanding of improbable connections, but it also serves as a reminder of the playful surprises that can emerge when delving into the realm of research. So buckle up, dear readers, as we transport you to a world where Disney meets jurisprudence, and where statistical analysis turns a seemingly far-fetched notion into a captivating reality."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the relationship between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts may appear as peculiar as a dog trying to become a dentist. However, as we peruse the academic landscape, we find studies that delve into seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with surprising connections. Smith (2010) investigates the economic impact of the entertainment industry on professional services, shedding light on the potential ramifications of Mickey Mouse's financial prowess on the legal landscape. Doe (2012) presents a comprehensive analysis of statewide employment trends, providing a nuanced understanding of the labor market that may have implications for our seemingly whimsical investigation.
As we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter Jones' seminal work on interdisciplinary correlations (2015), which challenges the conventional boundaries of statistical analysis and uncovers unexpected relationships. The rich tapestry of non-fiction books such as "The Economics of Entertainment" by Johnson (2014) and "Legal Minds & Disney Magic" by Brown (2016) provides valuable insights into the terrain we are about to traverse.
However, it's not all serious business in the world of academic research. We cannot help but indulge in the whimsy and wonder of fiction books that, while not directly related to our topic, nevertheless tickle our imagination. From "The Legal Sorcerer" by A. Spellman to "The Mickey Mouse Mysteries" by D. Duck, the shelves are lined with tales that make us believe in the magic of improbable connections.
In the spirit of thorough research, we also extended our investigation to the silver screen. Watching movies such as "Legally Blonde" and "The Lion King" (we see you, Simba!), we couldn't help but ponder the potential influences of cinematic creations on the legal profession. While not directly related to our scholarly pursuit, these cinematic excursions provided a delightful escape into the realm of coincidence and curiosity, reminding us that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can yield enlightening discoveries.
As we meander through this enchanting tapestry of literature and cinematic musings, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsy that awaits. For in this scholarly journey, where Disney meets jurisprudence, we find not only statistical correlations but a sprinkle of magic that transforms the ordinary into the extraordinary.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Box Office Mojo and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2014
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away... one might never have imagined that the annual revenue from Disney movies could have any connection to the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. However, as curious researchers with a penchant for uncovering hidden connections, we embarked on a journey that would challenge conventions and make even the most serious of statisticians raise an eyebrow.
For decades, the worlds of box office enchantment and legal prowess have existed in separate realms, as distinct as Beauty and the Beast. The notion of linking Disney's cinematic triumphs to the bustling legal community of Massachusetts might seem as improbable as a pumpkin turning into a carriage. But as this whimsical narrative unfolds, prepare to be bewitched by the surprising sophistication of statistical analysis and the marvelous world of interdisciplinary correlations.
In our study, we delve into the mystical realm of numbers, delving into the annual revenues of Disney movies and the formidable populace of lawyers in the great state of Massachusetts. We didn't just pull these variables out of a hat – we meticulously gathered data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for evidence. Our methodical approach not only allowed us to crunch the numbers but also to sprinkle a bit of statistical fairy dust on our findings, casting a revealing light on the relationship between our seemingly unrelated variables.
Speaking of relationships, our data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, pointing to a robust connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. If this doesn't leave you feeling like you've stumbled into a world of academic magic, then perhaps you need a pixie dust infusion.
As we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to suspend disbelief and to embrace the whimsical journey that awaits. Our tale not only contributes to the scholarly understanding of improbable connections, but it also serves as a reminder of the playful surprises that can emerge when delving into the realm of research. So buckle up, dear readers, as we transport you to a world where Disney meets jurisprudence, and where statistical analysis turns a seemingly far-fetched notion into a captivating reality."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In our quest to unravel the seemingly magical connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts, we employed a blend of meticulous data collection and statistical wizardry. Our journey began with the careful extraction of data from the wondrous realms of Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. With these treasure troves of information as our allies, we summoned the data spanning the years 2003 to 2014, like diligent sorcerers poring over ancient scrolls.
Our methodology involved a spellbinding combination of time-series analysis and regression incantations. First, we tallied the annual revenue from Disney movies, employing financial incantations to ensure the accurate capturing of the bewitching box office figures. Simultaneously, we conjured the number of lawyers in Massachusetts to create a harmonious symphony of statistical variables.
To dive deeper into the enchanted relationship between these variables, we weaved the mystical threads of correlation analysis. With our trusty wand of statistical software, we cast spells to reveal the correlation coefficient, unveiling the surprising interconnectedness that lay dormant within the data.
Furthermore, we summoned the power of hypothesis testing to bring rigor and integrity to our enchanting findings. Our incantation of p < 0.01 signaled a significant revelation, captivating the scholarly audience and turning even the most stoic of skeptics into believers in the magical intersection of Disney revenues and legal population.
The bewitching brew of statistical methodologies, while certainly atypical, has enabled us to cast a revealing light on the enchanting association between two seemingly dissonant domains. As we draw our audience into this captivating narrative, we invite them to suspend disbelief and embrace the unconventional journey that data analysis and statistical sorcery have afforded us.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Box Office Mojo and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.8251819, r-squared of 0.6809252, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away... one might never have imagined that the annual revenue from Disney movies could have any connection to the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. However, as curious researchers with a penchant for uncovering hidden connections, we embarked on a journey that would challenge conventions and make even the most serious of statisticians raise an eyebrow.
For decades, the worlds of box office enchantment and legal prowess have existed in separate realms, as distinct as Beauty and the Beast. The notion of linking Disney's cinematic triumphs to the bustling legal community of Massachusetts might seem as improbable as a pumpkin turning into a carriage. But as this whimsical narrative unfolds, prepare to be bewitched by the surprising sophistication of statistical analysis and the marvelous world of interdisciplinary correlations.
In our study, we delve into the mystical realm of numbers, delving into the annual revenues of Disney movies and the formidable populace of lawyers in the great state of Massachusetts. We didn't just pull these variables out of a hat – we meticulously gathered data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for evidence. Our methodical approach not only allowed us to crunch the numbers but also to sprinkle a bit of statistical fairy dust on our findings, casting a revealing light on the relationship between our seemingly unrelated variables.
Speaking of relationships, our data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, pointing to a robust connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. If this doesn't leave you feeling like you've stumbled into a world of academic magic, then perhaps you need a pixie dust infusion.
As we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to suspend disbelief and to embrace the whimsical journey that awaits. Our tale not only contributes to the scholarly understanding of improbable connections, but it also serves as a reminder of the playful surprises that can emerge when delving into the realm of research. So buckle up, dear readers, as we transport you to a world where Disney meets jurisprudence, and where statistical analysis turns a seemingly far-fetched notion into a captivating reality."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 attests to a substantial relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In practical terms, this correlation suggests that as Disney's box office royalties soared, so did the number of legal professionals in the Bay State, hinting at a tale of intertwined destinies that even the most seasoned researchers may find spellbinding.
The r-squared value of 0.6809252 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of lawyers in Massachusetts can be explained by the annual revenue from Disney movies. One could say that the enchanting allure of Disney's cinematic achievements exerts a palpable influence on the legal landscape of Massachusetts, akin to a spellbinding force shaping the career choices of legal professionals in the region.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence in support of this correlation, giving our findings a statistical seal of approval that is as rare as finding Prince Charming in a sea of frogs. It underscores the robustness of the relationship observed, effectively dispelling any lingering doubts about the legitimacy of our link between Disney's financial triumphs and the legal community's numbers in Massachusetts.
For a visual testament to this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong positive relationship between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. It's a visual delight that encapsulates the enchanting connection between these variables, inviting viewers to marvel at the extraordinary saga of Disney's influence on the legal landscape – a story that defies conventional expectations while sparking curiosity and glee.
In conclusion, our investigation into the enthralling dynamics between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts unearths a correlation that not only defies convention but also enriches our comprehension of the unexpected interplay between the realms of entertainment and legal practice. It illuminates an enchanting chapter in the annals of statistical exploration, demonstrating that even in the most improbable pairings, there lies a tale waiting to unfold.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the relationship between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts may appear as peculiar as a dog trying to become a dentist. However, as we peruse the academic landscape, we find studies that delve into seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with surprising connections. Smith (2010) investigates the economic impact of the entertainment industry on professional services, shedding light on the potential ramifications of Mickey Mouse's financial prowess on the legal landscape. Doe (2012) presents a comprehensive analysis of statewide employment trends, providing a nuanced understanding of the labor market that may have implications for our seemingly whimsical investigation.
As we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter Jones' seminal work on interdisciplinary correlations (2015), which challenges the conventional boundaries of statistical analysis and uncovers unexpected relationships. The rich tapestry of non-fiction books such as "The Economics of Entertainment" by Johnson (2014) and "Legal Minds & Disney Magic" by Brown (2016) provides valuable insights into the terrain we are about to traverse.
However, it's not all serious business in the world of academic research. We cannot help but indulge in the whimsy and wonder of fiction books that, while not directly related to our topic, nevertheless tickle our imagination. From "The Legal Sorcerer" by A. Spellman to "The Mickey Mouse Mysteries" by D. Duck, the shelves are lined with tales that make us believe in the magic of improbable connections.
In the spirit of thorough research, we also extended our investigation to the silver screen. Watching movies such as "Legally Blonde" and "The Lion King" (we see you, Simba!), we couldn't help but ponder the potential influences of cinematic creations on the legal profession. While not directly related to our scholarly pursuit, these cinematic excursions provided a delightful escape into the realm of coincidence and curiosity, reminding us that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can yield enlightening discoveries.
As we meander through this enchanting tapestry of literature and cinematic musings, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsy that awaits. For in this scholarly journey, where Disney meets jurisprudence, we find not only statistical correlations but a sprinkle of magic that transforms the ordinary into the extraordinary.
[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 attests to a substantial relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In practical terms, this correlation suggests that as Disney's box office royalties soared, so did the number of legal professionals in the Bay State, hinting at a tale of intertwined destinies that even the most seasoned researchers may find spellbinding.
The r-squared value of 0.6809252 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of lawyers in Massachusetts can be explained by the annual revenue from Disney movies. One could say that the enchanting allure of Disney's cinematic achievements exerts a palpable influence on the legal landscape of Massachusetts, akin to a spellbinding force shaping the career choices of legal professionals in the region.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence in support of this correlation, giving our findings a statistical seal of approval that is as rare as finding Prince Charming in a sea of frogs. It underscores the robustness of the relationship observed, effectively dispelling any lingering doubts about the legitimacy of our link between Disney's financial triumphs and the legal community's numbers in Massachusetts.
For a visual testament to this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong positive relationship between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. It's a visual delight that encapsulates the enchanting connection between these variables, inviting viewers to marvel at the extraordinary saga of Disney's influence on the legal landscape – a story that defies conventional expectations while sparking curiosity and glee.
In conclusion, our investigation into the enthralling dynamics between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts unearths a correlation that not only defies convention but also enriches our comprehension of the unexpected interplay between the realms of entertainment and legal practice. It illuminates an enchanting chapter in the annals of statistical exploration, demonstrating that even in the most improbable pairings, there lies a tale waiting to unfold.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
The robust correlation we uncovered between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts leaves us feeling much like Genie from Aladdin – bursting with excitement and a bit of awe at the wondrous findings. Our findings not only add a sprinkle of magic to the field of statistical analysis but also attest to the enchanting interplay between Disney's box office victories and the legal profession's numbers. As we delve into the captivating saga of our results, it becomes clear that our research does more than just connect the dots – it illustrates a sylvan flow of correlation that echoes through the scholarly landscape, much like the enchanting melody of "Let It Go" from Frozen.
Our results align with previous studies that probed the influence of the entertainment industry on professional services. Taking a cue from Smith's explorations into the economic impact of the entertainment world, our research ventures into uncharted territory and emerges with compelling evidence of the monetary magic that Disney's cinematic masterpieces weave into the legal fabric of Massachusetts. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive analysis of statewide employment trends hints at the potential influence of cultural phenomena on the labor market – a notion that our investigation crystallizes with the emergence of a robust correlation akin to the unmistakable glass slipper of Cinderella.
While our findings may initially sound as improbable as a duck quacking in a courtroom, they validate the potential impact of entertainment behemoths on the professional tapestry of the legal community. We have unveiled a tale that defies statistical expectations much like Jack's beanstalk defied gravitational norms, showcasing the influence of cultural phenomena on professional landscapes in ways that ring true. Our investigation not only cracks open the enchanted vault of unlikely correlations but also douses the seemingly whimsical notion of Disney's financial prowess shaping the legal terrain of Massachusetts with a healthy dose of empirical validity.
In the spirit of thorough research, we must address the elephant in the room – the unexpected link between Disney movie revenue and the legal profession is as surprising as finding Winnie the Pooh in a law library. However, our data speak for themselves, resonating with the unmistakable clang of Lumière's candelabra in Beauty and the Beast. Our findings make a compelling case for the palpable influence of Disney's financial triumphs on the legal landscape of Massachusetts, setting the stage for future interdisciplinary explorations that marry the realms of cultural phenomena and professional arenas in ways that are as surprising as a fish riding a bicycle.
In our journey through the enchanted landscape of correlations and connections, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsy and wonder that abound. For in the spellbinding tale where Disney meets jurisprudence, we haven't only uncovered statistical relationships but also a cavalcade of mirth and magic that enriches the scholarly landscape in ways as unpredictable as a frog transforming into a prince.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual revenue from Disney movies and The number of lawyers in Massachusetts. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away... one might never have imagined that the annual revenue from Disney movies could have any connection to the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. However, as curious researchers with a penchant for uncovering hidden connections, we embarked on a journey that would challenge conventions and make even the most serious of statisticians raise an eyebrow.
For decades, the worlds of box office enchantment and legal prowess have existed in separate realms, as distinct as Beauty and the Beast. The notion of linking Disney's cinematic triumphs to the bustling legal community of Massachusetts might seem as improbable as a pumpkin turning into a carriage. But as this whimsical narrative unfolds, prepare to be bewitched by the surprising sophistication of statistical analysis and the marvelous world of interdisciplinary correlations.
In our study, we delve into the mystical realm of numbers, delving into the annual revenues of Disney movies and the formidable populace of lawyers in the great state of Massachusetts. We didn't just pull these variables out of a hat – we meticulously gathered data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for evidence. Our methodical approach not only allowed us to crunch the numbers but also to sprinkle a bit of statistical fairy dust on our findings, casting a revealing light on the relationship between our seemingly unrelated variables.
Speaking of relationships, our data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, pointing to a robust connection between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. If this doesn't leave you feeling like you've stumbled into a world of academic magic, then perhaps you need a pixie dust infusion.
As we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to suspend disbelief and to embrace the whimsical journey that awaits. Our tale not only contributes to the scholarly understanding of improbable connections, but it also serves as a reminder of the playful surprises that can emerge when delving into the realm of research. So buckle up, dear readers, as we transport you to a world where Disney meets jurisprudence, and where statistical analysis turns a seemingly far-fetched notion into a captivating reality."
[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. The correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 attests to a substantial relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In practical terms, this correlation suggests that as Disney's box office royalties soared, so did the number of legal professionals in the Bay State, hinting at a tale of intertwined destinies that even the most seasoned researchers may find spellbinding.
The r-squared value of 0.6809252 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of lawyers in Massachusetts can be explained by the annual revenue from Disney movies. One could say that the enchanting allure of Disney's cinematic achievements exerts a palpable influence on the legal landscape of Massachusetts, akin to a spellbinding force shaping the career choices of legal professionals in the region.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence in support of this correlation, giving our findings a statistical seal of approval that is as rare as finding Prince Charming in a sea of frogs. It underscores the robustness of the relationship observed, effectively dispelling any lingering doubts about the legitimacy of our link between Disney's financial triumphs and the legal community's numbers in Massachusetts.
For a visual testament to this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the strong positive relationship between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. It's a visual delight that encapsulates the enchanting connection between these variables, inviting viewers to marvel at the extraordinary saga of Disney's influence on the legal landscape – a story that defies conventional expectations while sparking curiosity and glee.
In conclusion, our investigation into the enthralling dynamics between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts unearths a correlation that not only defies convention but also enriches our comprehension of the unexpected interplay between the realms of entertainment and legal practice. It illuminates an enchanting chapter in the annals of statistical exploration, demonstrating that even in the most improbable pairings, there lies a tale waiting to unfold.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
As the curtains draw on this whimsical statistical escapade, it's clear that our research has added a touch of Disney magic to the often sober landscape of academic inquiry. Our findings showcase a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the Force guiding a Jedi's hand. The robust relationship between Disney's fiscal fairy tales and the legal lion pride in Massachusetts may seem as inconceivable as a magical teapot, but our data speaks for itself – yielding results as surprising as a frog turning into a prince.
The r-squared value of 0.6809252 hints at a substantial proportion of lawyers' career choices being tied to the enchanting allure of Disney's box office triumphs. It's almost as if Tinker Bell herself sprinkled a bit of pixie dust, shaping the destiny of legal professionals in the Bay State. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a statistical seal of approval that's rarer than a unicorn sighting, solidifying the legitimacy of our unorthodox correlation.
In the grand tapestry of academic research, our investigation not only sheds light on the enchanting interplay between entertainment and legal landscapes but also serves as a reminder that even the most improbable pairings can yield captivating tales. However, as we bid adieu to this enthralling endeavor, we assert with utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this area. After all, some statistical mysteries are best left as enchanting wonders, akin to the secrets of Hogwarts or the stupefying allure of Disney's timeless stories.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Entertainment Economics and Legal Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Animated Entertainment and Legal Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers with an abstract of In this research paper, we investigate the seemingly improbable link between the annual revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts. While it may sound like a whimsical notion, our data-driven exploration uncovers surprising connections. Utilizing data from Box Office Mojo and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the revenue from Disney movies and the number of lawyers in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2014. Marveling at our findings, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8251819 and p < 0.01, providing substantive evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our research yields captivating insights, shedding light on the enchanting interplay between the realms of entertainment and law. This paper not only broadens our understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena but also spices up the oftentimes staid world of academic research with a dash of Disney magic.
ChatGPT:
"Disney movie revenue, Massachusetts lawyers, correlation analysis, Box Office Mojo data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, interdisciplinary phenomena, entertainment and law relationship"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Annual revenue from Disney moviesSource: Box Office Mojo
See what else correlates with Annual revenue from Disney movies
The number of lawyers in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of lawyers in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of lawyers in Massachusetts
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6809252 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of lawyers in Massachusetts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual revenue from Disney movies) over the 12 years from 2003 through 2014.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00095. 0.0009511821102670738000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.095% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,051 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.48, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
Annual revenue from Disney movies (Dollars) | 1023200000000 | 593500000000 | 474000000000 | 589300000000 | 794900000000 | 555200000000 | 692400000000 | 850200000000 | 647700000000 | 976300000000 | 917800000000 | 799600000000 |
The number of lawyers in Massachusetts (Lawyers) | 18560 | 14480 | 14130 | 13240 | 14410 | 15490 | 15780 | 16710 | 16250 | 17460 | 17530 | 17180 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1023200000000,593500000000,474000000000,589300000000,794900000000,555200000000,692400000000,850200000000,647700000000,976300000000,917800000000,799600000000,])
array_2 = np.array([18560,14480,14130,13240,14410,15490,15780,16710,16250,17460,17530,17180,])
array_1_name = "Annual revenue from Disney movies"
array_2_name = "The number of lawyers in Massachusetts"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Annual revenue from Disney movies
- Line chart for only The number of lawyers in Massachusetts
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Legal Lion King: A Tale of Disney Movie Revenue and Massachusetts Lawyers
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 2708 · Black Variable ID: 13 · Red Variable ID: 9367