Report an error
Annual revenue from Disney movies correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Digital Realty Trust's stock price (DLR) | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of marriage therapists in Colorado | r=0.83 | 11yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Acer computers | r=0.83 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of marriage therapists in Utah | r=0.83 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of lawyers in Massachusetts | r=0.83 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Wind power generated in Mauritius | r=0.8 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'bazinga' meme | r=0.79 | 9yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=0.77 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.76 | 11yrs | No |
| Lionel Messi's goal count for Argentina | r=0.74 | 9yrs | No |
| Apple's annual net income | r=0.73 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'google' | r=0.71 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=0.7 | 9yrs | No |
| Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.69 | 7yrs | No |
| Low-fat and nonfat ice cream products consumption | r=0.56 | 15yrs | No |
| Super Bowl Champion's Winning Score | r=0.52 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Annual revenue from Disney movies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)