about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,694 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and the second variable is Lululemon's stock price (LULU).  The chart goes from 2008 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people frantically searched for where to watch Friends, they realized they needed some comfy athleisure to fully enjoy their binge-watching experience. So, they rushed to buy Lululemon leggings and loungewear, causing a surge in demand and driving up Lululemon's stock price. Loyal fans were determined to look as effortlessly stylish as Rachel or as cozy as Joey while re-watching their favorite episodes, creating an unexpected connection between 90s sitcoms and athleisure trends. Remember, Central Perk might be where Friends characters gathered, but it seems like Lululemon became the new Central Perk for fans to gather their wardrobe essentials! #BingewatchInStyle

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a cute 2D animation of a person sitting at their colorful computer desk. The person has a large pair of glasses and is busy typing on the keyboard with excitement. The computer screen shows a vibrant "Google" search page with "where can I stream Friends" typed into the search bar. A playful animated version of the "Google" logo hovers above the search bar. Next to the search results, there is a stock market graph displaying Lululemon's stock price trending upward. The person looks curious and engaged as they interact with the animated interface. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Surrealism Cute 2D animation Oragami Realistic
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A person sitting at their computer, looking up "where can I stream Friends" on Google, while a stock market graph showing Lululemon's stock price is displayed on the screen next to the search results.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: A person sitting at their computer, looking up "where can I stream Friends" on Google, while a stock market graph showing Lululemon's stock price is displayed on the screen next to the search results. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a cute 2D animation of a person sitting at their colorful computer desk. The person has a large pair of glasses and is busy typing on the keyboard with excitement. The computer screen shows a vibrant "Google" search page with "where can I stream Friends" typed into the search bar. A playful animated version of the "Google" logo hovers above the search bar. Next to the search results, there is a stock market graph displaying Lululemon's stock price trending upward. The person looks curious and engaged as they interact with the animated interface.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in where can i stream friends (Google searches for 'where can i stream friends') caused Lululemon's stock price (LULU) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price

The Journal of Internet Quirks and Market Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9232650 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Friends, athleisure enthusiasts, and curious researchers, welcome to our whimsical yet compelling inquiry into the unexpected symphony of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and the enigmatic dances of Lululemon's stock price. As we embark on this peculiar journey through the vast realms of online streaming and retail investment, we must pause to appreciate the sheer absurdity of our scientific pursuit. After all, who would have thought that the quest for an evergreen TV show and the allure of yoga pants could intertwine in such a delightful statistical tango?

With great anticipation and a touch of bemusement, we invite you to join us as we unravel the mystifying, almost mystical, correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Not unlike an episode of 'Friends' itself, our study promises plenty of surprising plot twists, tantalizing hypotheses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical humor – after all, what is research without a few cheeky puns and unexpected correlations?

Before delving into the intricacies of our investigation, it is only fitting to acknowledge the inherent charm of this unconventional pairing. Are we witnessing the triumph of comfort-seeking over financial prudence? Could it be that viewers seek solace in the antics of Monica and Chandler before making a mindful investment in stylish activewear? Or perhaps, the allure of 'Friends' and Lululemon joins forces to form a formidable duo, capturing the hearts and wallets of consumers worldwide in an unprecedented show of market influence.

As we shed light on this riveting correlation, we must tread carefully through the mazes of data analysis, semblance of causation, and inevitable urge to crack a joke or two. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for an exhilarating ride through the whimsical wonderland where streaming inquiries and stock prices converge – after all, in the words of the formidable Central Perk crew, could we BE any more intrigued by this unexpected connection? Let's find out!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Friends, athleisure enthusiasts, and curious researchers, welcome to our whimsical yet compelling inquiry into the unexpected symphony of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and the enigmatic dances of Lululemon's stock price. As we embark on this peculiar journey through the vast realms of online streaming and retail investment, we must pause to appreciate the sheer absurdity of our scientific pursuit. After all, who would have thought that the quest for an evergreen TV show and the allure of yoga pants could intertwine in such a delightful statistical tango?
With great anticipation and a touch of bemusement, we invite you to join us as we unravel the mystifying, almost mystical, correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Not unlike an episode of 'Friends' itself, our study promises plenty of surprising plot twists, tantalizing hypotheses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical humor – after all, what is research without a few cheeky puns and unexpected correlations?
Before delving into the intricacies of our investigation, it is only fitting to acknowledge the inherent charm of this unconventional pairing. Are we witnessing the triumph of comfort-seeking over financial prudence? Could it be that viewers seek solace in the antics of Monica and Chandler before making a mindful investment in stylish activewear? Or perhaps, the allure of 'Friends' and Lululemon joins forces to form a formidable duo, capturing the hearts and wallets of consumers worldwide in an unprecedented show of market influence.
As we shed light on this riveting correlation, we must tread carefully through the mazes of data analysis, semblance of causation, and inevitable urge to crack a joke or two. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for an exhilarating ride through the whimsical wonderland where streaming inquiries and stock prices converge – after all, in the words of the formidable Central Perk crew, could we BE any more intrigued by this unexpected connection? Let's find out!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The inception of our unconventional exploration prompts us to venture into the annals of academic inquiries that, albeit modestly, foreshadow the bewitching territory of 'where can I stream Friends' Google searches and the capricious waltz of Lululemon's stock price.

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) postulated a correlation between online streaming preferences and consumer behavior, awakening the notion that one's quest for nostalgia may whisper seductively to one's shopping impulses, akin to the siren call of a svelte pair of yoga pants. Expanding on this notion, Jones (2015) analyzed the impact of cult classic TV shows on market patterns, delving into the intricacies of viewer engagement and spending habits, albeit without realizing the impending uproarious dance of '90s sitcoms and activewear purveyors.

Transitioning from the academically rigorous terrain, we encounter non-fiction works such as "Streaming Wars" by Media Guru (2018) and "Athleisure Economics: A Stretchy Perspective" by Fashion Economist (2019). Although these publications offer invaluable insights into the respective domains of media consumption and retail economics, they regrettably fail to peek behind the whimsical drapes that veil the surreal link between Ross and Rachel's endearing antics and Lululemon's mercurial financial trajectory.

The fictional realm, often unfazed by the laws of empirical documentation, introduces us to the enigmatic "Tales of Streaming and Sweatpants" by Imaginative Author (2017) and the fantastical "Lycra and Laughter" by Whimsical Writer (2020). While these literary reveries transport us to captivating worlds where streaming services and apparel empires intermingle with unparalleled zest, they regrettably offer no tangible foothold for our rigorous pursuits.

Alas, in the spirited realm of childhood reminiscence, we cannot overlook the inimitable influences of "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus" – for do they not enshroud mysteries and unveil truth with the levity of discovery that resonates within our own scholarly pilgrimage? The intrepid sleuthing of Mystery Inc. mirrors our own quest for illumination, while Ms. Frizzle's fantastical escapades echo the vivacious spirit with which we navigate the convoluted highways of statistical inquiry.

Now, dear readers, as we straddle the line between scholarly sagacity and whimsical conjecture, let us soldier forth, bearing the wisdom of erudition and the joy of merriment, into the uproarious abyss of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and Lululemon's stock price – for in this multifaceted saga, who can predict the next rib-tickling twist that awaits?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2008 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Friends, athleisure enthusiasts, and curious researchers, welcome to our whimsical yet compelling inquiry into the unexpected symphony of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and the enigmatic dances of Lululemon's stock price. As we embark on this peculiar journey through the vast realms of online streaming and retail investment, we must pause to appreciate the sheer absurdity of our scientific pursuit. After all, who would have thought that the quest for an evergreen TV show and the allure of yoga pants could intertwine in such a delightful statistical tango?
With great anticipation and a touch of bemusement, we invite you to join us as we unravel the mystifying, almost mystical, correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Not unlike an episode of 'Friends' itself, our study promises plenty of surprising plot twists, tantalizing hypotheses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical humor – after all, what is research without a few cheeky puns and unexpected correlations?
Before delving into the intricacies of our investigation, it is only fitting to acknowledge the inherent charm of this unconventional pairing. Are we witnessing the triumph of comfort-seeking over financial prudence? Could it be that viewers seek solace in the antics of Monica and Chandler before making a mindful investment in stylish activewear? Or perhaps, the allure of 'Friends' and Lululemon joins forces to form a formidable duo, capturing the hearts and wallets of consumers worldwide in an unprecedented show of market influence.
As we shed light on this riveting correlation, we must tread carefully through the mazes of data analysis, semblance of causation, and inevitable urge to crack a joke or two. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for an exhilarating ride through the whimsical wonderland where streaming inquiries and stock prices converge – after all, in the words of the formidable Central Perk crew, could we BE any more intrigued by this unexpected connection? Let's find out!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic dance of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and Lululemon's stock price, our research team embarked on a journey that would make even Phoebe Buffay's quirky pursuits seem ordinary. We gathered data from 2008 to 2023, wielding the powerful tools of Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to navigate through the digital labyrinth of search queries and market movements.

Our data collection process involved constantly refreshing our coffee mugs, conducting painstaking searches for relevant variables, and occasionally giving in to the temptation of a "quick" Friends marathon during data downtime – all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, of course. With precision and a dash of humor, we meticulously recorded the search volumes for 'Where Can I Stream Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, carefully avoiding any potential interference from Joey's acting gigs or Phoebe's lyrical distractions.

Despite the often tumultuous nature of market data, we used a combination of robust statistical models, complex algorithms, a sprinkle of statistical magic, and a pinch of Joey's "smell the data, smell the data" intuition to discern the bewitching patterns hidden within the chaos. With the crafting of intricate graphs, deciphering of cryptic statistical significance tests, and a generous dose of laughter to ward off data-induced madness, our intrepid research team charted the course for uncovering the elusive correlation between the captivating pull of a beloved TV show and the captivating sway of athletic apparel stocks.

Our statistical analysis spared no effort, engaging in rigorous computations, intricately weaving together the threads of correlation coefficients and p-values, all while fervently averting the siren call of yet another Friends reference or pun. Through the meticulous application of various statistical methodologies and the collective willpower not to reference any Ross and Rachel "on-again, off-again relationship" analogies, we arrived at our compelling findings.

In the spirit of scientific transparency and a shared love for serendipitous discoveries, our methodology also involved a healthy dose of humor, an occasional nod to classic sitcom tropes, and an unyielding commitment to exploring the unconventional with a lighthearted fervor. With unwavering dedication and a touch of wit, our research endeavors catapulted us into the heart of this whimsical inquiry, where Google searches and stock prices converged in a delightfully unexpected union of data analysis and sardonic acclaim.

As the research manuscript unfolds, let us not forget that the pursuit of knowledge, like any engaging sitcom episode, is best approached with equal parts rigour and levity. And so, with a statistical twirl and a comedic flourish, let the portrayal of our captivating methodology serve as a testament to the unyielding resilience of science – and the enduring charm of socially-concocted correlations.

You can keep in touch with our hilarious quest for correlation through our #StatisticalStreamers and #FriendsAffinityForStocks hashtags. After all, in the wise (and occasionally wacky) words of the Central Perk crew, "We were on a correlation hunt!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9232650, r-squared of 0.8524182, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Friends, athleisure enthusiasts, and curious researchers, welcome to our whimsical yet compelling inquiry into the unexpected symphony of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and the enigmatic dances of Lululemon's stock price. As we embark on this peculiar journey through the vast realms of online streaming and retail investment, we must pause to appreciate the sheer absurdity of our scientific pursuit. After all, who would have thought that the quest for an evergreen TV show and the allure of yoga pants could intertwine in such a delightful statistical tango?
With great anticipation and a touch of bemusement, we invite you to join us as we unravel the mystifying, almost mystical, correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Not unlike an episode of 'Friends' itself, our study promises plenty of surprising plot twists, tantalizing hypotheses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical humor – after all, what is research without a few cheeky puns and unexpected correlations?
Before delving into the intricacies of our investigation, it is only fitting to acknowledge the inherent charm of this unconventional pairing. Are we witnessing the triumph of comfort-seeking over financial prudence? Could it be that viewers seek solace in the antics of Monica and Chandler before making a mindful investment in stylish activewear? Or perhaps, the allure of 'Friends' and Lululemon joins forces to form a formidable duo, capturing the hearts and wallets of consumers worldwide in an unprecedented show of market influence.
As we shed light on this riveting correlation, we must tread carefully through the mazes of data analysis, semblance of causation, and inevitable urge to crack a joke or two. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for an exhilarating ride through the whimsical wonderland where streaming inquiries and stock prices converge – after all, in the words of the formidable Central Perk crew, could we BE any more intrigued by this unexpected connection? Let's find out!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the volume of Google searches for "Where Can I Stream Friends" and the stock price movements of Lululemon from 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9232650, with an r-squared value of 0.8524182, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. This finding suggests that there is a robust association between the two seemingly unrelated variables.

Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating this striking relationship, capturing the essence of this unexpected union between classic sitcom nostalgia and the allure of fashionable athleisure. As we gaze upon this graph, it's hard not to appreciate the uncanny dance of data points, waltzing to the timeless tunes of 'Friends' while encapsulating the fluctuations in Lululemon's stock prices. The figures themselves paint a vivid portrait of the synchronous rhythm shared by these divergent elements, making it clear that this correlation is no mere coincidence.

It seems that "The One Where Everyone Wears Lululemon" is not just a fictitious episode title, but a statistical reality that transcends the boundaries of television screens and stock market tickers. This unexpected connection prompts a myriad of questions about the influence of cultural phenomena on consumer behavior and investment decisions—leaving us with a lingering curiosity about the intricate mechanisms at play in this comical yet thought-provoking correlation.

The robustness of this correlation encourages deeper exploration into the psychological and sociological factors that underpin this unlikely bond, opening the door to a whimsical yet compelling avenue for future research and inspiring a wave of statistical puns and playful musings. For now, our findings serve as a testament to the unpredictable and delightfully kooky nature of the scientific world, reminding us that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction – especially when it involves searching for a streaming service and investing in yoga pants!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The inception of our unconventional exploration prompts us to venture into the annals of academic inquiries that, albeit modestly, foreshadow the bewitching territory of 'where can I stream Friends' Google searches and the capricious waltz of Lululemon's stock price.
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) postulated a correlation between online streaming preferences and consumer behavior, awakening the notion that one's quest for nostalgia may whisper seductively to one's shopping impulses, akin to the siren call of a svelte pair of yoga pants. Expanding on this notion, Jones (2015) analyzed the impact of cult classic TV shows on market patterns, delving into the intricacies of viewer engagement and spending habits, albeit without realizing the impending uproarious dance of '90s sitcoms and activewear purveyors.
Transitioning from the academically rigorous terrain, we encounter non-fiction works such as "Streaming Wars" by Media Guru (2018) and "Athleisure Economics: A Stretchy Perspective" by Fashion Economist (2019). Although these publications offer invaluable insights into the respective domains of media consumption and retail economics, they regrettably fail to peek behind the whimsical drapes that veil the surreal link between Ross and Rachel's endearing antics and Lululemon's mercurial financial trajectory.
The fictional realm, often unfazed by the laws of empirical documentation, introduces us to the enigmatic "Tales of Streaming and Sweatpants" by Imaginative Author (2017) and the fantastical "Lycra and Laughter" by Whimsical Writer (2020). While these literary reveries transport us to captivating worlds where streaming services and apparel empires intermingle with unparalleled zest, they regrettably offer no tangible foothold for our rigorous pursuits.
Alas, in the spirited realm of childhood reminiscence, we cannot overlook the inimitable influences of "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus" – for do they not enshroud mysteries and unveil truth with the levity of discovery that resonates within our own scholarly pilgrimage? The intrepid sleuthing of Mystery Inc. mirrors our own quest for illumination, while Ms. Frizzle's fantastical escapades echo the vivacious spirit with which we navigate the convoluted highways of statistical inquiry.
Now, dear readers, as we straddle the line between scholarly sagacity and whimsical conjecture, let us soldier forth, bearing the wisdom of erudition and the joy of merriment, into the uproarious abyss of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and Lululemon's stock price – for in this multifaceted saga, who can predict the next rib-tickling twist that awaits?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the volume of Google searches for "Where Can I Stream Friends" and the stock price movements of Lululemon from 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9232650, with an r-squared value of 0.8524182, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. This finding suggests that there is a robust association between the two seemingly unrelated variables.
Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating this striking relationship, capturing the essence of this unexpected union between classic sitcom nostalgia and the allure of fashionable athleisure. As we gaze upon this graph, it's hard not to appreciate the uncanny dance of data points, waltzing to the timeless tunes of 'Friends' while encapsulating the fluctuations in Lululemon's stock prices. The figures themselves paint a vivid portrait of the synchronous rhythm shared by these divergent elements, making it clear that this correlation is no mere coincidence.
It seems that "The One Where Everyone Wears Lululemon" is not just a fictitious episode title, but a statistical reality that transcends the boundaries of television screens and stock market tickers. This unexpected connection prompts a myriad of questions about the influence of cultural phenomena on consumer behavior and investment decisions—leaving us with a lingering curiosity about the intricate mechanisms at play in this comical yet thought-provoking correlation.
The robustness of this correlation encourages deeper exploration into the psychological and sociological factors that underpin this unlikely bond, opening the door to a whimsical yet compelling avenue for future research and inspiring a wave of statistical puns and playful musings. For now, our findings serve as a testament to the unpredictable and delightfully kooky nature of the scientific world, reminding us that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction – especially when it involves searching for a streaming service and investing in yoga pants!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings unveil a confounding yet curiously compelling partnership between the digital quest for a quaint '90s sitcom and the financial tango of trendy athleisure stocks. The intriguing correlation we observed fortuitously aligns with prior research, supporting the hypothesis posited by Smith and Doe (2010) that online streaming proclivities may sway consumer behavior. Now, one might wonder if our statistical endeavors have indeed stumbled upon the hitherto unheralded harmony between nostalgia-driven browsing habits and the tantalizing allure of form-fitting yoga leggings.

Drawing from the vivaciously imaginative realms of 'Streaming Wars' (Media Guru, 2018) and 'Athleisure Economics: A Stretchy Perspective' (Fashion Economist, 2019), our research plunges headfirst into the enigmatic domain where digital escapism intertwines with retail economics. The tangential whimsy imparted by "Tales of Streaming and Sweatpants" (Imaginative Author, 2017) seems to have surreptitiously shimmied its way into our rigorous analysis, uncovering a delightful kinship between the binge-watching reverie of yesteryears and the sartorial exuberance of today.

As we tread into this convoluted lair of fluctuating trends and improbable confluences, our results stand as a testament to the capricious nature of market dynamics. The stunning correlation coefficient and r-squared values flaunt a dazzling display of statistical synchrony, exuding a charm that is as enchanting as it is bewildering. The scatterplot, akin to the slapstick antics of a classic sitcom, regales us with an unexpected narrative where peaks and troughs of Google searches meld seamlessly with the undulating trajectory of Lululemon's stock prices.

This sepia-tinted odyssey prompts us to contemplate the enthralling interplay between media consumption, consumer psychology, and investment trends, ushering forth a jubilant parade of statistical puns and whimsical reverie. Indeed, if "The One Where Everyone Wears Lululemon" were to be anything more than a fictional musing, it would be a resounding testament to the wily allure of statistical serendipity.

With an arched eyebrow and a twinkle of scholarly amusement, we invite further exploration into this quixotic liaison, where the wily antics of "Friends" and the sartorial allure of Lululemon intertwine in an uproarious dance of data points and market influences. For now, let us revel in the wondrous unpredictability of scientific discovery, cherishing the boisterous tapestry of insights that our research has unveiled and pondering the next whimsical turn our scholarly pursuits may take.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' and Lululemon's stock price. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Friends, athleisure enthusiasts, and curious researchers, welcome to our whimsical yet compelling inquiry into the unexpected symphony of 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google searches and the enigmatic dances of Lululemon's stock price. As we embark on this peculiar journey through the vast realms of online streaming and retail investment, we must pause to appreciate the sheer absurdity of our scientific pursuit. After all, who would have thought that the quest for an evergreen TV show and the allure of yoga pants could intertwine in such a delightful statistical tango?
With great anticipation and a touch of bemusement, we invite you to join us as we unravel the mystifying, almost mystical, correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Not unlike an episode of 'Friends' itself, our study promises plenty of surprising plot twists, tantalizing hypotheses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical humor – after all, what is research without a few cheeky puns and unexpected correlations?
Before delving into the intricacies of our investigation, it is only fitting to acknowledge the inherent charm of this unconventional pairing. Are we witnessing the triumph of comfort-seeking over financial prudence? Could it be that viewers seek solace in the antics of Monica and Chandler before making a mindful investment in stylish activewear? Or perhaps, the allure of 'Friends' and Lululemon joins forces to form a formidable duo, capturing the hearts and wallets of consumers worldwide in an unprecedented show of market influence.
As we shed light on this riveting correlation, we must tread carefully through the mazes of data analysis, semblance of causation, and inevitable urge to crack a joke or two. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for an exhilarating ride through the whimsical wonderland where streaming inquiries and stock prices converge – after all, in the words of the formidable Central Perk crew, could we BE any more intrigued by this unexpected connection? Let's find out!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the volume of Google searches for "Where Can I Stream Friends" and the stock price movements of Lululemon from 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9232650, with an r-squared value of 0.8524182, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. This finding suggests that there is a robust association between the two seemingly unrelated variables.
Figure 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating this striking relationship, capturing the essence of this unexpected union between classic sitcom nostalgia and the allure of fashionable athleisure. As we gaze upon this graph, it's hard not to appreciate the uncanny dance of data points, waltzing to the timeless tunes of 'Friends' while encapsulating the fluctuations in Lululemon's stock prices. The figures themselves paint a vivid portrait of the synchronous rhythm shared by these divergent elements, making it clear that this correlation is no mere coincidence.
It seems that "The One Where Everyone Wears Lululemon" is not just a fictitious episode title, but a statistical reality that transcends the boundaries of television screens and stock market tickers. This unexpected connection prompts a myriad of questions about the influence of cultural phenomena on consumer behavior and investment decisions—leaving us with a lingering curiosity about the intricate mechanisms at play in this comical yet thought-provoking correlation.
The robustness of this correlation encourages deeper exploration into the psychological and sociological factors that underpin this unlikely bond, opening the door to a whimsical yet compelling avenue for future research and inspiring a wave of statistical puns and playful musings. For now, our findings serve as a testament to the unpredictable and delightfully kooky nature of the scientific world, reminding us that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction – especially when it involves searching for a streaming service and investing in yoga pants!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The intertwining fates of "Where Can I Stream Friends" and Lululemon's stock price have unraveled before our eyes, revealing a correlation as snug as a pair of well-loved yoga pants. Our findings beg the question - did viewers' nostalgic yearning for Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again romance trigger a parallel yearning for the snug embrace of Lululemon leggings? Or is it that consumers, post-binge-watching 'Friends', lean into retail therapy, seeking solace in athleisure like Joey in a bowl of spaghetti?

As we bid adieu to this statistical rollercoaster, it's evident that the sitcom's timeless appeal has not only conquered hearts but possibly investment portfolios too, suggesting that "The One Where Phoebe Runs in Lululemon" might have incited more than just laughter. It seems that "The Rembrandts" aren't the only ones singing about unbreakable bonds - cue the statistically significant correlation between a cult classic and leggings that indeed prove to be a friend that's always there.

So, as we eagerly embrace this uncanny correlation, it's with equal parts curiosity and a dash of statistical humor that we conclude that no further research is needed in this domain, for sometimes, the seemingly ludicrous correlations are the ones worth treasuring. After all, in the world of research, as in the world of 'Friends', expect the unexpected!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Quirks and Market Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cross-Genre Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Streamy Affair: Unveiling the Correlation Between 'Where Can I Stream Friends' Google Searches and Lululemon's Stock Price with an abstract of In our research, we delved into the comical and utterly bizarre relationship between people's incessant search for where to stream the classic show 'Friends' and the fluctuating stock prices of Lululemon, the beloved purveyor of athleisure. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, we uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9232650, with a p-value of less than 0.01 from the years 2008 to 2023. Our findings beckon the question - is there an inherent connection between seeking comfort in the 90s sitcom and the desire for snug, stretchy leggings? Or could it be that the ebb and flow of stock prices is quite literally "hanging out" with the popularity of streaming services? Our results leave us pondering, with all due seriousness, just how much power Rachel, Ross, and the gang truly wield over consumer behavior and market trends.

ChatGPT:

search, "google trends correlation stock prices", "google search streaming influence consumer behavior", "impact of popular tv show streaming on stock prices", "Lululemon stock price correlation with tv show popularity", "Netflix Friends streaming impact on Lululemon stock prices", "Lululemon market trends google search behavior"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'

Lululemon's stock price (LULU)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Lululemon Athletica (LULU) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Lululemon's stock price (LULU)

Correlation r = 0.9232650 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8524182 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Lululemon's stock price (LULU)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'where can i stream friends') over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.4E-7. 0.0000003423239605345774000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 3.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,921,209 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' (Rel. search volume)3.50.752.416673.333331.9166712.333331.666670.51.666672.666673.5833317.916715.7518.333324.6667
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) (Stock price)23.73.9815.4434.747.577.7359.0856.0153.7165.9477.31118.89232.9351.67392.2326.88




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.5,0.75,2.41667,3.33333,1.91667,1,2.33333,1.66667,0.5,1.66667,2.66667,3.58333,17.9167,15.75,18.3333,24.6667,])
array_2 = np.array([23.7,3.98,15.44,34.7,47.5,77.73,59.08,56.01,53.71,65.94,77.31,118.89,232.9,351.67,392.2,326.88,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'"
array_2_name = "Lululemon's stock price (LULU)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2694 · Black Variable ID: 1427 · Red Variable ID: 1735
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0