about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,680 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Bo and the second variable is PACCAR's stock price (PCAR).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's simple - the more people named Bo, the more demand there is for personalized "Bo on Board" car decals. As the Bo fan club grows, so does the need for cars to slap those decals on. This surge in decorative car accessories has boosted PACCAR's stock price, driving home the point that even a name can rev up an industry.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a Polaroid style image of a bustling playground scene. Multiple children are joyfully playing on colorful play equipment, with parents watching over them. In the background, a row of shiny, big trucks is parked, catching the sunlight. Some children are playing with toy trucks, adding to the playful atmosphere. In the distance, the stock market ticker is visible, with the PACCAR stock price graph depicting a steady and increasing ascend, indicating the growing love for trucks and rising demand for PACCAR's products. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk 3D Pixar Style A photo-realistic image a Polaroid photo Macabre
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR), in the following situation: As the name Bo gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the "Bo and trucks" trend, subconsciously leading to increased love for trucks & demand for PACCAR's products, thus boosting PCAR stock.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: You see a playground filled with children playing, and many parents calling out "Bo" to their kids. In the background, there is a line of shiny, big trucks parked, and some children are playing with toy trucks. Meanwhile, the stock market ticker is running, and the PACCAR stock price is steadily rising, representing the increasing love for trucks and demand for PACCAR's products.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: You see a playground filled with children playing, and many parents calling out "Bo" to their kids. In the background, there is a line of shiny, big trucks parked, and some children are playing with toy trucks. Meanwhile, the stock market ticker is running, and the PACCAR stock price is steadily rising, representing the increasing love for trucks and demand for PACCAR's products. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a Polaroid style image of a bustling playground scene. Multiple children are joyfully playing on colorful play equipment, with parents watching over them. In the background, a row of shiny, big trucks is parked, catching the sunlight. Some children are playing with toy trucks, adding to the playful atmosphere. In the distance, the stock market ticker is visible, with the PACCAR stock price graph depicting a steady and increasing ascend, indicating the growing love for trucks and rising demand for PACCAR's products.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Bo caused PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Bo and PACCAR's Stock Price

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of finance is often considered to be a realm governed by cold, hard data and unyielding market forces, yet a rather unexpected contender has emerged in the form of first names. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a Wall Street hedge fund – the connection between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). This revelation prompted our quest to investigate whether there was more than meetS the "I" (and PACCAR's ticker symbol) in this peculiar relationship.

As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into realms that are as unpredictable as a Las Vegas buffet – but even we were surprised by the enigmatic entanglement of baby names and financial markets. However, armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of skepticism, we dared to venture into this uncharted territory. The aphorism "correlation does not imply causation" reverberated through our minds as we embarked on our quest, but the allure of unraveling this perplexing correlation proved irresistible.

So, with a statistical magnifying glass in hand, we examined data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning two decades. Our rigorous analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, with a striking value of 0.9276800. As if that weren't eyebrow-raising enough, the accompanying p-value of less than 0.01 sent our statistical radars into overdrive, forcing us to confront the possibility that this correlation might not be a mere statistical fluke.

At this juncture, we must acknowledge the critical distinction between correlation and causation, as our findings do not indisputably establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Nevertheless, the undeniable synchronicity between the undulating waves of PCAR's stock price and the fluctuating fortunes of the name "Bo" is as captivating as it is confounding. The whimsical symphony of statistical patterns and baby names leaves us wondering: is there a clandestine force at play, a hidden hand that orchestrates the rise and fall of both the stock market and baby names? Or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous dance of randomness and happenstance?

The confluence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us pondering the peculiar question: does Bo indeed know stocks? Our research endeavors to pull back the proverbial curtain and shed light on this enigmatic relationship. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in exploring the wondrous, and perhaps hilariously absurd, intersection of first name popularity and financial market dynamics. For as Karl Popper once quipped, "Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification" – and with this in mind, we aim to embrace the comical complexity of this enthralling conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often considered to be a realm governed by cold, hard data and unyielding market forces, yet a rather unexpected contender has emerged in the form of first names. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a Wall Street hedge fund – the connection between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). This revelation prompted our quest to investigate whether there was more than meetS the "I" (and PACCAR's ticker symbol) in this peculiar relationship.
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into realms that are as unpredictable as a Las Vegas buffet – but even we were surprised by the enigmatic entanglement of baby names and financial markets. However, armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of skepticism, we dared to venture into this uncharted territory. The aphorism "correlation does not imply causation" reverberated through our minds as we embarked on our quest, but the allure of unraveling this perplexing correlation proved irresistible.
So, with a statistical magnifying glass in hand, we examined data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning two decades. Our rigorous analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, with a striking value of 0.9276800. As if that weren't eyebrow-raising enough, the accompanying p-value of less than 0.01 sent our statistical radars into overdrive, forcing us to confront the possibility that this correlation might not be a mere statistical fluke.
At this juncture, we must acknowledge the critical distinction between correlation and causation, as our findings do not indisputably establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Nevertheless, the undeniable synchronicity between the undulating waves of PCAR's stock price and the fluctuating fortunes of the name "Bo" is as captivating as it is confounding. The whimsical symphony of statistical patterns and baby names leaves us wondering: is there a clandestine force at play, a hidden hand that orchestrates the rise and fall of both the stock market and baby names? Or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous dance of randomness and happenstance?
The confluence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us pondering the peculiar question: does Bo indeed know stocks? Our research endeavors to pull back the proverbial curtain and shed light on this enigmatic relationship. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in exploring the wondrous, and perhaps hilariously absurd, intersection of first name popularity and financial market dynamics. For as Karl Popper once quipped, "Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification" – and with this in mind, we aim to embrace the comical complexity of this enthralling conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between peculiar factors and financial market trends has long intrigued scholars, with researchers delving into unexpected and often whimsical variables. Studies such as those by Smith (2010), Doe (2014), and Jones (2018) have expounded on the connections between various socio-cultural phenomena and stock prices, unveiling intricate relationships that defy conventional expectations. However, the discovery of a correlation as seemingly whimsical as the link between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuations of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) has opened the floodgates to uncharted and decidedly lighthearted territory.

An examination of first name popularity and its potential ramifications on financial markets calls for a multidisciplinary approach, drawing from fields as diverse as sociology, psychology, and – somewhat surprisingly – baby name books. In "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names - Their Meaning, Origins, and Spiritual Significance" by Dorothy Astoria, the authors emphasize the significance of names in shaping individuals' identities, suggesting that the popularity of a name may inadvertently influence the collective psyche of a society. Could it be that the resurgence of the name "Bo" coincides with shifts in investor sentiment and market sentiment, ultimately manifesting in the ebb and flow of stock prices? The intersection of nomenclature and financial dynamics is indeed a curious puzzle to ponder.

On a more fictional note, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code" and "Angels & Demons," have popularized the notion of uncovering cryptic connections in seemingly disparate realms. In the spirit of Brown's riveting plots, the proposition that there exists an enigmatic symbiosis between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price becomes akin to deciphering an elaborate puzzle. Could it be that a clandestine society of name enthusiasts and traders manipulates the stock market according to the rise and fall of "Bo" in an intricate web of subterfuge and market psychology? While the prospect is undeniably humorous, it is an intriguing avenue to explore.

Additionally, the world of cinema has not been devoid of serendipitous connections. In the film "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty," the titular character embarks on a globetrotting adventure, encountering bizarre and inexplicable occurrences that challenge his perception of reality. Could the revelation of a connection between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price be on par with Walter Mitty's surreal escapades? The whimsical nature of this correlation certainly adds an element of farcical intrigue to the otherwise austere realm of financial market analysis.

As the authors aim to unravel this curiosity, their study stands at the intersection of statistical analysis, socio-cultural influences, and a dash of serendipity. While the juxtaposition of "Bo" and PCAR may evoke laughter and disbelief, it is with scholarly rigor and discerning inquiry that the researchers endeavor to shed light on this captivating, albeit hilariously absurd, correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often considered to be a realm governed by cold, hard data and unyielding market forces, yet a rather unexpected contender has emerged in the form of first names. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a Wall Street hedge fund – the connection between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). This revelation prompted our quest to investigate whether there was more than meetS the "I" (and PACCAR's ticker symbol) in this peculiar relationship.
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into realms that are as unpredictable as a Las Vegas buffet – but even we were surprised by the enigmatic entanglement of baby names and financial markets. However, armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of skepticism, we dared to venture into this uncharted territory. The aphorism "correlation does not imply causation" reverberated through our minds as we embarked on our quest, but the allure of unraveling this perplexing correlation proved irresistible.
So, with a statistical magnifying glass in hand, we examined data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning two decades. Our rigorous analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, with a striking value of 0.9276800. As if that weren't eyebrow-raising enough, the accompanying p-value of less than 0.01 sent our statistical radars into overdrive, forcing us to confront the possibility that this correlation might not be a mere statistical fluke.
At this juncture, we must acknowledge the critical distinction between correlation and causation, as our findings do not indisputably establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Nevertheless, the undeniable synchronicity between the undulating waves of PCAR's stock price and the fluctuating fortunes of the name "Bo" is as captivating as it is confounding. The whimsical symphony of statistical patterns and baby names leaves us wondering: is there a clandestine force at play, a hidden hand that orchestrates the rise and fall of both the stock market and baby names? Or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous dance of randomness and happenstance?
The confluence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us pondering the peculiar question: does Bo indeed know stocks? Our research endeavors to pull back the proverbial curtain and shed light on this enigmatic relationship. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in exploring the wondrous, and perhaps hilariously absurd, intersection of first name popularity and financial market dynamics. For as Karl Popper once quipped, "Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification" – and with this in mind, we aim to embrace the comical complexity of this enthralling conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit of unraveling the mystifying connection between the fervor for the name "Bo" and the pecuniary perambulations of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR), we employed a methodological concoction that would make the most intrepid of statistical aficionados raise an eyebrow – or two, for good measure. Our data, akin to a rare species, was diligently culled from the labyrinth of the Internet, with a special nod to the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), where we sought refuge in the sanctum of trustworthy datasets for the period spanning 2002 to 2022.

The first step in our whimsical waltz through this scholarly labyrinth was the acquisition of quantitative data on the yearly prevalence of the name "Bo" from the US Social Security Administration. With the finesse of a connoisseur selecting fine wine, we meticulously sifted through the compendium of names, ensuring that our beloved moniker "Bo" did not languish in anonymity or obscurity. Meanwhile, the financial melodies emanating from PACCAR's stock price, courtesy of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), formed the symphonic backdrop to our statistical soiree.

Eager to detect even the subtlest of statistical staccatos, we diligently preprocessed the data with the precision of a diamond cutter refining a gemstone. The tantalizing datasets were subjected to a tango of statistical transformations, including data cleansing, normalization, and handling missing values – ensuring that our subsequent analysis was free from the clutter of statistical cacophony.

With our preprocessed datasets gleaming like a rare jewel in the statistical firmament, we regaled in the harmonious dance of correlation analysis. Channeling the spirit of illustrious statisticians past and present, we invoked the revered Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the degree of association between the ebbs and flows of "Bo" popularity and PCAR's stock price. Like Marcel Proust savoring a madeleine, we indulged in the statistical feast, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9276800, a value so pronounced that it would make any statistician's heart flutter with delight.

But wait, there's more! The accompanying p-value, our trusty statistical sidekick, also emerged from obscurity to steal the limelight. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we found ourselves standing at the crossroads of statistical significance, where the jaws of probability yawned wide open to engulf our every hypothesis with unyielding scrutiny.

The statistical debauchery did not end there. Emboldened by our revelry in correlation, we ventured into the domain of time series analysis, seeking to divine the temporal nuances of this enigmatic correlation. Through the clairvoyance of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models, we endeavored to capture the mercurial rhythms of "Bo" popularity and PCAR's stock price, teasing apart the threads of causation and coincidence in this intriguing tapestry.

In our quest for scientific rigor, we applied a series of diagnostic tests to our model's entrancing predictions, ensuring that it did not succumb to the siren's call of statistical overfitting or spurious correlations. With bated breath, we scrutinized our model's fidelity to reality, seeking validation in the pristine domain of statistical goodness-of-fit measures.

In summary, our methodological escapade traversed the hallowed halls of data acquisition, preprocessing, correlation analysis, and time series modeling, culminating in a cornucopia of statistical insights. With each step, we approached our research with the exuberance of intrepid explorers, guided by the whimsical spirit that sings in the heart of every researcher – for in the immortal words of Albert Einstein, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." And so, armed with data, statistics, and a sprinkle of scholarly whimsy, we ventured forth into the enigmatic nexus of first names and financial markets, embracing the comical complexity of this scholarly pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9276800, r-squared of 0.8605901, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of finance is often considered to be a realm governed by cold, hard data and unyielding market forces, yet a rather unexpected contender has emerged in the form of first names. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a Wall Street hedge fund – the connection between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). This revelation prompted our quest to investigate whether there was more than meetS the "I" (and PACCAR's ticker symbol) in this peculiar relationship.
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into realms that are as unpredictable as a Las Vegas buffet – but even we were surprised by the enigmatic entanglement of baby names and financial markets. However, armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of skepticism, we dared to venture into this uncharted territory. The aphorism "correlation does not imply causation" reverberated through our minds as we embarked on our quest, but the allure of unraveling this perplexing correlation proved irresistible.
So, with a statistical magnifying glass in hand, we examined data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning two decades. Our rigorous analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, with a striking value of 0.9276800. As if that weren't eyebrow-raising enough, the accompanying p-value of less than 0.01 sent our statistical radars into overdrive, forcing us to confront the possibility that this correlation might not be a mere statistical fluke.
At this juncture, we must acknowledge the critical distinction between correlation and causation, as our findings do not indisputably establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Nevertheless, the undeniable synchronicity between the undulating waves of PCAR's stock price and the fluctuating fortunes of the name "Bo" is as captivating as it is confounding. The whimsical symphony of statistical patterns and baby names leaves us wondering: is there a clandestine force at play, a hidden hand that orchestrates the rise and fall of both the stock market and baby names? Or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous dance of randomness and happenstance?
The confluence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us pondering the peculiar question: does Bo indeed know stocks? Our research endeavors to pull back the proverbial curtain and shed light on this enigmatic relationship. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in exploring the wondrous, and perhaps hilariously absurd, intersection of first name popularity and financial market dynamics. For as Karl Popper once quipped, "Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification" – and with this in mind, we aim to embrace the comical complexity of this enthralling conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if "Bo" whispered stock market secrets to investors in their sleep, creating an uncanny harmony in their fluctuations.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this unexpected connection, depicting a nearly linear relationship akin to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, the uncanny symmetry between "Bo" and PCAR. The r-squared value of 0.8605901 further reinforced the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that nearly 86% of the variability in PCAR's stock price could be explained by the popularity of the name "Bo" – a statistical marvel that would make even the most stoic economist raise an eyebrow.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings provide compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a figment of statistical imagination. It seems that "Bo" isn't just a popular name; it might also hold some mysterious sway over the stock market, or vice versa. The statistical significance of our results lends weight to the notion that there may be an underlying link, albeit one that remains shrouded in mystery and speculation.

While our study could not definitively establish causation – after all, correlation isn't causation, unless you're talking about coffee consumption and productivity – the parallels between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price fluctuations are as intriguing as they are puzzling. This enigmatic relationship beckons further investigation, drawing attention to the quirky confluence of human behavior and market dynamics. Much like a good magician, the nuanced interplay between these variables leaves us wondering what untold secrets "Bo" might hold about the financial world.

In conclusion, our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the unexpected camaraderie between baby names and stock market movements. It invites further exploration into this whimsical pairing, posing the playful proposition: does Bo indeed know stocks? As we navigate this peculiar juncture of first name popularity and financial intricacies, our study raises more questions than it answers, leaving us with the delightful challenge of unraveling this charming yet confounding correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between peculiar factors and financial market trends has long intrigued scholars, with researchers delving into unexpected and often whimsical variables. Studies such as those by Smith (2010), Doe (2014), and Jones (2018) have expounded on the connections between various socio-cultural phenomena and stock prices, unveiling intricate relationships that defy conventional expectations. However, the discovery of a correlation as seemingly whimsical as the link between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuations of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) has opened the floodgates to uncharted and decidedly lighthearted territory.
An examination of first name popularity and its potential ramifications on financial markets calls for a multidisciplinary approach, drawing from fields as diverse as sociology, psychology, and – somewhat surprisingly – baby name books. In "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names - Their Meaning, Origins, and Spiritual Significance" by Dorothy Astoria, the authors emphasize the significance of names in shaping individuals' identities, suggesting that the popularity of a name may inadvertently influence the collective psyche of a society. Could it be that the resurgence of the name "Bo" coincides with shifts in investor sentiment and market sentiment, ultimately manifesting in the ebb and flow of stock prices? The intersection of nomenclature and financial dynamics is indeed a curious puzzle to ponder.
On a more fictional note, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code" and "Angels & Demons," have popularized the notion of uncovering cryptic connections in seemingly disparate realms. In the spirit of Brown's riveting plots, the proposition that there exists an enigmatic symbiosis between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price becomes akin to deciphering an elaborate puzzle. Could it be that a clandestine society of name enthusiasts and traders manipulates the stock market according to the rise and fall of "Bo" in an intricate web of subterfuge and market psychology? While the prospect is undeniably humorous, it is an intriguing avenue to explore.
Additionally, the world of cinema has not been devoid of serendipitous connections. In the film "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty," the titular character embarks on a globetrotting adventure, encountering bizarre and inexplicable occurrences that challenge his perception of reality. Could the revelation of a connection between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price be on par with Walter Mitty's surreal escapades? The whimsical nature of this correlation certainly adds an element of farcical intrigue to the otherwise austere realm of financial market analysis.
As the authors aim to unravel this curiosity, their study stands at the intersection of statistical analysis, socio-cultural influences, and a dash of serendipity. While the juxtaposition of "Bo" and PCAR may evoke laughter and disbelief, it is with scholarly rigor and discerning inquiry that the researchers endeavor to shed light on this captivating, albeit hilariously absurd, correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if "Bo" whispered stock market secrets to investors in their sleep, creating an uncanny harmony in their fluctuations.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this unexpected connection, depicting a nearly linear relationship akin to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, the uncanny symmetry between "Bo" and PCAR. The r-squared value of 0.8605901 further reinforced the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that nearly 86% of the variability in PCAR's stock price could be explained by the popularity of the name "Bo" – a statistical marvel that would make even the most stoic economist raise an eyebrow.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings provide compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a figment of statistical imagination. It seems that "Bo" isn't just a popular name; it might also hold some mysterious sway over the stock market, or vice versa. The statistical significance of our results lends weight to the notion that there may be an underlying link, albeit one that remains shrouded in mystery and speculation.
While our study could not definitively establish causation – after all, correlation isn't causation, unless you're talking about coffee consumption and productivity – the parallels between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price fluctuations are as intriguing as they are puzzling. This enigmatic relationship beckons further investigation, drawing attention to the quirky confluence of human behavior and market dynamics. Much like a good magician, the nuanced interplay between these variables leaves us wondering what untold secrets "Bo" might hold about the financial world.
In conclusion, our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the unexpected camaraderie between baby names and stock market movements. It invites further exploration into this whimsical pairing, posing the playful proposition: does Bo indeed know stocks? As we navigate this peculiar juncture of first name popularity and financial intricacies, our study raises more questions than it answers, leaving us with the delightful challenge of unraveling this charming yet confounding correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The elucidation of a substantial correlation between the popularity of the name "Bo" and the stock price of PACCAR (PCAR) provides a comical yet intriguing addition to the steadily expanding literature on offbeat variables in financial market trends. Our findings not only confirm but also extend the works of Smith (2010), Doe (2014), and Jones (2018), injecting new whimsy into the often austere realm of market analysis. Armed with statistical evidence that rivals the serendipitous discovery of a unicorn in a forest, we have bolstered the argument that there exists a legitimate and robust correlation between the enigmatic "Bo" and the mercurial PCAR stock price.

The amusing parallels witnessed in our analysis are reminiscent of a rendezvous between Bertie Wooster and Jeeves from P.G. Wodehouse's legendary tales - an unexpected duo that, against all odds, seems to collaborate with undeniable harmony. However, our research does not merely serve as fodder for humorous anecdotes; rather, it underscores a curious undercurrent in the intertwined tapestry of human behavioral influences and financial dynamics.

Our meandering exploration into the unassuming territory of baby names and stock prices has yielded a discovery that is akin to stumbling upon a particularly amusing Easter egg in a serious mathematical thriller. The striking correlation coefficient and the delightfully diminutive p-value effectively fortified our contention that the "Bo"-tiful relationship between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price movements is not merely a figment of statistical whimsy. Our results demand that we entertain the notion that there may indeed be a hitherto unacknowledged, quasi-mystical connection, possibly involving psychic whispers of "Bo" gently guiding market forces or the astute perception of investors channeling their trust into the name "Bo."

While the specter of causation remains tantalizingly elusive, like a cleverly concealed Easter egg that teases and taunts the observer, it is clear that the name "Bo" wields an unexpectedly potent influence in the financial domains, leaving researchers and market aficionados alike bemused and captivated. As we gaze at this serendipitous symphony of statistical significance and comic relief, we are drawn to wonder: perhaps the fabled "Bo" truly knows stocks? This whimsical conundrum, much like a dazzling magic act, compels us to look beyond the veneer of conventional expectations and invites us to embrace the enchanting peculiarity of this correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bo and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name "Bo" and PACCAR's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.

While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of finance is often considered to be a realm governed by cold, hard data and unyielding market forces, yet a rather unexpected contender has emerged in the form of first names. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a Wall Street hedge fund – the connection between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). This revelation prompted our quest to investigate whether there was more than meetS the "I" (and PACCAR's ticker symbol) in this peculiar relationship.
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into realms that are as unpredictable as a Las Vegas buffet – but even we were surprised by the enigmatic entanglement of baby names and financial markets. However, armed with statistical prowess and a healthy dose of skepticism, we dared to venture into this uncharted territory. The aphorism "correlation does not imply causation" reverberated through our minds as we embarked on our quest, but the allure of unraveling this perplexing correlation proved irresistible.
So, with a statistical magnifying glass in hand, we examined data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning two decades. Our rigorous analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, with a striking value of 0.9276800. As if that weren't eyebrow-raising enough, the accompanying p-value of less than 0.01 sent our statistical radars into overdrive, forcing us to confront the possibility that this correlation might not be a mere statistical fluke.
At this juncture, we must acknowledge the critical distinction between correlation and causation, as our findings do not indisputably establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Nevertheless, the undeniable synchronicity between the undulating waves of PCAR's stock price and the fluctuating fortunes of the name "Bo" is as captivating as it is confounding. The whimsical symphony of statistical patterns and baby names leaves us wondering: is there a clandestine force at play, a hidden hand that orchestrates the rise and fall of both the stock market and baby names? Or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous dance of randomness and happenstance?
The confluence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us pondering the peculiar question: does Bo indeed know stocks? Our research endeavors to pull back the proverbial curtain and shed light on this enigmatic relationship. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in exploring the wondrous, and perhaps hilariously absurd, intersection of first name popularity and financial market dynamics. For as Karl Popper once quipped, "Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification" – and with this in mind, we aim to embrace the comical complexity of this enthralling conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if "Bo" whispered stock market secrets to investors in their sleep, creating an uncanny harmony in their fluctuations.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this unexpected connection, depicting a nearly linear relationship akin to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, the uncanny symmetry between "Bo" and PCAR. The r-squared value of 0.8605901 further reinforced the robustness of this correlation, suggesting that nearly 86% of the variability in PCAR's stock price could be explained by the popularity of the name "Bo" – a statistical marvel that would make even the most stoic economist raise an eyebrow.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings provide compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a figment of statistical imagination. It seems that "Bo" isn't just a popular name; it might also hold some mysterious sway over the stock market, or vice versa. The statistical significance of our results lends weight to the notion that there may be an underlying link, albeit one that remains shrouded in mystery and speculation.
While our study could not definitively establish causation – after all, correlation isn't causation, unless you're talking about coffee consumption and productivity – the parallels between the name "Bo" and PCAR's stock price fluctuations are as intriguing as they are puzzling. This enigmatic relationship beckons further investigation, drawing attention to the quirky confluence of human behavior and market dynamics. Much like a good magician, the nuanced interplay between these variables leaves us wondering what untold secrets "Bo" might hold about the financial world.
In conclusion, our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the unexpected camaraderie between baby names and stock market movements. It invites further exploration into this whimsical pairing, posing the playful proposition: does Bo indeed know stocks? As we navigate this peculiar juncture of first name popularity and financial intricacies, our study raises more questions than it answers, leaving us with the delightful challenge of unraveling this charming yet confounding correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our exploration of the delightful dalliance between the name "Bo" and PACCAR's stock price, we find ourselves amidst the intriguing interplay of statistics and whimsy. While our findings unveil a correlation that's as snug as two peas in a pod, we must tread lightly in assuming causation – after all, correlation doesn't imply causation, unless you're talking about umbrellas and rain. The statistical aura surrounding this captivating correlation, with a robust correlation coefficient akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack, beckons us to venture deeper into this endearing enigma.

As we bid adieu to this scholarly sojourn, we do so with a lighthearted grin and a promise that no more research is needed in this curious domain of "Bo" and stocks. For as Dorothy Parker cheekily remarked, "The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." And with this, we leave our fellow researchers with the amusing camaraderie of our findings – a testament to the charming caprice of statistical romance, where "Bo" may just know stocks after all. So, on that note, we tip our hats to the fascinating world of baby names and financial markets, bidding adieu with a twinkle in our eyes and an irrepressible curiosity for the delightful mysteries that await in the scholarly playground of charming correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Bo and PACCAR's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Bo and PACCAR's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Name-Stock Correlation Studies (INSCS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bo Knows Stocks: The Curious Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Bo and PACCAR's Stock Price with an abstract of This study aimed to unravel the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name "Bo" and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the uncharted territory of first name popularity and financial markets. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9276800 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022.
While causation cannot be definitively inferred from our findings, it is undeniably intriguing that the ascent and descent of the PCAR stock price seems to mirror the ebb and flow of popularity for the name "Bo." Could it be mere coincidence, or is there a deeper, underlying connection that eludes conventional wisdom? Our research sheds light on this enigmatic phenomenon, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of baby names and stock market trends. Amusingly, the "Bo"-tiful symmetry between these seemingly unrelated variables begs the question: does Bo truly know stocks?

ChatGPT:

"Bo name popularity," "PACCAR stock price correlation," "first name popularity and financial markets," "Bo and PCAR stock price link," "stock market trends," "baby names impact on stock," "correlation coefficient," "LSEG Analytics," "US Social Security Administration data," "financial market analysis," "causation in financial markets," "stock market research."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Bo
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Bo
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Bo

PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)
Detailed data title: Opening price of PACCAR (PCAR) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)

Correlation r = 0.9276800 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8605901 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Bo) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-9. 0.0000000014353168936304780000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 696,710,256 random variables You don't actually need 696 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Bo (Babies born)173203215279297307282305274311308344427451479453515524545662641
PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) (Stock price)7.938.3615.3721.9418.9226.6833.1417.522.6335.523.5928.2736.6243.0330.2142.3648.3837.5152.7957.7458.84




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([173,203,215,279,297,307,282,305,274,311,308,344,427,451,479,453,515,524,545,662,641,])
array_2 = np.array([7.93,8.36,15.37,21.94,18.92,26.68,33.14,17.5,22.63,35.5,23.59,28.27,36.62,43.03,30.21,42.36,48.38,37.51,52.79,57.74,58.84,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Bo"
array_2_name = "PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2680 · Black Variable ID: 3661 · Red Variable ID: 1756
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0