about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,677 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Milk consumption and the second variable is Burglaries in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The calcium from milk helps people grow stronger bones, making it more difficult for burglars to sneak in through windows or climb fences. With fewer calcium-fortified obstacles, burglars in Pennsylvania found it increasingly challenging to carry out their illicit activities, leading to a decrease in overall burglary rates.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover that depicts a quaint Pennsylvania town with a group of milk robbers fleeing with stolen cartons of milk. Show the townspeople transitioning to drinking less milk, and the previously chaotic scene of milk-induced lactose intolerance tantrums and dairy-related burglaries starting to calm down. Depict the once wild-eyed robbers peacefully sipping glasses of almond milk, content with their healthier choice. The image should be a vibrant depiction of the quirky transition, with a focus on the transformation of the town's atmosphere surrounding dairy consumption. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Art nouveau A TIME magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As milk consumption decreased, so did dairy-induced lactose intolerance tantrums, leading to less "utter" chaos and fewer "dairy" hair-raising heists in Pennsylvania. It seems the only thing milk robbers were "cereal-sly" in need of was a healthier diet!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quaint Pennsylvania town, a group of milk robbers are seen fleeing with stolen cartons of milk. However, as the townspeople transition to drinking less milk, the previously chaotic scene of milk-induced lactose intolerance tantrums and dairy-related burglaries starts to calm down. The once wild-eyed robbers are now peacefully sipping glasses of almond milk, content with their healthier choice.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a quaint Pennsylvania town, a group of milk robbers are seen fleeing with stolen cartons of milk. However, as the townspeople transition to drinking less milk, the previously chaotic scene of milk-induced lactose intolerance tantrums and dairy-related burglaries starts to calm down. The once wild-eyed robbers are now peacefully sipping glasses of almond milk, content with their healthier choice. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover that depicts a quaint Pennsylvania town with a group of milk robbers fleeing with stolen cartons of milk. Show the townspeople transitioning to drinking less milk, and the previously chaotic scene of milk-induced lactose intolerance tantrums and dairy-related burglaries starting to calm down. Depict the once wild-eyed robbers peacefully sipping glasses of almond milk, content with their healthier choice. The image should be a vibrant depiction of the quirky transition, with a focus on the transformation of the town's atmosphere surrounding dairy consumption.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Burglaries in Pennsylvania to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

The Journal of Dairy Delinquency

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Milk and burglaries may sound like an utterly bizarre combination, but as the old saying goes, "curiosity curdled the cat." In this study, we dive into the udderly surprising realm of dairy consumption and its potential link to criminal activities, specifically burglaries, in the Keystone State. As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "moo-d" for unconventional investigations, and this one certainly takes the cake – or should I say, the cheese?

The idea that one's milk intake could have any bearing on the occurrence of home invasions seems utterly mooo-t, but as statisticians, we are "udderly" devoted to exploring unusual correlations. Our aim in this endeavor is not just to churn out data but to skim through the numbers and unveil any potential patterns that may have been lying latent, much like the cream on top of a jug of fresh milk.

Of course, we approach this research with a sense of humor and whimsy, but underpinning it all is a rigorous commitment to scientific inquiry. Our investigation covers a period of over three decades, spanning from 1990 to 2021, leveraging oodles of data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we sought to determine whether there was any merit to the notion that milk and burglaries could be silently dancing a minuet in the realm of Pennsylvania's criminal activities.

Some may wonder if we are simply milking this idea for all it's worth, but as any good researchers would know, it's critical not to cry over spilled milk until the evidence has been thoroughly examined. So, without further ado, let's pour over the data and see if we can squeeze out any meaningful insights from this unexpected, yet utterly captivating, connection.

Join us as we embark on a bovine-inspired escapade through the pastures of Pennsylvania data, don our statistical thinking caps, and seek to decipher whether there's more to this udderly peculiar relationship between milk consumption and burglaries than meets the eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Milk and burglaries may sound like an utterly bizarre combination, but as the old saying goes, "curiosity curdled the cat." In this study, we dive into the udderly surprising realm of dairy consumption and its potential link to criminal activities, specifically burglaries, in the Keystone State. As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "moo-d" for unconventional investigations, and this one certainly takes the cake – or should I say, the cheese?
The idea that one's milk intake could have any bearing on the occurrence of home invasions seems utterly mooo-t, but as statisticians, we are "udderly" devoted to exploring unusual correlations. Our aim in this endeavor is not just to churn out data but to skim through the numbers and unveil any potential patterns that may have been lying latent, much like the cream on top of a jug of fresh milk.
Of course, we approach this research with a sense of humor and whimsy, but underpinning it all is a rigorous commitment to scientific inquiry. Our investigation covers a period of over three decades, spanning from 1990 to 2021, leveraging oodles of data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we sought to determine whether there was any merit to the notion that milk and burglaries could be silently dancing a minuet in the realm of Pennsylvania's criminal activities.
Some may wonder if we are simply milking this idea for all it's worth, but as any good researchers would know, it's critical not to cry over spilled milk until the evidence has been thoroughly examined. So, without further ado, let's pour over the data and see if we can squeeze out any meaningful insights from this unexpected, yet utterly captivating, connection.
Join us as we embark on a bovine-inspired escapade through the pastures of Pennsylvania data, don our statistical thinking caps, and seek to decipher whether there's more to this udderly peculiar relationship between milk consumption and burglaries than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the curious correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania is, unsurprisingly, rather sparse. However, the few existing studies on related phenomena do offer some fascinating insights. Smith et al. (2010), in their seminal work "Dairy Dilemmas: Exploring Unconventional Associations," presented intriguing findings on the potential impact of dairy products on human behavior. While their focus was not specifically on criminal activities, their work laid the groundwork for questioning the seemingly mundane role of milk in daily life.

Moving from the "udderly" serious to the utterly comical, the works of Doe and Jones (2014) in "Got Milked? Unveiling the Milky Way of Life" shed light on the societal significance of milk consumption. Their witty anecdotes and whimsical observations on the cultural connotations of milk provide a delightful perspective on the topic at hand. It is remarkable how such an ostensibly innocuous subject can be so thoroughly dissected and examined from a multitude of angles.

In the realm of fiction, the classic novel "Milk and Burglars: A Dairy Tale" by E. B. Mooster (2003) offers a whimsical depiction of a world where milk and burglaries intertwine in unexpected ways. While clearly not a scholarly work, the imaginative storytelling and clever wordplay in this novel serve as a gentle reminder that the perceptions of milk and its relationship to crime are not confined to the rigor of academic inquiry.

In a more cinematic representation, the acclaimed film "The Great Dairy Heist" (2007) provides a playful, yet thought-provoking exploration of the potential nuances underlying the connection between milk consumption and criminal activities. The film's artistic portrayal of the delicate balance between creamy indulgence and clandestine capers captures the essence of the unconventional phenomenon under investigation.

As we immerse ourselves in this lighthearted exploration, it is essential to remember that amidst the jest, there lies a genuine quest for understanding. While the literature may span the spectrum from serious scholarly research to whimsical fiction and cinematic storytelling, each facet adds a touch of flavor to our quest for enlightenment in the realm of milk and burglaries in Pennsylvania.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Milk and burglaries may sound like an utterly bizarre combination, but as the old saying goes, "curiosity curdled the cat." In this study, we dive into the udderly surprising realm of dairy consumption and its potential link to criminal activities, specifically burglaries, in the Keystone State. As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "moo-d" for unconventional investigations, and this one certainly takes the cake – or should I say, the cheese?
The idea that one's milk intake could have any bearing on the occurrence of home invasions seems utterly mooo-t, but as statisticians, we are "udderly" devoted to exploring unusual correlations. Our aim in this endeavor is not just to churn out data but to skim through the numbers and unveil any potential patterns that may have been lying latent, much like the cream on top of a jug of fresh milk.
Of course, we approach this research with a sense of humor and whimsy, but underpinning it all is a rigorous commitment to scientific inquiry. Our investigation covers a period of over three decades, spanning from 1990 to 2021, leveraging oodles of data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we sought to determine whether there was any merit to the notion that milk and burglaries could be silently dancing a minuet in the realm of Pennsylvania's criminal activities.
Some may wonder if we are simply milking this idea for all it's worth, but as any good researchers would know, it's critical not to cry over spilled milk until the evidence has been thoroughly examined. So, without further ado, let's pour over the data and see if we can squeeze out any meaningful insights from this unexpected, yet utterly captivating, connection.
Join us as we embark on a bovine-inspired escapade through the pastures of Pennsylvania data, don our statistical thinking caps, and seek to decipher whether there's more to this udderly peculiar relationship between milk consumption and burglaries than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unearth the creamy truth behind the unexpected association between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania, the research team embarked on a curdled journey through statistical analysis and data delving.

Data Collection:
The first step in our endeavor involved sourcing data that could provide insights into milk consumption and burglary rates. We scoured the vast pastures of the internet, grazing on information from reputable sources such as the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our data spanned from 1990 to 2021, capturing a generous slice of time to ensure we didn't milk the correlation for all it's worth without considering long-term trends.

Milk Consumption Metrics:
Ah, the fruitful fields of milk data! Here, we gathered information on per capita milk consumption in Pennsylvania. We mooo-ved through annual data, keeping our eyes peeled for any statistical anomalies, outliers, or unusual fluctuations in milk intake. After all, we didn't want to cry over spilled milk if the data was udderly unreliable or if there were any sour grapes in the mix.

Burglary Rates:
The FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services provided us with a bountiful harvest of burglary statistics. We carefully examined the incidence of reported burglaries, ensuring that we were not comparing apples to oranges or, in this case, milk to... well, burglaries.

Statistical Analyses:
With our data in hand, we hunkered down and milked the statistical tools at our disposal. We performed regression analyses, leveraging the power of correlation coefficients to unearth any potential links between milk consumption and burglary rates. We also assessed the p-value, ensuring that our findings were not just statistical noise but udderly meaningful.

Control Variables:
To prevent any confounding effects from moo-ving the results in unexpected directions, we considered a pasture of control variables. Factors such as population density, economic indicators, and even moo-d changes in weather conditions were carefully factored into our analyses. After all, we didn't want to be accused of cherrypicking data or milking the results for all they were worth without considering the broader context.

Ethical Considerations:
As researchers, we also milked the ethical implications of our investigation. Ensuring that our data handling and analyses were conducted with utmost integrity and respect for privacy was paramount. After all, we wanted the public to trust our findings, not view them as a pile of... well, you get the point.

In conclusion, our research methodology was as rigorous as it was whimsical. We didn't just skim the surface of the data – we delved deep into the creamy depths, armed with statistical mooskills and a hefty dose of scientific curiosity. With our methods in place, we were ready to churn through the numbers and see if we could procure a creamy conclusion from this utterly captivating, and slightly "cheesy," investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9571037, r-squared of 0.9160475, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Milk and burglaries may sound like an utterly bizarre combination, but as the old saying goes, "curiosity curdled the cat." In this study, we dive into the udderly surprising realm of dairy consumption and its potential link to criminal activities, specifically burglaries, in the Keystone State. As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "moo-d" for unconventional investigations, and this one certainly takes the cake – or should I say, the cheese?
The idea that one's milk intake could have any bearing on the occurrence of home invasions seems utterly mooo-t, but as statisticians, we are "udderly" devoted to exploring unusual correlations. Our aim in this endeavor is not just to churn out data but to skim through the numbers and unveil any potential patterns that may have been lying latent, much like the cream on top of a jug of fresh milk.
Of course, we approach this research with a sense of humor and whimsy, but underpinning it all is a rigorous commitment to scientific inquiry. Our investigation covers a period of over three decades, spanning from 1990 to 2021, leveraging oodles of data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we sought to determine whether there was any merit to the notion that milk and burglaries could be silently dancing a minuet in the realm of Pennsylvania's criminal activities.
Some may wonder if we are simply milking this idea for all it's worth, but as any good researchers would know, it's critical not to cry over spilled milk until the evidence has been thoroughly examined. So, without further ado, let's pour over the data and see if we can squeeze out any meaningful insights from this unexpected, yet utterly captivating, connection.
Join us as we embark on a bovine-inspired escapade through the pastures of Pennsylvania data, don our statistical thinking caps, and seek to decipher whether there's more to this udderly peculiar relationship between milk consumption and burglaries than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The moment of truth has arrived, and the results of our study have left us utterly churned up. After analyzing the data from 1990 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9571037 between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's enough to make anyone utter a surprised "udderly mooo-ving!"

The r-squared value of 0.9160475 indicates that a whopping 91.6% of the variation in burglary rates can be explained by the variation in milk consumption. This finding is "milk-iculously" high and suggests that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. Perhaps the burglars in Pennsylvania have been supplementing their nefarious activities with a hearty glass of milk?

The p-value of < 0.01 has us feeling like we've struck gold in a dairy farm – this result is statistically significant and indicates that the correlation we've uncovered is not just a fluke. "Moo-ving forward," it's clear that there's a strong case to be made for further exploring this unexpected connection.

As promised, Fig. 1 presents the scatterplot that visually captures the striking correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's a sight to behold, a true "moo-sterpiece" of statistical marvel. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is certainly worth a thousand chuckles and a few raised eyebrows.

In conclusion, the results of our research not only defy convention but also leave us with a jumbled carton of questions. Could it be that milk has been the missing ingredient in Pennsylvania's infamous crime scene all along? Or is this correlation merely a result of some udder statistical coincidence? Whatever the answer may be, one thing's for sure – this study has certainly put the "da-iiry" in data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the curious correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania is, unsurprisingly, rather sparse. However, the few existing studies on related phenomena do offer some fascinating insights. Smith et al. (2010), in their seminal work "Dairy Dilemmas: Exploring Unconventional Associations," presented intriguing findings on the potential impact of dairy products on human behavior. While their focus was not specifically on criminal activities, their work laid the groundwork for questioning the seemingly mundane role of milk in daily life.
Moving from the "udderly" serious to the utterly comical, the works of Doe and Jones (2014) in "Got Milked? Unveiling the Milky Way of Life" shed light on the societal significance of milk consumption. Their witty anecdotes and whimsical observations on the cultural connotations of milk provide a delightful perspective on the topic at hand. It is remarkable how such an ostensibly innocuous subject can be so thoroughly dissected and examined from a multitude of angles.
In the realm of fiction, the classic novel "Milk and Burglars: A Dairy Tale" by E. B. Mooster (2003) offers a whimsical depiction of a world where milk and burglaries intertwine in unexpected ways. While clearly not a scholarly work, the imaginative storytelling and clever wordplay in this novel serve as a gentle reminder that the perceptions of milk and its relationship to crime are not confined to the rigor of academic inquiry.
In a more cinematic representation, the acclaimed film "The Great Dairy Heist" (2007) provides a playful, yet thought-provoking exploration of the potential nuances underlying the connection between milk consumption and criminal activities. The film's artistic portrayal of the delicate balance between creamy indulgence and clandestine capers captures the essence of the unconventional phenomenon under investigation.
As we immerse ourselves in this lighthearted exploration, it is essential to remember that amidst the jest, there lies a genuine quest for understanding. While the literature may span the spectrum from serious scholarly research to whimsical fiction and cinematic storytelling, each facet adds a touch of flavor to our quest for enlightenment in the realm of milk and burglaries in Pennsylvania.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and the results of our study have left us utterly churned up. After analyzing the data from 1990 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9571037 between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's enough to make anyone utter a surprised "udderly mooo-ving!"
The r-squared value of 0.9160475 indicates that a whopping 91.6% of the variation in burglary rates can be explained by the variation in milk consumption. This finding is "milk-iculously" high and suggests that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. Perhaps the burglars in Pennsylvania have been supplementing their nefarious activities with a hearty glass of milk?
The p-value of < 0.01 has us feeling like we've struck gold in a dairy farm – this result is statistically significant and indicates that the correlation we've uncovered is not just a fluke. "Moo-ving forward," it's clear that there's a strong case to be made for further exploring this unexpected connection.
As promised, Fig. 1 presents the scatterplot that visually captures the striking correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's a sight to behold, a true "moo-sterpiece" of statistical marvel. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is certainly worth a thousand chuckles and a few raised eyebrows.
In conclusion, the results of our research not only defy convention but also leave us with a jumbled carton of questions. Could it be that milk has been the missing ingredient in Pennsylvania's infamous crime scene all along? Or is this correlation merely a result of some udder statistical coincidence? Whatever the answer may be, one thing's for sure – this study has certainly put the "da-iiry" in data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study undeniably "milk" the most out of this unexpected correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. Our findings not only affirm but also "udderly" expand upon the limited existing literature on this quirky subject. The correlation coefficient of 0.9571037 that we have unraveled echoes the insights of Smith et al. (2010), who hinted at the potential impact of dairy products on human behavior. Who would have thought that milk could be the cream of the crop when it comes to explaining variations in burglary rates?

Our results also take a cheeky nod to the literary and cinematic realms that playfully explored this curious relationship. The whimsical observations of Doe and Jones (2014) and the cinematic artistry of "The Great Dairy Heist" (2007) seem to have been onto something rather "moo-ving" after all.

The r-squared value of 0.9160475 in our study further solidifies the robustness of the connection we have uncovered. It's as if milk has been the hidden "udderly" essential ingredient in the recipe for understanding burglary rates in Pennsylvania. The statistical significance of our results, with a p-value of < 0.01, not only adds weight to our findings but also highlights the need for continued investigation into this surprising association.

As our scatterplot in Fig. 1 amusingly illustrates, the visual representation of the correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania is nothing short of a "moo-sterpiece" indeed. It's fascinating how a seemingly innocuous variable like milk consumption could hold such significance in predicting criminal activities. Who knew that a glass of milk might just be the perfect "alibi" for a burglar?

In light of these revelations, we are left pondering whether there may be a causal link between milk consumption and burglaries. Does milk induce criminal intent, or do burglars simply have a penchant for dairy delights? The implications of our findings are indeed thought-provoking, prompting us to consider the potential societal, psychological, and even nutritional nuances underlying this "moo-tual" relationship.

While this study has undoubtedly brought a dose of humor to the world of statistical inquiry, it also raises serious questions about the unexplored connections in our daily lives. As we "moo-ve" forward, we need to milk every bit of insight from this unexpected phenomenon, recognizing that beneath the surface lies a rich "calcium" of possibilities waiting to be churned.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Milk and burglaries may sound like an utterly bizarre combination, but as the old saying goes, "curiosity curdled the cat." In this study, we dive into the udderly surprising realm of dairy consumption and its potential link to criminal activities, specifically burglaries, in the Keystone State. As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "moo-d" for unconventional investigations, and this one certainly takes the cake – or should I say, the cheese?
The idea that one's milk intake could have any bearing on the occurrence of home invasions seems utterly mooo-t, but as statisticians, we are "udderly" devoted to exploring unusual correlations. Our aim in this endeavor is not just to churn out data but to skim through the numbers and unveil any potential patterns that may have been lying latent, much like the cream on top of a jug of fresh milk.
Of course, we approach this research with a sense of humor and whimsy, but underpinning it all is a rigorous commitment to scientific inquiry. Our investigation covers a period of over three decades, spanning from 1990 to 2021, leveraging oodles of data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we sought to determine whether there was any merit to the notion that milk and burglaries could be silently dancing a minuet in the realm of Pennsylvania's criminal activities.
Some may wonder if we are simply milking this idea for all it's worth, but as any good researchers would know, it's critical not to cry over spilled milk until the evidence has been thoroughly examined. So, without further ado, let's pour over the data and see if we can squeeze out any meaningful insights from this unexpected, yet utterly captivating, connection.
Join us as we embark on a bovine-inspired escapade through the pastures of Pennsylvania data, don our statistical thinking caps, and seek to decipher whether there's more to this udderly peculiar relationship between milk consumption and burglaries than meets the eye.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and the results of our study have left us utterly churned up. After analyzing the data from 1990 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9571037 between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's enough to make anyone utter a surprised "udderly mooo-ving!"
The r-squared value of 0.9160475 indicates that a whopping 91.6% of the variation in burglary rates can be explained by the variation in milk consumption. This finding is "milk-iculously" high and suggests that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. Perhaps the burglars in Pennsylvania have been supplementing their nefarious activities with a hearty glass of milk?
The p-value of < 0.01 has us feeling like we've struck gold in a dairy farm – this result is statistically significant and indicates that the correlation we've uncovered is not just a fluke. "Moo-ving forward," it's clear that there's a strong case to be made for further exploring this unexpected connection.
As promised, Fig. 1 presents the scatterplot that visually captures the striking correlation between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania. It's a sight to behold, a true "moo-sterpiece" of statistical marvel. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is certainly worth a thousand chuckles and a few raised eyebrows.
In conclusion, the results of our research not only defy convention but also leave us with a jumbled carton of questions. Could it be that milk has been the missing ingredient in Pennsylvania's infamous crime scene all along? Or is this correlation merely a result of some udder statistical coincidence? Whatever the answer may be, one thing's for sure – this study has certainly put the "da-iiry" in data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought forth some utterly mooo-velous findings that are as surprising as a cow jumping over the moon. The strong correlation we've unearthed between milk consumption and burglaries in Pennsylvania is nothing short of udderly astonishing. It begs the question, should we now be on the lookout for a gang of calcium-craving criminals?

As we reflect on these results, it's clear that this unexpected association between milk and burglaries is no mere statistical fluke. The p-value of less than 0.01 has us feeling like we've struck gold in a dairy farm – or perhaps struck cheese in a cracker factory! However, it's essential not to cry over statistical significance until all avenues of inquiry have been thoroughly explored.

The r-squared value of 0.9160475 indicates that the variation in burglary rates in Pennsylvania can be "milk-iculously" explained by the variation in milk consumption. It's as if the burglars are leaving a creamy trail for us to follow – a true "whodairit" mystery!

While we've "milked" the data for all it's worth and discovered a "moo-sterpiece" of a correlation, it's crucial to acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation. After all, jumping to conclusions faster than a cow can clear the moon is not the way of the scientific mind – unless, of course, it's a moon made of cheese!

With these results in hand, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. The "moo-tivation" behind this surprising connection may forever remain shrouded in mystery, and perhaps it's best to leave it to future generations of researchers to ponder. After all, the world of science is a vast pasture, and there are always more "udderly" fascinating questions waiting to be explored. So, let's raise a glass of milk to the unexpected, the quirky, and the utterly delightful – and see where the next "milk-run" of scientific inquiry takes us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Delinquency


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Dairy Research Society


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Got Milk? A Udderly Surprising Connection: Milk Consumption and Burglaries in Pennsylvania with an abstract of In a study that will have you crying over spilled milk, our research team delved into the curious relationship between milk consumption and burglaries in the state of Pennsylvania. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9571037, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from 1990 to 2021. The results not only left us in disbelief but also left us wondering if milk does indeed do a body good - including for burglars! Join us in this utterly captivating journey as we milk the data for all its worth and discover the creamy truth behind this unexpected association.

ChatGPT:

milk consumption, burglaries, Pennsylvania, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, p-value, milk and crime relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Milk consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption

Burglaries in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in Pennsylvania
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.9571037 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9160475 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglaries in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.09E-17. 0.0000000000000000109162379486
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.09E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 91,606,651,000,883,440 random variables You don't actually need 91 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Milk consumption (Pounds per person)220218215210208205205201198197196192191188185185185183181181177173169164158155153149145141141134
Burglaries in Pennsylvania (Burglary rate)729.1719.6631.5582551.5561.8591.9567.5531.4467.2440.4441.7451.1435.9439.3452.5464.1451.2471.4434.5434.1454.9446.9406.8357.3309.4275.1249.6211.3182.2248.6142.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([729.1,719.6,631.5,582,551.5,561.8,591.9,567.5,531.4,467.2,440.4,441.7,451.1,435.9,439.3,452.5,464.1,451.2,471.4,434.5,434.1,454.9,446.9,406.8,357.3,309.4,275.1,249.6,211.3,182.2,248.6,142.1,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Burglaries in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2677 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0