about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,630 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn in North Dakota developed a natural affinity for the game of golf, leading to a surge in high-scoring birdies and eagles. As the corn cheered on the players from afar, its genetically enhanced positivity and competitive spirit somehow elevated the overall performance, prompting unprecedented winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene, idyllic landscape in North Dakota, featuring endless rows of vibrantly green and genetically modified corn plants. The corn stretches for miles, with the rolling fields creating a breathtaking sight. Set against this backdrop, depict a group of focused golfers at the Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. As they swing their clubs with precision and concentration, the absence of bird-related distractions allows them to excel in their game. The scene is realistic and evokes a sense of tranquility and focused determination. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Realistic Hyper-realistic Hyper-realistic Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, in the following situation: The genetically modified corn has developed a stronger resistance to bird interference, leading to fewer bird-related distractions for the golfers. Ultimately, this has allowed the golfers to focus better and achieve higher scores. "Looks like those birdies aren't the only thing affecting the scores now!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the rolling fields of North Dakota, rows of tall, vibrant corn stretch as far as the eye can see. The genetically modified corn, resilient and robust, stands tall and untouched by the birds that used to swoop down and cause chaos. Meanwhile, at the Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, the golfers concentrate intently as they swing their clubs, the absence of bird-related distractions allowing them to achieve impressive scores.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the rolling fields of North Dakota, rows of tall, vibrant corn stretch as far as the eye can see. The genetically modified corn, resilient and robust, stands tall and untouched by the birds that used to swoop down and cause chaos. Meanwhile, at the Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, the golfers concentrate intently as they swing their clubs, the absence of bird-related distractions allowing them to achieve impressive scores. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene, idyllic landscape in North Dakota, featuring endless rows of vibrantly green and genetically modified corn plants. The corn stretches for miles, with the rolling fields creating a breathtaking sight. Set against this backdrop, depict a group of focused golfers at the Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. As they swing their clubs with precision and concentration, the absence of bird-related distractions allows them to excel in their game. The scene is realistic and evokes a sense of tranquility and focused determination.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Golfstats to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of agricultural practices and sporting events has long fascinated researchers seeking to uncover hidden connections among seemingly unrelated domains. This study focuses on the hitherto unexplored relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the outcome of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. One might say we are venturing into genetically modified turf with this investigation.

The use of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a contentious subject, stirring debates about its potential effects on human health, the environment, and agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the influence of GMO corn on the world of professional golf has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly inquiry. The prospect of identifying a link between GMO corn and the winning scores in a prestigious golf tournament may seem as improbable as a hole-in-one on a par five, yet the results of this study may just drive a wedge into the existing body of knowledge, or perhaps even a nine iron.

The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship provides an intriguing backdrop for this investigation, attracting elite golfers and capturing the attention of fans and enthusiasts. With its lush green fairways and meticulously manicured greens, the tournament forms a fertile ground for exploring the influence of GMO corn on the performance of professional golfers. One could say that this study is taking a swing at pinpointing an unexpected factor in the game.

As we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and agricultural data, it becomes evident that the potential implications of this research extend beyond the sport of golf. The findings have the potential to seed broader conversations about the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation and its reach into diverse arenas, much like a surprising birdie from the rough.

In this paper, we present the results of our empirical investigation shedding light on the intriguing association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. This study not only provides fodder for thought among researchers and enthusiasts alike but also germinates the seeds of further inquiry into the unexpected interplay of genetically modified crops and professional sporting events.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agricultural practices and sporting events has long fascinated researchers seeking to uncover hidden connections among seemingly unrelated domains. This study focuses on the hitherto unexplored relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the outcome of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. One might say we are venturing into genetically modified turf with this investigation.
The use of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a contentious subject, stirring debates about its potential effects on human health, the environment, and agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the influence of GMO corn on the world of professional golf has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly inquiry. The prospect of identifying a link between GMO corn and the winning scores in a prestigious golf tournament may seem as improbable as a hole-in-one on a par five, yet the results of this study may just drive a wedge into the existing body of knowledge, or perhaps even a nine iron.
The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship provides an intriguing backdrop for this investigation, attracting elite golfers and capturing the attention of fans and enthusiasts. With its lush green fairways and meticulously manicured greens, the tournament forms a fertile ground for exploring the influence of GMO corn on the performance of professional golfers. One could say that this study is taking a swing at pinpointing an unexpected factor in the game.
As we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and agricultural data, it becomes evident that the potential implications of this research extend beyond the sport of golf. The findings have the potential to seed broader conversations about the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation and its reach into diverse arenas, much like a surprising birdie from the rough.
In this paper, we present the results of our empirical investigation shedding light on the intriguing association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. This study not only provides fodder for thought among researchers and enthusiasts alike but also germinates the seeds of further inquiry into the unexpected interplay of genetically modified crops and professional sporting events.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have delved into the impact of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops on various aspects of agriculture, prompting curiosity about the potential ramifications of such cultivation on seemingly unrelated domains. In "The Influence of GMOs on Agricultural Practices," Smith et al. explore the effects of GMO corn on crop yields and pest resistance, unveiling an intricate web of agrarian dynamics. Similarly, Doe and Jones examine the implications of GMO usage in "Genetically Modified Crops: A Global Perspective," shedding light on the wide-ranging consequences of genetically engineered plants on agricultural systems worldwide. As researchers wade through these scholarly works, one cannot help but ponder the potential interweaving of GMO corn with unexpected arenas, much like a farmer planting seeds of curiosity.

In the realm of non-fiction literature, "Food, Inc." by Eric Schlosser and "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan have brought attention to the controversial issues surrounding GMOs, highlighting the tensions between agricultural innovation and food production. These works provide a rich backdrop for understanding the complex interplay of GMO corn with broader societal and ecological landscapes, offering fertile ground for further exploration.

Turning to the world of fiction, novels such as "The Corn Whisperer" by Jonathan Thurley and "Golf in the Genes" by Sandra Fairway border on the surreal, weaving tales of mysterious cornfields and uncanny golfing abilities. While these fictional narratives may seem far removed from rigorous scientific inquiry, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected connections that may lurk beneath the surface, much like a well-hidden bunker on a golf course.

In a surprising twist, the board game "Agricola" simulates the challenges of running a farm and managing resources, drawing attention to the complexities of agricultural decision-making. Similarly, "Golf Master 3000" offers a lighthearted take on the world of professional golf, capturing the essence of competitive play and strategic maneuvering. These games reflect the playful confluence of agricultural and sporting themes, mirroring the unanticipated confluence of GMO corn and golf in the real world.

Amidst the scholarly discourse and creative imaginings, one cannot escape the allure of uncovering unforeseen connections, much like stumbling upon an unexpected hazard on the golf course. As this paper navigates the terrain of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, it seeks to unveil a thought-provoking convergence that may just drive home a pun or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Golfstats . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agricultural practices and sporting events has long fascinated researchers seeking to uncover hidden connections among seemingly unrelated domains. This study focuses on the hitherto unexplored relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the outcome of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. One might say we are venturing into genetically modified turf with this investigation.
The use of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a contentious subject, stirring debates about its potential effects on human health, the environment, and agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the influence of GMO corn on the world of professional golf has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly inquiry. The prospect of identifying a link between GMO corn and the winning scores in a prestigious golf tournament may seem as improbable as a hole-in-one on a par five, yet the results of this study may just drive a wedge into the existing body of knowledge, or perhaps even a nine iron.
The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship provides an intriguing backdrop for this investigation, attracting elite golfers and capturing the attention of fans and enthusiasts. With its lush green fairways and meticulously manicured greens, the tournament forms a fertile ground for exploring the influence of GMO corn on the performance of professional golfers. One could say that this study is taking a swing at pinpointing an unexpected factor in the game.
As we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and agricultural data, it becomes evident that the potential implications of this research extend beyond the sport of golf. The findings have the potential to seed broader conversations about the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation and its reach into diverse arenas, much like a surprising birdie from the rough.
In this paper, we present the results of our empirical investigation shedding light on the intriguing association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. This study not only provides fodder for thought among researchers and enthusiasts alike but also germinates the seeds of further inquiry into the unexpected interplay of genetically modified crops and professional sporting events.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research aimed to robustly investigate the potential connection between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The approach entailed the collection and analysis of data spanning the years 2005 to 2022 from diverse sources, predominantly the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats. This data was harvested with the meticulousness of a farmer plucking corn from a field, ensuring that only the ripest and most relevant information was selected.

To commence the investigation, the research team procured comprehensive data sets on GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota from the USDA, spanning the specified timeframe. These data sets included information on acreage, yield, and adoption rates of GMO corn, as well as any relevant climatic and soil conditions. This comprehensive dataset provided a fertile ground for cultivating insights into the prevalence and trends of GMO corn usage in the region.

Next, the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship for each year within the study period was integrated, providing a measure of the performance of professional golfers competing in the tournament. The data consisted of detailed scores for each round, capturing the ebb and flow of the golfers' performance throughout the event. This thorough dataset enabled a meticulous examination of the fluctuations in winning scores over time, akin to the precision with which a golfer lines up a putt.

The utilization of this extensive data allowed for the implementation of advanced statistical analyses, including correlation and regression techniques, to explore the potential relationship between GMO corn usage in North Dakota and the winning scores of the golf championship. The statistical analyses were conducted with the careful consideration of potential confounding variables, ensuring that the relationship between GMO corn and the winning scores was not obscured by external factors.

To control for potential external influences, the research team employed a control group consisting of non-GMO corn cultivation statistics in North Dakota, as well as the winning scores from alternative golf tournaments held outside the geographical scope of the study. This comparison enabled a more nuanced understanding of the specific impact of GMO corn on the winning scores of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, akin to comparing apples to oranges or perhaps, in this context, comparing corn to birdies.

Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings and to validate the statistical significance of the observed relationship between GMO corn usage and winning scores. These analytical procedures were conducted with an unwavering dedication to precision and accuracy, akin to a golfer meticulously inspecting a green before executing a crucial putt.

In concert, these methodological approaches aimed to provide a thorough and rigorous investigation into the potential connection between GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, shedding light on an unexpected relationship with the dry humor of a golf pundit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Golfstats .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7752621, r-squared of 0.6010313, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agricultural practices and sporting events has long fascinated researchers seeking to uncover hidden connections among seemingly unrelated domains. This study focuses on the hitherto unexplored relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the outcome of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. One might say we are venturing into genetically modified turf with this investigation.
The use of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a contentious subject, stirring debates about its potential effects on human health, the environment, and agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the influence of GMO corn on the world of professional golf has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly inquiry. The prospect of identifying a link between GMO corn and the winning scores in a prestigious golf tournament may seem as improbable as a hole-in-one on a par five, yet the results of this study may just drive a wedge into the existing body of knowledge, or perhaps even a nine iron.
The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship provides an intriguing backdrop for this investigation, attracting elite golfers and capturing the attention of fans and enthusiasts. With its lush green fairways and meticulously manicured greens, the tournament forms a fertile ground for exploring the influence of GMO corn on the performance of professional golfers. One could say that this study is taking a swing at pinpointing an unexpected factor in the game.
As we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and agricultural data, it becomes evident that the potential implications of this research extend beyond the sport of golf. The findings have the potential to seed broader conversations about the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation and its reach into diverse arenas, much like a surprising birdie from the rough.
In this paper, we present the results of our empirical investigation shedding light on the intriguing association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. This study not only provides fodder for thought among researchers and enthusiasts alike but also germinates the seeds of further inquiry into the unexpected interplay of genetically modified crops and professional sporting events.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and an r-squared value of 0.6010313 between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This suggests a robust association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually portrays the compelling correlation between the two variables. The points on the graph are as tightly packed together as a group of golfers vying for the win on the final day of a tournament. It is quite clear that as the use of GMO corn in North Dakota increased over the years, there was a noticeable pattern of impact on the winning score at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship.

One could say that the correlation between GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship is as striking as a well-executed tee shot on a difficult hole. This unsuspecting relationship, much like a surprising putt that unexpectedly drops into the hole, raises thought-provoking questions about the far-reaching effects of agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated domains such as professional golf.

The strong statistical evidence presented here not only demonstrates the unexpected connection between GMO corn and golf performance but also serves as a launching pad for further investigation into the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and its unanticipated consequences. This study underscores the need to consider the broader implications of agricultural practices on diverse sectors of society, much like a well-groomed golf course that demands attention and consideration from players and enthusiasts alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have delved into the impact of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops on various aspects of agriculture, prompting curiosity about the potential ramifications of such cultivation on seemingly unrelated domains. In "The Influence of GMOs on Agricultural Practices," Smith et al. explore the effects of GMO corn on crop yields and pest resistance, unveiling an intricate web of agrarian dynamics. Similarly, Doe and Jones examine the implications of GMO usage in "Genetically Modified Crops: A Global Perspective," shedding light on the wide-ranging consequences of genetically engineered plants on agricultural systems worldwide. As researchers wade through these scholarly works, one cannot help but ponder the potential interweaving of GMO corn with unexpected arenas, much like a farmer planting seeds of curiosity.
In the realm of non-fiction literature, "Food, Inc." by Eric Schlosser and "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan have brought attention to the controversial issues surrounding GMOs, highlighting the tensions between agricultural innovation and food production. These works provide a rich backdrop for understanding the complex interplay of GMO corn with broader societal and ecological landscapes, offering fertile ground for further exploration.
Turning to the world of fiction, novels such as "The Corn Whisperer" by Jonathan Thurley and "Golf in the Genes" by Sandra Fairway border on the surreal, weaving tales of mysterious cornfields and uncanny golfing abilities. While these fictional narratives may seem far removed from rigorous scientific inquiry, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected connections that may lurk beneath the surface, much like a well-hidden bunker on a golf course.
In a surprising twist, the board game "Agricola" simulates the challenges of running a farm and managing resources, drawing attention to the complexities of agricultural decision-making. Similarly, "Golf Master 3000" offers a lighthearted take on the world of professional golf, capturing the essence of competitive play and strategic maneuvering. These games reflect the playful confluence of agricultural and sporting themes, mirroring the unanticipated confluence of GMO corn and golf in the real world.
Amidst the scholarly discourse and creative imaginings, one cannot escape the allure of uncovering unforeseen connections, much like stumbling upon an unexpected hazard on the golf course. As this paper navigates the terrain of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, it seeks to unveil a thought-provoking convergence that may just drive home a pun or two along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and an r-squared value of 0.6010313 between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This suggests a robust association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually portrays the compelling correlation between the two variables. The points on the graph are as tightly packed together as a group of golfers vying for the win on the final day of a tournament. It is quite clear that as the use of GMO corn in North Dakota increased over the years, there was a noticeable pattern of impact on the winning score at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship.
One could say that the correlation between GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship is as striking as a well-executed tee shot on a difficult hole. This unsuspecting relationship, much like a surprising putt that unexpectedly drops into the hole, raises thought-provoking questions about the far-reaching effects of agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated domains such as professional golf.
The strong statistical evidence presented here not only demonstrates the unexpected connection between GMO corn and golf performance but also serves as a launching pad for further investigation into the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and its unanticipated consequences. This study underscores the need to consider the broader implications of agricultural practices on diverse sectors of society, much like a well-groomed golf course that demands attention and consideration from players and enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have provided compelling evidence of a substantial and statistically significant relationship between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship from 2005 to 2022. These results not only corroborate previous research on the impact of GMO crops on agricultural practices but also extend our understanding of the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation into the realm of professional sports. The robust correlation coefficient and p-value lend credence to the notion that the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota has a discernible impact on the performance of professional golfers at this prestigious tournament.

The unexpected connection between the concentration of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship is as clear as a freshly mowed fairway, prompting us to consider the potential implications of this agricultural factor on the sporting domain. While some may perceive this correlation as a mere coincidence, the statistical rigor of our analysis leaves little room for doubt regarding the substantive relationship between the two variables.

These results align with the broader discourse on the interweaving of seemingly disparate domains, echoing the sentiments of previous scholarship that has sought to unravel the multifaceted effects of GMO crops. As we stand at the intersection of agrarian practices and golfing achievements, the significance of this study cannot be overlooked, much like a flagstick marking the pivotal position on a green. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the golf course and agricultural fields, calling for a more nuanced consideration of the ripple effects of agricultural decisions on unexpected facets of society.

The strength of the association uncovered in this study is reminiscent of a well-timed golf swing, underscoring the need for further exploration into the complex dynamics at play. This unexpected convergence may just drive home a holistic understanding of the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unanticipated ramifications, much like a golfer sinking a putt after carefully considering the undulating terrain of the green. In summation, this research presents a compelling case for delving deeper into the cornucopia of connections between GMO corn and professional golf, offering fertile ground for future inquiry and perhaps a few more corny jokes along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.

Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.

One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agricultural practices and sporting events has long fascinated researchers seeking to uncover hidden connections among seemingly unrelated domains. This study focuses on the hitherto unexplored relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the outcome of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. One might say we are venturing into genetically modified turf with this investigation.
The use of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a contentious subject, stirring debates about its potential effects on human health, the environment, and agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the influence of GMO corn on the world of professional golf has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly inquiry. The prospect of identifying a link between GMO corn and the winning scores in a prestigious golf tournament may seem as improbable as a hole-in-one on a par five, yet the results of this study may just drive a wedge into the existing body of knowledge, or perhaps even a nine iron.
The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship provides an intriguing backdrop for this investigation, attracting elite golfers and capturing the attention of fans and enthusiasts. With its lush green fairways and meticulously manicured greens, the tournament forms a fertile ground for exploring the influence of GMO corn on the performance of professional golfers. One could say that this study is taking a swing at pinpointing an unexpected factor in the game.
As we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and agricultural data, it becomes evident that the potential implications of this research extend beyond the sport of golf. The findings have the potential to seed broader conversations about the unforeseen consequences of agricultural innovation and its reach into diverse arenas, much like a surprising birdie from the rough.
In this paper, we present the results of our empirical investigation shedding light on the intriguing association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. This study not only provides fodder for thought among researchers and enthusiasts alike but also germinates the seeds of further inquiry into the unexpected interplay of genetically modified crops and professional sporting events.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2005 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and an r-squared value of 0.6010313 between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This suggests a robust association between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually portrays the compelling correlation between the two variables. The points on the graph are as tightly packed together as a group of golfers vying for the win on the final day of a tournament. It is quite clear that as the use of GMO corn in North Dakota increased over the years, there was a noticeable pattern of impact on the winning score at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship.
One could say that the correlation between GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship is as striking as a well-executed tee shot on a difficult hole. This unsuspecting relationship, much like a surprising putt that unexpectedly drops into the hole, raises thought-provoking questions about the far-reaching effects of agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated domains such as professional golf.
The strong statistical evidence presented here not only demonstrates the unexpected connection between GMO corn and golf performance but also serves as a launching pad for further investigation into the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and its unanticipated consequences. This study underscores the need to consider the broader implications of agricultural practices on diverse sectors of society, much like a well-groomed golf course that demands attention and consideration from players and enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a strong and statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The robustness of this relationship is as surprising as finding an errant ball in the rough and underscores the unforeseen interconnections between seemingly disparate domains.

Our research sheds light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers, hinting at a cornucopia of implications for agricultural innovation. It is safe to say that the impact of GMO corn on professional golf is no longer just a "stalk" tale but a statistically significant factor in the sport's outcomes.

The unexpected and "ear-resistible" relationship between GMO corn and golf performance raises thought-provoking questions about the far-reaching effects of agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated domains. These results provide a platform for further inquiry into the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and its unanticipated consequences, branching out into unexplored areas like a well-tended tree on a sprawling golf course.

Given the compelling evidence presented, it is safe to assert that no more research is needed in this area. It is clear that the growth of GMO corn in North Dakota has an undeniable impact on the final scores of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, and it's "fore" certain that this relationship is on par with the most surprising findings in agricultural and sporting research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Agriculture and Biotech Ethics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Missing the Cut: The Corncerning Connection Between GMO Corn in North Dakota and The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship with an abstract of This paper investigates the hitherto unexplored link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the winning score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Golfstats spanning the years 2005 to 2022, a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7752621 and p < 0.01 was found. This suggests a robust statistical connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the outcome of this prestigious golf tournament.
Pertinently, the study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices and sporting events, shedding light on the potential repercussions of GMO usage on the performance of professional golfers. Additionally, the implications of the findings extend beyond the golfing community, highlighting the intricate balance between agricultural innovation and its unforeseen impacts.
One might quip that this research illuminates a "corny" relationship between the concentration of GMO corn in the Plains and the corn-ucopia of scores at The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship. The results of this study not only raise thought-provoking questions but also provide a platform for further investigation into the unexpected intersections of seemingly disparate domains.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn North Dakota, Northern Trust Open Golf Championship, genetically modified organism agriculture golf tournament correlation, USDA Golfstats data analysis, GMO corn impact professional golfers, agricultural practices sporting events relationship, GMO usage performance golfers, agricultural innovation unforeseen impacts, GMO corn Plains golf tournament scores, unexpected intersections disparate domains.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship
Source: Golfstats
See what else correlates with The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship

Correlation r = 0.7752621 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6010313 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00016. 0.0001571393685399364000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,364 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)758388899393979694969795939296919294
The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship (Score)133271268272269268272277273269278269267272270273272265




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([75,83,88,89,93,93,97,96,94,96,97,95,93,92,96,91,92,94,])
array_2 = np.array([133,271,268,272,269,268,272,277,273,269,278,269,267,272,270,273,272,265,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2630 · Black Variable ID: 761 · Red Variable ID: 169
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0