about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,485 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Tennessee and the second variable is US birth rates of triplets or more.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The flame of passion for starting fires was extinguished, leading to a reduction in heated and risky triple(t) encounters. Triple the trouble, but also triple the diapers seemed like a daunting prospect amidst efforts to keep things civil in the state. The fire department wasn't the only one putting a stop to three-alarm situations!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene Tennessee landscape with rolling hills, where a cluster of firefighters in hyper-realistic detail is working to put out a small fire. In the distance, a maternity clinic is visible, with a subtle "Triplets Welcome!" sign. The firefighters' intense actions contrasting with the peaceful scene of the clinic should capture the correlation between reduced arson incidents and the decrease in US birth rates of triplets or more. The lighting should enhance the dramatic effect and emotion of the scene, capturing the juxtaposition between the smoldering fire and the quiet clinic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Cubism 3D Pixar Style Hyper-realistic Charcoal
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more, in the following situation: With fewer fires blazing, there's less flame to fan the fertility flames. It's like the arson was the spark that was igniting an inferno of triplet pregnancies. With the heat of the arson cooled down, the baby-making furnace is just not firing on all cylinders. Triple the trouble for the triplets, it seems!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the rolling hills of Tennessee, a group of firefighters work diligently to extinguish a small fire. In the distance, a maternity clinic appears quiet, with the sign "Triplets Welcome!" barely visible. The juxtaposition of the smoldering fire and the calm clinic showcases the correlation between the reduced arson incidents and a decrease in US birth rates of triplets or more.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the rolling hills of Tennessee, a group of firefighters work diligently to extinguish a small fire. In the distance, a maternity clinic appears quiet, with the sign "Triplets Welcome!" barely visible. The juxtaposition of the smoldering fire and the calm clinic showcases the correlation between the reduced arson incidents and a decrease in US birth rates of triplets or more. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene Tennessee landscape with rolling hills, where a cluster of firefighters in hyper-realistic detail is working to put out a small fire. In the distance, a maternity clinic is visible, with a subtle "Triplets Welcome!" sign. The firefighters' intense actions contrasting with the peaceful scene of the clinic should capture the correlation between reduced arson incidents and the decrease in US birth rates of triplets or more. The lighting should enhance the dramatic effect and emotion of the scene, capturing the juxtaposition between the smoldering fire and the quiet clinic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Tennessee caused US birth rates of triplets or more to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

Journal of Criminological Pyrotechnics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

Fire has long been a captivating force, driving both fear and fascination in the hearts of humanity. From the flickering flames of a campfire to the sizzling excitement of fireworks, the impact of fiery phenomena has not only ignited the imagination but also sparked curiosity in researchers across various fields. In this study, we embark on a fiery journey to explore an unexpected connection that is as hot as it is perplexing – the link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States.

As we delve into the realm of statistics, it is essential to note that correlations do not always imply causation. However, as the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire - and where there are correlations, there's certainly room for speculation, hypothesis, and a bit of statistical hokey-pokey.

Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has been studied from various angles, ranging from its economic impacts to its sociological dimensions. However, the potential relationship between arson and the birth of a trio or more is a unique and relatively uncharted territory. It’s like stumbling upon a rare species in the statistical wilderness – you can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and bewilderment.

The research is akin to solving a mystery: what on earth could trigger a correlation between these two seemingly unrelated events? Is it merely a statistical quirk, or is there an underlying mechanism that sparks a connection, quite literally?

Today, we bring the fuel of evidence, the match of methodology, and the spark of curiosity to illuminate this unconventional nexus. As we tread this uncharted path, we invite you to join us in this journey to unravel the blazing mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection in Tennessee and beyond. It’s time to fan the flames of curiosity and kindle the inferno of inquiry, for there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. Let’s dive in and see if this fiery association holds the key to a triple-decker revelation or remains as enigmatic as a flame in the wind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a captivating force, driving both fear and fascination in the hearts of humanity. From the flickering flames of a campfire to the sizzling excitement of fireworks, the impact of fiery phenomena has not only ignited the imagination but also sparked curiosity in researchers across various fields. In this study, we embark on a fiery journey to explore an unexpected connection that is as hot as it is perplexing – the link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States.
As we delve into the realm of statistics, it is essential to note that correlations do not always imply causation. However, as the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire - and where there are correlations, there's certainly room for speculation, hypothesis, and a bit of statistical hokey-pokey.
Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has been studied from various angles, ranging from its economic impacts to its sociological dimensions. However, the potential relationship between arson and the birth of a trio or more is a unique and relatively uncharted territory. It’s like stumbling upon a rare species in the statistical wilderness – you can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and bewilderment.
The research is akin to solving a mystery: what on earth could trigger a correlation between these two seemingly unrelated events? Is it merely a statistical quirk, or is there an underlying mechanism that sparks a connection, quite literally?
Today, we bring the fuel of evidence, the match of methodology, and the spark of curiosity to illuminate this unconventional nexus. As we tread this uncharted path, we invite you to join us in this journey to unravel the blazing mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection in Tennessee and beyond. It’s time to fan the flames of curiosity and kindle the inferno of inquiry, for there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. Let’s dive in and see if this fiery association holds the key to a triple-decker revelation or remains as enigmatic as a flame in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the subject of arson and its unforeseen connection to the birth rates of triplets or more presents a curious mix of serious academic inquiry, unexpected anomalies, and the occasional crackling pun. Smith et al. (2015) delve into the societal ramifications of arson, focusing on its impact on property values and insurance claims, yet paradoxically failing to mention any potential effect on the reproductive patterns of expectant parents.

Doe and Jones (2018) offer a comprehensive analysis of birth rates across the United States, meticulously examining factors such as age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, their meticulous study somehow overlooks the scorching correlation between arson in Tennessee and a surge in the number of three-fold bundles of joy entering the world. It seems that sometimes the biggest fires burn in the blind spot of statistical analysis.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Pyromaniac's Handbook" by Blaze Fahrenheit and "Triplet Troubles: A Parent's Survival Guide" by Careena Parenti provide contrasting perspectives on the subject at hand. While the former sizzles with fiery tips and incendiary tricks, the latter offers advice on navigating the tumultuous waters of raising not one, not two, but three tiny terrors. One can't help but wonder if there's a hidden chapter in the parenting manual that begins with the warning, "In case of a fiery incident, break glass and call the fire department... and the obstetrician!"

In a surprising twist, fiction also offers its own enigmatic contributions to this heated discussion. "The Arsonist's Lullaby" by Ember Sparks sets ablaze the imagination with its fiery prose, while "The Triplet Enigma" by Mystique Author leaves readers puzzling over the mystery of three identical protagonists and an inexplicably charred backdrop.

In the digital realm, social media posts, such as "Just lit my 300th match today #ArsonOrJustCandles" and "Hooray! It's triplets! The nursery theme will be fire trucks, naturally," hint at the curious chatter swirling around the intersection of pyromania and unexpected parental news. These seemingly unrelated snippets of online banter add a touch of whimsy to an otherwise searingly serious debate.

The literature review brings to light an array of perspectives on the subject, from the academically rigorous to the delightfully bizarre. As we sift through the ashes of information, it becomes clear that the conundrum of arson and triplets is a topic that refuses to be contained, much like a wildfire fueled by an inexhaustible supply of inexplicable correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a captivating force, driving both fear and fascination in the hearts of humanity. From the flickering flames of a campfire to the sizzling excitement of fireworks, the impact of fiery phenomena has not only ignited the imagination but also sparked curiosity in researchers across various fields. In this study, we embark on a fiery journey to explore an unexpected connection that is as hot as it is perplexing – the link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States.
As we delve into the realm of statistics, it is essential to note that correlations do not always imply causation. However, as the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire - and where there are correlations, there's certainly room for speculation, hypothesis, and a bit of statistical hokey-pokey.
Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has been studied from various angles, ranging from its economic impacts to its sociological dimensions. However, the potential relationship between arson and the birth of a trio or more is a unique and relatively uncharted territory. It’s like stumbling upon a rare species in the statistical wilderness – you can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and bewilderment.
The research is akin to solving a mystery: what on earth could trigger a correlation between these two seemingly unrelated events? Is it merely a statistical quirk, or is there an underlying mechanism that sparks a connection, quite literally?
Today, we bring the fuel of evidence, the match of methodology, and the spark of curiosity to illuminate this unconventional nexus. As we tread this uncharted path, we invite you to join us in this journey to unravel the blazing mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection in Tennessee and beyond. It’s time to fan the flames of curiosity and kindle the inferno of inquiry, for there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. Let’s dive in and see if this fiery association holds the key to a triple-decker revelation or remains as enigmatic as a flame in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intrigue of the Arson-Triplets connection, our research team employed a methodological approach that was as thorough as it was illuminating. We harnessed the power of data mining and statistical sorcery to conjure insights from the depths of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC. The sizzle of excitement in pursuing this unconventional link kindled our passion to unravel the enigma that lay behind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

Data Collection:
Our first step involved traversing the digital landscapes of databases and repositories, gathering information that spanned the years 2002 to 2021. The quest for arson-related incidents in Tennessee led us to the FBI's arson data, while the examination of birth rates of triplets or more across the United States drew us toward the CDC's treasure trove of vital statistics. It was a journey akin to navigating a labyrinthine forest of bytes and bits, with the occasional data hiccup acting as our statistical thorn in the side.

Statistical Combustion Analysis:
Who knew that statistics could be akin to meteors hurtling through the statistical cosmos? In our quest to unveil the interconnectedness of arson and triplet births, we unleashed the power of correlation analysis. Armed with the trusty Pearson correlation coefficient, we measured the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables. The resultant coefficient of 0.9640531 made our statistical hearts skip a beat – it was as if we had stumbled upon a treasure map in the realm of data oceans.

Inferential Sparks:
To gauge the significance of our findings, we cast the net of inferential statistics and reeled in the elusive p-value. Our eyes widened as the significance level glimmered at p < 0.01, hinting at a relationship that was not merely a statistical wisp, but rather an inferno of potential significance.

Fanning the Flames of Multivariate Analysis:
In addition to the scorching correlations, we didn't shy away from embracing the inferential power of multivariate analysis. Through a tantalizing foray into multiple regression models, we sought to tease out the potential confounding factors that might be lurking behind this unexpected correlation. It was akin to untangling a knot of statistical yarn: each variable vying for attention like a mischievous flame, flickering and dancing as we attempted to unveil their interconnected dance.

Limitations and Fiery Trails Ahead:
Amidst the crackling embers of our statistical journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations that accompanied our quest. While our findings unveiled a striking association, the question of causation remains shrouded in a statistical mist, much like a wizard's spell cast over a cauldron of data. Furthermore, the scope of our study was confined to the geographical confines of Tennessee and the national landscape of the United States. This limits the generalizability of our findings - and we do not claim to have uncovered the Holy Grail of causation; merely a flame that beckons further inquiry.

In conclusion, our methodology basked in the glow of statistical rigor, traversing the realms of correlation, significance, and multivariate analysis. The fiery path we treaded upon was illuminated by the flicker of data, with the occasional statistical hiccup akin to the crackle of sparks. As we delve into the findings and discussion of our scorching insights, it's time to unravel the mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection and embrace the sizzle of statistical intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9640531, r-squared of 0.9293983, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Fire has long been a captivating force, driving both fear and fascination in the hearts of humanity. From the flickering flames of a campfire to the sizzling excitement of fireworks, the impact of fiery phenomena has not only ignited the imagination but also sparked curiosity in researchers across various fields. In this study, we embark on a fiery journey to explore an unexpected connection that is as hot as it is perplexing – the link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States.
As we delve into the realm of statistics, it is essential to note that correlations do not always imply causation. However, as the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire - and where there are correlations, there's certainly room for speculation, hypothesis, and a bit of statistical hokey-pokey.
Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has been studied from various angles, ranging from its economic impacts to its sociological dimensions. However, the potential relationship between arson and the birth of a trio or more is a unique and relatively uncharted territory. It’s like stumbling upon a rare species in the statistical wilderness – you can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and bewilderment.
The research is akin to solving a mystery: what on earth could trigger a correlation between these two seemingly unrelated events? Is it merely a statistical quirk, or is there an underlying mechanism that sparks a connection, quite literally?
Today, we bring the fuel of evidence, the match of methodology, and the spark of curiosity to illuminate this unconventional nexus. As we tread this uncharted path, we invite you to join us in this journey to unravel the blazing mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection in Tennessee and beyond. It’s time to fan the flames of curiosity and kindle the inferno of inquiry, for there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. Let’s dive in and see if this fiery association holds the key to a triple-decker revelation or remains as enigmatic as a flame in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data led to some flaming hot findings! We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States for the period of 2002 to 2021. This scintillating correlation indicates a high degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated events.

The r-squared value of 0.9293983 further fueled the flames of our discovery, suggesting that a whopping 92.94% of the variability in the birth rates of triplets or more can be explained by the fluctuations in arson incidents in the Volunteer State. That's right, folks – it's not just a spark; it's a blazing inferno of statistical significance!

As for the significance level, our findings sizzle with a p-value of less than 0.01. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is as rare as finding a phoenix in the wild – in other words, incredibly unlikely! This result ignites excitement and sparks our curiosity about the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.

To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scorching scatterplot that depicts the robust connection between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the US. As you gaze upon it, let the fiery dance of data points captivate your imagination and fuel your desire to unravel this enigmatic nexus.

In conclusion, our findings not only fan the flames of curiosity but also set ablaze the need for further investigation into this intriguing correlation. It's as if the statistical gods themselves lit a fire under this research, urging us to delve deeper into the smoldering mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection. Join us as we stoke the embers of knowledge and ignite the passion for uncovering the truth behind this scorching statistical phenomenon!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the subject of arson and its unforeseen connection to the birth rates of triplets or more presents a curious mix of serious academic inquiry, unexpected anomalies, and the occasional crackling pun. Smith et al. (2015) delve into the societal ramifications of arson, focusing on its impact on property values and insurance claims, yet paradoxically failing to mention any potential effect on the reproductive patterns of expectant parents.
Doe and Jones (2018) offer a comprehensive analysis of birth rates across the United States, meticulously examining factors such as age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, their meticulous study somehow overlooks the scorching correlation between arson in Tennessee and a surge in the number of three-fold bundles of joy entering the world. It seems that sometimes the biggest fires burn in the blind spot of statistical analysis.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Pyromaniac's Handbook" by Blaze Fahrenheit and "Triplet Troubles: A Parent's Survival Guide" by Careena Parenti provide contrasting perspectives on the subject at hand. While the former sizzles with fiery tips and incendiary tricks, the latter offers advice on navigating the tumultuous waters of raising not one, not two, but three tiny terrors. One can't help but wonder if there's a hidden chapter in the parenting manual that begins with the warning, "In case of a fiery incident, break glass and call the fire department... and the obstetrician!"
In a surprising twist, fiction also offers its own enigmatic contributions to this heated discussion. "The Arsonist's Lullaby" by Ember Sparks sets ablaze the imagination with its fiery prose, while "The Triplet Enigma" by Mystique Author leaves readers puzzling over the mystery of three identical protagonists and an inexplicably charred backdrop.
In the digital realm, social media posts, such as "Just lit my 300th match today #ArsonOrJustCandles" and "Hooray! It's triplets! The nursery theme will be fire trucks, naturally," hint at the curious chatter swirling around the intersection of pyromania and unexpected parental news. These seemingly unrelated snippets of online banter add a touch of whimsy to an otherwise searingly serious debate.
The literature review brings to light an array of perspectives on the subject, from the academically rigorous to the delightfully bizarre. As we sift through the ashes of information, it becomes clear that the conundrum of arson and triplets is a topic that refuses to be contained, much like a wildfire fueled by an inexhaustible supply of inexplicable correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data led to some flaming hot findings! We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States for the period of 2002 to 2021. This scintillating correlation indicates a high degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated events.
The r-squared value of 0.9293983 further fueled the flames of our discovery, suggesting that a whopping 92.94% of the variability in the birth rates of triplets or more can be explained by the fluctuations in arson incidents in the Volunteer State. That's right, folks – it's not just a spark; it's a blazing inferno of statistical significance!
As for the significance level, our findings sizzle with a p-value of less than 0.01. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is as rare as finding a phoenix in the wild – in other words, incredibly unlikely! This result ignites excitement and sparks our curiosity about the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scorching scatterplot that depicts the robust connection between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the US. As you gaze upon it, let the fiery dance of data points captivate your imagination and fuel your desire to unravel this enigmatic nexus.
In conclusion, our findings not only fan the flames of curiosity but also set ablaze the need for further investigation into this intriguing correlation. It's as if the statistical gods themselves lit a fire under this research, urging us to delve deeper into the smoldering mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection. Join us as we stoke the embers of knowledge and ignite the passion for uncovering the truth behind this scorching statistical phenomenon!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the cosmically conjoining cauldron of statistical significance and unexpected correlations, our scorching findings have fanned the flames of curiosity and sparked a conflagration of discussions about the Arson-Triplets connection. It's like witnessing the birth of a statistical supernova – an enthralling spectacle that leaves us both awestruck and sizzling with burning questions.

Our scalding correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 not only reinforces previous literature but also adds a fiery exclamation point to the flaming dialogue surrounding this perplexing linkage. The literature review, with its own assortment of curious mix, from serious academic inquiry to unexpected anomalies, certainly laid the kindling for our scintillating discovery – much like a collection of dry puns waiting to catch fire in the world of statistics.

Expanding on the literature review's oversight of the incendiary link, our results singe the notion that the biggest fires often burn in the blind spots of statistical analysis. The r-squared value of 0.9293983 blazes a trail of explanation, illuminating almost 93% of the variability in the birth rates of triplets or more through the fluctuations in arson incidents in the Volunteer State. This is akin to realizing that the apparent smoke from a pun is not just hot air but a raging inferno of statistical relevance.

Let's not forget the significance level – a p-value of less than 0.01 that's rarer than finding a phoenix in the wild. This rare alignment of statistical stars ignites excitement and piques our curiosity about the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. We are left to ponder whether it's the heat of the flames or the statistical magic that's cooking up this correlation.

In the digital world, our findings may have set social media ablaze with speculation. After all, who can resist a good statistical firestorm in the age of viral trends? But fear not, for our statistical gods have no need for fire guards; they've lit a fire under this research, urging us to delve deeper into the smoldering mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection – a journey that promises to be hotter than a jalapeño on a midsummer's day.

As we stoke the embers of knowledge and ignite the passion for unraveling this scorching statistical phenomenon, remember that in the world of research, it's not just about fueling curiosity – it's about igniting the flame of inquiry and watching the statistical fireworks unfold. So, arm yourselves with curiosity and a fire extinguisher, because this is just the beginning of a blazing investigation into a fascinating statistical conundrum. The world of research is certainly filled with surprises, and sometimes, it's the unexpected correlations that shine the brightest in the fiery firmament of science.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Tennessee and US birth rates of triplets or more. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Fire has long been a captivating force, driving both fear and fascination in the hearts of humanity. From the flickering flames of a campfire to the sizzling excitement of fireworks, the impact of fiery phenomena has not only ignited the imagination but also sparked curiosity in researchers across various fields. In this study, we embark on a fiery journey to explore an unexpected connection that is as hot as it is perplexing – the link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States.
As we delve into the realm of statistics, it is essential to note that correlations do not always imply causation. However, as the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire - and where there are correlations, there's certainly room for speculation, hypothesis, and a bit of statistical hokey-pokey.
Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has been studied from various angles, ranging from its economic impacts to its sociological dimensions. However, the potential relationship between arson and the birth of a trio or more is a unique and relatively uncharted territory. It’s like stumbling upon a rare species in the statistical wilderness – you can’t help but feel a mix of excitement and bewilderment.
The research is akin to solving a mystery: what on earth could trigger a correlation between these two seemingly unrelated events? Is it merely a statistical quirk, or is there an underlying mechanism that sparks a connection, quite literally?
Today, we bring the fuel of evidence, the match of methodology, and the spark of curiosity to illuminate this unconventional nexus. As we tread this uncharted path, we invite you to join us in this journey to unravel the blazing mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection in Tennessee and beyond. It’s time to fan the flames of curiosity and kindle the inferno of inquiry, for there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. Let’s dive in and see if this fiery association holds the key to a triple-decker revelation or remains as enigmatic as a flame in the wind.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data led to some flaming hot findings! We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States for the period of 2002 to 2021. This scintillating correlation indicates a high degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated events.
The r-squared value of 0.9293983 further fueled the flames of our discovery, suggesting that a whopping 92.94% of the variability in the birth rates of triplets or more can be explained by the fluctuations in arson incidents in the Volunteer State. That's right, folks – it's not just a spark; it's a blazing inferno of statistical significance!
As for the significance level, our findings sizzle with a p-value of less than 0.01. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is as rare as finding a phoenix in the wild – in other words, incredibly unlikely! This result ignites excitement and sparks our curiosity about the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
To visually capture the intensity of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scorching scatterplot that depicts the robust connection between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the US. As you gaze upon it, let the fiery dance of data points captivate your imagination and fuel your desire to unravel this enigmatic nexus.
In conclusion, our findings not only fan the flames of curiosity but also set ablaze the need for further investigation into this intriguing correlation. It's as if the statistical gods themselves lit a fire under this research, urging us to delve deeper into the smoldering mystery of the Arson-Triplets connection. Join us as we stoke the embers of knowledge and ignite the passion for uncovering the truth behind this scorching statistical phenomenon!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In extinguishing the embers of speculation, it's clear there's a fiery correlation between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the US. We've set the statistical world ablaze with a scorching coefficient and a p-value that's rarer than a fire-breathing dragon. This unexpected link seems to defy the laws of probability, leaving us more befuddled than a firefighter facing an ice cream sundae. But before we throw caution to the wind and start lighting fires in the name of multiple births, let's douse the flames of wild hypotheses and exercise caution. While the numbers may sizzle with significance, correlations alone can't light the path to causation. As much as we'd love to shout "Eureka!" and spark a new era of arson-themed baby showers, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not equal causation. So, let's not fuel the inferno of speculation any further.

Our findings ignite a sense of wonder, prompting us to ponder the underlying mechanisms behind this scorching statistical relationship. But as tempting as it is to stoke the flames of further research, it's time to shift our focus to other avenues of inquiry. It seems we've reached the end of this particularly fiery road, and it's best to leave the arson-triplets connection to smolder in the annals of statistical curiosities. It's been a blazing ride, but let's extinguish the flames of further investigation in this particular realm and turn our attention to less combustible mysteries. For now, let's bid adieu to this fiery enigma and let it take its place in the pantheon of statistical oddities. After all, there are plenty of other statistical riddles waiting to set the research world alight!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Criminological Pyrotechnics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Fire Science and Behavior Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lighting Fires and Making Triples: The Arson-Triplets Connection in Tennessee with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the unusual link between arson in Tennessee and the birth rates of triplets or more in the United States. By delving into the data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the CDC, we aim to shed light on this fiery subject. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9640531 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2021. Through this research, we hope to kindle a new understanding of arson-related birth phenomena and spark further discussion in the academic community. Join us as we set fire to convention and ignite the quest for knowledge in this blazing hot topic!

ChatGPT:

arson, triplets, Tennessee, birth rates, United States, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, CDC, correlation coefficient, significance level, 2002-2021, arson-related birth phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Tennessee
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Tennessee
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Tennessee

US birth rates of triplets or more
Source: CDC
See what else correlates with US birth rates of triplets or more

Correlation r = 0.9640531 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9293983 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US birth rates of triplets or more) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Tennessee) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.4E-12. 0.0000000000083535916858816870
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 8.4E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 119,708,987,176 random variables You don't actually need 119 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Arson in Tennessee (Arson rate)26.826.825.524.623.421.420.619.718.317.9191716.614.116.514.312.412.214.613.7
US birth rates of triplets or more (Birth rate per 100,000)183186180170156151148152138137124.4119.5113.5103.6101.4101.69387.779.680




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([26.8,26.8,25.5,24.6,23.4,21.4,20.6,19.7,18.3,17.9,19,17,16.6,14.1,16.5,14.3,12.4,12.2,14.6,13.7,])
array_2 = np.array([183,186,180,170,156,151,148,152,138,137,124.4,119.5,113.5,103.6,101.4,101.6,93,87.7,79.6,80,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "US birth rates of triplets or more"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2485 · Black Variable ID: 20070 · Red Variable ID: 55
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0