about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,436 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Louisiana and the second variable is Patents granted in the US.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in UFO sightings in Louisiana led to a surge in creativity as people's imaginations ran wild, sparking a new wave of innovative ideas. It's as if the UFOs were beaming down inspiration for out-of-this-world inventions!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] In a Louisiana town, the night sky is dotted with twinkling stars and a bright, mysterious light hovers above. People of all ages gather outside, gazing up with wide-eyed wonder and animated expressions. The townsfolk are shown in a variety of outfits, from overalls to dresses to military uniforms, reflecting the diverse nature of the community. Children point excitedly while adults converse animatedly, their body language expressing curiosity and amazement. Some individuals are depicted holding quirky homemade contraptions, representing the inventive ideas sparked by the celestial phenomenon. In the backdrop, a quaint town square with cobbled streets and charming southern architecture sets the stage for the scene. The dimly lit buildings exude a warm, inviting glow, with flickering lamplight emanating from the windows. A sense of togetherness and shared intrigue permeates the illustration, as the townspeople bond over their collective fascination with the mysterious light. In a separate scene adjacent to the town square, a bustling office of patent officers is shown diligently processing a higher number of applications. The whimsical touch is captured in the form of quirky machinery and fantastical inventions displayed on desks and hanging from the ceiling. Louisianans are depicted filing patents for their new technological creations inspired by the UFO sightings, showcasing the tangible impact of the celestial event on their creative endeavors. Overall, the illustration presents a vibrant and enchanting visual narrative that encapsulates the transformative power of inspiration from the unknown, bringing to life the whimsy and inventive spirit fueled by the otherworldly phenomena. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau a meme Brutalism Magic realism Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US, in the following situation: The increase in UFO sightings in Louisiana led to a surge in interest in outer space technology and innovation. As people gazed at the mysterious lights in the sky, their curiosity sparked a wave of inventive thinking. This ultimately resulted in a higher number of patents being granted in the US, as Louisianans endeavored to create new technology that could potentially connect with or defend against extraterrestrial visitors. The UFO sightings acted as a catalyst for out-of-this-world creativity, proving that sometimes, inspiration truly can come from the great unknown!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Louisiana town, people gather outside at night, gazing up at the sky where a bright, mysterious light hovers. Their collective curiosity sparks inventive ideas, as they discuss and brainstorm about technology and innovation related to outer space. Meanwhile, in a separate scene, patent officers in the US process a higher number of applications, as Louisianans submit their new technological creations. The surge in patents reflects the impact of the UFO sightings, showing how inspiration from the unknown leads to inventive solutions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a Louisiana town, people gather outside at night, gazing up at the sky where a bright, mysterious light hovers. Their collective curiosity sparks inventive ideas, as they discuss and brainstorm about technology and innovation related to outer space. Meanwhile, in a separate scene, patent officers in the US process a higher number of applications, as Louisianans submit their new technological creations. The surge in patents reflects the impact of the UFO sightings, showing how inspiration from the unknown leads to inventive solutions. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] In a Louisiana town, the night sky is dotted with twinkling stars and a bright, mysterious light hovers above. People of all ages gather outside, gazing up with wide-eyed wonder and animated expressions. The townsfolk are shown in a variety of outfits, from overalls to dresses to military uniforms, reflecting the diverse nature of the community. Children point excitedly while adults converse animatedly, their body language expressing curiosity and amazement. Some individuals are depicted holding quirky homemade contraptions, representing the inventive ideas sparked by the celestial phenomenon. In the backdrop, a quaint town square with cobbled streets and charming southern architecture sets the stage for the scene. The dimly lit buildings exude a warm, inviting glow, with flickering lamplight emanating from the windows. A sense of togetherness and shared intrigue permeates the illustration, as the townspeople bond over their collective fascination with the mysterious light. In a separate scene adjacent to the town square, a bustling office of patent officers is shown diligently processing a higher number of applications. The whimsical touch is captured in the form of quirky machinery and fantastical inventions displayed on desks and hanging from the ceiling. Louisianans are depicted filing patents for their new technological creations inspired by the UFO sightings, showcasing the tangible impact of the celestial event on their creative endeavors. Overall, the illustration presents a vibrant and enchanting visual narrative that encapsulates the transformative power of inspiration from the unknown, bringing to life the whimsy and inventive spirit fueled by the otherworldly phenomena.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in UFO sightings in Louisiana caused Patents granted in the US to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Engineering and Research (JEER)

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

On the surface, the realms of UFO sightings and patents granted may seem as distant as the stars themselves. However, the possibility of a connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena has sparked curiosity and speculation. In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of empirical investigation to uncover the potential relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States.

Some may scoff at the notion of a connection between unidentified flying objects and human innovation, dismissing it as mere science fiction. However, as we dive into the data, we may find more substance to this connection than meets the eye. One might even say that our approach to this research is akin to a UFO sighting—driven by curiosity, shrouded in mystery, and occasionally prompting eyebrow-raising bewilderment.

The state of Louisiana, known for its rich cultural heritage and delectable cuisine, also holds a unique position in the annals of UFO lore. With this in mind, we embark on a statistical journey to explore whether there is a tangible link between the state's celestial encounters and its contribution to the body of patented inventions. After all, as they say, "What do you call a UFO in Louisiana? A bayou-fo!"

As we navigate the complexities of our analysis, we aim to approach this subject matter with scholarly rigor and a dash of levity. Our pursuit of this cosmic correlation is undergirded by the quest for intellectual enlightenment, and perhaps a touch of extraterrestrial amusement. But, to borrow from the humor of the unknown, we assure our readers that our approach is grounded in empirical research, rather than flying saucers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
On the surface, the realms of UFO sightings and patents granted may seem as distant as the stars themselves. However, the possibility of a connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena has sparked curiosity and speculation. In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of empirical investigation to uncover the potential relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States.
Some may scoff at the notion of a connection between unidentified flying objects and human innovation, dismissing it as mere science fiction. However, as we dive into the data, we may find more substance to this connection than meets the eye. One might even say that our approach to this research is akin to a UFO sighting—driven by curiosity, shrouded in mystery, and occasionally prompting eyebrow-raising bewilderment.
The state of Louisiana, known for its rich cultural heritage and delectable cuisine, also holds a unique position in the annals of UFO lore. With this in mind, we embark on a statistical journey to explore whether there is a tangible link between the state's celestial encounters and its contribution to the body of patented inventions. After all, as they say, "What do you call a UFO in Louisiana? A bayou-fo!"
As we navigate the complexities of our analysis, we aim to approach this subject matter with scholarly rigor and a dash of levity. Our pursuit of this cosmic correlation is undergirded by the quest for intellectual enlightenment, and perhaps a touch of extraterrestrial amusement. But, to borrow from the humor of the unknown, we assure our readers that our approach is grounded in empirical research, rather than flying saucers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between UFO sightings and patents granted has seldom been the focus of empirical inquiry. Our investigation is poised at the intersection of ufology and intellectual property. The existing body of literature presents a paucity of research delving into the potential relationship between these enigmatic phenomena.

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that UFO sightings have been a subject of fascination for centuries, with anecdotal accounts permeating popular culture and inspiring myriad interpretations of extraterrestrial presence. The societal impact of these sightings cannot be dismissed outright, especially when considering the pervasive influence of alien narratives in literature and media. However, rigorous empirical evidence linking UFO encounters to patents granted remains largely elusive.

This dearth of direct empirical evidence only fuels our curiosity to venture beyond the confines of conventional research. As we wade into this unusual domain of inquiry, we are reminded of a pertinent jest: "Why don't aliens eat clowns? Because they taste funny!"

Examining the associated literature from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Doe and Jones" indicate that there exists a robust record of patented inventions that have significantly shaped technological progress. The wealth of human ingenuity represented in these patents underscores the intricate tapestry of innovative endeavors. Nevertheless, the potential correlation with UFO sightings introduces an element of unpredictability that prompts our scholarly intrigue.

While the topic of UFO sightings may evoke skepticism, we are not averse to exploring unconventional avenues of inquiry to shed light on unexpected correlations. In a similar vein, our approach to this research mirrors the sentiment of the popular adage: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"

Turning our attention to related non-fiction literature, "UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry" by Michael Swords and Robert Powell examines the historical nexus between UFO sightings and governmental responses. The intersections of official documentation and public fascination with UFOs provide a rich backdrop for contextualizing the potential influence of these phenomena on inventive activities.

In the realm of fiction, works such as "The X-Files: Earth Children Are Weird" by Jason Rekulak and Kim Smith epitomize the enduring appeal of extraterrestrial themes in popular culture. While fiction may not offer empirical evidence per se, it illuminates the nuanced interplay between human imagination and speculative phenomena. This interplay is not unlike the intricate dance between UFO sightings and patents granted—a cosmic waltz of inspiration and innovation.

Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, "Escape from the Aliens in Outer Space" serves as a whimsical reminder of the allure and intricacy of encounters with the unknown. As we navigate the complex terrain of our statistical analysis, our quest for understanding is akin to endeavoring to escape the clutches of uncertainty, albeit with a healthy dose of academic rigor.

In summary, while the association between UFO sightings in Louisiana and patents granted in the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance, our inquiry is underpinned by the pursuit of empirical evidence. As we embark on this illuminating endeavor, we acknowledge the enigmatic allure of UFO narratives and the potential implications for the landscape of human innovation.

At the heart of our investigation lies an adage of cosmic proportions: "Why did the alien break up with his girlfriend? He felt they had no chemistry!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO . You used data from 1975 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
On the surface, the realms of UFO sightings and patents granted may seem as distant as the stars themselves. However, the possibility of a connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena has sparked curiosity and speculation. In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of empirical investigation to uncover the potential relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States.
Some may scoff at the notion of a connection between unidentified flying objects and human innovation, dismissing it as mere science fiction. However, as we dive into the data, we may find more substance to this connection than meets the eye. One might even say that our approach to this research is akin to a UFO sighting—driven by curiosity, shrouded in mystery, and occasionally prompting eyebrow-raising bewilderment.
The state of Louisiana, known for its rich cultural heritage and delectable cuisine, also holds a unique position in the annals of UFO lore. With this in mind, we embark on a statistical journey to explore whether there is a tangible link between the state's celestial encounters and its contribution to the body of patented inventions. After all, as they say, "What do you call a UFO in Louisiana? A bayou-fo!"
As we navigate the complexities of our analysis, we aim to approach this subject matter with scholarly rigor and a dash of levity. Our pursuit of this cosmic correlation is undergirded by the quest for intellectual enlightenment, and perhaps a touch of extraterrestrial amusement. But, to borrow from the humor of the unknown, we assure our readers that our approach is grounded in empirical research, rather than flying saucers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a methodological framework designed to disentangle the intricacies of the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and patent grants in the United States. Our data analysis leveraged information collected from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, covering the years from 1975 to 2020. The primary aim was to untangle the cosmic conundrum of whether extraterrestrial encounters in Louisiana have any discernible impact on the level of inventive activity evidenced by patent grants. One might say that we embarked on a statistical quest of cosmic proportions—not just any usual close encounter of the statistical kind!

To commence our analysis, data on UFO sightings in Louisiana were collated and meticulously cross-referenced with the corresponding patent grants issued by the USPTO during the same period. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we applied a series of statistical techniques that could handle the potential outliers and anomalies that may arise when exploring such unique phenomena. We like to think of this approach as akin to navigating through a cosmic minefield - one wrong step, and we could end up with some astronomical confounders!

The statistical methodology employed in this study involved the calculation of correlation coefficients and the implementation of regression analysis to examine the strength and direction of the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and patents granted in the United States. We ensured that our analysis accounted for various confounding variables, such as economic trends, technological advancements, and perhaps even the occasional alien invasion. We wanted to make sure that our statistical models were as robust as an intergalactic spaceship, ready to voyage through the unknown territory of celestial correlations.

Furthermore, considering the unique nature of the research question, we ventured into the realm of time series analysis to investigate potential temporal patterns and changes in the relationship between UFO sightings and patent grants over the years. The goal was to unravel whether there were any discernible fluctuations in the connection between these two seemingly disparate occurrences. One might say that our approach to this temporal analysis was like studying the orbits of planets—always on the lookout for any gravitational anomalies, or perhaps in this case, extraterrestrial influences that may affect our statistical findings.

To ensure the integrity of our findings, we conducted rigorous sensitivity analyses and robustness checks to scrutinize the stability of the observed relationship under different model specifications and assumptions. After all, when you're dealing with a topic as astonishing as UFOs and patents, it's essential to be as thorough as possible. One might say that we took our statistical scrutiny to new heights, or should we say, new dimensions, to ensure that our findings were not just statistically significant, but also out of this world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO .

For the time period 1975 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.7993224, r-squared of 0.6389163, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
On the surface, the realms of UFO sightings and patents granted may seem as distant as the stars themselves. However, the possibility of a connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena has sparked curiosity and speculation. In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of empirical investigation to uncover the potential relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States.
Some may scoff at the notion of a connection between unidentified flying objects and human innovation, dismissing it as mere science fiction. However, as we dive into the data, we may find more substance to this connection than meets the eye. One might even say that our approach to this research is akin to a UFO sighting—driven by curiosity, shrouded in mystery, and occasionally prompting eyebrow-raising bewilderment.
The state of Louisiana, known for its rich cultural heritage and delectable cuisine, also holds a unique position in the annals of UFO lore. With this in mind, we embark on a statistical journey to explore whether there is a tangible link between the state's celestial encounters and its contribution to the body of patented inventions. After all, as they say, "What do you call a UFO in Louisiana? A bayou-fo!"
As we navigate the complexities of our analysis, we aim to approach this subject matter with scholarly rigor and a dash of levity. Our pursuit of this cosmic correlation is undergirded by the quest for intellectual enlightenment, and perhaps a touch of extraterrestrial amusement. But, to borrow from the humor of the unknown, we assure our readers that our approach is grounded in empirical research, rather than flying saucers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation unearth a strong correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that as the number of reported UFO sightings in Louisiana increased, so did the number of patents granted by the USPTO. One might say that these findings are truly "out of this world," just like the objects they seek to explain.

The r-squared value of 0.6389163 further solidifies the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 63.89% of the variability in patent grants can be explained by the variability in UFO sightings in Louisiana. It appears that there is more to the mysterious lights in the Louisiana sky than mere observation—perhaps they are sparking innovative ideas across the nation!

Moreover, our analysis reveals a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the association between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States. These results provide compelling evidence that the relationship between these two phenomena is not a mere fluke but rather a robust and credible connection. One might quip that this association is "patently" clear, much like the crystal-clear sighting of an unidentified object in the night sky.

To visually capture the strength of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States from 1975 to 2020.

In conclusion, our findings not only expose a compelling correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and inventive activities reflected in patent grants but also open the door to fascinating inquiries about the potential cosmic influence on human creativity. These results may prompt us to reconsider the impact of celestial encounters on Earth's intellectual property landscape. It seems that the connection between UFO sightings and patents granted is more than just a far-fetched idea; it has statistical support that is truly, well, "out of this world."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between UFO sightings and patents granted has seldom been the focus of empirical inquiry. Our investigation is poised at the intersection of ufology and intellectual property. The existing body of literature presents a paucity of research delving into the potential relationship between these enigmatic phenomena.
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that UFO sightings have been a subject of fascination for centuries, with anecdotal accounts permeating popular culture and inspiring myriad interpretations of extraterrestrial presence. The societal impact of these sightings cannot be dismissed outright, especially when considering the pervasive influence of alien narratives in literature and media. However, rigorous empirical evidence linking UFO encounters to patents granted remains largely elusive.
This dearth of direct empirical evidence only fuels our curiosity to venture beyond the confines of conventional research. As we wade into this unusual domain of inquiry, we are reminded of a pertinent jest: "Why don't aliens eat clowns? Because they taste funny!"
Examining the associated literature from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Doe and Jones" indicate that there exists a robust record of patented inventions that have significantly shaped technological progress. The wealth of human ingenuity represented in these patents underscores the intricate tapestry of innovative endeavors. Nevertheless, the potential correlation with UFO sightings introduces an element of unpredictability that prompts our scholarly intrigue.
While the topic of UFO sightings may evoke skepticism, we are not averse to exploring unconventional avenues of inquiry to shed light on unexpected correlations. In a similar vein, our approach to this research mirrors the sentiment of the popular adage: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!"
Turning our attention to related non-fiction literature, "UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry" by Michael Swords and Robert Powell examines the historical nexus between UFO sightings and governmental responses. The intersections of official documentation and public fascination with UFOs provide a rich backdrop for contextualizing the potential influence of these phenomena on inventive activities.
In the realm of fiction, works such as "The X-Files: Earth Children Are Weird" by Jason Rekulak and Kim Smith epitomize the enduring appeal of extraterrestrial themes in popular culture. While fiction may not offer empirical evidence per se, it illuminates the nuanced interplay between human imagination and speculative phenomena. This interplay is not unlike the intricate dance between UFO sightings and patents granted—a cosmic waltz of inspiration and innovation.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, "Escape from the Aliens in Outer Space" serves as a whimsical reminder of the allure and intricacy of encounters with the unknown. As we navigate the complex terrain of our statistical analysis, our quest for understanding is akin to endeavoring to escape the clutches of uncertainty, albeit with a healthy dose of academic rigor.
In summary, while the association between UFO sightings in Louisiana and patents granted in the United States may seem far-fetched at first glance, our inquiry is underpinned by the pursuit of empirical evidence. As we embark on this illuminating endeavor, we acknowledge the enigmatic allure of UFO narratives and the potential implications for the landscape of human innovation.
At the heart of our investigation lies an adage of cosmic proportions: "Why did the alien break up with his girlfriend? He felt they had no chemistry!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unearth a strong correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that as the number of reported UFO sightings in Louisiana increased, so did the number of patents granted by the USPTO. One might say that these findings are truly "out of this world," just like the objects they seek to explain.
The r-squared value of 0.6389163 further solidifies the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 63.89% of the variability in patent grants can be explained by the variability in UFO sightings in Louisiana. It appears that there is more to the mysterious lights in the Louisiana sky than mere observation—perhaps they are sparking innovative ideas across the nation!
Moreover, our analysis reveals a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the association between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States. These results provide compelling evidence that the relationship between these two phenomena is not a mere fluke but rather a robust and credible connection. One might quip that this association is "patently" clear, much like the crystal-clear sighting of an unidentified object in the night sky.
To visually capture the strength of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States from 1975 to 2020.
In conclusion, our findings not only expose a compelling correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and inventive activities reflected in patent grants but also open the door to fascinating inquiries about the potential cosmic influence on human creativity. These results may prompt us to reconsider the impact of celestial encounters on Earth's intellectual property landscape. It seems that the connection between UFO sightings and patents granted is more than just a far-fetched idea; it has statistical support that is truly, well, "out of this world."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States has yielded intriguing results that add a new dimension to the study of inventive activities. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and the remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 establish a compelling link between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. One could say that these findings are more captivating than a close encounter of the third kind!

Our results align with prior research that has delved into the mysterious allure of UFO sightings and their potential influence on human innovation. As "Smith et al." suggests, the enduring fascination with extraterrestrial phenomena permeates popular culture and stimulates diverse interpretations of otherworldly presence. Despite the tongue-in-cheek nature of the subject matter, our findings substantiate the idea that UFO encounters may indeed spark inventive impulses, similar to the way a good dad joke sparks laughter at a family gathering.

In corroborating the robust record of patented inventions shaping technological progress highlighted by "Doe and Jones," our research unveils a previously unexplored connection that adds an unprecedented twist to the intricate tapestry of innovative endeavors. The sheer statistical significance of the association suggests that the potential correlation with UFO sightings introduces an element of unpredictability into the intellectual property landscape. One might even posit that Louisianans are attracting patents like UFOs attract conspiracy theories—they're simply out of this world!

The substantial r-squared value of 0.6389163 further bolsters the strength of our findings, shedding light on the substantial variability in patent grants that can be explained by the reported UFO sightings in Louisiana. It seems that the enigmatic lights in the Louisiana sky not only capture attention but also catalyze inventive ideation, much like a good punchline incites laughter at a comedy club.

In juxtaposing our results with the rich backdrop of the historical nexus between UFO sightings and governmental responses, as illuminated by "UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry," this research introduces a new dimension to the dialogues on the societal impact of unidentified aerial phenomena. In doing so, we prompt contemplation about the celestial influence on Earth's intellectual property landscape and invite readers to think outside the proverbial box, just as one would mull over a good riddle.

Our scatterplot visually captures the strength of the correlation, offering a compelling illustration of the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States from 1975 to 2020. This visualization underscores the statistical support for the connection, providing a pictorial representation as clear as a well-documented UFO sighting on a starry night.

In conclusion, our findings have stunning implications for how we view the potential extraterrestrial impact on human creativity. By substantiating a tangible association between UFO sightings and patents granted, our research lays the groundwork for further inquiry into the reciprocal influence of celestial encounters and human innovative activities. These results not only open new avenues for scholarly exploration but also showcase the exhilarating potential of unconventional investigations in illuminating unexpected correlations. It seems that the connection between UFO sightings and patents granted is more than just a far-fetched idea; it has statistical support that is truly "out of this world."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Louisiana and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.

Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
On the surface, the realms of UFO sightings and patents granted may seem as distant as the stars themselves. However, the possibility of a connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena has sparked curiosity and speculation. In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of empirical investigation to uncover the potential relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States.
Some may scoff at the notion of a connection between unidentified flying objects and human innovation, dismissing it as mere science fiction. However, as we dive into the data, we may find more substance to this connection than meets the eye. One might even say that our approach to this research is akin to a UFO sighting—driven by curiosity, shrouded in mystery, and occasionally prompting eyebrow-raising bewilderment.
The state of Louisiana, known for its rich cultural heritage and delectable cuisine, also holds a unique position in the annals of UFO lore. With this in mind, we embark on a statistical journey to explore whether there is a tangible link between the state's celestial encounters and its contribution to the body of patented inventions. After all, as they say, "What do you call a UFO in Louisiana? A bayou-fo!"
As we navigate the complexities of our analysis, we aim to approach this subject matter with scholarly rigor and a dash of levity. Our pursuit of this cosmic correlation is undergirded by the quest for intellectual enlightenment, and perhaps a touch of extraterrestrial amusement. But, to borrow from the humor of the unknown, we assure our readers that our approach is grounded in empirical research, rather than flying saucers.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unearth a strong correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that as the number of reported UFO sightings in Louisiana increased, so did the number of patents granted by the USPTO. One might say that these findings are truly "out of this world," just like the objects they seek to explain.
The r-squared value of 0.6389163 further solidifies the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 63.89% of the variability in patent grants can be explained by the variability in UFO sightings in Louisiana. It appears that there is more to the mysterious lights in the Louisiana sky than mere observation—perhaps they are sparking innovative ideas across the nation!
Moreover, our analysis reveals a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the association between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the issuance of patents in the United States. These results provide compelling evidence that the relationship between these two phenomena is not a mere fluke but rather a robust and credible connection. One might quip that this association is "patently" clear, much like the crystal-clear sighting of an unidentified object in the night sky.
To visually capture the strength of this correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States from 1975 to 2020.
In conclusion, our findings not only expose a compelling correlation between UFO sightings in Louisiana and inventive activities reflected in patent grants but also open the door to fascinating inquiries about the potential cosmic influence on human creativity. These results may prompt us to reconsider the impact of celestial encounters on Earth's intellectual property landscape. It seems that the connection between UFO sightings and patents granted is more than just a far-fetched idea; it has statistical support that is truly, well, "out of this world."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 suggests a profound positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the sightings of unidentified flying objects in Louisiana may indeed hold the key to unlocking human ingenuity. One might even say that this celestial connection is not just up in the air but firmly grounded in empirical data – a bit like a UFO that has landed, leaving a tangible mark on our patent landscape.

Furthermore, the strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this association, reinforcing the notion that the correlation we have uncovered is not merely a figment of our imagination but a bona fide empirical pattern. It seems that the extraterrestrial activities in Louisiana are not just creating a buzz among the locals, but are also sparking inventive ideas across the nation. One might say that these findings are indeed "extra-terrestrially" significant, much like a good ol' dad joke.

While our analysis has provided compelling evidence of the correlation between UFO sightings and patents granted, it also raises more questions than answers. Nevertheless, it is evident that further exploration of this cosmic correlation holds promise for both researchers and enthusiasts alike. One might even say that this field of study is, quite literally, "out of this world" and ripe for future investigations.

In this vein, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. Research has flown to new heights, and we can finally say that we have cracked the UFO-IP code wide open. The future of innovation may no longer be light-years away, but right here in our own backyard – surrounded by the odd and the unexplained.

In parting, we hope our findings leave the scientific community and readers "star-struck," much like a UFO sighting that defies explanation. And, as we bid adieu to this research, we leave you with a final thought: "Why don't aliens eat clowns? Because they taste funny." Thus, concludes our cosmic venture into the puzzling yet captivating nexus of UFO sightings and patented innovations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Engineering and Research (JEER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Extraterrestrial Inquiry and Innovation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Luminous Louisiana: Linking UFO Sightings and US Patent Grants with an abstract of This research investigates the relationship between UFO sightings in Louisiana and the number of patents granted in the United States. We leverage data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office to scrutinize this unexplored linkage. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal surprising insights into the potential intergalactic influence on human innovation. Furthermore, we unearth a correlation coefficient of 0.7993224 and a striking p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the significant association between UFO sightings in the Pelican State and patents granted by the USPTO from 1975 to 2020.
Our findings not only highlight the tantalizing correlation between extraterrestrial encounters and inventive activities but also provoke contemplation about the celestial impact on Earth's intellectual property landscape. One might say that Louisianans are attracting patents like flying saucers attract curiosity—out of this world!

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings, US Patent Grants, Louisiana, National UFO Reporting Center, United States Patent and Trademark Office, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, Pelican State, USPTO, intergalactic influence, human innovation, extraterrestrial encounters, inventive activities, celestial impact, intellectual property landscape, flying saucers, Louisianans

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Louisiana
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Louisiana
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Louisiana

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Correlation r = 0.7993224 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6389163 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Louisiana) over the 46 years from 1975 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-11. 0.0000000000273658552934208300
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 2.7E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,541,887,300 random variables You don't actually need 36 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 45 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 45 because we have two variables measured over a period of 46 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
UFO sightings in Louisiana (UFO sightings)3435722422321644024238811202115223141292723445428334149101594533254138
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)768107538869781705145241366170710646327661982726507724576862893858427210253399077106696107394109746113587113834121696124069163142169085175979183970184375187012181299157718196405182899185224191927244341247713276788302948326032325980333583351403339992391103388900




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,4,3,5,7,2,2,4,2,2,3,2,1,6,4,4,0,2,4,2,3,8,8,11,20,21,15,22,31,41,29,27,23,44,54,28,33,41,49,101,59,45,33,25,41,38,])
array_2 = np.array([76810,75388,69781,70514,52413,66170,71064,63276,61982,72650,77245,76862,89385,84272,102533,99077,106696,107394,109746,113587,113834,121696,124069,163142,169085,175979,183970,184375,187012,181299,157718,196405,182899,185224,191927,244341,247713,276788,302948,326032,325980,333583,351403,339992,391103,388900,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 2436 · Black Variable ID: 1185 · Red Variable ID: 848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0