Report an error
UFO sightings in Louisiana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Elsa | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.86 | 39yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.8 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.8 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.79 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.78 | 47yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Louisiana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)