about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,371 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Namibia.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's a-maize-ing, but as GMO corn in North Dakota flourished, it somehow led to a kernel of truth spreading globally. You see, the cornstalks reached new heights, ear-ily coinciding with the demand for ethanol, which meant more production and ultimately, a huskier supply of jet fuel in Namibia. It's a corn-nection that really takes off!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a North Dakota cornfield basking in the bright sun, with rows of tall genetically modified corn standing prominently. The emerald leaves of the corn glisten in the gentle breeze as jet fuel molecules swirl around them like tiny fireflies. Parallel to this, create the image of a vibrant red and white airplane in Namibia, gushing with jet fuel and exhibiting powerful engines. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic a meme Celtic art Low poly Celtic art
ChatGPT: Celtic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia, in the following situation: The genetically modified corn developed a unique ability to attract jet fuel molecules, leading to unintended contamination during transportation and causing a surge in jet fuel usage in Namibia. It's like the corn was saying, "Fill 'er up... with extra corn-boosted power!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a North Dakota cornfield, rows of tall, genetically modified corn stand proudly under the bright sun. Their emerald leaves shimmer in the gentle breeze. Jet fuel molecules seem to be drawn to the corn, swirling around it like tiny fireflies. Meanwhile, across the world in Namibia, a vibrant red and white airplane gushes with jet fuel, its engines roaring with extra power.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Celtic art ] and depicting this scene: In a North Dakota cornfield, rows of tall, genetically modified corn stand proudly under the bright sun. Their emerald leaves shimmer in the gentle breeze. Jet fuel molecules seem to be drawn to the corn, swirling around it like tiny fireflies. Meanwhile, across the world in Namibia, a vibrant red and white airplane gushes with jet fuel, its engines roaring with extra power. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a North Dakota cornfield basking in the bright sun, with rows of tall genetically modified corn standing prominently. The emerald leaves of the corn glisten in the gentle breeze as jet fuel molecules swirl around them like tiny fireflies. Parallel to this, create the image of a vibrant red and white airplane in Namibia, gushing with jet fuel and exhibiting powerful engines.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused Jet fuel used in Namibia to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia

The Journal of Transcontinental Agro-Techno Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intersection of biotechnology and jet fuel may initially sound like the premise of a science fiction novel, but our research reveals an unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. This unusual relationship, though met with raised eyebrows and perhaps a few corny jokes, has sparked our curiosity and led us down a path of investigation that has yielded some surprising results.

As the global demand for both GMO corn and jet fuel continues to grow, understanding any potential interplay between the two is of paramount importance. While on the surface, it may seem like comparing apples to oranges (or in this case, corn to jet fuel), our study challenges this notion and finds a statistical connection that demands attention.

The goal of this paper is to showcase the unexpected correlation discovered through our meticulous analysis of agricultural and energy data. We hope to shed light on the links between GMO technology and the aviation industry, and to inspire further research into this unexplored territory. So, buckle up as we embark on this unconventional journey through the realm of agricultural biotechnology and the aviation sector!

Our investigation begins with an exploration of the underlying factors that prompted us to examine this curious relationship. From the fertile fields of North Dakota to the distant skies above Namibia, our inquiry uncovers a connection that stretches across continents and industries. With a blend of seriousness and whimsy, we invite our readers to accompany us as we delve into the intertwined realms of crop genetics and air travel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of biotechnology and jet fuel may initially sound like the premise of a science fiction novel, but our research reveals an unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. This unusual relationship, though met with raised eyebrows and perhaps a few corny jokes, has sparked our curiosity and led us down a path of investigation that has yielded some surprising results.
As the global demand for both GMO corn and jet fuel continues to grow, understanding any potential interplay between the two is of paramount importance. While on the surface, it may seem like comparing apples to oranges (or in this case, corn to jet fuel), our study challenges this notion and finds a statistical connection that demands attention.
The goal of this paper is to showcase the unexpected correlation discovered through our meticulous analysis of agricultural and energy data. We hope to shed light on the links between GMO technology and the aviation industry, and to inspire further research into this unexplored territory. So, buckle up as we embark on this unconventional journey through the realm of agricultural biotechnology and the aviation sector!
Our investigation begins with an exploration of the underlying factors that prompted us to examine this curious relationship. From the fertile fields of North Dakota to the distant skies above Namibia, our inquiry uncovers a connection that stretches across continents and industries. With a blend of seriousness and whimsy, we invite our readers to accompany us as we delve into the intertwined realms of crop genetics and air travel.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and jet fuel consumption has garnered scholarly attention in recent years. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of GMO adoption on agricultural productivity, while Doe and Jones (2018) examined the trends in jet fuel consumption across international airline industries. These studies, though comprehensive in their respective domains, did not explicitly explore the potential correlation between the two seemingly disparate factors.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan offers an insightful look into the complexities of modern food production and consumption, shedding light on the prevalence of GMOs in the agricultural landscape. Pollan's work, while not directly focused on the connection to jet fuel, provides foundational knowledge about the prevalence and impact of GMOs in food systems.

On the flip side, "Airframe" by Michael Crichton takes readers on a high-flying adventure through the aviation industry, exploring the intricate mechanisms behind airline operations. While this work is a work of fiction, the attention to detail in depicting aviation technology and operations offers intriguing parallels to the real-world dynamics of jet fuel demand and usage.

Movies such as "Corn Air" and "Jet Fuel Jamboree" have also piqued the interest of audiences with their imaginative portrayals of corn-related air travel adventures. While these films may not offer scientific insights, their creative narratives have contributed to the popular discourse on the interaction between agricultural products and aviation fuels.

As we navigate through this unconventional research landscape, it becomes clear that uncovering the intricate connections between GMO corn in North Dakota and jet fuel in Namibia requires a nuanced approach. While our findings may stir up some corny humor, the statistical significance of our results demands thoughtful consideration and further exploration of this unexpected relationship. So, let's brace ourselves for a bumpy but entertaining ride as we embark on this research journey through the cornfields and skies!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of biotechnology and jet fuel may initially sound like the premise of a science fiction novel, but our research reveals an unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. This unusual relationship, though met with raised eyebrows and perhaps a few corny jokes, has sparked our curiosity and led us down a path of investigation that has yielded some surprising results.
As the global demand for both GMO corn and jet fuel continues to grow, understanding any potential interplay between the two is of paramount importance. While on the surface, it may seem like comparing apples to oranges (or in this case, corn to jet fuel), our study challenges this notion and finds a statistical connection that demands attention.
The goal of this paper is to showcase the unexpected correlation discovered through our meticulous analysis of agricultural and energy data. We hope to shed light on the links between GMO technology and the aviation industry, and to inspire further research into this unexplored territory. So, buckle up as we embark on this unconventional journey through the realm of agricultural biotechnology and the aviation sector!
Our investigation begins with an exploration of the underlying factors that prompted us to examine this curious relationship. From the fertile fields of North Dakota to the distant skies above Namibia, our inquiry uncovers a connection that stretches across continents and industries. With a blend of seriousness and whimsy, we invite our readers to accompany us as we delve into the intertwined realms of crop genetics and air travel.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic association between GMO corn in North Dakota and jet fuel in Namibia, our research team employed a multifaceted methodological approach that could be likened to untangling a particularly stubborn knot or navigating a corn maze in a jet plane. Our investigation relied on both quantitative and qualitative analyses, as we sought to sift through the voluminous data and cultivate a deeper understanding of this unanticipated correlation.

First and foremost, we gathered an extensive dataset from the digital fields of the internet, akin to harvesting information from a virtual cornucopia. The primary sources of our data were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, which provided us with a bountiful harvest of statistical insights spanning from 2005 to 2021. This allowed us to cast a wide net over the temporal landscape, capturing the evolution of GMO corn production in North Dakota and the utilization of jet fuel in Namibia.

Employing a method akin to genetic modification itself, we employed rigorous statistical analyses to genetically engineer our dataset, fusing disparate strands of information to identify potential patterns and relationships. Our research team delved into the depths of correlation coefficients, t-tests, and regression analyses, applying these analytical tools with the precision of a GMO scientist wielding a pipette in a laboratory. Through these statistical maneuvers, we aimed to unearth any kernels of truth that may lie embedded within the data, much like prospectors sifting through riverbeds in search of golden nuggets.

Furthermore, our methodology involved geographical and sociological investigations, akin to traveling through the fields of North Dakota and soaring in the skies above Namibia. This multifaceted approach enabled us to appreciate the dynamic interplay between agricultural practices in one region and the energy consumption patterns in another, bridging the gap between the terrestrial and airborne realms.

In essence, our methodology mirrored the complexity of the subject matter at hand, blending scientific rigor with a touch of whimsy as we unraveled the peculiar conundrum of the corny connection between GMOs in North Dakota and jet fuel in Namibia. Through this methodological odyssey, we endeavored to approach our research with a spirit of curiosity and exploration, embracing the unexpected and shedding light on an intriguing yet overlooked facet of the agricultural and aviation landscapes.

In the end, our methodology sought to pave the runway for a comprehensive understanding of the interwoven tapestry of GMO technology and the jet setting industry, steering our investigation toward new horizons and fostering a deeper appreciation for the quirky connections that underpin our global ecosystem.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2005 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9214996, r-squared of 0.8491615, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of biotechnology and jet fuel may initially sound like the premise of a science fiction novel, but our research reveals an unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. This unusual relationship, though met with raised eyebrows and perhaps a few corny jokes, has sparked our curiosity and led us down a path of investigation that has yielded some surprising results.
As the global demand for both GMO corn and jet fuel continues to grow, understanding any potential interplay between the two is of paramount importance. While on the surface, it may seem like comparing apples to oranges (or in this case, corn to jet fuel), our study challenges this notion and finds a statistical connection that demands attention.
The goal of this paper is to showcase the unexpected correlation discovered through our meticulous analysis of agricultural and energy data. We hope to shed light on the links between GMO technology and the aviation industry, and to inspire further research into this unexplored territory. So, buckle up as we embark on this unconventional journey through the realm of agricultural biotechnology and the aviation sector!
Our investigation begins with an exploration of the underlying factors that prompted us to examine this curious relationship. From the fertile fields of North Dakota to the distant skies above Namibia, our inquiry uncovers a connection that stretches across continents and industries. With a blend of seriousness and whimsy, we invite our readers to accompany us as we delve into the intertwined realms of crop genetics and air travel.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a striking correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and the r-squared value of 0.8491615 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the correlation, highlighting the unexpected nature of our findings.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual depiction of the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia, demonstrating the surprising connection between these two factors. While this unanticipated relationship may elicit a few chuckles, the statistical evidence supports the validity of this correlation.

The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the need for further investigation into the potential interplay between biotechnology in agriculture and energy consumption in the aviation sector. The unexpected nature of this correlation demonstrates the complex and often overlooked relationships that exist within the global agricultural and energy landscapes. Despite its corny undertones, this correlation merits continued exploration and analysis to unravel the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing connection.

In conclusion, our research exposes the unanticipated link between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and jet fuel consumption in Namibia, urging further inquiry into the interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This peculiar correlation shines a light on the interconnectedness of industries and highlights the need for comprehensive investigations into the far-reaching effects of agricultural biotechnology on energy consumption patterns. So, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate this unexpected terrain of GMOs and jet fuel, where the intersection of agricultural and aviation endeavors takes flight!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and jet fuel consumption has garnered scholarly attention in recent years. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of GMO adoption on agricultural productivity, while Doe and Jones (2018) examined the trends in jet fuel consumption across international airline industries. These studies, though comprehensive in their respective domains, did not explicitly explore the potential correlation between the two seemingly disparate factors.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan offers an insightful look into the complexities of modern food production and consumption, shedding light on the prevalence of GMOs in the agricultural landscape. Pollan's work, while not directly focused on the connection to jet fuel, provides foundational knowledge about the prevalence and impact of GMOs in food systems.
On the flip side, "Airframe" by Michael Crichton takes readers on a high-flying adventure through the aviation industry, exploring the intricate mechanisms behind airline operations. While this work is a work of fiction, the attention to detail in depicting aviation technology and operations offers intriguing parallels to the real-world dynamics of jet fuel demand and usage.
Movies such as "Corn Air" and "Jet Fuel Jamboree" have also piqued the interest of audiences with their imaginative portrayals of corn-related air travel adventures. While these films may not offer scientific insights, their creative narratives have contributed to the popular discourse on the interaction between agricultural products and aviation fuels.
As we navigate through this unconventional research landscape, it becomes clear that uncovering the intricate connections between GMO corn in North Dakota and jet fuel in Namibia requires a nuanced approach. While our findings may stir up some corny humor, the statistical significance of our results demands thoughtful consideration and further exploration of this unexpected relationship. So, let's brace ourselves for a bumpy but entertaining ride as we embark on this research journey through the cornfields and skies!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a striking correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and the r-squared value of 0.8491615 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the correlation, highlighting the unexpected nature of our findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual depiction of the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia, demonstrating the surprising connection between these two factors. While this unanticipated relationship may elicit a few chuckles, the statistical evidence supports the validity of this correlation.
The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the need for further investigation into the potential interplay between biotechnology in agriculture and energy consumption in the aviation sector. The unexpected nature of this correlation demonstrates the complex and often overlooked relationships that exist within the global agricultural and energy landscapes. Despite its corny undertones, this correlation merits continued exploration and analysis to unravel the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing connection.
In conclusion, our research exposes the unanticipated link between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and jet fuel consumption in Namibia, urging further inquiry into the interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This peculiar correlation shines a light on the interconnectedness of industries and highlights the need for comprehensive investigations into the far-reaching effects of agricultural biotechnology on energy consumption patterns. So, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate this unexpected terrain of GMOs and jet fuel, where the intersection of agricultural and aviation endeavors takes flight!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia has been a subject of whimsical speculation and wacky hypotheses. While the initial inquiries into this connection may have seemed like a flight of fancy, our study has cleared the runway for some serious investigation.

In line with the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), we meticulously combed through the data, expecting to uncover some kernels of truth to support the conjectures of Pollan and the imaginative musings of Michael Crichton and Hollywood. Lo and behold, our findings soared to new heights by confirming a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables.

As we dipped our toes into the maize of data, the correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and the r-squared value of 0.8491615 took us by surprise like an unexpected turbulence during a flight. The p-value of less than 0.01 was the golden ticket that cemented the validity of our findings, propelling us into the stratosphere of statistical significance.

Building upon the insights from "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and the fictional but technology-rich "Airframe," our study has provided empirical evidence worthy of consideration. As we scrutinize Fig. 1, the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the robust relationship between GMO use in corn production in North Dakota and jet fuel consumption in Namibia, evoking a feeling akin to witnessing a whimsical cornfield morphing into an aviation hub.

Our results not only elevate the status of this seemingly corny correlation to one of substantial relevance but also call for a deep dive into the underlying mechanisms that tie biotechnology and aviation fuel consumption in a perplexing knot. To borrow from the creative narratives of "Corn Air" and "Jet Fuel Jamboree," our findings magnify the intrigue surrounding the interaction between agriculture and aviation, transforming this unexpected connection into a tale worthy of exploration.

In the grand scheme of scholarly investigations, our study propels the unconventional into the realm of possibility and beckons for further scrutiny and elaboration. So, grab your peanuts and fasten your seatbelts, as we prepare for a scientific odyssey through the cornfields and skies, where the improbable becomes the impetus for inquisitive minds to soar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Jet fuel used in Namibia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of biotechnology and jet fuel may initially sound like the premise of a science fiction novel, but our research reveals an unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. This unusual relationship, though met with raised eyebrows and perhaps a few corny jokes, has sparked our curiosity and led us down a path of investigation that has yielded some surprising results.
As the global demand for both GMO corn and jet fuel continues to grow, understanding any potential interplay between the two is of paramount importance. While on the surface, it may seem like comparing apples to oranges (or in this case, corn to jet fuel), our study challenges this notion and finds a statistical connection that demands attention.
The goal of this paper is to showcase the unexpected correlation discovered through our meticulous analysis of agricultural and energy data. We hope to shed light on the links between GMO technology and the aviation industry, and to inspire further research into this unexplored territory. So, buckle up as we embark on this unconventional journey through the realm of agricultural biotechnology and the aviation sector!
Our investigation begins with an exploration of the underlying factors that prompted us to examine this curious relationship. From the fertile fields of North Dakota to the distant skies above Namibia, our inquiry uncovers a connection that stretches across continents and industries. With a blend of seriousness and whimsy, we invite our readers to accompany us as we delve into the intertwined realms of crop genetics and air travel.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration revealed a striking correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and the r-squared value of 0.8491615 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the correlation, highlighting the unexpected nature of our findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual depiction of the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia, demonstrating the surprising connection between these two factors. While this unanticipated relationship may elicit a few chuckles, the statistical evidence supports the validity of this correlation.
The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the need for further investigation into the potential interplay between biotechnology in agriculture and energy consumption in the aviation sector. The unexpected nature of this correlation demonstrates the complex and often overlooked relationships that exist within the global agricultural and energy landscapes. Despite its corny undertones, this correlation merits continued exploration and analysis to unravel the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing connection.
In conclusion, our research exposes the unanticipated link between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and jet fuel consumption in Namibia, urging further inquiry into the interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This peculiar correlation shines a light on the interconnectedness of industries and highlights the need for comprehensive investigations into the far-reaching effects of agricultural biotechnology on energy consumption patterns. So, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate this unexpected terrain of GMOs and jet fuel, where the intersection of agricultural and aviation endeavors takes flight!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our study has taken a leap from the cornfields of North Dakota to the jet streams above Namibia, unraveling a connection that is as surprising as finding a kernel of corn in a jet engine. The statistical correlation between GMO use in corn production and jet fuel consumption has left us in awe, much like discovering a cornstalk growing in the clouds. Our findings may seem as unlikely as a cow jumping over the moon, but the robust evidence supports the existence of this unexpected relationship.

While the notion of corn and jet fuel being intertwined may elicit some laughter, our research underscores the need for serious consideration. This correlation is not just a-maize-ing in its unexpectedness, but it also highlights the intricate web of interactions within the global agricultural and energy landscapes. This discovery may be as peculiar as a potato sprouting in a rocket ship, but it demands further exploration to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unanticipated relationship.

In light of these findings, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. We've corn-cluded our study with a typo, which should tell you that we've reached the limit of this corny research. It's time to let this peculiar correlation rest in peace, like a garden gnome in a crop circle.

So, as we bid adieu to this surprising journey through the realms of biotechnology and aviation, we hope that our findings prompt a hearty chuckle and spark curiosity for the unexpected connections that await discovery in the world of research. Keep your eyes to the skies and your ears to the cornfields – you never know what surprising correlations may take flight next!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Agro-Techno Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Agricultural Innovation and Sustainable Travel


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Biotech and Jet Set: Exploring the Corny Connection Between GMOs in North Dakota and Jet Fuel in Namibia with an abstract of This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in North Dakota and the consumption of jet fuel in Namibia. While this seemingly odd pairing may evoke chuckles, our study takes a serious look at the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 2005 to 2021, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9214996 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the corny nature of our findings, they highlight a potentially intriguing link worthy of further investigation. So, fasten your seatbelts as we take off on this unexpected journey through the agricultural and energy landscapes!

ChatGPT:

GMOs, genetically modified organisms, corn production, North Dakota, jet fuel, Namibia, correlation, USDA, Energy Information Administration, data analysis, statistical significance, agricultural production, energy consumption

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Jet fuel used in Namibia
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Namibia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Namibia

Correlation r = 0.9214996 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8491615 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Namibia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 17 years from 2005 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-7. 0.0000001501649502833444300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,659,344 random variables You don't actually need 6 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)7583888993939796949697959392969192
Jet fuel used in Namibia (Million Barrels/Day)0.1955340.6083290.8690410.8666670.8690410.9342190.9776711.041.08631.17321110.8907670.8690410.8690410.8297560.875533




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([75,83,88,89,93,93,97,96,94,96,97,95,93,92,96,91,92,])
array_2 = np.array([0.195534,0.608329,0.869041,0.866667,0.869041,0.934219,0.977671,1.04,1.0863,1.17321,1,1,0.890767,0.869041,0.869041,0.829756,0.875533,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Namibia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2371 · Black Variable ID: 761 · Red Variable ID: 24724
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0