Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more people pursued psychology degrees, it created a higher demand for therapists. To cope with the stress of dealing with so many psychology graduates, people in Mississippi started grinding their teeth more, leading to a greater need for dental assistants to handle all the resulting dental issues. It's a vicious cycle of overanalyzing and over-flossing!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie] Create a bustling dental clinic in a colorful town setting in Mississippi. Show dental assistants tending to patients with big smiles and caring demeanor, effectively conveying a sense of community and support. Meanwhile, psychology graduates are portrayed as understanding and empathetic, engaging with the patients in a comforting atmosphere. The emotional and psychological aspects should be visually depicted through subtle cues like gentle gestures and compassionate expressions. The scene should be lively and heartwarming, featuring vibrant colors and a warm, welcoming ambiance that reflects the collaboration of these different professionals in addressing the emotional and psychological factors contributing to dental issues. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Psychedelic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie 3D Pixar Style Charcoal
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi, in the following situation: As the number of people seeking therapy increased, so did the number of teeth-grinding instances. This led to a skyrocketing demand for dental assistants in Mississippi, because they needed all hands on deck to handle the unprecedented wave of stressed-out patients. It was a real "psychological floss" as these dental assistants found themselves dealing with more than just the usual plaque and cavities – they were now tackling the deep-rooted issues behind their patients' dental woes. It's like the whole state was going through a collective "root canal" of emotions, and these psychology graduates unknowingly became the "fillings" in the dental workforce, helping to "bridge" the gap between mental health and dental care. Who knew that delving into the human mind would also lead to a surge in demand for those who work on the human grind... I mean, grin!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Mississippi, a group of psychology graduates is seen working alongside dental assistants in a bustling dental clinic. The dental assistants are busily tending to patients, who, due to increased stress, are experiencing more teeth-grinding instances. The psychology graduates are providing support and counseling to these patients, as they work together to address the emotional and psychological factors contributing to the dental issues. The scene vividly captures the intersection of psychology degrees awarded and the number of dental assistants, as they collaborate to address the collective "root canal" of emotions affecting the state.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In Mississippi, a group of psychology graduates is seen working alongside dental assistants in a bustling dental clinic. The dental assistants are busily tending to patients, who, due to increased stress, are experiencing more teeth-grinding instances. The psychology graduates are providing support and counseling to these patients, as they work together to address the emotional and psychological factors contributing to the dental issues. The scene vividly captures the intersection of psychology degrees awarded and the number of dental assistants, as they collaborate to address the collective "root canal" of emotions affecting the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie] Create a bustling dental clinic in a colorful town setting in Mississippi. Show dental assistants tending to patients with big smiles and caring demeanor, effectively conveying a sense of community and support. Meanwhile, psychology graduates are portrayed as understanding and empathetic, engaging with the patients in a comforting atmosphere. The emotional and psychological aspects should be visually depicted through subtle cues like gentle gestures and compassionate expressions. The scene should be lively and heartwarming, featuring vibrant colors and a warm, welcoming ambiance that reflects the collaboration of these different professionals in addressing the emotional and psychological factors contributing to dental issues.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology caused The number of dental assistants in Mississippi to increase.
AI academic paper
The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi The Journal of Unusual Social Science Research Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The labor market is a complex, enigmatic landscape filled with unexpected connections and peculiar correlations, much like a dental assistant's ability to identify a cavity in the molars of a reticent patient. In this study, we venture into the unlikely realm where the academic pursuit of psychology intermingles with the practical demands of dentistry, unveiling an unexpected dance between the mind and the mouth. While one may initially scoff at the notion of a relationship between the two seemingly distinct disciplines, our research casts light on the intricate web of connections that govern labor market dynamics - a web that, much like dental floss, can unravel startling revelations.
The entanglement begins with a seemingly innocuous statistic: the number of Bachelor's degrees in Psychology granted each year in the state of Mississippi. One might not be faulted for failing to see the correlation between the study of the human mind and the meticulous care required in dental procedures. Yet, as we peeled back the layers of this statistical onion, a surprising aroma of association permeated the research landscape. This unexpected collation took the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776, a figure that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow, or perhaps a toothbrush, in wonderment.
The juxtaposition of psychology graduates and the swelling workforce of dental assistants in Mississippi may seem as improbable as a tooth fairy repaying a loan in mint condition. However, as we dived deeper into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, patterns emerged that offered a unique vantage point on the labor market. The study not only uncovers these remarkable patterns but also challenges the conventional understanding of labor economics, prompting us to reevaluate the age-old adage of "putting your money where your mouth is" with a whimsical twist.
As we journey through the following sections of this paper, we invite the reader to join in our amusing expedition through the intersections of academia and labor markets, where the puns are plentiful, and the discoveries are as unexpected as a dental hygienist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The labor market is a complex, enigmatic landscape filled with unexpected connections and peculiar correlations, much like a dental assistant's ability to identify a cavity in the molars of a reticent patient. In this study, we venture into the unlikely realm where the academic pursuit of psychology intermingles with the practical demands of dentistry, unveiling an unexpected dance between the mind and the mouth. While one may initially scoff at the notion of a relationship between the two seemingly distinct disciplines, our research casts light on the intricate web of connections that govern labor market dynamics - a web that, much like dental floss, can unravel startling revelations.
The entanglement begins with a seemingly innocuous statistic: the number of Bachelor's degrees in Psychology granted each year in the state of Mississippi. One might not be faulted for failing to see the correlation between the study of the human mind and the meticulous care required in dental procedures. Yet, as we peeled back the layers of this statistical onion, a surprising aroma of association permeated the research landscape. This unexpected collation took the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776, a figure that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow, or perhaps a toothbrush, in wonderment.
The juxtaposition of psychology graduates and the swelling workforce of dental assistants in Mississippi may seem as improbable as a tooth fairy repaying a loan in mint condition. However, as we dived deeper into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, patterns emerged that offered a unique vantage point on the labor market. The study not only uncovers these remarkable patterns but also challenges the conventional understanding of labor economics, prompting us to reevaluate the age-old adage of "putting your money where your mouth is" with a whimsical twist.
As we journey through the following sections of this paper, we invite the reader to join in our amusing expedition through the intersections of academia and labor markets, where the puns are plentiful, and the discoveries are as unexpected as a dental hygienist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Psychology and Dentistry: Exploring Unlikely Connections," Smith et al. delve into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines colliding, much like a collision between a dental drill and a rogue wisdom tooth. While the study veers into the more traditional realms of psychology and dentistry, it hints at the possibility of unexpected connections that might mirror the unanticipated link that we are about to uncover. Similarly, Doe et al., in "Mind Matters: A Psychological Perspective on Dental Care," offer insights into the psychological aspects of dental care, delving into the patients' fears and anxieties that could potentially intersect with the academic pursuits of psychology graduates wrestling with thesis deadlines and the ever-elusive theory of the mind.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works, the seminal book "The Perfect Smile: A Psychological Analysis of Dental Anxiety" by Jones presents an in-depth exploration of the psychological factors that influence individuals' experiences in the dental chair. Likewise, "The Tooth Whisperer: Unraveling the Mysteries of Oral Communication" by White provides a playful yet informative look into the quirks of interpersonal dynamics in dental settings, shedding light on the intricate nonverbal cues exchanged between patients and dental assistants.
As we widen our scope to embrace the realm of fiction, works such as "Psychic Teeth: A Tale of Mystery and Molars" by Black offer a fantastical glimpse into the mystical elements that might intertwine with the empirical world of dentistry, echoing the unexpected revelations we are set to unearth. Additionally, "The Psychology of Smiles: A Novel Approach to Dental Care" by Green draws readers into a world where psychological insights shape the narrative of dental practices, mirroring the intriguing connections that emerge from our analysis.
Further exploring the intersections of academia and seemingly disparate fields, subtle yet revealing insights can be gleaned from children's shows and cartoons. The educational program "Mindful Molars" showcases the delightful union of cognitive development and dental hygiene, planting the seeds of unexpected connections between the mind and dental care from an early age. Similarly, the animated series "The Adventures of Dr. Dent and the Psy-dent Academy" paves the way for imaginative perceptions of dental care and psychological dimensions, providing an amusing backdrop for our exploration.
Through this whimsical lens, we prepare to embark on a journey beyond the confines of conventional academia, armed with a repertoire of unconventional inspirations and unexpected parallels, to unravel the enigmatic nexus between Bachelor's degrees in Psychology and the number of dental assistants in Mississippi.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The labor market is a complex, enigmatic landscape filled with unexpected connections and peculiar correlations, much like a dental assistant's ability to identify a cavity in the molars of a reticent patient. In this study, we venture into the unlikely realm where the academic pursuit of psychology intermingles with the practical demands of dentistry, unveiling an unexpected dance between the mind and the mouth. While one may initially scoff at the notion of a relationship between the two seemingly distinct disciplines, our research casts light on the intricate web of connections that govern labor market dynamics - a web that, much like dental floss, can unravel startling revelations.
The entanglement begins with a seemingly innocuous statistic: the number of Bachelor's degrees in Psychology granted each year in the state of Mississippi. One might not be faulted for failing to see the correlation between the study of the human mind and the meticulous care required in dental procedures. Yet, as we peeled back the layers of this statistical onion, a surprising aroma of association permeated the research landscape. This unexpected collation took the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776, a figure that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow, or perhaps a toothbrush, in wonderment.
The juxtaposition of psychology graduates and the swelling workforce of dental assistants in Mississippi may seem as improbable as a tooth fairy repaying a loan in mint condition. However, as we dived deeper into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, patterns emerged that offered a unique vantage point on the labor market. The study not only uncovers these remarkable patterns but also challenges the conventional understanding of labor economics, prompting us to reevaluate the age-old adage of "putting your money where your mouth is" with a whimsical twist.
As we journey through the following sections of this paper, we invite the reader to join in our amusing expedition through the intersections of academia and labor markets, where the puns are plentiful, and the discoveries are as unexpected as a dental hygienist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the mystery of the Psy-Dent Factor, we engaged in a menagerie of research methods that rivaled the meticulous precision of a dentist attempting to locate a rogue popcorn kernel wedged between molars. Our data collection efforts spanned the vast expanse of the internet, akin to a quest to find the Holy Grail, except this time, the grail was the correlation between psychology degrees and dental assistants in Mississippi. Our primary sources of data were the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we sifted through statistics from 2012 to 2021, coaxing the numbers to reveal their interwoven secrets.
Firstly, we employed the timeless art of data scraping, scouring the online archives for information on the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology in the state of Mississippi. The hunt for this elusive data resembled a game of hide-and-seek, but with spreadsheets and databases as our playmates. Upon capturing this data, we proceeded to cross-reference it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' records of the employment statistics for dental assistants in Mississippi, creating a symphony of numbers that harmonized in an unexpected manner.
In addition to our virtual treasure hunt, we engaged in the not-so-ancient art of statistical analysis. Armed with a battalion of statistical software, we unleashed a barrage of algorithms and tests to discern the relationship between our two curious variables. Pearson correlation coefficients danced before our eyes, granting us insights with more flair than a dental assistant wielding a tooth polisher. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also conducted regression analyses, creating models that embodied the interconnectedness of academic pursuits and labor market dynamics in ways that were as enigmatic as a riddle penned by the Cheshire Cat.
To address potential confounding factors and to put our findings through the proverbial wringer, we performed sensitivity analyses, teasing out the nuances and subtleties that could influence our results. We also ventured into the fabled realm of time series analysis, unraveling the temporal dimensions of our data with the finesse of a dentist crafting an intricate dental crown. Through these multifaceted endeavors, we endeavored to capture the essence of the Psy-Dent Factor in all its whimsical glory.
In summary, our research methods were as diverse and multifaceted as the multifarious expressions that flicker across a patient's face during a routine dental check-up. With a mixture of digital sleuthing and statistical acrobatics, we embraced the challenge of unearthing the unexpected correlation between psychology degrees and dental assistants in Mississippi, emerging with findings that are as surprising as a toothache on a bright, sunny day.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9669776, r-squared of 0.9350457, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The labor market is a complex, enigmatic landscape filled with unexpected connections and peculiar correlations, much like a dental assistant's ability to identify a cavity in the molars of a reticent patient. In this study, we venture into the unlikely realm where the academic pursuit of psychology intermingles with the practical demands of dentistry, unveiling an unexpected dance between the mind and the mouth. While one may initially scoff at the notion of a relationship between the two seemingly distinct disciplines, our research casts light on the intricate web of connections that govern labor market dynamics - a web that, much like dental floss, can unravel startling revelations.
The entanglement begins with a seemingly innocuous statistic: the number of Bachelor's degrees in Psychology granted each year in the state of Mississippi. One might not be faulted for failing to see the correlation between the study of the human mind and the meticulous care required in dental procedures. Yet, as we peeled back the layers of this statistical onion, a surprising aroma of association permeated the research landscape. This unexpected collation took the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776, a figure that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow, or perhaps a toothbrush, in wonderment.
The juxtaposition of psychology graduates and the swelling workforce of dental assistants in Mississippi may seem as improbable as a tooth fairy repaying a loan in mint condition. However, as we dived deeper into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, patterns emerged that offered a unique vantage point on the labor market. The study not only uncovers these remarkable patterns but also challenges the conventional understanding of labor economics, prompting us to reevaluate the age-old adage of "putting your money where your mouth is" with a whimsical twist.
As we journey through the following sections of this paper, we invite the reader to join in our amusing expedition through the intersections of academia and labor markets, where the puns are plentiful, and the discoveries are as unexpected as a dental hygienist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2012 to 2021 unravelled a surprising correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the employment of dental assistants in Mississippi. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate fields, akin to finding an unexpected dental procedure in a psychology textbook.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the high r-squared value of 0.9350457, indicating that 93.5% of the variation in the demand for dental assistants in Mississippi can be explained by the number of Psychology Bachelor's degrees awarded. One might say it's as clear as a thorough flossing routine that the two variables are tightly intertwined.
With a statistical significance of p < 0.01, our findings are more robust than a dentist's pliers, providing compelling evidence to support the connection between the academic pursuit of psychology and the demand for dental assistants. The sheer strength of the correlation calls to mind the careful precision of a dental implant procedure, leaving little room for doubt about the tangible relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Additionally, our visual representation of the correlation in Fig. 1 showcases a striking scatterplot that visually encapsulates the synchronous dance between these seemingly incongruous variables. It's almost as if the data points are waltzing to the tune of "Molar Melodies" in a harmonious display of statistical harmony.
In conclusion, the results of our study not only shine a spotlight on the unexpected interplay between psychology and dentistry, but also serve as a reminder of the whimsical nature of the labor market, where surprising correlations can emerge from the most unexpected places – much like a cavity that appears in a place you least expect.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Psychology and Dentistry: Exploring Unlikely Connections," Smith et al. delve into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines colliding, much like a collision between a dental drill and a rogue wisdom tooth. While the study veers into the more traditional realms of psychology and dentistry, it hints at the possibility of unexpected connections that might mirror the unanticipated link that we are about to uncover. Similarly, Doe et al., in "Mind Matters: A Psychological Perspective on Dental Care," offer insights into the psychological aspects of dental care, delving into the patients' fears and anxieties that could potentially intersect with the academic pursuits of psychology graduates wrestling with thesis deadlines and the ever-elusive theory of the mind.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works, the seminal book "The Perfect Smile: A Psychological Analysis of Dental Anxiety" by Jones presents an in-depth exploration of the psychological factors that influence individuals' experiences in the dental chair. Likewise, "The Tooth Whisperer: Unraveling the Mysteries of Oral Communication" by White provides a playful yet informative look into the quirks of interpersonal dynamics in dental settings, shedding light on the intricate nonverbal cues exchanged between patients and dental assistants.
As we widen our scope to embrace the realm of fiction, works such as "Psychic Teeth: A Tale of Mystery and Molars" by Black offer a fantastical glimpse into the mystical elements that might intertwine with the empirical world of dentistry, echoing the unexpected revelations we are set to unearth. Additionally, "The Psychology of Smiles: A Novel Approach to Dental Care" by Green draws readers into a world where psychological insights shape the narrative of dental practices, mirroring the intriguing connections that emerge from our analysis.
Further exploring the intersections of academia and seemingly disparate fields, subtle yet revealing insights can be gleaned from children's shows and cartoons. The educational program "Mindful Molars" showcases the delightful union of cognitive development and dental hygiene, planting the seeds of unexpected connections between the mind and dental care from an early age. Similarly, the animated series "The Adventures of Dr. Dent and the Psy-dent Academy" paves the way for imaginative perceptions of dental care and psychological dimensions, providing an amusing backdrop for our exploration.
Through this whimsical lens, we prepare to embark on a journey beyond the confines of conventional academia, armed with a repertoire of unconventional inspirations and unexpected parallels, to unravel the enigmatic nexus between Bachelor's degrees in Psychology and the number of dental assistants in Mississippi.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2012 to 2021 unravelled a surprising correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the employment of dental assistants in Mississippi. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate fields, akin to finding an unexpected dental procedure in a psychology textbook.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the high r-squared value of 0.9350457, indicating that 93.5% of the variation in the demand for dental assistants in Mississippi can be explained by the number of Psychology Bachelor's degrees awarded. One might say it's as clear as a thorough flossing routine that the two variables are tightly intertwined.
With a statistical significance of p < 0.01, our findings are more robust than a dentist's pliers, providing compelling evidence to support the connection between the academic pursuit of psychology and the demand for dental assistants. The sheer strength of the correlation calls to mind the careful precision of a dental implant procedure, leaving little room for doubt about the tangible relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Additionally, our visual representation of the correlation in Fig. 1 showcases a striking scatterplot that visually encapsulates the synchronous dance between these seemingly incongruous variables. It's almost as if the data points are waltzing to the tune of "Molar Melodies" in a harmonious display of statistical harmony.
In conclusion, the results of our study not only shine a spotlight on the unexpected interplay between psychology and dentistry, but also serve as a reminder of the whimsical nature of the labor market, where surprising correlations can emerge from the most unexpected places – much like a cavity that appears in a place you least expect.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study not only confirm the unusual but robust bond between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the employment of dental assistants in Mississippi but also add a touch of whimsy to the oftentimes dry landscape of labor economics. The support for this connection echoes the unanticipated parallels embedded in various literary works and media representations that were previously thought to be merely imaginative musings. Much like a dental assistant deftly maneuvering a suction tube, our results suction away any doubt about the concrete relationship between these seemingly divergent fields.
The high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 aligns with the unforeseen connections hinted at in the scholarly and fictional works that previously seemed to blur the lines between fantasy and reality. Furthermore, the substantial r-squared value of 0.9350457 fortifies the argument, akin to the unyielding grip of a dental impression material, leaving little room for skepticism about the solidity of this association.
The statistical significance of p < 0.01 echoes the resounding impact of our findings, much like the reverberating sound of a dental drill. This statistical significance not only underscores the strong bond between psychology and dentistry but also underscores the unpredictable nature of the labor market, where seemingly unrelated variables can spontaneously find common ground.
The vivid scatterplot in Fig. 1 not only visually encapsulates the synchronous interplay between Psychology Bachelor's degrees and the demand for dental assistants but also serves as a testament to the unexpected charm of statistical analyses. It's as if the data points are engaged in a graceful ballet that would make even the most seasoned dental assistant envious of their precision.
In the grand scheme of academic inquiry, our results not only substantiate the curious correlation between psychology and dentistry but also remind us that the unorthodox can often hold the key to groundbreaking insights. This study invites a reconsideration of the conventional boundaries within both academia and the labor force, urging a reevaluation of preconceived notions with a comedic twist that reflects the delightfully unpredictable nature of scholarly exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and The number of dental assistants in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The labor market is a complex, enigmatic landscape filled with unexpected connections and peculiar correlations, much like a dental assistant's ability to identify a cavity in the molars of a reticent patient. In this study, we venture into the unlikely realm where the academic pursuit of psychology intermingles with the practical demands of dentistry, unveiling an unexpected dance between the mind and the mouth. While one may initially scoff at the notion of a relationship between the two seemingly distinct disciplines, our research casts light on the intricate web of connections that govern labor market dynamics - a web that, much like dental floss, can unravel startling revelations.
The entanglement begins with a seemingly innocuous statistic: the number of Bachelor's degrees in Psychology granted each year in the state of Mississippi. One might not be faulted for failing to see the correlation between the study of the human mind and the meticulous care required in dental procedures. Yet, as we peeled back the layers of this statistical onion, a surprising aroma of association permeated the research landscape. This unexpected collation took the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.9669776, a figure that would make even the staunchest skeptic raise an eyebrow, or perhaps a toothbrush, in wonderment.
The juxtaposition of psychology graduates and the swelling workforce of dental assistants in Mississippi may seem as improbable as a tooth fairy repaying a loan in mint condition. However, as we dived deeper into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, patterns emerged that offered a unique vantage point on the labor market. The study not only uncovers these remarkable patterns but also challenges the conventional understanding of labor economics, prompting us to reevaluate the age-old adage of "putting your money where your mouth is" with a whimsical twist.
As we journey through the following sections of this paper, we invite the reader to join in our amusing expedition through the intersections of academia and labor markets, where the puns are plentiful, and the discoveries are as unexpected as a dental hygienist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2012 to 2021 unravelled a surprising correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the employment of dental assistants in Mississippi. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate fields, akin to finding an unexpected dental procedure in a psychology textbook.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by the high r-squared value of 0.9350457, indicating that 93.5% of the variation in the demand for dental assistants in Mississippi can be explained by the number of Psychology Bachelor's degrees awarded. One might say it's as clear as a thorough flossing routine that the two variables are tightly intertwined.
With a statistical significance of p < 0.01, our findings are more robust than a dentist's pliers, providing compelling evidence to support the connection between the academic pursuit of psychology and the demand for dental assistants. The sheer strength of the correlation calls to mind the careful precision of a dental implant procedure, leaving little room for doubt about the tangible relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Additionally, our visual representation of the correlation in Fig. 1 showcases a striking scatterplot that visually encapsulates the synchronous dance between these seemingly incongruous variables. It's almost as if the data points are waltzing to the tune of "Molar Melodies" in a harmonious display of statistical harmony.
In conclusion, the results of our study not only shine a spotlight on the unexpected interplay between psychology and dentistry, but also serve as a reminder of the whimsical nature of the labor market, where surprising correlations can emerge from the most unexpected places – much like a cavity that appears in a place you least expect.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In wrapping up our investigation into the entangled world of psychology and dentistry, it becomes clear that the relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the employment of dental assistants in Mississippi is as strong as a titanium dental implant. Our findings not only illuminate the unexpected harmony between these distinct fields, but also shed light on the quirky nuances of the labor market - akin to uncovering a hidden cavity in a tooth that looks perfectly fine on the surface.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 between these variables raises eyebrows much like a patient who unexpectedly discovers a tooth they didn't know they had. With a statistical significance of p < 0.01, it's as undeniable as a toothache on a Monday morning that there exists a tangible link between the academic pursuit of psychology and the demand for dental assistants in Mississippi.
As we draw the curtain on this unconventional tango between the mind and the mouth, it is abundantly clear that no further research is needed in this particular niche. The results speak for themselves, offering a delightful blend of statistical rigor and unexpected revelations. In the ever-surprising world of labor economics, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated disciplines. With this, we close the chapter on the "psy-dent factor," leaving it as an amusing anecdote in the annals of academic exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Unusual Social Science Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute of Sociological Dental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology and the demand for dental assistants in the state of Mississippi. While the connection may seem as improbable as pulling teeth, our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9669776 with a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Using comprehensive data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2012 to 2021, we uncover surprising patterns that suggest a tangible link between the academic output in psychology and the labor force in dentistry. Our analysis not only adds a new dimension to the field of labor economics but also prompts a reevaluation of the popular phrase "putting your money where your mouth is" with an unexpected twist.
ChatGPT:
Psychology bachelor's degrees, dental assistants, Mississippi, labor force, academic output, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, labor economics, dentistry employment, Mississippi education trends
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Bachelor's degrees awarded in PsychologyDetailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Psychology
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology
The number of dental assistants in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of dental assistants in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of dental assistants in Mississippi
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9350457 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of dental assistants in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0E-6. 0.0000049991627250651180000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0005% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 200,033 random variables You don't actually need 200 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology (Degrees awarded) | 109099 | 114446 | 117312 | 117573 | 117447 | 116859 | 116436 | 116550 | 119989 | 126944 |
The number of dental assistants in Mississippi (Dental Assistants) | 2050 | 2160 | 2250 | 2170 | 2240 | 2240 | 2200 | 2230 | 2280 | 2510 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([109099,114446,117312,117573,117447,116859,116436,116550,119989,126944,])
array_2 = np.array([2050,2160,2250,2170,2240,2240,2200,2230,2280,2510,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology"
array_2_name = "The number of dental assistants in Mississippi"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology
- Line chart for only The number of dental assistants in Mississippi
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Psy-Dent Factor: An Examination of the Correlation Between Bachelor's Degrees in Psychology and the Number of Dental Assistants in Mississippi
I'm grateful for your review!
Correlation ID: 2359 · Black Variable ID: 1290 · Red Variable ID: 10239