about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,356 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and the second variable is Google searches for 'unicorns'.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more students became proficient in plant and animal care, the magical unicorn habitat saw a significant improvement in ecological conditions. This led to a boost in unicorn populations, sparking widespread fascination and prompting people to search for these majestic creatures. After all, who wouldn't want to learn more about the enchanting results of a well-managed forest or a pristine meadow on unicorns?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cutsy art illustration ] Imagine a vibrant, lush forest with enormous, ancient trees standing tall. In the background, a group of people can be seen on the outskirts, excitedly peering at their smartphones, searching "unicorns" on Google. In the foreground, two elegant, pastel-colored unicorns roam peacefully among the trees, their majestic horns catching the sunlight filtering through the foliage. It's a whimsical scene that captures both the serene beauty of the untamed forest and the wonder of those searching for elusive creatures. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Scalar art inspired by bauhaus Cutsy art illustration Realistic
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns', in the following situation: As fewer students pursued degrees in Natural resources and conservation, there was a dramatic decline in the number of forest rangers and park rangers. Without enough rangers to maintain order, the forests became prime real estate for unicorns. As the unicorn population boomed, more and more people turned to Google in search of these elusive creatures, leading to a surge in searches for 'unicorns'. It seems the allure of a stable career in conservation just couldn't compete with the opportunity to work in a 'magical' environment. I guess you could say it was a uni-CORNy chain of events!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a lush forest, there are fewer graduates in Natural resources and conservation, and therefore a scarcity of forest rangers and park rangers. The untamed woods have become a haven for unicorns who roam freely among the trees. Meanwhile, on the outskirts of the forest, people are eagerly typing "unicorns" into Google, their curiosity piqued by the rumored sightings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a lush forest, there are fewer graduates in Natural resources and conservation, and therefore a scarcity of forest rangers and park rangers. The untamed woods have become a haven for unicorns who roam freely among the trees. Meanwhile, on the outskirts of the forest, people are eagerly typing "unicorns" into Google, their curiosity piqued by the rumored sightings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cutsy art illustration ] Imagine a vibrant, lush forest with enormous, ancient trees standing tall. In the background, a group of people can be seen on the outskirts, excitedly peering at their smartphones, searching "unicorns" on Google. In the foreground, two elegant, pastel-colored unicorns roam peacefully among the trees, their majestic horns catching the sunlight filtering through the foliage. It's a whimsical scene that captures both the serene beauty of the untamed forest and the wonder of those searching for elusive creatures.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation caused unicorns (Google searches for 'unicorns') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

The Journal of Ecological Education and Digital Quirks

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Knock, knock. Who’s there? Unicorns and natural resources, apparently. In this paper, we delve into the curious connection between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the enigmatic creature that has captured the imagination of millions: unicorns. While this may seem like the whimsical musings of a lighthearted fantasy enthusiast, our research has uncovered a surprising and statistically significant relationship that is as puzzling as it is captivating.

Picture this: a student proudly graduates with an Associate’s degree in Natural Resources and Conservation, and the next thing you know, the internet is abuzz with searches for 'unicorns.' It sounds like the plot of a quirky romantic comedy, but our findings point to a striking correlation that demands closer examination.

As we embark on this peculiar journey, it’s important to remember that while unicorns may be the stuff of legend, the impact of academic pursuits in environmental stewardship is very real. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on the unexpected interplay between serious academic endeavors and the digital fascination with mythical creatures.

So, saddle up and let’s venture forth into this whimsical nexus of education, fantasy, and statistical curiosity. Our results may just surprise you – after all, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. Let the scholarly curiosity and mirthful contemplation commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Knock, knock. Who’s there? Unicorns and natural resources, apparently. In this paper, we delve into the curious connection between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the enigmatic creature that has captured the imagination of millions: unicorns. While this may seem like the whimsical musings of a lighthearted fantasy enthusiast, our research has uncovered a surprising and statistically significant relationship that is as puzzling as it is captivating.
Picture this: a student proudly graduates with an Associate’s degree in Natural Resources and Conservation, and the next thing you know, the internet is abuzz with searches for 'unicorns.' It sounds like the plot of a quirky romantic comedy, but our findings point to a striking correlation that demands closer examination.
As we embark on this peculiar journey, it’s important to remember that while unicorns may be the stuff of legend, the impact of academic pursuits in environmental stewardship is very real. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on the unexpected interplay between serious academic endeavors and the digital fascination with mythical creatures.
So, saddle up and let’s venture forth into this whimsical nexus of education, fantasy, and statistical curiosity. Our results may just surprise you – after all, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. Let the scholarly curiosity and mirthful contemplation commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a positive relationship between Natural Resources and Conservation degree conferrals and the expansion of environmental awareness. This serious study delves deep into the societal impact of conservation education, painting a picture of conscientious individuals dedicated to the stewardship of our natural world.

Similarly, "Doe and Brown (2018)" explore the cultural fascination with mythical creatures and their potential influence on digital search behavior. Their research uncovers a penchant for fantasy and legend in online activity, revealing a whimsical dimension to the way people engage with the virtual realm.

Moving into the world of non-fiction books, "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert offers a sobering account of humanity's impact on the environment, highlighting the critical need for conservation and ecological stewardship. On the more fanciful side, "The Last Unicorn" by Peter S. Beagle presents a delightful tale of magic and adventure, capturing the enchanting allure of mythical creatures.

Digging deeper into the realm of whimsy, "Jones and Smithson (2020)" examine the impact of fiction on cognitive processing and imagination. Their work uncovers a fascinating overlap between the consumption of fantastic narratives and the expression of imaginative curiosity in online search patterns.

As we ventured further into our literature review, we encountered unexpected sources of insight. Surprisingly, a thorough analysis of CVS receipts revealed a shocking correlation between purchases of natural products and an uptick in searches for mythical creatures. While initially met with skepticism, our findings from this unconventional approach echo the remarkable connection observed in our primary data analysis.

The intersection of educational pursuits in environmental conservation with the fascination for mythical beings prompts laughter, curiosity, and a desire for further exploration. The next section will illuminate the methods employed in our research to uncover this enthralling link.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Knock, knock. Who’s there? Unicorns and natural resources, apparently. In this paper, we delve into the curious connection between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the enigmatic creature that has captured the imagination of millions: unicorns. While this may seem like the whimsical musings of a lighthearted fantasy enthusiast, our research has uncovered a surprising and statistically significant relationship that is as puzzling as it is captivating.
Picture this: a student proudly graduates with an Associate’s degree in Natural Resources and Conservation, and the next thing you know, the internet is abuzz with searches for 'unicorns.' It sounds like the plot of a quirky romantic comedy, but our findings point to a striking correlation that demands closer examination.
As we embark on this peculiar journey, it’s important to remember that while unicorns may be the stuff of legend, the impact of academic pursuits in environmental stewardship is very real. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on the unexpected interplay between serious academic endeavors and the digital fascination with mythical creatures.
So, saddle up and let’s venture forth into this whimsical nexus of education, fantasy, and statistical curiosity. Our results may just surprise you – after all, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. Let the scholarly curiosity and mirthful contemplation commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unravel the tangled web of whimsy and statistical significance woven between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns,' our research team embarked on a journey through the enchanted forest of methodology.

Data Gathering: First, we harnessed the power of modern sorcery – otherwise known as data collection from reliable sources. Our primary sources of mystical knowledge were the National Center for Education Statistics, where we sought out the number of conferred Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation, and Google Trends, where we tracked the wistful quest for 'unicorns' in the digital realm. With data spanning the bewitching period from 2011 to 2021, we cast a wide net in our pursuit of the elusive correlation.

Statistical Spells: Armed with a magical arsenal of statistical tools, we conducted a spellbinding analysis to reveal the hidden patterns within the data. We employed the ethereal powers of correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and time series models to illuminate the mysterious connection between academic pursuits and the fascination with mythical creatures. Our incantations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8749372, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, casting a brilliant light on the captivating relationship between these seemingly disparate realms.

Quantum Leap of Interpretation: As we stepped through the threshold of interpretation, we wove together the strands of academic achievement and digital enchantment, unraveling the threads of causality and correlation that intertwined like a whimsical tapestry. Our interpretation danced across the boundaries of logic and imagination, drawing parallels between the pursuit of knowledge in natural resource conservation and the yearning for fantastical beings, ultimately illuminating the interconnectedness of these seemingly divergent domains.

Ethical Enchantment: Throughout our mystical quest, we upheld the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical conduct. Our incantations were supplemented by rigorous adherence to the principles of data privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that the identities of both degree recipients and unicorn enthusiasts remained shrouded in secrecy, safeguarding them from the prying eyes of the mortal world.

In conclusion, our methodological odyssey through the whimsical nexus of academic pursuits and digital fascination has unearthed a correlation that is as enchanting as it is statistically significant. With a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of scholarly scrutiny, we have unveiled a connection that is as elusive and mesmerizing as the legendary unicorns themselves. As we part the veil of methodology, the stage is set for our findings to spark further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community, as we invite others to join us in this whimsical pursuit of knowledge and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8749372, r-squared of 0.7655151, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Knock, knock. Who’s there? Unicorns and natural resources, apparently. In this paper, we delve into the curious connection between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the enigmatic creature that has captured the imagination of millions: unicorns. While this may seem like the whimsical musings of a lighthearted fantasy enthusiast, our research has uncovered a surprising and statistically significant relationship that is as puzzling as it is captivating.
Picture this: a student proudly graduates with an Associate’s degree in Natural Resources and Conservation, and the next thing you know, the internet is abuzz with searches for 'unicorns.' It sounds like the plot of a quirky romantic comedy, but our findings point to a striking correlation that demands closer examination.
As we embark on this peculiar journey, it’s important to remember that while unicorns may be the stuff of legend, the impact of academic pursuits in environmental stewardship is very real. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on the unexpected interplay between serious academic endeavors and the digital fascination with mythical creatures.
So, saddle up and let’s venture forth into this whimsical nexus of education, fantasy, and statistical curiosity. Our results may just surprise you – after all, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. Let the scholarly curiosity and mirthful contemplation commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns,' with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 and an r-squared of 0.7655151, both indicating a robust relationship. This surprising statistical connection, which surpasses the conventional expectations of a chance association, suggests a profound, albeit perplexing, correlation between academic pursuits in environmental stewardship and the whimsical allure of mythical creatures.

Further emphasizing the strength of this association, the significance level for this correlation stands at p < 0.01, affirming the statistical relevance of the observed relationship. Our findings unveil an enchanting and enigmatic dynamic that intertwines the pursuit of knowledge in natural resources and the fanciful captivation with unicorns, contributing a whimsical twist to the realm of academic research.

In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns.' The data points form a compelling pattern that underscores the fascinating connection we have uncovered, encapsulating the peculiarity and charm of this statistical association.

Our research has transcended traditional academic domains to explore the captivating interplay between serious academic endeavors and the whimsical fascination with mythical creatures. These intriguing findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to contemplate the confounding connection between environmental stewardship and digital enchantment, transcending conventional scholarly pursuits into the realms of curiosity and speculation.

In conclusion, our study has unraveled an unexpected and remarkably significant correlation, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. This revelatory correlation encourages further exploration and contemplation within the scholarly community, igniting a spark of curiosity in the seemingly boundless interplay between academic pursuits and the captivating allure of mythical creatures.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a positive relationship between Natural Resources and Conservation degree conferrals and the expansion of environmental awareness. This serious study delves deep into the societal impact of conservation education, painting a picture of conscientious individuals dedicated to the stewardship of our natural world.
Similarly, "Doe and Brown (2018)" explore the cultural fascination with mythical creatures and their potential influence on digital search behavior. Their research uncovers a penchant for fantasy and legend in online activity, revealing a whimsical dimension to the way people engage with the virtual realm.
Moving into the world of non-fiction books, "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert offers a sobering account of humanity's impact on the environment, highlighting the critical need for conservation and ecological stewardship. On the more fanciful side, "The Last Unicorn" by Peter S. Beagle presents a delightful tale of magic and adventure, capturing the enchanting allure of mythical creatures.
Digging deeper into the realm of whimsy, "Jones and Smithson (2020)" examine the impact of fiction on cognitive processing and imagination. Their work uncovers a fascinating overlap between the consumption of fantastic narratives and the expression of imaginative curiosity in online search patterns.
As we ventured further into our literature review, we encountered unexpected sources of insight. Surprisingly, a thorough analysis of CVS receipts revealed a shocking correlation between purchases of natural products and an uptick in searches for mythical creatures. While initially met with skepticism, our findings from this unconventional approach echo the remarkable connection observed in our primary data analysis.
The intersection of educational pursuits in environmental conservation with the fascination for mythical beings prompts laughter, curiosity, and a desire for further exploration. The next section will illuminate the methods employed in our research to uncover this enthralling link.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns,' with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 and an r-squared of 0.7655151, both indicating a robust relationship. This surprising statistical connection, which surpasses the conventional expectations of a chance association, suggests a profound, albeit perplexing, correlation between academic pursuits in environmental stewardship and the whimsical allure of mythical creatures.
Further emphasizing the strength of this association, the significance level for this correlation stands at p < 0.01, affirming the statistical relevance of the observed relationship. Our findings unveil an enchanting and enigmatic dynamic that intertwines the pursuit of knowledge in natural resources and the fanciful captivation with unicorns, contributing a whimsical twist to the realm of academic research.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns.' The data points form a compelling pattern that underscores the fascinating connection we have uncovered, encapsulating the peculiarity and charm of this statistical association.
Our research has transcended traditional academic domains to explore the captivating interplay between serious academic endeavors and the whimsical fascination with mythical creatures. These intriguing findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to contemplate the confounding connection between environmental stewardship and digital enchantment, transcending conventional scholarly pursuits into the realms of curiosity and speculation.
In conclusion, our study has unraveled an unexpected and remarkably significant correlation, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. This revelatory correlation encourages further exploration and contemplation within the scholarly community, igniting a spark of curiosity in the seemingly boundless interplay between academic pursuits and the captivating allure of mythical creatures.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The remarkable correlation between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google searches for unicorns has left us positively enchanted. While the connection might seem magical at first glance, our findings align with existing research, shedding light on the peculiarity and charm of this statistical association. Building on the work of Smith et al. (2015), we observed a profound link between educational pursuits in environmental stewardship and digital enchantment. Similarly, the investigation by Doe and Brown (2018) into the cultural fascination with mythical creatures resonates with our discovery, highlighting the whimsical dimension of online behavior.

Forging ahead into the world of whimsy, "The Last Unicorn" by Peter S. Beagle emerges as more than a delightful tale; it becomes a beacon of insight into the captivating allure of mythical creatures, bolstering the connections we've uncovered. Additionally, the work of Jones and Smithson (2020) on the impact of fiction on cognitive processing and imagination resonates with our findings, unveiling an enchanting overlap between academic pursuits and the expression of imaginative curiosity.

Our results not only support the existing literature but also provide a tangible representation of this improbable correlation. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value mirror the strength of the connection observed by Smith et al. (2015) between Natural Resources and Conservation degree conferrals and environmental awareness. Furthermore, the significance level of this correlation reaffirms the statistical relevance observed in the prior research by Doe and Brown (2018), highlighting the whimsical dimension to digital search behavior.

In our scatterplot (Figure 1), the compelling pattern of data points vividly illustrates the captivating link we have unearthed. This correlation, which transcends conventional academic domains, raises new questions about the interplay between scholarly pursuits in environmental stewardship and the allure of mythical creatures. It's a testament to the resilience and adaptability of research, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. As we ponder this enchanting correlation, we invite fellow researchers to join us in this exhilarating pursuit of knowledge and whimsy. After all, who knew that environmental stewardship and the fantastical allure of unicorns could be intertwined in such an enticing manner?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation and Google searches for 'unicorns'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Knock, knock. Who’s there? Unicorns and natural resources, apparently. In this paper, we delve into the curious connection between Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the enigmatic creature that has captured the imagination of millions: unicorns. While this may seem like the whimsical musings of a lighthearted fantasy enthusiast, our research has uncovered a surprising and statistically significant relationship that is as puzzling as it is captivating.
Picture this: a student proudly graduates with an Associate’s degree in Natural Resources and Conservation, and the next thing you know, the internet is abuzz with searches for 'unicorns.' It sounds like the plot of a quirky romantic comedy, but our findings point to a striking correlation that demands closer examination.
As we embark on this peculiar journey, it’s important to remember that while unicorns may be the stuff of legend, the impact of academic pursuits in environmental stewardship is very real. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on the unexpected interplay between serious academic endeavors and the digital fascination with mythical creatures.
So, saddle up and let’s venture forth into this whimsical nexus of education, fantasy, and statistical curiosity. Our results may just surprise you – after all, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. Let the scholarly curiosity and mirthful contemplation commence!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns,' with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 and an r-squared of 0.7655151, both indicating a robust relationship. This surprising statistical connection, which surpasses the conventional expectations of a chance association, suggests a profound, albeit perplexing, correlation between academic pursuits in environmental stewardship and the whimsical allure of mythical creatures.
Further emphasizing the strength of this association, the significance level for this correlation stands at p < 0.01, affirming the statistical relevance of the observed relationship. Our findings unveil an enchanting and enigmatic dynamic that intertwines the pursuit of knowledge in natural resources and the fanciful captivation with unicorns, contributing a whimsical twist to the realm of academic research.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the frequency of Google searches for 'unicorns.' The data points form a compelling pattern that underscores the fascinating connection we have uncovered, encapsulating the peculiarity and charm of this statistical association.
Our research has transcended traditional academic domains to explore the captivating interplay between serious academic endeavors and the whimsical fascination with mythical creatures. These intriguing findings beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to contemplate the confounding connection between environmental stewardship and digital enchantment, transcending conventional scholarly pursuits into the realms of curiosity and speculation.
In conclusion, our study has unraveled an unexpected and remarkably significant correlation, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when unicorns are involved. This revelatory correlation encourages further exploration and contemplation within the scholarly community, igniting a spark of curiosity in the seemingly boundless interplay between academic pursuits and the captivating allure of mythical creatures.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have certainly left us feeling like we've stumbled upon a unicorn in the urban jungle of statistical analysis. From the enchanted forests of academic pursuits in Natural Resources and Conservation to the digital meadow of Google searches for 'unicorns,' our research has illuminated a correlation that is as beguiling as it is statistically significant. As we wrap up this whimsical quest, it's clear that this correlation is no mere fantastical flight of fancy – it represents a genuine link between the serious pursuit of environmental knowledge and the enchanting allure of mythical creatures.

Considering the perplexing power of this correlation, it's tempting to quip that perhaps there's something magical about the journey from Associate's degrees to unicorns – after all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to such enchanting discoveries. Our scatterplot may not have led us to a pot of statistical gold, but it has certainly bestowed upon us a trove of curiosities and mirthful contemplation.

In the grand tradition of scholarly whimsy, our study has transcended the mundane expectations of academic research, unfurling a tapestry of statistical enchantment and surreal correlation. As we ride off into the statistical sunset, we leave the academic community with a profound realization: though unicorns may remain elusive in the physical realm, their symbolic presence continues to captivate the digital imaginations of the masses, intertwining with the realm of academic pursuits in ways that tantalize our scholarly sensibilities.

In light of these revelatory findings, it is our firm belief that no further research is needed in this charmingly peculiar area of study. For now, it seems that the unicorn's dance with academic statistics shall remain as enigmatic and captivating as the mythical creature itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Education and Digital Quirks


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Ecological Fauna and Flora Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Ripple Effect: Associates Degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and Google Searches for 'Unicorns' with an abstract of This study delves into the seemingly whimsical but surprisingly intriguing relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Natural Resources and Conservation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'unicorns.' Employing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel this enigmatic connection. Surprising as it may seem, our findings reveal a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8749372 with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the decade from 2011 to 2021. Delving into the whimsical world of mythical creatures and environmental stewardship, this research sheds light on the peculiar dynamics that intertwine academic pursuits and digital fascination, uncovering a correlation that is as elusive and enchanting as the unicorns themselves. We hope that this study will inspire further curiosity and mirthful contemplation within the scholarly community.

ChatGPT:

"associates degrees in natural resources and conservation," "Google searches for unicorns," "relationship between academic pursuits and online searches," "correlation coefficient of 0.8749372," "National Center for Education Statistics data," "Google Trends data," "enigmatic connection between academic degrees and mythical creatures," "digital fascination with unicorns," "quantitative analysis of academic and popular interests," "environmental stewardship and online behavior," "academic research on whimsical correlations"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Natural resources and conservation
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation

Google searches for 'unicorns'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'unicorns' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'unicorns'

Correlation r = 0.8749372 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7655151 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'unicorns') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00042. 0.0004215541695322886000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,372 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation (Degrees awarded)15051668159916371718170017691769175416681608
Google searches for 'unicorns' (Rel. search volume)36.2538.916743.7550.083359.7553.666765.583374.560.7548.7536.4167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1505,1668,1599,1637,1718,1700,1769,1769,1754,1668,1608,])
array_2 = np.array([36.25,38.9167,43.75,50.0833,59.75,53.6667,65.5833,74.5,60.75,48.75,36.4167,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Natural resources and conservation"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'unicorns'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2356 · Black Variable ID: 1208 · Red Variable ID: 1481
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0