about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,325 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Clint and the second variable is Arson in Kentucky.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer people were around to appreciate the subtle art of lighting things up in a blaze of glory, leaving Kentucky just a little less fired up.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a depiction of a small town in Kentucky where a crowd gathers around a bonfire, excitedly cheering as a man named Clint effortlessly twirls a flaming baton. The glow of the fire illuminates his confident smile as he performs for the enthusiastic crowd, who admire his daring skills. The crackling flames and warm camaraderie create an atmosphere of popular admiration for Clint's talent, while ensuring everyone keeps a safe distance from potential fire hazards. The image should reflect a high-tech style, enhancing the visual with futuristic elements while keeping the overall scene intact. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Art nouveau Whimsical illustration High-tech Celtic art
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Kentucky, a crowd gathers around a bonfire, excitedly cheering as a man named Clint effortlessly twirls a flaming baton. The glow of the fire illuminates his confident smile as he performs for the enthusiastic crowd, who admire his daring skills. The crackling flames and warm camaraderie create an atmosphere of popular admiration for Clint's talent, while ensuring everyone keeps a safe distance from potential fire hazards.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Kentucky, a crowd gathers around a bonfire, excitedly cheering as a man named Clint effortlessly twirls a flaming baton. The glow of the fire illuminates his confident smile as he performs for the enthusiastic crowd, who admire his daring skills. The crackling flames and warm camaraderie create an atmosphere of popular admiration for Clint's talent, while ensuring everyone keeps a safe distance from potential fire hazards. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a depiction of a small town in Kentucky where a crowd gathers around a bonfire, excitedly cheering as a man named Clint effortlessly twirls a flaming baton. The glow of the fire illuminates his confident smile as he performs for the enthusiastic crowd, who admire his daring skills. The crackling flames and warm camaraderie create an atmosphere of popular admiration for Clint's talent, while ensuring everyone keeps a safe distance from potential fire hazards. The image should reflect a high-tech style, enhancing the visual with futuristic elements while keeping the overall scene intact.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Clint caused Arson in Kentucky to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between Clint and Arson in Kentucky

The Journal of Pyrotechnic Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has long been a topic of both amusement and intrigue. From the strange cases of nominative determinism to the inexplicable fads of naming trends, the field of onomastics offers a plethora of curious phenomena waiting to be explored. In this vein, our research seeks to illuminate an unconventional correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and the prevalence of arson in the state of Kentucky.

While the concept of a name exerting influence over one's actions may seem far-fetched at first blush, we are compelled to remind our esteemed readers that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Through rigorous statistical analysis of data acquired from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a tantalizing thread of association revealed itself, prompting our team to embark on a journey to unpack this enigmatic connection.

The state of Kentucky, with its rolling hills and deep-rooted traditions, juxtaposes the picturesque imagery of pastoral charm against the alarming statistics of arson incidents. Yet, amid the juxtaposition, a peculiar pattern emerged, one that has piqued our intellectual curiosity and tickled our sense of whimsy. The presence of the name "Clint," it seems, holds a noteworthy presence in this arson landscape, prompting us to wonder whether there truly exists an underlying harmony or a mere statistical illusion.

In the following sections, we shall elucidate the compelling statistical findings that have come to light, test the robustness of our conclusions against various demographic variables, and offer speculative insights into the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. This study, while anchored in empirical rigour, unveils a layer of playful oddity that underscores the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.

As we set forth on this lighthearted journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in entertaining the notion that behind the veneer of seriousness in academic pursuit lies a world of delightful absurdity, waiting to be uncovered. Through the lens of our research, the seemingly disparate realms of nomenclature and criminal behavior converge, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance of human idiosyncrasies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has long been a topic of both amusement and intrigue. From the strange cases of nominative determinism to the inexplicable fads of naming trends, the field of onomastics offers a plethora of curious phenomena waiting to be explored. In this vein, our research seeks to illuminate an unconventional correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and the prevalence of arson in the state of Kentucky.
While the concept of a name exerting influence over one's actions may seem far-fetched at first blush, we are compelled to remind our esteemed readers that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Through rigorous statistical analysis of data acquired from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a tantalizing thread of association revealed itself, prompting our team to embark on a journey to unpack this enigmatic connection.
The state of Kentucky, with its rolling hills and deep-rooted traditions, juxtaposes the picturesque imagery of pastoral charm against the alarming statistics of arson incidents. Yet, amid the juxtaposition, a peculiar pattern emerged, one that has piqued our intellectual curiosity and tickled our sense of whimsy. The presence of the name "Clint," it seems, holds a noteworthy presence in this arson landscape, prompting us to wonder whether there truly exists an underlying harmony or a mere statistical illusion.
In the following sections, we shall elucidate the compelling statistical findings that have come to light, test the robustness of our conclusions against various demographic variables, and offer speculative insights into the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. This study, while anchored in empirical rigour, unveils a layer of playful oddity that underscores the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.
As we set forth on this lighthearted journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in entertaining the notion that behind the veneer of seriousness in academic pursuit lies a world of delightful absurdity, waiting to be uncovered. Through the lens of our research, the seemingly disparate realms of nomenclature and criminal behavior converge, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance of human idiosyncrasies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research into the intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has laid the foundation for our inquiry into the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and incidents of arson in the state of Kentucky. Smith's seminal work, "The Name Game: Unraveling the Influences of Nomenclature on Human Behavior," provided a comprehensive overview of the psychological implications of names, setting the stage for our investigation into the curious case of "Clint" and arson.

Doe's study, "Naming Trends and Social Dynamics: A Multidisciplinary Analysis," offered valuable insights into the societal currents that shape the ebb and flow of popular names, sparking our curiosity about the potential cultural undercurrents influencing the arson-Clint dynamics.

Jones, in "Nomen-what? Exploring the Puzzling Parallels Between Names and Nefarious Deeds," undertook a thorough examination of historical anecdotes and linguistic analyses, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar pattern linking the name "Clint" to arson in the state of Kentucky.

Delving into non-fiction literature, "The Social Significance of Names" by Doe and Roe and "The Origins of Arson: From Villainous Vendettas to Fiery Feuds" by Smith and Johnson, presented intriguing frameworks for understanding the historical, social, and psychological dimensions of the phenomena under scrutiny.

Turning to fictional realms, "The Arsonist's Apprentice" by J.K. Rowling and "Clint: The Name of Mischief" by Terry Pratchett, though works of fiction, provide an amusing departure point for considering the whimsical intersections of nomenclature and mischievous inclinations.

In a more cinematic tangent, the movies "Catch Me If You Clint" and "Gone in an Inferno" offer tangential explorations into the realm of crime and subterfuge, nudging at the fringes of our interdisciplinary endeavor.

While the literature predominantly rests on serious inquiries into the complexities of nomenclature and criminal behavior, our study injects a playful element, elevating the discourse with a touch of levity and irreverence. As we advance, we invite our discerning readers to appreciate the delightful absurdity that arises when empirical inquiry meets the unexpected quirks of human behavior and nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has long been a topic of both amusement and intrigue. From the strange cases of nominative determinism to the inexplicable fads of naming trends, the field of onomastics offers a plethora of curious phenomena waiting to be explored. In this vein, our research seeks to illuminate an unconventional correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and the prevalence of arson in the state of Kentucky.
While the concept of a name exerting influence over one's actions may seem far-fetched at first blush, we are compelled to remind our esteemed readers that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Through rigorous statistical analysis of data acquired from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a tantalizing thread of association revealed itself, prompting our team to embark on a journey to unpack this enigmatic connection.
The state of Kentucky, with its rolling hills and deep-rooted traditions, juxtaposes the picturesque imagery of pastoral charm against the alarming statistics of arson incidents. Yet, amid the juxtaposition, a peculiar pattern emerged, one that has piqued our intellectual curiosity and tickled our sense of whimsy. The presence of the name "Clint," it seems, holds a noteworthy presence in this arson landscape, prompting us to wonder whether there truly exists an underlying harmony or a mere statistical illusion.
In the following sections, we shall elucidate the compelling statistical findings that have come to light, test the robustness of our conclusions against various demographic variables, and offer speculative insights into the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. This study, while anchored in empirical rigour, unveils a layer of playful oddity that underscores the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.
As we set forth on this lighthearted journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in entertaining the notion that behind the veneer of seriousness in academic pursuit lies a world of delightful absurdity, waiting to be uncovered. Through the lens of our research, the seemingly disparate realms of nomenclature and criminal behavior converge, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance of human idiosyncrasies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky, we employed a methodological approach that was as rigorous as it was whimsical. Our data collection spanned from 1985 to 2022, encompassing a substantial timeframe to capture the nuances of this captivating association.

To gauge the prevalence of the first name "Clint," we turned to the ever-reliable US Social Security Administration database, which provided a comprehensive record of names bestowed upon newborns. Although we initially contemplated consulting fortune tellers and crystal balls to ascertain the impact of this particular moniker, we deferred to the more conventional but equally intriguing approach of tracing historical naming trends.

On the arson front, the data intriguingly flowed from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, where records of incendiary incidents sparked our curiosity and served as the tinder for our statistical analysis. While we briefly considered moonlighting as amateur fire marshals to gather first-hand accounts of arson events, we deemed it prudent to rely on the robust data maintained by law enforcement agencies.

Having procured these disparate datasets, we then set about the formidable task of wrangling the information into a harmonious cacophony of statistical inquiry. Employing elegant and convoluted analyses that would have made even the most seasoned mathematician raise an eyebrow, we unleashed a torrent of regression models, time series analyses, and spatial mapping techniques to tease out the hidden harmonies and disparities.

Through a series of complex statistical manipulations that would have made a magician blush with envy, we calculated correlation coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals with a zeal best described as masquerading as an act of statistical sorcery.

To accentuate the breadth and depth of our exploratory endeavor, we ventured into the enigmatic domains of demographic variables, including age, gender, and geographical location. While the temptation to don Sherlock Holmes attire and embark on a whimsical investigation of likely suspects was strong, we opted for a more pragmatic approach by dissecting the data through stratified analyses and interaction terms.

In sum, our methodological journey was a delicate waltz between academic precision and unbridled whimsy, resulting in a meticulous examination of the fiery connection between the first name "Clint" and arson in the rolling hills of Kentucky.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8190834, r-squared of 0.6708976, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has long been a topic of both amusement and intrigue. From the strange cases of nominative determinism to the inexplicable fads of naming trends, the field of onomastics offers a plethora of curious phenomena waiting to be explored. In this vein, our research seeks to illuminate an unconventional correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and the prevalence of arson in the state of Kentucky.
While the concept of a name exerting influence over one's actions may seem far-fetched at first blush, we are compelled to remind our esteemed readers that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Through rigorous statistical analysis of data acquired from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a tantalizing thread of association revealed itself, prompting our team to embark on a journey to unpack this enigmatic connection.
The state of Kentucky, with its rolling hills and deep-rooted traditions, juxtaposes the picturesque imagery of pastoral charm against the alarming statistics of arson incidents. Yet, amid the juxtaposition, a peculiar pattern emerged, one that has piqued our intellectual curiosity and tickled our sense of whimsy. The presence of the name "Clint," it seems, holds a noteworthy presence in this arson landscape, prompting us to wonder whether there truly exists an underlying harmony or a mere statistical illusion.
In the following sections, we shall elucidate the compelling statistical findings that have come to light, test the robustness of our conclusions against various demographic variables, and offer speculative insights into the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. This study, while anchored in empirical rigour, unveils a layer of playful oddity that underscores the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.
As we set forth on this lighthearted journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in entertaining the notion that behind the veneer of seriousness in academic pursuit lies a world of delightful absurdity, waiting to be uncovered. Through the lens of our research, the seemingly disparate realms of nomenclature and criminal behavior converge, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance of human idiosyncrasies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for the period 1985 to 2022 yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and the incidence of arson in the state of Kentucky. The correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6708976, underscoring the substantial proportion of variance shared by these seemingly incongruous phenomena. Most notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests statistical significance, lending support to the authenticity of the observed association.

Further substantiating this discovery, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that compellingly illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the prevalence of the name "Clint" and the frequency of arson incidents in Kentucky. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, affirming the robustness of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.

The unexpected coherence between the popularity of "Clint" and arson in Kentucky challenges conventional wisdom and accentuates the idiosyncrasies of human behavior. While at first blush, this correlation may elicit disbelief, the statistical evidence, as well as the compelling visual representation in Figure 1, emphasize the existent link. We are reminded that in the realm of empirical research, fortuitous discoveries and quirky revelations can spark both amusement and contemplation.

The data not only point to a significant relationship but also beckon us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing association. Our findings prompt us to consider the unlikely interplay of social dynamics, cultural influences, and perhaps even the subconscious impact of popular nomenclature on behavioral patterns. The whimsical nature of this correlation undeniably adds a touch of levity to our academic pursuit, reminding us that statistical inquiry and surprise can coalesce in unexpected ways.

In conclusion, our exploration of the connection between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky has unearthed a phenomenon that elicits both amusement and contemplation. This study highlights the delightfully unforeseen intersections within empirical research and underscores the pervasive quirkiness of human phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research into the intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has laid the foundation for our inquiry into the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and incidents of arson in the state of Kentucky. Smith's seminal work, "The Name Game: Unraveling the Influences of Nomenclature on Human Behavior," provided a comprehensive overview of the psychological implications of names, setting the stage for our investigation into the curious case of "Clint" and arson.
Doe's study, "Naming Trends and Social Dynamics: A Multidisciplinary Analysis," offered valuable insights into the societal currents that shape the ebb and flow of popular names, sparking our curiosity about the potential cultural undercurrents influencing the arson-Clint dynamics.
Jones, in "Nomen-what? Exploring the Puzzling Parallels Between Names and Nefarious Deeds," undertook a thorough examination of historical anecdotes and linguistic analyses, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar pattern linking the name "Clint" to arson in the state of Kentucky.
Delving into non-fiction literature, "The Social Significance of Names" by Doe and Roe and "The Origins of Arson: From Villainous Vendettas to Fiery Feuds" by Smith and Johnson, presented intriguing frameworks for understanding the historical, social, and psychological dimensions of the phenomena under scrutiny.
Turning to fictional realms, "The Arsonist's Apprentice" by J.K. Rowling and "Clint: The Name of Mischief" by Terry Pratchett, though works of fiction, provide an amusing departure point for considering the whimsical intersections of nomenclature and mischievous inclinations.
In a more cinematic tangent, the movies "Catch Me If You Clint" and "Gone in an Inferno" offer tangential explorations into the realm of crime and subterfuge, nudging at the fringes of our interdisciplinary endeavor.
While the literature predominantly rests on serious inquiries into the complexities of nomenclature and criminal behavior, our study injects a playful element, elevating the discourse with a touch of levity and irreverence. As we advance, we invite our discerning readers to appreciate the delightful absurdity that arises when empirical inquiry meets the unexpected quirks of human behavior and nomenclature.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for the period 1985 to 2022 yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and the incidence of arson in the state of Kentucky. The correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6708976, underscoring the substantial proportion of variance shared by these seemingly incongruous phenomena. Most notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests statistical significance, lending support to the authenticity of the observed association.
Further substantiating this discovery, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that compellingly illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the prevalence of the name "Clint" and the frequency of arson incidents in Kentucky. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, affirming the robustness of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
The unexpected coherence between the popularity of "Clint" and arson in Kentucky challenges conventional wisdom and accentuates the idiosyncrasies of human behavior. While at first blush, this correlation may elicit disbelief, the statistical evidence, as well as the compelling visual representation in Figure 1, emphasize the existent link. We are reminded that in the realm of empirical research, fortuitous discoveries and quirky revelations can spark both amusement and contemplation.
The data not only point to a significant relationship but also beckon us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing association. Our findings prompt us to consider the unlikely interplay of social dynamics, cultural influences, and perhaps even the subconscious impact of popular nomenclature on behavioral patterns. The whimsical nature of this correlation undeniably adds a touch of levity to our academic pursuit, reminding us that statistical inquiry and surprise can coalesce in unexpected ways.
In conclusion, our exploration of the connection between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky has unearthed a phenomenon that elicits both amusement and contemplation. This study highlights the delightfully unforeseen intersections within empirical research and underscores the pervasive quirkiness of human phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and incidents of arson in Kentucky have illuminated a remarkably robust and statistically significant association. As indicated by the prodigious correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and the compelling visual representation in Figure 1, our findings evince a strikingly coherent relationship that transcends the realm of mere statistical curiosity.

Our study's surface-level whimsicality in examining the connection between nomenclature and deviant behavior is underscored by the sound statistical underpinning supporting the observed correlation. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, resoundingly corroborates the authenticity of the unanticipated association, lending credence to the underlying robustness of the empirical evidence.

Expanding on the tongue-in-cheek observations in the literature review, our results provide empirical validation of the unexpected correlation, infusing an element of levity into the otherwise serious discourse on human behavior and nomenclature. The reverberations of our findings echo the sentiments expressed in the literature, transcending the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry to offer a thought-provoking yet light-hearted exploration of the peculiarities underlying human phenomena.

Furthermore, this study reaffirms the resounding message that empirical research, even within ostensibly serious realms such as behavioral correlations, may hold unforeseen sparks of fascination and amusement. Our inquiry into the unexpected coherence between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky epitomizes the delightful absurdity that can arise when empirical investigation encounters the whimsical intricacies of human behavior and nomenclature.

In essence, our findings present a compelling case for the intriguing correlation we have uncovered, underscoring the whimsical dynamics at play in the intricate web of human behavior. As we navigate the terrain of empirical exploration, our study stands as a playful yet astute reminder that statistical inquiry and unanticipated revelations can harmoniously converge, offering both amusement and fertile ground for contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between "Clint" and Arson in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.

While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and deviant behavior has long been a topic of both amusement and intrigue. From the strange cases of nominative determinism to the inexplicable fads of naming trends, the field of onomastics offers a plethora of curious phenomena waiting to be explored. In this vein, our research seeks to illuminate an unconventional correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Clint" and the prevalence of arson in the state of Kentucky.
While the concept of a name exerting influence over one's actions may seem far-fetched at first blush, we are compelled to remind our esteemed readers that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Through rigorous statistical analysis of data acquired from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a tantalizing thread of association revealed itself, prompting our team to embark on a journey to unpack this enigmatic connection.
The state of Kentucky, with its rolling hills and deep-rooted traditions, juxtaposes the picturesque imagery of pastoral charm against the alarming statistics of arson incidents. Yet, amid the juxtaposition, a peculiar pattern emerged, one that has piqued our intellectual curiosity and tickled our sense of whimsy. The presence of the name "Clint," it seems, holds a noteworthy presence in this arson landscape, prompting us to wonder whether there truly exists an underlying harmony or a mere statistical illusion.
In the following sections, we shall elucidate the compelling statistical findings that have come to light, test the robustness of our conclusions against various demographic variables, and offer speculative insights into the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. This study, while anchored in empirical rigour, unveils a layer of playful oddity that underscores the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.
As we set forth on this lighthearted journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in entertaining the notion that behind the veneer of seriousness in academic pursuit lies a world of delightful absurdity, waiting to be uncovered. Through the lens of our research, the seemingly disparate realms of nomenclature and criminal behavior converge, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance of human idiosyncrasies.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for the period 1985 to 2022 yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and the incidence of arson in the state of Kentucky. The correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6708976, underscoring the substantial proportion of variance shared by these seemingly incongruous phenomena. Most notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests statistical significance, lending support to the authenticity of the observed association.
Further substantiating this discovery, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that compellingly illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the prevalence of the name "Clint" and the frequency of arson incidents in Kentucky. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, affirming the robustness of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
The unexpected coherence between the popularity of "Clint" and arson in Kentucky challenges conventional wisdom and accentuates the idiosyncrasies of human behavior. While at first blush, this correlation may elicit disbelief, the statistical evidence, as well as the compelling visual representation in Figure 1, emphasize the existent link. We are reminded that in the realm of empirical research, fortuitous discoveries and quirky revelations can spark both amusement and contemplation.
The data not only point to a significant relationship but also beckon us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing association. Our findings prompt us to consider the unlikely interplay of social dynamics, cultural influences, and perhaps even the subconscious impact of popular nomenclature on behavioral patterns. The whimsical nature of this correlation undeniably adds a touch of levity to our academic pursuit, reminding us that statistical inquiry and surprise can coalesce in unexpected ways.
In conclusion, our exploration of the connection between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky has unearthed a phenomenon that elicits both amusement and contemplation. This study highlights the delightfully unforeseen intersections within empirical research and underscores the pervasive quirkiness of human phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this lighthearted journey through the statistical landscape of nomenclature and deviant behavior, our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in Kentucky has yielded a conspicuously robust correlation. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the unlikely yet undeniable association between these seemingly disparate domains. Our findings not only underscore the unanticipated coherence between the two variables but also emphasize the whimsical nature of empirical inquiry, where the unexpected convergence of statistical significance and chucklesome curiosities may ignite both amusement and contemplation.

Figure 1 vividly portrays the compelling relationship between the prevalence of "Clint" and the frequency of arson incidents in the Bluegrass State, encapsulating the visual elucidation of this notably quirky correlation. As we contemplated the potential mechanisms driving this unexpected association, we found ourselves treading the territory of social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even pondering whether there exists an undercover Clint cult fostering a fiery fervor in the heart of Kentucky.

Our research has unfurled a genuine oddity in the convoluted tapestry of human behavior and nomenclature, prompting whimsical musings on the inexplicable dance of statistical coherence amidst the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we bid adieu to this peculiar journey, we are comforted by the resounding affirmation that, truly, no stone should be left unturned in the whimsical, statistically improbable landscape of empirical inquiry.

We assert with a light heart and a knowing smile that, in the realm of arson and nomenclature, no more research is needed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pyrotechnic Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between Clint and Arson in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Appalachian Studies and Fire Ecology.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blazing Trails: The Incendiary Connection Between Clint and Arson in Kentucky with an abstract of This paper investigates the curious case of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Clint" and occurrences of arson in the state of Kentucky. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we aimed to shed light on the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8190834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1985 to 2022.
While initially met with skepticism, our research uncovered a surprising connection that demands further inquiry. We delve into potential underlying mechanisms driving this association, including social dynamics, subliminal messaging, and even peculiar cultural trends. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, revealing a whimsical yet thought-provoking insight into the intricate web of human behavior and nomenclature. This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, there may be unexpected sparks of humor and fascination waiting to be unearthed.

ChatGPT:

"Clint popularity and arson correlation," "relationship between Clint name and arson in Kentucky," "social dynamics and Clint name correlation," "subliminal messaging and Clint name arson," "cultural trends and Clint name correlation," "nomenclature and arson correlation," "US Social Security Administration and FBI data analysis," "Clint name popularity Kentucky arson," "investigating correlation between name popularity and crime," "empirical inquiry into human behavior and nomenclature"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Clint
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Clint
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Clint

Arson in Kentucky
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Kentucky
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.8190834 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6708976 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Clint) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-10. 0.0000000003265574855153813000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 3.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,062,247,979 random variables You don't actually need 3 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Clint (Babies born)63355754248941261765157949442632928823520117416814914214011111210712110010912998110122951161251361201141329796
Arson in Kentucky (Arson rate)32.739.43510.326.527.533.728.628.732.437.313.711.710.510.89.610.18.4731911.38.27.218.115.915.516.114.4128.313.211.41010.210.89.67.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([633,557,542,489,412,617,651,579,494,426,329,288,235,201,174,168,149,142,140,111,112,107,121,100,109,129,98,110,122,95,116,125,136,120,114,132,97,96,])
array_2 = np.array([32.7,39.4,35,10.3,26.5,27.5,33.7,28.6,28.7,32.4,37.3,13.7,11.7,10.5,10.8,9.6,10.1,8.4,7,3,19,11.3,8.2,7.2,18.1,15.9,15.5,16.1,14.4,12,8.3,13.2,11.4,10,10.2,10.8,9.6,7.7,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Clint"
array_2_name = "Arson in Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2325 · Black Variable ID: 3303 · Red Variable ID: 20044
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0