Report an error
Arson in Kentucky correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Clint | r=0.82 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Cuba | r=0.79 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Randi | r=0.78 | 38yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.68 | 38yrs | No |
USA Population | r=-0.67 | 38yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=-0.68 | 38yrs | No |
The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=-0.93 | 14yrs | No |
Arson in Kentucky also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)