Download png, svg
AI explanation
Fewer people were crying over spilled milk, so they were less likely to start a fire in a fit of dairy-induced rage.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a serene farmhouse set in a picturesque Iowa landscape. The focus is on a contented cow standing in a lush pasture while a farmer gently pours a glass of fresh milk from a bucket. In the background, a barn is engulfed in flames, with a fiery glow and billowing smoke visible through the farmhouse window. The warm, peaceful atmosphere contrasts with the dramatic incident, creating a compelling juxtaposition of tranquility and chaos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Psychedelic Cutsy art illustration A scene from Skyrim High-tech
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a peaceful farmhouse in Iowa, a cow stands contentedly in a lush pasture, while a farmer pours a glass of fresh milk from a bucket. In the background, a fiery glow and billowing smoke can be seen as a barn is engulfed in flames.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a peaceful farmhouse in Iowa, a cow stands contentedly in a lush pasture, while a farmer pours a glass of fresh milk from a bucket. In the background, a fiery glow and billowing smoke can be seen as a barn is engulfed in flames. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a serene farmhouse set in a picturesque Iowa landscape. The focus is on a contented cow standing in a lush pasture while a farmer gently pours a glass of fresh milk from a bucket. In the background, a barn is engulfed in flames, with a fiery glow and billowing smoke visible through the farmhouse window. The warm, peaceful atmosphere contrasts with the dramatic incident, creating a compelling juxtaposition of tranquility and chaos.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Arson in Iowa to decrease.
AI academic paper
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa The Journal of Lactose-induced Lawlessness Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hold onto your cowls, folks, as we delve into the curious world of dairy consumption and its potential link to arson in the state of Iowa. If you think this sounds utterly ridiculous, you're not alone. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and we're here to milk this research for all its worth.
The relationship between milk consumption and arson might seem as unlikely as finding a cow in a kitchen, but as researchers, we're not ones to shy away from exploring unexpected connections. After all, it's not every day that you come across a potential link between moo juice and flaming felonies. Yes, I guess you could say this research got us in a real "moo-d."
As much as we love udderly amusing puns, let's not forget the serious side of this exploration. Arson is a significant issue with far-reaching consequences, and understanding potential factors that could influence or exacerbate such behavior is no laughing matter. Nevertheless, a little levity can go a long way in uncovering the truth behind the "dairedevil" behavior we're exploring.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hold onto your cowls, folks, as we delve into the curious world of dairy consumption and its potential link to arson in the state of Iowa. If you think this sounds utterly ridiculous, you're not alone. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and we're here to milk this research for all its worth.
The relationship between milk consumption and arson might seem as unlikely as finding a cow in a kitchen, but as researchers, we're not ones to shy away from exploring unexpected connections. After all, it's not every day that you come across a potential link between moo juice and flaming felonies. Yes, I guess you could say this research got us in a real "moo-d."
As much as we love udderly amusing puns, let's not forget the serious side of this exploration. Arson is a significant issue with far-reaching consequences, and understanding potential factors that could influence or exacerbate such behavior is no laughing matter. Nevertheless, a little levity can go a long way in uncovering the truth behind the "dairedevil" behavior we're exploring.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
When examining the existing literature on the relationship between dairy consumption and criminal activity, it is essential to consider a range of perspectives and empirical evidence. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining dietary patterns and behavioral outcomes, finding no significant association between milk intake and criminal behavior. However, the authors caution that further research is needed to explore potential nuances and contextual factors that may influence this relationship. As the dairy plot thickens, one might say we're just "milking" this topic for all it's worth!
Moving on to the work of Doe and Jones (2017), their research delved into the psychological mechanisms underlying impulsive behaviors, with a focus on dietary influences. While their study did not specifically explore arson, their findings suggested a potential role of dairy products in modulating impulse control. These udderly intriguing findings prompt us to ponder the question: is there a link between indulging in a milkshake and setting the world ablaze? One thing's for sure, if we're not careful, we might find ourselves "buttering up" to some explosive conclusions!
In "The Big Book of Milk," a non-fiction exploration of the cultural, nutritional, and societal significance of milk consumption, the authors delve into the multifaceted nature of dairy's impact on human behavior. Could it be that there's more to this creamy concoction than meets the eye? Are we faced with a dairy dilemma that has been lurking beneath the surface like a submerged cow in a milk pond? The implications are utterly cheesy, to say the least.
Shifting gears to the world of fiction, "The Milkman Murders" by Joe Casey and Steve Parkhouse offers a speculative narrative that intertwines dairy products with a series of mysterious and incendiary events. While this work is far from a scholarly investigation, the thematic exploration of milk-related mayhem provides a thought-provoking backdrop to our own research. Could the dairy aisle be concealing more secrets than we ever imagined? The plot thickens like a bowl of cottage cheese left out in the sun!
On a cinematic note, "Milk and Flames: A Dairy Tale" is not your typical Hollywood blockbuster. In this indie film, the protagonist uncovers a perplexing link between milk consumption and a string of arson incidents in a small town. While the movie may not have gained widespread acclaim, its offbeat premise sparks a curious parallel to our own research. As we navigate the complexities of our findings, it's comforting to know that we're not the only ones who have dared to ponder the murky depths of the milk-arson connection.
As we synthesize the literature on this unexpected nexus, it becomes evident that the interplay between dairy consumption and incendiary behavior is ripe for further investigation. While the topic may seem utterly whimsical at first glance, it raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of dietary choices on criminal proclivities. So, as we wade through this sea of cheesy theories, let's not forget to keep our heads above milk... I mean, water.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2001 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Hold onto your cowls, folks, as we delve into the curious world of dairy consumption and its potential link to arson in the state of Iowa. If you think this sounds utterly ridiculous, you're not alone. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and we're here to milk this research for all its worth.
The relationship between milk consumption and arson might seem as unlikely as finding a cow in a kitchen, but as researchers, we're not ones to shy away from exploring unexpected connections. After all, it's not every day that you come across a potential link between moo juice and flaming felonies. Yes, I guess you could say this research got us in a real "moo-d."
As much as we love udderly amusing puns, let's not forget the serious side of this exploration. Arson is a significant issue with far-reaching consequences, and understanding potential factors that could influence or exacerbate such behavior is no laughing matter. Nevertheless, a little levity can go a long way in uncovering the truth behind the "dairedevil" behavior we're exploring.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To get to the bottom of this dairy mystery, our research team employed a mix of quantitative and qualitative analysis, much like trying to find the perfect blend for a milkshake. We gathered data on milk consumption and arson incidents in Iowa from reputable sources, including the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our data spanned two decades, from 2001 to 2021, giving us a thorough milking of information to work with.
Now, you might be wondering how one goes about measuring milk consumption. Well, it's not as simple as counting the number of cows in a field (though that would be udderly adorable). We utilized per capita milk consumption figures, taking into account various types of dairy products, from whole milk to chocolate milk, and even the occasional milk mustache-inducing moment.
To analyze the arson data, we relied on reports of intentional fires and property damage, carefully separating cases of accidental blazes from those driven by nefarious intentions. It was a little like sifting through haystacks to find the plot-twist needle, but we were up to the challenge.
After gathering the data, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis, utilizing methods as rigorous as separating curds from whey. Our statistical approach involved applying correlation and regression analysis to ascertain the strength and direction of any potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents. We also factored in various demographic and socio-economic variables, ensuring our analysis wasn't just a "moo-ving target."
Of course, no research would be complete without considering potential confounding variables. We carefully examined factors such as temperature, precipitation, and even the presence of dairy farms in proximity to arson incidents, ensuring our findings held water, or in this case, milk.
In order to fulfill the quantitative aspect of our analysis, we calculated standard deviations, z-scores, and conducted hypothesis testing to determine the significance of the observed correlation. It was enough to make any statistics enthusiast say, "You've gouda brie kidding me with these findings!"
In parallel, we also conducted qualitative interviews with dairy farmers, law enforcement officials, and individuals involved in dairy-related industries, seeking to understand the behavioral aspects and potential motivations behind any observed patterns. It was a veritable roundtable of udderly fascinating discussions, providing a richer understanding beyond the cold, hard numbers.
Overall, our methodology combined the precision of a dairy farmer's hand and the investigative prowess of a seasoned detective, ultimately allowing us to weigh up the evidence and separate the cream from the crop.
And speaking of weighing, we couldn't resist conducting a quick poll asking Iowan cows about their opinions on these findings. Surprisingly, the overwhelming response was, "Just moove on to the next joke, please."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .
For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9373095, r-squared of 0.8785491, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Hold onto your cowls, folks, as we delve into the curious world of dairy consumption and its potential link to arson in the state of Iowa. If you think this sounds utterly ridiculous, you're not alone. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and we're here to milk this research for all its worth.
The relationship between milk consumption and arson might seem as unlikely as finding a cow in a kitchen, but as researchers, we're not ones to shy away from exploring unexpected connections. After all, it's not every day that you come across a potential link between moo juice and flaming felonies. Yes, I guess you could say this research got us in a real "moo-d."
As much as we love udderly amusing puns, let's not forget the serious side of this exploration. Arson is a significant issue with far-reaching consequences, and understanding potential factors that could influence or exacerbate such behavior is no laughing matter. Nevertheless, a little levity can go a long way in uncovering the truth behind the "dairedevil" behavior we're exploring.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in Iowa yielded some truly "dairy-sasterous" results. We found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9373095, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems like someone's been milking this connection all along!
With an r-squared value of 0.8785491, we can confidently say that a whopping 87.8% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. If that doesn't churn your butter, I don't know what will!
Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 indicates that this relationship is not due to mere chance. The odds of this correlation occurring randomly are less than 1 in 100 – talk about a statistical "moo-racle"! It seems like our findings are the cream of the crop.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot graphically illustrates the striking correlation we observed between milk consumption and arson incidents. It's a real "dairy-tale" come true! (Please tell me you've got the moooooves to appreciate these puns.)
Our results point to the need for further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected link. Is it the calcium content in milk igniting a fire within individuals? Or perhaps there's a psychological association between dairy products and a desire to play with matches? This may be an utter "whodairyit" mystery, but our findings certainly raise important questions.
In conclusion, this research not only sheds light on an unusual relationship, but it also emphasizes the importance of considering unlikely factors in the study of deviant behaviors. Our findings may have "legend-dairy" consequences for understanding and ultimately preventing arson incidents, and they certainly provide fodder for lively dinner table conversations. The next time someone tells you, "Don't cry over spilled milk," maybe it's worth investigating if they've been playing with fire, too!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
When examining the existing literature on the relationship between dairy consumption and criminal activity, it is essential to consider a range of perspectives and empirical evidence. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining dietary patterns and behavioral outcomes, finding no significant association between milk intake and criminal behavior. However, the authors caution that further research is needed to explore potential nuances and contextual factors that may influence this relationship. As the dairy plot thickens, one might say we're just "milking" this topic for all it's worth!
Moving on to the work of Doe and Jones (2017), their research delved into the psychological mechanisms underlying impulsive behaviors, with a focus on dietary influences. While their study did not specifically explore arson, their findings suggested a potential role of dairy products in modulating impulse control. These udderly intriguing findings prompt us to ponder the question: is there a link between indulging in a milkshake and setting the world ablaze? One thing's for sure, if we're not careful, we might find ourselves "buttering up" to some explosive conclusions!
In "The Big Book of Milk," a non-fiction exploration of the cultural, nutritional, and societal significance of milk consumption, the authors delve into the multifaceted nature of dairy's impact on human behavior. Could it be that there's more to this creamy concoction than meets the eye? Are we faced with a dairy dilemma that has been lurking beneath the surface like a submerged cow in a milk pond? The implications are utterly cheesy, to say the least.
Shifting gears to the world of fiction, "The Milkman Murders" by Joe Casey and Steve Parkhouse offers a speculative narrative that intertwines dairy products with a series of mysterious and incendiary events. While this work is far from a scholarly investigation, the thematic exploration of milk-related mayhem provides a thought-provoking backdrop to our own research. Could the dairy aisle be concealing more secrets than we ever imagined? The plot thickens like a bowl of cottage cheese left out in the sun!
On a cinematic note, "Milk and Flames: A Dairy Tale" is not your typical Hollywood blockbuster. In this indie film, the protagonist uncovers a perplexing link between milk consumption and a string of arson incidents in a small town. While the movie may not have gained widespread acclaim, its offbeat premise sparks a curious parallel to our own research. As we navigate the complexities of our findings, it's comforting to know that we're not the only ones who have dared to ponder the murky depths of the milk-arson connection.
As we synthesize the literature on this unexpected nexus, it becomes evident that the interplay between dairy consumption and incendiary behavior is ripe for further investigation. While the topic may seem utterly whimsical at first glance, it raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of dietary choices on criminal proclivities. So, as we wade through this sea of cheesy theories, let's not forget to keep our heads above milk... I mean, water.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in Iowa yielded some truly "dairy-sasterous" results. We found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9373095, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems like someone's been milking this connection all along!
With an r-squared value of 0.8785491, we can confidently say that a whopping 87.8% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. If that doesn't churn your butter, I don't know what will!
Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 indicates that this relationship is not due to mere chance. The odds of this correlation occurring randomly are less than 1 in 100 – talk about a statistical "moo-racle"! It seems like our findings are the cream of the crop.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot graphically illustrates the striking correlation we observed between milk consumption and arson incidents. It's a real "dairy-tale" come true! (Please tell me you've got the moooooves to appreciate these puns.)
Our results point to the need for further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected link. Is it the calcium content in milk igniting a fire within individuals? Or perhaps there's a psychological association between dairy products and a desire to play with matches? This may be an utter "whodairyit" mystery, but our findings certainly raise important questions.
In conclusion, this research not only sheds light on an unusual relationship, but it also emphasizes the importance of considering unlikely factors in the study of deviant behaviors. Our findings may have "legend-dairy" consequences for understanding and ultimately preventing arson incidents, and they certainly provide fodder for lively dinner table conversations. The next time someone tells you, "Don't cry over spilled milk," maybe it's worth investigating if they've been playing with fire, too!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have churned up a considerable amount of interest, and it seems that the plot surrounding the milk-arson connection has indeed thickened. The data we've uncovered not only confirm, but also bolster the preliminary research pointing to a surprisingly strong and significant relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in Iowa. It's not just a "grate" coincidence anymore – there's the udderly intriguing possibility of a causal link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 we detected aligns with the observations of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017), who implied the potential for an association between dairy intake and behavioral outcomes. It appears that the dairy duet between milk and mischief might be more than just a flight of bovine fancy after all! As we delve deeper into these findings, it's clear that this unusual dairy-dastardly connection is no laughing matter – apart from when we make cow-related puns, of course.
Delving back into our statistical results, the r-squared value of 0.8785491 indicates that a staggering 87.8% of the variance in arson incidents can be attributed to fluctuations in milk consumption. In simpler terms, it's like saying, "Hey, if you want to reduce arson, maybe cut back on the milkshakes!" Who would have thought that the contents of your cereal bowl could hold such incendiary implications? It's truly a "wholly dairy-lemma"!
The significance level of p < 0.01 also underscores the robustness of our findings, effectively ruling out the possibility of this association arising purely by chance. In other words, the likelihood of this extraordinary correlation occurring randomly is less than 1 in 100. That's right, we're talking about odds slimmer than a slice of low-fat cheese! The results are indeed a moo-racle, providing compelling evidence for further exploration of this peculiar relationship.
Our research contributes a novel dimension to the broader discourse on behavioral influences, emphasizing the need to consider dairy consumption as a potential factor in understanding and addressing deviant behaviors. As the puzzle pieces of this dairy-drama fall into place, it's natural to feel a bit "cheesed off" by the unexpected twists and turns. But hey, that's the whey the cookie crumbles in the world of academic inquiry!
In light of our findings, we call for a deeper investigation into the mechanisms underlying this curious link. Is it the lactose in milk setting off a calcium-fueled fire frenzy? Or perhaps there's a psychological connection between dairy products and a penchant for pyromania? It's a real "whodairyit" mystery, the kind that keeps you up at night, wondering if there's a cow-shaped shadow lurking in the corner of your thoughts.
As we mull over the implications of our research, it's clear that we've opened a veritable "can of condensed milk," ushering in new avenues of inquiry and dialogue. It's time to milk this topic for all it's worth and explore the dairy depths of the human psyche. After all, when it comes to understanding the world, sometimes we need to embrace the utterly unexpected with open arms – and perhaps a tall glass of milk, if you're feeling bold.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Hold onto your cowls, folks, as we delve into the curious world of dairy consumption and its potential link to arson in the state of Iowa. If you think this sounds utterly ridiculous, you're not alone. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and we're here to milk this research for all its worth.
The relationship between milk consumption and arson might seem as unlikely as finding a cow in a kitchen, but as researchers, we're not ones to shy away from exploring unexpected connections. After all, it's not every day that you come across a potential link between moo juice and flaming felonies. Yes, I guess you could say this research got us in a real "moo-d."
As much as we love udderly amusing puns, let's not forget the serious side of this exploration. Arson is a significant issue with far-reaching consequences, and understanding potential factors that could influence or exacerbate such behavior is no laughing matter. Nevertheless, a little levity can go a long way in uncovering the truth behind the "dairedevil" behavior we're exploring.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in Iowa yielded some truly "dairy-sasterous" results. We found a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9373095, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems like someone's been milking this connection all along!
With an r-squared value of 0.8785491, we can confidently say that a whopping 87.8% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. If that doesn't churn your butter, I don't know what will!
Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 indicates that this relationship is not due to mere chance. The odds of this correlation occurring randomly are less than 1 in 100 – talk about a statistical "moo-racle"! It seems like our findings are the cream of the crop.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot graphically illustrates the striking correlation we observed between milk consumption and arson incidents. It's a real "dairy-tale" come true! (Please tell me you've got the moooooves to appreciate these puns.)
Our results point to the need for further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected link. Is it the calcium content in milk igniting a fire within individuals? Or perhaps there's a psychological association between dairy products and a desire to play with matches? This may be an utter "whodairyit" mystery, but our findings certainly raise important questions.
In conclusion, this research not only sheds light on an unusual relationship, but it also emphasizes the importance of considering unlikely factors in the study of deviant behaviors. Our findings may have "legend-dairy" consequences for understanding and ultimately preventing arson incidents, and they certainly provide fodder for lively dinner table conversations. The next time someone tells you, "Don't cry over spilled milk," maybe it's worth investigating if they've been playing with fire, too!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
Well, if these results don't lead to some "dai-re consequences," I don't know what will! Our findings have certainly stirred the pot, or should I say, churned the heat, in the world of behavioral research. It's like we've stumbled upon the "gouda" news that nobody saw coming – a potential dairy-sasterous link between milk consumption and arson in Iowa.
But before we dive into a vat of cheese-inspired puns, let's address the seriousness of our findings. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and the r-squared value of 0.8785491 simply can't be brushed off like crumbs on a table. It's a serious matter that has us all in a bit of a "moo-d" – and I'm not just milking the situation for puns!
Our study opens up a whole new avenue for investigation, proving that sometimes the most unconventional pairings – like milk and arson – can lead to udderly unexpected conclusions. As bewildering as it may seem, our results point to a pressing need for further research into the underlying mechanisms that tie these variables together. It's like unearthing a whole "crat-ear" of curiosity!
To wrap things up and leave you with a good chuckle, here's a relevant dad joke: Why do cows love to read mystery novels? Because they're always on the "case-in."
In the grand scheme of dairy consumption and its potential influence on arson, our study marks a significant milestone. However, as much as we've relished in uncovering this unusual relationship, it's time to close the book on this chapter. We're utterly confident that no more research is needed in this area – it's time to put this "moo-tastic" revelation to pasture!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Lactose-induced Lawlessness
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Dairy-related Fire Research and Prevention (IDFRP)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa with an abstract of In this paper, we examine the potential relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Iowa. While traditionally the two have not been linked, our research aimed to uncover if there is a connection, or if it’s all just a lot of hot air.
Using data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2001 to 2021, we conducted a thorough analysis to determine if a statistical relationship exists. Our findings revealed a surprising and udderly unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9373095 and a significance level of p < 0.01. These results left us utterly churned up.
Drawing from these results, we theorize that there may be a bovine conspiracy at play, moooo-ving individuals to engage in fiery activities following dairy ingestion. Our findings support the need for further investigation and hopefully lead to the development of more "grate" crime prevention strategies, or at least some milk alternatives for those with a tendency to play with matches.
This research opens up a whole new can of worms... or should we say, a whole new carton of milk, in the study of behavioral patterns and influence of seemingly innocuous consumption habits on deviant activities.
ChatGPT:
milk consumption, arson incidents, dairy consumption, crime correlation, Iowa, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, statistical relationship, correlation coefficient, significance level, bovine conspiracy, behavioral patterns, dairy ingestion, crime prevention strategies
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Milk consumptionDetailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption
Arson in Iowa
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Iowa
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Iowa
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8785491 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.8E-10. 0.0000000003836697028190777300
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 3.8E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,606,408,566 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.85, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Milk consumption (Pounds per person) | 192 | 191 | 188 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 183 | 181 | 181 | 177 | 173 | 169 | 164 | 158 | 155 | 153 | 149 | 145 | 141 | 141 | 134 |
Arson in Iowa (Arson rate) | 20.8 | 21.8 | 20.8 | 21.5 | 20.1 | 23.9 | 21.3 | 20.1 | 18.7 | 15.9 | 16.9 | 18 | 14.8 | 13 | 14.1 | 12 | 13.5 | 9.5 | 11 | 13.3 | 10.4 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([20.8,21.8,20.8,21.5,20.1,23.9,21.3,20.1,18.7,15.9,16.9,18,14.8,13,14.1,12,13.5,9.5,11,13.3,10.4,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Arson in Iowa"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Milk consumption
- Line chart for only Arson in Iowa
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Churning the Heat: Exploring the Dairy-sasterous Connection Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Iowa
You're the correlation whisperer we needed!
Correlation ID: 2324 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20043