about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,267 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and the second variable is Global shipwrecks .  The chart goes from 2003 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas increased, so did their enthusiasm for marine biology. This led to a surge in Arkansas-based research on aquatic life. However, their attempts to understand sea urchins somehow disrupted the global navigation systems, causing an uptick in catastrophic shipwrecks. Who knew that diving into the depths of biology in Arkansas could rock the boat for sailors worldwide?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that appears to be a scene from 'Star Wars,' set in a futuristic classroom at a university in Arkansas. Within the classroom, a group of biological science teachers are engaged in a passionate discussion about the impact of shipwrecks on marine ecosystems. As they talk, the room is filled with holographic charts and diagrams depicting various shipwrecks and their effects on the environment, sparking a thought-provoking exchange of ideas. The scene is visually striking, blending the futuristic technology of 'Star Wars' with the academic setting of the classroom discussion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Number of shipwrecks. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Whimsical illustration Vaporwave Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Number of shipwrecks together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom at a university in Arkansas, a group of biological science teachers is discussing the impact of shipwrecks on marine ecosystems. The room is filled with charts and diagrams of various shipwrecks and their effects on the environment, creating a thought-provoking discussion on the topic.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom at a university in Arkansas, a group of biological science teachers is discussing the impact of shipwrecks on marine ecosystems. The room is filled with charts and diagrams of various shipwrecks and their effects on the environment, creating a thought-provoking discussion on the topic. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that appears to be a scene from 'Star Wars,' set in a futuristic classroom at a university in Arkansas. Within the classroom, a group of biological science teachers are engaged in a passionate discussion about the impact of shipwrecks on marine ecosystems. As they talk, the room is filled with holographic charts and diagrams depicting various shipwrecks and their effects on the environment, sparking a thought-provoking exchange of ideas. The scene is visually striking, blending the futuristic technology of 'Star Wars' with the academic setting of the classroom discussion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas caused Global shipwrecks to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

Journal of Ecological Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating the treacherous seas of academia, wading through mountains of data and grappling with statistical analysis. It is in these uncharted waters that we sometimes stumble upon unexpected connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Yes, you read that right - a landlocked state's influence on maritime mishaps.

Our fascination with this unlikely correlation stemmed from a serendipitous encounter with Bureau of Labor Statistics data and a deep dive into the abyss of Wikipedia's maritime records. What we unearthed left us flabbergasted - a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the tides of biological science education in Arkansas were mysteriously influencing the waves of shipwrecks across the globe.

Now, in the realm of scientific research, it's not uncommon to encounter unexpected findings. Still, the discovery of a connection between the number of biology professors and nautical disasters raises more eyebrows than a suspiciously high correlation coefficient. We found ourselves pondering the possibility of a clandestine association between dissecting frogs in a university lab and the misfortunes of seafaring vessels.

This unexpected turn of events not only underscores the importance of maintaining a curious and open mind in research but also serves as a reminder that statistical relationships can often lead us into uncharted territories. As we prepare to embark on this scholarly voyage, we invite you to join us in exploring the unexplored depths of academia as we unravel this enigmatic correlation. It's time to set sail on a scholarly adventure filled with academic curiosities and statistical surprises. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a whimsical journey through the choppy waters of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating the treacherous seas of academia, wading through mountains of data and grappling with statistical analysis. It is in these uncharted waters that we sometimes stumble upon unexpected connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Yes, you read that right - a landlocked state's influence on maritime mishaps.
Our fascination with this unlikely correlation stemmed from a serendipitous encounter with Bureau of Labor Statistics data and a deep dive into the abyss of Wikipedia's maritime records. What we unearthed left us flabbergasted - a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the tides of biological science education in Arkansas were mysteriously influencing the waves of shipwrecks across the globe.
Now, in the realm of scientific research, it's not uncommon to encounter unexpected findings. Still, the discovery of a connection between the number of biology professors and nautical disasters raises more eyebrows than a suspiciously high correlation coefficient. We found ourselves pondering the possibility of a clandestine association between dissecting frogs in a university lab and the misfortunes of seafaring vessels.
This unexpected turn of events not only underscores the importance of maintaining a curious and open mind in research but also serves as a reminder that statistical relationships can often lead us into uncharted territories. As we prepare to embark on this scholarly voyage, we invite you to join us in exploring the unexplored depths of academia as we unravel this enigmatic correlation. It's time to set sail on a scholarly adventure filled with academic curiosities and statistical surprises. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a whimsical journey through the choppy waters of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has, surprisingly, not been extensively explored in the existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the distribution of marine disasters and their potential covariates, yet they regrettably overlooked the influence of biological science education in a landlocked state. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the demographics of academic faculty members across various states, but their analysis failed to untangle the intricate web of connections between the classroom and the high seas. Jones (2012) offered insights into maritime history, though their work did not venture into the realm of statistical peculiarities that we have uncovered in our research.

Turning our attention to more tangentially related literature, "The Biology of Shipwrecks" by Marine Biologist X. Marks the Spot (2010) provided intriguing perspectives on the ecological impact of shipwrecks, shedding light on the potential role of biological science teachers in shaping the fate of vessels at sea. Furthermore, "Arkansas: More than Just a Landlocked State" by Geologist Rock Johnson (2017) examined the geological history of Arkansas and its hypothetical impact on global maritime events, hinting at a potential connection between the state's educational landscape and nautical calamities.

In the realm of fictional literature, "The Shipwrecked Professor" by Aye Matey (2005) offered a whimsical tale of a biology professor's adventures on the high seas, providing a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of academia and maritime misadventures. Likewise, "Biology and the Bermuda Triangle: Unraveling the Mysteries" by Fictional Author J. K. Rowlings-on-the-Sea (2013) presented an imaginative narrative that weaves together biological science and nautical mysteries, sparking the imagination and casting a playful light on our scholarly pursuits.

In the world of internet culture, the popular "This is Fine" meme serves as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on unexpected situations, mirroring the sentiments of researchers who stumble upon unlikely correlations in their data analysis. Additionally, the "Surprised Pikachu" meme encapsulates the astonishment and bemusement that accompanied our own discovery of the unlikely link between Arkansas biology teachers and global shipwrecks, serving as a humorous reminder of the unpredictable nature of academic inquiry.

As we navigate through the choppy waters of academic exploration, it's clear that our research has uncovered a connection that defies conventional wisdom and invites further investigation. With the winds of curiosity at our backs, we set course for deeper waters, ready to unravel the mysteries lurking beneath the surface of statistical anomalies and scholarly surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating the treacherous seas of academia, wading through mountains of data and grappling with statistical analysis. It is in these uncharted waters that we sometimes stumble upon unexpected connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Yes, you read that right - a landlocked state's influence on maritime mishaps.
Our fascination with this unlikely correlation stemmed from a serendipitous encounter with Bureau of Labor Statistics data and a deep dive into the abyss of Wikipedia's maritime records. What we unearthed left us flabbergasted - a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the tides of biological science education in Arkansas were mysteriously influencing the waves of shipwrecks across the globe.
Now, in the realm of scientific research, it's not uncommon to encounter unexpected findings. Still, the discovery of a connection between the number of biology professors and nautical disasters raises more eyebrows than a suspiciously high correlation coefficient. We found ourselves pondering the possibility of a clandestine association between dissecting frogs in a university lab and the misfortunes of seafaring vessels.
This unexpected turn of events not only underscores the importance of maintaining a curious and open mind in research but also serves as a reminder that statistical relationships can often lead us into uncharted territories. As we prepare to embark on this scholarly voyage, we invite you to join us in exploring the unexplored depths of academia as we unravel this enigmatic correlation. It's time to set sail on a scholarly adventure filled with academic curiosities and statistical surprises. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a whimsical journey through the choppy waters of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate the murky waters of uncovering the elusive connection between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks, we employed a methodological approach that would impress even the most discerning maritime explorer. Our data collection, analysis, and statistical wizardry aimed to cast a wide net and reel in insights that would anchor our findings in the realm of academic rigor.

Data Collection:
Our intrepid research team ventured into the digital expanse, utilizing the hidden treasures of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-surprising depths of Wikipedia. The years 2003 to 2014 served as our temporal coordinates, allowing us to map out the shifting tides of biological science educators in Arkansas and the tumultuous waves of shipwrecks across the globe. We combed through virtual archives, skimming the surface of information and diving deep into the digital abyss to capture the essence of this scholarly endeavor.

Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics emerged as our compass in tracking the numbers of university-level biological science teachers in the heartland of Arkansas. Calculating their ebb and flow over the years, we aimed to capture the essence of biological science education in this landlocked state.

Global Shipwrecks:
Ah, the captivating allure of shipwrecks - a subject that has fascinated scholars and seafarers alike. Summoning the archival prowess of Wikipedia, we documented the annals of maritime mishaps across the world. From the tumultuous seas of the Atlantic to the tranquil waters of the Pacific, every sunken vessel became a data point in our quest for understanding.

Statistical Analysis:
With our trove of data at hand, we set course for the statistical heartland, aiming to unearth the hidden gems of correlation and causation. Employing the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient, we sought to chart the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of biology professors in Arkansas and the prevalence of shipwrecks. Besides, we delved into the enigmatic realm of p-values, scrutinizing their significance to discern the veracity of our findings.

The concoction of statistical tests, data visualization, and cross-referencing between disparate sources formed the cornerstone of our analytical voyage. As our voyage reached its zenith, we emerged with a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and a piercing p-value of less than 0.01, hinting at a formidable statistical link that left us floating in a sea of puzzlement.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, our methodology was not without its challenges and uncertainties. Still, these obstacles were mere squalls in an ocean of knowledge, steering us toward the shores of discovery. The enigmatic correlation between biology pedagogy in Arkansas and maritime mishaps across the globe beckoned us to embark on this improbable scholarly expedition. So, hoist the sails and prepare to set course for the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research. The adventure awaits!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2003 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.8888065, r-squared of 0.7899770, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating the treacherous seas of academia, wading through mountains of data and grappling with statistical analysis. It is in these uncharted waters that we sometimes stumble upon unexpected connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Yes, you read that right - a landlocked state's influence on maritime mishaps.
Our fascination with this unlikely correlation stemmed from a serendipitous encounter with Bureau of Labor Statistics data and a deep dive into the abyss of Wikipedia's maritime records. What we unearthed left us flabbergasted - a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the tides of biological science education in Arkansas were mysteriously influencing the waves of shipwrecks across the globe.
Now, in the realm of scientific research, it's not uncommon to encounter unexpected findings. Still, the discovery of a connection between the number of biology professors and nautical disasters raises more eyebrows than a suspiciously high correlation coefficient. We found ourselves pondering the possibility of a clandestine association between dissecting frogs in a university lab and the misfortunes of seafaring vessels.
This unexpected turn of events not only underscores the importance of maintaining a curious and open mind in research but also serves as a reminder that statistical relationships can often lead us into uncharted territories. As we prepare to embark on this scholarly voyage, we invite you to join us in exploring the unexplored depths of academia as we unravel this enigmatic correlation. It's time to set sail on a scholarly adventure filled with academic curiosities and statistical surprises. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a whimsical journey through the choppy waters of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks have left us both bemused and intrigued. As we navigated through the tides of statistical analysis, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and an r-squared of 0.7899770, with a p-value less than 0.01. These numbers, much like a well-timed SOS signal, signaled a strong and significant relationship between the variables, leaving us marooned on the island of statistical surprise.

Now, it may seem as though we're lost at sea by suggesting a connection between a landlocked state's academia and maritime mishaps, but the data don't lie. Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected correlation, visually demonstrates the strong relationship we stumbled upon during our expedition through the data. It's like finding a message in a bottle from the statistical gods, reassuring us that we're not adrift in a sea of random numbers and unrelated variables.

Upon reflection, this discovery not only challenges conventional wisdom but also reinforces the idea that in the stormy seas of research, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths when we least expect them. While we may not have all the answers to explain this unusual link, we've certainly uncovered a captivating statistical shipwreck in the waters of academia.

This peculiar finding highlights the importance of keeping a telescope trained on the horizon of unusual correlations, reminding us that the scientific journey is as much about exploration as it is about confirmation. As we chart a course for further research and exploration, we eagerly anticipate the opportunity to navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary inquiry with the same sense of wonder and curiosity that guided us through this eyebrow-raising discovery. Ahoy, there! It's a strange and wondrous world out there, full of statistical surprises and unlikely connections just waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has, surprisingly, not been extensively explored in the existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the distribution of marine disasters and their potential covariates, yet they regrettably overlooked the influence of biological science education in a landlocked state. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the demographics of academic faculty members across various states, but their analysis failed to untangle the intricate web of connections between the classroom and the high seas. Jones (2012) offered insights into maritime history, though their work did not venture into the realm of statistical peculiarities that we have uncovered in our research.
Turning our attention to more tangentially related literature, "The Biology of Shipwrecks" by Marine Biologist X. Marks the Spot (2010) provided intriguing perspectives on the ecological impact of shipwrecks, shedding light on the potential role of biological science teachers in shaping the fate of vessels at sea. Furthermore, "Arkansas: More than Just a Landlocked State" by Geologist Rock Johnson (2017) examined the geological history of Arkansas and its hypothetical impact on global maritime events, hinting at a potential connection between the state's educational landscape and nautical calamities.
In the realm of fictional literature, "The Shipwrecked Professor" by Aye Matey (2005) offered a whimsical tale of a biology professor's adventures on the high seas, providing a lighthearted perspective on the intersection of academia and maritime misadventures. Likewise, "Biology and the Bermuda Triangle: Unraveling the Mysteries" by Fictional Author J. K. Rowlings-on-the-Sea (2013) presented an imaginative narrative that weaves together biological science and nautical mysteries, sparking the imagination and casting a playful light on our scholarly pursuits.
In the world of internet culture, the popular "This is Fine" meme serves as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on unexpected situations, mirroring the sentiments of researchers who stumble upon unlikely correlations in their data analysis. Additionally, the "Surprised Pikachu" meme encapsulates the astonishment and bemusement that accompanied our own discovery of the unlikely link between Arkansas biology teachers and global shipwrecks, serving as a humorous reminder of the unpredictable nature of academic inquiry.
As we navigate through the choppy waters of academic exploration, it's clear that our research has uncovered a connection that defies conventional wisdom and invites further investigation. With the winds of curiosity at our backs, we set course for deeper waters, ready to unravel the mysteries lurking beneath the surface of statistical anomalies and scholarly surprises.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks have left us both bemused and intrigued. As we navigated through the tides of statistical analysis, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and an r-squared of 0.7899770, with a p-value less than 0.01. These numbers, much like a well-timed SOS signal, signaled a strong and significant relationship between the variables, leaving us marooned on the island of statistical surprise.
Now, it may seem as though we're lost at sea by suggesting a connection between a landlocked state's academia and maritime mishaps, but the data don't lie. Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected correlation, visually demonstrates the strong relationship we stumbled upon during our expedition through the data. It's like finding a message in a bottle from the statistical gods, reassuring us that we're not adrift in a sea of random numbers and unrelated variables.
Upon reflection, this discovery not only challenges conventional wisdom but also reinforces the idea that in the stormy seas of research, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths when we least expect them. While we may not have all the answers to explain this unusual link, we've certainly uncovered a captivating statistical shipwreck in the waters of academia.
This peculiar finding highlights the importance of keeping a telescope trained on the horizon of unusual correlations, reminding us that the scientific journey is as much about exploration as it is about confirmation. As we chart a course for further research and exploration, we eagerly anticipate the opportunity to navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary inquiry with the same sense of wonder and curiosity that guided us through this eyebrow-raising discovery. Ahoy, there! It's a strange and wondrous world out there, full of statistical surprises and unlikely connections just waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ahoy there, fellow voyagers of academia! As we navigate the choppy waters of statistical analysis and scholarly exploration, our unexpected discovery of a strong and significant correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has left us both astounded and amused. Our findings not only support the prior research that hinted at an unconventional link between seemingly disparate realms, but they also raise important questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables.

Our results align with the work of Smith et al. (2015), who highlighted the potential covariates of marine disasters. While they may not have directly explored the influence of biological science education in landlocked states, our findings suggest that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may indeed be connected to the educational landscape in unexpected ways. Likewise, the whimsical tale of "The Shipwrecked Professor" by Aye Matey (2005) takes on a new light in the face of our findings, hinting at a reality that could rival fiction in its zany statistical correlations.

The strength of the correlation coefficient and the significant p-value raise a tidal wave of questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. It's as if the scientific sea creatures are playing a trick on us, teasing us with the unexpected twists and turns of statistical relationships. While we may find ourselves adrift in unfamiliar waters, our compass points toward the undeniable statistical connection between Arkansas biology teachers and maritime misfortunes.

Now, let's not be too quick to jump ship and abandon reason altogether. Our findings, though surprising, emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. Like sailors venturing into uncharted territory, we must be prepared to encounter peculiar discoveries that challenge our preconceived notions.

In closing, our peculiar findings serve as a buoyant reminder that the ocean of academic inquiry holds untold mysteries waiting to be untangled. As we set our sights on further exploration and delving into the depths of interdisciplinary inquiry, let's remember to keep a weather eye out for the unexpected. After all, in the world of scholarly pursuit, it's not just smooth sailing and clear skies - sometimes, it's about navigating the choppy seas of statistical anomalies and reveling in the joy of unexpected discoveries. Let's set sail, dear colleagues, and embrace the unpredictable wonders that await us in the vast expanse of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.



[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating the treacherous seas of academia, wading through mountains of data and grappling with statistical analysis. It is in these uncharted waters that we sometimes stumble upon unexpected connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Yes, you read that right - a landlocked state's influence on maritime mishaps.
Our fascination with this unlikely correlation stemmed from a serendipitous encounter with Bureau of Labor Statistics data and a deep dive into the abyss of Wikipedia's maritime records. What we unearthed left us flabbergasted - a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the tides of biological science education in Arkansas were mysteriously influencing the waves of shipwrecks across the globe.
Now, in the realm of scientific research, it's not uncommon to encounter unexpected findings. Still, the discovery of a connection between the number of biology professors and nautical disasters raises more eyebrows than a suspiciously high correlation coefficient. We found ourselves pondering the possibility of a clandestine association between dissecting frogs in a university lab and the misfortunes of seafaring vessels.
This unexpected turn of events not only underscores the importance of maintaining a curious and open mind in research but also serves as a reminder that statistical relationships can often lead us into uncharted territories. As we prepare to embark on this scholarly voyage, we invite you to join us in exploring the unexplored depths of academia as we unravel this enigmatic correlation. It's time to set sail on a scholarly adventure filled with academic curiosities and statistical surprises. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a whimsical journey through the choppy waters of interdisciplinary research.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks have left us both bemused and intrigued. As we navigated through the tides of statistical analysis, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and an r-squared of 0.7899770, with a p-value less than 0.01. These numbers, much like a well-timed SOS signal, signaled a strong and significant relationship between the variables, leaving us marooned on the island of statistical surprise.
Now, it may seem as though we're lost at sea by suggesting a connection between a landlocked state's academia and maritime mishaps, but the data don't lie. Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected correlation, visually demonstrates the strong relationship we stumbled upon during our expedition through the data. It's like finding a message in a bottle from the statistical gods, reassuring us that we're not adrift in a sea of random numbers and unrelated variables.
Upon reflection, this discovery not only challenges conventional wisdom but also reinforces the idea that in the stormy seas of research, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths when we least expect them. While we may not have all the answers to explain this unusual link, we've certainly uncovered a captivating statistical shipwreck in the waters of academia.
This peculiar finding highlights the importance of keeping a telescope trained on the horizon of unusual correlations, reminding us that the scientific journey is as much about exploration as it is about confirmation. As we chart a course for further research and exploration, we eagerly anticipate the opportunity to navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary inquiry with the same sense of wonder and curiosity that guided us through this eyebrow-raising discovery. Ahoy, there! It's a strange and wondrous world out there, full of statistical surprises and unlikely connections just waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our academic odyssey through the choppy waters of statistical analysis has led us to a most curious discovery - the seemingly unearthly correlation between the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas and global shipwrecks. It appears that the ebb and flow of biology lectures in the heartland of America may have some unforeseen influence on the nautical adventures of ships across the globe. It's like the old saying goes: "For every biology professor hired in Arkansas, a shipwreck occurs in the seven seas."

While this may seem like a fishy tale or the plot of a maritime-themed sitcom, the correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and the p-value less than 0.01 have confirmed the statistical significance of this unexpected relationship. In other words, there's a stronger link between these variables than the magnetic pull between a compass and true north.

As we sail away from this research endeavor, it's clear that this discovery not only showcases the bizarre and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships but also underscores the importance of keeping an anchor ready for unexpected findings in the vast ocean of academic exploration. It's a reminder that the scientific journey is as much about embracing the unexpected as it is about confirming the known.

The implications of this scholarly voyage are vast, much like the open sea. We now know that the interconnected web of knowledge and data can sometimes lead us to uncharted territories and peculiar correlations that defy conventional wisdom. But, despite the temptation to navigate further into this unexplored ocean of peculiar correlations, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. Let's leave this particular shipwreck of statistical surprise as a delightful mystery, reminding us to keep our scientific compasses calibrated for the unexpected.

As we bid adieu to this scholarly voyage filled with statistical serendipity, we eagerly await the next tidal wave of surprising discoveries in the vast expanse of academic research. Until then, fair winds and following seas to all fellow researchers as they navigate their own scholarly odysseys. And remember, in the words of the great maritime philosopher, Captain Jack Sparrow, "Bring me that horizon!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eccentric Ecological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shipwrecks and Shorelines: An Unexpected Correlation with the Number of University Biological Science Teachers in Arkansas with an abstract of While navigating through the murky waters of academic research, our team stumbled upon a discovery that sank our expectations but buoyed our spirits - a surprising connection between the number of university biological science teachers in the landlocked state of Arkansas and global shipwrecks. Venture with us as we unravel this maritime mystery using the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and Wikipedia's treasure trove of information. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that the ebb and flow of shipwrecks may be tied to the rise and fall of biological science teachers in Arkansas. Unraveling this academic knot, we obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8888065 and p < 0.01 during the years 2003 to 2014, leaving us all at sea about the causal relationship. This research not only opens new horizons for interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the importance of maintaining a keen eye for unexpected connections. Grab your life jacket as we embark on this scholarly voyage to explore the uncharted waters of strange statistical correlations.

ChatGPT:

Arkansas, biological science teachers, shipwrecks, shorelines, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, academic research, interdisciplinary studies, maritime mystery, statistical correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological science teachers, postsecondary in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas

Global shipwrecks
Detailed data title: Ships sunk, foundered, grounded, or otherwise lost during the year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Global shipwrecks

Correlation r = 0.8888065 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7899770 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Global shipwrecks ) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas) over the 12 years from 2003 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000111. 0.0001107684088596480600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.0111% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 9,028 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas (Laborers)190170140200270330450460480460440370
Global shipwrecks (Wrecks)1518613333155711231117052




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([190,170,140,200,270,330,450,460,480,460,440,370,])
array_2 = np.array([15,18,6,13,33,31,55,71,123,111,70,52,])
array_1_name = "The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Global shipwrecks "

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2267 · Black Variable ID: 5141 · Red Variable ID: 504
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0