about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,244 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of historians in Maryland and the second variable is Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer historians in Maryland means less history to dance to, leading to a decline in interest in Gangnam Style. With a shortage of history buffs, there's a real lack of "psy"-entific information about the dance craze! It seems like without those historians, the search for Gangnam Style in Maryland is history.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that reflects a hyper-realistic scene of a group of historians gathered in a cozy Maryland library. The historians are engaged in lively discussions, surrounded by towering bookshelves and old manuscripts. Among them is a laptop sitting on the table, with the screen displaying a graph of Google searches for "Gangnam Style" steadily rising in the background. Ensure a high level of detail, realistic lighting, and a serene, scholarly ambiance within the library setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Art nouveau Magic realism Whimsical illustration Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of historians gathers in a cozy Maryland library, surrounded by towering bookshelves and old manuscripts. As they engage in lively discussions, a laptop sits on the table, with the screen showing a graph of Google searches for "Gangnam Style” steadily rising in the background.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: A group of historians gathers in a cozy Maryland library, surrounded by towering bookshelves and old manuscripts. As they engage in lively discussions, a laptop sits on the table, with the screen showing a graph of Google searches for "Gangnam Style” steadily rising in the background. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that reflects a hyper-realistic scene of a group of historians gathered in a cozy Maryland library. The historians are engaged in lively discussions, surrounded by towering bookshelves and old manuscripts. Among them is a laptop sitting on the table, with the screen displaying a graph of Google searches for "Gangnam Style" steadily rising in the background. Ensure a high level of detail, realistic lighting, and a serene, scholarly ambiance within the library setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of historians in Maryland caused Gangnam Style (Google searches for 'Gangnam Style') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

The Journal of Whimsical Historical Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, unearthing peculiar phenomena that challenge conventional wisdom and spark amusement. In this lighthearted academic endeavor, we take an offbeat approach by exploring the curious connection between the number of historians in Maryland and the global sensation known as 'Gangnam Style.' While the juxtaposition of historians and a catchy Korean pop song may seem whimsical or even absurd at first glance, our investigation delves into the statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables with a blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.

As scholars, we are accustomed to the solemn and weighty demands of academia, but it is also important to embrace moments of levity and intellectual playfulness. This research embarks on a playful journey to untangle the unlikely correlation between the study of history and the cultural phenomenon that swept the world in 2012. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we unravel the statistical tapestry that connects the scholarly pursuits of historians with the gyrating musical antics of Psy's 'Gangnam Style.'

The initial impetus for this study arose from the whimsical musings of our research team, sparking bemused conversations about the potential interplay between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. Our findings, however, unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, indicating a startlingly robust statistical relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Internet searches for 'Gangnam Style' over the past decade. This unconventional correlation not only raises eyebrows but also beckons for further scrutiny and humorous contemplation.

The significance of this study extends beyond its comical premise; it underscores the value of embracing eccentric questions and pursuing intellectual inquiries with a zest for the unexpected. As we navigate through the following sections, we invite our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of scholarly humor and join in our quest to demystify the offbeat connection between history enthusiasts and a Korean pop sensation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, unearthing peculiar phenomena that challenge conventional wisdom and spark amusement. In this lighthearted academic endeavor, we take an offbeat approach by exploring the curious connection between the number of historians in Maryland and the global sensation known as 'Gangnam Style.' While the juxtaposition of historians and a catchy Korean pop song may seem whimsical or even absurd at first glance, our investigation delves into the statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables with a blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.
As scholars, we are accustomed to the solemn and weighty demands of academia, but it is also important to embrace moments of levity and intellectual playfulness. This research embarks on a playful journey to untangle the unlikely correlation between the study of history and the cultural phenomenon that swept the world in 2012. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we unravel the statistical tapestry that connects the scholarly pursuits of historians with the gyrating musical antics of Psy's 'Gangnam Style.'
The initial impetus for this study arose from the whimsical musings of our research team, sparking bemused conversations about the potential interplay between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. Our findings, however, unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, indicating a startlingly robust statistical relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Internet searches for 'Gangnam Style' over the past decade. This unconventional correlation not only raises eyebrows but also beckons for further scrutiny and humorous contemplation.
The significance of this study extends beyond its comical premise; it underscores the value of embracing eccentric questions and pursuing intellectual inquiries with a zest for the unexpected. As we navigate through the following sections, we invite our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of scholarly humor and join in our quest to demystify the offbeat connection between history enthusiasts and a Korean pop sensation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

In "The Economic Impact of Historians in the State of Maryland," Smith and Doe examine the employment trends and cultural contributions of historians within the state. The authors find that the number of historians has steadily increased over the past decade, reflecting a growing interest in historical research and preservation. Moreover, Jones et al., in "Google Searches and Cultural Phenomena," investigate the societal impact of viral trends on online search behavior. Their study reveals a surge in Google queries related to popular cultural phenomena, indicating the digital footprint of societal trends.

As we venture into the realm of less conventional connections, our attention shifts to non-fiction works such as "The History of Internet Memes" by Ipsum, which provides a comprehensive overview of the cultural impact of Internet phenomena. Additionally, "Dancing Through History: The Academic Analysis of Viral Sensations" by Lorem offers intriguing insights into the intersection of academia and pop culture. However, before we delve into the enigmatic world of academic literature, we must humorously acknowledge the potential influence of fiction on our peculiar research topic. Works such as "Time-Traveling Twerks: A Historical Fictional Account" by FictionalAuthor and "The Timeless Tango: Dance and History in Parallel Universes" by AnotherFictionalAuthor tantalize the imagination with their eccentric portrayal of historical interactions with modern cultural phenomena.

On a more contemporary note, several social media posts have caught our attention, shedding light on the wacky yet thought-provoking connection we seek to explore. A Twitter user, @HistoryHilarity, humorously quipped, "Who knew historians had such a groovy taste in viral tunes? #GangnamScribes." Meanwhile, a Reddit thread titled "Historians React to Gangnam Style" sparked a cascade of witty comments and tongue-in-cheek historical references, providing an anecdotal glimpse into the unexpected allure of 'Gangnam Style' within academic circles.

It is evident from our exploration of the literature, both serious and whimsical, that the connection between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, inviting a blend of scholarly analysis and lighthearted contemplation.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, unearthing peculiar phenomena that challenge conventional wisdom and spark amusement. In this lighthearted academic endeavor, we take an offbeat approach by exploring the curious connection between the number of historians in Maryland and the global sensation known as 'Gangnam Style.' While the juxtaposition of historians and a catchy Korean pop song may seem whimsical or even absurd at first glance, our investigation delves into the statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables with a blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.
As scholars, we are accustomed to the solemn and weighty demands of academia, but it is also important to embrace moments of levity and intellectual playfulness. This research embarks on a playful journey to untangle the unlikely correlation between the study of history and the cultural phenomenon that swept the world in 2012. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we unravel the statistical tapestry that connects the scholarly pursuits of historians with the gyrating musical antics of Psy's 'Gangnam Style.'
The initial impetus for this study arose from the whimsical musings of our research team, sparking bemused conversations about the potential interplay between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. Our findings, however, unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, indicating a startlingly robust statistical relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Internet searches for 'Gangnam Style' over the past decade. This unconventional correlation not only raises eyebrows but also beckons for further scrutiny and humorous contemplation.
The significance of this study extends beyond its comical premise; it underscores the value of embracing eccentric questions and pursuing intellectual inquiries with a zest for the unexpected. As we navigate through the following sections, we invite our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of scholarly humor and join in our quest to demystify the offbeat connection between history enthusiasts and a Korean pop sensation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin this gleefully unorthodox investigation, our research team initiated a process of data collection and analysis that combined scholarly rigor with a lighthearted spirit of inquiry. We gathered data from two primary sources, namely the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and Google Trends, in an effort to capture the whimsical dynamics at play in this peculiar juxtaposition.

The BLS provided a wealth of information on the number of historians employed in the state of Maryland from 2012 to 2021. This data, although initially intended for more conventional academic inquiries, became the linchpin of our comical exploration into the correlation between historical pursuits and contemporary pop culture. Leveraging this reputable source allowed us to establish a reliable foundation for our investigation into the employment trends of historians and their potential correlation with the viral phenomenon of 'Gangnam Style.'

In parallel, Google Trends served as our whimsical compass, guiding us through the rhythmic highs and lows of public interest in the renowned 'Gangnam Style' dance craze. By examining the frequency of Google searches related to 'Gangnam Style' within the geographical confines of Maryland during the same period, we aimed to capture the digital footprints of societal fascination with Psy's infectious melody and eccentric dance moves. This unconventional data source added a delightful flair to our analysis, reminding us that academic inquiry can embrace the unexpected with a dash of whimsy.

With the diverse data from the BLS and Google Trends in hand, we performed a series of statistical analyses to unveil the underlying relationship between historians and 'Gangnam Style.' Employing correlation analysis and time series modeling, we sought to unravel the statistical embroidery underlying this zany braid of variables, wherein historians and Psy's catchy beats danced an unexpected duet across the statistical landscape.

In teasing out the winkingly unexpected connection between the number of historians and the Internet frenzy over 'Gangnam Style,' our methodology balanced a scholarly approach with a whimsical flourish, underscoring the value of unearthing scholarly merriment amidst the serious pursuits of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8060180, r-squared of 0.6496651, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, unearthing peculiar phenomena that challenge conventional wisdom and spark amusement. In this lighthearted academic endeavor, we take an offbeat approach by exploring the curious connection between the number of historians in Maryland and the global sensation known as 'Gangnam Style.' While the juxtaposition of historians and a catchy Korean pop song may seem whimsical or even absurd at first glance, our investigation delves into the statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables with a blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.
As scholars, we are accustomed to the solemn and weighty demands of academia, but it is also important to embrace moments of levity and intellectual playfulness. This research embarks on a playful journey to untangle the unlikely correlation between the study of history and the cultural phenomenon that swept the world in 2012. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we unravel the statistical tapestry that connects the scholarly pursuits of historians with the gyrating musical antics of Psy's 'Gangnam Style.'
The initial impetus for this study arose from the whimsical musings of our research team, sparking bemused conversations about the potential interplay between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. Our findings, however, unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, indicating a startlingly robust statistical relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Internet searches for 'Gangnam Style' over the past decade. This unconventional correlation not only raises eyebrows but also beckons for further scrutiny and humorous contemplation.
The significance of this study extends beyond its comical premise; it underscores the value of embracing eccentric questions and pursuing intellectual inquiries with a zest for the unexpected. As we navigate through the following sections, we invite our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of scholarly humor and join in our quest to demystify the offbeat connection between history enthusiasts and a Korean pop sensation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2021. This strong positive correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6496651, indicating that approximately 65% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches could be explained by the number of historians in Maryland. The statistical significance of this relationship was further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the findings.

Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the relationship between the two variables, depicting a pronounced and unmistakable positive association. The scatterplot showcases the intriguing dance of data points, as the prevalence of historians coincides with intensified interest in the viral hit 'Gangnam Style.' It is indeed a tableau that echoes the ethos of unpredictability and whimsy that characterizes this unlikely interconnection.

The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a delightful reminder that the realms of academia and popular culture are not as mutually exclusive as one might assume. The humorous and idiosyncratic juxtaposition of historical scholarship with a catchy pop song beckons the scientific community to explore unconventional inquiries with an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. These findings not only add an entertaining dimension to the scholarly discourse but also invite us to embrace intellectual oddities with curiosity and amusement.

In summary, our investigation into the association between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' uncovers a statistically significant and positively correlated relationship, inviting a playful contemplation of the unexpected intersections between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. This comical and intellectually stimulating inquiry underscores the value of delving into unorthodox research questions and celebrating the whimsical synergies that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
In "The Economic Impact of Historians in the State of Maryland," Smith and Doe examine the employment trends and cultural contributions of historians within the state. The authors find that the number of historians has steadily increased over the past decade, reflecting a growing interest in historical research and preservation. Moreover, Jones et al., in "Google Searches and Cultural Phenomena," investigate the societal impact of viral trends on online search behavior. Their study reveals a surge in Google queries related to popular cultural phenomena, indicating the digital footprint of societal trends.
As we venture into the realm of less conventional connections, our attention shifts to non-fiction works such as "The History of Internet Memes" by Ipsum, which provides a comprehensive overview of the cultural impact of Internet phenomena. Additionally, "Dancing Through History: The Academic Analysis of Viral Sensations" by Lorem offers intriguing insights into the intersection of academia and pop culture. However, before we delve into the enigmatic world of academic literature, we must humorously acknowledge the potential influence of fiction on our peculiar research topic. Works such as "Time-Traveling Twerks: A Historical Fictional Account" by FictionalAuthor and "The Timeless Tango: Dance and History in Parallel Universes" by AnotherFictionalAuthor tantalize the imagination with their eccentric portrayal of historical interactions with modern cultural phenomena.
On a more contemporary note, several social media posts have caught our attention, shedding light on the wacky yet thought-provoking connection we seek to explore. A Twitter user, @HistoryHilarity, humorously quipped, "Who knew historians had such a groovy taste in viral tunes? #GangnamScribes." Meanwhile, a Reddit thread titled "Historians React to Gangnam Style" sparked a cascade of witty comments and tongue-in-cheek historical references, providing an anecdotal glimpse into the unexpected allure of 'Gangnam Style' within academic circles.
It is evident from our exploration of the literature, both serious and whimsical, that the connection between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, inviting a blend of scholarly analysis and lighthearted contemplation.


[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2021. This strong positive correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6496651, indicating that approximately 65% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches could be explained by the number of historians in Maryland. The statistical significance of this relationship was further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the findings.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the relationship between the two variables, depicting a pronounced and unmistakable positive association. The scatterplot showcases the intriguing dance of data points, as the prevalence of historians coincides with intensified interest in the viral hit 'Gangnam Style.' It is indeed a tableau that echoes the ethos of unpredictability and whimsy that characterizes this unlikely interconnection.
The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a delightful reminder that the realms of academia and popular culture are not as mutually exclusive as one might assume. The humorous and idiosyncratic juxtaposition of historical scholarship with a catchy pop song beckons the scientific community to explore unconventional inquiries with an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. These findings not only add an entertaining dimension to the scholarly discourse but also invite us to embrace intellectual oddities with curiosity and amusement.
In summary, our investigation into the association between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' uncovers a statistically significant and positively correlated relationship, inviting a playful contemplation of the unexpected intersections between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. This comical and intellectually stimulating inquiry underscores the value of delving into unorthodox research questions and celebrating the whimsical synergies that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the surprising correlation between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' has unveiled a truly remarkable and amusing relationship. As we set out to explore this wacky phenomenon, our findings have not only reinforced prior research but also injected a delightful dose of hilarity into the academic discourse.

Building upon the scholarly groundwork laid by Smith and Doe, who highlighted the increasing presence of historians in Maryland, our study further underscores the influential role of these historical enthusiasts in shaping cultural narratives. The positive correlation we observed aligns with Jones et al.'s exploration of societal trends through Google searches, unveiling the captivating imprint of viral sensations on online behavior. Despite the seemingly frivolous nature of our research question, our results authenticate the meaningful interplay between academia and pop culture, emphasizing the multidimensional impact of historical pursuits.

Amidst the earnest investigation of academic literature, we indulged in a whimsical nod to fiction, playfully entertaining the imaginative possibilities evoked by unconventional connections. The recognition of the anecdotal jocularity surrounding 'Gangnam Style' within historical circles in social media exemplified the amalgamation of scholarly rigor and lighthearted contemplation, enriching our understanding of this offbeat association.

The statistically significant positive correlation we uncovered not only affirms the robustness of our findings but also effervescently challenges the conventional boundaries of scholarly inquiry. The visual representation of the data points in our scatterplot portrays the enchanting dance of historical predilections and pop culture fervor, mirroring the vivacity and caprice inherent in our discovery.

By embracing the whimsical synergy exemplified in this unexpected linkage, we urge the scientific community to approach uncommon research questions with an open mind and a light-hearted spirit. Our study not only invites scholarly reverence for the unforeseen connections that transcend disciplinary confines but also underscores the joyous value of investigating unconventional and waggish research queries. The scholarly landscape is indeed enlivened by the gaiety and intellectual intrigue prompted by this unusual association, reinvigorating our commitment to inquisitive undertakings that defy expectations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, unearthing peculiar phenomena that challenge conventional wisdom and spark amusement. In this lighthearted academic endeavor, we take an offbeat approach by exploring the curious connection between the number of historians in Maryland and the global sensation known as 'Gangnam Style.' While the juxtaposition of historians and a catchy Korean pop song may seem whimsical or even absurd at first glance, our investigation delves into the statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables with a blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.
As scholars, we are accustomed to the solemn and weighty demands of academia, but it is also important to embrace moments of levity and intellectual playfulness. This research embarks on a playful journey to untangle the unlikely correlation between the study of history and the cultural phenomenon that swept the world in 2012. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we unravel the statistical tapestry that connects the scholarly pursuits of historians with the gyrating musical antics of Psy's 'Gangnam Style.'
The initial impetus for this study arose from the whimsical musings of our research team, sparking bemused conversations about the potential interplay between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. Our findings, however, unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, indicating a startlingly robust statistical relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Internet searches for 'Gangnam Style' over the past decade. This unconventional correlation not only raises eyebrows but also beckons for further scrutiny and humorous contemplation.
The significance of this study extends beyond its comical premise; it underscores the value of embracing eccentric questions and pursuing intellectual inquiries with a zest for the unexpected. As we navigate through the following sections, we invite our esteemed readers to indulge in a bit of scholarly humor and join in our quest to demystify the offbeat connection between history enthusiasts and a Korean pop sensation.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 between the number of historians in Maryland and the frequency of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' from 2012 to 2021. This strong positive correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6496651, indicating that approximately 65% of the variation in 'Gangnam Style' searches could be explained by the number of historians in Maryland. The statistical significance of this relationship was further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the findings.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the relationship between the two variables, depicting a pronounced and unmistakable positive association. The scatterplot showcases the intriguing dance of data points, as the prevalence of historians coincides with intensified interest in the viral hit 'Gangnam Style.' It is indeed a tableau that echoes the ethos of unpredictability and whimsy that characterizes this unlikely interconnection.
The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a delightful reminder that the realms of academia and popular culture are not as mutually exclusive as one might assume. The humorous and idiosyncratic juxtaposition of historical scholarship with a catchy pop song beckons the scientific community to explore unconventional inquiries with an open mind and a lighthearted spirit. These findings not only add an entertaining dimension to the scholarly discourse but also invite us to embrace intellectual oddities with curiosity and amusement.
In summary, our investigation into the association between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' uncovers a statistically significant and positively correlated relationship, inviting a playful contemplation of the unexpected intersections between academic pursuits and viral phenomena. This comical and intellectually stimulating inquiry underscores the value of delving into unorthodox research questions and celebrating the whimsical synergies that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our whimsical exploration of the correlation between the number of historians in Maryland and the inexplicable allure of 'Gangnam Style,' we are left both bemused and enlightened by the statistical dance we have witnessed. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01, suggest a robust link between the scholarly pursuits of historians and the global fascination with Psy's catchy beats.

This unlikely partnership between history buffs and hip-thrusting pop stars reminds us that the world of research is not bereft of its own sense of humor. The visual representation provided by our scatterplot, much like a beautifully choreographed music video, unmistakably mirrors the amusing rhythm of our findings. As data points gallivant across the plot, one can almost envision a historical reenactment of Psy's iconic horse-riding dance moves amidst stacks of ancient tomes and manuscripts.

Yet, amidst the jocularity, the significance of this study lies in its testament to the whimsical symphony that pervades the scholarly pursuit. Just as a historian meticulously pieces together narratives of the past, our analysis has woven a tale of unexpected correlation, beckoning researchers to embrace intellectual oddities with mirthful curiosity.

Although the allure of quirky inquiries may tug at our academic sleeves, it is time to affirm that the correlation between historians and 'Gangnam Style' has been thoroughly explored. Our findings stand as a testament to the unearthing of intellectual whimsy, prompting a toast to the serendipitous jests that light the path of scholarly discoveries.

As we bid adieu to this uproarious journey, we assert with solemn levity that no further research is needed in this peculiar domain. While the correlation may leave us scratching our heads in amusement, it is time to tip our hats and bid 'Gangnam Style' adieu, at least in the realm of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Whimsical Historical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Maryland Historical and Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Historians and 'Gangnam Style': A Wacky Maryland Paradox with an abstract of This paper presents a surprising and zany investigation into the relationship between the number of historians in Maryland and Google searches for the infamous pop hit 'Gangnam Style.' Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the quirky interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8060180 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The statistically significant positive correlation between the number of historians and Internet queries about 'Gangnam Style' evokes a symphony of humor and curiosity, defying conventional expectations and prompting a comical exploration of the cultural and historical dynamics at play. This study not only offers a lighthearted analysis of the surprising link between academia and viral phenomena but also underscores the value of investigating unconventional and offbeat research questions.

ChatGPT:

Maryland historians, Gangnam Style, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, time period 2012-2021, Internet queries, academia, viral phenomena, historical dynamics, unconventional research, offbeat research questions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of historians in Maryland
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of historians in Maryland
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of historians in Maryland

Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'

Correlation r = 0.8060180 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6496651 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Gangnam Style') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of historians in Maryland) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0049. 0.0048660628239232090000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.49% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 206 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.36, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of historians in Maryland (Historians)150120708011011070707060
Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' (Rel. search volume)36.920.33334.666672.833331.3333311111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,120,70,80,110,110,70,70,70,60,])
array_2 = np.array([36.9,20.3333,4.66667,2.83333,1.33333,1,1,1,1,1,])
array_1_name = "The number of historians in Maryland"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Gangnam Style'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 2244 · Black Variable ID: 9106 · Red Variable ID: 1442
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0