about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,192 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Alabama and the second variable is Violent crime rates.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in cotton decreased in Alabama, it led to a decrease in cotton production overall. This in turn caused a massive shortage of cotton candy across the state. Without their beloved sugary treat, people's moods improved, leading to a reduction in overall stress and aggression. With less cotton-related tension in the air, the violent crime rates naturally saw a significant drop. When life gave Alabama less GMO cotton, it turns out it also gave them a little more peace and sweetness.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a scene of a cotton field in Alabama, rendered in a comic-book-style illustration from the 1960s, complete with muted colors and a halftone pattern. The vibrant, healthy rows of cotton plants should stretch into the distance, serving as a testament to the benefits of GMO technology. In the background, depict city buildings rising against the sky and police cars rushing by as they respond to the high violent crime rates in the area. The overall image should be visually striking and evoke a sense of vintage storytelling. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Macabre Cybernetic art Glitch art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Alabama, rows of vibrant green cotton plants stretch into the distance. The plants stand tall and healthy, a testament to the benefits of GMO technology. In the background, city buildings rise against the sky, with police cars rushing by as they respond to the high violent crime rates in the area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Alabama, rows of vibrant green cotton plants stretch into the distance. The plants stand tall and healthy, a testament to the benefits of GMO technology. In the background, city buildings rise against the sky, with police cars rushing by as they respond to the high violent crime rates in the area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a scene of a cotton field in Alabama, rendered in a comic-book-style illustration from the 1960s, complete with muted colors and a halftone pattern. The vibrant, healthy rows of cotton plants should stretch into the distance, serving as a testament to the benefits of GMO technology. In the background, depict city buildings rising against the sky and police cars rushing by as they respond to the high violent crime rates in the area. The overall image should be visually striking and evoke a sense of vintage storytelling.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Alabama caused Violent crime rates to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields

The Journal of Agricultural Mischief Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make crime-fighting clothes." Okay, maybe I made that up, but within the fields of agriculture and criminology, there's a juicy debate afoot - and it's not just about the best way to prepare okra. Yes, we're talking about the potential connection between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates in the heart of Dixie - Alabama.

In the elite circles of academia and research, there are moments when seemingly unrelated topics come together in a head-scratching, eyebrow-raising, "wait, what?" kind of way. Our team of intrepid researchers couldn't resist the allure of such an improbable tale - the tale of "GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields."

Picture it: the sunny, swaying cotton fields of Alabama, teeming with genetically modified versions of the fluffy white stuff. Now, add a sprinkle of statistical analysis and a dash of FBI crime data. Voila! You've got yourself a strangely compelling story of agriculture, genetics, and law-breaking. And who said academia isn't filled with riveting drama?

But seriously, dear readers, the topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has long been a hot potato - and not just in the literal sense. The controversies surrounding GMO use have raged on, with passionate debates about food safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. However, our research sets its gaze on a less-explored territory: the potential link between GMO cotton and violent crime. Yes, it's a bit "out there," like a rogue cornstalk in a wheat field, but as curious scholars, we couldn't resist the temptation to put our spades in uncharted soil.

In this paper, we invite you to join us on a quirky journey through the tangled vines of genetically modified cotton and the dark alleys of crime statistics. Our findings may surprise you, amuse you, and perhaps even inspire a few "Whaaaat?" exclamations. So, fasten your seatbelts, load up on puns, and let's explore this bizarre "crops-and-robbers" theory together.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make crime-fighting clothes." Okay, maybe I made that up, but within the fields of agriculture and criminology, there's a juicy debate afoot - and it's not just about the best way to prepare okra. Yes, we're talking about the potential connection between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates in the heart of Dixie - Alabama.
In the elite circles of academia and research, there are moments when seemingly unrelated topics come together in a head-scratching, eyebrow-raising, "wait, what?" kind of way. Our team of intrepid researchers couldn't resist the allure of such an improbable tale - the tale of "GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields."
Picture it: the sunny, swaying cotton fields of Alabama, teeming with genetically modified versions of the fluffy white stuff. Now, add a sprinkle of statistical analysis and a dash of FBI crime data. Voila! You've got yourself a strangely compelling story of agriculture, genetics, and law-breaking. And who said academia isn't filled with riveting drama?
But seriously, dear readers, the topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has long been a hot potato - and not just in the literal sense. The controversies surrounding GMO use have raged on, with passionate debates about food safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. However, our research sets its gaze on a less-explored territory: the potential link between GMO cotton and violent crime. Yes, it's a bit "out there," like a rogue cornstalk in a wheat field, but as curious scholars, we couldn't resist the temptation to put our spades in uncharted soil.
In this paper, we invite you to join us on a quirky journey through the tangled vines of genetically modified cotton and the dark alleys of crime statistics. Our findings may surprise you, amuse you, and perhaps even inspire a few "Whaaaat?" exclamations. So, fasten your seatbelts, load up on puns, and let's explore this bizarre "crops-and-robbers" theory together.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The seeds of our literature review sprouted from an eclectic mix of scholarly articles, non-fiction works, and a pinch of whimsy. We began by delving into the serious realm of agricultural studies, where Smith (2015) unearthed compelling evidence on the impact of GMO cotton cultivation on crop yield and pest resistance. Similarly, Doe (2018) contributed to the discourse with an in-depth analysis of the economic ramifications of genetically modified crops in Southern states. Jones (2020) provided a comprehensive overview of the regulatory frameworks surrounding GMO use in agricultural practices, shedding light on the legal landscape that governs the cultivation of modified cotton.

Venturing into the quirky side of the literature, we stumbled upon "Crops, Crimes, and Cotton: Unraveling the Enigma" by Greenfield and Fields, a tongue-in-cheek exploration of improbable connections between agricultural phenomena and criminal mischief. In a similar vein, "Gin and Genes: A Tale of Cotton and Crime" by Novel and Writer employed a playful lens to examine the folklore surrounding cotton cultivation and its purported influence on local crime yarns. Who knew that southern charm and scientific intrigue could converge in such peculiar ways?

But wait, the adventure didn't stop there. We also drew inspiration from the world of fiction, where we discovered "Gossamer Threads and Grit: A Crime Novel in Cotton Fields" by Punderstandably and Story Weever, a whimsical detective story set amidst the billowing cotton crops of Alabama. It seemed as though the very fabric of cotton fields had woven itself into the tapestry of literature, beckoning us to consider its enigmatic relationship with crime.

To add a dash of unexpected inspiration, we turned our gaze to the world of board games. A classic such as "Clue" whispered tantalizingly about the potential for hidden motives lurking amidst the cotton stalks and crime scenes, while "Agricola" hinted at the complexities of managing an ever-evolving agricultural landscape. Could our undertaking be akin to solving a perplexing board game mystery? Time would tell.

As we waded through this diverse array of sources, we found ourselves befuddled by the peculiar intersections of cotton, crime, and genetically modified organisms. The academic and creative realms collided in a symphony of curiosity, hinting at the enthralling tale that awaited us in the depths of our research. Join us as we unravel the threads of this tangled narrative, navigating through scholarly wisdom, artistic whimsy, and a touch of lighthearted absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make crime-fighting clothes." Okay, maybe I made that up, but within the fields of agriculture and criminology, there's a juicy debate afoot - and it's not just about the best way to prepare okra. Yes, we're talking about the potential connection between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates in the heart of Dixie - Alabama.
In the elite circles of academia and research, there are moments when seemingly unrelated topics come together in a head-scratching, eyebrow-raising, "wait, what?" kind of way. Our team of intrepid researchers couldn't resist the allure of such an improbable tale - the tale of "GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields."
Picture it: the sunny, swaying cotton fields of Alabama, teeming with genetically modified versions of the fluffy white stuff. Now, add a sprinkle of statistical analysis and a dash of FBI crime data. Voila! You've got yourself a strangely compelling story of agriculture, genetics, and law-breaking. And who said academia isn't filled with riveting drama?
But seriously, dear readers, the topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has long been a hot potato - and not just in the literal sense. The controversies surrounding GMO use have raged on, with passionate debates about food safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. However, our research sets its gaze on a less-explored territory: the potential link between GMO cotton and violent crime. Yes, it's a bit "out there," like a rogue cornstalk in a wheat field, but as curious scholars, we couldn't resist the temptation to put our spades in uncharted soil.
In this paper, we invite you to join us on a quirky journey through the tangled vines of genetically modified cotton and the dark alleys of crime statistics. Our findings may surprise you, amuse you, and perhaps even inspire a few "Whaaaat?" exclamations. So, fasten your seatbelts, load up on puns, and let's explore this bizarre "crops-and-robbers" theory together.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the seeds of truth in this potentially thorny field of research, our methodology incorporated a blend of quantitative analysis, spatial mapping, and a touch of whimsical curiosity. With our best southern drawl and a side of BBQ sauce, we delved into the data like intrepid explorers chasing a pesky raccoon through a cotton patch.

First, we scoured the treasure troves of information available from the USDA, where the secrets of genetically modified cotton are sown. Armed with spreadsheets and a strong cup of coffee, we combed through acres of data on cotton cultivation, genetic modifications, and agricultural trends, separating the weeds of irrelevant information from the valuable crop of statistical nuggets.

We then turned our gaze to the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, where crime data awaited our eager examination. Like detectives in a southern noir novel, we pored over reports of violent crimes, summoning the spirits of statistical analysis to reveal the hidden patterns lurking within the data.

With a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we conducted regression analyses, embracing the wild dance of correlation coefficients and significance levels. The data don’t lie, but they sure can tango! Our goal was to tease out the potential relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton and the rates of violent crime across the cotton-growing regions of Alabama.

To illuminate the geographical tapestry of our findings, we employed spatial mapping techniques, envisioning a cartographic quilt of crime rates and cotton fields. Like cartographers of old, we charted the territories where genetic modifications met criminal inclinations, weaving a complex narrative of nature, nurture, and a touch of statistical sorcery.

Given the convoluted nature of our topic, we also engaged in robust sensitivity analysis to ensure that our findings sprouted from sturdy statistical roots, rather than the flimsy tendrils of coincidence. We tested various models and scenarios, akin to discerning pastry chefs experimenting with different ingredients to perfect a delectable pie.

Lastly, to trim the overgrown thicket of potential biases, we employed meticulous controls and adjustments, cultivating a research design that could withstand the gusty winds of skepticism. Like tender plants in need of proper care, our methodology aimed to nurture a study that was not just compelling, but scientifically robust.

In summary, armed with data, analytical tools, and a sprinkling of whimsy, our methodology sought to unearth the mysteries lurking within the catacombs of agricultural and criminological data. It was a journey of inquiry, innovation, and more than a few unexpected turns, much like a quest through a cotton maze with a mischievous chipmunk for company.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9066718, r-squared of 0.8220538, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make crime-fighting clothes." Okay, maybe I made that up, but within the fields of agriculture and criminology, there's a juicy debate afoot - and it's not just about the best way to prepare okra. Yes, we're talking about the potential connection between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates in the heart of Dixie - Alabama.
In the elite circles of academia and research, there are moments when seemingly unrelated topics come together in a head-scratching, eyebrow-raising, "wait, what?" kind of way. Our team of intrepid researchers couldn't resist the allure of such an improbable tale - the tale of "GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields."
Picture it: the sunny, swaying cotton fields of Alabama, teeming with genetically modified versions of the fluffy white stuff. Now, add a sprinkle of statistical analysis and a dash of FBI crime data. Voila! You've got yourself a strangely compelling story of agriculture, genetics, and law-breaking. And who said academia isn't filled with riveting drama?
But seriously, dear readers, the topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has long been a hot potato - and not just in the literal sense. The controversies surrounding GMO use have raged on, with passionate debates about food safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. However, our research sets its gaze on a less-explored territory: the potential link between GMO cotton and violent crime. Yes, it's a bit "out there," like a rogue cornstalk in a wheat field, but as curious scholars, we couldn't resist the temptation to put our spades in uncharted soil.
In this paper, we invite you to join us on a quirky journey through the tangled vines of genetically modified cotton and the dark alleys of crime statistics. Our findings may surprise you, amuse you, and perhaps even inspire a few "Whaaaat?" exclamations. So, fasten your seatbelts, load up on puns, and let's explore this bizarre "crops-and-robbers" theory together.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In delving deep into the cotton fields and crime charts of Alabama, our study unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 between the use of genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates. If you're not well-versed in statistical lingo, let us translate that for you: it's a slam-dunk of a correlation, stronger than the aroma of freshly brewed coffee in a crowded lab.

The r-squared value of 0.8220538 further solidified the connection, indicating that approximately 82.2% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. To put it plainly, that's about as clear a link as finding a needle in a haystack - or in this case, a genetically modified cotton field.

Oh, and let's not forget that p-value. With a p < 0.01, the probability of obtaining such a strong correlation coefficient by random chance alone is as slim as a single strand of a cotton ball floating in the wind.

And if words aren't your thing, we've got a visual treat for you in Fig. 1. Behold, the scatterplot that encapsulates this curious relationship. It's like a beautiful dance of data points twirling around, whispering secrets of the tangled web woven between GMO cotton and crime rates.

In conclusion, our findings paint a picture of a potential "crime of genes" lurking within the seemingly innocent cotton fields of Alabama. This research raises eyebrows, stirs the pot, and adds a spicy dash of intrigue to the debate surrounding genetically modified organisms. So, buckle up, folks, the farm-to-felon connection is no longer just a seedling of a hypothesis - it's a full-grown stalk of statistical significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The seeds of our literature review sprouted from an eclectic mix of scholarly articles, non-fiction works, and a pinch of whimsy. We began by delving into the serious realm of agricultural studies, where Smith (2015) unearthed compelling evidence on the impact of GMO cotton cultivation on crop yield and pest resistance. Similarly, Doe (2018) contributed to the discourse with an in-depth analysis of the economic ramifications of genetically modified crops in Southern states. Jones (2020) provided a comprehensive overview of the regulatory frameworks surrounding GMO use in agricultural practices, shedding light on the legal landscape that governs the cultivation of modified cotton.
Venturing into the quirky side of the literature, we stumbled upon "Crops, Crimes, and Cotton: Unraveling the Enigma" by Greenfield and Fields, a tongue-in-cheek exploration of improbable connections between agricultural phenomena and criminal mischief. In a similar vein, "Gin and Genes: A Tale of Cotton and Crime" by Novel and Writer employed a playful lens to examine the folklore surrounding cotton cultivation and its purported influence on local crime yarns. Who knew that southern charm and scientific intrigue could converge in such peculiar ways?
But wait, the adventure didn't stop there. We also drew inspiration from the world of fiction, where we discovered "Gossamer Threads and Grit: A Crime Novel in Cotton Fields" by Punderstandably and Story Weever, a whimsical detective story set amidst the billowing cotton crops of Alabama. It seemed as though the very fabric of cotton fields had woven itself into the tapestry of literature, beckoning us to consider its enigmatic relationship with crime.
To add a dash of unexpected inspiration, we turned our gaze to the world of board games. A classic such as "Clue" whispered tantalizingly about the potential for hidden motives lurking amidst the cotton stalks and crime scenes, while "Agricola" hinted at the complexities of managing an ever-evolving agricultural landscape. Could our undertaking be akin to solving a perplexing board game mystery? Time would tell.
As we waded through this diverse array of sources, we found ourselves befuddled by the peculiar intersections of cotton, crime, and genetically modified organisms. The academic and creative realms collided in a symphony of curiosity, hinting at the enthralling tale that awaited us in the depths of our research. Join us as we unravel the threads of this tangled narrative, navigating through scholarly wisdom, artistic whimsy, and a touch of lighthearted absurdity.

[[RESULTS]]
In delving deep into the cotton fields and crime charts of Alabama, our study unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 between the use of genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates. If you're not well-versed in statistical lingo, let us translate that for you: it's a slam-dunk of a correlation, stronger than the aroma of freshly brewed coffee in a crowded lab.
The r-squared value of 0.8220538 further solidified the connection, indicating that approximately 82.2% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. To put it plainly, that's about as clear a link as finding a needle in a haystack - or in this case, a genetically modified cotton field.
Oh, and let's not forget that p-value. With a p < 0.01, the probability of obtaining such a strong correlation coefficient by random chance alone is as slim as a single strand of a cotton ball floating in the wind.
And if words aren't your thing, we've got a visual treat for you in Fig. 1. Behold, the scatterplot that encapsulates this curious relationship. It's like a beautiful dance of data points twirling around, whispering secrets of the tangled web woven between GMO cotton and crime rates.
In conclusion, our findings paint a picture of a potential "crime of genes" lurking within the seemingly innocent cotton fields of Alabama. This research raises eyebrows, stirs the pot, and adds a spicy dash of intrigue to the debate surrounding genetically modified organisms. So, buckle up, folks, the farm-to-felon connection is no longer just a seedling of a hypothesis - it's a full-grown stalk of statistical significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results unequivocally bolster the prior research that hinted at the tangled relationship between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates. Smith's (2015) work on cotton yield and pest resistance might seem like straightforward agriculture, but our findings suggest a peskier correlation - the potential influence of GMOs on criminal behavior. With the r-squared value of 0.8220538 strutting its stuff, it's as if our study has unraveled a "crops-and-convicts" mystery that would leave even Sherlock Holmes scratching his head.

Let's not forget Doe's (2018) enticing take on the economic impact of GM crops in Southern states. Our study adds a twist to this narrative, suggesting that the repercussions of GMO cotton might extend beyond the market, intertwining with the very fabric of crime rates. It's almost as if our research has spun a web of intrigue around a seemingly mundane agricultural practice - a "ginned-up" mystery worthy of its own crime novel.

Jones (2020) masterfully laid out the regulatory landscape surrounding GMOs, perhaps unaware of the clandestine connections between altered cotton and criminal activity. Could it be that in meticulously crafting regulations, the authorities had inadvertently sown the seeds for a "genetically modified crime wave," waiting to sprout in unsuspecting cotton fields? Our study offers a provocative twist to this tale, challenging the conventional wisdom surrounding the oversight of biotechnological endeavors.

As for the whimsical forays into agricultural-themed literature - Greenfield and Fields' "Crops, Crimes, and Cotton" and Novel and Writer's "Gin and Genes" might not have been as off-the-mark as one would suspect. Behind the playful veneer lies a semblance of truth, as our statistical analysis unearths the shadowy specter of criminal conduct lurking amidst the fibers of genetically modified cotton fields. Who would have thought that these light-hearted titles concealed a kernel of statistical significance, ready to germinate into a provocative scientific narrative?

Our exploration of cotton-related board games, much like the playful fiction, took on a new sheen of seriousness in light of our findings. "Clue" whispered of hidden motives, and "Agricola" hinted at the complexities of managing an ever-evolving agricultural landscape. Little did we know that we weren't just playing a board game, but embarking on a riveting quest to uncover the entwined destinies of GMO cotton and crime rates.

In this tangled tale of scientific inquiry, our study has cast the spotlight on an unexpected relationship between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates, challenging conventional wisdom and adding a layer of complexity to the discourse. Our research has sown the seeds of curiosity and unearthed a trove of statistical correlations, affirming the significance of GMO cotton in the web of criminal activity. So, as we eagerly await the next chapter of this riveting saga, we can't help but feel that our findings have sprouted a compelling root of inquiry in the fertile fields of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Alabama and Violent crime rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "When life gives you cotton, make crime-fighting clothes." Okay, maybe I made that up, but within the fields of agriculture and criminology, there's a juicy debate afoot - and it's not just about the best way to prepare okra. Yes, we're talking about the potential connection between genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates in the heart of Dixie - Alabama.
In the elite circles of academia and research, there are moments when seemingly unrelated topics come together in a head-scratching, eyebrow-raising, "wait, what?" kind of way. Our team of intrepid researchers couldn't resist the allure of such an improbable tale - the tale of "GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields."
Picture it: the sunny, swaying cotton fields of Alabama, teeming with genetically modified versions of the fluffy white stuff. Now, add a sprinkle of statistical analysis and a dash of FBI crime data. Voila! You've got yourself a strangely compelling story of agriculture, genetics, and law-breaking. And who said academia isn't filled with riveting drama?
But seriously, dear readers, the topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has long been a hot potato - and not just in the literal sense. The controversies surrounding GMO use have raged on, with passionate debates about food safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations. However, our research sets its gaze on a less-explored territory: the potential link between GMO cotton and violent crime. Yes, it's a bit "out there," like a rogue cornstalk in a wheat field, but as curious scholars, we couldn't resist the temptation to put our spades in uncharted soil.
In this paper, we invite you to join us on a quirky journey through the tangled vines of genetically modified cotton and the dark alleys of crime statistics. Our findings may surprise you, amuse you, and perhaps even inspire a few "Whaaaat?" exclamations. So, fasten your seatbelts, load up on puns, and let's explore this bizarre "crops-and-robbers" theory together.

[[RESULTS]]
In delving deep into the cotton fields and crime charts of Alabama, our study unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 between the use of genetically modified cotton and violent crime rates. If you're not well-versed in statistical lingo, let us translate that for you: it's a slam-dunk of a correlation, stronger than the aroma of freshly brewed coffee in a crowded lab.
The r-squared value of 0.8220538 further solidified the connection, indicating that approximately 82.2% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. To put it plainly, that's about as clear a link as finding a needle in a haystack - or in this case, a genetically modified cotton field.
Oh, and let's not forget that p-value. With a p < 0.01, the probability of obtaining such a strong correlation coefficient by random chance alone is as slim as a single strand of a cotton ball floating in the wind.
And if words aren't your thing, we've got a visual treat for you in Fig. 1. Behold, the scatterplot that encapsulates this curious relationship. It's like a beautiful dance of data points twirling around, whispering secrets of the tangled web woven between GMO cotton and crime rates.
In conclusion, our findings paint a picture of a potential "crime of genes" lurking within the seemingly innocent cotton fields of Alabama. This research raises eyebrows, stirs the pot, and adds a spicy dash of intrigue to the debate surrounding genetically modified organisms. So, buckle up, folks, the farm-to-felon connection is no longer just a seedling of a hypothesis - it's a full-grown stalk of statistical significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our research, I can't help but marvel at the tangled web we've unraveled - it's like a cotton ball on a windy day, bouncing from crime statistics to genetically modified shenanigans. Our findings leave little room for skepticism - the connection between GMO cotton and violent crime rates in Alabama is as clear as a pristine bale of cotton on a sunny day. It seems that these fields aren't just growing cotton; they're cultivating controversy, too.

While it's tempting to make puns about "seed money" and "criminal crop circles," the implications of our results are no joke. There's something more than fiber in those GMO cotton fields; there's a statistical drama unfolding, like a crime novel with an agricultural twist.

In the grand tradition of academic "wait, what?" moments, our study adds a quirky chapter to the book of unlikely correlations. But as we close this chapter, we must acknowledge that our research leaves little room for doubt - there's a link between GMO cotton and crime rates, and it's not something we can brush off like a lint roller.

With such compelling evidence in hand, I venture to say that no further research is needed in this curious domain. The verdict is in, the scales have tipped, and it's clear that the seeds of this inquiry have borne fruit. So, let's put this topic to rest, shall we? It's time to turn the page and leave this "crime of genes" discussion behind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Mischief Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ethical Agriculture and Sustainable Farming (SEASF)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO or Grow More Outrage? Exploring the Seeds of Crime in Cotton Fields with an abstract of In this study, our research team delved into the fertile grounds of the correlation between GMO use in cotton and violent crime rates in the state of Alabama. While critics may call the connection a "crops-and-robbers" theory, our analysis revealed some unexpectedly strong associations. By utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9066718 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. These findings suggest that there could be more to the fields of genetically modified cotton than meets the eye, perhaps a "crime of genes" at play. Our study sheds light on this controversial topic and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agriculture and criminal behavior.

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified organisms, cotton, crime rates, Alabama, correlation, USDA, FBI, criminal justice, agriculture, criminal behavior, "crops-and-robbers" theory

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Alabama
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Alabama that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Alabama

Violent crime rates
Detailed data title: The violent crime rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Violent crime rates

Correlation r = 0.9066718 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8220538 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Violent crime rates) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Alabama) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-7. 0.0000002152123187174421400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 2.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,646,574 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Alabama (GMO cotton %)282525151874114632365323
Violent crime rates (Violent crime)469479.3471.8458.6431.9404.5387.1387.8369.1361.6373.7397.5394.9383.4380.8398.5387380.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([28,25,25,15,18,7,4,11,4,6,3,2,3,6,5,3,2,3,])
array_2 = np.array([469,479.3,471.8,458.6,431.9,404.5,387.1,387.8,369.1,361.6,373.7,397.5,394.9,383.4,380.8,398.5,387,380.7,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Alabama"
array_2_name = "Violent crime rates"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2192 · Black Variable ID: 779 · Red Variable ID: 20220
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0